Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Unlocking the Archives: Using Large Language Models to Transcribe Handwritten Historical Documents

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.03340 v1 pith:2AYQ7DFE submitted 2024-11-02 cs.CV cs.CLcs.DLcs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.CLcs.DLcs.LG
keywords handwrittenllmsdocumentssoftwarehistoricallanguagesignificantlytranscribe
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This study demonstrates that Large Language Models (LLMs) can transcribe historical handwritten documents with significantly higher accuracy than specialized Handwritten Text Recognition (HTR) software, while being faster and more cost-effective. We introduce an open-source software tool called Transcription Pearl that leverages these capabilities to automatically transcribe and correct batches of handwritten documents using commercially available multimodal LLMs from OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google. In tests on a diverse corpus of 18th/19th century English language handwritten documents, LLMs achieved Character Error Rates (CER) of 5.7 to 7% and Word Error Rates (WER) of 8.9 to 15.9%, improvements of 14% and 32% respectively over specialized state-of-the-art HTR software like Transkribus. Most significantly, when LLMs were then used to correct those transcriptions as well as texts generated by conventional HTR software, they achieved near-human levels of accuracy, that is CERs as low as 1.8% and WERs of 3.5%. The LLMs also completed these tasks 50 times faster and at approximately 1/50th the cost of proprietary HTR programs. These results demonstrate that when LLMs are incorporated into software tools like Transcription Pearl, they provide an accessible, fast, and highly accurate method for mass transcription of historical handwritten documents, significantly streamlining the digitization process.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. An HTR-LLM Workflow for High-Accuracy Transcription and Analysis of Abbreviated Latin Court Hand

    cs.DL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A four-stage HTR plus LLM pipeline transcribed four medieval Latin court cases with word error rates between 2% and 7%, though the metric and case selection make that range optimistic.

Pith tools