REVIEW 1 cited by
GCI-ViTAL: Gradual Confidence Improvement with Vision Transformers for Active Learning on Label Noise
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Active learning aims to train accurate classifiers while minimizing labeling costs by strategically selecting informative samples for annotation. This study focuses on image classification tasks, comparing AL methods on CIFAR10, CIFAR100, Food101, and the Chest X-ray datasets under varying label noise rates. We investigate the impact of model architecture by comparing Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Vision Transformer (ViT)-based models. Additionally, we propose a novel deep active learning algorithm, GCI-ViTAL, designed to be robust to label noise. GCI-ViTAL utilizes prediction entropy and the Frobenius norm of last-layer attention vectors compared to class-centric clean set attention vectors. Our method identifies samples that are both uncertain and semantically divergent from typical images in their assigned class. This allows GCI-ViTAL to select informative data points even in the presence of label noise while flagging potentially mislabeled candidates. Label smoothing is applied to train a model that is not overly confident about potentially noisy labels. We evaluate GCI-ViTAL under varying levels of symmetric label noise and compare it to five other AL strategies. Our results demonstrate that using ViTs leads to significant performance improvements over CNNs across all AL strategies, particularly in noisy label settings. We also find that using the semantic information of images as label grounding helps in training a more robust model under label noise. Notably, we do not perform extensive hyperparameter tuning, providing an out-of-the-box comparison that addresses the common challenge practitioners face in selecting models and active learning strategies without an exhaustive literature review on training and fine-tuning vision models on real-world application data.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Balancing Accuracy, Calibration, and Efficiency in Active Learning with Vision Transformers Under Label Noise
Under symmetric label noise, the larger ViTl32 model consistently outperforms smaller and higher-token-count variants in both accuracy and calibration, while Swin transformers lag behind.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.