Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

PDC & DM-SFT: A Road for LLM SQL Bug-Fix Enhancing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.06767 v1 pith:EYL3MVMA submitted 2024-11-11 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords codemethodsbug-fixingdm-sftmodelsabilitiesfirstsupervised
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Code Large Language Models (Code LLMs), such as Code llama and DeepSeek-Coder, have demonstrated exceptional performance in the code generation tasks. However, most existing models focus on the abilities of generating correct code, but often struggle with bug repair. We introduce a suit of methods to enhance LLM's SQL bug-fixing abilities. The methods are mainly consisted of two parts: A Progressive Dataset Construction (PDC) from scratch and Dynamic Mask Supervised Fine-tuning (DM-SFT). PDC proposes two data expansion methods from the perspectives of breadth first and depth first respectively. DM-SFT introduces an efficient bug-fixing supervised learning approach, which effectively reduce the total training steps and mitigate the "disorientation" in SQL code bug-fixing training. In our evaluation, the code LLM models trained with two methods have exceeds all current best performing model which size is much larger.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. BitsAI-Fix: LLM-Driven Approach for Automated Lint Error Resolution in Practice

    cs.SE 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A 32B LLM trained with progressive reinforcement learning on cold-start and user-feedback data fixes Go lint errors at 84.68% accuracy with 1.72% redundancy on a private ByteDance test set.

Pith tools