Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Controllable Context Sensitivity and the Knob Behind It

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.07404 v4 pith:46O5BCYO submitted 2024-11-11 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords modelcontextknowledgepriorsubspacesensitivityknobmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

When making predictions, a language model must trade off how much it relies on its context vs. its prior knowledge. Choosing how sensitive the model is to its context is a fundamental functionality, as it enables the model to excel at tasks like retrieval-augmented generation and question-answering. In this paper, we search for a knob which controls this sensitivity, determining whether language models answer from the context or their prior knowledge. To guide this search, we design a task for controllable context sensitivity. In this task, we first feed the model a context (Paris is in England) and a question (Where is Paris?); we then instruct the model to either use its prior or contextual knowledge and evaluate whether it generates the correct answer for both intents (either France or England). When fine-tuned on this task, instruction-tuned versions of Llama-3.1, Mistral-v0.3, and Gemma-2 can solve it with high accuracy (85-95%). Analyzing these high-performing models, we narrow down which layers may be important to context sensitivity using a novel linear time algorithm. Then, in each model, we identify a 1-D subspace in a single layer that encodes whether the model follows context or prior knowledge. Interestingly, while we identify this subspace in a fine-tuned model, we find that the exact same subspace serves as an effective knob in not only that model but also non-fine-tuned instruct and base models of that model family. Finally, we show a strong correlation between a model's performance and how distinctly it separates context-agreeing from context-ignoring answers in this subspace. These results suggest a single subspace facilitates how the model chooses between context and prior knowledge, hinting at a simple fundamental mechanism that controls this behavior.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Single Direction of Truth: An Observer Model's Linear Residual Probe Exposes and Steers Contextual Hallucinations

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A single linear direction in an observer model's residual stream detects contextual hallucinations, transfers across models and datasets, and causally steers generation hallucination rates.

  2. Sycophancy as compositions of Atomic Psychometric Traits

    cs.AI 2025-08 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    Sycophancy is proposed to be a composed vector of HEXACO trait directions in LLM activation space; only preliminary cosine-similarity support is shown.

Pith tools