Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

How Good is ChatGPT at Audiovisual Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, AI Models and Human Perception

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.09266 v1 pith:I6XNPUOX submitted 2024-11-14 cs.CV cs.AIcs.HCcs.LGcs.MM

classification cs.CVcs.AIcs.HCcs.LGcs.MM
keywords chatgptdetectionmodelsaudiovisualdeepfakeforensicmanipulationsmultimodal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Multimodal deepfakes involving audiovisual manipulations are a growing threat because they are difficult to detect with the naked eye or using unimodal deep learningbased forgery detection methods. Audiovisual forensic models, while more capable than unimodal models, require large training datasets and are computationally expensive for training and inference. Furthermore, these models lack interpretability and often do not generalize well to unseen manipulations. In this study, we examine the detection capabilities of a large language model (LLM) (i.e., ChatGPT) to identify and account for any possible visual and auditory artifacts and manipulations in audiovisual deepfake content. Extensive experiments are conducted on videos from a benchmark multimodal deepfake dataset to evaluate the detection performance of ChatGPT and compare it with the detection capabilities of state-of-the-art multimodal forensic models and humans. Experimental results demonstrate the importance of domain knowledge and prompt engineering for video forgery detection tasks using LLMs. Unlike approaches based on end-to-end learning, ChatGPT can account for spatial and spatiotemporal artifacts and inconsistencies that may exist within or across modalities. Additionally, we discuss the limitations of ChatGPT for multimedia forensic tasks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Digital Forensic Investigation of the ChatGPT Windows Application

    cs.CR 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    This paper catalogs recoverable forensic traces left by the ChatGPT Windows desktop app, including chat prompts in RAM, registry entries, disk files, network endpoints, and export metadata, and shows they can survive ...

Pith tools