Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 261 references

Exotic phases in finite-density $\mathbb{Z}_3$ theories

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that in finite-density $\mathbb{Z}_3$ lattice gauge and spin theories, only chiral spin models and their complex duals support a Devil's flower phase structure, and it traces that dichotomy to the presence or absence of…

desk verdict A useful and honest MKRG survey of Z3 models; the Devil's flower classification is plausible but the 'only' half is not yet proven. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.11773 v2 pith:XW342URA submitted 2024-11-18 hep-ph hep-lathep-thnucl-th

classification hep-phhep-lathep-thnucl-th
keywords Z3latticegaugetheoryfinite-densityQCDKramers-WannierdualityMigdal-KadanoffrenormalizationgroupDevil'sflowerchiralspinmodelsElitzur'stheoremCKsymmetry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish which lattice models with a chemical potential are forced to develop an endless cascade of layered, striped phases. It studies $\mathbb{Z}_3$ spin and gauge theories whose complex actions mimic finite-density QCD, complete with a sign problem and CK symmetry, and maps each one onto a 'chiral' partner through an extension of Kramers-Wannier duality. Using the Migdal-Kadanoff real-space renormalization group, the authors compute approximate phase diagrams in one through four dimensions and find that only chiral spin models and their complex duals show a Devil's flower: an infinite set of commensurate inhomogeneous phases that are $\mathbb{Z}_3$ analogues of chiral spirals. They trace this to Elitzur's theorem, since those models alone possess a local order parameter. Along the way they report that different orderings of bond-moving and decimation give different numbers of phases, a breakdown of universality for the real-space RG in non-Hermitian systems.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the complex-chiral extension of Kramers-Wannier duality together with the two primitive Migdal-Kadanoff operations. A $\mathbb{Z}_3$ Boltzmann weight is expanded as $w(s)=a+bs+cs^*$; the complex model has real character coefficients $\{a,b,c\}$ while the chiral model has coefficients $\{1,z,z^*\}$, and duality is the involutive identification $z=e^{-J/2+i\theta}$ of the chiral coupling with the complex-model weights. Decimation squares character coefficients, $d_2(a,b,c)=(a^2,b^2,c^2)$, and bond-moving squares Boltzmann weights, $b_2(a,b,c)=(a^2+2bc,c^2+2ab,b^2+2ac)$; any Migdal-Kadanoff transformation is a word in these operations, and the RG flow of $z$ under such words determines the number of phases. For the Devil's flower itself, the mechanism is a Landau free energy with a local order parameter $M=\rho e^{i\phi}$ that reduces at low temperature to the Frenkel-Kontorova model, whose competing potential and gradient terms force the phase $\phi$ into a Devil's staircase of commensurate values.

What would settle it

Directly simulate the 3D chiral $\mathbb{Z}_3$ spin model on a cubic lattice in its sign-problem-free region, measure the winding number of the layered order parameter as a function of the chiral angle at small $\tilde J$, and count the commensurate plateaus; an infinite accumulating staircase would support the paper's classification, while a finite number of plateaus, for example only the four phases seen in models without a local order parameter, would falsify it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is a classification. For $d \geq 3$, among all complex and chiral $\mathbb{Z}_3$ spin and gauge models, the Devil's flower phase structure appears only in chiral spin models and in the complex models dual to them; it is absent in models (or duals) lacking a local order parameter, a distinction the paper attributes to Elitzur's theorem, which forbids spontaneous breaking of local gauge symmetry. The same Migdal-Kadanoff transform, iterated to fixed-point stability, predicts that in these models the low-temperature region contains infinitely many commensurate phases, each corresponding to a wave number of layered $\mathbb{Z}_3$ spins, while every other model family has only the minimal four phases. The paper also establishes that the generalized duality is involutive and preserved by the RG, so every complex-model phase diagram is identical to its chiral dual, and that the RG results are scheme-dependent: the number of phases ranges from four to twenty-five depending on the order of bond-moving and decimation, so the real-space RG alone cannot decide the correct lattice symmetry.

Load-bearing premise

The classification rests on treating the basins of attraction of an approximate Migdal-Kadanoff RG map, iterated six times with blocking factor two, as the true phase diagram of the lattice model, a premise the paper itself weakens by showing that the number of phases depends on the order of bond-moving and decimation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the classification is right, 3D and 4D chiral $\mathbb{Z}_3$ spin models, and the complex gauge or spin models dual to them, contain an infinite sequence of commensurate inhomogeneous phases, each a different wave number of $\mathbb{Z}_3$ layers, with phase boundaries accumulating in a fractal pattern.
  • The absence of a local order parameter, rather than the detailed interaction strength, becomes the criterion for whether a finite-density lattice model can host such a Devil's flower; models whose chiral variables are gauge fields cannot.
  • For $\mathbb{Z}_N$ with $N>3$, the same reasoning predicts chiral spin models and their duals have Devil's flowers in $d \geq 3$, while complex $\mathbb{Z}_N$ models have one disordered and exactly $N$ ordered phases on a cubic lattice.
  • For $\mathrm{SU}(N)$ with $N \geq 3$, chiral $\mathrm{SU}(N)$ spin models should show the Devil's flower at sufficiently strong coupling, while chiral $\mathrm{SU}(N)$ gauge models should show only a four-phase structure, because of Elitzur's theorem.
  • At nonzero temperature, dimensional reduction turns a 4D chiral $\mathbb{Z}_3$ gauge theory into a 3D chiral spin system of Polyakov loops, so the Devil's flower should reappear in the finite-temperature theory, while the corresponding complex gauge theory should not show it.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: if the Elitzur-based criterion is the operative one, then other finite-density lattice models whose dual formulation possesses a local order parameter, such as effective Polyakov-loop or quark-meson models, should also be searched for a Devil's flower even when the original variables are gauge fields.
  • Editorial inference: the strong scheme dependence reported here suggests that quantitative phase counts from any single real-space RG word, such as $DB$ or $BDB$, should not be trusted as predictions for a cubic lattice; the classification may still be robust, but the number of phases and their boundaries need confirmation from sign-problem-free dual simulations or tensor networks.
  • Editorial inference: the Frenkel-Kontorova reduction implies that the Devil's flower phase boundaries in $\mathbb{Z}_N$ chiral spin models should obey a universal commensurability structure independent of $N$ in the large-$N$ limit, which a dedicated mean-field or transfer-matrix scan could test.
  • Editorial inference: a direct testable extension is to simulate the 3D chiral $\mathbb{Z}_3$ spin model on a cubic lattice in its sign-problem-free region and measure the wave number of the layered order parameter as a function of the chiral angle; a finite number of plateaus would falsify the infinite Devil's flower, while an accumulating staircase would confirm the paper's central classification
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a generalized Kramers-Wannier duality mapping complex (sign-problematic) Z3 lattice spin and gauge models to chiral Z3 models, and uses a Migdal-Kadanoff real-space RG to compute approximate phase diagrams in d=1,...,4. The main claimed result is that in d≥3 only chiral Z3 spin models and their complex duals exhibit a Devil's-flower structure with an infinite set of commensurate inhomogeneous phases, which the authors attribute to Elitzur's theorem. The paper also reports that different orderings of bond-moving and decimation produce different numbers of phases (from 4 to 25 depending on model and ordering), which it interprets as a failure of universality in the real-space RG for non-Hermitian systems.

Significance. The exact duality construction (Section 2.2) is a solid and clearly presented contribution; it extends Abelian lattice duality to complex/chiral pairs and identifies sign-problem-free regions, which is potentially useful for numerical work. The systematic documentation of MKRG scheme dependence (Section 4.1) is a useful cautionary result. If the Devil's-flower classification were established, it would be an interesting connection between the existence of a local order parameter (or its dual) and the appearance of an infinite family of inhomogeneous phases in finite-density lattice models. The positive half of the classification (chiral spin models and their duals do have Devil's flowers) is well supported by the low-temperature expansions and prior work summarized in Appendix A. The negative half, however, is not supported to the same standard, as detailed in the major comments.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.2] The central claim "In d ≥ 3, only chiral spin models and their complex duals have a Devil's flower phase structure" is not established by the evidence presented. The negative half of the claim rests entirely on the Migdal-Kadanoff basin plots of Section 3, computed with blocking factor λ=2 and n=6 iterations. Section 4.1 shows that this method is strongly scheme-dependent: the number of phases in the 3D complex spin model ranges from 4 (BBD) to 13 (DBB), and in the 4D complex spin model from 4 (DB^3) to 25 (DBBB), and the paper itself states that "the real-space RG cannot answer which symmetry is correct on a standard cubic lattice." Under these conditions, the absence of an infinite commensurate family in a given model is precisely the kind of conclusion that can be an artifact of truncation or of the chosen operator ordering: a true Devil's flower could be partially resolved, split, or suppressed by the approximate RG. The Elitzur-based argument in Section 4.2 does not close this gap, because the absence of a local gauge-invariant order parameter does not by itself rule out ordering via nonlocal order parameters or modulated correlation functions; indeed, Section 4.3 invokes Polyakov-loop-induced Devil's-flower structure at finite temperature. Thus the "only" in the classification is currently a statement about λ=2 MKRG phase diagrams, not a demonstrated property of the cubic-lattice models.
  2. [§4.1] The scheme dependence of the MKRG phase diagrams is reported as "a violation of the expectation for universal behavior from a real-space RG." Because Migdal-Kadanoff is an approximate scheme on conventional lattices (exact only on hierarchical lattices, as stated in Section 2.3), the observed ordering dependence is, at face value, a known limitation of the approximation rather than a physical property of the non-Hermitian models. The paper should distinguish these possibilities; if the authors wish to claim a genuine breakdown of universality in the underlying models, they need evidence from a method that is not itself scheme-dependent (e.g., higher-order RG, tensor networks, or exact transfer-matrix calculations in special cases). This distinction is load-bearing because the same MKRG is used to support the negative half of the Devil's-flower classification.
  3. [§3.1, §4.2] The paper does not provide a convergence or resolution study for the basin-of-attraction method: the choices λ=2 and n=6 are justified only by a remark in Section 3.1 that n=6 is "sufficient." Given that the central claim concerns infinite families of commensurate phases, the paper should show how the number of resolved phases changes with n and λ, or at least quantify the resolution limit. This is particularly relevant because Section 4.2 notes that for λ=3 the Devil's-flower structure "is just harder to discern," indicating that apparent absence of a Devil's flower in some models could be a resolution effect rather than a physical absence.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§2.4] There is a typo in the last paragraph: "symemtries" should be "symmetries."
  2. [§4.2] In the sentence beginning "However, the lines separating the different regions still map," the verb should agree with the plural subject "lines": "still map" is correct, but the preceding phrase "the line separating" is singular; please make the subject and verb consistent.
  3. [§4.3] The symbol T is used both for temperature and for time-reversal symmetry; consider using a different notation (e.g., \mathcal{T} for time reversal) to avoid confusion in a paper where PT symmetry is central.
  4. [Figure captions, §3] The phase-diagram figures (Figures 2-8) do not include a legend or a description of the color coding; since the paper compares numbers of phases across schemes, a consistent labeling of phases would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central phase diagrams are new MKRG computations, and the self-citations are background rather than load-bearing inputs.

full rationale

The derivation chain is: define the complex and chiral Z3 actions; prove the complex-chiral duality by character expansion (z = e^{-J/2+i\theta}); define the Migdal-Kadanoff maps d2 and b2; iterate them for n=6 steps; and read off the basins of attraction as phases. No parameter is fitted to a target phase diagram, and no reported 'prediction' is a renamed fit. The Devil's-flower statement for chiral spin models is supported by external low-temperature expansions (refs. [229-236]) and by Appendix A, and the statement for the complex duals follows from the exact duality rather than from a self-citation. The negative half of the classification ('only chiral spin models and their complex duals') is an approximate MKRG result; the authors explicitly concede that 'the real-space RG cannot answer which symmetry is correct on a standard cubic lattice' and show scheme-dependence in the number of phases. That is a robustness/correctness limitation, not circularity. The paper also invokes Elitzur's theorem [253] as an explanatory attribution for the pattern, but the theorem is an external result and is not used to construct the RG phase diagrams. The self-citations in the paper ([50-52,90,96,97], Table 1) appear in background and interpretation sections, and the central claim does not reduce to any of them. No equation or basin classification is equivalent to its own input by construction. The low score reflects the presence of self-citations without any load-bearing circular step.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No parameters are fitted to external data; the model couplings J and θ are inputs. The methodological choices λ=2 and n=6 are listed as free parameters. The Elitzur-based classification is the main non-derived input.

free parameters (3)
  • RG blocking factor λ = 2 (default); 3 discussed in Section 4.2
    Chosen for the main computations; not fitted to any external target.
  • RG iteration count n = 6
    Chosen as sufficient for convergence of basins of attraction; stated in Section 3.1.
  • Landau parameters B, C, ρ0, and A = unspecified
    Introduced in Section 4.2 to link the chiral model to the Frenkel-Kontorova model; the paper notes explicit values can be obtained from mean field theory [252], but they are not used quantitatively.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The basins of attraction of the MKRG map determine the phase diagram.
    Used throughout Section 3; the scheme-dependence result in Section 4.1 directly challenges this premise.
  • ad hoc to paper Elitzur's theorem forbidding spontaneous breaking of local gauge symmetries implies absence of Devil's flower in models without a local order parameter.
    Section 4.2; the implication is argued, not derived from the theorem.
  • standard math The character expansion and Z3 Fourier transform are valid for complex Boltzmann weights and the duality is involutive.
    Used in Section 2.2 to establish complex-chiral duality.
  • domain assumption Low-temperature expansion and configuration-worldline duality correctly describe the infinite commensurate phases of chiral spin models.
    Appendix A and Section 4.2; based on refs [230,231].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Exotic phases in finite-density $\mathbb{Z}_3$ theories." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XW342URA

@misc{pith2026241111773,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Exotic phases in finite-density $\mathbbZ_3$ theories},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XW342URA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.11773}
}
abstract

Lattice $\mathbb{Z}_3$ theories with complex actions share many key features with finite-density QCD including a sign problem and $CK$ symmetry. Complex $\mathbb{Z}_3$ spin and gauge models exhibit a generalized Kramers-Wannier duality mapping them onto chiral $\mathbb{Z}_3$ spin and gauge models, which are simulatable with standard lattice methods in large regions of parameter space. The Migdal-Kadanoff real-space renormalization group (RG) preserves this duality, and we use it to compute the approximate phase diagram of both spin and gauge $\mathbb{Z}_3$ models in dimensions one through four. Chiral $\mathbb{Z}_3$ spin models are known to exhibit a Devil's Flower phase structure, with inhomogeneous phases which can be thought of as $\mathbb{Z}_3$ analogues of chiral spirals. Out of the large class of models we study, we find that only chiral spin models and their duals have a Devil's Flower structure with an infinite set of inhomogeneous phases, a result we attribute to Elitzur's theorem. We also find that different forms of the Migdal-Kadanoff RG produce different numbers of phases, a violation of the expectation for universal behavior from a real-space RG. We discuss extensions of our work to $\mathbb{Z}_N$ models, SU($N$) models and nonzero temperature.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

261 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The Frontiers of Nuclear Science, A Long Range Plan, 0809.3137

  2. [2]

    Akiba et al.,The Hot QCD White Paper: Exploring the Phases of QCD at RHIC and the LHC, 1502.02730

    Y. Akiba et al.,The Hot QCD White Paper: Exploring the Phases of QCD at RHIC and the LHC, 1502.02730

  3. [3]

    Achenbach et al.,The Present and Future of QCD, 2303.02579

    P. Achenbach et al.,The Present and Future of QCD, 2303.02579

  4. [4]

    STARcollaboration, K. H. Ackermann et al.,STAR detector overview, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 499 (2003) 624

  5. [5]

    Adare et al.,An Upgrade Proposal from the PHENIX Collaboration, 1501.06197

    PHENIX collaboration, A. Adare et al.,An Upgrade Proposal from the PHENIX Collaboration, 1501.06197

  6. [6]

    Aamodt et al.,The ALICE experiment at the CERN LHC, JINST 3 (2008) S08002

    ALICE collaboration, K. Aamodt et al.,The ALICE experiment at the CERN LHC, JINST 3 (2008) S08002

  7. [7]

    Ablyazimov et al.,Challenges in QCD matter physics –The scientific programme of the Compressed Baryonic Matter experiment at FAIR, Eur

    CBM collaboration, T. Ablyazimov et al.,Challenges in QCD matter physics –The scientific programme of the Compressed Baryonic Matter experiment at FAIR, Eur. Phys. J. A 53 (2017) 60 [1607.01487]

  8. [8]

    Busza, K

    W. Busza, K. Rajagopal and W. van der Schee,Heavy Ion Collisions: The Big Picture, and the Big Questions, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.68 (2018) 339 [1802.04801]

Show all 261 references
  1. [9]

    Aarts,Introductory lectures on lattice QCD at nonzero baryon number, J

    G. Aarts,Introductory lectures on lattice QCD at nonzero baryon number, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 706 (2016) 022004 [1512.05145]

  2. [10]

    Nagata,Finite-density lattice QCD and sign problem: Current status and open problems, Prog

    K. Nagata,Finite-density lattice QCD and sign problem: Current status and open problems, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.127 (2022) 103991 [2108.12423]

  3. [11]

    Ratti,Lattice QCD and heavy ion collisions: a review of recent progress, Rept

    C. Ratti,Lattice QCD and heavy ion collisions: a review of recent progress, Rept. Prog. Phys. 81 (2018) 084301 [1804.07810]

  4. [12]

    Ratti and R

    C. Ratti and R. Bellwied,The Deconfinement Transition of QCD: Theory Meets Experiment, vol. 981 ofLecture Notes in Physics. 6, 2021, 10.1007/978-3-030-67235-5

  5. [13]

    I. M. Barbour, S. E. Morrison, E. G. Klepfish, J. B. Kogut and M.-P. Lombardo,Results on finite density QCD, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.60 (1998) 220 [hep-lat/9705042]

  6. [14]

    Fodor and S

    Z. Fodor and S. D. Katz,A New method to study lattice QCD at finite temperature and chemical potential, Phys. Lett. B534 (2002) 87 [hep-lat/0104001]

  7. [15]

    Fodor and S

    Z. Fodor and S. D. Katz,Lattice determination of the critical point of QCD at finite T and mu, JHEP 03 (2002) 014 [hep-lat/0106002]

  8. [16]

    Fodor, S

    Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz and C. Schmidt,The Density of states method at non-zero chemical potential, JHEP 03 (2007) 121 [hep-lat/0701022]

  9. [17]

    Alexandru, C

    A. Alexandru, C. Gattringer, H. P. Schadler, K. Splittorff and J. J. M. Verbaarschot, Distribution of Canonical Determinants in QCD, Phys. Rev. D91 (2015) 074501 [1411.4143]

  10. [18]

    Alexandru, M

    A. Alexandru, M. Faber, I. Horvath and K.-F. Liu,Lattice QCD at finite density via a new canonical approach, Phys. Rev. D72 (2005) 114513 [hep-lat/0507020]

  11. [19]

    Kratochvila and P

    S. Kratochvila and P. de Forcrand,The Canonical approach to finite density QCD, PoS LA T2005(2006) 167 [hep-lat/0509143]

  12. [20]

    Ejiri,Canonical partition function and finite density phase transition in lattice QCD, Phys

    S. Ejiri,Canonical partition function and finite density phase transition in lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 074507 [0804.3227]. – 25 –

  13. [21]

    Gattringer,New developments for dual methods in lattice field theory at non-zero density, PoS LA TTICE2013(2014) 002 [1401.7788]

    C. Gattringer,New developments for dual methods in lattice field theory at non-zero density, PoS LA TTICE2013(2014) 002 [1401.7788]

  14. [22]

    Cristoforetti, F

    AuroraScience collaboration, M. Cristoforetti, F. Di Renzo and L. Scorzato,New approach to the sign problem in quantum field theories: High density QCD on a Lefschetz thimble, Phys. Rev. D86 (2012) 074506 [1205.3996]

  15. [23]

    Alexandru, G

    A. Alexandru, G. Basar and P. Bedaque,Monte Carlo algorithm for simulating fermions on Lefschetz thimbles, Phys. Rev. D93 (2016) 014504 [1510.03258]

  16. [24]

    Alexandru, G

    A. Alexandru, G. Basar, P. F. Bedaque, G. W. Ridgway and N. C. Warrington,Sign problem and Monte Carlo calculations beyond Lefschetz thimbles, JHEP 05 (2016) 053 [1512.08764]

  17. [25]

    Parisi,ON COMPLEX PROBABILITIES, Phys

    G. Parisi,ON COMPLEX PROBABILITIES, Phys. Lett. B131 (1983) 393

  18. [26]

    Attanasio, B

    F. Attanasio, B. Jäger and F. P. G. Ziegler,Complex Langevin simulations and the QCD phase diagram: Recent developments, Eur. Phys. J. A56 (2020) 251 [2006.00476]

  19. [27]

    M. S. Albergo, G. Kanwar and P. E. Shanahan,Flow-based generative models for Markov chain Monte Carlo in lattice field theory, Phys. Rev. D100 (2019) 034515 [1904.12072]

  20. [28]

    Lawrence and Y

    S. Lawrence and Y. Yamauchi,Normalizing Flows and the Real-Time Sign Problem, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 114509 [2101.05755]

  21. [29]

    E. Rico, T. Pichler, M. Dalmonte, P. Zoller and S. Montangero,Tensor networks for Lattice Gauge Theories and Atomic Quantum Simulation, Phys. Rev. Lett.112 (2014) 201601 [1312.3127]

  22. [30]

    Pichler, M

    T. Pichler, M. Dalmonte, E. Rico, P. Zoller and S. Montangero,Real-time Dynamics in U(1) Lattice Gauge Theories with Tensor Networks, Phys. Rev. X 6 (2016) 011023 [1505.04440]

  23. [31]

    Kadoh, Y

    D. Kadoh, Y. Kuramashi, Y. Nakamura, R. Sakai, S. Takeda and Y. Yoshimura,Tensor network formulation for two-dimensional latticeN = 1 Wess-Zumino model, JHEP 03 (2018) 141 [1801.04183]

  24. [32]

    Kadoh, Y

    D. Kadoh, Y. Kuramashi, Y. Nakamura, R. Sakai, S. Takeda and Y. Yoshimura,Tensor network analysis of critical coupling in two dimensionalϕ4 theory, JHEP 05 (2019) 184 [1811.12376]

  25. [33]

    Kuramashi and Y

    Y. Kuramashi and Y. Yoshimura,Three-dimensional finite temperature Z2 gauge theory with tensor network scheme, JHEP 08 (2019) 023 [1808.08025]

  26. [34]

    Magnifico, T

    G. Magnifico, T. Felser, P. Silvi and S. Montangero,Lattice quantum electrodynamics in (3+1)-dimensions at finite density with tensor networks, Nature Commun. 12 (2021) 3600 [2011.10658]

  27. [35]

    X. Yuan, J. Sun, J. Liu, Q. Zhao and Y. Zhou,Quantum Simulation with Hybrid Tensor Networks, Phys. Rev. Lett.127 (2021) 040501 [2007.00958]

  28. [36]

    Meurice, J

    Y. Meurice, J. C. Osborn, R. Sakai, J. Unmuth-Yockey, S. Catterall and R. D. Somma, Tensor networks for High Energy Physics: contribution to Snowmass 2021, in2022 Snowmass Summer Study, 3, 2022,2203.04902

  29. [37]

    Braaten and R

    E. Braaten and R. D. Pisarski,Soft Amplitudes in Hot Gauge Theories: A General Analysis, Nucl. Phys. B 337 (1990) 569

  30. [38]

    J. O. Andersen and M. Strickland,Resummation in hot field theories, Annals Phys. 317 (2005) 281 [hep-ph/0404164]. – 26 –

  31. [39]

    D. K. Hong,Aspects of high density effective theory in QCD, Nucl. Phys. B 582 (2000) 451 [hep-ph/9905523]

  32. [40]

    Schäfer,Hard loops, soft loops, and high density effective field theory, Nucl

    T. Schäfer,Hard loops, soft loops, and high density effective field theory, Nucl. Phys. A728 (2003) 251 [hep-ph/0307074]

  33. [41]

    C. R. Allton, S. Ejiri, S. J. Hands, O. Kaczmarek, F. Karsch, E. Laermann et al.,The QCD thermal phase transition in the presence of a small chemical potential, Phys. Rev. D66 (2002) 074507 [hep-lat/0204010]

  34. [42]

    C. R. Allton, M. Doring, S. Ejiri, S. J. Hands, O. Kaczmarek, F. Karsch et al., Thermodynamics of two flavor QCD to sixth order in quark chemical potential, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 054508 [hep-lat/0501030]

  35. [43]

    R. V. Gavai and S. Gupta,QCD at finite chemical potential with six time slices, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 114503 [0806.2233]

  36. [44]

    Kaczmarek, F

    O. Kaczmarek, F. Karsch, E. Laermann, C. Miao, S. Mukherjee, P. Petreczky et al.,Phase boundary for the chiral transition in (2+1) -flavor QCD at small values of the chemical potential, Phys. Rev. D83 (2011) 014504 [1011.3130]

  37. [45]

    Dagotto, A

    E. Dagotto, A. Moreo, R. L. Sugar and D. Toussaint,Binding of Holes in the Hubbard Model, Phys. Rev. B41 (1990) 811

  38. [46]

    Hasenfratz and D

    A. Hasenfratz and D. Toussaint,Canonical ensembles and nonzero density quantum chromodynamics, Nucl. Phys. B 371 (1992) 539

  39. [47]

    M. G. Alford, A. Kapustin and F. Wilczek,Imaginary chemical potential and finite fermion density on the lattice, Phys. Rev. D59 (1999) 054502 [hep-lat/9807039]

  40. [48]

    de Forcrand and O

    P. de Forcrand and O. Philipsen,The QCD phase diagram for small densities from imaginary chemical potential, Nucl. Phys. B 642 (2002) 290 [hep-lat/0205016]

  41. [49]

    D’Elia and M.-P

    M. D’Elia and M.-P. Lombardo,Finite density QCD via imaginary chemical potential, Phys. Rev. D67 (2003) 014505 [hep-lat/0209146]

  42. [50]

    P. N. Meisinger and M. C. Ogilvie,PT Symmetry in Classical and Quantum Statistical Mechanics, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A371 (2013) 20120058 [1208.5077]

  43. [51]

    M. A. Schindler, S. T. Schindler, L. Medina and M. C. Ogilvie,Universality of Pattern Formation, Phys. Rev. D102 (2020) 114510 [1906.07288]

  44. [52]

    M. A. Schindler, S. T. Schindler and M. C. Ogilvie,PT symmetry, pattern formation, and finite-density QCD, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.2038 (2021) [ 2106.07092]

  45. [53]

    C. M. Bender and S. Boettcher,Real spectra in nonHermitian Hamiltonians having PT symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett.80 (1998) 5243 [physics/9712001]

  46. [54]

    C. M. Bender, P. E. Dorey, C. Dunning, A. Fring, D. W. Hook, H. F. Jones et al.,PT Symmetry: in Quantum and Classical Physics. WORLD SCIENTIFIC (EUROPE), 2019, 10.1142/q0178, [https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/pdf/10.1142/q0178]

  47. [55]

    C. M. Bender and D. W. Hook,PT-symmetric quantum mechanics, Rev. Mod. Phys.96 (2023) 045002 [2312.17386]

  48. [56]

    V. V. Konotop, J. Yang and D. A. Zezyulin,Nonlinear waves inPT -symmetric systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.88 (2016) 035002

  49. [57]

    L. Feng, R. El-Ganainy and L. Ge,Non-hermitian photonics based on parity–time symmetry, Nature Photonics 11 (2017) 752. – 27 –

  50. [58]

    S. K. Ozdemir, S. Rotter, F. Nori and L. Yang,Parity–time symmetry and exceptional points in photonics, Nature Materials 18 (2019) 783

  51. [59]

    Miri and A

    M.-A. Miri and A. Alù,Exceptional points in optics and photonics, Science 363 (2019)

  52. [60]

    Ashida, Z

    Y. Ashida, Z. Gong and M. Ueda,Non-Hermitian physics, Adv. Phys. 69 (2021) 249 [2006.01837]

  53. [61]

    K. Ding, C. Fang and G. Ma,Non-Hermitian topology and exceptional-point geometries, Nature Rev. Phys.4 (2022) 745 [2204.11601]

  54. [62]

    C. M. Bender,Making sense of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians, Rept. Prog. Phys.70 (2007) 947 [hep-th/0703096]

  55. [63]

    C. M. Bender, D. C. Brody and H. F. Jones,Must a Hamiltonian be Hermitian?, Am. J. Phys. 71 (2003) 1095 [hep-th/0303005]

  56. [64]

    C. M. Bender, S. F. Brandt, J.-H. Chen and Q.-h. Wang,Ghost busting: PT-symmetric interpretation of the Lee model, Phys. Rev. D71 (2005) 025014 [hep-th/0411064]

  57. [65]

    C. M. Bender and P. D. Mannheim,No-ghost theorem for the fourth-order derivative Pais-Uhlenbeck oscillator model, Phys. Rev. Lett.100 (2008) 110402 [0706.0207]

  58. [66]

    E. A. Ivanov and A. V. Smilga,Cryptoreality of nonanticommutative Hamiltonians, JHEP 07 (2007) 036 [hep-th/0703038]

  59. [67]

    Curtright, E

    T. Curtright, E. Ivanov, L. Mezincescu and P. K. Townsend,Planar super-Landau models revisited, JHEP 04 (2007) 020 [hep-th/0612300]

  60. [68]

    Curtright and A

    T. Curtright and A. Veitia,Quasi-hermitian quantum mechanics in phase space, J. Math. Phys. 48 (2007) 102112 [quant-ph/0701006]

  61. [69]

    W.-Y. Ai, C. M. Bender and S. Sarkar,PT-symmetric -gφ4 theory, Phys. Rev. D106 (2022) 125016 [2209.07897]

  62. [70]

    Lawrence, R

    S. Lawrence, R. Weller, C. Peterson and P. Romatschke,Instantons, analytic continuation, and PT-symmetric field theory, Phys. Rev. D108 (2023) 085013 [2303.01470]

  63. [71]

    Romatschke,Life at the Landau pole, AppliedMath 4 (2024) 55 [2212.03254]

    P. Romatschke,Life at the Landau pole, AppliedMath 4 (2024) 55 [2212.03254]

  64. [72]

    C. M. Bender, N. Hassanpour, S. P. Klevansky and S. Sarkar,P T-symmetric quantum field theory in D dimensions, Phys. Rev. D98 (2018) 125003 [1810.12479]

  65. [73]

    C. M. Bender, C. Karapoulitidis and S. P. Klevansky,Underdetermined Dyson-Schwinger Equations, Phys. Rev. Lett.130 (2023) 101602 [2211.13026]

  66. [74]

    Alexandre, P

    J. Alexandre, P. Millington and D. Seynaeve,Symmetries and conservation laws in non-Hermitian field theories, Phys. Rev. D96 (2017) 065027 [1707.01057]

  67. [75]

    Felski, C

    A. Felski, C. M. Bender, S. P. Klevansky and S. Sarkar,Towards perturbative renormalization of ϕ2(iϕ)ϵ quantum field theory, Phys. Rev. D104 (2021) 085011 [2103.07577]

  68. [76]

    C. M. Bender, A. Felski, S. P. Klevansky and S. Sarkar,P TSymmetry and Renormalisation in Quantum Field Theory, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.2038 (2021) 012004 [2103.14864]

  69. [77]

    Fring and T

    A. Fring and T. Taira,Complex BPS solitons with real energies from duality, J. Phys. A53 (2020) 455701 [2007.15425]

  70. [78]

    Fring and T

    A. Fring and T. Taira,Non-Hermitian gauge field theories and BPS limits, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2038 (2021) 012010 [2103.13519]. – 28 –

  71. [79]

    Correa, A

    F. Correa, A. Fring and T. Taira,Complex BPS Skyrmions with real energy, Nucl. Phys. B 971 (2021) 115516 [2102.05781]

  72. [80]

    M. N. Chernodub,The Nielsen-Ninomiya theorem,PT -invariant non-Hermiticity and single 8-shaped Dirac cone, J. Phys. A50 (2017) 385001 [1701.07426]

  73. [81]

    Jones-Smith and H

    K. Jones-Smith and H. Mathur,Relativistic Non-Hermitian Quantum Mechanics, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 125014 [0908.4257]

  74. [82]

    Ohlsson,Non-Hermitian neutrino oscillations in matter with PT symmetric Hamiltonians, EPL 113 (2016) 61001 [1509.06452]

    T. Ohlsson,Non-Hermitian neutrino oscillations in matter with PT symmetric Hamiltonians, EPL 113 (2016) 61001 [1509.06452]

  75. [83]

    Chen and S

    L. Chen and S. Sarkar,PT symmetric fermionic particle oscillations in even dimensional representations, 2407.02036

  76. [84]

    Alexandre, C

    J. Alexandre, C. M. Bender and P. Millington,Non-Hermitian extension of gauge theories and implications for neutrino physics, JHEP 11 (2015) 111 [1509.01203]

  77. [85]

    Alexandre, N

    J. Alexandre, N. E. Mavromatos and A. Soto,Dynamical Majorana neutrino masses and axions I, Nucl. Phys. B 961 (2020) 115212 [2004.04611]

  78. [86]

    N. E. Mavromatos and A. Soto,Dynamical Majorana neutrino masses and axions II: Inclusion of anomaly terms and axial background, Nucl. Phys. B 962 (2021) 115275 [2006.13616]

  79. [87]

    Alexandre and N

    J. Alexandre and N. E. Mavromatos,On the consistency of a non-Hermitian Yukawa interaction, Phys. Lett. B807 (2020) 135562 [2004.03699]

  80. [88]

    N. E. Mavromatos, S. Sarkar and A. Soto,PT symmetric fermionic field theories with axions: Renormalization and dynamical mass generation, Phys. Rev. D106 (2022) 015009 [2111.05131]

  81. [89]

    N. E. Mavromatos, S. Sarkar and A. Soto,Schwinger-Dyson equations and mass generation for an axion theory with a PT symmetric Yukawa fermion interaction, Nucl. Phys. B 986 (2023) 116048 [2208.12436]

  82. [90]

    M. C. Ogilvie, M. A. Schindler and S. T. Schindler,Finite-density QCD, PT symmetry, and dual algorithms, PoS LA TTICE2021(2022) 417 [2110.14009]

  83. [91]

    P. D. Mannheim,Making the Case for Conformal Gravity, Found. Phys. 42 (2012) 388 [1101.2186]

  84. [92]

    Nishimura, M

    H. Nishimura, M. C. Ogilvie and K. Pangeni,Complex saddle points in QCD at finite temperature and density, Phys. Rev. D90 (2014) 045039 [1401.7982]

  85. [93]

    Nishimura, M

    H. Nishimura, M. C. Ogilvie and K. Pangeni,Complex Saddle Points and Disorder Lines in QCD at finite temperature and density, Phys. Rev. D91 (2015) 054004 [1411.4959]

  86. [94]

    Nishimura, M

    H. Nishimura, M. C. Ogilvie and K. Pangeni,Complex spectrum of finite-density lattice QCD with static quarks at strong coupling, Phys. Rev. D93 (2016) 094501 [1512.09131]

  87. [95]

    Nishimura, M

    H. Nishimura, M. C. Ogilvie and K. Pangeni,Liquid-Gas Phase Transitions andCK Symmetry in Quantum Field Theories, Phys. Rev. D95 (2017) 076003 [1612.09575]

  88. [96]

    M. A. Schindler, S. T. Schindler and M. C. Ogilvie,Finite-density QCD, PT symmetry, and exotic phases, PoS LA TTICE2021(2022) 555 [2110.07761]

  89. [97]

    P. N. Meisinger and M. C. Ogilvie,The sign problem and Abelian lattice duality, PoS LA TTICE2013(2014) 205 [1311.5515]. – 29 –

  90. [98]

    A. L. Fetter and J. D. Walecka,Quantum theory of many-particle systems. Courier Corporation, 2012

  91. [99]

    J. I. Kapusta and T. Toimela,Friedel Oscillations in Relativistic QED and QCD, Phys. Rev. D 37 (1988) 3731

  92. [100]

    R. D. Pisarski and F. Rennecke,Signatures of Moat Regimes in Heavy-Ion Collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett.127 (2021) 152302 [2103.06890]

  93. [101]

    S. Pu, A. C. Balrma, J. Taylor, E. Fradkin and Z. Papic,Microscopic model for fractional quantum hall nematics, Phys. Rev. Lett.132 (2024) 236503

  94. [102]

    T. A. Sedrakyan, L. I. Glazman and A. Kamenev,Absence of bose condensation on lattices with moat bands, Phys. Rev. B89 (2014) 201112(R)

  95. [103]

    Stephenson,Ising Model with Antiferromagnetic Next-Nearest-Neighbor Coupling: Spin Correlations and Disorder Points, Physical Review B1 (1970) 4405

    J. Stephenson,Ising Model with Antiferromagnetic Next-Nearest-Neighbor Coupling: Spin Correlations and Disorder Points, Physical Review B1 (1970) 4405

  96. [104]

    S. W. Hui and N. B. He,Molecular organization in cholesterol-lecithin bilayers by x-ray and electron diffraction measurements, Biochemistry 22 (1983) 1159

  97. [105]

    F. C. Frank and J. S. Kasper,Complex alloy structures regarded as sphere packings. i. definitions and basic principles, Acta Cryst. 11 (1958)

  98. [106]

    D. R. Nelson,Order, frustration, and defects in liquids and glasses, Phys. Rev. B28 (1983) 5515

  99. [107]

    Mossseri and J

    R. Mossseri and J. F. Sadoc,Hierarchical structure of defects in non-crystalline sphere packings, J. Phys. (Paris) Lett.45 (1984) L827

  100. [108]

    J. P. Sethna,Frustration, curvature, and defect lines in metallic glasses and the cholesteric blue phase, Phys. Rev. B31 (1985) 6278

  101. [109]

    Nussinov,Avoided phase transitions and glassy dynamics in geometrically frustrated systems and non-abelian theories, Phys

    Z. Nussinov,Avoided phase transitions and glassy dynamics in geometrically frustrated systems and non-abelian theories, Phys. Rev. B69 (2004) 014208

  102. [110]

    Tarjus, S

    G. Tarjus, S. A. Kivelson, Z. Nussinov and P. Viot,The frustration-based approach of supercooled liquids and the glass transition: a review and critical assessment, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 17 (2005) R1143

  103. [111]

    Schmalian and P

    J. Schmalian and P. G. Wolynes,Stripe glasses: Self-generated randomness in a uniformly frustrated system, Phys. Rev. Lett.85 (2000) 836

  104. [112]

    S. A. Brazovskii and S. G. Dmitriev,Phase transitions in cholesteric liquid crystals, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.69 (1975) 979

  105. [113]

    B. Ma, B. Yao, T. Ye and M. Lei,Prediction of optical modulation properties of twisted-nematic liquid-crystal display by improved measurement of Jones matrix, Journal of Applied Physics 107 (2010) 073107

  106. [114]

    J. V. Selinger,Director deformations, geometric frustration, and modulated phases in liquid crystals, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics13 (2022) 49

  107. [115]

    Mesaros, K

    A. Mesaros, K. Fujita, H. Eisaki, S. Uchida, J. C. Davis, S. Sachdev et al.,Topological defects coupling smectic modulations to intra–unit-cell nematicity in cuprates, Science 333 (2011) 426

  108. [116]

    R. E. PeierlsHelv. Phys. Acta Suppl.7 (1934) 81. – 30 –

  109. [117]

    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz,Statistical Physics, Course of Theoretical Physics (volume

  110. [118]

    Addison-Wesley, 1969

    second edition. Addison-Wesley, 1969

  111. [119]

    P. G. de Gennes,The Physics of Liquid Crystals. Clarendon, Oxford, 1974

  112. [120]

    Als-Nielsen, J

    J. Als-Nielsen, J. D. J. D. Litster, R. J. Birgeneau, M. Kaplan, C. R. Safinya, A. Lindegaard-Andersen et al.,Observation of algebraic decay of positional order in a smectic liquid crystal, Phys. Rev. B22 (1980) 312

  113. [121]

    S. A. Kivelson, E. Fradkin and V. J. Emery,Electronic liquid-crystal phases of a doped mott insulator, Nature 393 (1998) 550

  114. [122]

    J. M. Tranquada, B. J. Sternlieb, J. D. Axe, Y. Nakamura and S. Uchida,Evidence for stripe correlations of spins and holes in copper oxide superconductors, Nature 375 (1995) 561

  115. [123]

    Emery and S

    V. Emery and S. Kivelson,Frustrated electronic phase separation and high-temperature superconductors, Physica C: Superconductivity209 (1993) 597

  116. [124]

    U. Löw, V. J. Emery, K. Fabricius and S. A. Kivelson,Study of an ising model with competing long- and short-range interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.72 (1994) 1918

  117. [125]

    J. C. Phillips, A. Saxena and A. R. Bishop,Pseudogaps, dopants, and strong disorder in cuprate high-temperature superconductors, Reports on Progress in Physics66 (2003) 2111

  118. [126]

    Valdez-Balderas and D

    D. Valdez-Balderas and D. Stroud,Superconductivity versus phase separation, stripes, and checkerboard ordering: A two-dimensional monte carlo study, Phys. Rev. B72 (2005) 214501

  119. [127]

    Mertelj, V

    T. Mertelj, V. V. Kabanov and D. Mihailovic,Charged particles on a two-dimensional lattice subject to anisotropic jahn-teller interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.94 (2005) 147003

  120. [128]

    Yamada, C

    K. Yamada, C. H. Lee, K. Kurahashi, J. Wada, S. Wakimoto, S. Ueki et al.,Doping dependence of the spatially modulated dynamical spin correlations and the superconducting-transition temperature inla2−x srxcuo4, Phys. Rev. B57 (1998) 6165

  121. [129]

    S. R. White and D. J. Scalapino,Density matrix renormalization group study of the striped phase in the 2dt − J model, Phys. Rev. Lett.80 (1998) 1272

  122. [130]

    Zaanen and O

    J. Zaanen and O. Gunnarsson,Charged magnetic domain lines and the magnetism of high-Tc oxides, Phys. Rev. B40 (1989) 7391

  123. [131]

    Machida,Magnetism in la2cuo4 based compounds, Physica C: Superconductivity158 (1989) 192

    K. Machida,Magnetism in la2cuo4 based compounds, Physica C: Superconductivity158 (1989) 192

  124. [132]

    M. P. Lilly, K. B. Cooper, J. P. Eisenstein, L. N. Pfeiffer and K. W. West,Evidence for an anisotropic state of two-dimensional electrons in high landau levels, Phys. Rev. Lett.82 (1999) 394

  125. [133]

    Fradkin and S

    E. Fradkin and S. A. Kivelson,Liquid-crystal phases of quantum hall systems, Phys. Rev. B 59 (1999) 8065

  126. [134]

    M. M. Fogler, A. A. Koulakov and B. I. Shklovskii,Ground state of a two-dimensional electron liquid in a weak magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B54 (1996) 1853

  127. [135]

    Moessner and J

    R. Moessner and J. T. Chalker,Exact results for interacting electrons in high landau levels, Phys. Rev. B54 (1996) 5006

  128. [136]

    A. A. Koulakov, M. M. Fogler and B. I. Shklovskii,Charge density wave in two-dimensional electron liquid in weak magnetic field, Phys. Rev. Lett.76 (1996) 499. – 31 –

  129. [137]

    R. Du, D. Tsui, H. Stormer, L. Pfeiffer, K. Baldwin and K. West,Strongly anisotropic transport in higher two-dimensional landau levels, Solid State Communications109 (1999) 389

  130. [138]

    Seul and R

    M. Seul and R. Wolfe,Evolution of disorder in magnetic stripe domains. i. transverse instabilities and disclination unbinding in lamellar patterns, Phys. Rev. A46 (1992) 7519

  131. [139]

    A. D. Stoycheva and S. J. Singer,Computer simulations of a two-dimensional system with competing interactions, Phys. Rev. E 65 (2002) 036706

  132. [140]

    Lawes, M

    G. Lawes, M. Kenzelmann, N. Rogado, K. H. Kim, G. A. Jorge, R. J. Cava et al., Competing magnetic phases on a kagomé staircase, Phys. Rev. Lett.93 (2004) 247201

  133. [141]

    Malescio and G

    G. Malescio and G. Pellicane,Stripe phases from isotropic repulsive interactions, Nature Materials 2 (2003) 97

  134. [142]

    Malescio and G

    G. Malescio and G. Pellicane,Stripe patterns in two-dimensional systems with core-corona molecular architecture, Phys. Rev. E 70 (2004) 021202

  135. [143]

    M. A. Glaser, G. M. Grason, R. D. Kamien, A. Košmrlj, C. D. Santangelo and P. Ziherl, Soft spheres make more mesophases, Europhysics Letters 78 (2007) 46004

  136. [144]

    C. J. Olson Reichhardt, C. Reichhardt and A. R. Bishop,Fibrillar templates and soft phases in systems with short-range dipolar and long-range interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.92 (2004) 016801

  137. [145]

    K. L. Babcock and R. M. Westervelt,Elements of cellular domain patterns in magnetic garnet films, Phys. Rev. A40 (1989) 2022

  138. [146]

    Chakrabarty and Z

    S. Chakrabarty and Z. Nussinov,High temperature correlation functions: universality, extraction of exchange interactions, divergent correlation lengths and generalized debye length scales, Physical Review B84 (2011) 064124

  139. [147]

    Różycki, T

    B. Różycki, T. R. Weikl and R. Lipowsky,Stable patterns of membrane domains at corrugated substrates, Phys. Rev. Lett.100 (2008) 098103

  140. [148]

    Giuliani, J

    A. Giuliani, J. L. Lebowitz and E. H. Lieb,Striped phases in two-dimensional dipole systems, Phys. Rev. B76 (2007) 184426

  141. [149]

    Vindigni, N

    A. Vindigni, N. Saratz, O. Portmann, D. Pescia and P. Politi,Stripe width and nonlocal domain walls in the two-dimensional dipolar frustrated ising ferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B77 (2008) 092414

  142. [150]

    F. S. Bates and G. H. Fredrickson,Block Copolymers—Designer Soft Materials, Physics Today 52 (1999) 32

  143. [151]

    Leibler,Theory of microphase separation in block copolymers, Macromolecules 13 (1980) 1602

    L. Leibler,Theory of microphase separation in block copolymers, Macromolecules 13 (1980) 1602

  144. [152]

    F. S. Bates, J. H. Rosedale and G. H. Fredrickson,Fluctuation effects in a symmetric diblock copolymer near the order–disorder transition, The Journal of Chemical Physics92 (1990) 6255

  145. [153]

    Ciach, J

    A. Ciach, J. Pękalski and W. T. Góźdź,Origin of similarity of phase diagrams in amphiphilic and colloidal systems with competing interactions, Soft Matter 9 (2013) 6301

  146. [154]

    P. N. Timonin and G. Y. Chitov,Disorder lines, modulation, and partition function zeros in free fermion models, Phys. Rev. B104 (2021) 045106. – 32 –

  147. [155]

    Kalisky, J

    B. Kalisky, J. R. Kirtley, J. G. Analytis, J.-H. Chu, A. Vailionis, I. R. Fisher et al.,Stripes of increased diamagnetic susceptibility in underdoped superconducting Ba(Fe1−xCox)2as2 single crystals: Evidence for an enhanced superfluid density at twin boundaries, Phys. Rev. B ...

  148. [156]

    J. R. Kirtley, B. Kalisky, L. Luan and K. A. Moler,Meissner response of a bulk superconductor with an embedded sheet of reduced penetration depth, Phys. Rev. B81 (2010) 184514

  149. [157]

    Cheong, G

    S.-W. Cheong, G. Aeppli, T. E. Mason, H. Mook, S. M. Hayden, P. C. Canfield et al., Incommensurate magnetic fluctuations inla2−x srx cuo4, Phys. Rev. Lett.67 (1991) 1791

  150. [158]

    D. I. Golosov,Magnetic domain walls in single-phase and phase-separated double-exchange systems, Phys. Rev. B67 (2003) 064404

  151. [159]

    M. B. Salamon and M. Jaime,The physics of manganites: Structure and transport, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73 (2001) 583

  152. [160]

    Zaanen,Stripes defeat the fermi liquid, Nature 404 (2000) 714

    J. Zaanen,Stripes defeat the fermi liquid, Nature 404 (2000) 714

  153. [161]

    S. A. Kivelson, I. P. Bindloss, E. Fradkin, V. Oganesyan, J. M. Tranquada, A. Kapitulnik et al.,How to detect fluctuating stripes in the high-temperature superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75 (2003) 1201

  154. [162]

    R. J. Elliott,Phenomenological discussion of magnetic ordering in the heavy rare-earth metals, Phys. Rev. 124 (1961) 346

  155. [163]

    M. E. Fisher and W. Selke,Infinitely many commensurate phases in a simple ising model, Phys. Rev. Lett.44 (1980) 1502

  156. [164]

    Selke,The annni model- theoretical analysis and experimental application, Physics Reports 170 (1988) 213

    W. Selke,The annni model- theoretical analysis and experimental application, Physics Reports 170 (1988) 213

  157. [165]

    Frenkel and T

    Y. Frenkel and T. Kontorova,The model of dislocation in solid body, Phys. Z. Sowietunion 13 (1938) 1

  158. [166]

    Bak,Commensurate phases, incommensurate phases and the devil's staircase, Reports on Progress in Physics45 (1982) 587

    P. Bak,Commensurate phases, incommensurate phases and the devil's staircase, Reports on Progress in Physics45 (1982) 587

  159. [167]

    Giuliani, J

    A. Giuliani, J. L. Lebowitz and E. H. Lieb,Ising models with long-range antiferromagnetic and short-range ferromagnetic interactions, Phys. Rev. B74 (2006) 064420

  160. [168]

    Ortix, J

    C. Ortix, J. Lorenzana and C. Di Castro,Frustrated phase separation in two-dimensional charged systems, Phys. Rev. B73 (2006) 245117

  161. [169]

    Daruka and Z

    I. Daruka and Z. Gulácsi,Correlation transitions in the ising chain with competing short-range and long-range mirror interactions, Phys. Rev. E 58 (1998) 5403

  162. [170]

    D. G. Barci and D. A. Stariolo,Orientational order in two dimensions from competing interactions at different scales, Phys. Rev. B79 (2009) 075437

  163. [171]

    V. L. Pokrovsky and A. L. Talapov,Ground state, spectrum, and phase diagram of two-dimensional incommensurate crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett.42 (1979) 65

  164. [172]

    S. A. Brazovskii,Phase transition of an isotropic system to a nonuniform state, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.68 (1975) 175

  165. [173]

    Chakrabarty, V

    S. Chakrabarty, V. Dobrosavljevic, A. Seidel and Z. Nussinov,Universality of modulation length (and time) exponents, Physical Review E86 (2012) 041132. – 33 –

  166. [174]

    Chakrabarty and Z

    S. Chakrabarty and Z. Nussinov,Modulation and correlations lengths in systems with competing interactions: new exponents and other universal features, Physical Review B84 (2011) 144402

  167. [175]

    Mukamel,Critical behaviour associated with helical order near a lifshitz point, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General10 (1977) L249

    D. Mukamel,Critical behaviour associated with helical order near a lifshitz point, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General10 (1977) L249

  168. [176]

    Seul and D

    M. Seul and D. Andelman,Domain shapes and patterns: The phenomenology of modulated phases, Science 267 (1995) 476

  169. [177]

    Reichhardt, C

    C. Reichhardt, C. J. Olson, I. Martin and A. R. Bishop,Depinning and dynamics of systems with competing interactions in quenched disorder, Europhysics Letters 61 (2003) 221

  170. [178]

    Reichhardt, C

    C. Reichhardt, C. J. O. Reichhardt, I. Martin and A. R. Bishop,Dynamical ordering of driven stripe phases in quenched disorder, Phys. Rev. Lett.90 (2003) 026401

  171. [179]

    C. J. Olson Reichhardt, C. Reichhardt and A. R. Bishop,Structural transitions, melting, and intermediate phases for stripe- and clump-forming systems, Phys. Rev. E 82 (2010) 041502

  172. [180]

    G. H. Derrick,Comments on nonlinear wave equations as models for elementary particles, J. Math. Phys.5 (1964) 1252

  173. [181]

    L. P. Pryadko, S. A. Kivelson, V. J. Emery, Y. B. Bazaliy and E. A. Demler,Topological doping and the stability of stripe phases, Phys. Rev. B60 (1999) 7541

  174. [182]

    Nussinov, I

    Z. Nussinov, I. Vekhter and A. V. Balatsky,Nonuniform glassy electronic phases from competing local orders, Phys. Rev. B79 (2009) 165122

  175. [183]

    Patel,Flux Tube Model Signals for Baryon Correlations in Heavy Ion Collisions, Phys

    A. Patel,Flux Tube Model Signals for Baryon Correlations in Heavy Ion Collisions, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 114019 [1111.0177]

  176. [184]

    Akerlund, P

    O. Akerlund, P. de Forcrand and T. Rindlisbacher,Oscillating propagators in heavy-dense QCD, JHEP 10 (2016) 055 [1602.02925]

  177. [185]

    Nussinov,O(n) spin systems, some general properties: A Generalized Mermin-Wagner-Coleman theorem, ground states, Peierls bounds, and dynamics, hep-ph/0105143

    Z. Nussinov,O(n) spin systems, some general properties: A Generalized Mermin-Wagner-Coleman theorem, ground states, Peierls bounds, and dynamics, hep-ph/0105143

  178. [186]

    Nussinov,Commensurate and incommensurate o(n) spin systems: Novel even-odd effects, a generalized mermin-wagner-coleman theorem, and ground states, 2004

    Z. Nussinov,Commensurate and incommensurate o(n) spin systems: Novel even-odd effects, a generalized mermin-wagner-coleman theorem, and ground states, 2004

  179. [187]

    Chakrabarty, V

    S. Chakrabarty, V. Dobrosavljević, A. Seidel and Z. Nussinov,Universality of modulation length and time exponents, Phys. Rev. E 86 (2012) 041132

  180. [188]

    R. D. Pisarski, A. M. Tsvelik and S. Valgushev,How transverse thermal fluctuations disorder a condensate of chiral spirals into a quantum spin liquid, Phys. Rev. D102 (2020) 016015 [2005.10259]

  181. [189]

    Winstel and S

    M. Winstel and S. Valgushev,Lattice study of disordering of inhomogeneous condensates and the Quantum Pion Liquid in effectiveO(N ) model, inExcited QCD 2024 Workshop, 3, 2024, 2403.18640

  182. [190]

    R. D. Pisarski, V. V. Skokov and A. M. Tsvelik,A Pedagogical Introduction to the Lifshitz Regime, Universe 5 (2019) 48 [2202.01036]

  183. [191]

    Thies and K

    M. Thies and K. Urlichs,Revised phase diagram of the Gross-Neveu model, Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 125015 [hep-th/0302092]. – 34 –

  184. [192]

    Basar and G

    G. Basar and G. V. Dunne,Self-consistent crystalline condensate in chiral Gross-Neveu and Bogoliubov-de Gennes systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.100 (2008) 200404 [0803.1501]

  185. [193]

    Basar and G

    G. Basar and G. V. Dunne,A Twisted Kink Crystal in the Chiral Gross-Neveu model, 0806.2659

  186. [194]

    J. Lenz, L. Pannullo, M. Wagner, B. Wellegehausen and A. Wipf,Inhomogeneous phases in the Gross-Neveu model in 1+1 dimensions at finite number of flavors, Phys. Rev. D101 (2020) 094512 [2004.00295]

  187. [195]

    Buballa, L

    M. Buballa, L. Kurth, M. Wagner and M. Winstel,Regulator dependence of inhomogeneous phases in the 2+1-dimensional Gross-Neveu model, Physical Review D103 (2021) [2012.09588]

  188. [196]

    Koenigstein, L

    A. Koenigstein, L. Pannullo, S. Rechenberger, M. J. Steil and M. Winstel,Detecting inhomogeneous chiral condensation from the bosonic two-point function in the (1 + 1)-dimensional Gross–Neveu model in the mean-field approximation*, J. Phys. A55 (2022) 375402 [2112.07024]

  189. [197]

    Pannullo, M

    L. Pannullo, M. Wagner and M. Winstel,Inhomogeneous Phases in the Chirally Imbalanced 2 + 1-Dimensional Gross-Neveu Model and Their Absence in the Continuum Limit, Symmetry 14 (2022) 265 [2112.11183]

  190. [198]

    J. J. Lenz, M. Mandl and A. Wipf,Inhomogeneities in the two-flavor chiral Gross-Neveu model, Phys. Rev. D105 (2022) 034512 [2109.05525]

  191. [199]

    J. J. Lenz and M. Mandl,Remnants of large-Nf inhomogeneities in the 2-flavor chiral Gross-Neveu model, PoS LA TTICE2021(2022) 415 [2110.12757]

  192. [200]

    Nonaka and K

    C. Nonaka and K. Horie,Inhomogeneous phases in the chiral Gross-Neveu model on the lattice, PoS LA TTICE2021(2022) 150 [2112.02261]

  193. [201]

    Winstel, L

    M. Winstel, L. Pannullo and M. Wagner,Phase diagram of the 2+1-dimensional Gross-Neveu model with chiral imbalance, PoS LA TTICE2021(2022) 381 [2109.04277]

  194. [202]

    Winstel,Spatially oscillating correlation functions in (2+1)-dimensional four-fermion models: The mixing of scalar and vector modes at finite density, Phys

    M. Winstel,Spatially oscillating correlation functions in (2+1)-dimensional four-fermion models: The mixing of scalar and vector modes at finite density, Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 034008 [2403.07430]

  195. [203]

    Koenigstein and M

    A. Koenigstein and M. Winstel,Revisiting the spatially inhomogeneous condensates in the (1 + 1)-dimensional chiral Gross–Neveu model via the bosonic two-point function in the infinite-N limit, J. Phys. A57 (2024) 335401 [2405.03459]

  196. [204]

    Basar, G

    G. Basar, G. V. Dunne and M. Thies,Inhomogeneous Condensates in the Thermodynamics of the Chiral NJL(2) model, Phys. Rev. D79 (2009) 105012 [0903.1868]

  197. [205]

    Carignano and M

    S. Carignano and M. Buballa,Inhomogeneous chiral condensates in three-flavor quark matter, Phys. Rev. D101 (2020) 014026 [1910.03604]

  198. [206]

    Pannullo, M

    L. Pannullo, M. Wagner and M. Winstel,Inhomogeneous phases in the 3+1-dimensional Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model and their dependence on the regularization scheme, PoS LA TTICE2022(2023) 156 [2212.05783]

  199. [207]

    Pannullo,Inhomogeneous condensation in the Gross-Neveu model in noninteger spatial dimensions 1≤d<3, Phys

    L. Pannullo,Inhomogeneous condensation in the Gross-Neveu model in noninteger spatial dimensions 1≤d<3, Phys. Rev. D108 (2023) 036022 [2306.16290]

  200. [208]

    Koenigstein and L

    A. Koenigstein and L. Pannullo,Inhomogeneous condensation in the Gross-Neveu model in – 35 – noninteger spatial dimensions1 ≤ d <3. II. Nonzero temperature and chemical potential, 2312.04904

  201. [209]

    T. F. Motta, J. Bernhardt, M. Buballa and C. S. Fischer,Toward a stability analysis of inhomogeneous phases in QCD, Phys. Rev. D108 (2023) 114019 [2306.09749]

  202. [210]

    Pannullo, M

    L. Pannullo, M. Wagner and M. Winstel,Regularization effects in the Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model: Strong scheme dependence of inhomogeneous phases and persistence of the moat regime, Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 076006 [2406.11312]

  203. [211]

    Carignano, D

    S. Carignano, D. Nickel and M. Buballa,Influence of vector interaction and Polyakov loop dynamics on inhomogeneous chiral symmetry breaking phases, Phys. Rev. D82 (2010) 054009 [1007.1397]

  204. [212]

    Pannullo and M

    L. Pannullo and M. Winstel,Absence of inhomogeneous chiral phases in 2+1-dimensional four-fermion and Yukawa models, 2305.09444

  205. [213]

    Carignano, M

    S. Carignano, M. Buballa and B.-J. Schaefer,Inhomogeneous phases in the quark-meson model with vacuum fluctuations, Phys. Rev. D90 (2014) 014033 [1404.0057]

  206. [214]

    Buballa and S

    M. Buballa and S. Carignano,Inhomogeneous chiral phases away from the chiral limit, Phys. Lett. B791 (2019) 361 [1809.10066]

  207. [215]

    Buballa, S

    M. Buballa, S. Carignano and L. Kurth,Inhomogeneous phases in the quark-meson model with explicit chiral-symmetry breaking, Eur. Phys. J. ST229 (2020) 3371 [2006.02133]

  208. [216]

    Haensch, F

    M. Haensch, F. Rennecke and L. von Smekal,Medium Induced Mixing and Critical Modes in QCD, 2308.16244

  209. [217]

    W.-j. Fu, J. M. Pawlowski and F. Rennecke,QCD phase structure at finite temperature and density, Phys. Rev. D101 (2020) 054032 [1909.02991]

  210. [218]

    Schon and M

    V. Schon and M. Thies,Emergence of Skyrme crystal in Gross-Neveu and ’t Hooft models at finite density, Phys. Rev. D62 (2000) 096002 [hep-th/0003195]

  211. [219]

    T. Kojo, Y. Hidaka, L. McLerran and R. D. Pisarski,Quarkyonic Chiral Spirals, Nucl. Phys. A 843 (2010) 37 [0912.3800]

  212. [220]

    Nussinov, M

    Z. Nussinov, M. C. Ogilvie, L. Pannullo, R. D. Pisarski, F. Rennecke, S. T. Schindler et al., Dilepton production from moaton quasiparticles, 2410.22418

  213. [221]

    R. D. Pisarski, F. Rennecke, A. Tsvelik and S. Valgushev,The Lifshitz Regime and its Experimental Signals, Nucl. Phys. A1005 (2021) 121910 [2005.00045]

  214. [222]

    Rennecke, R

    F. Rennecke, R. D. Pisarski and D. H. Rischke,Particle interferometry in a moat regime, Phys. Rev. D107 (2023) 116011 [2301.11484]

  215. [223]

    Fukushima, Y

    K. Fukushima, Y. Hidaka, K. Inoue, K. Shigaki and Y. Yamaguchi,Hanbury-Brown–Twiss signature for clustered substructures probing primordial inhomogeneity in hot and dense QCD matter, Phys. Rev. C 109 (2024) L051903 [2306.17619]

  216. [224]

    Banks, R

    T. Banks, R. Myerson and J. B. Kogut,Phase Transitions in Abelian Lattice Gauge Theories, Nucl. Phys. B 129 (1977) 493

  217. [225]

    Elitzur, R

    S. Elitzur, R. B. Pearson and J. Shigemitsu,Phase structure of discrete abelian spin and gauge systems, Phys. Rev. D19 (1979) 3698

  218. [226]

    D. Horn, M. Weinstein and S. Yankielowicz,Hamiltonian approach toz(n) lattice gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D19 (1979) 3715. – 36 –

  219. [227]

    J. V. José, L. P. Kadanoff, S. Kirkpatrick and D. R. Nelson,Renormalization, vortices, and symmetry-breaking perturbations in the two-dimensional planar model, Phys. Rev. B16 (1977) 1217

  220. [228]

    Ukawa, P

    A. Ukawa, P. Windey and A. H. Guth,Dual Variables for Lattice Gauge Theories and the Phase Structure of Z(N) Systems, Phys. Rev. D21 (1980) 1013

  221. [229]

    J. L. Cardy,Duality and the Theta Parameter in Abelian Lattice Models, Nucl. Phys. B205 (1982) 17

  222. [230]

    Ostlund,Incommensurate and commensurate phases in asymmetric clock models, Phys

    S. Ostlund,Incommensurate and commensurate phases in asymmetric clock models, Phys. Rev. B 24 (1981) 398

  223. [231]

    J. M. Yeomans and M. E. Fisher,Many commensurate phases in the chiral potts or asymmetric clock models, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics14 (1981) L835

  224. [232]

    D. A. Huse,Simple three-state model with infinitely many phases, Phys. Rev. B24 (1981) 5180

  225. [233]

    Selke and J

    W. Selke and J. M. Yeomans,A Monte Carlo study of the asymmetric clock or chiral Potts model in two dimensions, Zeitschrift for Physik B Condensed Matter46 (1982) 311

  226. [234]

    Yeomans,Low-temperature analysis of the p-state asymmetric clock model for general p, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics15 (1982) 7305

    J. Yeomans,Low-temperature analysis of the p-state asymmetric clock model for general p, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics15 (1982) 7305

  227. [235]

    Bak,Commensurate phases, incommensurate phases and the devil’s staircase, Reports on Progress in Physics45 (1982) 587

    P. Bak,Commensurate phases, incommensurate phases and the devil’s staircase, Reports on Progress in Physics45 (1982) 587

  228. [236]

    W. S. McCullough,Mean-field transfer-matrix analysis of the p-state chiral clock model, Physical Review B46 (1992) 5084

  229. [237]

    Asorey, J

    M. Asorey, J. G. Esteve and J. Salas,Exact renormalization group analysis of first order phase transitions in clock models, Phys. Rev. B48 (1993) 3626 [hep-lat/9305021]

  230. [238]

    Cantor,De la puissance des ensembles parfaits de points: Extrait d’une lettre adressée à l’éditeur, Acta Mathematica 4 (1900) 381

    G. Cantor,De la puissance des ensembles parfaits de points: Extrait d’une lettre adressée à l’éditeur, Acta Mathematica 4 (1900) 381

  231. [239]

    V. L. Berezinsky,Destruction of long range order in one-dimensional and two-dimensional systems having a continuous symmetry group. I. Classical systems, Sov. Phys. JETP 32 (1971) 493

  232. [240]

    J. M. Kosterlitz and D. J. Thouless,Ordering, metastability and phase transitions in two-dimensional systems, J. Phys. C 6 (1973) 1181

  233. [241]

    J. V. Jose, L. P. Kadanoff, S. Kirkpatrick and D. R. Nelson,Renormalization, vortices, and symmetry breaking perturbations on the two-dimensional planar model, Phys. Rev. B16 (1977) 1217

  234. [242]

    H. A. Kramers and G. H. Wannier,Statistics of the two-dimensional ferromagnet. Part 1., Phys. Rev. 60 (1941) 252

  235. [243]

    Savit,Duality in Field Theory and Statistical Systems, Rev

    R. Savit,Duality in Field Theory and Statistical Systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.52 (1980) 453

  236. [244]

    L. P. Kadanoff and H. Ceva,Determination of an opeator algebra for the two-dimensional Ising model, Phys. Rev. B3 (1971) 3918

  237. [245]

    M. C. Ogilvie and L. Medina,Simulation of Scalar Field Theories with Complex Actions, PoS LA TTICE2018(2018) 157 [1811.11112]. – 37 –

  238. [246]

    Kapustin and N

    A. Kapustin and N. Seiberg,Coupling a QFT to a TQFT and Duality, JHEP 04 (2014) 001 [1401.0740]

  239. [247]

    A. A. Migdal,Gauge Transitions in Gauge and Spin Lattice Systems, Sov. Phys. JETP 42 (1975) 743

  240. [248]

    A. A. Migdal,Recursion Equations in Gauge Theories, Sov. Phys. JETP 42 (1975) 413

  241. [249]

    L. P. Kadanoff,Variational principles and approximate renormalization group calculations, Phys. Rev. Lett.34 (1975) 1005

  242. [250]

    L. P. Kadanoff,Notes on migdal’s recursion formulas, Annals of Physics100 (1976) 359

  243. [251]

    L. P. Kadanoff,The application of renormalization group techniques to quarks and strings, Rev. Mod. Phys.49 (1977) 267

  244. [252]

    Derrida, L

    B. Derrida, L. De Seze and C. Itzykson,Fractal structure of zeros in hierarchical models, Journal of Statistical Physics33 (1983) 559

  245. [253]

    H. C. Ottinger,Two-dimensional iterated mapping for the mean-field theory of the chiral Potts model, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics16 (1983) L257

  246. [254]

    Elitzur,Impossibility of Spontaneously Breaking Local Symmetries, Phys

    S. Elitzur,Impossibility of Spontaneously Breaking Local Symmetries, Phys. Rev. D12 (1975) 3978

  247. [255]

    Svetitsky and L

    B. Svetitsky and L. G. Yaffe,Critical Behavior at Finite Temperature Confinement Transitions, Nucl. Phys. B 210 (1982) 423

  248. [256]

    Caracciolo and P

    S. Caracciolo and P. Menotti,Phases of Renormalized Lattice Gauge Theories With Fermions, Annals Phys. 122 (1979) 74

  249. [257]

    Menotti and E

    P. Menotti and E. Onofri,The Action of SU(N) Lattice Gauge Theory in Terms of the Heat Kernel on the Group Manifold, Nucl. Phys. B 190 (1981) 288

  250. [258]

    Brezin and J

    E. Brezin and J. Zinn-Justin,Renormalization of the nonlinear sigma model in 2 + epsilon dimensions. Application to the Heisenberg ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.36 (1976) 691

  251. [259]

    Friedan,Nonlinear Models in Two Epsilon Dimensions, Phys

    D. Friedan,Nonlinear Models in Two Epsilon Dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett.45 (1980) 1057

  252. [260]

    Bhanot and M

    G. Bhanot and M. Creutz,Variant Actions and Phase Structure in Lattice Gauge Theory, Phys. Rev. D24 (1981) 3212

  253. [261]

    K. M. Bitar, S. A. Gottlieb and C. K. Zachos,Phase Structure and Renormalization Trajectories of Lattice SU(2) Gauge Theory, Phys. Rev. D26 (1982) 2853. – 38 –

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.