Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 56 references

Higher-dimensional magnetic Skyrmions

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper proposes lifting magnetic Skyrmions from two dimensions to three by replacing the three-component magnetization with a four-component unit vector, and shows that the generalized Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction that stabilizes…

desk verdict New S3-target magnetic Skyrmion model with a symmetry-derived DMI and a genuine two-solution spectrum; the formal/numerical core is solid, but full stability against non-spherical β-DMI deformations and physical realizability remain open. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.12190 v2 pith:GP4F2CKV submitted 2024-11-19 cond-mat.mes-hall hep-thmath-phmath.MP

Sven Bjarke Gudnason , Stefano Bolognesi , Roberto Menta This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallhep-thmath-phmath.MP
keywords magneticSkyrmionshigher-dimensionalDzyaloshinskii-MoriyainteractionsphaleronssyntheticdimensionsSkyrmetermtopologicalsolitonschiralmagnetsS3targetspace
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes a three-dimensional analogue of the two-dimensional magnetic Skyrmion. In two dimensions a Skyrmion is a texture in a three-component unit magnetization vector, with target space $S^2$; the paper replaces this by a four-component unit vector, so the target space becomes $S^3$ and the texture can wrap three-dimensional space around a three-sphere with integer topological charge. It constructs the corresponding generalization of the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction and shows numerically that the simplest model has two spherically symmetric solitons: a stable Skyrmion with negative energy and a smaller, unstable sphaleron. Adding the standard Skyrme term enriches the spectrum to three solutions in a region of parameter space: a small metastable Skyrmion, an unstable sphaleron, and a large stable Skyrmion. If the four-dimensional magnetization can be engineered through a synthetic dimension, these would be magnetic Skyrmions living in three spatial dimensions rather than in two.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the generalized DMI tensor $\Theta_{abi}$, antisymmetric in two $SO(4)$ indices and carrying one spatial index, contracted with the $SO(4)$-invariant tensor $\epsilon^{abcd}$. Its role is to supply a first-order derivative term that can be negative, so that Derrick's theorem is evaded without a higher-derivative stabilizing term. The paper reduces $\Theta$ to its $SO(3)_{\rm diag}$-invariant standard form with two parameters $\alpha$ and $\beta$, inserts the hedgehog Ansatz, a radial profile $\chi(r)$ on $S^3$ with winding phase $\delta$, and reduces the field equations to one ordinary differential equation for $\chi(r)$. From the approximate energy $E(R)=c_2R-c_1\kappa R^2+c_0m^2R^3$, with the Skyrme term adding $c_4/(e^2R)$, it derives two virial radii $R_\pm$, the small one being the sphaleron and the large one the Skyrmion.

What would settle it

A direct test would be to engineer the proposed synthetic-dimension Hamiltonian and search for a localized, spherically symmetric texture carrying topological charge one with a four-component unit vector; the model predicts such a Skyrmion exists only for mass parameter $m \le m_{\rm crit}$, approximately $0.85$, $0.97$, and $1.02$ for potential powers $p=1$, $3/2$, and $2$, and that above that mass all charge-one configurations collapse. In the purely theoretical setting, failing to find two real fixed points of the energy functional $E(R)$ whenever $\tilde{\kappa} > \sqrt{3}$ would falsify the claimed Skyrmion-sphaleron pair.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction, which in two dimensions is linear in derivatives and uses the antisymmetric tensor $\epsilon^{iab}$, has an $SO(4)$-covariant generalization $\kappa\,\epsilon^{abcd}\Theta_{abi}\partial_i n_c n_d$, where $\Theta$ is a constant tensor carrying two target-space indices and one spatial index. Imposing a locked symmetry $SO(3)_{\rm diag}$ that rotates space together with an $SO(3)$ subgroup of the target leaves only two invariant structures, called the $\alpha$ and $\beta$ parts; under a spherically symmetric hedgehog Ansatz only the $\alpha$ part survives, and both Bloch-type and N\'eel-type generalizations reduce to the same term $\kappa(\chi'+\sin 2\chi/r)$. With kinetic, potential, and this DMI term, the Derrick scaling energy has two fixed points whenever the dimensionless coupling is large enough, producing a large stable Skyrmion and a small unstable sphaleron. The stable solution has negative energy, exists only below a critical mass $m_{\rm crit}$, and disappears at zero mass.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that a physical system can be built in which the magnetization is genuinely a four-component unit vector, using a synthetic dimension, since the paper's own construction of the exact Hamiltonian for that realization is left to future work.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the model is right, three-dimensional magnetic Skyrmions with an $S^3$ target space should exist as static localized textures whenever a four-component magnetization is available.
  • The simplest theory has no stable Skyrmion at zero mass or above a critical Zeeman mass, and the stable size diverges as the mass tends to zero, so experiments would need intermediate field strengths.
  • The hybrid model with the Skyrme term predicts three distinct topological-charge-one solutions in a narrow band of the parameter plane, with two coalescence lines and a triple point, so counting stable and unstable solutions in a realized system would be a sharp test.
  • The $\beta$ part of the DMI, invisible in spherical textures, governs the model's connection to Hopfions, and the sphaleron phenomenon is expected to appear in that Hopfion limit as well.
  • The anti-Skyrmion also exists but has higher energy than the Skyrmion, so chirality selects the Skyrmion, just as in two dimensions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This editor's inference: the Skyrmion-sphaleron pair should appear in any theory whose size-dependent energy has the qualitative form $R-\tilde{\kappa}R^2+R^3$, so the result is likely to transfer beyond the specific tensor $\Theta$ chosen here.
  • A testable consequence of the deformation limit is that materials already known to host Hopfions might also show a small, unstable Hopfion solution if a beta-like coupling is present; the paper expects this but leaves the quantitative study to future work.
  • One direct falsification route before any synthetic-dimension experiment would be to measure the energy of isolated topological-charge-one textures as a function of applied field, since the model predicts a critical field above which no isolated Skyrmion exists.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a three-dimensional generalization of chiral-magnet magnetic Skyrmions, replacing the S^2 target space by S^3 and the three-component magnetization by a four-component unit vector. Section 2.1 classifies the most general one-derivative SO(4) DMI tensor and reduces it under SO(3)_diag symmetry to two structures, the α and β parts; only α contributes to the spherically symmetric hedgehog. The resulting radial equation supports a large negative-energy solution (the '3D magnetic Skyrmion') and a small positive-energy solution (the 'magnetic sphaleron'), as anticipated by a Derrick/virial argument and found numerically by gradient flow and shooting. The restricted model without the kinetic term admits explicit algebraic profiles. Section 3 adds the Skyrme term and derives a Derrick phase diagram with regions hosting one, two, or three solutions, illustrated by numerical profiles. Section 4 discusses synthetic dimensions as a possible realization, and Section 5 connects the model to Hopfion models in a formal limit.

Significance. The paper's symmetry classification and Derrick scaling analysis are clean and rigorous, and the existence of the two radial solutions is supported by two independent numerical methods, with explicit restricted-model solutions as a useful check. If the spherical Skyrmion is confirmed stable against non-spherical perturbations, the paper introduces a genuinely new family of higher-dimensional chiral solitons and a nontrivial phase structure, of interest to both the magnetic-soliton and Skyrme-model communities. The main gaps are that stability is currently established only within the radially symmetric sector, and the condensed-matter realization through a synthetic dimension remains an acknowledged open problem rather than a demonstrated construction.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 2.2.2 and Sec. 5] The central claim that the spherical hedgehog is a stable Skyrmion is not supported by the analysis shown. Derrick scaling and gradient flow in the radial ODE (Eq. 2.47) probe only the radial sector, while the β-part of the SO(3)_diag DMI (Eq. 2.18) vanishes under angular integration for the symmetric ansatz (Eq. 2.41) but couples to non-spherical perturbations and could in principle lower the energy; the authors explicitly leave this possibility open in the Conclusion. The anti-Skyrmion comparison in Sec. 2.2.4 also uses only angularly integrated quantities. I ask for either a full three-dimensional relaxation of the field equations starting from the hedgehog with perturbations, or a linear-stability/fluctuation analysis around the spherical solution, or a clearly stated weakened claim that the solution is stable only within the radial sector.
  2. [Secs. 2.2.2 and 2.3.1] The numerical existence of the solutions is not documented with quantitative accuracy measures. The manuscript states only that gradient-flow and shooting results were cross-checked; no mesh sizes, tolerances, conservation residuals, or definitions of rmax and of the numerical criterion for mcrit are provided. This matters because the paper asserts that no solutions exist for m > mcrit and because the sphaleron is unstable, making the numerical determination of the two branches delicate. Please report these numerical controls so that Table 2 and the 'no solution' statements can be independently assessed.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 2.2.3, Eq. (2.60)] The p = 2 restricted-model profile is stated as χ = 2 arctan(r/2), which tends to π as r → ∞ and does not satisfy the boundary condition χ(∞) = 0; solving Eq. (2.57) with p = 2 gives χ = 2 arctan(2/r). Please check and correct.
  2. [Sec. 2.2.3, Eq. (2.58)] The p = 1 profile χ = π − arcsin(r/4) is defined only for r ≤ 4 and ends at χ = π/2; the continuation for r > 4 and the sense in which it satisfies the boundary condition at infinity should be specified explicitly, for instance by declaring it to be a compacton-type solution with an appropriate continuation.
  3. [Sec. 4 and Sec. 5] The synthetic-dimension realization is presented as a possibility, and the paper correctly notes that the exact Hamiltonian 'still needs to be worked out.' I recommend adding a sentence near the abstract or introduction clarifying that the condensed-matter realization is a conjecture, so that the central results are read as a theoretical soliton model.
  4. [Secs. 2.4 and 3.3] The statements that the Hopfion model should also possess a sphaleron or a small Hopfion are explicitly flagged as expectations; since no numerical or analytic evidence is given in this paper, I suggest labeling these as conjectures in the respective section headings or in a dedicated paragraph.
  5. [General] The figures would be more reproducible if the numerical parameters used (grid spacing, number of shooting steps, tolerance, and the criterion for declaring a solution converged) were collected in a short appendix or stated in the captions.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Skyrmion and sphaleron solutions are obtained by solving the reduced radial ODE numerically, not from fitted inputs or a self-citation chain.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is self-contained. The generalized DMI in Sec. 2.1 is constructed from an SO(4)-antisymmetric tensor Theta and an SO(3)_diag locking condition, yielding Eq. (2.18); the hedgehog Ansatz (2.38) then reduces the energy to the radial functional (2.46) and the Euler-Lagrange equation (2.47). The Skyrmion and sphaleron are found by solving this ODE numerically via gradient flow and shooting, with the sphaleron also motivated by the virial/scaling analysis of Sec. 2.3. No parameter is fitted to a subset of results and then reported as a prediction; m and p are scanned theory parameters. The restricted-model closed forms in Sec. 2.2.3 are stated to be 'formally identical' with Ref. [55] by the same group, but this is a post-solution consistency observation, not a load-bearing input. Ref. [31] is cited only as a preliminary investigation and does not force the model. The explicitly acknowledged limitations -- Sec. 5: 'Deformed solitons, however, may feel the presence of the beta-part of the DM term, which in principle could lower the mass of the soliton,' and Sec. 4: 'The details of whether the exact Hamiltonian corresponding to our model can be constructed, still needs to be worked out' -- are honest statements of missing non-spherical stability and experimental realization, not circular reductions. Therefore no circular step is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 3 invented entities

The paper introduces a new DMI-tensor interaction as a postulate (Eq. 2.7) and a 4D magnetization vector whose physical realization is speculative. The numerical solutions are not backed by rigorous existence proofs or experimental data, so the ledger lists these as axioms and ad hoc constructs.

free parameters (4)
  • m (mass parameter)
    Potential parameter m sets the strength of m^2(1-n.N)^p. Scanned in (0, mcrit] for p=1, 3/2, 2; not fitted to data.
  • p (potential power) = 1, 3/2, 2
    Chosen potential exponent for the Zeeman-type term.
  • e (Skyrme coupling) = values corresponding to 1/e^2 = 0.001, 0.0222714, etc.
    Coupling of the Skyrme term in the hybrid model; selected to explore the phase diagram.
  • κ (DMI coefficient)
    Coupling of the generalized DMI; scaled away by choosing length units, but it sets the energy scale.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption A 4D magnetization vector can be physically realized via a synthetic dimension.
    Sec. 4 proposes synthetic dimensions as a route, but states the exact Hamiltonian 'still needs to be worked out'.
  • ad hoc to paper The generalized DMI (2.7) with an antisymmetric Θ tensor is the correct first-order derivative interaction for the S3 target space.
    Introduced by the authors as the minimal generalization; no microscopic derivation from spin-orbit coupling.
  • domain assumption Spherically symmetric hedgehog solutions capture the key physics; the β-part of the DMI is negligible.
    Used in the ansatz (2.38) and justified by symmetric criticality for δ=0, but deformed solitons are not considered.
  • ad hoc to paper Numerical gradient-flow and shooting solutions approximate true field configurations.
    No rigorous existence proof; solutions are cross-checked between two methods but without quantified error bounds.
invented entities (3)
  • 3D magnetic Skyrmion with S3 target space
    purpose: Core new soliton stabilized by the generalized DMI
    No experimental observation; purely theoretical at this stage.
  • Magnetic sphaleron
    purpose: Unstable small soliton in the theory, required for the phase structure
    No experimental evidence; obtained numerically.
  • Small metastable Skyrmion
    purpose: Additional solution appearing when the Skyrme term is included
    No experimental evidence; numerical solution only.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Higher-dimensional magnetic Skyrmions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GP4F2CKV

@misc{pith2026241112190,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Higher-dimensional magnetic Skyrmions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GP4F2CKV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.12190}
}
abstract

We propose a generalization of the theory of magnetic Skyrmions in chiral magnets in two dimensions to a higher-dimensional theory with magnetic Skyrmions in three dimensions and an $S^3$ target space, requiring a 4-dimensional magnetization vector. A physical realization of our theory could be made using a synthetic dimension, recently promoted and realized in condensed matter physics. In the simplest incarnation of the theory, we find a Skyrmion and a sphaleron - the latter being an unstable soliton. Including also the Skyrme term in the theory enriches the spectrum to a small metastable Skyrmion, an unstable sphaleron and a large stable Skyrmion.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.12190 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Profile functions for 3D magnetic Skyrmions with higher-dimensional SO(3) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Energy density and topological charge density for 3D magnetic Skyrmions with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Profile functions for magnetic sphalerons with higher-dimensional SO(3) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (11 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Energy density and topological charge density for magnetic sphalerons with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) Sizes and (b) energies of magnetic sphalerons (bottom series) versus 3D [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The energy functional E(R) as function of the radius R, illustrating the unstable magnetic sphaleron fixed point at a small radius and the stable magnetic Skyrmion fixed point at a larger radius, for (a) m = 0.3 and (b) m = 0.7 both with the p = 1 potential. It is also…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The green shaded area of the phase diagram contains 3 solutions (a small [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (a) Three different solutions in the magnetic-QCD hybrid Skyrme model at the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: (a) Two different solutions in the magnetic-QCD hybrid Skyrme model at the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: (a) Two different solutions in the magnetic-QCD hybrid Skyrme model at the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: (a) The solution in the magnetic-QCD hybrid Skyrme model at the triple point [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: (a) The solution in the magnetic-QCD hybrid Skyrme model at the point in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Synthetic dimensions transform internal states or intrinsic properties into an [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Illustration of the magnetization vector in an example where the physical di [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_14.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    vortices

    A. N. Bogdanov and D. A. Yablonskii, Thermodynamically stable “vortices” in magnetically ordered crystals. The mixed state of magnets , Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics 68 (Jan., 1989) 101

    work page 1989

  2. [2]

    Bogdanov, New localized solutions of the nonlinear field equations , Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters 62 (Aug., 1995) 247

    A. Bogdanov, New localized solutions of the nonlinear field equations , Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters 62 (Aug., 1995) 247

    work page 1995

  3. [3]

    Nagaosa and Y

    N. Nagaosa and Y. Tokura, Topological properties and dynamics of magnetic skyrmions, Nat. Nanotechnol. 8 (2013) 899

    work page 2013

  4. [4]

    M¨ uhlbauer, B

    S. M¨ uhlbauer, B. Binz, F. Jonietz, C. Pfleiderer, A. Rosch, A. Neubauer, R. Georgii, and P. B¨ oni,Skyrmion lattice in a chiral magnet , Science 323 (2009), no. 5916 915–919

    work page 2009

  5. [5]

    X. Z. Yu, Y. Onose, N. Kanazawa, J. H. Park, J. H. Han, Y. Matsui, N. Nagaosa, and Y. Tokura, Real-space observation of a two-dimensional skyrmion crystal , Nature 465 (Jun, 2010) 901–904

    work page 2010

  6. [6]

    A. Fert, N. Reyren, and V. Cros, Magnetic skyrmions: advances in physics and potential applications, Nature Reviews Materials 2 (Jun, 2017) 17031

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    Everschor-Sitte, J

    K. Everschor-Sitte, J. Masell, R. M. Reeve, and M. Kl¨ aui, Perspective: Magnetic skyrmions—Overview of recent progress in an active research field , Journal of Applied Physics 124 (12, 2018) 240901

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    Luo and L

    S. Luo and L. You, Skyrmion devices for memory and logic applications , APL Materials 9 (05, 2021) 050901

    work page 2021

Show all 56 references
  1. [9]

    Psaroudaki, E

    C. Psaroudaki, E. Peraticos, and C. Panagopoulos, Skyrmion qubits: Challenges for future quantum computing applications , Applied Physics Letters 123 (12, 2023) 260501. 36

    2023

  2. [10]

    T. H. R. Skyrme, A non-linear field theory , Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 260 (1961), no. 1300 127–138

    1961

  3. [11]

    T. H. R. Skyrme, A unified field theory of mesons and baryons , Nuclear Physics 31 (1962) 556–569

    1962

  4. [12]

    Witten, Global Aspects of Current Algebra , Nucl

    E. Witten, Global Aspects of Current Algebra , Nucl. Phys. B 223 (1983) 422–432

    1983

  5. [13]

    Witten, Current Algebra, Baryons, and Quark Confinement , Nucl

    E. Witten, Current Algebra, Baryons, and Quark Confinement , Nucl. Phys. B 223 (1983) 433–444

    1983

  6. [14]

    Sakai and S

    T. Sakai and S. Sugimoto, Low energy hadron physics in holographic QCD , Prog. Theor. Phys. 113 (2005) 843–882, [ hep-th/0412141]

    2005 arXiv

  7. [15]

    U. K. R¨ oßler, A. N. Bogdanov, and C. Pfleiderer, Spontaneous skyrmion ground states in magnetic metals , Nature 442 (Aug, 2006) 797–801

    2006

  8. [16]

    Rossler, A

    U. Rossler, A. A. Leonov, and A. N. Bogdanov, Chiral Skyrmionic matter in non-centrosymmetric magnets, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 303 (2011) 012105, [arXiv:1009.4849]

    2011 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Ezawa, Compact Skyrmions, Merons and Bimerons in Thin Chiral Magnetic Films, Phys

    M. Ezawa, Compact Skyrmions, Merons and Bimerons in Thin Chiral Magnetic Films, Phys. Rev. B 83 (2011) 100408, [ arXiv:1010.4119]

    2011 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Banerjee, J

    S. Banerjee, J. Rowland, O. Erten, and M. Randeria, Skyrmions in two-dimensional chiral magnets, Phys. Rev. X 4 (2014), no. 3 031045, [ arXiv:1402.7082]

    2014 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Melcher, Chiral skyrmions in the plane , Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 470 (2014), no

    C. Melcher, Chiral skyrmions in the plane , Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 470 (2014), no. 2172 20140394

    2014

  12. [20]

    F. N. Rybakov and N. S. Kiselev, Chiral magnetic skyrmions with arbitrary topological charge, Phys. Rev. B 99 (2019), no. 6 064437, [ arXiv:1806.00782]

    2019 arXiv

  13. [21]

    B. J. Schroers, Gauged Sigma Models and Magnetic Skyrmions , SciPost Phys. 7 (2019), no. 3 030, [ arXiv:1905.06285]

    2019 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Barton-Singer, C

    B. Barton-Singer, C. Ross, and B. J. Schroers, Magnetic Skyrmions at Critical Coupling, Commun. Math. Phys. 375 (2020), no. 3 2259–2280, [ arXiv:1812.07268]

    2020 arXiv

  15. [23]

    V. M. Kuchkin, B. Barton-Singer, F. N. Rybakov, S. Bl¨ ugel, B. J. Schroers, and N. S. Kiselev, Magnetic skyrmions, chiral kinks and holomorphic functions , Phys. Rev. B 102 (2020), no. 14 144422, [ arXiv:2007.06260]

    2020 arXiv

  16. [24]

    C. Ross, N. Sakai, and M. Nitta, Skyrmion interactions and lattices in chiral magnets: analytical results , JHEP 02 (2021) 095, [ arXiv:2003.07147]. 37

    2021 arXiv

  17. [25]

    D. Hill, V. Slastikov, and O. Tchernyshyov, Chiral magnetism: a geometric perspective, SciPost Phys. 10 (2021) 078

    2021

  18. [26]

    Schroers, Solvable Models of Magnetic Skyrmions , in 11th International Symposium on Quantum Theory and Symmetries , 10, 2019

    B. Schroers, Solvable Models of Magnetic Skyrmions , in 11th International Symposium on Quantum Theory and Symmetries , 10, 2019. arXiv:1910.13907

    2019 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Amari, Y

    Y. Amari, Y. Akagi, S. B. Gudnason, M. Nitta, and Y. Shnir, CP2 skyrmion crystals in an SU(3) magnet with a generalized Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction , Phys. Rev. B 106 (2022), no. 10 L100406, [ arXiv:2204.01476]

    2022 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Hanada and N

    F. Hanada and N. Sawado, A baby Skyrme model with anisotropic DM interaction: Compact skyrmions revisited, Nucl. Phys. B 996 (2023) 116377, [arXiv:2303.15751]

    2023 arXiv

  21. [29]

    V. M. Kuchkin and N. S. Kiselev, Turning a chiral skyrmion inside out , Phys. Rev. B 101 (Feb, 2020) 064408

    2020

  22. [30]

    G. H. Derrick, Comments on nonlinear wave equations as models for elementary particles, J. Math. Phys. 5 (1964) 1252–1254

    1964

  23. [31]

    Menta, Magnetic skyrmions and possible extensions , ETD (Master Thesis) University of Pisa (2023)

    R. Menta, Magnetic skyrmions and possible extensions , ETD (Master Thesis) University of Pisa (2023)

    2023

  24. [32]

    G. E. Volovik and V. P. Mineev, Particle-like solitons in superfluid 3he phases , Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics 46 (1977) 401–404

    1977

  25. [33]

    G. E. Volovik, The Universe in a Helium Droplet . Oxford University Press, 02, 2009

    2009

  26. [34]

    Boada, A

    O. Boada, A. Celi, J. I. Latorre, and M. Lewenstein, Quantum simulation of an extra dimension, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (Mar, 2012) 133001

    2012

  27. [35]

    A. Celi, P. Massignan, J. Ruseckas, N. Goldman, I. B. Spielman, G. Juzeli¯ unas, and M. Lewenstein, Synthetic gauge fields in synthetic dimensions , Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (Jan, 2014) 043001

    2014

  28. [36]

    Ozawa, H

    T. Ozawa, H. M. Price, N. Goldman, O. Zilberberg, and I. Carusotto, Synthetic dimensions in integrated photonics: From optical isolation to four-dimensional quantum Hall physics , Phys. Rev. A 93 (2016), no. 4 043827, [ arXiv:1510.03910]

    2016 arXiv

  29. [37]

    H. M. Price, O. Zilberberg, T. Ozawa, I. Carusotto, and N. Goldman, Four-dimensional quantum hall effect with ultracold atoms , Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (Nov, 2015) 195303. 38

    2015

  30. [38]

    L. Yuan, Q. Lin, M. Xiao, and S. Fan, Synthetic dimension in photonics , Optica 5 (Nov, 2018) 1396–1405

    2018

  31. [39]

    Ozawa and H

    T. Ozawa and H. M. Price, Topological quantum matter in synthetic dimensions , Nature Reviews Physics 1 (May, 2019) 349–357

    2019

  32. [40]

    Y. Wang, H. M. Price, B. Zhang, and Y. D. Chong, Circuit implementation of a four-dimensional topological insulator, Nature Communications 11 (May, 2020) 2356

    2020

  33. [41]

    Price, Simulating four-dimensional physics in the laboratory , Physics Today 75 (04, 2022) 38–44

    H. Price, Simulating four-dimensional physics in the laboratory , Physics Today 75 (04, 2022) 38–44

    2022

  34. [42]

    K. R. A. Hazzard and B. Gadway, Synthetic dimensions , Physics Today 76 (04,

  35. [43]

    Arguello-Luengo, U

    J. Arguello-Luengo, U. Bhattacharya, A. Celi, R. W. Chhajlany, T. Grass, M. Plodzien, D. Rakshit, T. Salamon, P. Stornati, L. Tarruell, and M. Lewenstein, Synthetic dimensions for topological and quantum phases , Communications Physics 7 (May, 2024) 143

    2024

  36. [44]

    Sutcliffe, Skyrmion knots in frustrated magnets , Phys

    P. Sutcliffe, Skyrmion knots in frustrated magnets , Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017), no. 24 247203, [ arXiv:1705.10966]

    2017 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Sutcliffe, Hopfions in chiral magnets , J

    P. Sutcliffe, Hopfions in chiral magnets , J. Phys. A 51 (2018), no. 37 375401, [arXiv:1806.06458]

    2018 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Sutcliffe, Hopfions, Reviews in Mathematical Physics 30 (2018), no

    P. Sutcliffe, Hopfions, Reviews in Mathematical Physics 30 (2018), no. 08 1840017

    2018

  39. [47]

    J.-S. B. Tai and I. I. Smalyukh, Static Hopf Solitons and Knotted Emergent Fields in Solid-State Noncentrosymmetric Magnetic Nanostructures , Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018), no. 18 187201, [ arXiv:1806.00453]

    2018 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Y. Liu, R. K. Lake, and J. Zang, Binding a hopfion in a chiral magnet nanodisk , Phys. Rev. B 98 (Nov, 2018) 174437

    2018

  41. [49]

    P. J. Ackerman and I. I. Smalyukh, Static three-dimensional topological solitons in fluid chiral ferromagnets and colloids , Nature Materials 16 (Apr, 2017) 426–432

    2017

  42. [50]

    N. Kent, N. Reynolds, D. Raftrey, I. T. G. Campbell, S. Virasawmy, S. Dhuey, R. V. Chopdekar, A. Hierro-Rodriguez, A. Sorrentino, E. Pereiro, S. Ferrer, F. Hellman, P. Sutcliffe, and P. Fischer, Creation and observation of hopfions in magnetic multilayer systems , Nature Commu...

    2021

  43. [51]

    Dzyaloshinsky, A thermodynamic theory of “weak” ferromagnetism of antiferromagnetics, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 4 (1958), no

    I. Dzyaloshinsky, A thermodynamic theory of “weak” ferromagnetism of antiferromagnetics, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 4 (1958), no. 4 241–255

    1958

  44. [52]

    Moriya, Anisotropic superexchange interaction and weak ferromagnetism , Phys

    T. Moriya, Anisotropic superexchange interaction and weak ferromagnetism , Phys. Rev. 120 (Oct, 1960) 91–98

    1960

  45. [53]

    Moriya, New mechanism of anisotropic superexchange interaction , Phys

    T. Moriya, New mechanism of anisotropic superexchange interaction , Phys. Rev. Lett. 4 (Mar, 1960) 228–230

    1960

  46. [54]

    N. S. Manton, The Inevitability of Sphalerons in Field Theory , Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 377 (2019), no. 2161 20180327, [ arXiv:1903.11573]

    2019 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Bolognesi, S

    S. Bolognesi, S. B. Gudnason, and R. Menta, Magnetic skyrmions: From lumps to supercompactons, Phys. Rev. Res. 6 (Nov, 2024) 043162, [ arXiv:2406.03941]

    2024 arXiv

  48. [56]

    L. D. Faddeev, Quantization of solitons , Princeton preprint IAS-75 (1975) QS70. 40

    1975

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.