The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2411.12643 · v2 · pith:UYPYA65U · submitted 2024-11-19 · cs.LG · cs.AI· cs.CL

DLBacktrace: A Model Agnostic Explainability for any Deep Learning Models

Reviewed by Pithpith:UYPYA65Uopen to challenge →

classification cs.LG cs.AIcs.CL
keywords dlbacktracemodelmodelsdeepinterpretabilitylearningacrossarchitectures
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

The rapid growth of AI has led to more complex deep learning models, often operating as opaque "black boxes" with limited transparency in their decision-making. This lack of interpretability poses challenges, especially in high-stakes applications where understanding model output is crucial. This work highlights the importance of interpretability in fostering trust, accountability, and responsible deployment. To address these challenges, we introduce DLBacktrace, a novel, model-agnostic technique designed to provide clear insights into deep learning model decisions across a wide range of domains and architectures, including MLPs, CNNs, and Transformer-based LLM models. We present a comprehensive overview of DLBacktrace and benchmark its performance against established interpretability methods such as SHAP, LIME, and GradCAM. Our results demonstrate that DLBacktrace effectively enhances understanding of model behavior across diverse tasks. DLBacktrace is compatible with models developed in both PyTorch and TensorFlow, supporting architectures such as BERT, ResNet, U-Net, and custom DNNs for tabular data. The library is open-sourced and available at https://github.com/AryaXAI/DLBacktrace .

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Faithfulness to Refusal: A Causal Audit of Neuron Selectors

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A causal audit via neuron-row zeroing shows attribution methods (LRP, IG) faithfully identify dispensable neurons and can install refusal behavior, while rank-stability proxies systematically miss selector failures.