Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 7 minor 1 cited by

Database Design for SpExoDisks: A Database & Web Portal for Spectra of Exoplanet-Forming Disks

T0 review · 2 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that JWST mid-infrared disk spectra must be paired with high-resolution ground-based CO spectra, and demonstrates on FZ Tau that the pairing separates two gas components that space data alone blends into one degenerate fit.

desk verdict A useful, honest database-infrastructure paper; the science demo overclaims on the 'all JWST programs' point but the portal and roadmap are real. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.13308 v1 pith:HV4O66LW submitted 2024-11-20 astro-ph.IM astro-ph.EPastro-ph.SR

Caleb Wheeler III , Natalie R. Hinkel , Andrea Banzatti This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.IMastro-ph.EPastro-ph.SR
keywords AstronomydatabaseswebservicesProtoplanetarydisksComputationalmethodsExoplanetsInfraredspectroscopyJWST
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that a purpose-built, community-scoped database portal is a practical way to keep specialized astronomical data accessible, and it uses the SpExoDisks portal as a working example. Its more consequential claim is scientific: mid-infrared spectra of planet-forming disks taken by JWST are degenerate on their own, because line blending and limited spectral coverage cause simple fits to overestimate the gas temperature. The paper demonstrates, on the disk of FZ Tau, that adding high-resolution ground-based CO spectra from the same portal breaks the degeneracy, revealing two gas components with different temperatures and column densities. If the authors are right, SpExoDisks becomes a load-bearing resource for interpreting JWST disk programs, and the design roadmap it documents gives other subfields a template for building similar portals.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism on the data side is the SpExoDisks processing pipeline: raw spectra from eight instruments are read in, verified, and standardized; star names are resolved through an external name-resolution service into a single star ID; spectra are registered under human-readable spectrum IDs; and the curated data is served through a REST API backed by MySQL tables in third normal form. On the science side, the argument runs through the population (rotation) diagram of CO line fluxes plotted against upper-level energy $E_u$, where a straight-line slope encodes gas temperature and curvature encodes column density. Fitting the FZ Tau CO lines with a plane-parallel single-temperature slab model, with temperature $T$ and column density $N$ as free parameters, separates the narrow component ($T \approx 1180$ K, $N \approx 3\times10^{17}$ cm${}^{-2}$) from the broad component ($T \approx 1420$ K, $N \approx 10^{18}$ cm${}^{-2}$); the same diagram made from MIRI-MRS data alone flattens because of line blending and missing low-$J$ coverage, forcing an overestimated single temperature of about 2460 K and a much lower column density.

What would settle it

Re-observe the same CO $\nu=1-0$ lines of FZ Tau with a third instrument at comparable resolving power and build a rotation diagram from it; if no two-component structure appears, or if a cross-calibration check shows the iSHELL and MIRI-MRS flux scales disagree by more than the reported uncertainties, the claimed decomposition loses its foundation. A radiative-transfer fit of the combined data that removes the $T \approx 1180$ K / $T \approx 1420$ K split would likewise falsify the slab-model interpretation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The authors' central claim is that a community-scoped database portal uniting infrared spectra from many instruments can reveal structure in planet-forming disks that no single dataset provides, and that this combination is now required to interpret JWST observations. Using FZ Tau as an example, they combine high-resolution ground-based CO spectra from iSHELL with JWST MIRI-MRS spectra and show that the CO emission splits into two kinematic components: a narrow component with $T \approx 1180$ K and $N \approx 3\times10^{17}$ cm${}^{-2}$, and a broad component with $T \approx 1420$ K and $N \approx 10^{18}$ cm${}^{-2}$, which trace gas at different radii in the inner disk. Fitting the MIRI data alone, by contrast, blends the components and covers only the high-$J$ part of the band, yielding a degenerate single temperature of about 2460 K and a much lower column density. The paper concludes that JWST disk programs will need high-resolution ground-based CO spectra to obtain gas-emitting regions from resolved kinematics and to distinguish scenarios such as small inner disk cavities beyond ALMA's reach.

Load-bearing premise

The demonstration rests on the premise that a plane-parallel single-temperature slab model adequately represents the CO emission of FZ Tau, and that the flux calibrations of the ground-based and space instruments agree closely enough to combine their line fluxes on one excitation diagram.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • JWST MIRI-MRS disk spectra will require accompanying high-resolution ground-based CO spectra to separate optical-depth effects from temperature and column density, making SpExoDisks or an equivalent combined archive a practical necessity.
  • Resolved CO kinematics can distinguish scenarios such as small inner disk cavities that even ALMA cannot resolve.
  • A small team can build and maintain a specialty astronomy portal: after the initial build, roughly 80 hours of critical developer time per year keeps it healthy, and new spectra can be contextualized and available for download within 24 hours.
  • Exposing the same data through a browser application and a REST API supports interactive exploration, programmatic access, and future machine-learning applications without special downloads.
  • Standardizing all stellar parameters to single units and single ranked reference values makes the combined dataset searchable and comparable across instruments.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the FZ Tau result generalizes to other disks, some published MIRI-only temperature determinations from JWST's early cycles may be systematically inflated; revisiting those spectra with ground-based CO data could revise the inferred inner-disk temperatures and column densities.
  • The same ground-plus-space combined-view logic could be applied to water and organic molecules such as H2O, HCN, and C2H2 to map where different molecular emission regions sit in radius, although the paper itself demonstrates only CO.
  • The portal's roadmap could transfer to other subfields with heterogeneous, multi-instrument spectral data, such as time-domain spectroscopy, turning the paper's design decisions into a reusable pattern rather than a one-off site.
  • Anonymously accessible full-database downloads and a documented API position SpExoDisks to serve as training data for machine-learning models of disk spectra, a use the paper invites but does not itself test.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper describes the design, implementation, and public release of SpExoDisks, a web portal and database for infrared spectra of protoplanetary disks. It presents a generalized roadmap for building small specialty astronomy databases: defining project goals, contextualizing data through SIMBAD/Gaia/TIC, normalizing star names, standardizing units and references, choosing database software and an API architecture, and deploying the system in Docker on AWS. The final section presents a science application in which iSHELL and MIRI-MRS CO spectra of FZ Tau are combined in a population diagram and fit with slab models, followed by a broad statement that all JWST disk programs will need high-resolution ground-based CO spectra. The portal and source repositories are publicly accessible.

Significance. If the infrastructure description is accurate, the paper is a useful contribution to the astronomy database community. The portal is live and the code is public, so the main implementation claims can be checked; the treatment of star-name resolution, unit enforcement, and reference tracking addresses real practical pain points; and the API plus interactive plotting design lowers access barriers for both experts and novices. The paper is strongest as an experience report grounded in a working deployment. The science demonstration illustrates a genuine synergy between high-resolution ground-based and mid-IR space spectra, but the universal claim in §6 and the lack of uncertainty analysis in the fits go beyond what the presented evidence supports.

major comments (2)
  1. [§6, final paragraph] The sentence "All the JWST disk programs in Cycle 1 and beyond will need to use high-resolution ground-based CO spectra..." is a universal claim about the entire JWST disk program, but the support provided is a single-object demonstration on FZ Tau (Fig. 6). No systematic enumeration of Cycle 1 and later JWST program goals is given, and many such programs do not target CO rovibrational kinematics (e.g., ice absorption, continuum, water inventories, or outer-disk chemistry). The claim should either be narrowed to programs whose science requires resolved CO kinematics, or supported by a survey of program goals; as written, it overstates the evidence in the manuscript.
  2. [§6, Fig. 6] The rotation-diagram fits report best-fit slab-model parameters (BC: T = 1420 K, N = 1e18 cm-2; NC: T = 1180 K, N = 3e17 cm-2; MIRI: T = 2460 K, N = 7e15 cm-2) with no uncertainties and no goodness-of-fit or degeneracy analysis. The figure shows no error bars on the line fluxes, and the text does not discuss relative flux calibration between iSHELL and MIRI-MRS, even though the demonstration combines fluxes from those two instruments in one population diagram. Without a treatment of random and systematic errors, the quantitative comparison of component temperatures and column densities—and the claimed advantage of combining the instruments—is not established. If this section is meant only as an illustration, it should be labeled as such and the quoted values as preliminary.
minor comments (7)
  1. [§1] "Gaia (??)" is an unresolved citation placeholder; add the appropriate Gaia reference.
  2. [§2.2] "simply ready a locally available file" should read "simply read a locally available file".
  3. [§4] "varying intention levels" should be "varying indentation levels", and "A fronted visualization system" should be "A frontend visualization system".
  4. [§5.2 and Fig. 1] "Standardization" is misspelled as "standarization" in the text and figure; fix throughout.
  5. [§5.4] "A WS" appears with a spurious space in multiple places; use "AWS" consistently.
  6. [Table 1] The "Also Recommend" column entries "Your favorite software" and "Docker only" are not concrete recommendations; replace them with specific named alternatives or delete the column.
  7. [§4.3] The text refers to "FITs format" and "FITs files"; the standard acronym is "FITS" (Flexible Image Transport System).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the science demonstration is an honest fit to external spectra, and the portal's utility is independently checkable.

full rationale

This paper is primarily an infrastructure and database-design paper. Its central claims are that the SpExoDisks portal provides curated, searchable spectra and that combining ground- and space-based data can inform protoplanetary disk science. Those claims are supported by the live portal, public code repositories, and externally published spectra; they are not derived from the paper's own outputs. The science application in §6 is explicitly an illustrative example, not a prediction: line fluxes from published iSHELL and MIRI-MRS observations of FZ Tau are fit with a plane-parallel slab model with temperature and column density as free parameters, and the best-fit values are reported as fits. The MIRI degeneracy discussion follows from the stated lower resolution and limited spectral coverage of MIRI-MRS, not from a fitted parameter being renamed as a prediction. No equation in the paper is defined in terms of a target result, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from self-citations to force a conclusion. The demonstration does rely on a slab model published by Jellison et al. (2024), which includes one of the present authors, and on iSHELL data from Banzatti et al. (2022, 2023a); however, these are openly cited external works with stated assumptions, and the fits are performed on independently obtained spectra rather than on data generated by the paper's own model. The strongest forward-looking statement, that 'all JWST disk programs in Cycle 1 and beyond will need' high-resolution ground-based CO spectra, is a broad generalization supported by a single-object demonstration; that is a scope or overgeneralization concern, not a circularity. Because the derivation chain does not reduce to its inputs by construction, the appropriate circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The scientific illustration in §6 carries six fitted parameters (T and N for BC, NC, and MIRI components) and relies on a slab model from the literature, on cross-instrument flux consistency, and on the accuracy of SIMBAD/Gaia/TIC contextual data. No new physical entities are introduced. The roadmap sections assume that best practices from SpExoDisks and Hypatia generalize to other teams.

free parameters (6)
  • T_BC = 1420 K
    Best-fit temperature for the broad component of CO emission in FZ Tau from a slab model fit to iSHELL line fluxes (Fig. 6, left).
  • N_BC = 1e18 cm^-2
    Best-fit column density for the broad component (Fig. 6, left).
  • T_NC = 1180 K
    Best-fit temperature for the narrow component (Fig. 6, left).
  • N_NC = 3e17 cm^-2
    Best-fit column density for the narrow component (Fig. 6, left).
  • T_MIRI = 2460 K
    Best-fit temperature from the MIRI-MRS blended data (Fig. 6, right).
  • N_MIRI = 7e15 cm^-2
    Best-fit column density from the MIRI-MRS blended data (Fig. 6, right).
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The plane-parallel slab model with a single temperature and column density adequately represents the CO ro-vibrational emission from each kinematic component.
    Relied on in §6 and Fig. 6 to interpret the population diagrams; the model comes from Jellison et al. 2024 and is not re-derived here.
  • domain assumption Contextual data from SIMBAD, Gaia, and TIC are accurate and current enough for automated data association.
    Used throughout §2.2 for star name resolution and stellar parameter retrieval; the pipeline raises exceptions when data are missing, but the accuracy of the external services is assumed.
  • domain assumption The relative flux calibration between iSHELL and MIRI-MRS is consistent enough to combine line fluxes in one population diagram.
    Implied by the joint excitation analysis in §6; no cross-instrument flux check is presented.
  • ad hoc to paper The recommendations for database development (3NF, single-unit enforcement, ranked reference lists) generalize beyond SpExoDisks.
    Presented as a roadmap in §2 through §5; based on the authors' experience, not on controlled comparison.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Database Design for SpExoDisks: A Database & Web Portal for Spectra of Exoplanet-Forming Disks." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HV4O66LW

@misc{pith2026241113308,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Database Design for SpExoDisks: A Database & Web Portal for Spectra of Exoplanet-Forming Disks},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HV4O66LW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.13308}
}
read the original abstract

Data access -- or the availability of new and archival data for use by the larger community -- is key for scientific advancement. How data is presented, searched, and formatted determines accessibility and it can be difficult to find a solution that fits the needs of a given subdiscipline. We present a generalized roadmap for developing a specialty astronomy database with web application based on the development of the SpExoDisks (Spectra of Exoplanet forming Disks) database (spexodisks.com), which provides infrared spectra of protoplanetary disks. Expertise in an astronomy subdiscipline can provide two necessary components for creating a database: access to a large volume of specialized data and knowledge of how that data should be presented to the community. However, there are a variety of steps and decisions for database development that can fall outside astronomy expertise. Here we offer generalized discussions on design and process that are accompanied by real-world examples from the SpExoDisks developer team and website. Starting from the database portal design and data organization, we demonstrate on-demand data distribution and query using publicly accessible database software. These systems support interactive visualizations such that users can explore spectra directly from their browsers. We also offer details that show how the technical concepts in SpExoDisks are implemented, particularly emphasizing sustainability and long-term management of the codebase and processes. Finally, we illustrate the utility that a specialty website can offer to the community by providing a specific example of how the combined spectra from SpExoDisks can enhance our understanding of protoplanetary disks.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.13308 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A schematic of the data organization and validation process for the SpExoDisks database portal. Before being imported, stellar and spectral data are stored in tables (shown with white text on a red background), where the data’s column name and type are listed. Before read-in, tables have no enforced rules or known relationships between them. Data validation (top right, numbered steps) makes associations between data… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The SpExoDisks database portal as viewed from spexodisks.com/ExploreData. Four regions have been denoted with dashed and dotted highlights. The spectrum plot (shown in a dotted rectangular box) is an interactive plotting tool displaying spectra and molecular lines. In the bottom half of the figure, a long-dashed box indicates the navigation table, which is used for searching available stars and displaying associated… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. An organizational chart of the SpExoDisks data science pipeline (see the key in the lower-left corner). The pipeline starts at the top-left and processes clockwise, ending at center-left side of the diagram. The large dotted boxes denote pipeline process clusters that are triggered for each observed spectrum, where data read-in starts from icons that contribute data in the accumulation and context phase of the pipel… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: An organizational chart of the SpExoDisks pub￾lic server configuration (see the key in the upper-left cor￾ner). Users (top-most icon) and developers (bottom-most icon) access the AWS virtual machine instance (icons en￾closed in a dashed box) through specific network po…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: A: Overview of spectra included in SpExoDisks, using examples and similar plotting tools to what is included on spexodisks.com. Different instruments and their resolving power are labeled. Synthetic models of the main molecular species are shown at the bottom for refer…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Left: Different excitation of the two kinematic components shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Comprehensive Analysis of Rovibrational CO in the Era of JWST

    astro-ph.SR 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A 183-object Keck survey detects CO rovibrational emission in 96 disks, fits slab models to 67, and concludes the CO emitting area is not a thin ring.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

28 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Argelander, F. W. A. 1903, Eds Marcus and Weber’s Verlag, 0

    work page 1903

  2. [2]

    R., et al

    Argyriou, I., Glasse, A., Law, D. R., et al. 2023, A&A, 675, A111, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346489 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Lim, P. L., et al. 2022, ApJ, 935, 167, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346489 2023

  3. [3]

    2016, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 129, 028001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/129/972/028001

    Baines, D., Giordano, F., Racero, E., et al. 2016, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 129, 028001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/129/972/028001

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/129/972/028001 2016

  4. [4]

    Banzatti, A., & Pontoppidan, K. M. 2015, ApJ, 809, 167, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/809/2/167

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/809/2/167 2015

  5. [5]

    M., Brittain, S., et al

    Banzatti, A., Abernathy, K. M., Brittain, S., et al. 2022, AJ, 163, 174, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ac52f0 22 Wheeler, Hinkel, & Banzatti

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac52f0 2022

  6. [6]

    M., P´ ere Ch´ avez, J., et al

    Banzatti, A., Pontoppidan, K. M., P´ ere Ch´ avez, J., et al. 2023a, AJ, 165, 72, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aca80b

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aca80b

  7. [7]

    M., Carr, J

    Banzatti, A., Pontoppidan, K. M., Carr, J. S., et al. 2023b, ApJL, 957, L22, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acf5ec

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acf5ec

  8. [8]

    E., Brown, J

    Bast, J. E., Brown, J. M., Herczeg, G. J., van Dishoeck, E. F., & Pontoppidan, K. M. 2011, A&A, 527, A119, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201015225

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201015225 2011

Show all 28 references
  1. [9]

    2018, Astronomy and Computing, 24, 97–103, doi: 10.1016/j.ascom.2018.05.002

    Giordano, F., Racero, E., Norman, H., et al. 2018, Astronomy and Computing, 24, 97–103, doi: 10.1016/j.ascom.2018.05.002

    2018 doi

  2. [10]

    F., & Langer, W

    Goldsmith, P. F., & Langer, W. D. 1999, ApJ, 517, 209, doi: 10.1086/307195

    1999 doi

  3. [11]

    E., Rothman, L

    Gordon, I. E., Rothman, L. S., Hargreaves, R. J., et al. 2022, JQSRT, 277, 107949, doi: 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2021.107949

    2022

  4. [12]

    L., van Dishoeck, E

    Grant, S. L., van Dishoeck, E. F., Tabone, B., et al. 2023, ApJL, 947, L6, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acc44b

    2023 doi

  5. [13]

    R., Timmes, F

    Hinkel, N. R., Timmes, F. X., Young, P. A., Pagano, M. D., & Turnbull, M. C. 2014, AJ, 148, 54, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/148/3/54

    2014 doi

  6. [14]

    R., Roellig, T

    Houck, J. R., Roellig, T. L., van Cleve, J., et al. 2004, ApJS, 154, 18, doi: 10.1086/423134

    2004 doi

  7. [15]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2402.04060, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2402.04060

    Jellison, E., Johnson, M., Banzatti, A., & Bruderer, S. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2402.04060, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2402.04060

    2024 doi arXiv

  8. [16]

    2004, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

    Kaeufl, H.-U., Ballester, P., Biereichel, P., et al. 2004, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 5492, Ground-based Instrumentation for Astronomy, ed. A. F. M. Moorwood & M. Iye, 1218–1227, doi: 10.1117/12.551480

    2004 doi

  9. [17]

    O., Pel, J

    Lagage, P. O., Pel, J. W., Authier, M., et al. 2004, The Messenger, 117, 12

    2004

  10. [18]

    T., et al

    Mace, G., Kim, H., Jaffe, D. T., et al. 2016, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 9908, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VI, ed. C. J. Evans, L. Simard, & H. Takami, 99080C, doi: 10.1117/12.2232780

    2016 doi

  11. [19]

    D., Wycoff, G

    Mason, B. D., Wycoff, G. L., Hartkopf, W. I., Douglass, G. G., & Worley, C. E. 2001, AJ, 122, 3466, doi: 10.1086/323920

    2001 doi

  12. [20]

    S., Becklin, E

    McLean, I. S., Becklin, E. E., Bendiksen, O., et al. 1998, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 3354, Infrared Astronomical Instrumentation, ed. A. M. Fowler, 566–578, doi: 10.1117/12.317283

    1998 doi

  13. [21]

    M., Salyk, C., Banzatti, A., et al

    Pontoppidan, K. M., Salyk, C., Banzatti, A., et al. 2024, ApJ, 963, 158, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad20f0 Ram ´ ırez-Tannus, M. C., Bik, A., Cuijpers, L., et al. 2023, ApJL, 958, L30, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad03f8

    2024 doi

  14. [22]

    2022, PASP, 134, 015002, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ac3cb4

    Rayner, J., Tokunaga, A., Jaffe, D., et al. 2022, PASP, 134, 015002, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ac3cb4

    2022 doi

  15. [23]

    H., Wright, G

    Rieke, G. H., Wright, G. S., B¨ oker, T., et al. 2015, PASP, 127, 584, doi: 10.1086/682252

    2015 doi

  16. [24]

    G., Oelkers, R

    Stassun, K. G., Oelkers, R. J., Paegert, M., et al. 2019, The Astronomical Journal, 158, 138, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab3467

    2019 doi

  17. [25]

    F., Grant, S

    Temmink, M., van Dishoeck, E. F., Grant, S. L., et al. 2024, A&A, 686, A117, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348911

    2024 doi

  18. [26]

    W., Glasse, A., et al

    Wells, M., Pel, J. W., Glasse, A., et al. 2015, PASP, 127, 646, doi: 10.1086/682281

    2015 doi

  19. [27]

    2000, A&AS, 143, 9, doi: 10.1051/aas:2000332

    Wenger, M., Ochsenbein, F., Egret, D., et al. 2000, A&AS, 143, 9, doi: 10.1051/aas:2000332

    2000 doi

  20. [28]

    bd” prefix, which sends the remaining part of the string to a parser specific to the “BD

    Wright, G. S., Rieke, G. H., Glasse, A., et al. 2023, PASP, 135, 048003, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/acbe66 Dynamic Small Database Design for SpExoDisks 23 APPENDIX A. THE STAR NAME PROBLEM Uniting an individual observation to all other data regarding the same star is essential for...

    2023 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.