Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

ToolScan: A Benchmark for Characterizing Errors in Tool-Use LLMs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.13547 v2 pith:MEBLKTBR submitted 2024-11-20 cs.SE cs.AI

ToolScan: A Benchmark for Characterizing Errors in Tool-Use LLMs

classification cs.SE cs.AI
keywords llmsbenchmarkerrortoolscanpatternsenvironmentserrorsevaluating
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) is one of the most critical aspects of building a performant compound AI system. Since the output from LLMs propagate to downstream steps, identifying LLM errors is crucial to system performance. A common task for LLMs in AI systems is tool use. While there are several benchmark environments for evaluating LLMs on this task, they typically only give a success rate without any explanation of the failure cases. To solve this problem, we introduce TOOLSCAN, a new benchmark to identify error patterns in LLM output on tool-use tasks. Our benchmark data set comprises of queries from diverse environments that can be used to test for the presence of seven newly characterized error patterns. Using TOOLSCAN, we show that even the most prominent LLMs exhibit these error patterns in their outputs. Researchers can use these insights from TOOLSCAN to guide their error mitigation strategies.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. AgentFloor: How Far Up the tool use Ladder Can Small Open-Weight Models Go?

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Small open-weight models match GPT-5 on routine agent tool-use tasks but lag on long-horizon planning, supporting tiered routing to reduce costs in agentic systems.

  2. Bounded Autonomy for Enterprise AI: Typed Action Contracts and Consumer-Side Execution

    cs.SE 2026-04 conditional novelty 5.0

    Bounded autonomy using typed action contracts and consumer-side execution lets LLMs safely operate enterprise systems, achieving 23 of 25 tasks with zero unsafe executions versus 17 for unconstrained AI across 25 trials.

  3. Beyond the Leaderboard: A Synthesis of Tool-Use, Planning, and Reasoning Failures in Large Language Model Agents

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0

    A narrative synthesis of 27 agent evaluation papers identifies six recurring failure clusters and finds that agent failures compound non-linearly with task length, sub-skills do not compose into end-to-end success, an...