Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

VideoEspresso: A Large-Scale Chain-of-Thought Dataset for Fine-Grained Video Reasoning via Core Frame Selection

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.14794 v1 pith:VRRJWUVO submitted 2024-11-22 cs.CV cs.AIcs.CL

classification cs.CVcs.AIcs.CL
keywords reasoningvideopairsannotationsdatasetlvlmsmultimodaltasks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The advancement of Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs) has significantly improved multimodal understanding, yet challenges remain in video reasoning tasks due to the scarcity of high-quality, large-scale datasets. Existing video question-answering (VideoQA) datasets often rely on costly manual annotations with insufficient granularity or automatic construction methods with redundant frame-by-frame analysis, limiting their scalability and effectiveness for complex reasoning. To address these challenges, we introduce VideoEspresso, a novel dataset that features VideoQA pairs preserving essential spatial details and temporal coherence, along with multimodal annotations of intermediate reasoning steps. Our construction pipeline employs a semantic-aware method to reduce redundancy, followed by generating QA pairs using GPT-4o. We further develop video Chain-of-Thought (CoT) annotations to enrich reasoning processes, guiding GPT-4o in extracting logical relationships from QA pairs and video content. To exploit the potential of high-quality VideoQA pairs, we propose a Hybrid LVLMs Collaboration framework, featuring a Frame Selector and a two-stage instruction fine-tuned reasoning LVLM. This framework adaptively selects core frames and performs CoT reasoning using multimodal evidence. Evaluated on our proposed benchmark with 14 tasks against 9 popular LVLMs, our method outperforms existing baselines on most tasks, demonstrating superior video reasoning capabilities. Our code and dataset will be released at: https://github.com/hshjerry/VideoEspresso

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MarineEVT: Advancing Event-Centric Marine Video Understanding via Visual Tool Reasoning

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    On MarineEVT, an event-centric 20K-pair marine video QA benchmark, EVT-R1 with tool-integrated RL scores 48.89 average accuracy, 5.22 points above the best untuned open-source VLM and 8.54 above the best tool-using co...

  2. HumanPCR: Probing MLLM Capabilities in Diverse Human-Centric Scenes

    cs.CV 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A hierarchical benchmark for multimodal models on human-centric visual understanding finds frontier models average under 60% and miss question-uncued visual evidence, with test-time scaling helping only marginally.

  3. Temporal Chain of Thought: Long-Video Understanding by Thinking in Frames

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    TCoT uses a single VLM to select question-relevant video frames from segments, then answers from that curated context, improving video QA accuracy across four benchmarks and three VLMs.

  4. DAVID-XR1: Detecting AI-Generated Videos with Explainable Reasoning

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A video-language model fine-tuned on a new defect-annotated dataset detects AI-generated videos from unseen generators with 76.7% accuracy and gives written explanations, though the test set is small and the dataset i...

  5. VRBench: A Benchmark for Multi-Step Reasoning in Long Narrative Videos

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    VRBench is a benchmark of 960 long narrative videos with 8,243 human-written multi-step questions, plus a two-level evaluation of answer accuracy and reasoning quality for 31 large models.

Pith tools