Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Gradient-Free Classifier Guidance for Diffusion Model Sampling

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.15393 v1 pith:7CHFD5PI submitted 2024-11-23 cs.CV cs.AI

Gradient-Free Classifier Guidance for Diffusion Model Sampling

classification cs.CV cs.AI
keywords classifierguidancesamplingclassdiffusionfidelitygradient-freeguided
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

Image generation using diffusion models have demonstrated outstanding learning capabilities, effectively capturing the full distribution of the training dataset. They are known to generate wide variations in sampled images, albeit with a trade-off in image fidelity. Guided sampling methods, such as classifier guidance (CG) and classifier-free guidance (CFG), focus sampling in well-learned high-probability regions to generate images of high fidelity, but each has its limitations. CG is computationally expensive due to the use of back-propagation for classifier gradient descent, while CFG, being gradient-free, is more efficient but compromises class label alignment compared to CG. In this work, we propose an efficient guidance method that fully utilizes a pre-trained classifier without using gradient descent. By using the classifier solely in inference mode, a time-adaptive reference class label and corresponding guidance scale are determined at each time step for guided sampling. Experiments on both class-conditioned and text-to-image generation diffusion models demonstrate that the proposed Gradient-free Classifier Guidance (GFCG) method consistently improves class prediction accuracy. We also show GFCG to be complementary to other guided sampling methods like CFG. When combined with the state-of-the-art Autoguidance (ATG), without additional computational overhead, it enhances image fidelity while preserving diversity. For ImageNet 512$\times$512, we achieve a record $\text{FD}_{\text{DINOv2}}$ of 23.09, while simultaneously attaining a higher classification Precision (94.3%) compared to ATG (90.2%)

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Conditional Diffusion Guidance under Hard Constraint: A Stochastic Analysis Approach

    cs.AI 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0

    By adding drift g(t)^2 ∇log h(t,y) with h estimated via martingale and covariation losses, diffusion samples can be hard-conditioned on an event.

  2. DiffIER: Optimizing Diffusion Models with Iterative Error Reduction

    cs.CV 2025-08 reject novelty 4.0

    DiffIER claims that iteratively minimizing the distance between a diffusion model's predicted noise and a random Gaussian sample at each inference step improves generation quality.