Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

One-stop strategy to search for long-duration gravitational-wave signals

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A single GPU engine can now search for continuous gravitational waves generically, matching specialized pipelines while estimating sensitivity without large injection campaigns.

desk verdict A credible, useful methods paper: generic GPU engine plus a semianalytic sensitivity estimator demonstrated on one band; the main gap is the unvalidated transfer of that estimator to other bands. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.18370 v2 pith:6YRBVG74 submitted 2024-11-27 gr-qc astro-ph.IMphysics.data-an

Rodrigo Tenorio , Joan-René Mérou , Alicia M. Sintes This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qcastro-ph.IMphysics.data-an
keywords continuousgravitationalwavesGPUcomputingsemicoherentsearchsensitivityestimationrandomtemplatebanksbinaryneutronstarsshort-coherencedetectionstatisticsnumbercountveto
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that a brute-force, GPU-parallelized evaluation of short-coherence detection statistics can match the computational efficiency of purpose-built continuous-wave search pipelines without any model-specific optimization, and that the sensitivity of such a generic search can be estimated semianalytically by sampling from a four-parameter Gaussian distribution rather than running injection campaigns. The engine evaluates any statistic that is a weighted sum of normalized-power values along a time–frequency track, so it applies to isolated neutron stars, binary systems, and other long-duration signals alike. The sensitivity estimator replaces the costly step of simulating and re-analyzing thousands of signals with Monte Carlo draws that are statistically equivalent to those injections, including the effect of random template banks and ahead-of-time post-processing boxes. The scheme is demonstrated in an all-sky search for unknown binary neutron stars in real data from the third observing run, where a minimal number-count veto brings the measured detection probability into agreement with the semianalytic estimate.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the short-coherence detection statistic s(λ) = Σ w_{Xα} s[t_{Xα}; f(t_{Xα}; λ)], evaluated with bulk vectorized array operations; its Gaussian approximation in the many-SFT limit reduces the signal distribution to four moments q = {μG, σG, ρ̂1², ρ̂2²}, with μG carrying a 1.012 PSD-estimation bias factor. Around this, the paper builds a uniform-density coordinate system ξ(λ) from the local template density ϱ(λ), which turns a non-uniformly populated parameter space into a hyperbox where random template banks with oversampling o are trivial to draw and where mismatch distributions p(m|o) are precomputed once in Gaussian noise. Post-processing is replaced by an ahead-of-time partition of ξ-space into fixed-size hyperboxes; the detection rule is then a per-box threshold τ(λ) on the standardized statistic z, which makes the detection probability a cheap Monte Carlo integral over q, m, and λ. A minimal weighted number count, computed from a binarized spectrogram with threshold 3.2, acts as the persistence veto that makes the Gaussian model applicable to real data.

What would settle it

Run the identical search configuration with 500 injections in one of the other seven frequency bands, such as 187.0 Hz, and compare the measured detection probability against the semianalytic curve; a deviation in the 95% sensitivity depth larger than the fit's quoted uncertainty would falsify the claim that the Gaussian model transfers once the number-count veto is applied.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is twofold. First, for a short-coherence detection statistic that combines SFT power along a template track, batch evaluation on a GPU makes a brute-force template loop two to three orders of magnitude faster than a saturated multi-core CPU implementation and comparable to existing GPU-accelerated pipelines that exploit parameter-space structure; the per-template cost is captured by an empirical model in Eq. (26). Second, the detection-statistic distribution under the signal hypothesis is determined, in the large-NSFT Gaussian limit, by only four quantities q = {μG, σG, ρ̂1², ρ̂2²} built from detector weights and per-SFT signal power, so drawing a detection statistic for a signal of depth D reduces to sampling a mismatch m from the template-bank oversampling distribution p(m|o), a sky and orientation population, and a Gaussian with those moments. The paper states this equivalence directly: sampling p(z|D, o, λ) is statistically equivalent to injecting a CW signal in Gaussian noise at depth D and retrieving the maximum detection statistic z from a random template bank with oversampling o. In real data from the third observing run, imposing a minimal weighted number count suppresses non-Gaussian artifacts well enough that the measured detection probabilities agree with the semianalytic estimate, and the resulting 95% sensitivity depths are consistent with those of a prior all-sky binary search.

Load-bearing premise

The semianalytic sensitivity estimator assumes that the Gaussian-noise distributional model, including the 1.012 PSD-bias factor and the precomputed mismatch distribution p(m|o), remains valid in real detector data once a minimal number-count veto is imposed; this transfer is checked against injections only in the 110.5 Hz band, not in the other seven bands.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any short-coherence search, regardless of the source model, can be deployed by supplying only a frequency-evolution model f(t; λ); no pipeline-specific optimization is needed to reach competitive GPU efficiency.
  • Sensitivity estimation for a blind search becomes a laptop-scale calculation, so optimal candidate-selection and box-rejection strategies can be solved in minutes instead of by dedicated injection campaigns.
  • Requiring a minimal weighted number count removes most non-Gaussian artifact contamination, restoring agreement between measured and modeled detection probability.
  • The per-template cost model in Eq. (26) lets future searches choose template-batch sizes and SFT counts to saturate a given GPU, and predicts that further gains come from reducing the number of semicoherent segments.
  • The same machinery transfers to long-duration signals from next-generation ground-based and space-borne detectors, where compact-binary coalescence signals linger in band and resemble continuous waves.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The equivalence between sampling p(z|D, o, λ) and injection campaigns suggests that, in regimes where the Gaussian-noise model is trusted, injection campaigns could be reduced to validation sets rather than used as the primary sensitivity estimator, a step the authors validate only in one band.
  • The ξ-coordinate random template bank sidesteps metric-based lattice placement; if template counting rather than metric coverage is the binding constraint, the oversampling o needed for a given mismatch may itself become the search's main tuning knob, something the paper does not directly quantify in terms of missed volume.
  • Because the whole pipeline is expressed as array operations, the same engine could be paired with automatic differentiation of the frequency model to build template banks or to optimize follow-up, an extension the paper does not pursue.
  • The other seven frequency bands' agreement with the semianalytic estimate is implied by the Gaussian transfer but not independently demonstrated, so the method's portability across bands is an extrapolation to check.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper presents a 'one-stop' strategy for blind searches of long-duration gravitational-wave signals. It introduces fasttracks, a GPU-accelerated brute-force engine for short-coherence detection statistics; a random template bank built from uniform-density coordinates; an ahead-of-time box partition that replaces clustering-based post-processing; and a semianalytic sensitivity-estimation method that generalizes earlier work by Wette and Dreissigacker et al. to weighted short-coherence statistics and box-based selection rules. The authors demonstrate the approach on an all-sky search for binary neutron-star continuous-wave signals in eight frequency bands from the first half of O3, validate the sensitivity estimator against injections at 110.5 Hz, and compare the resulting depth estimates with a previous search.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the paper offers a substantial practical advance: a generic, signal-model-agnostic search pipeline whose sensitivity can be estimated without large injection campaigns, complementing the existing literature on model-specific GPU implementations and analytic sensitivity estimation. The open-source releases of fasttracks and cows3, the explicit Monte Carlo formulation of pdet in Eq. (48), and the real-data injection tests are concrete strengths. The estimator is not circular: p(q|λ) and p(m|o) are constructed from independent simulated priors and then compared with an injection campaign. However, the validation is currently too narrow to support the full 'generic one-stop' claim, and the GPU efficiency comparison lacks a same-hardware baseline against existing pipelines.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. V, Sec. VIB, Figs. 4 and 6] The semianalytic sensitivity estimator is validated against injection-measured detection probabilities only for the 110.5 Hz band (Fig. 4). For the seven other bands, Fig. 6 compares only injection-measured D95 values with a previous search [130]; no semianalytic pdet curves or D95 predictions are shown for those bands. Since Sec. VIB states that real-data non-Gaussianities make the Sec. V results inapplicable unless the number-count veto restores Gaussian behavior, the transfer of p(m|o) and the Gaussian-noise p(z|D,o,λ) model to the other bands is exactly the unverified link. Moreover, Eq. (47) models the detection rule as a step threshold on z and does not include the weighted number-count condition used in the actual search, so the agreement at 110.5 Hz may reflect properties of that particular band rather than a general equivalence between the sampler and an injection campaign. To support the paper's central claim, the semianalytic D95 should be compared with the injection-measured values for all eight bands, or at least for a random subset not used to tune the veto.
  2. [Sec. III, Fig. 2, Eq. (26)] The claim that GPU-accelerated brute-force template evaluation provides 'comparable computing efficiencies to using model-specific optimizations' is not directly established by the measurements shown. Fig. 2 benchmarks fasttracks on an H100 against a CPU only; the comparison with [53,94] is qualitative and uses different hardware, workloads, and SFT configurations. The fitted cost model in Eq. (26) is stated without a derivation or a test against the data points, and the figure has no error bars despite being averaged over 10 realizations. I recommend either adding a same-hardware benchmark of at least one existing pipeline with the same SFT data and template bank, or explicitly restricting the claim to the CPU-versus-GPU speedup of fasttracks.
  3. [Sec. IIB, Eq. (46)] The treatment of the PSD-estimation bias is internally inconsistent. Sec. IIB states that estimating Sn with a running median introduces a 'small upward bias in µG and σG', but Eq. (46) applies the 1.012 factor only to µG, not to σG. If the bias is common to both moments, the standardized statistic z in Eq. (36) and hence the threshold rule in Eq. (47) are miscalibrated; if the bias affects only the mean, the text should say so and the numerical value should be justified. The current statement 'about 1.2% for µG' is not derived or evidenced in the paper, despite being a multiplicative calibration of the central sensitivity estimate.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Secs. III, VI, Appendix A] There are several typos: 'NVDIA' should be 'NVIDIA' in Sec. III, 'Tukey widow' should be 'Tukey window' in Sec. VI, 'unaplicable' should be 'inapplicable' in Sec. VIB, and 'resoltuion' should be 'resolution' in Appendix A.
  2. [Figs. 4 and 5] The injection-based pdet points are shown without binomial error bars, although each point is based on 500 injections; adding confidence intervals would make the agreement with the semianalytic curves more interpretable.
  3. [Sec. IVA, Fig. 3] The statement that p(m|o) is 'compatible with Weibull distributions' is not supported by any quantitative fit; the authors should either provide fit parameters and a goodness-of-fit measure or soften the statement to a qualitative observation.
  4. [Eq. (26)] The cost-model formula in Eq. (26) is ambiguous because the denominator is not clearly parenthesized; the intended expression for log10 cλ should be written out unambiguously.
  5. [Sec. VIC, Fig. 6] The statement that the obtained sensitivity depths are 'broadly consistent' with [130] is not quantified, and the blue crosses are described as being shown only for completeness; either remove the consistency claim or support it with a numerical comparison.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the semianalytic sensitivity estimator is an independent Monte Carlo integration validated out-of-sample against real O3 injections; self-citations are supportive rather than load-bearing, and the main weakness (single-band validation) is a validation-scope concern, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The central derivation chain — that Monte Carlo sampling of p(z|D,o,lambda) (Eq. 48) is statistically equivalent to an injection campaign — is self-contained rather than circular. The per-SFT distributions (Eqs. 11, 20) and their Gaussian limits (Eqs. 12, 21-23) are derived in-paper from standard statistics; the mismatch distribution p(m|o) is obtained by explicit simulation in Gaussian noise (Sec. IVA, Fig. 3); the response quantities q in Eq. (46) are computed from antenna-pattern functions and population priors, with the 1.012 PSD-bias factor attributed to an external technical document [72] and 'corroborated by our numerical experiments', not fitted to the injection campaign. The agreement at 110.5 Hz (Fig. 4) is therefore an out-of-sample check against an external benchmark (real O3 data plus injected signals), and the measured pdet values in Fig. 6 come from injections, not from the estimator, which is used only to choose the box-rejection operating point. The self-citations present — [134] for weighted number-count statistics (elementary statistics corroborated by the authors' numerical results), [57] for the box-rejection rationale, [53] as one GPU-efficiency comparison point alongside external [94], and the authors' own packages [54, 58] — are supporting rather than load-bearing, since the core estimator and the GPU benchmark are validated independently of them. Two limitations are noted but are not circularity: (i) the estimator-versus-injection agreement is demonstrated for only one of eight bands (Fig. 4 vs Fig. 6), and (ii) Sec. VIB explicitly concedes that 'the results derived in Sec. V [are] unaplicable [sic]' to real data unless the number-count veto restores Gaussian behavior — the transfer of the Gaussian model to the other seven bands is assumed, not shown. These are validation-scope concerns; no equation is defined in terms of the quantity it predicts, and no predicted value is fitted to the validation target, so the score is low despite these gaps.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central derivation uses standard Gaussian and chi-squared statistics plus a small set of modeling choices: an empirical PSD bias correction, a numerically calibrated number-count threshold, a monomial template-density assumption, and a Gaussian-to-real-data transfer assumption. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • PSD estimation bias factor = 1.012
    Multiplicative correction to mu_G in Eq. (46), inherited from Ref. [72] and corroborated numerically; it shifts all Gaussian noise statistics and therefore the sensitivity thresholds.
  • Number-count veto threshold = 3 standard deviations above Gaussian mean
    Chosen from numerical results in Sec. VIB to separate persistent signals from non-Gaussianities; the sensitivity estimates in Fig. 4 use this threshold.
  • Template bank oversampling o = 3.44
    Chosen in Sec. VIA to balance template count against computing cost; the sensitivity estimator explicitly depends on o through p(m|o).
  • GPU cost model coefficients = -5/3, 1, 10^6, 5/6 in Eq. (26)
    Empirical fit to benchmark timings in Fig. 2; used to argue computational efficiency but not central to the physics.
  • Minimum number of boxes per frequency band = 10,000
    Operational choice in Sec. IVB to allow rejection of contaminated regions; part of the post-processing setup but not a deduced optimum.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption SFT noise is stationary, Gaussian, and independent across time and frequency, with PSD estimated from data.
    Underlies the chi-squared and Gaussian distributions in Sec. II.B; real data deviate, which the paper mitigates with a number-count veto.
  • standard math Lyapunov central limit theorem applies to the weighted sum of per-SFT statistics when NSFT >> 1.
    Used in Eqs. (12) and (21) to approximate s(lambda) as Gaussian; validity requires many SFTs and bounded weights.
  • domain assumption Intrinsic frequency evolution, spindown, is negligible for short-coherence binary-source searches.
    Signal model Eq. (2) omits spindown; stated as reasonable for the target searches in Sec. II.A.
  • domain assumption Template density rho(lambda) is a monomial in lambda, allowing the xi-coordinate transformation of Sec. IVA.
    Eq. (31) and Appendix A derive xi for the circular-binary model; other signal models would need a different transform.
  • ad hoc to paper The mismatch distribution p(m|o) estimated from Gaussian-noise injections is representative of real-data behavior after the number-count veto.
    The semianalytic sensitivity estimator draws m from this distribution; direct validation is provided only for the 110.5 Hz band in Fig. 4.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of One-stop strategy to search for long-duration gravitational-wave signals." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6YRBVG74

@misc{pith2026241118370,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: One-stop strategy to search for long-duration gravitational-wave signals},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6YRBVG74}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.18370}
}
read the original abstract

Blind continuous gravitational-wave (CWs) searches are a significant computational challenge due to their long duration and weak amplitude of the involved signals. To cope with such problem, the community has developed a variety of data-analysis strategies which are usually tailored to specific CW searches; this prevents their applicability across the nowadays broad landscape of potential CW source. Also, their sensitivity is typically hard to model, and thus usually requires a significant computing investment. We present fasttracks, a massively-parallel engine to evaluate detection statistics for generic CW signals using GPU computing. We demonstrate a significant increase in computational efficiency by parallelizing the brute-force evaluation of detection statistics without using any computational approximations. Also, we introduce a simple and scalable postprocessing which allows us to formulate a generic semianalytic sensitivity estimate algorithm. These proposals are tested in a minimal all-sky search in data from the third observing run of the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Collaboration. The strategies discussed here will become increasingly relevant in the coming years as long-duration signals become a standard observation of future ground-based and space-borne detectors.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.18370 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Normalized spectrogram of 1 month of narrow-band [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Cost of evaluating [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Mismatch distributions for the search setup [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Detection probabilities at different sensitivity depths [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Comparison of detection probabilities for different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. GPU-Accelerated Searches for Long-Transient Gravitational Waves from Newborn Neutron Stars

    gr-qc 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A JAX/GPU implementation of a long-transient gravitational-wave search is about 60 times faster per template than ATrHough and suggests that 10^8 to 10^9 templates suffice for near-optimal sensitivity.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

148 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [130]

    Messenger, R

    C. Messenger, R. Prix, and M. A. Papa, Random templatebanksandrelaxedlatticecoverings,Phys.Rev. D 79, 104017 (2009), arXiv:0809.5223 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2009

  2. [1]

    Normalized power is then given by HG : s[t; f ] = 4 TSFTSn |˜n[t; f ]|2

    Distribution under the noise hypothesis Under the noise hypothesis, data is assumed to consist of Gaussian noise HG : ˜x = ˜n , (8) where the realR and imaginary I parts follow the same distribution given by R˜n[t; f ], I˜n[t; f ] ∼ Gauss 0, 1 2 p TSFTSn , (9) and the standard deviation follows from the Wiener- Kintchine theorem. Normalized power is then ...

  3. [2]

    loudest candidates

    Distribution under the signal hypothesis Under the signal hypothesis data consist of Gaussian noise and a CW signalh with parameters λ, A: HS : ˜x = ˜n + ˜h . (16) As previously discussed, within an SFT Xα a CW signal can be described as a monochromatic signal with frequency f (tXα ; λ) and amplitude given by [34] ˜hXα ≈ 0.7737 × TSFT 2 h0 F+(tXα ; ˆn, ψ)...

  4. [3]

    closeness

    A notion of “closeness” Short-coherence detection statistics [Eq. (3)] depend on λ mainly through the frequency-evolution model f (t; λ), from which a parameter-space distance can be defined [112]. For a given spectrogram time-resolution TSFT, frequency is naturally discretised in steps ofT −1 SFT. We can thus define the parameter-space resolution of a gi...

  5. [4]

    (34): ξmin = ξ(λmin) ξmax = ξ(λmax)

    Map the boundaries in∆λ to the boundaries inξ using Eq. (34): ξmin = ξ(λmin) ξmax = ξ(λmax)

  6. [5]

    Generate a template bank in ξ according to any prescription

  7. [6]

    Map the template bank in ξ back to λ using Eq. (34)

  8. [7]

    Here, on the other hand, we explore the use ofrandom template banks [118, 121]

    Random template bank ξ coordinates allow for standard lattice template-bank construction methods [78, 116]. Here, on the other hand, we explore the use ofrandom template banks [118, 121]. These are easy to implement in our setup and play nicely with the batch-evaluation of templates: Instead of walking a grid, simply draw n templates uniformly in ξ, map t...

Show all 148 references
  1. [8]

    Generate a Gaussian-noise data stream containing a CW signal according to the search’s priors

  2. [9]

    Uniformly sample oN (∆λ) templates in ξ space and map them toλ space

  3. [10]

    response function

    Evaluate vmap s on the generated templates and compute m according to Eq. (24). We show the mismatch distribution corresponding to the search setup described in Sec. VI for different oversampling values in Fig. 3. Concretely, templates are uniformly distributed in a narrow fre...

  4. [11]

    (A1) This is a conservative choice [34, 71, 136]

    Parameter-space resolution We start by taking frequency resolution as δf0 = T −1 SFT . (A1) This is a conservative choice [34, 71, 136]. Frequency is inferred by essentially counting cycles; in that sense higher frequencies may be easier to determine, but the difference is sma...

  5. [12]

    Searches for this kind of signals are conducted all-sky, in narrow frequency bands, covering a region of the(ap, Ω) plane and the full range ϕb ∈ [0, 2π)

    Coordinate transformation The resulting local density of templates in the parameter space is ϱ(λ) = kf 5 0 a2 pΩ3 , (A9) with k = T 6 SFTTobs(v/c)2. Searches for this kind of signals are conducted all-sky, in narrow frequency bands, covering a region of the(ap, Ω) plane and th...

  6. [13]

    Riles, Searches for continuous-wave gravitational radiation, Living Rev

    K. Riles, Searches for continuous-wave gravitational radiation, Living Rev. Rel. 26, 3 (2023), arXiv:2206.06447 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Aasiet al.(LIGO Scientific), Advanced LIGO, Class

    J. Aasiet al.(LIGO Scientific), Advanced LIGO, Class. Quant. Grav. 32, 074001 (2015), arXiv:1411.4547 [gr- qc]

    2015 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Acerneseet al.(VIRGO), Advanced Virgo: a second- generation interferometric gravitational wave detector, Class

    F. Acerneseet al.(VIRGO), Advanced Virgo: a second- generation interferometric gravitational wave detector, Class. Quant. Grav.32, 024001 (2015), arXiv:1408.3978 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Akutsu et al

    T. Akutsu et al. (KAGRA), KAGRA: 2.5 Generation Interferometric Gravitational Wave Detector, Nature Astron. 3, 35 (2019), arXiv:1811.08079 [gr-qc]

    2019

  10. [17]

    Sieniawska and M

    M. Sieniawska and M. Bejger, Continuous gravitational waves from neutron stars: current status and prospects, Universe 5, 217 (2019), arXiv:1909.12600 [astro-ph.HE]

    2019 arXiv

  11. [18]

    O. J. Piccinni, Status and Perspectives of Continuous Gravitational Wave Searches, Galaxies 10, 72 (2022), arXiv:2202.01088 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Haskell and M

    B. Haskell and M. Bejger, Astrophysics with continuous gravitational waves, Nature Astronomy7, 1160 (2023)

    2023

  13. [20]

    M. Isi, L. Sun, R. Brito, and A. Melatos, Directed searches for gravitational waves from ultralight bosons, Phys. Rev. D99, 084042 (2019), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 102, 049901 (2020)], arXiv:1810.03812 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  14. [21]

    L. Sun, R. Brito, and M. Isi, Search for ultralight bosons in Cygnus X-1 with Advanced LIGO, Phys. Rev. D 101, 063020 (2020), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 102, 089902 15 (2020)], arXiv:1909.11267 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Palomba et al

    C. Palomba et al. , Direct constraints on ultra- light boson mass from searches for continuous gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 171101 (2019), arXiv:1909.08854 [astro-ph.HE]

    2019 arXiv

  16. [23]

    S. J. Zhu, M. Baryakhtar, M. A. Papa, D. Tsuna, N. Kawanaka, and H.-B. Eggenstein, Characterizing the continuous gravitational-wave signal from boson clouds around Galactic isolated black holes, Phys. Rev. D102, 063020 (2020), arXiv:2003.03359 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Wette, Methods and prospects for gravitational- wave searches targeting ultralight vector-boson clouds around known black holes, Phys

    D.Jones, L.Sun, N.Siemonsen, W.E.East, S.M.Scott, and K. Wette, Methods and prospects for gravitational- wave searches targeting ultralight vector-boson clouds around known black holes, Phys. Rev. D108, 064001 (2023), arXiv:2305.00401 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  18. [25]

    A. L. Miller, F. Badaracco, and C. Palomba (LIGO Scientific, Virgo, KAGRA), Distinguishing between dark-matter interactions with gravitational- wave detectors, Phys. Rev. D 105, 103035 (2022), arXiv:2204.03814 [astro-ph.IM]

    2022 arXiv

  19. [26]

    A. L. Miller and L. Mendes, First search for ultralight dark matter with a space-based gravitational-wave antenna: LISA Pathfinder, Phys. Rev. D107, 063015 (2023), arXiv:2301.08736 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  20. [27]

    A. G. Abacet al.(KAGRA, LIGO Scientific, VIRGO), Ultralightvectordarkmattersearch usingdatafromthe KAGRA O3GK run, Phys. Rev. D110, 042001 (2024), arXiv:2403.03004 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Bhattacharya, A

    S. Bhattacharya, A. L. Miller, and A. Ray, Continuous gravitational waves: A new window to look for heavy nonannihilating dark matter, Phys. Rev. D110, 043006 (2024), arXiv:2403.13886 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Guo and A

    H.-K. Guo and A. Miller, Searching for Mini Extreme Mass Ratio Inspirals with Gravitational-Wave Detectors, arXiv e-prints (2022), arXiv:2205.10359 [astro-ph.IM]

    2022 arXiv

  23. [30]

    A. L. Miller, Prospects for detecting asteroid-mass primordial black holes in extreme-mass-ratio inspirals with continuous gravitational waves, arXiv e-prints (2024), arXiv:2410.01348 [gr-qc]

    2024

  24. [31]

    A. L. Miller, N. Aggarwal, S. Clesse, F. De Lillo, S. Sachdev, P. Astone, C. Palomba, O. J. Piccinni, and L. Pierini, Gravitational Wave Constraints on Planetary-Mass Primordial Black Holes Using LIGO O3a Data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 111401 (2024), arXiv:2402.19468 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  25. [32]

    Jaranowski, A

    P. Jaranowski, A. Krolak, and B. F. Schutz, Data analysis of gravitational - wave signals from spinning neutron stars. 1. The Signal and its detection, Phys. Rev. D 58, 063001 (1998), arXiv:gr-qc/9804014

    1998 arXiv

  26. [33]

    Cutler and B

    C. Cutler and B. F. Schutz, The Generalized F-statistic: Multiple detectors and multiple GW pulsars, Phys. Rev. D 72, 063006 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0504011

    2005 arXiv

  27. [34]

    P. R. Brady and T. Creighton, Searching for periodic sources with LIGO. 2. Hierarchical searches, Phys. Rev. D 61, 082001 (2000), arXiv:gr-qc/9812014

    2000 arXiv

  28. [35]

    Wette, Lattice template placement for coherent all- sky searches for gravitational-wave pulsars, Phys

    K. Wette, Lattice template placement for coherent all- sky searches for gravitational-wave pulsars, Phys. Rev. D 90, 122010 (2014), arXiv:1410.6882 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  29. [36]

    Maggiore et al., Science Case for the Einstein Telescope, JCAP 03, 050, arXiv:1912.02622 [astro- ph.CO]

    M. Maggiore et al., Science Case for the Einstein Telescope, JCAP 03, 050, arXiv:1912.02622 [astro- ph.CO]

    1912 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Reitze et al

    D. Reitze et al. , Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO, Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 51, 035 (2019), arXiv:1907.04833 [astro-ph.IM]

    2019 arXiv

  31. [38]

    Amaro-Seoane et al., Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1702.00786 (2017), arXiv:1702.00786 [astro-ph.IM]

    P. Amaro-Seoane et al., Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1702.00786 (2017), arXiv:1702.00786 [astro-ph.IM]

    2017 arXiv

  32. [39]

    Hu and Y.-L

    W.-R. Hu and Y.-L. Wu, The Taiji Program in Space for gravitational wave physics and the nature of gravity, Natl. Sci. Rev.4, 685 (2017)

    2017

  33. [40]

    Li et al., Gravitational Wave Astronomy With TianQin, arXiv e-prints (2024), arXiv:2409.19665 [astro-ph.GA]

    E.-K. Li et al., Gravitational Wave Astronomy With TianQin, arXiv e-prints (2024), arXiv:2409.19665 [astro-ph.GA]

    2024 arXiv

  34. [41]

    Abbott et al

    R. Abbott et al. (KAGRA, VIRGO, LIGO Scientific), GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the Second Part of the Third Observing Run, Phys. Rev. X13, 041039 (2023), arXiv:2111.03606 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  35. [42]

    A. H. Nitz, S. Kumar, Y.-F. Wang, S. Kastha, S. Wu, M. Schäfer, R. Dhurkunde, and C. D. Capano, 4-OGC: Catalog of Gravitational Waves from Compact Binary Mergers, Astrophys. J.946, 59 (2023), arXiv:2112.06878 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  36. [43]

    Wadekar, J

    D. Wadekar, J. Roulet, T. Venumadhav, A. K. Mehta, B. Zackay, J. Mushkin, S. Olsen, and M. Zaldarriaga, New black hole mergers in the LIGO-Virgo O3 data from a gravitational wave search including higher-order harmonics, arXiv e-print (2023), arXiv:2312.06631 [gr- qc]

    2023 arXiv

  37. [44]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), The basic physics of the binary black hole merger GW150914, Annalen Phys. 529, 1600209 (2017), arXiv:1608.01940 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  38. [45]

    Astone, K

    P. Astone, K. M. Borkowski, P. Jaranowski, and A. Krolak, Data analysis of gravitational wave signals from spinning neutron stars. 4. An All sky search, Phys. Rev. D 65, 042003 (2002), arXiv:gr-qc/0012108

    2002 arXiv

  39. [46]

    Krishnan, A

    B. Krishnan, A. M. Sintes, M. A. Papa, B. F. Schutz, S. Frasca, and C. Palomba, The Hough transform search for continuous gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D 70, 082001 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0407001

    2004 arXiv

  40. [47]

    Wette, Searches for continuous gravitational waves from neutron stars: A twenty-year retrospective, Astropart

    K. Wette, Searches for continuous gravitational waves from neutron stars: A twenty-year retrospective, Astropart. Phys. 153, 102880 (2023), arXiv:2305.07106 [gr-qc]

    2023

  41. [48]

    Tenorio, D

    R. Tenorio, D. Keitel, and A. M. Sintes, Search Methods for Continuous Gravitational-Wave Signals from Unknown Sources in the Advanced-Detector Era, Universe 7, 474 (2021), arXiv:2111.12575 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  42. [49]

    Ashton, R

    G. Ashton, R. Prix, and D. I. Jones, Statistical characterization of pulsar glitches and their potential impact on searches for continuous gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D96, 063004 (2017), arXiv:1704.00742 [gr- qc]

    2017 arXiv

  43. [50]

    Ashton, R

    G. Ashton, R. Prix, and D. I. Jones, A semicoherent glitch-robust continuous-gravitational-wave search method, Phys. Rev. D 98, 063011 (2018), arXiv:1805.03314 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  44. [51]

    Mukherjee, C

    A. Mukherjee, C. Messenger, and K. Riles, Accretion- induced spin-wandering effects on the neutron star in Scorpius X-1: Implications for continuous gravitational wave searches, Phys. Rev. D 97, 043016 (2018), arXiv:1710.06185 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  45. [52]

    P. B. Covas, Effects of proper motion of neutron stars on continuous gravitational-wave searches, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 500, 5167 (2020), arXiv:2008.00983 [astro-ph.IM]

    2020 arXiv

  46. [53]

    Sieniawska, D

    M. Sieniawska, D. I. Jones, and A. L. Miller, 16 Measuring neutron star distances and properties with gravitational-wave parallax, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 521, 1924 (2023), arXiv:2212.07506 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  47. [54]

    R. Prix, S. Giampanis, and C. Messenger, Search method for long-duration gravitational-wave transients from neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D 84, 023007 (2011), arXiv:1104.1704 [gr-qc]

    2011 arXiv

  48. [55]

    P. D. Lasky, N. Sarin, and L. Sammut, Long- duration waveform models for millisecond magnetars born in binary neutron star mergers, https://dcc. ligo.org/LIGO-T1700408/public (2017), Tech. Rep. LIGO-T1700408

    2017

  49. [56]

    Sarin, P

    N. Sarin, P. D. Lasky, L. Sammut, and G. Ashton, X- ray guided gravitational-wave search for binary neutron star merger remnants, Phys. Rev. D98, 043011 (2018), arXiv:1805.01481 [astro-ph.HE]

    2018 arXiv

  50. [57]

    Siemonsen, T

    N. Siemonsen, T. May, and W. E. East, Modeling the black hole superradiance gravitational waveform, Phys. Rev. D 107, 104003 (2023), arXiv:2211.03845 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  51. [58]

    A. L. Miller, N. Singh, and C. Palomba, Enabling multimessenger astronomy with continuous gravitational waves: Early warning and sky localization of binary neutron stars in the Einstein Telescope, Phys. Rev. D 109, 043021 (2024), arXiv:2309.15808 [astro-ph.IM]

    2024 arXiv

  52. [59]

    Allen, E

    B. Allen, E. Goetz, D. Keitel, M. Landry, G. Mendell, R. Prix, K. Riles, and K. Wette, SFT Data Format Version 2–3 Specification, https://dcc.ligo.org/ LIGO-T040164 (2022), T040164

    2022

  53. [60]

    Astone, S

    P. Astone, S. Frasca, and C. Palomba, The short FFT database and the peak map for the hierarchical search of periodic sources, Class. Quant. Grav.22, S1197 (2005)

    2005

  54. [61]

    O. J. Piccinni, P. Astone, S. D’Antonio, S. Frasca, G. Intini, P. Leaci, S. Mastrogiovanni, A. Miller, C. Palomba, and A. Singhal, A new data analysis framework for the search of continuous gravitational wave signals, Class. Quant. Grav. 36, 015008 (2019), arXiv:1811.04730 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  55. [62]

    Astone, A

    P. Astone, A. Colla, S. D’Antonio, S. Frasca, and C. Palomba, Method for all-sky searches of continuous gravitational wave signals using the frequency-Hough transform, Phys. Rev. D 90, 042002 (2014), arXiv:1407.8333 [astro-ph.IM]

    2014 arXiv

  56. [63]

    Miller et al., Method to search for long duration gravitationalwavetransientsfromisolatedneutronstars using the generalized frequency-Hough transform, Phys

    A. Miller et al., Method to search for long duration gravitationalwavetransientsfromisolatedneutronstars using the generalized frequency-Hough transform, Phys. Rev. D 98, 102004 (2018), arXiv:1810.09784 [astro- ph.IM]

    2018 arXiv

  57. [64]

    Oliver, D

    M. Oliver, D. Keitel, and A. M. Sintes, Adaptive transient Hough method for long-duration gravitational wave transients, Phys. Rev. D 99, 104067 (2019), arXiv:1901.01820 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  58. [65]

    P. B. Covas and A. M. Sintes, New method to search for continuous gravitational waves from unknown neutron starsinbinarysystems,Phys.Rev.D 99,124019(2019), arXiv:1904.04873 [astro-ph.IM]

    2019 arXiv

  59. [66]

    Tenorio and J.-R

    R. Tenorio and J.-R. Mérou, FastTracks, https:// github.com/Rodrigo-Tenorio/fasttracks (2024)

    2024

  60. [67]

    Wette, Estimating the sensitivity of wide-parameter- space searches for gravitational-wave pulsars, Phys

    K. Wette, Estimating the sensitivity of wide-parameter- space searches for gravitational-wave pulsars, Phys. Rev. D 85, 042003 (2012), arXiv:1111.5650 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  61. [68]

    Dreissigacker, R

    C. Dreissigacker, R. Prix, and K. Wette, Fast and Accurate Sensitivity Estimation for Continuous- Gravitational-Wave Searches, Phys. Rev. D98, 084058 (2018), arXiv:1808.02459 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  62. [69]

    Mirasola and R

    L. Mirasola and R. Tenorio, Towards a computationally- efficient follow-up pipeline for blind continuous gravitational-wave searches, arXiv e-prints (2024), arXiv:2405.18934 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  63. [70]

    Tenorio and L

    R. Tenorio and L. Mirasola, cows3: continuous-wave search sensitivity simulator, https://github.com/Rodrigo-Tenorio/ continuous-wave-search-sensitivity-simulator (2024), v0.1.0

    2024

  64. [71]

    Abbott et al

    R. Abbott et al. (KAGRA, VIRGO, LIGO Scientific), Open Data from the Third Observing Run of LIGO, Virgo, KAGRA, and GEO, Astrophys. J. Suppl.267, 29 (2023), arXiv:2302.03676 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  65. [72]

    C.Cutler, I.Gholami,andB.Krishnan,Improvedstack- slide searches for gravitational-wave pulsars, Phys. Rev. D 72, 042004 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0505082

    2005 arXiv

  66. [73]

    Prix and M

    R. Prix and M. Shaltev, Search for Continuous Gravitational Waves: Optimal StackSlide method at fixed computing cost, Phys. Rev. D85, 084010 (2012), arXiv:1201.4321 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  67. [74]

    Dergachev, Description of PowerFlux algorithms and implementation, https://dcc.ligo.org/ LIGO-T050186/public (2006)

    V. Dergachev, Description of PowerFlux algorithms and implementation, https://dcc.ligo.org/ LIGO-T050186/public (2006)

    2006

  68. [75]

    Dergachev, Description of PowerFlux 2 algorithms and implementation, https://dcc.ligo.org/ LIGO-T1000272/public (2011)

    V. Dergachev, Description of PowerFlux 2 algorithms and implementation, https://dcc.ligo.org/ LIGO-T1000272/public (2011)

    2011

  69. [76]

    P. B. Covas and R. Prix, Improved short-segment detection statistic for continuous gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D105, 124007 (2022), arXiv:2203.08723 [gr- qc]

    2022 arXiv

  70. [77]

    Tenorio and D

    R. Tenorio and D. Gerosa, SFTs: a scalable data- analysis framework for long-duration gravitational-wave signals, arXiv e-prints (2025), arXiv:2502.11823 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  71. [78]

    Messenger, A semi-coherent search strategy for known continuous wave sources in binary systems, Phys

    C. Messenger, A semi-coherent search strategy for known continuous wave sources in binary systems, Phys. Rev. D 84, 083003 (2011), arXiv:1109.0501 [gr-qc]

    2011 arXiv

  72. [79]

    Leaci and R

    P. Leaci and R. Prix, Directed searches for continuous gravitational waves from binary systems: parameter- space metrics and optimal Scorpius X-1 sensitivity, Phys. Rev. D91, 102003 (2015), arXiv:1502.00914 [gr- qc]

    2015 arXiv

  73. [80]

    Palomba, P

    C. Palomba, P. Astone, and S. Frasca, Adaptive hough transform for the search of periodic sources, Class. Quant. Grav. 22, S1255 (2005)

    2005

  74. [81]

    Abbott et al

    B. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific), All-sky search for periodic gravitational waves in LIGO S4 data, Phys. Rev. D 77, 022001 (2008), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 80, 129904 (2009)], arXiv:0708.3818 [gr-qc]

    2008 arXiv

  75. [82]

    Prix, The F-statistic and its implementation in ComputeFstatistic_v2, https://dcc.ligo.org/ LIGO-T0900149/public (2019)

    R. Prix, The F-statistic and its implementation in ComputeFstatistic_v2, https://dcc.ligo.org/ LIGO-T0900149/public (2019)

    2019

  76. [83]

    Allen, M

    B. Allen, M. A. Papa, and B. F. Schutz, Optimal strategies for sinusoidal signal detection, Phys. Rev. D 66, 102003 (2002), arXiv:gr-qc/0206032

    2002 arXiv

  77. [84]

    Prix,F-statistic bias due to noise-estimator,https: //dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-T1100551/public (2011)

    R. Prix,F-statistic bias due to noise-estimator,https: //dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-T1100551/public (2011)

    2011

  78. [85]

    Rover, R

    C. Rover, R. Meyer, and N. Christensen, Modelling coloured residual noise in gravitational-wave signal processing, Class. Quant. Grav. 28, 015010 (2011), arXiv:0804.3853 [stat.ME]

    2011 arXiv

  79. [86]

    Rover, A Student-t based filter for robust signal detection, Phys

    C. Rover, A Student-t based filter for robust signal detection, Phys. Rev. D 84, 122004 (2011), arXiv:1109.0442 [physics.data-an]

    2011 arXiv

  80. [87]

    Sasli, N

    A. Sasli, N. Karnesis, and N. Stergioulas, Heavy- tailed likelihoods for robustness against data outliers: 17 Applications to the analysis of gravitational wave data, Phys. Rev. D108, 103005 (2023), arXiv:2305.04709 [gr- qc]

    2023 arXiv

  81. [88]

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, and KAGRA Collaboration, LVK Algorithm Library - LALSuite, Free software (GPL) (2018)

    2018

  82. [89]

    Prix, Search for continuous gravitational waves: Metric of the multi-detector F-statistic, Phys

    R. Prix, Search for continuous gravitational waves: Metric of the multi-detector F-statistic, Phys. Rev. D 75, 023004 (2007), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 75, 069901 (2007)], arXiv:gr-qc/0606088

    2007 arXiv

  83. [90]

    Prix, Template-based searches for gravitational waves: Efficient lattice covering of flat parameter spaces, Class

    R. Prix, Template-based searches for gravitational waves: Efficient lattice covering of flat parameter spaces, Class. Quant. Grav. 24, S481 (2007), arXiv:0707.0428 [gr-qc]

    2007 arXiv

  84. [91]

    Allen, Optimal template banks, Phys

    B. Allen, Optimal template banks, Phys. Rev. D104, 042005 (2021), arXiv:2102.11254 [astro-ph.IM]

    2021 arXiv

  85. [92]

    P. R. Williams and B. F. Schutz, An Efficient matched filtering algorithm for the detection of continuous gravitational wave signals, AIP Conf. Proc. 523, 473 (2000), arXiv:gr-qc/9912029

    2000 arXiv

  86. [93]

    H. J. Pletsch and B. Allen, Exploiting global correlations to detect continuous gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 181102 (2009), arXiv:0906.0023 [gr-qc]

    2009 arXiv

  87. [94]

    Patel, X

    P. Patel, X. Siemens, R. Dupuis, and J. Betzwieser, Implementation of barycentric resampling for continuous wave searches in gravitational wave data, Phys. Rev. D81, 084032 (2010), arXiv:0912.4255 [gr-qc]

    2010 arXiv

  88. [95]

    Dergachev, On blind searches for noise dominated signals: a loosely coherent approach, Class

    V. Dergachev, On blind searches for noise dominated signals: a loosely coherent approach, Class. Quant. Grav. 27, 205017 (2010), arXiv:1003.2178 [gr-qc]

    2010 arXiv

  89. [96]

    Dergachev, Loosely coherent searches for sets of well-modeled signals, Phys

    V. Dergachev, Loosely coherent searches for sets of well-modeled signals, Phys. Rev. D85, 062003 (2012), arXiv:1110.3297 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  90. [97]

    G. D. Meadors, B. Krishnan, M. A. Papa, J. T. Whelan, and Y. Zhang, Resampling to accelerate cross- correlation searches for continuous gravitational waves from binary systems, Phys. Rev. D97, 044017 (2018), arXiv:1712.06515 [astro-ph.IM]

    2018 arXiv

  91. [98]

    Wette, S

    K. Wette, S. Walsh, R. Prix, and M. A. Papa, Implementing a semicoherent search for continuous gravitational waves using optimally-constructed template banks, Phys. Rev. D 97, 123016 (2018), arXiv:1804.03392 [astro-ph.IM]

    2018 arXiv

  92. [99]

    Dergachev, Loosely coherent searches for medium scale coherence lengths, arXiv e-prints (2018), arXiv:1807.02351 [astro-ph.IM]

    V. Dergachev, Loosely coherent searches for medium scale coherence lengths, arXiv e-prints (2018), arXiv:1807.02351 [astro-ph.IM]

    2018 arXiv

  93. [100]

    V.DergachevandM.A.Papa,Sensitivityimprovements in the search for periodic gravitational waves using O1 LIGO data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 101101 (2019), arXiv:1902.05530 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  94. [101]

    P. B. Covas and R. Prix, Improved all-sky search method for continuous gravitational waves from unknown neutron stars in binary systems, Phys. Rev. D 106, 084035 (2022), arXiv:2208.01543 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  95. [102]

    Andrés-Carcasona, O

    M. Andrés-Carcasona, O. J. Piccinni, M. Martínez, and L.-M. Mir, BSD-COBI: New search pipeline to target inspiraling light dark compact objects., PoS EPS- HEP2023, 067 (2024)

    2024

  96. [103]

    A. L. Miller, N. Aggarwal, S. Clesse, F. De Lillo, S. Sachdev, P. Astone, C. Palomba, O. J. Piccinni, and L. Pierini, Method to search for inspiraling planetary- mass ultracompact binaries using the generalized frequency-Hough transform in LIGO O3a data, Phys. Rev. D 110, 0820...

    2024 arXiv

  97. [104]

    Vingelmann, and F

    NVIDIA, P. Vingelmann, and F. H. Fitzek, Cuda, release: 10.2.89, https://developer.nvidia.com/ cuda-toolkit (2020)

    2020

  98. [105]

    Keitel and G

    D. Keitel and G. Ashton, Faster search for long gravitational-wave transients: GPU implementation of the transient F-statistic, Class. Quant. Grav. 35, 205003 (2018), arXiv:1805.05652 [astro-ph.IM]

    2018 arXiv

  99. [106]

    I. L. Rosa, P. Astone, S. D’Antonio, S. Frasca, P. Leaci, A. L. Miller, C. Palomba, O. J. Piccinni, L. Pierini, and T. Regimbau, Continuous Gravitational-Wave Data Analysis with General Purpose Computing on Graphic Processing Units, Universe7, 218 (2021)

    2021

  100. [107]

    L. Dunn, P. Clearwater, A. Melatos, and K. Wette, Graphics processing unit implementation of the -statistic for continuous gravitational wave searches, Class. Quant. Grav. 39, 045003 (2022), arXiv:2201.00451 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  101. [108]

    Bejger et al., polgraw-allsky, https://github

    M. Bejger et al., polgraw-allsky, https://github. com/mbejger/polgraw-allsky

  102. [109]

    Frostig, M

    R. Frostig, M. Johnson, and C. Leary, Compiling machinelearningprogramsviahigh-leveltracing(2018)

    2018

  103. [110]

    Bradbury, R

    J. Bradbury, R. Frostig, P. Hawkins, M. J. Johnson, C. Leary, D. Maclaurin, G. Necula, A. Paszke, J. VanderPlas, S. Wanderman-Milne, and Q. Zhang, JAX: composable transformations of Python+NumPy programs, http://github.com/jax-ml/jax (2018)

    2018

  104. [111]

    C. R. Harris, K. J. Millman, S. J. van der Walt, R. Gommers, P. Virtanen, D. Cournapeau, E. Wieser, J. Taylor, S. Berg, N. J. Smith, R. Kern, M. Picus, S. Hoyer, M. H. van Kerkwijk, M. Brett, A. Haldane, J. F. del Río, M. Wiebe, P. Peterson, P. Gérard- Marchant, K. Sheppard, T...

    2020

  105. [112]

    Okuta, Y

    R. Okuta, Y. Unno, D. Nishino, S. Hido, and C. Loomis, Cupy: A numpy-compatible library for nvidia gpu calculations, in Proceedings of Workshop on Machine Learning Systems (LearningSys) in The Thirty-first Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS)(2017)

    2017

  106. [113]

    Paszke, S

    A. Paszke, S. Gross, F. Massa, A. Lerer, J. Bradbury, G.Chanan, T.Killeen, Z.Lin, N.Gimelshein, L.Antiga, A. Desmaison, A. Köpf, E. Yang, Z. DeVito, M. Raison, A. Tejani, S. Chilamkurthy, B. Steiner, L. Fang, J. Bai, and S. Chintala, PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High- Perform...

    2019 arXiv

  107. [114]

    Prix and B

    R. Prix and B. Krishnan, Targeted search for continuous gravitational waves: Bayesian versus maximum- likelihood statistics, Class. Quant. Grav. 26, 204013 (2009), arXiv:0907.2569 [gr-qc]

    2009 arXiv

  108. [115]

    K. J. Wagner, J. T. Whelan, J. K. Wofford, and K. Wette, Template lattices for a cross-correlation search for gravitational waves from Scorpius X-1, Class. Quant. Grav. 39, 075013 (2022), arXiv:2106.16142 [gr- qc]

    2022 arXiv

  109. [116]

    H. J. Pletsch, Parameter-space metric of semicoherent searches for continuous gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D 82, 042002 (2010), arXiv:1005.0395 [gr-qc]

    2010 arXiv

  110. [117]

    Keitel, G

    D. Keitel, G. Woan, M. Pitkin, C. Schumacher, B. Pearlstone, K. Riles, A. G. Lyne, J. Palfreyman, B. Stappers, and P. Weltevrede, First search for long- duration transient gravitational waves after glitches in 18 the Vela and Crab pulsars, Phys. Rev. D100, 064058 (2019), arXiv...

    2019 arXiv

  111. [118]

    R.Tenorio, L.M.Modafferi, D.Keitel,andA.M.Sintes, Empirically estimating the distribution of the loudest candidate from a gravitational-wave search, Phys. Rev. D 105, 044029 (2022), arXiv:2111.12032 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  112. [119]

    Abbott et al

    R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, KAGRA, VIRGO), Narrowband Searches for Continuous and Long- duration Transient Gravitational Waves from Known Pulsars in the LIGO-Virgo Third Observing Run, Astrophys. J.932, 133 (2022), arXiv:2112.10990 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  113. [120]

    Wette, L

    K. Wette, L. Dunn, P. Clearwater, and A. Melatos, Deep exploration for continuous gravitational waves at 171–172 Hz in LIGO second observing run data, Phys. Rev. D 103, 083020 (2021), arXiv:2103.12976 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  114. [121]

    P. B. Covas et al., Identification and mitigation of narrow spectral artifacts that degrade searches for persistent gravitational waves in the first two observing runs of Advanced LIGO, Phys. Rev. D 97, 082002 (2018), arXiv:1801.07204 [astro-ph.IM]

    2018 arXiv

  115. [122]

    Singh, M

    A. Singh, M. A. Papa, H.-B. Eggenstein, and S. Walsh, Adaptive clustering procedure for continuous gravitational wave searches, Phys. Rev. D96, 082003 (2017), arXiv:1707.02676 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  116. [123]

    F.Morawski, M.Bejger,andP.Ciecieląg,Convolutional neural network classifier for the output of the time-domain F-statistic all-sky search for continuous gravitational waves, Machine Learning: Science and Technology 1, 025016 (2020)

    2020

  117. [124]

    Tenorio, D

    R. Tenorio, D. Keitel, and A. M. Sintes, Time-frequency track distance for comparing continuous gravitational wave signals, Phys. Rev. D 103, 064053 (2021), arXiv:2012.05752 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  118. [125]

    Beheshtipour and M

    B. Beheshtipour and M. A. Papa, Deep learning for clustering of continuous gravitational wave candidates, Phys. Rev. D101, 064009 (2020), arXiv:2001.03116 [gr- qc]

    2020 arXiv

  119. [126]

    Beheshtipour and M

    B. Beheshtipour and M. A. Papa, Deep learning for clustering of continuous gravitational wave candidates II: identification of low-SNR candidates, Phys. Rev. D 103, 064027 (2021), arXiv:2012.04381 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  120. [127]

    Steltner, T

    B. Steltner, T. Menne, M. A. Papa, and H.- B. Eggenstein, Density-clustering of continuous gravitational wave candidates from large surveys, Phys. Rev. D 106, 104063 (2022), arXiv:2207.14286 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  121. [128]

    Wette and R

    K. Wette and R. Prix, Flat parameter-space metric for all-sky searches for gravitational-wave pulsars, Phys. Rev. D 88, 123005 (2013), arXiv:1310.5587 [gr-qc]

    2013 arXiv

  122. [129]

    Wette, Empirically extending the range of validity of parameter-space metrics for all-sky searches for gravitational-wave pulsars, Phys

    K. Wette, Empirically extending the range of validity of parameter-space metrics for all-sky searches for gravitational-wave pulsars, Phys. Rev. D 94, 122002 (2016), arXiv:1607.00241 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  123. [131]

    Coogan, T

    A. Coogan, T. D. P. Edwards, H. S. Chia, R. N. George, K. Freese, C. Messick, C. N. Setzer, C. Weniger, and A. Zimmerman, Efficient gravitational wave template bank generation with differentiable waveforms, Phys. Rev. D 106, 122001 (2022), arXiv:2202.09380 [astro- ph.IM]

    2022 arXiv

  124. [132]

    Agrell and B

    E. Agrell and B. Allen, On the Best Lattice Quantizers, IEEE Trans. Info. Theor.69, 7650 (2023), arXiv:2202.09605 [cs.IT]

    2023 arXiv

  125. [133]

    Allen, Performance of random template banks, Phys

    B. Allen, Performance of random template banks, Phys. Rev. D 105, 102003 (2022), arXiv:2203.02759 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  126. [134]

    Behnke, M

    B. Behnke, M. A. Papa, and R. Prix, Postprocessing methods used in the search for continuous gravitational- wave signals from the Galactic Center, Phys. Rev. D91, 064007 (2015), arXiv:1410.5997 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  127. [135]

    Wette, R

    K. Wette, R. Prix, D. Keitel, M. Pitkin, C. Dreissigacker, J. T. Whelan, and P. Leaci, OctApps: a library of Octave functions for continuous gravitational-wave data analysis, Journal of Open Source Software 3, 707 (2018)

    2018

  128. [136]

    Abbott et al

    R. Abbott et al. (KAGRA, LIGO Scientific, VIRGO), Search for continuous gravitational wave emission from the Milky Way center in O3 LIGO-Virgo data, Phys. Rev. D 106, 042003 (2022), arXiv:2204.04523 [astro- ph.HE]

    2022 arXiv

  129. [137]

    Abbott et al

    R. Abbott et al. (KAGRA, LIGO Scientific, VIRGO), All-sky search for continuous gravitational waves from isolated neutron stars using Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo O3 data, Phys. Rev. D 106, 102008 (2022), arXiv:2201.00697 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  130. [138]

    A. C. Searle, Monte-Carlo and Bayesian techniques in gravitational wave burst data analysis, in 12th Gravitational Wave Data Analysis Workshop (2008) arXiv:0804.1161 [gr-qc]

    2008 arXiv

  131. [139]

    Prix, Analytic weak-signal approximation of the Bayes factor for continuous gravitational waves, arXiv e-prints (2024), arXiv:2409.13069 [gr-qc]

    R. Prix, Analytic weak-signal approximation of the Bayes factor for continuous gravitational waves, arXiv e-prints (2024), arXiv:2409.13069 [gr-qc]

    2024

  132. [140]

    Keitel, R

    D. Keitel, R. Prix, M. A. Papa, P. Leaci, and M. Siddiqi, Search for continuous gravitational waves: Improving robustness versus instrumental artifacts, Phys. Rev. D 89, 064023 (2014), arXiv:1311.5738 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  133. [141]

    Keitel, Robust semicoherent searches for continuous gravitational waves with noise and signal models including hours to days long transients, Phys

    D. Keitel, Robust semicoherent searches for continuous gravitational waves with noise and signal models including hours to days long transients, Phys. Rev. D 93, 084024 (2016), arXiv:1509.02398 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  134. [142]

    Abbott et al

    R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo, VIRGO), All-sky search in early O3 LIGO data for continuous gravitational-wave signals from unknown neutron stars in binary systems, Phys. Rev. D 103, 064017 (2021), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 108, 069901 (2023)], arXiv:2012.12128 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  135. [143]

    Tenorio, D

    R. Tenorio, D. Keitel, and A. M. Sintes, Application of a hierarchical MCMC follow-up to Advanced LIGO continuous gravitational-wave candidates, Phys. Rev. D 104, 084012 (2021), arXiv:2105.13860 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  136. [144]

    P. B. Covas, R. Prix, and J. Martins, New framework to follow up candidates from continuous gravitational- wave searches, Phys. Rev. D 110, 024053 (2024), arXiv:2404.18608 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  137. [145]

    P. B. Covas, Searching for continuous gravitational waves with Advanced LIGO, Ph.D. thesis, University of the Balearic Islands (2020)

    2020

  138. [146]

    Krishnnan and A

    B. Krishnnan and A. M. Sintes, Hough search with improved sensitivity, https://dcc.ligo.org/ LIGO-T070124/public (2007)

    2007

  139. [147]

    Tenorio, Rodrigo and Williams, Michael J., and Bayley, Joseph and Messenger, Chris and others, in prep., https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-P2200295 (2024)

    2024

  140. [148]

    L. G. Bretthorst, Bayesian Spectrum Analysis and Parameter Estimations(Springer New York, NY, 1988)

    1988

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.