Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Strongly Coupled PT-Symmetric Models in Holography

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Holographic non-Hermitian lattices flow from a PT-broken ultraviolet to a PT-unbroken infrared fixed point, restoring unitarity at low energies.

desk verdict A clear self-review of the authors' own non-Hermitian holography program; the headline PT-restoring IR claim is numerically provisional and needs more care than the abstract suggests. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.18471 v1 pith:22Q24LNV submitted 2024-11-27 hep-th cond-mat.str-elhep-phquant-ph

Daniel Arean , David Garcia-Fariña , Karl Landsteiner This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thcond-mat.str-elhep-phquant-ph
keywords non-HermitianphysicsPT-symmetrygauge/gravitydualityholographicQFTnullenergyconditionDysonmaplatticesIRPTrestoration
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review consolidates a holographic approach to strongly coupled quantum field theories with PT-symmetric non-Hermitian deformations, where the non-Hermiticity enters through the sources of a charged scalar operator. The paper's central claim is that spatially modulated non-Hermitian lattices flow from a PT-broken ultraviolet to a PT-unbroken infrared fixed point, even though the ultraviolet geometry remains real and the symmetry is broken only by an imaginary current. Along the way it assembles the evidence that constant non-Hermitian sources produce three phases with distinctive transport, that Dyson maps act as complexified gauge transformations in the bulk, and that non-Hermitian quenches violate the null energy condition and shrink the apparent horizon. The review matters because it provides a non-perturbative window into open quantum systems, where unitarity can be recovered at low energies through PT restoration.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the holographic dictionary itself, specialized to a bottom-up model with a U(1) gauge field and a complex scalar of mass $m^2=-2$ whose boundary sources $s=(1-\eta)M$, $\bar s=(1+\eta)M$ encode the non-Hermitian deformation. The Dyson map, a similarity transformation that maps a PT-unbroken non-Hermitian theory to an equivalent Hermitian theory, is implemented as a complexified gauge transformation acting on the boundary sources and gauge field; this is the object that connects the PT-broken lattice to the PT-unbroken IR fixed point. The IR analysis is carried out by monitoring the spatially averaged Ricci scalar and the modulus of the scalar, which are shown to converge to the values of the Hermitian conformal fixed point (39)/(40).

What would settle it

Solve the zero-temperature non-Hermitian lattice with high numerical precision for a range of amplitudes $a$ and cell lengths $LM$, and extract the infrared asymptotics of the metric and scalar field; if the geometry does not converge to the Dyson-rotated Hermitian fixed point (40) with $S$ given by (41)-(42) deep in the bulk, or if the convergence fails for $|a|$ near 1, the claimed PT-restoring flow in the IR is not realized.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central result this review presents is that a strongly coupled non-Hermitian lattice, with sources $\eta(x^1)=a\cos(2\pi x^1/L)$, flows from a PT-broken ultraviolet to a PT-unbroken infrared. In the ultraviolet the geometry is real and the null energy condition may be violated locally, but PT is spontaneously broken by an odd, purely imaginary expectation value of the current $\langle J_1\rangle$, a mechanism that does not require complex bulk geometry. In the deep infrared the spatially averaged metric and scalar approach the values of a Hermitian conformal fixed point, and the full solution takes the form of that fixed point rotated by a complexified U(1) transformation, i.e. a Dyson map of the form (22), with $S=\sqrt{(1-\tilde\eta)/(1+\tilde\eta)}$ and $\tilde\eta/\sqrt{1-\tilde\eta^2}=\eta$. Because the Dyson-related Hermitian fixed point is PT-unbroken, the flow restores PT symmetry in the IR. The review also consolidates the companion results for constant sources (three phases, with the Ferrel-Glover-Tinkham sum rule holding even in the PT-broken branch) and for quenches (null energy condition violation and horizon shrinkage).

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the holographic dictionary remains a valid description of a quantum field theory when the boundary sources and free energy are complex, and when the bulk metric can become complex or violate the null energy condition, so that the PT-broken phases and the IR fixed point are genuine QFT regimes rather than artifacts of complexified gravity.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If PT restoration in the IR is generic for inhomogeneous non-Hermitian deformations, then open quantum systems with balanced gain and loss admit a low-energy Hermitian description, making their infrared dynamics tractable with standard methods.
  • The FGT sum rule holding in all three constant-source phases, including the PT-broken one, means conductivity measurements cannot by themselves detect the loss of unitarity; a complex charge density in phase III is a sharper signature.
  • Non-Hermitian quenches that violate the null energy condition lower the apparent horizon temperature, a 'non-Hermitian cooling' mechanism that should also occur in weakly coupled PT-symmetric systems and might be tested in the laboratory.
  • The existence of PT-breaking solutions with real geometry and an imaginary current enlarges the menu of holographic models with broken unitarity beyond complex-metric constructions, which may simplify future phenomenological studies.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If IR PT restoration is generic for inhomogeneous non-Hermitian deformations, low-energy effective theories of PT-symmetric open systems should be Hermitian, making the non-Hermiticity an ultraviolet phenomenon that flows away.
  • The local increase of the a-function in regions with $|\eta|>1$ suggests that standard holographic c-theorems fail for NEC-violating flows; a numerical search for any monotone function along the lattice RG flow would settle this.
  • The shrinking-horizon cooling effect might be observable in PT-symmetric photonic or atomic lattices as a transient temperature drop after a quench, though the holographic strong-coupling setting does not map directly onto those experiments.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a review article on holographic models of strongly coupled PT-symmetric quantum field theories. It introduces gauge/gravity duality, presents a bottom-up holographic model with a complex scalar operator charged under U(1) and non-Hermitian sources, and summarizes the phase diagram and electric conductivity for constant sources at zero and nonzero chemical potential. It then reviews spacetime-dependent sources: non-Hermitian quenches, which violate the null energy condition and shrink the apparent horizon, and non-Hermitian lattices, which exhibit a purely imaginary current that spontaneously breaks PT symmetry. The paper's central new claim, stated in the abstract and Section 5.2, is that these non-Hermitian lattices flow to a PT-symmetric fixed point in the IR because the IR geometry is related by a Dyson map to a Hermitian conformal fixed point.

Significance. If the central claim is trustworthy, the review provides a valuable synthesis of a rapidly developing area at the interface of non-Hermitian physics and holography, and it highlights a potentially generic phenomenon: IR PT-symmetry restoration in inhomogeneous non-Hmitian systems. The review is clearly organized and gives a faithful account of several peer-reviewed results, including the phase diagram and the Ferrel-Glover-Tinkham sum rule from [25] and the quench dynamics from [26]. The explicit discussion of the Dyson map in the gravitational bulk and its relation to external gauge transformations is instructive. However, the paper's most novel assertion—the PT-restoring IR fixed point—derives from an unreviewed preprint by two of the authors, and the logical evidence presented in this review is incomplete, as detailed in the major comments.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 5.2, Eqs. (40)-(42)] The claim that the IR geometry restores PT symmetry is underdetermined. The review itself notes after Eq. (23) that the Dyson map is not a gauge symmetry and that theories connected by Dyson maps describe different physical settings. A complexified U(1) bulk gauge transformation changes the boundary conditions (23), so it is not a redundancy of the boundary theory. Geometric equivalence of the IR solution (40) to the Hermitian fixed point (39) is necessary but not sufficient to establish that the dual QFT has a PT-unbroken spectrum; the dual theory could still have complex masses or quasinormal frequencies even if the background metric is a pure gauge transform of a Hermitian solution. To support the abstract's assertion, the authors should provide spectral evidence (e.g., real quasinormal frequencies or real two-point functions) or explicitly temper the claim to a geometric statement. Additionally, the review does not report numerical error bars or convergence tests for the lattice solutions in Figures 7-12 that underlie the IR-restoration claim.
  2. [Section 5.2, a-function paragraph] The review acknowledges that the standard a-function locally increases toward the IR for |a|>1 and states that this is 'potentially problematic' because it suggests an increase in the number of degrees of freedom along the RG flow. The authors correctly note that a non-monotonic standard a-function does not by itself prove a genuine increase of degrees of freedom, yet they continue to use the language of an 'RG flow' to a 'fixed point' in the abstract and conclusions. This unresolved tension should be stated as an explicit caveat wherever the IR fixed point is discussed, or the authors should offer a more definitive interpretation of the a-function under null energy condition violation.
  3. [Sections 2 and 4.1] The review assumes that the standard holographic dictionary (Eqs. (5)-(7)) remains valid when the boundary sources are complex, the free energy is complex, and the bulk metric is complex or violates the null energy condition. These conditions apply to phases II and III of Section 4.1 and to the IR solution discussed in Section 5.2. Since this assumption is foundational for the interpretation of all the results reviewed, the authors should explicitly identify it as an open issue rather than silently relying on it. A single sentence in Section 2 or 3 stating the limits of the holographic dictionary in the non-Hermitian context would suffice.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (3)] The eigenvectors ψ+ and ψ− are displayed with identical expressions except for the overall eigenvalue; the second component appears to be '1' in both cases, which cannot be correct for two distinct eigenvectors. Please check the second component and the prefactor.
  2. [Section 2] Typo: 'sources have to be added trough boundary conditions' should read 'through boundary conditions.'
  3. [Throughout] The typesetting 'P T' with a space is unconventional and inconsistent; use 'PT' consistently throughout.
  4. [Section 5.1] The phrase 'completely analogue time dependence' should be 'completely analogous time dependence.'
  5. [Figure 11 caption] The caption says 'standard deviation of R at zero temperature' without specifying the ensemble; this presumably means the spatial standard deviation along x1, and that should be stated explicitly to avoid confusion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central lattice claim is inherited from a same-author numerical preprint, but it is an externally checkable result and the Dyson-map reasoning is a standard equivalence, not a by-construction reduction.

full rationale

This manuscript is a review, not a new derivation. Its headline claim, that non-Hermitian lattices flow to a PT-symmetric IR fixed point, is presented as a summary of the numerical study in [27], whose authors overlap with the present review. That is a self-citation, but the cited work is a parameter-free numerical PDE study with stated assumptions (the bottom-up action (14), the ansatz (37), and the DeTurck method), and it is externally checkable; the review does not fit any parameter, rename a fit as a prediction, or define the IR fixed point into existence. The inference from the IR solution (40) to PT restoration is the standard Dyson-map criterion: if a complexified gauge transformation of the form (22) connects the solution to the Hermitian fixed point (39), the theory admits a Hermitian description and therefore has unbroken PT. Although Section 3 stresses that a Dyson map is not a gauge symmetry and connects different physical settings, that caveat is a limitation on the interpretation, not a circular reduction. The paper itself flags the a-function caveat for |a|>1 as 'potentially problematic,' which is an honest correctness concern, not circularity. No equation in the paper is made true by definition, and no fitted input is relabeled as a prediction. The self-citation weight is real but does not rise to circularity under the stated evidentiary rules.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The review rests on the bottom-up model of [24] with hand-chosen parameters (v=3, q=2, m^2=-2) and on the holographic dictionary. No new entities are introduced; the key assumptions are the validity of the bulk-to-boundary map for complex sources and the reliability of the numerical solutions.

free parameters (4)
  • v (scalar self-coupling) = 3
    Set to 3 so that the zero-temperature dual QFT has an RG flow between two CFTs (Section 3, action (14); reference [28]).
  • q (U(1) charge) = 1 (2 for zero-temperature IR fixed point)
    Set to unity unless stated; set to q=2 for zero-T solutions to ensure a conformal IR fixed point (Section 5.2, footnote 4).
  • m^2 (scalar mass) = -2
    Chosen so the dual operator has conformal dimension Delta=2 (Section 3).
  • Lambda (cosmological constant) = -3
    Sets AdS radius to 1 (Section 3, action (14)).
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Gauge/gravity duality: Z_QFT[J] = Z_grav[phi0=J] and the classical gravity approximation is valid at large N and strong coupling.
    Invoked in Section 2 and used throughout to interpret bulk solutions as QFT results.
  • domain assumption The complexified U(1) transformation (Dyson map) relates the non-Hermitian theory to a Hermitian one and the holographic dictionary maps it to a bulk gauge transformation.
    Key to interpreting the model; introduced in Section 3 around Eqs. (19)-(23).
  • ad hoc to paper The bottom-up action (14) with boundary conditions (17) is a valid holographic dual to a PT-symmetric QFT with a scalar operator of dimension Delta=2.
    The model is constructed to mimic the QFT, not derived from string theory; Section 3.
  • standard math Numerical solutions obtained with the DeTurck method converge to the correct stationary solutions of the Einstein equations.
    Used in Section 5.2 (Eq. (37) and following); no convergence tests shown in this review.
  • ad hoc to paper The standard a-function measures the number of degrees of freedom even when the NEC is violated.
    The review notes the a-function increases locally for |a|>1 and flags that this is potentially problematic (Section 5.2).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Strongly Coupled PT-Symmetric Models in Holography." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/22Q24LNV

@misc{pith2026241118471,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Strongly Coupled PT-Symmetric Models in Holography},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/22Q24LNV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.18471}
}
read the original abstract

Non-Hermitian quantum field theories are a promising tool to study open quantum systems. These theories preserve unitarity if PT-symmetry is respected, and in that case an equivalent Hermitian description exists via the so-called Dyson map. Generically, PT-symmetric non-Hermitian theories can also feature phases where PT-symmetry is broken and unitarity is lost. We review the construction of holographic duals to strongly coupled PT-symmetric quantum field theories and the study of their phase diagram. We next focus on spacetime-dependent non-Hermitian couplings: non-Hermitian quenches and lattices. They violate the null energy condition in the gravity dual. The lattices realize phases supporting an imaginary current that breaks PT-symmetry spontaneously. Remarkably, these non-Hermitian lattices flow to a PT-symmetric fixed point in the IR.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.18471 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Free energy Ω for the model with constant sources at T = 0 and µ = 0. Note how for |η| > 1 the free energy becomes complex thus signaling the spontaneous breaking of PT . This figure has been adapted from [24]. Note that this is a direct application of the holographic dictionary as J1 is the operator dual to δA1 and E1 is minus the time derivative of the corresponding source. Hence ⟨J1(ω)⟩ = ∂zα(z = 0) and E1(ω) = i… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Phase diagram for the model with constant sources at zero chemical potential (a) and non-zero chemical potential (b). Here N2 = (1 − η 2 )M2 . In (b) the color map represents the quantity Re[⟨O⟩ 2 ]/µ 4 . In figure (b) Phase I is found in the region with N2/µ 2 > 0 and the red curve denotes the transition between phase II (right) and phase III (left). The superconducting phase appears for |T/µ| < 0.02 and thus is no… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Conductivity σ in the three different phases of the model with constant sources for T ̸= 0 and µ = 0. The real (imaginary) part is denoted by solid (dashed) lines. The colors {blue, yellow, green, red} correspond to solutions with ⟨O⟩/(NT) = {−1.6, −1.7, −2.0, −3.5} in (a) and to solutions with ⟨O⟩/(NT) = {1.3, 0, −0.9, −1.3} in (b). In (c) The colors {blue, yellow, green} correspond to solutions with N2/|T| 2 = {−1… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Conductivity σ in phase II for the model with constant sources at T ̸= 0 and µ ̸= 0. The real (imaginary) part is denoted by solid (dashed) lines. The blue (orange) line denotes a solution with N2/µ 2 = −6.2 and T/µ=2.4 (N2/µ 2 = −0.063 and T/µ=0.22). The change of sig…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Expectation values of scalar operators, (imaginary) charge density and energy density for a quench with profile (33) for several values of τ which interpolates between the Hermitian point ηi = 0 and a final value ηf = 0.8 . (Adapted from [26]) The most interesting feat…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Left: The Null Energy Condition Tµνd µd ν ≥ 0 for the particular simulation of figure 5 with τ = 0.4 at different stages v/τ of the evolution. It is clearly violated, especially at the horizon z = 1 . Right: We display the size of the apparent horizon for the simulatio…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Expectation values of the operators ⟨O⟩ and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Imaginary part of the expectation value of the current ⟨J1⟩ in a non-Hermitian lattice with LM = 3. The real part is zero for any {a, T/M}. Figure taken from [27]. a=0.1 a=0.6 a=1.1 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 17.0 17.5 18.0 18.5 19.0 x1 M 〈 Ttt 〉 / M 3 (a) T/M = 0.…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Expectation value of the energy density ⟨Ttt⟩ in a Non-Hermitian lattice with LM = 3. Figure taken from [27] [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Violation of the NEC for a stable non-Hermitian lattice with T/M = 0.5 LM = 3 and a = 1.7. The orange surface denotes TMNuMu N and the red one is the surface TMNuMu N = 0 for reference. Here u is an infalling null geodesic. Figure taken from [27] [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:fig…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Left: spatial average of the Ricci scalar R at zero temperature. The red dashed line shows the value R = −12 − 4v corresponding to the IR fixed point (40). Right: standard deviation of R at zero temperature. The radial coordinate u is defined as u = z/(1 − z). In [27]…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Left: square root of the spatial average of ϕϕ¯ at zero temperature. The red dashed line depicts the value √ 2/v corresponding to the IR fixed point (40). Right: square root of the standard deviation of ϕϕ¯ at zero temperature. As above u = z/(1 − z) with S a x 1 -dep…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Non-Hermitian Holographic Flows to Little Rip Cosmologies

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    A holographic model of a non-Hermitian PT-symmetric QFT produces black hole interiors that are isotropic Little Rip cosmologies, separated from standard Kasner behavior by a distinctive logarithmic signature in heavy-...

  2. Selecting Complex Extremal Surfaces with the Kontsevich--Segal--Witten Criterion

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    In AdS3, dS3, and AdS4 hyperbolic examples, the Kontsevich-Segal-Witten criterion uniquely selects a three-piece complex contour for timelike extremal surfaces, while timelike strips in AdS4 violate the criterion near...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [27]

    Holographic Non-Hermitian Lattices and Junctions with PT-Restoring RG Flows 2024

    Arean, D.; Garcia-Fariña, D. Holographic Non-Hermitian Lattices and Junctions with PT-Restoring RG Flows 2024. [arXiv:hep- th/2410.13584]

    arXiv 2024

  2. [25]

    Electric conductivity in non-Hermitian holography

    Xian, Z.Y.; Rodríguez Fernández, D.; Chen, Z.; Liu, Y.; Meyer, R. Electric conductivity in non-Hermitian holography. SciPost Phys. 2024, 16, 004, [arXiv:hep-th/2304.11183]. https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.16.1.004

    arXiv 2024

  3. [26]

    Non-Hermitian quantum quenches in holography

    Morales-Tejera, S.; Landsteiner, K. Non-Hermitian quantum quenches in holography. SciPost Phys. 2023, 14, 030, [arXiv:hep- th/2203.02524]. https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.14.3.030

    arXiv 2023

  4. [1]

    Real spectra in nonHermitian Hamiltonians having PT symmetry

    Bender, C.M.; Boettcher, S. Real spectra in nonHermitian Hamiltonians having PT symmetry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1998, 80, 5243–5246, [physics/9712001]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.5243

    arXiv 1998

  5. [2]

    PseudoHermiticity versus PT symmetry 3: Equivalence of pseudoHermiticity and the presence of antilinear symmetries

    Mostafazadeh, A. PseudoHermiticity versus PT symmetry 3: Equivalence of pseudoHermiticity and the presence of antilinear symmetries. J. Math. Phys. 2002, 43, 3944–3951, [math-ph/0203005]. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1489072

    arXiv 2002

  6. [3]

    Antilinearity rather than Hermiticity as a guiding principle for quantum theory.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 2018, 51, [1512.04915]

    Mannheim, P .D. Antilinearity rather than Hermiticity as a guiding principle for quantum theory.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 2018, 51, [1512.04915]. https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/AAC035

    arXiv 2018

  7. [4]

    Introduction to PT-symmetric quantum theory

    Bender, C.M. Introduction to PT-symmetric quantum theory. Contemporary Physics 2005, 46, 277–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/00 107500072632

    work page doi:10.1080/00 2005

  8. [5]

    https://doi.org/10.1142/q0178

    Bender, C.M.; Dorey, P .E.; Dunning, C.; Fring, A.; Hook, D.W.; Jones, H.F.; Kuzhel, S.; Lévai, G.; Tateo, R.PT Symmetry; WORLD SCIENTIFIC (EUROPE), 2019; [https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/pdf/10.1142/q0178]. https://doi.org/10.1142/q0178

    doi:10.1142/q0178 2019

Show all 37 references
  1. [6]

    Time-Dependent Pseudo-Hermitian Hamiltonians and a Hidden Geometric Aspect of Quantum Mechanics

    Mostafazadeh, A. Time-Dependent Pseudo-Hermitian Hamiltonians and a Hidden Geometric Aspect of Quantum Mechanics. Entropy 2020, 22, 471, [arXiv:quant-ph/2004.05254]. https://doi.org/10.3390/e22040471

    2020 arXiv

  2. [7]

    Non-Hermitian physics

    Ashida, Y.; Gong, Z.; Ueda, M. Non-Hermitian physics. Adv. Phys. 2021, 69, 249–435, [arXiv:cond-mat.mes-hall/2006.01837]. https://doi.org/10.1080/00018732.2021.1876991

    2021 arXiv

  3. [8]

    An Introduction to PT-Symmetric Quantum Mechanics-Time-Dependent Systems

    Fring, A. An Introduction to PT-Symmetric Quantum Mechanics-Time-Dependent Systems. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2023, 2448, 012002, [arXiv:quant-ph/2201.05140]. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2448/1/012002

    2023 arXiv

  4. [9]

    Scalar Quantum Field Theory with a Complex Cubic Interaction

    Bender, C.M.; Brody, D.C.; Jones, H.F. Scalar Quantum Field Theory with a Complex Cubic Interaction. Physical Review Letters 2004, 93. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.93.251601

    2004 doi

  5. [10]

    Goldstone bosons and the Englert-Brout-Higgs mechanism in non-Hermitian theories

    Mannheim, P .D. Goldstone bosons and the Englert-Brout-Higgs mechanism in non-Hermitian theories. Phys. Rev. D 2019, 99, 045006, [arXiv:hep-th/1808.00437]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.045006

    2019 arXiv

  6. [11]

    Gauge invariance and the Englert-Brout-Higgs mechanism in non-Hermitian field theories

    Alexandre, J.; Ellis, J.; Millington, P .; Seynaeve, D. Gauge invariance and the Englert-Brout-Higgs mechanism in non-Hermitian field theories. Phys. Rev. D 2019, 99, 075024, [arXiv:hep-th/1808.00944]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.075024

    2019 arXiv

  7. [12]

    Pseudo-Hermitian approach to Goldstone’s theorem in non-Abelian non-Hermitian quantum field theories

    Fring, A.; Taira, T. Pseudo-Hermitian approach to Goldstone’s theorem in non-Abelian non-Hermitian quantum field theories. Phys. Rev. D 2020, 101, 045014, [arXiv:hep-th/1911.01405]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.045014

    2020 arXiv

  8. [13]

    Spontaneously Breaking Non-Abelian Gauge Symmetry in Non-Hermitian Field Theories

    Alexandre, J.; Ellis, J.; Millington, P .; Seynaeve, D. Spontaneously Breaking Non-Abelian Gauge Symmetry in Non-Hermitian Field Theories. Phys. Rev. D 2020, 101, 035008, [arXiv:hep-th/1910.03985]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.035008

    2020 arXiv

  9. [14]

    Spontaneous symmetry breaking and the Goldstone theorem in non-Hermitian field theories

    Alexandre, J.; Ellis, J.; Millington, P .; Seynaeve, D. Spontaneous symmetry breaking and the Goldstone theorem in non-Hermitian field theories. Phys. Rev. D 2018, 98, 045001, [arXiv:hep-th/1805.06380]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.045001

    2018 arXiv

  10. [15]

    Goldstone bosons in different PT-regimes of non-Hermitian scalar quantum field theories

    Fring, A.; Taira, T. Goldstone bosons in different PT-regimes of non-Hermitian scalar quantum field theories. Nucl. Phys. B 2020, 950, 114834, [arXiv:hep-th/1906.05738]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2019.114834

    2020 arXiv

  11. [16]

    Massive gauge particles versus Goldstone bosons in non-Hermitian non-Abelian gauge theory

    Fring, A.; Taira, T. Massive gauge particles versus Goldstone bosons in non-Hermitian non-Abelian gauge theory. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 2022, 137, 716, [arXiv:hep-th/2004.00723]. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-02889-z

    2022 arXiv

  12. [17]

    IR/UV mixing from local similarity maps of scalar non-Hermitian field theories

    Chernodub, M.N.; Millington, P . IR/UV mixing from local similarity maps of scalar non-Hermitian field theories. Phys. Rev. D 2022, 105, 076020, [arXiv:hep-th/2110.05289]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.076020

    2022 arXiv

  13. [18]

    Anomalous dispersion, superluminality and instabilities in two-flavour theories with local non-Hermitian mass mixing 2024

    Chernodub, M.N.; Millington, P . Anomalous dispersion, superluminality and instabilities in two-flavour theories with local non-Hermitian mass mixing 2024. [arXiv:hep-th/2401.06097]

    2024 arXiv

  14. [19]

    The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity

    Maldacena, J.M. The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 1998, 2, 231–252, [hep-th/9711200]. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026654312961

    1998 arXiv

  15. [20]

    Large N field theories, string theory and gravity

    Aharony, O.; Gubser, S.S.; Maldacena, J.M.; Ooguri, H.; Oz, Y. Large N field theories, string theory and gravity. Phys. Rept. 2000, 323, 183–386, [hep-th/9905111]. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-1573(99)00083-6

    arXiv

  16. [21]

    Gauge/gravity duality: Foundations and applications ; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2015

    Ammon, M.; Erdmenger, J. Gauge/gravity duality: Foundations and applications ; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2015

    2015

  17. [22]

    Holographic Quantum Matter; MIT Press, 2018

    Hartnoll, S.A.; Lucas, A.; Sachdev, S. Holographic Quantum Matter; MIT Press, 2018

    2018

  18. [23]

    Holographic Duality in Condensed Matter Physics ; Cambridge University Press, 2015

    Zaanen, J.; Liu, Y.; Sun, Y.; Schalm, K. Holographic Duality in Condensed Matter Physics ; Cambridge University Press, 2015

    2015

  19. [24]

    Non-hermitian holography

    Areán, D.; Landsteiner, K.; Salazar Landea, I. Non-hermitian holography. SciPost Phys. 2020, 9, 032, [arXiv:hep-th/1912.06647]. https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.9.3.032

    2020 arXiv

  20. [28]

    The gravity dual to a quantum critical point with spontaneous symmetry breaking

    Gubser, S.S.; Rocha, F.D. The gravity dual to a quantum critical point with spontaneous symmetry breaking. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 102, 061601, [arXiv:hep-th/0807.1737]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.061601. Version November 28, 2024 submitted to Entropy 20 of 20

    2009 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Breaking an Abelian gauge symmetry near a black hole horizon

    Gubser, S.S. Breaking an Abelian gauge symmetry near a black hole horizon. Phys. Rev. D 2008, 78, 065034, [arXiv:hep- th/0801.2977]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.78.065034

    2008 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Building a Holographic Superconductor

    Hartnoll, S.A.; Herzog, C.P .; Horowitz, G.T. Building a Holographic Superconductor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 101, 031601, [arXiv:hep-th/0803.3295]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.031601

    2008 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Numerical solution of gravitational dynamics in asymptotically anti-de Sitter spacetimes.JHEP 2014, 07, 086, [arXiv:hep-th/1309.1439]

    Chesler, P .M.; Yaffe, L.G. Numerical solution of gravitational dynamics in asymptotically anti-de Sitter spacetimes.JHEP 2014, 07, 086, [arXiv:hep-th/1309.1439]. https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2014)086

    2014 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Renormalization group flows from holography supersymmetry and a c theorem

    Freedman, D.Z.; Gubser, S.S.; Pilch, K.; Warner, N.P . Renormalization group flows from holography supersymmetry and a c theorem. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 1999, 3, 363–417, [hep-th/9904017]. https://doi.org/10.4310/ATMP .1999.v3.n2.a7

    1999 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Seeing a c-theorem with holography

    Myers, R.C.; Sinha, A. Seeing a c-theorem with holography. Phys. Rev. D 2010, 82, 046006, [arXiv:hep-th/1006.1263]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.82.046006

    2010 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Holographic c-theorems in arbitrary dimensions

    Myers, R.C.; Sinha, A. Holographic c-theorems in arbitrary dimensions. JHEP 2011, 01, 125, [arXiv:hep-th/1011.5819]. https: //doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2011)125

    2011 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Ground states of holographic superconductors

    Gubser, S.S.; Nellore, A. Ground states of holographic superconductors. Phys. Rev. D 2009, 80, 105007, [arXiv:hep-th/0908.1972]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.80.105007

    2009 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Spawning Rings of Exceptional Points out of Dirac Cones

    Zhen, B.; Hsu, C.W.; Igarashi, Y.; Lu, L.; Kaminer, I.; Pick, A.; Chua, S.L.; Joannopoulos, J.; Soljaˇ ci´ c, M. Spawning Rings of Exceptional Points out of Dirac Cones. Nature 2015, 525, 354. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14889

    2015 doi

  29. [37]

    Parity-time-symmetric quantum critical phenomena

    Ashida, Y.; Furukawa, S.; Ueda, M. Parity-time-symmetric quantum critical phenomena. Nature Communications 2017, 8. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15791

    2017 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.