Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Cross-modal Information Flow in Multimodal Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.18620 v2 pith:736BMABI submitted 2024-11-27 cs.AI cs.CLcs.CV

classification cs.AIcs.CLcs.CV
keywords informationlanguagemodelsvisuallinguisticmllmsmultimodalquestion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The recent advancements in auto-regressive multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have demonstrated promising progress for vision-language tasks. While there exists a variety of studies investigating the processing of linguistic information within large language models, little is currently known about the inner working mechanism of MLLMs and how linguistic and visual information interact within these models. In this study, we aim to fill this gap by examining the information flow between different modalities -- language and vision -- in MLLMs, focusing on visual question answering. Specifically, given an image-question pair as input, we investigate where in the model and how the visual and linguistic information are combined to generate the final prediction. Conducting experiments with a series of models from the LLaVA series, we find that there are two distinct stages in the process of integration of the two modalities. In the lower layers, the model first transfers the more general visual features of the whole image into the representations of (linguistic) question tokens. In the middle layers, it once again transfers visual information about specific objects relevant to the question to the respective token positions of the question. Finally, in the higher layers, the resulting multimodal representation is propagated to the last position of the input sequence for the final prediction. Overall, our findings provide a new and comprehensive perspective on the spatial and functional aspects of image and language processing in the MLLMs, thereby facilitating future research into multimodal information localization and editing. Our code and collected dataset are released here: https://github.com/FightingFighting/cross-modal-information-flow-in-MLLM.git.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Self-Aware Safety Augmentation: Leveraging Internal Semantic Understanding to Enhance Safety in Vision-Language Models

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A tuning-free method that projects middle-layer semantic representations back onto early safety layers, improving vision-language model safety with minimal utility loss.

  2. Not All Tokens and Heads Are Equally Important: Dual-Level Attention Intervention for Hallucination Mitigation

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A dual-level attention intervention that boosts salient visual-token attention and suppresses text/system attention during decoding reduces hallucination rates in LLaVA, MiniGPT-4, and mPLUG-Owl2 on POPE and CHAIR.

  3. Interpreting Social Bias in LVLMs via Information Flow Analysis and Multi-Round Dialogue Evaluation

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A fairness score built from token-level attribution and pruned multi-round dialogues links LLaVA models' reliance on sensitive image regions to demographic accuracy gaps.

  4. Language-Specific Layer Matters: Efficient Multilingual Enhancement for Large Vision-Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Selective fine-tuning of language-specific shallow layers identified by neuron activation analysis improves multilingual vision-language performance with only 14% of parameters tuned.

  5. GreedyPrune: Retenting Critical Visual Token Set for Large Vision Language Models

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A training-free token pruning method that combines cosine-similarity saliency with greedy redundancy removal to preserve accuracy at high compression ratios.

Pith tools