Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

MILLION: A General Multi-Objective Framework with Controllable Risk for Portfolio Management

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.03038 v1 pith:4BGSCBLK submitted 2024-12-04 q-fin.PM cs.AIcs.LG

classification q-fin.PMcs.AIcs.LG
keywords portfolioriskreturninterpolationcontrolframeworklevelmanagement
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Portfolio management is an important yet challenging task in AI for FinTech, which aims to allocate investors' budgets among different assets to balance the risk and return of an investment. In this study, we propose a general Multi-objectIve framework with controLLable rIsk for pOrtfolio maNagement (MILLION), which consists of two main phases, i.e., return-related maximization and risk control. Specifically, in the return-related maximization phase, we introduce two auxiliary objectives, i.e., return rate prediction, and return rate ranking, combined with portfolio optimization to remit the overfitting problem and improve the generalization of the trained model to future markets. Subsequently, in the risk control phase, we propose two methods, i.e., portfolio interpolation and portfolio improvement, to achieve fine-grained risk control and fast risk adaption to a user-specified risk level. For the portfolio interpolation method, we theoretically prove that the risk can be perfectly controlled if the to-be-set risk level is in a proper interval. In addition, we also show that the return rate of the adjusted portfolio after portfolio interpolation is no less than that of the min-variance optimization, as long as the model in the reward maximization phase is effective. Furthermore, the portfolio improvement method can achieve greater return rates while keeping the same risk level compared to portfolio interpolation. Extensive experiments are conducted on three real-world datasets. The results demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed framework.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Large-scale portfolio optimization with variational neural annealing

    cond-mat.dis-nn 2025-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    VNA produces Sharpe-ratio-competitive portfolios on indices up to 2,008 assets, but the claimed speed advantage and universal finite-size scaling are not robustly supported.

  2. Multi-objective Portfolio Optimization Via Gradient Descent

    cs.CE 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A TensorFlow gradient descent framework optimizes portfolios over multiple objectives and constraints, matching exact solvers in simple cases and flexibly handling non-convex multi-objective problems.

Pith tools