REVIEW 2 cited by
Personalizing Multimodal Large Language Models for Image Captioning: An Experimental Analysis
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The task of image captioning demands an algorithm to generate natural language descriptions of visual inputs. Recent advancements have seen a convergence between image captioning research and the development of Large Language Models (LLMs) and Multimodal LLMs -- like GPT-4V and Gemini -- which extend the capabilities of text-only LLMs to multiple modalities. This paper investigates whether Multimodal LLMs can supplant traditional image captioning networks by evaluating their performance on various image description benchmarks. We explore both the zero-shot capabilities of these models and their adaptability to different semantic domains through fine-tuning methods, including prompt learning, prefix tuning, and low-rank adaptation. Our results demonstrate that while Multimodal LLMs achieve impressive zero-shot performance, fine-tuning for specific domains while maintaining their generalization capabilities intact remains challenging. We discuss the implications of these findings for future research in image captioning and the development of more adaptable Multimodal LLMs.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
VF-Eval: Evaluating Multimodal LLMs for Generating Feedback on AIGC Videos
A new benchmark, VF-Eval, measures how well multimodal LLMs check, detect, and reason about errors in AI-generated videos, and shows frontier models remain far below human performance.
-
R-Genie: Reasoning-Guided Generative Image Editing
R-Genie couples a multimodal LLM with a discrete diffusion model to perform image edits that require commonsense reasoning, and introduces a 1,070-triple benchmark called REditBench.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.