REVIEW 3 cited by
System Test Case Design from Requirements Specifications: Insights and Challenges of Using ChatGPT
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
System Test Case Design from Requirements Specifications: Insights and Challenges of Using ChatGPT
read the original abstract
System testing is essential in any software development project to ensure that the final products meet the requirements. Creating comprehensive test cases for system testing from requirements is often challenging and time-consuming. This paper explores the effectiveness of using Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate test case designs from Software Requirements Specification (SRS) documents. In this study, we collected the SRS documents of five software engineering projects containing functional and non-functional requirements, which were implemented, tested, and delivered by respective developer teams. For generating test case designs, we used ChatGPT-4o Turbo model. We employed prompt-chaining, starting with an initial context-setting prompt, followed by prompts to generate test cases for each use case. We assessed the quality of the generated test case designs through feedback from the same developer teams as mentioned above. Our experiments show that about 87 percent of the generated test cases were valid, with the remaining 13 percent either not applicable or redundant. Notably, 15 percent of the valid test cases were previously not considered by developers in their testing. We also tasked ChatGPT with identifying redundant test cases, which were subsequently validated by the respective developers to identify false positives and to uncover any redundant test cases that may have been missed by the developers themselves. This study highlights the potential of leveraging LLMs for test generation from the Requirements Specification document and also for assisting developers in quickly identifying and addressing redundancies, ultimately improving test suite quality and efficiency of the testing procedure.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Uncovering Business Logic Bugs via Semantics-Driven Unit Test Generation
SeGa extracts business semantics from requirements to generate unit tests that detect 22-25 more real-world business logic bugs than prior LLM-based methods in industrial Go projects.
-
LLMCFG-TGen: Using LLM-Generated Control Flow Graphs to Automatically Create Test Cases from Use Cases
An LLM-generated control-flow graph intermediate representation improves completeness and reduces redundancy in test cases generated from natural-language use cases.
-
A Blueprint for AI-Driven Software Quality: Integrating LLMs with Established Standards
Survey mapping LLM applications in software quality assurance to established standards including ISO/IEC 12207, ISO 25010, CMMI, and TMM, with case studies, challenges, and future directions.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.