Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

LeakAgent: RL-based Red-teaming Agent for LLM Privacy Leakage

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.05734 v2 pith:RPCVHXTS submitted 2024-12-07 cs.CR cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CRcs.AIcs.LG
keywords leakagentleakagepromptssystemdataextractiontrainingadversarial
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent studies have discovered that large language models (LLM) may be ``fooled'' to output private information, including training data, system prompts, and personally identifiable information, under carefully crafted adversarial prompts. Existing red-teaming approaches for privacy leakage either rely on manual efforts or focus solely on system prompt extraction, making them ineffective for severe risks of training data leakage. We propose LeakAgent, a novel black-box red-teaming framework for LLM privacy leakage. Our framework trains an open-source LLM through reinforcement learning as the attack agent to generate adversarial prompts for both training data extraction and system prompt extraction. To achieve this, we propose a novel reward function to provide effective and fine-grained rewards and design novel mechanisms to balance exploration and exploitation during learning and enhance the diversity of adversarial prompts. Through extensive evaluations, we first show that LeakAgent significantly outperforms existing rule-based approaches in training data extraction and automated methods in system prompt leakage. We also demonstrate the effectiveness of LeakAgent in extracting system prompts from real-world applications in OpenAI's GPT Store. We further demonstrate LeakAgent's effectiveness in evading the existing guardrail defense and its helpfulness in enabling better safety alignment. Finally, we validate our customized designs through a detailed ablation study. We release our code here https://github.com/rucnyz/LeakAgent.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. DPAgent-in-the-Middle: Agentic Defense and Repair Against AI-Groomed Deceptive Patterns

    cs.CR 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    DPAgent is an agentic framework that detects 90.98% of AI-groomed deceptive samples and repairs 77% of deceptive interfaces while exploring 80% of pattern types with 10% of baseline page visits.

  2. Security Considerations for Multi-agent Systems

    cs.CR 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    No existing AI security framework covers a majority of the 193 identified multi-agent system threats in any category, with OWASP Agentic Security Initiative achieving the highest overall coverage at 65.3%.

  3. Prompt Governance? On Governing Technologies Governed by Natural Language

    cs.CY 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    Literature on system prompts for AI shows fragmented and contradictory claims that complicate policy efforts to use them as reliable governance mechanisms.

Pith tools