Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Heuristic-Induced Multimodal Risk Distribution Jailbreak Attack for Multimodal Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.05934 v3 pith:MIKHFJIM submitted 2024-12-08 cs.CR cs.AI

Heuristic-Induced Multimodal Risk Distribution Jailbreak Attack for Multimodal Large Language Models

classification cs.CR cs.AI
keywords mllmsjailbreakmultimodalattackdistributionheuristic-inducedriskstrategy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

With the rapid advancement of multimodal large language models (MLLMs), concerns regarding their security have increasingly captured the attention of both academia and industry. Although MLLMs are vulnerable to jailbreak attacks, designing effective jailbreak attacks poses unique challenges, especially given the highly constrained adversarial capabilities in real-world deployment scenarios. Previous works concentrate risks into a single modality, resulting in limited jailbreak performance. In this paper, we propose a heuristic-induced multimodal risk distribution jailbreak attack method, called HIMRD, which is black-box and consists of two elements: multimodal risk distribution strategy and heuristic-induced search strategy. The multimodal risk distribution strategy is used to distribute harmful semantics into multiple modalities to effectively circumvent the single-modality protection mechanisms of MLLMs. The heuristic-induced search strategy identifies two types of prompts: the understanding-enhancing prompt, which helps MLLMs reconstruct the malicious prompt, and the inducing prompt, which increases the likelihood of affirmative outputs over refusals, enabling a successful jailbreak attack. HIMRD achieves an average attack success rate (ASR) of 90% across seven open-source MLLMs and an average ASR of around 68% in three closed-source MLLMs. HIMRD reveals cross-modal security vulnerabilities in current MLLMs and underscores the imperative for developing defensive strategies to mitigate such emerging risks. Code is available at https://github.com/MaTengSYSU/HIMRD-jailbreak.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. On Surjectivity of Neural Networks: Can you elicit any behavior from your model?

    cs.LG 2025-08 conditional novelty 7.0

    Pre-LayerNorm transformers and linear attention are almost always surjective, so any target output has an input that produces it in the continuous embedding space.

  2. Benign Inputs, Harmful Outputs: Cross-Modal Jailbreaking via Distributed Semantic Recomposition

    cs.CR 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    DSR decomposes harmful intents into benign textual and visual primitives that MLLMs fuse into harmful outputs, achieving high attack success with low input toxicity.

  3. PRISM: Programmatic Reasoning with Image Sequence Manipulation for LVLM Jailbreaking

    cs.CR 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    PRISM decomposes harmful instructions into benign visual gadgets and directs LVLMs via prompts to compose them through reasoning into harmful outputs, achieving ASR over 0.90 on SafeBench.

  4. One Shot Dominance: Knowledge Poisoning Attack on Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems

    cs.CR 2025-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    AuthChain poisons a single document to achieve high-success attacks on RAG systems for multi-hop queries across six LLMs while evading defenses.

  5. Empowering Multimodal LLMs with External Tools: A Comprehensive Survey

    cs.CV 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    A survey paper maps how external tools are used to augment multimodal large language models across data, tasks, evaluation, and future directions.