Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 55 references

A single geometry from an all-genus expansion in quantum gravity

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In JT gravity at β ~ e^{2S0/3}, the all-genus path integral is reproduced by a single deformed disk with a nonlocal cusp interaction, −λQ³.

desk verdict A clever and mostly sound reformulation of the JT genus sum as a gas of cusps and a one-disk Q^3 deformation, but the central match is fixed by an unproven renormalization of the cubic operator. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.08799 v1 pith:RVWLDZTC submitted 2024-12-11 hep-th gr-qcmath-phmath.MP

Sergio Hernández-Cuenca , Nico Valdes-Meller , Wayne Wei-en Weng This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thgr-qcmath-phmath.MP
keywords JTgravitygenusexpansiontopologicalresummationcuspgasWeil-PeterssonvolumesnonlocaldilatondeformationAirylimitintersectiontheory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to show that JT gravity at inverse temperatures β ~ $e^{{2S0/3}}$—a regime where every genus contributes at the same order and a conventional saddle-point expansion around a fixed topology seems unavailable—still admits an effective single-geometry description. The authors recast the infinite genus sum as a gas of indistinguishable cusp triplets on a disk, then exponentiate that gas into a nonlocal deformation of the dilaton potential, $S = S_{\mathrm{JT}} - \lambda Q^3$ with $Q = q\int e^{-\alpha\phi}$ and $\alpha = 2\pi$. From this deformed disk they recover the known leading partition function and argue that higher-order corrections follow from higher cusp interactions $Q^k$ with fixed couplings. If the construction holds, it is a concrete case of a topological expansion resuming into one geometry, with implications for how spacetime could emerge from strongly quantum gravitational superpositions.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing device is the cusp-gas identity: as the geodesic boundary length $b$ of a genus-$g$ surface grows, its moduli-space volume degenerates to the sphere volume with $3g$ cusps divided by $24^g g!$, namely $V_{g,1}(b) \simeq (1/(24^g g!))\,\mathring{V}_{3g}(b)$. Feeding this into the trumpet integral turns the genus sum into a grand canonical gas of indistinguishable cusp triplets with fugacity $\lambda = e^{-2S_0}/24$; the $1/g!$ factors make the cusps indistinguishable, and exponentiating the gas produces the nonlocal disk action $S = S_{\mathrm{JT}} - \lambda Q^3$, where $Q = q\int_M e^{-\alpha\phi}$ with $\alpha = 2\pi$ inserts a cusp. The geometric content is carried by trivalent ribbon graphs: at large $b$, genus cycles pinch off into three cusps, and the combinatorics of tree graphs with leaves counts the cusp volumes. A saddle-point-plus-one-loop evaluation of this disk action, with the cusp coupling renormalized to $q = \alpha$, yields the resummed partition function.

What would settle it

Compute $\langle Z(\beta)\rangle$ at $\beta \sim e^{2S_0/3}$ directly by summing the genus expansion with the trumpet integral and known Weil–Petersson volumes, and compare it order by order in $e^{-2S_0/3}$ with the deformed-disk saddle including the predicted couplings $\lambda_4, \lambda_5, \lambda_6, \ldots$; the first mismatch in any coefficient would show the claimed all-orders equivalence fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central discovery is that the topological expansion of JT gravity at low temperatures need not be summed genus by genus: at $\beta \sim e^{2S_0/3}$ it is equivalent to an effective theory evaluated on a single disk. The equivalence is mediated by the large-boundary identity between genus-$g$ Weil–Petersson volumes and sphere volumes with $3g$ cusps, which turns every genus into three zero-size boundaries; summing over unlabeled cusps exponentiates to the nonlocal action $S = S_{\mathrm{JT}} - \lambda Q^3$, with $\lambda = e^{-2S_0}/24$ and $Q = q\int_M e^{-2\pi\phi}$. Saddle-point evaluation of this disk reproduces $\langle Z(\beta)\rangle = e^{S_0}/\sqrt{2\pi\beta^3}\,\exp(\beta^3 e^{-2S_0}/24)$, and the paper shows that subleading inverse-temperature corrections are captured by a hierarchy of higher-order cusp couplings determined order by order from the genus data. The same single-disk description also matches multi-boundary probe correlators and yields a spectral-edge shift that matches the beginning of the eigenvalue-instanton regime.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the deformed disk path integral, despite being nonlocal through $Q^3$, can be evaluated by the standard saddle-point-plus-one-loop scheme used for single-cusp deformations, with the cusp coupling renormalized to $q = \alpha$; if this quantization scheme does not apply to the nonlocal interaction, the claimed equivalence between the deformed disk and the all-genus sum is not established.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The all-genus expansion of JT gravity at $\beta \sim e^{2S_0/3}$ can be replaced by a single disk path integral, so an effective spacetime description survives in a regime where no single topology is semiclassically dominant.
  • The known leading-order result $\langle Z(\beta)\rangle = e^{S_0}(2\pi\beta^3)^{-1/2}\exp(\beta^3 e^{-2S_0}/24)$ follows from one deformed disk saddle, not from summing an infinite number of genus saddles.
  • Subleading corrections are controlled by a finite list of higher cusp interactions; for example $\ell=1$ fixes $\lambda_5 = (21/10)\pi^2\lambda^2$, and $\ell=3$ adds an $O(\lambda^2)$ renormalization of the leading $Q^3$ coupling.
  • Probe-boundary correlators $\langle Z(\beta)Z(\gamma_1)\cdots Z(\gamma_m)\rangle$ with $\gamma_i \ll \beta$ agree between the genus sum and the disk description to leading order, via the string equation.
  • The deformed disk predicts a downward shift of the spectral edge $E_0 = -(1/8)\beta^2 e^{-2S_0}$, matching the first sign of the eigenvalue-instanton that dominates at stronger coupling $\beta \sim e^{S_0}$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: the genus-to-cusps degeneration may also organize the late-time spectral form factor, whose plateau involves an all-genus sum that has so far resisted a single-geometry description.
  • Inference: the renormalization $q = \alpha$ is fixed by comparison with known cusp data rather than derived from first principles, so an independent quantization of the nonlocal $Q^3$ term would test whether the effective action is emergent or partly constructed.
  • Inference: the same mechanism could be probed in $(2,p)$-minimal strings or JT supergravity, where a finite-$p$ analog of the cusp-volume identity would predict a single-disk resummation at a $p$-dependent temperature scale.
  • Inference: the zero-size cusps are natural seeds for the new boundaries of the strong-coupling eigenvalue-instanton regime, suggesting the intermediate-coupling disk is the weak-coupling limit of an open/closed dual description.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies JT gravity with one asymptotic boundary at inverse temperature β ~ e^{2S0/3}, where the genus expansion of ⟨Z(β)⟩ is not suppressed. Using the large-geodesic-boundary form of Weil–Petersson volumes, the authors rewrite each genus contribution as a cusp partition function on a sphere with one large and 3g zero-length boundaries (eq. (12)). This turns the genus sum into a grand-canonical gas of cusp triplets, which is then exponentiated into a disk path integral with action S = S_JT − λ Q^3, where Q = q ∫ e^{−αφ} and α = 2π (eq. (19)). A saddle-point evaluation with the renormalization q = α yields eq. (25), matching the known leading-order result (eq. (9)). The paper also analyzes subleading corrections by introducing higher-order cusp interactions and derives new cusp Weil–Petersson volumes in Appendices B and C.

Significance. If the quantization step can be supplied, the result is a surprisingly clean example of a topological expansion resumming into a single effective geometry in a regime where all genera contribute at equal order. The large-b identity (12) and the cusp-gas reformulation (15) are well founded and elegant, and the explicit matching of the leading-order partition function is nontrivial. The paper also provides useful calculations of cusp intersection numbers and a combinatorial characterization of cusp ribbon graphs. However, the significance is conditional: the central derivation relies on an unproven renormalization prescription for a nonlocal cubic operator, and the 'complete reproduction' claim goes beyond what is demonstrated.

major comments (3)
  1. [Effective description, eqs. (17)–(25)] The step from a single-defect operator to a cubic nonlocal interaction is not derived. The references [37,38] fix the renormalization of one insertion Q = q ∫ e^{-αφ} to q = α, but eq. (19) contains Q^3, and the paper asserts that the nonlocality sourced by Q^3 is 'sufficiently tame' and that the same quantization applies. In the saddle evaluation, the three factors of Q are evaluated on the same background, so the exponent in eq. (25) is proportional to q^3/α^3; if the renormalized cubic coupling does not equal α^3, the known result (9) is not reproduced. The paper needs either a derivation of the cubic renormalization or an explicit statement that the coefficient λ is fixed by matching, which would recast eq. (19) as a low-energy effective action rather than a derivation.
  2. [Effective description, eq. (25)] The matching to eq. (9) also requires the prefactor 1/√(2πβ^3). The paper states that the Schwarzian mode and SL(2,R) zero modes give Z1-loop = 1/√(2πβ^3) 'as in standard JT,' but the deformed action (19) changes the saddle-point background and the quadratic fluctuation operator. The determinant has not been computed, and a nontrivial one-loop correction would alter the claimed match. Since the prefactor is part of the leading-order claim, this should be justified or computed.
  3. [Discussion and Appendix C] The claim that the full genus sum is 'completely reproduced' by the effective theory in eq. (19) is not supported. Appendix C explicitly shows that subleading corrections in 1/β require additional interactions λ_4 Q^4, λ_5 Q^5, ... and an O(λ^2) correction to λ_3, so eq. (19) alone does not capture the full genus sum beyond ℓ = 0. In addition, the all-orders reconstruction formula (C4) is verified only for ℓ ≤ 3; the H_k(g) polynomials at higher ℓ are obtained by iterating a pattern, not by proof. The 'complete reproduction' claim should be restricted to leading order, or the all-orders statement should be proved.
minor comments (5)
  1. [References, [44]] The reference [44] contains placeholder question marks: '[6 ? ? ?, 7]' should be corrected to the intended citations.
  2. [Eq. (23)] Equation (23) omits the q-dependence from the variation of Q^3; if q is not yet set to α, the equation should contain q^3, and the substitution q = α should be made explicit at that point.
  3. [Abstract] The phrase 'doubly nonperturbative physics' is not defined; please clarify what is meant by 'doubly' in this context.
  4. [Appendix B] The ancillary file containing Q_ℓ up to ℓ = 28 is mentioned but not described; a short description or checksum would help readers verify the claimed data.
  5. [Eq. (24)] The statement that the e^{-3α r_h} factor is suppressed by e^{-2S0/3} is made but not shown; include a short estimate using eq. (23).

Circularity Check

3 steps flagged · score 5.0 of 10

The deformed-disk effective theory is built by exponentiating the cusp-gas form of the known genus sum, and its renormalized coupling q=alpha is fixed by comparison with that same sum; the advertised match is therefore a fitted reconstruction rather than an independent prediction.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 'Effective description', after eq. (25)]
    "Given this saddle-point analysis, one must ask how renormalization modifies eq. (25). The scheme advocated for by [37] involves comparison with the sum over cusps in eq. (15). Alternatively, [38] proposed performing the computation in a general (2, p) minimal model, and then taking the p → ∞ for JT gravity. Both prescriptions agree, and they result in q = α (to leading order as α → 2π)."

    The saddle-point result (25) contains exp(q^3 β^3 e^{-2S0}/(24 α^3)). Setting q = α makes this equal to eq. (9), the known leading all-genus answer. But eq. (15) — the object used in the 'comparison with the sum over cusps' — is precisely the cusp-gas form of that same all-genus answer, obtained from the same genus data. The renormalized coupling is therefore chosen to reproduce the target quantity rather than determined by an independent quantization of the nonlocal Q^3 interaction. The subsequent claim that the disk theory 'precisely matches the full genus expansion' is a restatement of this choice, not an independent prediction.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Appendix C, 'Subleading cusp interactions', around eqs. (C1)-(C13)]
    "These can be worked out by reconstructing the genus WP volumes Vg,1(b) in eq. (A1) in terms of the cusp WP volumes ˚Vn(b) in eq. (B1) order by order in b."

    The effective couplings λ_k are fixed order by order by requiring the cusp theory to reproduce the known genus Weil-Petersson volumes V_{g,1}, whose intersection numbers are quoted from [23] in Appendix A. The main text says that ℓ = 0 'fixes' λ3 = λ and that ℓ = 1 'imposes' λ5 = 21/5 π^2 λ^2; the list in (C13) is the result of this matching. Thus the claimed reproduction of subleading corrections is a fit to the target data, not a prediction. The later statement that the genus sum 'can be completely reproduced on a single disk topology' is true by construction but carries no independent confirmatory content.

1 more flagged steps
  1. renaming known result [Section 'Effective description', eq. (19)]
    "Using eq. (18) in eq. (15), the sum over g exponentiates into a deformation of the JT dilaton potential, ⟨Z(β)⟩ ℓ= 0= Z Disk Dg Dϕ e−S, S ≡ SJT − λQ3 (19)."

    Equation (18) defines the n-cusp disk insertion so that it equals the cusp partition function, and eq. (15) fixes the fugacity λ = e^{-2S0}/24 from the known genus sum. Exponentiating this cusp gas builds the deformed disk action out of the very quantity it is claimed to explain. The equality between the deformed disk partition function and the all-genus sum is therefore imposed by definition; the geometric 'resummation' is an exact reformulation of the input genus data. Presenting this as a derivation of the effective description is a renaming of the known result rather than an independent derivation.

full rationale

The paper contains genuine non-circular mathematics: the large-b identity (12) between genus and cusp Weil-Petersson volumes, the cusp-volume computations in Appendix B, and the formal rewriting of the genus sum as a grand-canonical cusp gas are real results that do not presuppose the target partition function. However, the load-bearing comparison between the effective disk theory and the known all-genus result is not an independent check. The renormalized coupling q = α is fixed by comparing the saddle-point answer with the cusp sum in eq. (15), i.e., with the very genus data the theory was constructed to match; and the subleading couplings λ_k in Appendix C are imposed order by order by reconstructing the known V_{g,1} from cusp volumes. Thus the leading and subleading 'reproductions' reduce by construction to the input genus data. No separate self-citation violation is scored: [38] includes a present author but is corroborated by the independent prescription of [37], and [29] is used only for a consistency check of the edge shift. The correct description is partial circularity: the formal single-disk rewriting is valid, but its advertised predictive match is fixed by matching, earning a 5 rather than a higher score.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard intersection theory (Mirzakhani, Kontsevich, string equation), on the domain assumption that Q insertions represent cusps, and on the renormalization scheme of [36-38]. No new physical entities are introduced. The only parameters, lambda and q, are fixed by matching to known results, not derived from a more fundamental theory.

free parameters (3)
  • lambda (Q^3 coupling) = e^{-2S0}/24
    Fixing the gas-of-cusps sum (15) to reproduce the known l=0 genus sum (9) determines lambda; this is a matching condition, not an independent prediction.
  • q (defect operator normalization) = alpha = 2pi (leading order as alpha tends to 2pi)
    Fixed by the renormalization prescriptions of [37,38] to match WP volumes; the paper does not derive q from a first-principles disk computation.
  • Subleading cusp couplings lambda_k (k >= 4) = lambda4 = 9/20 (2pi^2)^2 lambda^2, lambda5 = 21/10 (2pi^2) lambda^2, lambda6 = -52/35 (2pi^2)^3 lambda^3, etc. (eq. C13)
    Determined order by order by matching the effective theory to the known genus expansion F_l; they are fitted, not predicted.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Mirzakhani's theorem on Weil-Petersson volumes and their polynomial structure (eq. 5).
    Used throughout; the paper relies on this for the genus expansion (eqs. 3-6) and for the cusp volume recursion in App. B.
  • standard math Kontsevich's ribbon graph decomposition of moduli space in the large-boundary (Airy) limit.
    Used in the geometric interpretation (fig. 2, App. D) and in the identity (12).
  • domain assumption The identification of the defect operator Q = q integral e^{-alpha phi} with conical defects or cusps in the JT path integral (eq. 18), inherited from [36-39].
    The paper assumes this representation and fixes q by matching; this is the bridge between the gas-of-cusps reformulation and the effective action.
  • domain assumption The quantization or renormalization scheme of [37,38] applies to the nonlocal Q^3 deformation, so that a naive saddle-point evaluation plus parameter renormalization gives the correct disk path integral.
    Invoked in the Effective description section ('our theory remains amenable to the same quantization as in [36]'); if false, the match between the deformed theory and the genus sum is not established.
  • standard math String equation for intersection numbers, used to argue equality of multi-boundary correlators (eq. 30).
    Used in the Section 'Subleading effects and other observables' to remove extra punctures.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A single geometry from an all-genus expansion in quantum gravity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RVWLDZTC

@misc{pith2026241208799,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A single geometry from an all-genus expansion in quantum gravity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RVWLDZTC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.08799}
}
read the original abstract

We report on an instance in quantum gravity where a topological expansion resums into an effective description on a single geometry. The original theory whose gravitational path integral we study is JT quantum gravity with one asymptotic boundary at nonperturbatively low temperatures. The effective theory we derive is a deformation of JT gravity by a highly quantum and nonlocal interaction for the dilaton, evaluated only on a disk topology. This emergent description addresses a strongly quantum gravitational regime where all genera contribute at the same order, successfully capturing the doubly nonperturbative physics of the original theory.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.08799 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic replacement of genus by cusps. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Unique ribbon graph for M1,1 and its reinterpretation as a diagram for M0,4 with three cusps. The idea is as follows: there exists a single type of ribbon geometry in M1,1, shown in fig. 2a. This is repre￾sented by a graph in fig. 2b, where a diamond indicates orientation reversal capturing the non-planarity of the ribbon. The graph may be understood as the b → ∞ limit of the ribbon, in which the geometry degenerate… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages

  1. [44]

    For some non-topological perspectives on the issue of lo- cality in quantum gravity, see e.g., [6 ? ? ?, 7]

    work page

  2. [1]

    S. W. Hawking, The Unpredictability of Quantum Grav- ity, Commun. Math. Phys. 87, 395 (1982)

    work page 1982

  3. [2]

    S. R. Coleman, Black holes as red herrings: Topological fluctuations and the loss of quantum coherence, Nucl. Phys. B 307, 867 (1988)

    work page 1988

  4. [3]

    S. B. Giddings and A. Strominger, Loss of incoherence and determination of coupling constants in quantum gravity, Nucl. Phys. B 307, 854 (1988)

    work page 1988

  5. [4]

    S. B. Giddings and G. J. Turiaci, Wormhole calculus, replicas, and entropies, JHEP 09, 194, arXiv:2004.02900 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2004

  6. [5]

    Statistical coupling constants from hidden sector entanglement

    V. Balasubramanian, J. J. Heckman, E. Lipeles, and A. P. Turner, Statistical Coupling Constants from Hidden Sector Entanglement, Phys. Rev. D 103, 066024 (2021), arXiv:2012.09182 [hep-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2021

  7. [6]

    Nonlocality in Quantum Gravity and the Breakdown of Effective Field Theory

    N. Vald´ es-Meller, Nonlocality in quantum gravity and the breakdown of effective field theory, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 30, 2142016 (2021), arXiv:2105.12201 [hep-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2021

  8. [7]

    Hern´ andez-Cuenca, Wormholes and Factoriza- tion in Exact Effective Theory, preprint (2024), arXiv:2404.10035 [hep-th]

    S. Hern´ andez-Cuenca, Wormholes and Factoriza- tion in Exact Effective Theory, preprint (2024), arXiv:2404.10035 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2024

Show all 55 references
  1. [8]

    P. Saad, S. H. Shenker, and D. Stanford, JT gravity as a matrix integral, preprint (2019), arXiv:1903.11115 [hep- th]

    2019 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Stanford and E

    D. Stanford and E. Witten, JT gravity and the ensembles of random matrix theory, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 24, 1475 (2020), arXiv:1907.03363 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Marolf and H

    D. Marolf and H. Maxfield, Transcending the ensem- ble: baby universes, spacetime wormholes, and the order and disorder of black hole information, JHEP 08, 044, arXiv:2002.08950 [hep-th]

    2002 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Belin and J

    A. Belin and J. de Boer, Random statistics of OPE co- efficients and Euclidean wormholes, Class. Quant. Grav. 38, 164001 (2021), arXiv:2006.05499 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Maloney and E

    A. Maloney and E. Witten, Averaging over Narain mod- uli space, JHEP 10, 187, arXiv:2006.04855 [hep-th]

    2006 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Afkhami-Jeddi, H

    N. Afkhami-Jeddi, H. Cohn, T. Hartman, and A. Tajdini, Free partition functions and an averaged holographic du- ality, JHEP 01, 130, arXiv:2006.04839 [hep-th]

    2006 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Cotler and K

    J. Cotler and K. Jensen, AdS 3 gravity and random CFT, JHEP 04, 033, arXiv:2006.08648 [hep-th]

    2006 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Collier and A

    S. Collier and A. Maloney, Wormholes and spectral statistics in the Narain ensemble, JHEP 03, 004, arXiv:2106.12760 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  9. [16]

    Chandra, S

    J. Chandra, S. Collier, T. Hartman, and A. Maloney, Semiclassical 3D gravity as an average of large-c CFTs, JHEP 12, 069, arXiv:2203.06511 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  10. [17]

    Polchinski, String theory

    J. Polchinski, String theory. Vol. 2: Superstring theory and beyond, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2007)

    2007

  11. [18]

    M. B. Green and P. Vanhove, Duality and higher deriva- tive terms in M theory, JHEP 01, 093, arXiv:hep- th/0510027

  12. [19]

    Drukker and D

    N. Drukker and D. J. Gross, An Exact prediction of N=4 SUSYM theory for string theory, J. Math. Phys.42, 2896 (2001), arXiv:hep-th/0010274

    2001 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Drukker and B

    N. Drukker and B. Fiol, All-genus calculation of Wil- son loops using D-branes, JHEP 02, 010, arXiv:hep- th/0501109

  14. [21]

    Jackiw, Lower Dimensional Gravity, Nucl

    R. Jackiw, Lower Dimensional Gravity, Nucl. Phys. B 252, 343 (1985)

    1985

  15. [22]

    Teitelboim, Gravitation and Hamiltonian Structure in Two Space-Time Dimensions, Phys

    C. Teitelboim, Gravitation and Hamiltonian Structure in Two Space-Time Dimensions, Phys. Lett. B 126, 41 (1983)

    1983

  16. [23]

    Okuyama and K

    K. Okuyama and K. Sakai, JT gravity, KdV equa- tions and macroscopic loop operators, JHEP 01, 156, arXiv:1911.01659 [hep-th]

    1911 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Okuyama and K

    K. Okuyama and K. Sakai, Multi-boundary correlators in JT gravity, JHEP 08, 126, arXiv:2004.07555 [hep-th]

    2004 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Engelhardt, S

    N. Engelhardt, S. Fischetti, and A. Maloney, Free en- ergy from replica wormholes, Phys. Rev. D 103, 046021 (2021), arXiv:2007.07444 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  19. [26]

    C. V. Johnson, Low Energy Thermodynamics of JT Gravity and Supergravity, preprint (2020), arXiv:2008.13120 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  20. [27]

    C. V. Johnson, On the Quenched Free Energy of JT Gravity and Supergravity, preprint (2021), arXiv:2104.02733 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Chandrasekaran, N

    V. Chandrasekaran, N. Engelhardt, S. Fischetti, and S. Hern´ andez-Cuenca, A tale of two saddles, JHEP 11, 110, arXiv:2207.09472 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  22. [29]

    Hern´ andez-Cuenca, Entropy and Spectrum of Near- 10 Extremal Black Holes: semiclassical brane solu- tions to non-perturbative problems, preprint (2024), arXiv:2407.20321 [hep-th]

    S. Hern´ andez-Cuenca, Entropy and Spectrum of Near- 10 Extremal Black Holes: semiclassical brane solu- tions to non-perturbative problems, preprint (2024), arXiv:2407.20321 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Blommaert, J

    A. Blommaert, J. Kruthoff, and S. Yao, An inte- grable road to a perturbative plateau, JHEP 04, 048, arXiv:2208.13795 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  24. [31]

    P. Saad, D. Stanford, Z. Yang, and S. Yao, A conver- gent genus expansion for the plateau, JHEP 09, 033, arXiv:2210.11565 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  25. [32]

    Okuyama and K

    K. Okuyama and K. Sakai, Spectral form factor in the τ -scaling limit, JHEP 04, 123, arXiv:2301.04773 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  26. [33]

    Mirzakhani, Weil-Petersson volumes and intersection theory on the moduli space of curves, J

    M. Mirzakhani, Weil-Petersson volumes and intersection theory on the moduli space of curves, J. Am. Math. Soc. 20, 1 (2007)

    2007

  27. [34]

    Do, A tourist’s guide to intersection theory on moduli spaces of curves, The Australian Mathematical Society Gazette 35 (2008)

    N. Do, A tourist’s guide to intersection theory on moduli spaces of curves, The Australian Mathematical Society Gazette 35 (2008)

    2008

  28. [35]

    Kontsevich, Intersection theory on the moduli space of curves and the matrix Airy function, Commun

    M. Kontsevich, Intersection theory on the moduli space of curves and the matrix Airy function, Commun. Math. Phys. 147, 1 (1992)

    1992

  29. [36]

    Witten, Deformations of JT Gravity and Phase Tran- sitions, preprint (2020), arXiv:2006.03494 [hep-th]

    E. Witten, Deformations of JT Gravity and Phase Tran- sitions, preprint (2020), arXiv:2006.03494 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Witten, Matrix Models and Deformations of JT Grav- ity, Proc

    E. Witten, Matrix Models and Deformations of JT Grav- ity, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 476, 20200582 (2020), arXiv:2006.13414 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  31. [38]

    G. J. Turiaci, M. Usatyuk, and W. W. Weng, 2D dilaton- gravity, deformations of the minimal string, and ma- trix models, Class. Quant. Grav. 38, 204001 (2021), arXiv:2011.06038 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  32. [39]

    Lin and M

    G. Lin and M. Usatyuk, Revisiting the second order for- malism of JT gravity, preprint (2023), arXiv:2310.16081 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  33. [40]

    Hence diffeomorphism invariance can be used to turn a general solution of the form ϕ = ar + b into simply ϕ(r) = r

    More specifically, the metric is invariant under r → r/a − b, A → A/a2, and τ → aτ . Hence diffeomorphism invariance can be used to turn a general solution of the form ϕ = ar + b into simply ϕ(r) = r

  34. [41]

    However, by inserting a second large boundary we are once again deforming the background of the theory in the same way we did when we inserted one large boundary

    One could also try to consider ⟨Z(β1)Z(β2)⟩ for β1 and β2 both nonperturbatively large. However, by inserting a second large boundary we are once again deforming the background of the theory in the same way we did when we inserted one large boundary. This may also lead to an e...

  35. [42]

    Witten, Two-dimensional gravity and intersection the- ory on moduli space, Surveys Diff

    E. Witten, Two-dimensional gravity and intersection the- ory on moduli space, Surveys Diff. Geom. 1, 243 (1991)

    1991

  36. [43]

    See also [30, 31] for recent discussions of Kontsevich’s ribbon graphs in the context of JT gravity

  37. [45]

    Okuyama and K

    K. Okuyama and K. Sakai, FZZT branes in JT gravity and topological gravity, JHEP 09, 191, arXiv:2108.03876 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  38. [46]

    McNamara and C

    J. McNamara and C. Vafa, Baby Universes, Holography, and the Swampland, preprint (2020), arXiv:2004.06738 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  39. [47]

    B. Post, J. van der Heijden, and E. Verlinde, A universe field theory for JT gravity, JHEP 05, 118, arXiv:2201.08859 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  40. [48]

    C. V. Johnson, Jackiw-Teitelboim supergravity, minimal strings, and matrix models, Phys. Rev. D 103, 046012 (2021), arXiv:2005.01893 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  41. [49]

    T. G. Mertens and G. J. Turiaci, Liouville quantum gravity – holography, JT and matrices, JHEP 01, 073, arXiv:2006.07072 [hep-th]

    2006 arXiv

  42. [50]

    A. A. Belavin and A. B. Zamolodchikov, On correla- tion numbers in 2d minimal gravity and matrix models, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 42, 304004 (2009)

    2009

  43. [51]

    Collier, L

    S. Collier, L. Eberhardt, B. M¨ uhlmann, and V. A. Ro- driguez, The Virasoro minimal string, SciPost Phys. 16, 057 (2024), arXiv:2309.10846 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Bershadsky, S

    M. Bershadsky, S. Cecotti, H. Ooguri, and C. Vafa, Kodaira-Spencer theory of gravity and exact results for quantum string amplitudes, Commun. Math. Phys. 165, 311 (1994), arXiv:hep-th/9309140

    1994 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Do and P

    N. Do and P. Norbury, Weil–petersson volumes and cone surfaces, Geometriae Dedicata 141, 93 (2009)

    2009

  46. [54]

    Mirzakhani’s general recursion relation [33], which for g = 0 requires not only V0,n−1 but also the pairs V0,n1 and V0,n2 for all n1 + n2 = n + 1

    Cf. Mirzakhani’s general recursion relation [33], which for g = 0 requires not only V0,n−1 but also the pairs V0,n1 and V0,n2 for all n1 + n2 = n + 1

  47. [55]

    Do, Moduli spaces of hyperbolic surfaces and their weil-petersson volumes (2011), arXiv:1103.4674 [math.GT]

    N. Do, Moduli spaces of hyperbolic surfaces and their weil-petersson volumes (2011), arXiv:1103.4674 [math.GT]

    2011 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.