Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 6 minor 2 cited by

Spin-Transfer Torque in Altermagnets with Magnetic Textures

T0 review · 1 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper predicts that textured d-wave altermagnets carry spin-splitter spin-transfer torques which induce domain-wall precession and an anisotropic skyrmion Hall effect, distinguishing altermagnets from ordinary antiferromagnets.

desk verdict A clean, symmetry-based prediction paper that adds a new spin-splitter torque for textured altermagnets; the torque form itself is the main assumption, but the collective-coordinate analysis and micromagnetics are solid. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.11274 v2 pith:4HRU62Y7 submitted 2024-12-15 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Hamed Vakili , Edward Schwartz , Alexey A. Kovalev This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords altermagnetismspin-transfertorquespin-splitterdomainwallprecessionskyrmionHalleffectd-wavesymmetrymagnetictexturesantiferromagneticspintronics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper predicts a new family of current-induced torques in altermagnets—collinear antiferromagnets whose spin-split bands have d-wave symmetry—beyond the standard spin-transfer torque. The added spin-splitter torques depend on the current direction relative to the crystal axes, and the paper works out their consequences for two canonical magnetic textures. Domain walls precess under the adiabatic spin-splitter torque, which slows their motion and makes it anisotropic; skyrmions experience a Magnus force, producing an anisotropic skyrmion Hall effect and potentially much faster motion than ordinary antiferromagnets allow. If correct, these signatures would identify altermagnets in textured samples and open a distinct route for current-controlled magnetic devices.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing objects are the torque expressions in Eqs. (3)-(4), which generalize the standard spin-transfer torque to a $d$-wave altermagnet by adding the spin-splitter terms proportional to $u'$. The form is fixed by symmetry for a system without spin-orbit coupling: the standard terms follow from separate rotations of spin and coordinate space plus sublattice symmetry, and the spin-splitter terms follow from the $d$-wave symmetry group. Dynamics are carried by a Lagrangian for the staggered field $n$, with the adiabatic spin-splitter torque entering through the Wess-Zumino vector potential $A_{wz}$, and by a Rayleigh function for the nonadiabatic torques. For skyrmions, a Thiele equation with mass, gyro, dissipative, and altermagnetic tensors yields the velocity formulas; the force $F = 4\pi\hat z\times u'_0 + \beta\hat D\cdot u_0$ is the origin of the Magnus-force Hall effect.

What would settle it

Measure the current-driven velocity of a domain wall in a thin-film $d$-wave altermagnet as a function of current direction relative to the crystal axes. The paper predicts that along the spin-splitter axis, where $|\tilde u'|=u$, the wall precesses and its velocity is suppressed relative to other directions, with a non-linear $v(u)$ whenever $\alpha\neq\beta$; observing no directional anisotropy or no precession-induced slowdown would falsify the central claim. A complementary test looks at skyrmions: the transverse velocity component should grow with $P'/P$ and change with current direction in the $d$-wave pattern, whereas ordinary antiferromagnetic skyrmions driven by spin-transfer torque alone show no such Hall motion.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central claim is that in a textured $d$-wave altermagnet the spin-transfer torque is not just the antiferromagnetic version of the standard torque, but acquires two new spin-splitter terms. The torque on the Néel field is $$\tau_n = -(u\cdot\partial)n + \$\beta$' n\times[u'\cdot\partial]n,$$ the torque on the magnetization is $$\tau_m = \$\beta$ n\times(u\cdot\partial)n - [u'\cdot\partial]n,$$ where $u$ is the charge drift velocity and $u' = -\frac{g\mu_B P'}{2eN_s}(\hat\sigma_z\cdot j)$ encodes the spin-splitter effect, with $\hat\sigma_z$ reflecting the $d$-wave symmetry of the altermagnet. The paper argues that the adiabatic spin-splitter term acts like an effective vector potential in the texture's Lagrangian, producing domain-wall precession and, for skyrmions, a Magnus force $4\pi\hat z\times u'_0$. These terms make current-driven dynamics anisotropic and give altermagnets a skyrmion Hall effect that compensated antiferromagnets lack.

Load-bearing premise

The spin-splitter torque is assumed, on symmetry grounds, to act locally with strength fixed only by the current and the d-wave axes, independent of the local magnetic texture, so a texture-dependent spin-splitter current would alter or remove the predicted precession and Hall effects.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Domain walls in $d$-wave altermagnets precess under the adiabatic spin-splitter torque, so their current-driven speed saturates and becomes anisotropic: slowest motion occurs when the current lies along the spin-splitter axis, where $|\tilde u'|=u$.
  • The anisotropic wall response reflects the $d$-wave symmetry, so rotating the current direction with respect to the crystal axes changes the wall velocity with the corresponding angular periodicity.
  • Skyrmions experience a Magnus force from the adiabatic spin-splitter torque, producing a skyrmion Hall effect even in a compensated altermagnet where the total topological charge of the two sublattices cancels.
  • The spin-splitter torque can drive skyrmions much faster than nonadiabatic spin-transfer torque alone when the damping and nonadiabatic parameters are comparable.
  • These signatures distinguish altermagnets from ordinary antiferromagnets, where current-driven domain walls do not precess and skyrmions driven by spin-transfer torque show no Hall effect.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct test is suggested by the paper's symmetry argument: measuring the angular dependence of the skyrmion Hall angle in a thin film of a candidate $d$-wave altermagnet should show a pattern set by the crystal axes, with the transverse velocity proportional to the spin-splitter polarization $P'$.
  • If the predicted precession-limited domain-wall speed is real, then current-driven racetrack or logic devices could be directional: the same current density would move a wall quickly along one crystal axis and slowly along another, a built-in anisotropy that could be exploited as a switch.
  • The paper neglects the nonadiabatic spin-splitter correction $\beta'$ in the skyrmion analysis and keeps only terms with small $\Lambda_0\beta'$ for domain walls; at stronger altermagnetic coupling or larger $\beta'$, texture-dependent corrections to the torque form could become visible and serve as a higher-order test of the symmetry classification.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a phenomenological extension of the Zhang-Li spin-transfer torque to textured d-wave altermagnets. Equations (3)-(4) add spin-splitter adiabatic and nonadiabatic terms proportional to u'. The authors insert these torques into a Lagrangian for the Néel field, derive domain-wall collective-coordinate equations, and obtain closed-form velocity and precession formulas in Eqs. (14)-(15). For skyrmions, they use a Thiele equation with a force arising from the spin-splitter adiabatic torque, Eqs. (17)-(18), and derive velocity formulas in Eqs. (19)-(21). Micromagnetic simulations with two coupled layers in mumax3 are used to support the analytic results. The central predictions are that the spin-splitter torque slows domain-wall motion anisotropically via precession and produces an anisotropic skyrmion Hall effect.

Significance. If the assumed torque form is correct, this is a timely and significant contribution to altermagnet spintronics. It identifies experimentally distinguishable signatures of altermagnetism in magnetic textures and supplies simple analytic formulas that can be used for comparison with future experiments. The analytic formulas are internally consistent: the domain-wall velocity reduces to v = u in the alpha = beta limit, and the skyrmion Thiele equation reproduces the expected beta/alpha u response when u' = 0. The micromagnetics confirms the collective-coordinate approximations. A limitation is that the micromagnetics implements the same torque model as the analytics, so the agreement is an internal consistency check rather than an independent test of the spin-splitter torque form.

major comments (1)
  1. [Model and methods, Eqs. (3)-(4)] The spin-splitter torques are written as local drift terms with u' independent of the local texture, and the text states this form is established by the symmetry method of Ref. [34] for a uniform state. All subsequent predictions (domain-wall precession, anisotropic velocity, skyrmion Magnus force) depend on the absence of texture-dependent corrections to u'. If the spin-splitter spin-current polarization follows the local Néel vector, the divergence of the spin current can produce terms such as (sigma_z . j)(n . d)n or n[(sigma_z . j) . d]n that are the same gradient order as the drift term, and a symmetry analysis restricted to the uniform state does not by itself rule them out. Please provide either a microscopic derivation from the two-sublattice Hamiltonian in the Supplemental Material or a complete symmetry classification of all terms first order in current and gradients for a d-wave altermagnet with a textured Néel field, and state explicitly why the additional texture-dependent terms vanish. Without this, the effective u' entering Eqs. (14)-(15) and (18) could be texture-dependent, and the predicted precession and skyrmion Hall effects could be modified or even vanish after averaging over the texture.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Domain wall dynamics, Eq. (11)] The spherical parametrization n = (sin theta cos phi, cos theta sin phi, cos theta) is not normalized; the second component should be sin theta sin phi. Please correct this typo.
  2. [Model and methods, Eqs. (3)-(4)] The notation (sigma_z . j) is not defined rigorously: sigma_z is a 2x2 Pauli matrix rather than a vector, so it is unclear how this expression yields a real-space vector u'. Please clarify the convention.
  3. [Skyrmion dynamics, after Eq. (17)] The sentence 'Our Eq. (26) differs from the result obtained in Ref. [40]' refers to an equation number that appears only in the Supplemental Material; please cross-reference the main-text Eq. (17) or the Supplemental Eq. (26) explicitly.
  4. [Fig. 2(a)] The caption says the adiabatic spin-transfer torque is turned off while the horizontal axis is labeled by the charge drift velocity u; since u' is defined through the same charge current, please specify whether P = 0 is assumed and what quantity is actually plotted on the horizontal axis.
  5. [Skyrmion dynamics, after Eq. (18)] The statement that the nonadiabatic spin-splitter torque can be disregarded by setting beta' = 0 'as its effect is small' is asserted without an estimate or parameter condition; please provide a quantitative argument, as beta' could be comparable to beta.
  6. [Skyrmion dynamics, Eq. (17)] The skyrmion mass tensor M is introduced in Eq. (17) but never defined; if it is not needed for the steady-state solutions, please define it or omit it from the Thiele equation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the spin-splitter torque is an explicit symmetry-based input, and the micromagnetics comparison checks the collective-coordinate reductions of the same model rather than providing independent validation.

full rationale

The paper derives texture dynamics from an assumed spin-splitter torque form (Eqs. 3-4), stated as established by symmetry following Ref. [34]; it is not obtained from the target dynamics. Parameters (P, P', beta, beta', material constants) are taken from external literature, notably Ref. [16], and none are fitted to the domain-wall or skyrmion velocities presented as predictions. The analytical results (Eqs. 14-15 and 18-21) are consequences of inserting this torque model into the Lagrangian and Rayleigh function; the d-wave anisotropy and the skyrmion-Hall force inherit the assumed form u' proportional to sigma_z·j, which is a model-to-consequence derivation, not a circular reduction, because the dynamics are not used to define the torque. The micromagnetic implementation in the Supplemental Material (Eqs. 24-25) deliberately reproduces Eqs. (3)-(4) by setting u=(u1+u2)/2 and u'=(u1-u2)/2; therefore the stated 'good agreement' between analytics and mumax3 is a self-consistency check of the collective-coordinate/Thiele approximations, not an independent empirical test. This weakens external validation but is not circular reasoning. Self-citations (Refs. 28, 32, 33, 38) concern standard Wess-Zumino and thermoelectric-spin-transfer formalism and previously known domain-wall precession behavior; none is load-bearing for the central altermagnet claim, and no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The ledger is clean: no free parameter is fitted to the predicted effects; material constants (A, B, Hex, Han, Ns) come from Ref [16]. Main model assumptions are the d-wave free energy representation, the symmetry-based spin-splitter torque form, the slow-magnetization elimination, the domain wall ansatz, and the smallness of beta' terms.

free parameters (2)
  • P'/P (spin-splitter torque efficiency) = not determined (presented for u' = u and u = 2u')
    Controls the strength of the new spin-splitter torques; the paper does not fix it, presenting results for different ratios. Effects (domain wall precession, skyrmion Hall) scale with it.
  • beta' (nonadiabatic spin-splitter coefficient) = beta' = beta in simulations; neglected analytically (Lambda_0 beta' << 1)
    The nonadiabatic spin-splitter torque magnitude is not derived; assumed equal to beta in micromagnetics and dropped in analytic domain wall expressions.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math The Lagrangian L = d integral (N_s/gamma) m . (d_t n x n) d^2 r - E in Eq. (2) describes the conservative dynamics of the two-sublattice magnetic texture.
    Standard order-parameter Lagrangian for antiferromagnets, with Wess-Zumino terms cited to Refs [35-38].
  • domain assumption Free energy Eq. (1) with the altermagnetic exchange term B(d_x m . d_x n - d_y m . d_y n) correctly describes d-wave altermagnets in the long-wavelength limit.
    Taken from Ref [16]; the predicted d-wave anisotropy is a direct consequence of this term. The SM tests a RuO2-like lattice and finds no difference for the parameters used.
  • domain assumption Spin-transfer torque forms in Eqs. (3)-(4), including spin-splitter terms with u' = -(g mu_B P'/(2e N_s))(sigma_z . j), are the correct generalization of Zhang-Li torque for textured altermagnets.
    Established by symmetry following Ref [34]; not derived microscopically. All subsequent results (precession, Hall effect) depend on this postulate.
  • domain assumption In the large Hex limit, the magnetization m is enslaved via Eq. (5) to leading order in 1/Hex.
    Standard for antiferromagnet dynamics; used to obtain the reduced Lagrangian (6).
  • domain assumption The domain wall ansatz Eqs. (11)-(12) with collective coordinates X, Phi, b, Delta captures the relevant dynamics.
    Analytic domain wall results (14)-(15) rely on this ansatz; micromagnetics validates it for v < c.
  • domain assumption The nonadiabatic spin-splitter torque contribution proportional to Lambda_0 beta' is small and can be dropped.
    Stated in the domain wall section: 'the terms containing the product Lambda_0 beta' ... small as long as Lambda_0 beta' << 1'.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spin-Transfer Torque in Altermagnets with Magnetic Textures." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4HRU62Y7

@misc{pith2026241211274,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spin-Transfer Torque in Altermagnets with Magnetic Textures},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4HRU62Y7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.11274}
}
abstract

We predict the existence of anisotropic spin-transfer torque effect in textured altermagnets. To this end, we generalize the Zhang-Li torque to incorporate the symmetry associated with prototypical $d$-wave altermagnets and identify the spin-splitter adiabatic and nonadiabatic torques. Applying our results to domain wall dynamics induced by spin-transfer torque, we find that, in certain regimes, the spin-splitter adiabatic torque can induce domain wall precession, significantly slowing down domain wall motion. The response of the domain wall also becomes anisotropic, reflecting the $d$-wave symmetry of the altermagnet. Furthermore, we observe that the spin-splitter adiabatic torque modifies skyrmion dynamics, inducing anisotropic skyrmion Hall effect. The above phenomena can serve as a hallmark of altermagnetism in textured magnets, distinguishing it from the behavior of ordinary antiferromagnets.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.11274 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematics of the spin-transfer and spin-splitter ef [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Out-of-plane magnetization of: (a) A stationary [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Current-induced dynamics of a domain wall. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Components of the skyrmion velocity, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Quantum transport theory for unconventional magnets: Interplay of altermagnetism and p-wave magnetism with superconductivity

    cond-mat.supr-con 2024-12 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A symmetry-based quantum transport theory for unconventional magnets, unified with superconductivity, yields testable predictions for spin-polarized currents, proximity-induced magnetization, and spin-galvanic effects.

  2. Transport theory and spin-transfer physics in d-wave altermagnets

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The authors derive from a microscopic t-J model a mesoscale transport theory in which charge currents exert transverse spin-transfer torques, enabling current-driven domain-wall motion in d-wave altermagnets.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [16]

    Gomonay, V

    O. Gomonay, V. P. Kravchuk, R. Jaeschke-Ubiergo, K. V. Yershov, T. Jungwirth, L. ˇSmejkal, J. v. d. Brink, and J. Sinova, Structure, control, and dynamics of altermag- netic textures, npj Spintronics 2, 35 (2024)

    work page 2024

  2. [34]

    K. M. D. Hals and A. Brataas, Phenomenology of current-induced spin-orbit torques, Phys. Rev. B 88, 085423 (2013)

    work page 2013

  3. [1]

    L.-D. Yuan, Z. Wang, J.-W. Luo, E. I. Rashba, and A. Zunger, Giant momentum-dependent spin splitting in centrosymmetric low- z antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 102, 014422 (2020)

    2020

  4. [2]

    ˇSmejkal, R

    L. ˇSmejkal, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova, Crystal time-reversal symmetry breaking and spontaneous hall effect in collinear antiferromagnets, Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz8809 (2020)

    2020

  5. [3]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond conven- tional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry, Phys. Rev. X 12, 031042 (2022)

    2022

  6. [4]

    Mazin (The PRX Editors), Editorial: Altermagnetism—a new punch line of fundamental magnetism, Phys

    I. Mazin (The PRX Editors), Editorial: Altermagnetism—a new punch line of fundamental magnetism, Phys. Rev. X 12, 040002 (2022)

    2022

  7. [5]

    Y. Guo, H. Liu, O. Janson, I. C. Fulga, J. van den Brink, and J. I. Facio, Spin-split collinear antiferromag- nets: A large-scale ab-initio study, Mater. Today Phys. 32, 100991 (2023)

    2023

  8. [6]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging re- search landscape of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X 12, 040501 (2022)

    2022

Show all 51 references
  1. [7]

    Manchon, J

    A. Manchon, J. ˇZelezn´ y, I. M. Miron, T. Jungwirth, J. Sinova, A. Thiaville, K. Garello, and P. Gambardella, Current-induced spin-orbit torques in ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 035004 (2019)

    2019

  2. [8]

    M. Naka, S. Hayami, H. Kusunose, Y. Yanagi, Y. Mo- tome, and H. Seo, Spin current generation in organic an- tiferromagnets, Nat. Commun. 10, 4305 (2019)

    2019

  3. [9]

    Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, L.ˇSmejkal, K

    R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, L.ˇSmejkal, K. V´ yborn´ y, Y. Ya- hagi, J. Sinova, T. c. v. Jungwirth, and J. ˇZelezn´ y, Efficient electrical spin splitter based on nonrelativis- tic collinear antiferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 127701 (2021)

    2021

  4. [10]

    H. Bai, L. Han, X. Y. Feng, Y. J. Zhou, R. X. Su, Q. Wang, L. Y. Liao, W. X. Zhu, X. Z. Chen, F. Pan, X. L. Fan, and C. Song, Observation of spin splitting torque in a collinear antiferromagnet ruo 2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 197202 (2022)

    2022

  5. [11]

    Karube, T

    S. Karube, T. Tanaka, D. Sugawara, N. Kadoguchi, M. Kohda, and J. Nitta, Observation of spin-splitter torque in collinear antiferromagnetic ruo 2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 137201 (2022)

    2022

  6. [12]

    Z. Feng, X. Zhou, L. ˇSmejkal, L. Wu, Z. Zhu, H. Guo, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, X. Wang, H. Yan, P. Qin, X. Zhang, H. Wu, H. Chen, Z. Meng, L. Liu, Z. Xia, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, and Z. Liu, An anomalous hall effect in altermagnetic ruthenium dioxide, Nat. Electron. 5, 735–...

    2022

  7. [13]

    T. Sato, S. Haddad, I. C. Fulga, F. F. Assaad, and J. van den Brink, Altermagnetic anomalous hall effect emerging from electronic correlations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 086503 (2024)

    2024

  8. [14]

    ˇSmejkal, A

    L. ˇSmejkal, A. Marmodoro, K.-H. Ahn, R. Gonz´ alez- Hern´ andez, I. Turek, S. Mankovsky, H. Ebert, S. W. D’Souza, O. c. v. ˇSipr, J. Sinova, and T. c. v. Jungwirth, Chiral magnons in altermagnetic ruo 2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 256703 (2023)

    2023

  9. [15]

    Gohlke, A

    M. Gohlke, A. Corticelli, R. Moessner, P. A. McClarty, and A. Mook, Spurious symmetry enhancement in lin- ear spin wave theory and interaction-induced topology in magnons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 186702 (2023)

    2023

  10. [17]

    Zhang and Z

    S. Zhang and Z. Li, Roles of nonequilibrium conduction electrons on the magnetization dynamics of ferromag- nets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 127204 (2004)

    2004

  11. [18]

    Y. Xu, S. Wang, and K. Xia, Spin-transfer torques in antiferromagnetic metals from first principles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 226602 (2008)

    2008

  12. [19]

    A. C. Swaving and R. A. Duine, Current-induced torques in continuous antiferromagnetic textures, Phys. Rev. B 83, 054428 (2011)

    2011

  13. [20]

    K. M. D. Hals, Y. Tserkovnyak, and A. Brataas, Phe- nomenology of current-induced dynamics in antiferro- magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 107206 (2011)

    2011

  14. [21]

    Yamane, J

    Y. Yamane, J. Ieda, and J. Sinova, Spin-transfer torques in antiferromagnetic textures: Efficiency and quantifica- tion method, Phys. Rev. B 94, 054409 (2016). 6

    2016

  15. [22]

    Barker and O

    J. Barker and O. A. Tretiakov, Static and dynamical properties of antiferromagnetic skyrmions in the pres- ence of applied current and temperature, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 147203 (2016)

    2016

  16. [23]

    Salimath, F

    A. Salimath, F. Zhuo, R. Tomasello, G. Finocchio, and A. Manchon, Controlling the deformation of antiferro- magnetic skyrmions in the high-velocity regime, Phys. Rev. B 101, 024429 (2020)

    2020

  17. [24]

    Zhang, Y

    X. Zhang, Y. Zhou, and M. Ezawa, Antiferromagnetic skyrmion: Stability, creation and manipulation, Sci. Rep. 6, 24795 (2016)

    2016

  18. [25]

    E. G. Tveten, A. Qaiumzadeh, O. A. Tretiakov, and A. Brataas, Staggered dynamics in antiferromagnets by collective coordinates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 127208 (2013)

    2013

  19. [26]

    Gomonay, T

    O. Gomonay, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova, High antifer- romagnetic domain wall velocity induced by n´ eel spin- orbit torques, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 017202 (2016)

    2016

  20. [27]

    Selzer, U

    S. Selzer, U. Atxitia, U. Ritzmann, D. Hinzke, and U. Nowak, Inertia-free thermally driven domain-wall mo- tion in antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 107201 (2016)

    2016

  21. [28]

    K. D. Belashchenko, O. Tchernyshyov, A. A. Kovalev, and O. A. Tretiakov, Magnetoelectric domain wall dy- namics and its implications for magnetoelectric memory, Appl. Phys. Lett. 108, 132403 (2016)

    2016

  22. [29]

    Kim, D.-H

    D.-H. Kim, D.-H. Kim, K.-J. Kim, K.-W. Moon, S. Yang, K.-J. Lee, and S. K. Kim, The dynamics of a domain wall in ferrimagnets driven by spin-transfer torque, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 514, 167237 (2020)

    2020

  23. [30]

    Slonczewski, Current-driven excitation of magnetic multilayers, J

    J. Slonczewski, Current-driven excitation of magnetic multilayers, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 159, L1–L7 (1996)

    1996

  24. [31]

    Berger, Emission of spin waves by a magnetic mul- tilayer traversed by a current, Phys

    L. Berger, Emission of spin waves by a magnetic mul- tilayer traversed by a current, Phys. Rev. B 54, 9353 (1996)

    1996

  25. [32]

    A. A. Kovalev, A. Brataas, and G. E. W. Bauer, Spin transfer in diffusive ferromagnet–normal metal systems with spin-flip scattering, Phys. Rev. B 66, 224424 (2002)

    2002

  26. [33]

    A. A. Kovalev and Y. Tserkovnyak, Thermoelectric spin transfer in textured magnets, Phys. Rev. B 80, 100408 (2009)

    2009

  27. [35]

    P. A. M. Dirac, The theory of magnetic poles, Phys. Rev. 74, 817 (1948)

    1948

  28. [36]

    Dasgupta and O

    S. Dasgupta and O. Tchernyshyov, Energy-momentum tensor of a ferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 98, 224401 (2018)

    2018

  29. [37]

    K. Y. Guslienko, G. R. Aranda, and J. M. Gonzalez, Topological gauge field in nanomagnets: Spin-wave exci- tations over a slowly moving magnetization background, Phys. Rev. B 81, 014414 (2010)

    2010

  30. [38]

    A. A. Kovalev and Y. Tserkovnyak, Thermomagnonic spin transfer and peltier effects in insulating magnets, EPL (Europhysics Letters) 97, 67002 (2012)

    2012

  31. [39]

    Vansteenkiste, J

    A. Vansteenkiste, J. Leliaert, M. Dvornik, M. Helsen, F. Garcia-Sanchez, and B. Van Waeyenberge, The design and verification of mumax3, AIP Adv. 4, 107133 (2014)

    2014

  32. [40]

    Z. Jin, Z. Zeng, Y. Cao, and P. Yan, Skyrmion hall effect in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 196701 (2024)

    2024

  33. [41]

    See Supplemental Material [URL will be inserted by pub- lisher] for more details

  34. [42]

    Kosevich, B

    A. Kosevich, B. Ivanov, and A. Kovalev, Magnetic soli- tons, Phys. Rep. 194, 117–238 (1990)

    1990

  35. [43]

    B¨ uttner, I

    F. B¨ uttner, I. Lemesh, and G. S. D. Beach, Theory of iso- lated magnetic skyrmions: From fundamentals to room temperature applications, Sci. Rep. 8, 4464 (2018)

    2018

  36. [44]

    X. S. Wang, H. Y. Yuan, and X. R. Wang, A theory on skyrmion size, Commun. Phys. 1, 31 (2018)

    2018

  37. [45]

    Braun, Fluctuations and instabilities of ferromag- netic domain-wall pairs in an external magnetic field, Phys

    H.-B. Braun, Fluctuations and instabilities of ferromag- netic domain-wall pairs in an external magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B 50, 16485 (1994)

    1994

  38. [46]

    E. A. Tremsina and G. S. D. Beach, Atomistic simula- tions of distortion-limited high-speed dynamics of an- tiferromagnetic skyrmions, Phys. Rev. B 106, L220402 (2022)

    2022

  39. [47]

    Komineas and N

    S. Komineas and N. Papanicolaou, Traveling skyrmions in chiral antiferromagnets, SciPost Phys. 8, 086 (2020)

    2020

  40. [48]

    Sampaio, V

    J. Sampaio, V. Cros, S. Rohart, A. Thiaville, and A. Fert, Nucleation, stability and current-induced motion of iso- lated magnetic skyrmions in nanostructures, Nat. Nan- otechnol. 8, 839–844 (2013)

    2013

  41. [49]

    Ohki and M

    Y. Ohki and M. Mochizuki, Fundamental theory of current-induced motion of magnetic skyrmions, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 37, 023003 (2024)

    2024

  42. [50]

    Zarzuela, R

    R. Zarzuela, R. Jaeschke-Ubiergo, O. Gomonay, L. ˇSmejkal, and J. Sinova, Transport theory and spin-transfer physics in d-wave altermagnets (2024), arXiv:2412.13763 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    2024 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Kokkeler, I

    T. Kokkeler, I. Tokatly, and F. S. Bergeret, Quantum transport theory for unconventional magnets; interplay of altermagnetism and p-wave magnetism with supercon- ductivity (2025), arXiv:2412.10236 [cond-mat.supr-con]. 7 Supplemental Material for Spin-transfer torque in alterma...

    2025 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.