Distributed satellite information networks: Architecture, enabling technologies, and trends

Chiya Zhang; Dixian Zhao; Dongming Wang; Jianhao Huang; Jian Jiao; Ke Zhang; Liang Xu; Liujun Hu; Li You; Na Deng

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Distributed satellite information networks: Architecture, enabling technologies, and trends

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that distributed satellite information networks, built as cohesive clusters of small satellites flying close together as a virtual satellite, will break the information silos among communication, navigation and remote…

desk verdict A competent, encyclopedic survey that maps distributed satellite information networks well but asserts its central 'inevitable trend' claim without a feasibility budget; worth refereeing as a survey, not as a research contribution. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.12587 v2 pith:YOWP47P7 submitted 2024-12-17 cs.IT cs.AIcs.NImath.IT

Qinyu Zhang , Liang Xu , Jianhao Huang , Tao Yang , Jian Jiao , Ye Wang , Yao Shi , Chiya Zhang

show 18 more authors

Xingjian Zhang Ke Zhang Yupeng Gong Na Deng Nan Zhao Zhen Gao Shujun Han Xiaodong Xu Li You Dongming Wang Shan Jiang Dixian Zhao Nan Zhang Liujun Hu Xiongwen He Yonghui Li Xiqi Gao Xiaohu You

This is my paper · ORCID

classification cs.ITcs.AIcs.NImath.IT

keywords Distributedsatelliteinformationnetworkscohesiveclusteredsatellitessystemregenerativenetworkresourcevirtualizationsemanticcommunicationsdirectsatellite-to-devicecloud-nativeMIMOreconfigurableformationflying

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review argues that the next step for space networks is to stop treating each satellite as an isolated, single-purpose machine. Instead, dozens to pairs of small satellites would fly close together as a cohesive clustered satellites (CCS) system, pooling their antennas, computing, and sensing into one reconfigurable virtual satellite. The paper lays out three architectures for that vision — distributed regenerative networking, distributed satellite computing, and reconfigurable formation flying — and then surveys the physical-layer and network-layer technologies needed to make them work, from cloud-native distributed MIMO and OTFS waveforms to grant-free access and inter-satellite routing. The payoff, if the vision holds, is a single open network that can switch between communication, navigation, remote sensing and computing tasks on demand, instead of today's fragmented, mission-specific constellations. A fair reading of the paper's contribution is a systematic case that this cluster-based architecture is the direction 6G satellite integration should take.

What carries the argument

The central object is the cohesive clustered satellites (CCS) system: a group of dozens down to pairs of homogeneous or heterogeneous satellites flying in close proximity so that, through orbital control, self-organizing networking and payload synergy, they behave as one virtual satellite. Three architectural mechanisms carry the argument: (1) the distributed regenerative satellite network, which uses the CU-DU functional split from cellular radio access networks so that a central unit can coordinate several satellite distributed units; (2) the distributed satellite computing network, a cloud-edge-local architecture in which GEO nodes act as cloud, MEO/LEO clusters as edge, and user terminals as local computing; and (3) reconfigurable satellite formation flying, where leader-follower, behavior-based, or virtual-structure control plus event-triggered updates let the cluster change its geometry for different missions. The physical-layer workhorse is cloud-native distributed MIMO: multiple satellites act as a cell-free massive MIMO array with distributed baseband processing, which requires the synchronization and calibration of phase, frequency and time across nodes — identified by the paper as the hardest constraint.

What would settle it

An orbital or high-fidelity ground test in which two or more small satellites attempt coherent downlink beamforming to a stationary terminal would settle the question: if the received signal does not show the predicted array gain under realistic oscillator drift and Doppler, or if the synchronization overhead exceeds the beamforming gain, the central promise of the CCS architecture fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a distributed satellite information network, exemplified by the cohesive clustered satellites system, can bridge the information gaps that currently separate communication, navigation and remote sensing satellite systems, and can grow into a unified, open information network that delivers resilient space information services. The authors argue that this is possible by moving from transparent single-satellite payloads to distributed regenerative payloads, by giving the cluster a cloud-native computing fabric that pools the heterogeneous resources of small satellites, and by letting the cluster reconfigure its formation on demand. They further claim that the physical and link layers can support this vision through channel-aware estimation, cloud-native distributed MIMO cooperation, OTFS waveforms, distributed phased arrays, grant-free massive access, NOMA/RSMA multicast, erasure-coded transmission, high-speed inter-satellite optical links and distributed routing, all coordinated by cross-layer mobility, resource and security management. In the authors' framing, the CCS system is not one more constellation type but the architectural basis for a single, resilient space information infrastructure.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that many small satellites can synchronize their clocks, frequencies and phases tightly enough to act as a single antenna, and that they can carry enough onboard computing for cloud-style processing; the paper itself flags both as extremely challenging and not yet demonstrated on real payloads.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Clusters can provide service continuity: when one satellite fails or degrades, the rest of the cluster takes over the coverage, and several small satellites can synthesize the aperture of one large antenna for a ground user.
A single reconfigurable cluster could serve different missions over its lifetime — communication, Earth observation, navigation, or computing — by switching formation geometry rather than launching a new satellite.
Cloud-native distributed MIMO with a CU-DU split shifts heavy processing from individual satellites to a shared cloud brain, reducing the mass, power and cost of each satellite node.
Grant-free NOMA with OTFS can cut access latency and handle the large Doppler shifts and differential delays of LEO links, making massive IoT access from space practical.
Combining erasure coding, Age-of-Information-aware congestion control and distributed routing can keep end-to-end transmission fresh and reliable even though satellite links have long, variable delays.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If terminal-assisted phase synchronization matures, coherent downlink beamforming among cluster nodes may not require inter-satellite over-the-air calibration links; a ground user's feedback loop could serve as the phase reference, which would remove one of the paper's stated bottlenecks.
The same cloud-native, microservice-based cluster fabric could host federated learning or multi-tenant AI inference for third-party users, turning the CCS into a shared space edge cloud — a commercial and regulatory extension the survey mentions only implicitly through network resource virtualization.
A scaled hardware-in-the-loop experiment with three to five small-satellite nodes emulating LEO dynamics would be a natural next validation step: measure coherent beamforming gain and information freshness under realistic oscillator noise to see whether the architecture's claimed gains survive synchronization imperfections.
The paper's repeated use of Age of Information as a performance metric suggests that future DSIN protocols should be judged by information freshness, not just throughput; a concrete benchmark would be average Age of Information under HARQ retransmissions across multi-satellite links.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

It's a capable survey, not a research paper. The value is organizational: it brings together architecture concepts (regenerative payloads, CU-DU splits, cloud-edge-local computing, formation flying) and a wide range of enabling technologies (OTFS, distributed MIMO, grant-free access, erasure coding, routing, mobility management) into one readable map. Someone new to DSIN will get a fair orientation, and even people in the field may find the coverage useful. The authors also deserve credit for being honest about the hard parts: they repeatedly call out precise phase/frequency/time synchronization across distributed nodes as 'extremely challenging' and note that terrestrial calibration methods do not carry over. That is the right instinct.

The soft spots are real and load-bearing. The abstract and Section 1.1 declare CCS an 'inevitable trend' in the evolution of space networks, but nothing in the paper closes the gap between that vision and the known blockers. The stress-test note is accurate: coherent cooperative transmission relies on phase-coherent distributed arrays and onboard cloud-native processing, but the paper supplies no oscillator-stability budget, no ISL capacity analysis for the feedback and data exchange, and no estimate of whether small satellites can run Docker/KubeEdge-class microservices under real power and thermal constraints. Section 2.2's cloud-edge-local architecture is presented as a proposal, which is fine, but it is not validated against those constraints. The 'inevitable trend' language should be softened to 'a promising direction' unless the authors add quantitative feasibility evidence.

Minor issues: the reference selection criteria are undocumented (the reader flagged this and I agree), some sections read as laundry lists of cited works rather than critical synthesis, and the prose is repetitive in places. None of that is fatal for a survey.

Bottom line: this is a useful roadmap with an honest acknowledgment of its own hardest problems, but the central thesis is asserted rather than demonstrated. I would not cite it for a new result, but I would cite it as an entry point to the DSIN literature. Bring it to a reading group if you want a broad, current overview of the field; skip it if you are looking for a rigorous feasibility argument. It deserves a serious referee: a good reviewer can push the authors to replace 'inevitable' with evidence and to add a dedicated technology-readiness discussion.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This survey proposes distributed satellite information networks (DSIN), exemplified by cohesive clustered satellite (CCS) systems, as the next step in the evolution of satellite networks. It reviews three architectural pillars (distributed regenerative payloads, distributed satellite computing, and reconfigurable formation flying), then surveys enabling technologies at the physical and link layers (channel modeling, cloud-native distributed MIMO, waveforms, coding, grant-free access, NOMA/RSMA, erasure protocols, inter-satellite links and routing) and cross-layer techniques (mobility management, resource management, and security). The central claim is that DSIN will bridge the silos of communication, navigation, and remote sensing and form a unified, open, resilient space information network.

Significance. If the DSIN vision is realized, the architectural and technological synthesis presented here would be a valuable reference for 6G satellite-terrestrial integration. The paper's strengths are its breadth, its up-to-date collection of references, and its honest enumeration of open problems in several subsections. The taxonomy of architectures and the treatment of cloud-native distributed MIMO, OTFS, grant-free access, and distributed routing are useful organizational contributions. However, the most load-bearing parts of the vision, namely coherent distributed transmission and cloud-native onboard processing, are described with feasibility caveats rather than quantitative support, and the framing of DSIN as an 'inevitable trend' is asserted rather than demonstrated.

major comments (3)

[Section 1.1 and Abstract] The paper states that 'the development of DSIN is no longer a mere concept but an inevitable trend in the evolution of space information technology and 6G networks.' This central claim is asserted without supporting evidence such as standards timelines, industry commitments, capacity projections, or quantitative comparisons against monolithic-satellite baselines. Since the abstract's promise of a 'unified, open information network paradigm' rests on this framing, the authors should either supply concrete evidence for the inevitability claim or reframe it as a promising research direction that remains contingent on the open feasibility issues listed later in the paper.
[Sections 3.2.2 and 3.4.2] The manuscript's own text states that with locally generated clocks, 'attaining precise synchronization and calibration in terms of absolute phase, frequency, and time becomes extremely challenging,' and that terrestrial synchronization and calibration technologies are inapplicable to satellite systems. Yet the proposed CCS architecture depends on coherent distributed beamforming and terminal-assisted phase synchronization to deliver its promised MIMO and phased-array gains. No oscillator-stability requirement, measurement/feedback overhead budget, or inter-satellite link capacity budget is provided for the terminal-assisted calibration loop under tens-to-hundreds-of-milliseconds delays. This missing quantitative feasibility analysis is load-bearing for the central claim, and the paper should either provide it or explicitly classify coherent distributed MIMO as an open research problem rather than an available enabling technology.
[Sections 2.2 and 2.1.2] The cloud-native satellite computing architecture assumes containerization with Docker, KubeEdge, and Kubernetes, as well as distributed baseband processing on small satellites, while Section 2.1.2 itself acknowledges 'limitations in payload, power supply, and heat dissipation on satellite platforms' that limit single-satellite processing capability. The manuscript gives no order-of-magnitude estimate of the computational overhead of these virtualization layers or of the available space-qualified compute resources. Since the proposed Cloud-Edge-Local architecture is presented as the 'cloud brain' of DSIN, the absence of a resource budget undermines the architecture's credibility. Please add quantitative constraints from existing small-satellite processors or clearly mark this architecture as an open feasibility question.

minor comments (5)

[Section 3.6] The acronym TSC is defined twice with different meanings: first as 'terrestrial-satellite communication' and later as 'Time-Sensitive Communications.' Please use distinct acronyms to avoid ambiguity.
[Section 3.6] The text 'Another research branch of GRRA' appears to contain a typo; 'GRRA' should be 'GFRA' (grant-free random access).
[Section 3.9.1] In the paragraph on relay-assisted FSO transmission, there is a missing citation after 'high-speed transmissions []' before the reference to [294]; please fill in the intended reference.
[Section 4.1.2] The phrase 'handover handover' is duplicated, and 'link management (LM)' should be 'location management (LM)' to match the subsection's terminology.
[Section 1.1] Minor grammatical issue: 'The above limitations has significantly enhanced' should be 'The above limitations have significantly enhanced.'

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: this is a survey/position paper that synthesizes independent prior work; no derivation, fitted parameter, or prediction reduces to the paper's own inputs.

full rationale

This paper is a survey and architecture overview, not a derivation chain. It fits no parameters, proposes no quantitative model that could be self-referential, and makes no prediction that is defined in terms of its own outputs. The central claim that distributed satellite information networks and cohesive clustered satellite systems will become an 'inevitable trend' is an asserted roadmap conclusion, not a result derived from equations in the paper. Enabling technologies such as cloud-native distributed MIMO, OTFS, distributed phased arrays, grant-free access, and routing are presented through citations to external literature, 3GPP specifications, CCSDS standards, and publicly documented projects (Starlink, NASA EO-1, DARPA F6, ESA missions); these are independent sources rather than self-citations carrying the argument. Where the paper states that synchronization and calibration are 'extremely challenging' when clocks are generated locally, this is an explicit feasibility caveat, not a circular step. Some self-citations appear (e.g., reference [45] on synchronization and [229] on routing), but they are background pointers within a broad synthesis and are not used to forbid alternatives or to define a claimed prediction. The 'unified, open information network' vision is a programmatic assertion whose support would require a joint feasibility demonstration, but lack of quantitative evidence is a correctness/completeness concern, not circularity. Therefore the appropriate finding is no significant circularity, score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The ledger captures background assumptions of the DSIN vision. There are no free parameters or invented entities because the paper presents no derivation, model, or new physical object. The two domain assumptions are the demand for unified space information services and the feasibility of the enabling technologies under satellite constraints.

assumptions (2)

domain assumption Current satellite networks are institutionally siloed and cannot meet future 6G information-service demands.
Stated in Section 1.1 as the motivation for DSIN; no quantitative evidence is provided for the claim that existing networks are insufficient.
domain assumption The enabling technologies can be integrated within satellite payload, power, and cost constraints.
The survey itself identifies synchronization, calibration, onboard processing, and ISL capacity as open challenges (Sections 3.2.2, 3.4.2, 3.9.1), so the viability of the proposed architecture assumes their feasibility.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Distributed satellite information networks: Architecture, enabling technologies, and trends." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YOWP47P7

@misc{pith2026241212587,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Distributed satellite information networks: Architecture, enabling technologies, and trends},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YOWP47P7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.12587}
}

read the original abstract

Driven by the vision of ubiquitous connectivity and wireless intelligence, the evolution of ultra-dense constellation-based satellite-integrated Internet is underway, now taking preliminary shape. Nevertheless, the entrenched institutional silos and limited, nonrenewable heterogeneous network resources leave current satellite systems struggling to accommodate the escalating demands of next-generation intelligent applications. In this context, the distributed satellite information networks (DSIN), exemplified by the cohesive clustered satellites system, have emerged as an innovative architecture, bridging information gaps across diverse satellite systems, such as communication, navigation, and remote sensing, and establishing a unified, open information network paradigm to support resilient space information services. This survey first provides a profound discussion about innovative network architectures of DSIN, encompassing distributed regenerative satellite network architecture, distributed satellite computing network architecture, and reconfigurable satellite formation flying, to enable flexible and scalable communication, computing and control. The DSIN faces challenges from network heterogeneity, unpredictable channel dynamics, sparse resources, and decentralized collaboration frameworks. To address these issues, a series of enabling technologies is identified, including channel modeling and estimation, cloud-native distributed MIMO cooperation, grant-free massive access, network routing, and the proper combination of all these diversity techniques. Furthermore, to heighten the overall resource efficiency, the cross-layer optimization techniques are further developed to meet upper-layer deterministic, adaptive and secure information services requirements. In addition, emerging research directions and new opportunities are highlighted on the way to achieving the DSIN vision.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

OSI Stack Redesign for Quantum Networks: Requirements, Technologies, Challenges, and Future Directions
quant-ph 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

The paper proposes a Quantum-Converged OSI stack with nine layers, adding Layer 0 (Quantum Substrate) and Layer 8 (Cognitive Intent Plane) to the classical OSI model for quantum networks.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

299 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

Reference title

Author A, Author B, Author C. Reference title. Journal, 2024, 38: 13--28

2024
[2]

Towards 6G wireless communication networks: Vision, enabling technologies, and new paradigm shifts

You X H, Wang C-X, Huang J, et al. Towards 6G wireless communication networks: Vision, enabling technologies, and new paradigm shifts. Sci China Inf Sci, 2021, 64: 110301

2021
[3]

Semantic-aware coordinated transmission in cohesive clustered satellites: Utility of information perspective

Xu L, Jiao J, Jiang S Y, et al. Semantic-aware coordinated transmission in cohesive clustered satellites: Utility of information perspective. Sci China Inf Sci, 2024, 67: 199301

2024
[4]

Integration of data center into the distributed satellite cluster networks: Challenges, techniques, and trends

Peng C, He Y Z, Zhao S H, et al. Integration of data center into the distributed satellite cluster networks: Challenges, techniques, and trends. IEEE Netw, 2023, 37: 52-58

2023
[5]

A survey on technologies, standards and open challenges in satellite IoT

Centenaro M, Costa C E, Granelli F, et al. A survey on technologies, standards and open challenges in satellite IoT. IEEE Commun Surv Tut, 2021, 23: 1693-1720

2021
[6]

Spatial ultra-sparse distributed antenna satellite-ground cooperative transmission architecture: Challenges, key technologies, and trends

He Y Z, Wang C X, Qi C W, et al. Spatial ultra-sparse distributed antenna satellite-ground cooperative transmission architecture: Challenges, key technologies, and trends. IEEE Commun Mag, 2024, 62: 136-143

2024
[7]

5G-Advanced: network-controlled repeater (in Chinese)

Zhang N, Li Z Y, Li R Y, et al. 5G-Advanced: network-controlled repeater (in Chinese). Telecommun Sci, 2022, 38: 169-176

2022
[8]

Satellite swarm-based antenna arrays for 6G direct-to-cell connectivity

Tuzi D, Delamotte T, Knopp A. Satellite swarm-based antenna arrays for 6G direct-to-cell connectivity. IEEE Access, 2023, 11: 36907--36928

2023

Show all 299 references

[9]

Performance assessment of sparse satellite swarms for 6G direct-to-cell connectivity

Tuzi D, Delamotte T, Knopp A. Performance assessment of sparse satellite swarms for 6G direct-to-cell connectivity. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications, Lucca, 2024. 616-620

2024
[10]

Study on new radio (NR) to support nonterrestrial networks (NTN) (Release 16)

3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP). Study on new radio (NR) to support nonterrestrial networks (NTN) (Release 16). TR 38.811. https://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/archive/38\_series/38.811
[11]

User-centric flexible resource management framework for LEO satellites with fully regenerative payload

Bhandari S, Vu T X , Chatzinotas S. User-centric flexible resource management framework for LEO satellites with fully regenerative payload. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun, 2024, 42: 1246-1261

2024
[12]

Evolution of high-throughput satellite systems: A vision of programmable regenerative payload

O.B Y, Zineb G, Olivier B, et al. Evolution of high-throughput satellite systems: A vision of programmable regenerative payload. IEEE Commun Surv Tut, 2024. doi: 10.1109/COMST.2024.3450292

2024
[13]

Spectrum sharing through marketplaces for O-RAN based non-terrestrial and terrestrial networks

Choi J, Li B, Al H, et al. Spectrum sharing through marketplaces for O-RAN based non-terrestrial and terrestrial networks. IEEE Internet Things Mag, 2024, 7: 128-134

2024
[14]

In: Proceedings of 2018 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exposition, San Diego, 2018

Yoshida Y, Mobile Xhaul Evolution: Enabling Tools for a Flexible 5G Xhaul Network. In: Proceedings of 2018 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exposition, San Diego, 2018. 1-85

2018
[15]

NG-RAN; Architecture description (Release 17)

3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP). NG-RAN; Architecture description (Release 17). TS 38.401. https://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/archive/38\_series/38.401
[16]

Study on new radio access technology; Radio access architecture and interfaces (Release 14)

3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP). Study on new radio access technology; Radio access architecture and interfaces (Release 14). TR 38.801. https://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/archive/38\_series/38.801
[17]

Deep reinforcement learning-based joint user association and CU-DU placement in O-RAN

Joda R, Pamuklu T, Iturria-Rivera P E, et al. Deep reinforcement learning-based joint user association and CU-DU placement in O-RAN. IEEE Trans Netw Serv Manag, 2022, 19: 4097-4110

2022
[18]

Satellite computing: Vision and challenges

Wang S G, Li Q. Satellite computing: Vision and challenges. IEEE Internet Things J, 2023, 10: 22514-22529

2023
[19]

A fundamental tradeoff between computation and communication in distributed computing

Li S Z, Maddah-Ali M A, Yu Q, et al. A fundamental tradeoff between computation and communication in distributed computing. IEEE Trans Inf Theory, 2018, 64(1): 109--128

2018
[20]

A comprehensive survey on coded distributed computing: Fundamentals, challenges, and networking applications

Ng J S, Lim W Y B, Luong N C, et al. A comprehensive survey on coded distributed computing: Fundamentals, challenges, and networking applications. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials, 2021, 23(3): 1800--1837

2021
[21]

Distributed artificial intelligence empowered by end-edge-cloud computing: A survey

Duan S J, Wang D, Ren J, et al. Distributed artificial intelligence empowered by end-edge-cloud computing: A survey. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials, 2023, 25(1): 591--624

2023
[22]

Collaborative deep reinforcement learning in 6G integrated satellite-terrestrial networks: Paradigm, solutions, and trends

Yang Y, He X Y, Lee J, et al. Collaborative deep reinforcement learning in 6G integrated satellite-terrestrial networks: Paradigm, solutions, and trends. IEEE Commun Mag, 2025, 63(1): 188--195

2025
[23]

Cloud-native computing: A survey from the perspective of services

Deng S G, Zhao H L, Huang B B, et al. Cloud-native computing: A survey from the perspective of services. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2024, 112(1): 12-46

2024
[24]

Satellite clustering for non-terrestrial networks: Concept, architectures, and applications

Jung D-H, Im G, Ryu J-G, et al. Satellite clustering for non-terrestrial networks: Concept, architectures, and applications. IEEE Veh Technol Mag, 2023, 18: 29-37

2023
[25]

Architecture, technologies and experiment of satellite-terrestrial network based on space-based simplified core network (in Chinese)

Pan X H, Lu L, Deng P K, et al. Architecture, technologies and experiment of satellite-terrestrial network based on space-based simplified core network (in Chinese). Telecommun Sci, 2024, 40: 49-59

2024
[26]

End-edge-cloud collaborative computing for deep learning: A comprehensive survey

Wang Y C, Yang C, Lan S L, et al. End-edge-cloud collaborative computing for deep learning: A comprehensive survey. IEEE Commun Surv Tut, 2024, 26: 2647-2683

2024
[27]

Onboard information fusion for multisatellite collaborative observation: Summary, challenges, and perspectives, IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Mag, 2023, 11: 40-59

Gao G, Yao L B, Li W F, et al. Onboard information fusion for multisatellite collaborative observation: Summary, challenges, and perspectives, IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Mag, 2023, 11: 40-59

2023
[28]

FedFusion: Manifold-driven federated learning for multi-satellite and multi-modality fusion

Li D X, Xie W Y, Li Y S, et al. FedFusion: Manifold-driven federated learning for multi-satellite and multi-modality fusion. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens, 2024, 62:1-13

2024
[29]

Multi-satellite-enabled edge computing: An offloading and computation integration approach

Xi S Y, Shang B D, Zhang H X, et al. Multi-satellite-enabled edge computing: An offloading and computation integration approach. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Intelligent Communications and Computing, Nanchang, 2023. 151-156

2023
[30]

Latency optimization for hybrid GEO/CLEO satellite-assisted IoT networks

Cui G F, Duan P F, Xu L X, et al. Latency optimization for hybrid GEO/CLEO satellite-assisted IoT networks. IEEE Internet Things J, 2023, 10: 6286-6297

2023
[31]

Intelligent sensing, communication, computation, and caching for satellite-ground integrated networks

Gong Y K, Yao H P, Nallanathan A. Intelligent sensing, communication, computation, and caching for satellite-ground integrated networks. IEEE Netw, 2024, 38: 9-16

2024
[32]

Model division multiple access for semantic communications

Zhang P, Xu X D, Dong C, et al. Model division multiple access for semantic communications. Front Inf Technol Electron Eng, 2023, 24:801--812

2023
[33]

A survey on formation control of small satellites

Liu G-P, Zhang S J. A survey on formation control of small satellites. Proc IEEE, 2018, 106: 440-457

2018
[34]

A review on development of formation flying interferometric SAR satellite system

Yin J F, Zhang Q J, Liu J, et al. A review on development of formation flying interferometric SAR satellite system. Spacecraft Eng, 2018, 27: 116-122

2018
[35]

Terminal guidance system for satellite rendezvous

Clohessy W H, Wiltshire R S. Terminal guidance system for satellite rendezvous. J Aerospace Sci, 1960, 27: 653-658

1960
[36]

Optimale beschleunigungsprogramme fur das rendezvous-manover

Tschauner J, Hempel P. Optimale beschleunigungsprogramme fur das rendezvous-manover. Astron Acta, 1964, 10: 296

1964
[37]

Edge information hub: Orchestrating satellites, UAVs, MEC, sensing and communications for 6G closed-loop controls

Lei C L, Feng W, Wei P, et al. Edge information hub: Orchestrating satellites, UAVs, MEC, sensing and communications for 6G closed-loop controls. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun, 2025, 43(1): 5--20

2025
[38]

Satellite formation flying: relative dynamics, formation design, fuel optimal maneuvers and formation maintenance

Wang D W, Wu B L, Poh E K. Satellite formation flying: relative dynamics, formation design, fuel optimal maneuvers and formation maintenance. Singapore: Springer Press, 2016

2016
[39]

Leader-following adaptive consensus of multiple uncertain rigid spacecraft systems

Cai H, Huang J. Leader-following adaptive consensus of multiple uncertain rigid spacecraft systems. Sci China Inf Sci, 2016, 59: 1-13

2016
[40]

Neural network-based distributed attitude coordination control for spacecraft formation flying with input saturation

Zou A-M, Kumar K D. Neural network-based distributed attitude coordination control for spacecraft formation flying with input saturation. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst, 2012, 23: 1155--1162

2012
[41]

Behavior-based formation control for multirobot teams

Balch T, Arkin R C. Behavior-based formation control for multirobot teams. IEEE Trans Robot Autom, 1998, 14: 926--939

1998
[42]

Spacecraft formation reconfiguration with collision avoidance

Schlanbusch R, Kristiansen R, Nicklasson P J. Spacecraft formation reconfiguration with collision avoidance. Automatica, 2011, 47: 1443-1449

2011
[43]

Formation control of aerial robots using virtual structure and new fuzzy-based self-tuning synchronization

Abbasi Y, Moosavian S A A, Novinzadeh A B. Formation control of aerial robots using virtual structure and new fuzzy-based self-tuning synchronization. IEEE Trans Inst Meas Control, 2017, 39: 1906-1919

2017
[44]

Optimal reconfiguration control of electromagnetic satellite formation

Song Y Y, Zhou Q R, Chen Q W, et al. Optimal reconfiguration control of electromagnetic satellite formation. In: Proceedings of IEEE 41st Chinese Control Conference, Hefei, 2022. 1809-1814

2022
[45]

Minimum-fuel formation reconfiguration of multiple free-flying spacecraft

Wang P K C, Hadaegh F Y. Minimum-fuel formation reconfiguration of multiple free-flying spacecraft. J Astronaut Sci, 1999, 47: 77-102

1999
[46]

Architectures and synchronization techniques for distributed satellite systems: A survey

Marrero L M, Merlano-Duncan J C, Querol J, et al. Architectures and synchronization techniques for distributed satellite systems: A survey. IEEE Access, 2022, 10: 45375-45409

2022
[47]

Necessary and sufficient conditions for attitude estimation in fractionated spacecraft systems

Blackmore L, Hadaegh F. Necessary and sufficient conditions for attitude estimation in fractionated spacecraft systems. In: Proceedings of AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, Chicago, 2009. 6095

2009
[48]

Event-triggering sampling based leader-following consensus in second-order multi-agent systems

Li H Q, Liao X F, Huang T W, et al. Event-triggering sampling based leader-following consensus in second-order multi-agent systems. IEEE Trans Autom Control, 2014, 60: 1998-2003

2014
[49]

Distributed optimization of first-order discrete-time multi-agent systems with event-triggered communication

L \"u Q G, Li H Q, Xia D W. Distributed optimization of first-order discrete-time multi-agent systems with event-triggered communication. Neurocomputing, 2017, 235: 255-263

2017
[50]

Cooperative control with general linear dynamics and limited communication: Centralized and decentralized event-triggered control strategies

Garcia E, Cao Y C, Casbeer D W. Cooperative control with general linear dynamics and limited communication: Centralized and decentralized event-triggered control strategies. In: Proceedings of American Control Conference, Portland, 2014. 159-164

2014
[51]

Event-based consensus of multi-agent systems with general linear models

Zhu W, Jiang Z-P, Feng G. Event-based consensus of multi-agent systems with general linear models. Automatica, 2014, 50: 552-558

2014
[52]

Semi-global consensus of nonlinear second-order multi-agent systems with measurement output feedback

Fan M-C, Chen Z Y, Zhang H-T. Semi-global consensus of nonlinear second-order multi-agent systems with measurement output feedback. IEEE Trans on Autom Control, 2014, 59: 2222-2227

2014
[53]

LQ-based event-triggered controller co-design for saturated linear systems

Seuret A, Prieur C, Tarbouriech S, et al. LQ-based event-triggered controller co-design for saturated linear systems. Automatica, 2016, 74: 47-54

2016
[54]

The use of Lambert's theorem in orbit determination

Sconzo P. The use of Lambert's theorem in orbit determination. Astron J, 1962, 67: 19-21

1962
[55]

Alternative approach to the solution of Lambert's problem

Nelson S L, Zarchan P. Alternative approach to the solution of Lambert's problem. J Guid Control Dyn, 1992, 15: 1003-1009

1992
[56]

A simple Lambert algorithm

Avanzini G. A simple Lambert algorithm. J Guid Control Dyn, 2008, 31: 1587-1594

2008
[57]

A simple Lambert algorithm

Zhang G. A simple Lambert algorithm. J Guid Control Dyn, 2020, 43: 1529-1539

2020
[58]

Homotopic perturbed Lambert algorithm for long-duration rendezvous optimization

Yang Z, Luo Y-Z, Zhang J, et al. Homotopic perturbed Lambert algorithm for long-duration rendezvous optimization. J Guid Control Dyn, 2015, 38: 2215-2223

2015
[59]

Reachable domain of ground track with a single impulse

Zhang H Y, Zhang G. Reachable domain of ground track with a single impulse. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst, 2020, 57: 1105-1122

2020
[60]

Convergence behavior of series solutions of the Lambert problem

Thorne J D. Convergence behavior of series solutions of the Lambert problem. J Guid Control Dyn, 2015, 38: 1821-1826

2015
[61]

On the road to 6G: Visions, requirements, key technologies, and testbeds

Wang C-X, You X H, Gao X Q, et al. On the road to 6G: Visions, requirements, key technologies, and testbeds. IEEE Commun Surv Tut, 2023, 25: 905-974

2023
[62]

Massive MIMO downlink transmission for multiple LEO satellite communication

Xiang Z Y, Gao X Q, Li K-X, et al. Massive MIMO downlink transmission for multiple LEO satellite communication. IEEE Trans Commun 2024, 72: 3352-3364

2024
[63]

Channel modeling for multiple satellite broadcasting systems

Milojevic M, Haardt M, Eberlein E et al. Channel modeling for multiple satellite broadcasting systems. IEEE Trans Broadcast, 2009, 55: 705-718

2009
[64]

Performance analysis and evaluation of inter-satellite optical wireless communication system (IsOWC) from GEO to LEO at range 45000 km

Tawfik M M, Sree M F A, Abaza M, et al. Performance analysis and evaluation of inter-satellite optical wireless communication system (IsOWC) from GEO to LEO at range 45000 km. IEEE Photon J, 2021, 13: 1-6

2021
[65]

Performance analysis of satellite communication system under the shadowed-Rician fading: A stochastic geometry approach

Jung D-H, Ryu J-G, Byun W-J, et al. Performance analysis of satellite communication system under the shadowed-Rician fading: A stochastic geometry approach. IEEE Trans Commun, 2022, 70: 2707-2721

2022
[66]

IEEE Trans Mach Learn Commun Netw, 2023, 1: 78-89

Homssi B A, Chan C C, Wang K, et al., Deep learning forecasting and statistical modeling for Q/V-Band LEO satellite channels. IEEE Trans Mach Learn Commun Netw, 2023, 1: 78-89

2023
[67]

5G embraces satellites for 6G ubiquitous IoT: Basic models for integrated satellite terrestrial networks

Fang X R, Feng W, Wei T, et al. 5G embraces satellites for 6G ubiquitous IoT: Basic models for integrated satellite terrestrial networks. IEEE Internet Things J, 2021, 8: 14399-14417

2021
[68]

OFDM-based massive connectivity for LEO satellite Internet of Things

Zuo Y, Yue M Y, Zhang M C, et al. OFDM-based massive connectivity for LEO satellite Internet of Things. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun, 2023, 22: 8244-8258

2023
[69]

`Massive MIMO transmission for LEO satellite communications

You L, Li K-X, Wang J H, et al. `Massive MIMO transmission for LEO satellite communications. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun, 2020, 38: 1851-1865

2020
[70]

Channel estimation for LEO satellite massive MIMO OFDM communications

Li K-XX, Gao X Q, Xia X-G. Channel estimation for LEO satellite massive MIMO OFDM communications. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun, 2023, 22: 7537-7550

2023
[71]

ARM: Adaptive random-selected multi-beamforming estimation scheme for satellite-based Internet of Things

Wang Y, Li Q W, Jiao J, et al. ARM: Adaptive random-selected multi-beamforming estimation scheme for satellite-based Internet of Things. IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 63264-63276

2019
[72]

Deep learning (DL)-based channel prediction and hybrid beamforming for LEO satellite massive MIMO system

Zhang Y Y, Liu A J, Li P H, et al. Deep learning (DL)-based channel prediction and hybrid beamforming for LEO satellite massive MIMO system. IEEE Internet Things J, 2022, 9: 23705-23715

2022
[73]

MIMO-OFDM channel detection algorithm in multi-station and multi-satellite uplink system based on deep learning

Lu S, Yu B G, Tang C K, et al. MIMO-OFDM channel detection algorithm in multi-station and multi-satellite uplink system based on deep learning. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing, Communications and Computing, Xi'an, 2021. 1-4

2021
[74]

Machine learning-based channel prediction in massive MIMO with channel aging

Yuan J D, Ngo H Q, Matthaiou M. Machine learning-based channel prediction in massive MIMO with channel aging. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun, 2020, 19(5): 2960--2973

2020
[75]

Deep learning-based channel prediction for LEO satellite massive MIMO communication system

Zhang Y Y, Wu Y L, Liu A J, et al. Deep learning-based channel prediction for LEO satellite massive MIMO communication system. IEEE Wirel Commun Lett, 2021, 10(8): 1835--1839

2021
[76]

Sparse channel estimation and hybrid precoding using deep learning for millimeter wave massive MIMO

Ma W Y, Qi C H, Zhang Z C, et al. Sparse channel estimation and hybrid precoding using deep learning for millimeter wave massive MIMO. IEEE Trans Commun, 2020, 68(5): 2838--2849

2020
[77]

Deep learning-based joint channel prediction and multibeam precoding for LEO satellite Internet of Things

Ying M, Chen X M, Qi Q, et al. Deep learning-based joint channel prediction and multibeam precoding for LEO satellite Internet of Things. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun, 2024, 23(10): 13946--13960

2024
[78]

Towards explainable AI for channel estimation in wireless communications

Gizzini A K, Medjahdi Y, Ghandour A J, et al. Towards explainable AI for channel estimation in wireless communications. IEEE Trans Veh Technol, 2024, 73(5): 7389--7394

2024
[79]

Massive MIMO uplink transmission for multiple LEO satellite communication

Xiang Z, Sun R, Gong X, et al. Massive MIMO uplink transmission for multiple LEO satellite communication. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst, 2024

2024
[80]

Multi-satellite MIMO systems for direct satellite-to-device communications: A Survey

Bakhsh Z M, Omid Y, Chen G, et al. Multi-satellite MIMO systems for direct satellite-to-device communications: A Survey. IEEE Commun Surv Tut, 2024

2024
[81]

Massive MIMO downlink transmission for multiple LEO satellite communication

Xiang Z, Gao X, Li K X, et al. Massive MIMO downlink transmission for multiple LEO satellite communication. IEEE Trans Commun, 2024

2024
[82]

Making Cell-free massive MIMO competitive With MMSE processing and centralized implementation

Björnson E, Sanguinetti L. Making Cell-free massive MIMO competitive With MMSE processing and centralized implementation. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun, 2020, 19: 77-90

2020
[83]

Distributed massive MIMO for LEO satellite networks

Abdelsadek M Y, Kurt G K, Yanikomeroglu H. Distributed massive MIMO for LEO satellite networks. IEEE Open J Comm Soc, 2022, 3: 2162-2177

2022
[84]

Full-spectrum cell-free RAN for 6G systems: system design and experimental results

Wang D M, You X H, Huang Y M, Xu W, et al. Full-spectrum cell-free RAN for 6G systems: system design and experimental results. Sci China Inf Sci, 2023, 66(3): 130305

2023
[85]

Cloud-native orchestration framework for network slice federation across administrative domains in 5G/6G mobile networks

Dalgitsis M, Cadenelli N, Serrano M A, et al. Cloud-native orchestration framework for network slice federation across administrative domains in 5G/6G mobile networks. IEEE Trans Veh Technol, 2024

2024
[86]

Experimental performance evaluation of cell-free massive MIMO systems using COTS RRU with OTA reciprocity calibration and phase synchronization

Cao Y, Wang P, Zheng K, et al. Experimental performance evaluation of cell-free massive MIMO systems using COTS RRU with OTA reciprocity calibration and phase synchronization. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun, 2023, 41(6): 1620-1634

2023
[87]

Scalable synchronization and reciprocity calibration for distributed multiuser MIMO

Rogalin R, Bursalioglu O Y, Papadopoulos H, et al. Scalable synchronization and reciprocity calibration for distributed multiuser MIMO. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun, 2014, 13(4): 1815-1831

2014
[88]

Real-time distributed MIMO systems

Hamed E, Rahul H, Abdelghany M A, et al. Real-time distributed MIMO systems. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM Conference. 2016. 412-425

2016
[89]

Modeling the distributed MU-MIMO OAI 5G testbed and group-based OTA calibration performance evaluation

Magounaki T, Kaltenberger F, Knopp R. Modeling the distributed MU-MIMO OAI 5G testbed and group-based OTA calibration performance evaluation. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications. 2020. 1-5

2020
[90]

D., Bengtsson M, et al

Gharanjik A, Bhavani Shankar M.R., Arapoglou P. D., Bengtsson M, et al. Robust precoding design for multibeam downlink satellite channel with phase uncertainty. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing. 2015. 3083-3087

2015
[91]

Robust cascaded team MMSE precoding for cell-free distributed downlink under hierarchical fronthaul

Hong Z, Xu S, Li T, et al. Robust cascaded team MMSE precoding for cell-free distributed downlink under hierarchical fronthaul. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun, 2024

2024
[92]

Satellite computing: A case study of cloud-native satellites

Wang C, Zhang Y R, Li Q, Zhou A, et al. Satellite computing: A case study of cloud-native satellites. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Edge Computing and Communications. 2023. 262-270

2023
[93]

Implementation of a cloud-based cell-free distributed massive MIMO system

Wang D M, Zhang C, Du Y Q, et al. Implementation of a cloud-based cell-free distributed massive MIMO system. IEEE Commun Mag, 2020, 58(8): 61-67

2020
[94]

Live demonstration: A cloud-based cell-free distributed massive MIMO system

Wang D M, Zhang C, Ji Z H, et al. Live demonstration: A cloud-based cell-free distributed massive MIMO system. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, Daegu, Korea, 2021. 1--1

2021
[95]

OFDM and its wireless applications: A survey

Hwang T, Yang C Y, Wu G, et al. OFDM and its wireless applications: A survey. IEEE Trans Veh Tech, 2009, 58: 1673--1694

2009
[96]

Frequency domain equalization for single-carrier broadband wireless systems

Falconer D, Ariyavisitakul S, Benyamin-Seeyar B, et al. Frequency domain equalization for single-carrier broadband wireless systems. IEEE Commun Mag, 2002, 40: 58--66

2002
[97]

Universal-filtered multi-carrier technique for wireless systems beyond LTE

Vakilian V, Wild T, Schaich F, et al. Universal-filtered multi-carrier technique for wireless systems beyond LTE. In: Proceedings of IEEE Global Communications Conference Workshops, Atlanta, 2013. 223--228

2013
[98]

Filtered-OFDM-enabler for flexible waveform in the 5th generation cellular networks

Zhang X, Jia M, Chen L, et al. Filtered-OFDM-enabler for flexible waveform in the 5th generation cellular networks. In: Proceedings of IEEE Global Communications Conference, San Diego, 2015. 1--6

2015
[99]

OFDM versus filter bank multicarrier

Farhang-Boroujeny B. OFDM versus filter bank multicarrier. IEEE Signal Process Mag, 2011, 28: 92--112

2011
[100]

Generalized frequency division multiplexing for 5th generation cellular networks

Michailow N, Matth \' e M, Gaspar I S, et al. Generalized frequency division multiplexing for 5th generation cellular networks. IEEE Trans Commun, 2014, 62: 3045--3061

2014
[101]

Edge windowing for OFDM-based systems

Sahin A, Arslan H. Edge windowing for OFDM-based systems. IEEE Commun Lett, 2011, 15: 1208--1211

2011
[102]

Synchronization for OFDM-based satellite communication system

Huang M N, Chen J, Feng S L. Synchronization for OFDM-based satellite communication system. IEEE Trans Veh Tech, 2021, 70: 5693--5702

2021
[103]

Study on narrow-band Internet of things (NB-IoT)/enhanced machine type communication (eMTC) support for non-terrestrial networks (NTN) (Release 17)

3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP). Study on narrow-band Internet of things (NB-IoT)/enhanced machine type communication (eMTC) support for non-terrestrial networks (NTN) (Release 17). TR 36.763. https://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/archive/36\_series/36.763
[104]

Orthogonal time frequency space modulation

Hadani R, Rakib S, Tsatsanis M, et al. Orthogonal time frequency space modulation. In: Proceedings of IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, San Francisco, 2017. 1--6

2017
[105]

OTFS modulation for non-terrestrial networks: Concepts, applications, benefits, and challenges

Chu T M C, Zepernick H -J, H \" u \" u k A, et al. OTFS modulation for non-terrestrial networks: Concepts, applications, benefits, and challenges. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Signal Processing and Communication System, Bydgoszcz, 2023. 1--10

2023
[106]

Characteristics of channel spreading function and performance of OTFS in high-speed railway

Ma Y Y, Ma G Y, Ai B, et al. Characteristics of channel spreading function and performance of OTFS in high-speed railway. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun, 2023, 22: 7038--7054

2023
[107]

OTFS modulation waveform and reference signals for new RAT (Release 17)

3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP). OTFS modulation waveform and reference signals for new RAT (Release 17). TSG RAN WG1, R1-162930. https://www.3gpp.org/ftp/tsg\_ ran/WG1\_RL1/TSGR1\_84/Docs
[108]

Low complexity modem structure for OFDM-based orthogonal time frequency space modulation

Farhang A, RezazadehReyhani A, Doyle L E, et al. Low complexity modem structure for OFDM-based orthogonal time frequency space modulation. IEEE Wirel Commun Lett, 2018, 7: 344--347

2018
[109]

OTFS enabled LEO satellite communications: A promising solution to severe Doppler effects

Shi J, Li Z, Hu J, et al. OTFS enabled LEO satellite communications: A promising solution to severe Doppler effects. IEEE Netw, 2024, 38: 203--209

2024
[110]

OTFS-NOMA system for MIMO communication networks with spatial diversity

Hedhly W, Musavian L, Thomos N. OTFS-NOMA system for MIMO communication networks with spatial diversity. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Communications, Denver, 2024. 569--574

2024
[111]

Cross domain iterative detection for orthogonal time frequency space modulation

Li S Y, Yuan W J, Wei Z Q, et al. Cross domain iterative detection for orthogonal time frequency space modulation. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun, 2022, 21: 2227--2242

2022
[112]

Transmitter and receiver window designs for orthogonal time-frequency space modulation

Wei Z Q, Yuan W J, Li S Y, et al. Transmitter and receiver window designs for orthogonal time-frequency space modulation. IEEE Trans Commun, 2021, 69: 2207--2223

2021
[113]

Low-complexity symbol detection and interference cancellation for OTFS system

Qu H Y, Liu G H, Zhang L, et al. Low-complexity symbol detection and interference cancellation for OTFS system. IEEE Trans Commun, 2021, 69: 1524--1537

2021
[114]

Performance of ODDM with imperfect channel estimation

Huang K H, Qiu M, Tong J, et al. Performance of ODDM with imperfect channel estimation. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications, Shanghai, 2023. 561--565

2023
[115]

Low complexity Turbo SIC-MMSE detection for orthogonal time frequency space modulation

Li Q, Yuan J H, Qiu M, et al. Low complexity Turbo SIC-MMSE detection for orthogonal time frequency space modulation. IEEE Trans Commun, 2024, 72: 3169--3183

2024
[116]

Performance analysis of OTFS under in-phase and quadrature imbalance at transmitter

Tusha A, D o gan-Tusha S, Yilmaz F, et al. Performance analysis of OTFS under in-phase and quadrature imbalance at transmitter. IEEE Trans Veh Technol, 2021, 70: 11761--11771

2021
[117]

Physical effect of in-phase and quadrature imbalance in delay-Doppler domain

Tusha A, D o gan-Tusha S, Yilmaz F, et al. Physical effect of in-phase and quadrature imbalance in delay-Doppler domain. In: Proceedings of IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, Norman, 2021. 1--6

2021
[118]

Analysis, estimation and compensation of hardware impairments for CP-OTFS systems

Neelam S G, Sahu P. Analysis, estimation and compensation of hardware impairments for CP-OTFS systems. IEEE Wirel Commun Lett, 2022, 11: 952--956

2022
[119]

On OTFS modulation for high-Doppler fading channels

Murali K, Chockalingam A. On OTFS modulation for high-Doppler fading channels. In: Proceedings of Information Theory and Applications Workshop, 2018. 1--10

2018
[120]

Embedded pilot-aided channel estimation for OTFS in delay-Doppler channels

Raviteja P, Phan KT, Hong Y. Embedded pilot-aided channel estimation for OTFS in delay-Doppler channels. IEEE Trans Veh Tech, 2019, 68: 4906--4917

2019
[121]

A CS-BEM OTFS channel estimation approach for Sparse continuous Doppler-spread channels

Guo Q, Jiang H Y, Xiang J H, et al. A CS-BEM OTFS channel estimation approach for Sparse continuous Doppler-spread channels. IEEE Wirel Commun Lett, 2024. doi: 10.1109/LWC.2024.3432090

2024
[122]

Sparse Bayesian learning of delay-Doppler channel for OTFS system

Zhao L, Gao W-J , Guo W B. Sparse Bayesian learning of delay-Doppler channel for OTFS system. IEEE Commun Lett, 2020, 24: 2766--2769

2020
[123]

Data-aided channel estimation for OTFS systems with a superimposed pilot and data transmission scheme

Yuan W J, Li S Y, Wei Z Q, et al. Data-aided channel estimation for OTFS systems with a superimposed pilot and data transmission scheme. IEEE Wirel Commun Lett, 2021, 10: 1954--1958

2021
[124]

Joint Bayesian channel estimation and data detection for OTFS systems in LEO satellite communications

Wang X Y, Shen W Q, Xing C W, et al. Joint Bayesian channel estimation and data detection for OTFS systems in LEO satellite communications. IEEE Trans Commun, 2022, 70: 4386--4399

2022
[125]

LEO satellite diversity in 6G non-terrestrial networks: OFDM vs

Buzzi S, Caire G, Colavolpe G, et al. LEO satellite diversity in 6G non-terrestrial networks: OFDM vs. OTFS. IEEE Commun Lett, 2023, 27: 3013--3017

2023
[126]

Cooperative dual LEO satellite transmission in multi-user OTFS systems

Caus C, Shaat M, P \` e rez-Neira A I, et al. Cooperative dual LEO satellite transmission in multi-user OTFS systems. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing Workshops, Rhodes Island, 2023. 1--5

2023
[127]

Coordinated multi-satellite transmission for OTFS-based 6G LEO satellite communication systems

Zhang Z Q, Wu Y C, Ma Z, et al. Coordinated multi-satellite transmission for OTFS-based 6G LEO satellite communication systems. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun, 2024. doi: 10.1109/JSAC.2024.3460108

2024
[128]

On the diversity of uncoded OTFS modulation in doubly-dispersive channels

Surabhi G D, Augustine R M, Chockalingam A. On the diversity of uncoded OTFS modulation in doubly-dispersive channels. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun, 2019, 18: 3049--3063

2019
[129]

MIMO-OTFS in high-Doppler fading channels: Signal detection and channel estimation

Ramachandran M K, Chockalingam A. MIMO-OTFS in high-Doppler fading channels: Signal detection and channel estimation. In Proceedings of IEEE Global Communications Conference, Abu Dhabi, 2018. 206--212

2018
[130]

Channel capacity of MIMO architecture using the exponential correlation matrix

Loyka S L. Channel capacity of MIMO architecture using the exponential correlation matrix. IEEE Commun Lett, 2001, 5: 369--371

2001
[131]

Low-complexity linear diversity-combining detector for MIMO-OTFS

Thaj T, Viterbo E. Low-complexity linear diversity-combining detector for MIMO-OTFS. IEEE Wirel Commun Lett, 2022, 11: 288--292

2022
[132]

Spatially correlated MIMO-OTFS for LEO satellite communication systems

Bora A S, Phan K T, Hong Y. Spatially correlated MIMO-OTFS for LEO satellite communication systems. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops, Seoul, 2022. 723--728

2022
[133]

Efficient channel equalization and symbol detection for MIMO OTFS systems

Qu H Y, Liu G H, Imran M A. Efficient channel equalization and symbol detection for MIMO OTFS systems. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun, 2022, 21: 6672--6686

2022
[134]

Mitigating spatial correlation in MIMO-OTFS

Bora A S, Phan K T, Hong Y. Mitigating spatial correlation in MIMO-OTFS. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology IEEE Trans Veh Technol, 2024, 73: 3608--3622

2024
[135]

Random access with massive MIMO-OTFS in LEO satellite communications

Shen B X, Wu Y P, An J P. Random access with massive MIMO-OTFS in LEO satellite communications. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun, 2022, 40: 2865--2881

2022
[137]

Modeling and analysis of physical layer security of OTFS systems under transmit antenna selection and passive eavesdropping

Gunjan G, Shrivastava S, Kashyap S. Modeling and analysis of physical layer security of OTFS systems under transmit antenna selection and passive eavesdropping. IEEE Commun Lett, 2024, 28: 483--487

2024
[138]

Secrecy analysis for orthogonal time frequency space scheme based uplink LEO satellite communication

Hu J F, Shi J, Ma S, et al. Secrecy analysis for orthogonal time frequency space scheme based uplink LEO satellite communication. IEEE Wirel Commun Lett, 2021, 10: 1623--1627

2021
[139]

Secrecy performance analysis for OTFS modulation based downlink LEO satellite communication

Niu H C, Hu J F, Shi J, et al. Secrecy performance analysis for OTFS modulation based downlink LEO satellite communication. In: Proceedings of IEEE Global Communications Conference Workshops, Kuala Lumpur, 2023. 2135--2139

2023
[140]

Distributed transmit beamforming: Challenges and recent progress

Mudumbai R, Brown D R III, Madhow U, et al. Distributed transmit beamforming: Challenges and recent progress. IEEE Commun Mag, 2009, 47: 102-110

2009
[141]

Open-loop coherent distributed arrays

Nanzer J A, Schmid R L, Comberiate T M, et al. Open-loop coherent distributed arrays. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech, 2017, 65: 1662-1672

2017
[142]

Distributed phased arrays: Challenges and recent advances

Nanzer J A, Mghabghab S R, Ellison S M, et al. Distributed phased arrays: Challenges and recent advances. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech, 2021, 69(11): 4893-4907

2021
[143]

High accuracy distributed Kalman filtering for synchronizing frequency and phase in distributed phased arrays

Rashid M, Nanzer J A. High accuracy distributed Kalman filtering for synchronizing frequency and phase in distributed phased arrays. IEEE Signal Process Lett, 2023, 30: 688-692

2023
[144]

Millimeter-wave integrated phased arrays

Zhao D X, Gu P, Zhong J C, et al. Millimeter-wave integrated phased arrays. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst I Reg Papers, 2021, 68: 3977-3990

2021
[145]

W-band CMOS beamforming ICs and integrated phased-array antennas with 20+ Gb/s data rates

Zhao D X, Yu P G, Jiang S, et al. W-band CMOS beamforming ICs and integrated phased-array antennas with 20+ Gb/s data rates. Sci China Inf Sci, 2024, 67: 212301

2024
[146]

A 24.25-27.5 GHz 128-element dual-polarized 5G integrated phased array with 5.6\

Liu H Q, Zhao D X, Yi Y R, et al. A 24.25-27.5 GHz 128-element dual-polarized 5G integrated phased array with 5.6\
[147]

Design and implementation of CMOS millimeter-wave ICs and 4096 TX/4096 RX large-scale integrated phased-array antenna

Zhao D X, Chen Z H, You X H. Design and implementation of CMOS millimeter-wave ICs and 4096 TX/4096 RX large-scale integrated phased-array antenna. Sci Sin Inf, 2021, 51: 505-519

2021
[148]

A scalable Ka-band 1024-element transmit dual-circularly-polarized planar phased array for SATCOM application

Luo X, Ouyang J, Chen Z-H, et al. A scalable Ka-band 1024-element transmit dual-circularly-polarized planar phased array for SATCOM application. IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 156084-156095

2020
[149]

A low-power radiation-hardened Ka-band CMOS phased-array receiver for small satellite constellation

Fu X, You D, Wang Y, et al. A low-power radiation-hardened Ka-band CMOS phased-array receiver for small satellite constellation. IEEE J Solid-State Circuits, 2024, 59: 349-363

2024
[150]

A K-band hybrid-packaged temperature-compensated phased-array receiver and integrated antenna array

Zhao D X, Gu P, Yi Y R, et al. A K-band hybrid-packaged temperature-compensated phased-array receiver and integrated antenna array. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech, 2022, 71(1): 409-423

2022
[151]

On the feasibility of distributed beamforming in wireless networks

Mudumbai R, Barriac G, Madhow U. On the feasibility of distributed beamforming in wireless networks. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun, 2007, 6: 1754-1763

2007
[152]

Channel estimation techniques based on pilot arrangement in OFDM systems

Coleri S, Ergen M, Puri A, et al. Channel estimation techniques based on pilot arrangement in OFDM systems. IEEE Trans Broadcast, 2002, 48: 223-229

2002
[153]

K/Ka-band hybrid-packaged four-element four-beam phased-array transmitter and receiver front-ends with optimized beamforming passive networks

Yang M R, Zhao D X, Xu C Y, et al. K/Ka-band hybrid-packaged four-element four-beam phased-array transmitter and receiver front-ends with optimized beamforming passive networks. IEEE J Solid-State Circuits, 2024, 59: 3142-3155

2024
[154]

Multibeam phased-arrays using dual-vector distributed beamforming: Architecture overview and 28 GHz transceiver prototypes

Yeh Y S, Floyd B A. Multibeam phased-arrays using dual-vector distributed beamforming: Architecture overview and 28 GHz transceiver prototypes. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst I Reg Papers, 2020, 67: 5496-5509

2020
[155]

An orthogonal hybrid analog-digital multibeam antenna array for millimeter-wave massive MIMO systems

Hu Y, Zhan J, Jiang Z H, et al. An orthogonal hybrid analog-digital multibeam antenna array for millimeter-wave massive MIMO systems. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag, 2020, 69: 1393-1403

2020
[156]

A review of multibeam phased array antennas as LEO satellite constellation ground station

He G L, Gao X, Sun L L, et al. A review of multibeam phased array antennas as LEO satellite constellation ground station. IEEE Access, 2021, 9: 147142-147154

2021
[157]

A digital multibeam array with wide scanning angle and enhanced beam gain for millimeter-wave massive MIMO applications

Hu Y, Hong W, Yu C, et al. A digital multibeam array with wide scanning angle and enhanced beam gain for millimeter-wave massive MIMO applications. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag, 2018, 66: 5827-5837

2018
[158]

Multibeam generation and measurement of a DDS-based digital beamforming array transmitter at Ka-band

Yu Y, Hong W, Jiang Z H, et al. Multibeam generation and measurement of a DDS-based digital beamforming array transmitter at Ka-band. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag, 2019, 67: 3030-3039

2019
[159]

A 16-element 4-beam 1 GHz IF 100 MHz bandwidth interleaved bit stream digital beamformer in 40 nm CMOS

Jang S, Jeong J, Lu R, et al. A 16-element 4-beam 1 GHz IF 100 MHz bandwidth interleaved bit stream digital beamformer in 40 nm CMOS. IEEE J Solid-State Circuits, 2018, 53: 1302-1312

2018
[160]

A Ka-band CMOS 4-beam phased-array receiver with symmetrical beam-distribution network

Peng N, Gu P, You X H, et al. A Ka-band CMOS 4-beam phased-array receiver with symmetrical beam-distribution network. IEEE Solid-State Circuits Lett, 2020, 3: 410-413

2020
[161]

Benefits of digital phased array radars

Talisa S H, O'Haver K W, Comberiate T M, et al. Benefits of digital phased array radars. Proc IEEE, 2016, 104: 530-543

2016
[162]

Hybrid digital and analog beamforming design for large-scale antenna arrays

Sohrabi F, Yu W. Hybrid digital and analog beamforming design for large-scale antenna arrays. IEEE J Sel Top Signal Process, 2016, 10: 501-513

2016
[163]

On the performance of fully-connected and sub-connected hybrid beamforming system

Wan S J, Zhu H B, Kang K, et al. On the performance of fully-connected and sub-connected hybrid beamforming system. IEEE Trans Veh Technol, 2021, 70: 11078-11082

2021
[164]

A mathematical theory of communication

Shannon C E. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J, 1948, 5: 379--423

1948
[165]

Progress and prospect of 6G wireless air-interface transmission technology research (in Chinese)

Yang G H, He G N, Chen R R, et al. Progress and prospect of 6G wireless air-interface transmission technology research (in Chinese). Sci China Inf Sci, 2024, 54: 1078--1113

2024
[166]

Algebraic codes for data transmission

Blahut R E. Algebraic codes for data transmission. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003

2003
[167]

Error bounds for convolutional codes and an asymptotically optimum decoding algorithm

Viterbi A. Error bounds for convolutional codes and an asymptotically optimum decoding algorithm. IEEE Trans Inf Theory, 1967, 13: 260--269

1967
[168]

Channel polarization: a method for constructing capacity-achieving codes for symmetric binary-input memoryless channels

Arikan E. Channel polarization: a method for constructing capacity-achieving codes for symmetric binary-input memoryless channels. IEEE Trans Inf Theory, 2009, 55: 3051--3073

2009
[169]

A practical approach to polar codes

Eslami A, Pishro-Nik H. A practical approach to polar codes. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory Proceedings, St. Petersburg, 2011. 16--20

2011
[170]

A novel puncturing scheme for polar codes

Wang R X, Liu R K. A novel puncturing scheme for polar codes. IEEE Commun Lett, 2014, 18: 2081--2084

2014
[171]

5G; NR; Multiplexing and channel coding (Release 15)

3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP). 5G; NR; Multiplexing and channel coding (Release 15). TS 38.212. https://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/archive/38\_series/38.212
[172]

Low-density parity-check codes

Gallager R. Low-density parity-check codes. IEEE Trans Inf Theory, 1962, 8: 21--28

1962
[173]

Near shannon limit error-correcting coding and decoding: turbo-codes

Berrou C, Glavieux A, Thitimajshima P. Near shannon limit error-correcting coding and decoding: turbo-codes. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Communications, Geneva, 1993. 1064--1070

1993
[174]

Construction of quasi-cyclic LDPC codes via masking with successive cycle elimination

Xu H Z, Feng D, Luo R, et al. Construction of quasi-cyclic LDPC codes via masking with successive cycle elimination. IEEE Commun Lett, 2016, 20: 2370--2373

2016
[175]

Synchronization and channel coding

CCSDS. Synchronization and channel coding. 131.0-B-2-S, 2011. https://public.ccsds.org/Pubs/131x0b2ec1s.pdf

2011
[176]

Spatially coupled sparse codes on graphs: theory and practice

Costello D, Dolecek L, Fuja T, et al. Spatially coupled sparse codes on graphs: theory and practice. IEEE Commun Mag, 2014, 52: 168--176

2014
[177]

Threshold saturation via spatial coupling: why convolutional LDPC ensembles perform so well over the BEC

Kudekar S, Richardson T J, Urbanke R L. Threshold saturation via spatial coupling: why convolutional LDPC ensembles perform so well over the BEC. IEEE Trans Inf Theory, 2011, 57: 803--834

2011
[178]

LDPC-staircase codes for soft decision decoding

Wijekoon V B, Viterbo E, Hong Y. LDPC-staircase codes for soft decision decoding. In: Proceedings of IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, Seoul, 2020. 1--6

2020
[179]

Time-varing periodic convolutional codes with low-density parity-check matrix

Felstrom J A, Zigangirov K S. Time-varing periodic convolutional codes with low-density parity-check matrix. IEEE Trans Inf Theory, 1999, 45: 2181--2191

1999
[180]

Spatially coupled LDPC codes constructed from protographs

Mithcell D G M, Lentmaier M, Costello D J. Spatially coupled LDPC codes constructed from protographs. IEEE Trans Inf Theory, 2015, 61: 4866--4889

2015
[181]

A partially coupled LDPC coded scheme for the Gaussian wiretap channel

Du J Y. A partially coupled LDPC coded scheme for the Gaussian wiretap channel. IEEE Commun Lett, 2020, 24: 7--10

2020
[182]

Soft OSD-sliding window decoding for staircase LDPC codes in deep space communications

Zhang Y S, Jiao J, Wang Y, et al. Soft OSD-sliding window decoding for staircase LDPC codes in deep space communications. In: Proceedings of IEEE/CIC International Conference on Communications in China, Dalian, 2023. 1-6

2023
[183]

Low complexity schemes for the random access Gaussian channel

Ordentlich O, Polyanskiy Y. Low complexity schemes for the random access Gaussian channel. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory, Aachen, 2017. 2528--2532

2017
[184]

A non-orthogonal multiple-access scheme using reliable physical-layer network coding and cascade-computation decoding

Yang T, Yang L, Guo Y J, et al. A non-orthogonal multiple-access scheme using reliable physical-layer network coding and cascade-computation decoding. Trans Wirel Commun, 2017, 16: 1633--1645

2017
[185]

Energy efficient coded random access for the wireless uplink

Kowshik S S, Andreev K, Frolov A, et al. Energy efficient coded random access for the wireless uplink. IEEE Trans Commun, 2020, 68: 4694--4708

2020
[186]

Nested linear/lattice codes for structured multiterminal binning

Zamir R, Shamai S, Erez U. Nested linear/lattice codes for structured multiterminal binning. IEEE Trans Inf Theory, 2002, 48: 1250--1276

2002
[187]

On the design of efficient lattice-code based multiple access

Yang T, Yu F T, Chen Q Z, et al. On the design of efficient lattice-code based multiple access. In: Proceedings of IEEE Global Communications Conference, Kuala Lumpur, 2023. 1--7

2023
[188]

List decoding of polar codes

Tal I, Vardy A. List decoding of polar codes. IEEE Trans Inf Theory, 2015, 61: 2213--2226

2015
[189]

CRC-aided decoding of polar codes

Niu K, Chen K. CRC-aided decoding of polar codes. IEEE Commun Lett, 2012, 16: 1668--1671

2012
[190]

Design of short polar codes for SCL decoding

Miloslavskaya V, Vucetic B. Design of short polar codes for SCL decoding. IEEE Trans Commun, 2020, 68: 6657--6668

2020
[191]

Reduced complexity iterative decoding of low-density parity check codes based on belief propagation

Fossorier M P, Mihaljevic M, Imai H. Reduced complexity iterative decoding of low-density parity check codes based on belief propagation. IEEE Trans Commun, 1999, 47: 673--680

1999
[192]

Design of high-performance and area-efficient decoder for 5G LDPC codes

Cui H X, Ghaffari F, Le K. Design of high-performance and area-efficient decoder for 5G LDPC codes. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst I Reg Papers, 2021, 68: 879--891

2021
[193]

Guessing noise, not code-words

Duffy K R, Li J, M \' e dard M. Guessing noise, not code-words. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory, Vail, 2018. 671--675

2018
[194]

Soft-decision decoding of linear block codes based on ordered statistics

Fossorier M P C, Lin S. Soft-decision decoding of linear block codes based on ordered statistics. IEEE Trans Inf Theory, 1995, 41: 1379--1396

1995
[195]

Ordered-statistics decoding with adaptive Gaussian elimination reduction for short codes

Yue C T, Shirvanimoghaddam M, Vucetic B, et al. Ordered-statistics decoding with adaptive Gaussian elimination reduction for short codes. In: Proceedings of IEEE Global Communication Conference Workshops, Rio de Janeiro, 2022. 492--497

2022
[196]

A low-complexity ordered statistic decoding of short block codes

Liang J F, Wang Y W, Cai S H, et al. A low-complexity ordered statistic decoding of short block codes. IEEE Commun Lett, 2023, 2: 400-403

2023
[197]

Segmentation discarding ordered-statistic decoding for linear block codes

Yue C T, Shirvanimoghaddam M, Li Y, et al. Segmentation discarding ordered-statistic decoding for linear block codes. In: Proceedings of IEEE Global Communication Conference, Waikoloa, 2019. 1--6

2019
[198]

Probability-based ordered-statistics decoding for short block codes

Yue C T, Shirvanimoghaddam M, Park G, et al. Probability-based ordered-statistics decoding for short block codes. IEEE Commun Lett, 2021, 25: 1791--1795

2021
[199]

Improving belief propagation list decoding of polar codes by post-processing

Urman Y, Mogilevsky G, Burshtein D. Improving belief propagation list decoding of polar codes by post-processing. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory, Espoo, 2022. 2571--2576

2022
[200]

Sparse code multiple access

Nikopourand H, Baligh H. Sparse code multiple access. In: Proceedings of IIEEE Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications, London, 2013. 332--336

2013
[201]

Beyond integer-forcing receiver for lattice-code based multi-user MIMO system

Yang T. Beyond integer-forcing receiver for lattice-code based multi-user MIMO system. IEEE Commun Lett, 2023, 27: 2553--2557

2023
[202]

Code-domain collision resolution grant-free random access for massive access in IoT

Rao Z G, Jiao J, Wang Y, et al. Code-domain collision resolution grant-free random access for massive access in IoT. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun, 2023, 22: 4611-4624

2023
[203]

Compressive-sensing-based grant-free massive access for 6G massive communication

Gao Z, Ke M L, Mei Y K, et al. Compressive-sensing-based grant-free massive access for 6G massive communication. IEEE Internet Things J, 2024, 1: 7411-7435

2024
[204]

Location-based timing advance estimation for 5G integrated LEO satellite communications

Wang W J, Chen T T, Ding R, et al. Location-based timing advance estimation for 5G integrated LEO satellite communications. IEEE Trans Veh Technol, 2021, 70: 6002-6017

2021
[205]

IEEE Trans Commun, 2021, 69: 276-290

Yu N Y, Binary Golay spreading sequences and Reed-Muller codes for uplink grant-free NOMA. IEEE Trans Commun, 2021, 69: 276-290

2021
[206]

Joint activity and data detection for massive grant-free access using deterministic non-orthogonal signatures

Yu N Y, Yu W. Joint activity and data detection for massive grant-free access using deterministic non-orthogonal signatures. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun, 2024, 23: 9474-9487

2024
[207]

Composite preambles based on differential phase rotations for grant-free random access systems

Wang Y, Xu W J, Juntti M, et al. Composite preambles based on differential phase rotations for grant-free random access systems. IEEE Internet Things J, 2023, 10: 17035-17046

2023
[208]

Pilot sequences with low coherence and PAPR for grant-free massive access

Qi T, Lyu B, Hoang D T. Pilot sequences with low coherence and PAPR for grant-free massive access. IEEE Wirel Commun Lett, 2023, 12(7): 1254--1258

2023
[209]

Low-correlation superimposed pilot grant-free massive access for satellite Internet of things

Xu L, Jiao J, Wang Y, et al. Low-correlation superimposed pilot grant-free massive access for satellite Internet of things. IEEE Trans Commun, 2023, 71(12): 7087--7101

2023
[210]

Pilot-based unsourced random access with a massive MIMO receiver, interference cancellation, and power control

Fengler A, Musa O, Jung P, et al. Pilot-based unsourced random access with a massive MIMO receiver, interference cancellation, and power control. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun, 2022, 40(5): 1522--1534

2022
[211]

User activity detection and channel estimation for grant-free random access in LEO satellite-enabled Internet of things

Zhang Z J, Li Y, Huang C W, et al. User activity detection and channel estimation for grant-free random access in LEO satellite-enabled Internet of things. IEEE Internet Things J, 2020, 7: 8811-8825

2020
[212]

Active terminal identification, channel estimation, and signal detection for grant-free NOMA-OTFS in LEO satellite Internet-of-things

Zhou X Y, Ying K K, Gao Z, et al. Active terminal identification, channel estimation, and signal detection for grant-free NOMA-OTFS in LEO satellite Internet-of-things. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun, 2023, 22: 2847-2866

2023
[213]

Joint user identification, channel estimation and data Detection for grant-free NOMA in LEO satellite communications

Zhang C, Liu Y S, Hu J, et al. Joint user identification, channel estimation and data Detection for grant-free NOMA in LEO satellite communications. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun, 2024. doi: 10.1109/JSAC.2024.3460059

2024
[214]

AFDM-SCMA: A promising waveform for massive connectivity over high mobility channels

Luo Q, Xiao P, Liu Z L, et al. AFDM-SCMA: A promising waveform for massive connectivity over high mobility channels. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun, 2024, 23: 14421-14436

2024
[215]

LEO satellite-enabled random access with large differential delay and Doppler shift

Shen B X, Wu Y P, Zhang W J, et al. LEO satellite-enabled random access with large differential delay and Doppler shift. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun, 2025, pages: 1--1

2025
[216]

A survey on random access protocols in direct-access LEO satellite-based IoT communication

Le T T T, Hassan N U, Chen X M, et al. A survey on random access protocols in direct-access LEO satellite-based IoT communication. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials, 2025, 27(1): 426--462

2025
[217]

Real-time status: How often should one update?

Kaul S, Yates R, Gruteser M. Real-time status: How often should one update?. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Communications, Orlando, 2012, 2731-2735

2012
[218]

Grant free age-optimal random access protocol for satellite-based Internet of things

Yang T, Jiao J, Wu S H, Lu R X, et al. Grant free age-optimal random access protocol for satellite-based Internet of things. IEEE Trans Commun, 2022, 70(6): 3947-3961

2022
[219]

Unequal timeliness protection massive access for mission critical communications in S-IoT

Su S Y, Jiao J, Yang T, et al. Unequal timeliness protection massive access for mission critical communications in S-IoT. IEEE Trans Commun, 2024, 72(6): 3211--3226

2024
[220]

Multisatellite cooperative random access scheme in low Earth orbit satellite networks

Zhao B, Ren G L, Zhang H N. Multisatellite cooperative random access scheme in low Earth orbit satellite networks. IEEE Syst J, 2019, 13: 2617--2628

2019
[221]

Quasi-synchronous random access for massive MIMO-based LEO satellite constellations

Ying K K, Gao Z, Chen S, et al. Quasi-synchronous random access for massive MIMO-based LEO satellite constellations. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun, 2023, 41: 1702-1722

2023
[222]

A survey on non-orthogonal multiple access for 5G networks: Research challenges and future trends

Ding Z G, Lei X F, Karagiannidis G.K, et al. A survey on non-orthogonal multiple access for 5G networks: Research challenges and future trends. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun, 2017, 35: 2181-2195

2017
[223]

Network utility maximization resource allocation for NOMA in satellite-based Internet of Things

Jiao J, Sun Y Y, Wu S H, et al. Network utility maximization resource allocation for NOMA in satellite-based Internet of Things. IEEE Internet Things J, 2020, 7: 3230-3242

2020
[224]

A survey of Non-Orthogonal multiple access for 5G

Dai L L, Wang B C, Ding Z G, et al. A survey of Non-Orthogonal multiple access for 5G. IEEE Commun Surv Tut, 2018, 20: 2294-2323

2018
[225]

On the spectral efficiency and security enhancements of NOMA assisted multicast-unicast streaming

Ding Z G, Zhao Z Y, Peng M G, et al. On the spectral efficiency and security enhancements of NOMA assisted multicast-unicast streaming. IEEE Trans Commun, 2017, 65: 3151-3163

2017
[226]

Energy efficient user clustering, hybrid precoding and power optimization in Terahertz MIMO-NOMA systems

Zhang H J, Zhang H S, Liu W, et al. Energy efficient user clustering, hybrid precoding and power optimization in Terahertz MIMO-NOMA systems. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun, 2020, 38: 2074-2085

2020
[227]

Sub-channel assignment, power allocation, and user scheduling for non-orthogonal multiple access networks

Di B Y, Song L Y, Li Y H. Sub-channel assignment, power allocation, and user scheduling for non-orthogonal multiple access networks. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun, 2016, 15: 7686-7698

2016
[228]

Age of incorrect information minimization for semantic-empowered NOMA system in S-IoT

Hong H, Jiao J, Yang T, et al. Age of incorrect information minimization for semantic-empowered NOMA system in S-IoT. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun, 2024, 23: 6639-6652

2024
[229]

Satellite communications in the new space era: A survey and future challenges

Kodheli O, Lagunas E, Maturo N, et al. Satellite communications in the new space era: A survey and future challenges. IEEE Commun Surv Tut, 2020, 23: 70-109

2020
[230]

Non-orthogonal transmission techniques for multibeam satellite systems

Perez-Neira A I, Caus M, Vazquez M A. Non-orthogonal transmission techniques for multibeam satellite systems. IEEE Commun Mag, 2019, 57: 58-63

2019
[231]

Robust design for integrated satellite-terrestrial Internet of Things

Chu J H, Chen X M. Robust design for integrated satellite-terrestrial Internet of Things. IEEE Internet Things J, 2021, 57: 9072-9083

2021
[232]

Joint beamforming and power allocation for satellite-terrestrial integrated networks with non-orthogonal multiple access

Lin Z, Lin M, Wang J-B, et al. Joint beamforming and power allocation for satellite-terrestrial integrated networks with non-orthogonal multiple access. IEEE J Sel Top Signal Process, 2019, 13: 657-670

2019
[233]

Spectrum sharing for 6G integrated satellite-terrestrial communication networks based on NOMA and CR

Liu X, Lam K Y, Li F, et al. Spectrum sharing for 6G integrated satellite-terrestrial communication networks based on NOMA and CR. IEEE Netw, 2021, 35: 28-34

2021
[234]

Age-optimal downlink NOMA resource allocation for satellite-based IoT network

Jiao J, Hong H, Wang Y, et al. Age-optimal downlink NOMA resource allocation for satellite-based IoT network. IEEE Trans Veh Technol, 2023, 72: 211575-11589

2023
[235]

Dynamic resource allocation for multi-satellite cooperation networks: A decentralized scheme under statistical CSI

Zhao M H, Yu H X, Pan J X, et al. Dynamic resource allocation for multi-satellite cooperation networks: A decentralized scheme under statistical CSI. IEEE Access, 2024, 12: 15419-15437

2024
[236]

Multi-satellite cooperative communication: Exploiting time asynchrony in non-orthogonal transmissions

Zhao M H, Ye N, Ouyang Q L, et al. Multi-satellite cooperative communication: Exploiting time asynchrony in non-orthogonal transmissions. IEEE Trans Veh Technol, 2023, 72: 6868-6873

2023
[237]

Deep learning-based sum data rate and energy efficiency optimization for MIMO-NOMA systems

Huang H J, Yang Y C, Ding Z G, et al. Deep learning-based sum data rate and energy efficiency optimization for MIMO-NOMA systems. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun, 2020, 19(8): 5373--5388

2020
[238]

A study on the optimality of downlink hybrid NOMA

Ding Z G. A study on the optimality of downlink hybrid NOMA. IEEE Signal Process Lett, 2025, 32: 511--515

2025
[239]

Spectral-efficient downlink systems under imperfect SIC and CSI: MC-NOMA or partial NOMA? IEEE Wirel Commun Lett, 2024, 13(1): 133--137

Katwe M, Singh K, Li C P, et al. Spectral-efficient downlink systems under imperfect SIC and CSI: MC-NOMA or partial NOMA? IEEE Wirel Commun Lett, 2024, 13(1): 133--137

2024
[240]

Active RIS-aided EH-NOMA networks: A deep reinforcement learning approach

Shi Z Y, Lu H B, Xie X Z, et al. Active RIS-aided EH-NOMA networks: A deep reinforcement learning approach. IEEE Trans Commun, 2023, 71(10): 5846--5861

2023
[241]

Resource allocation design for spectral-efficient URLLC using RIS-aided FD-NOMA system

Deshpande R, Katwe M V, Singh K, et al. Resource allocation design for spectral-efficient URLLC using RIS-aided FD-NOMA system. IEEE Wirel Commun Lett, 2023, 12(7): 1209--1213

2023
[242]

Rate-splitting multiple access: Fundamentals, survey, and future research trends

Mao Y J, Dizdar O, Clerckx B, et al. Rate-splitting multiple access: Fundamentals, survey, and future research trends. IEEE Commun Surv Tut, 2022, 24: 2073-2126

2022
[243]

Rate-splitting multiple access for downlink multiuser MIMO: Precoder optimization and PHY-layer design

Mishra A, Mao Y J, Dizdar O, Clerckx, B. Rate-splitting multiple access for downlink multiuser MIMO: Precoder optimization and PHY-layer design. IEEE Trans Commun, 2021, 70: 874-890

2021
[244]

Rate-splitting multiple access for downlink multi-antenna communications: Physical layer design and link-level simulations

Dizdar O, Mao Y J, Han W, et al. Rate-splitting multiple access for downlink multi-antenna communications: Physical layer design and link-level simulations. In: Proceedings of IEEE Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, London, 2020. 1-6

2020
[245]

Rate-splitting multiple access and its interplay with intelligent reflecting surfaces

de Sena A S, Nardelli P H J, da Costa D B, et al. Rate-splitting multiple access and its interplay with intelligent reflecting surfaces. IEEE Commun Mag, 2022, 60: 52-57

2022
[246]

Rate-splitting multiple access for multi-antenna broadcast channels with statistical CSIT

Yin L F, Clerckx B, Mao Y J. Rate-splitting multiple access for multi-antenna broadcast channels with statistical CSIT. In: Proceedings of IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference Workshops, Nanjing, 2021. 1-6

2021
[247]

RIS-IoE for data-driven networks: New mentalities, trends and preliminary solutions

Zhuo B T, Gu J P, Duan W, et al. RIS-IoE for data-driven networks: New mentalities, trends and preliminary solutions. IEEE Internet Things Mag, 2023, 6: 102-107

2023
[248]

Deep reinforcement learning based resource allocation for RSMA in LEO satellite-terrestrial networks

Huang J F, Yang Y, Lee J, et al. Deep reinforcement learning based resource allocation for RSMA in LEO satellite-terrestrial networks. IEEE Trans Commun, 2024, 72: 1341-1354

2024
[249]

Distributed rate-splitting multiple access for multilayer satellite communications

Xu Y N, Yin L F, Mao Y J, et al. Distributed rate-splitting multiple access for multilayer satellite communications. IEEE Trans Commun, 2024, 72: 6131-6144

2024
[250]

rate splitting for MIMO multibeam satellite systems

Vazquez M, Caus M, Perez-Neira A. rate splitting for MIMO multibeam satellite systems. In: Proceedings of International ITG Workshop on Smart Antennas, Bochum, 2018. 1-6

2018
[251]

Rate-splitting multiple access for multigateway multibeam satellite systems with feeder link interference

Si Z W, Yin L F, Clerckx B. Rate-splitting multiple access for multigateway multibeam satellite systems with feeder link interference. IEEE Trans Commun, 2022, 70: 2147-2162

2022
[252]

Space-air-ground integrated network: A survey

Liu J J, Shi Y P, Fadlullah Z M. Space-air-ground integrated network: A survey. IEEE Commun Surv Tut, 2018, 20: 27-14

2018
[253]

Transmission control protocol (TCP) in wireless networks: Issues, approaches, and challenges

Leung K-C, Li V O K. Transmission control protocol (TCP) in wireless networks: Issues, approaches, and challenges. IEEE Commun Surv Tut, 2006, 8: 64--79

2006
[254]

Overview of space communications protocols, report concerning space data system standards

CCSDS. Overview of space communications protocols, report concerning space data system standards. 130.0-G-2, 2007. https://public.ccsds.org/Pubs/130x0g2s.pdf

2007
[255]

A delay-tolerant network architecture for challenged Internets

Fall K. A delay-tolerant network architecture for challenged Internets. In: Proceedings of ACM Conference on Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communications, Karlsruhe, 2003. 27-34

2003
[256]

Licklider Transmission Protocol-Specification

Burleigh S, Ramadas M, Farrell S. Licklider Transmission Protocol-Specification. IETF RFC 5325, 2008. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5325

2008
[257]

Integration of Reed-Solomon codes to licklider transmission protocol (LTP) for space DTN

Shi L L, Jiao J, Sabbagh A, et al. Integration of Reed-Solomon codes to licklider transmission protocol (LTP) for space DTN. IEEE Aerosp Electron Syst Mag, 2017, 32: 48--55

2017
[258]

A throughput model of TCP-FSO/ADFR for free-space optical satellite communications

Hasegawa Y, Ito T, Ono Y, et al. A throughput model of TCP-FSO/ADFR for free-space optical satellite communications. In: Proceedings of IEEE Global Communications Conference, Waikoloa, 2019. 1--6

2019
[259]

Design and analysis of sliding window ARQ protocols with rate adaptation for burst transmission over FSO turbulence channels

Le H D, Mai V V, Nguyen C T, et al. Design and analysis of sliding window ARQ protocols with rate adaptation for burst transmission over FSO turbulence channels. J Opt Commun Netw, 2019, 11: 151--163

2019
[260]

A survey and tutorial on low

Chen H, Maunder G R, Hanzo L. A survey and tutorial on low
[261]

Optimizing the code rate of energy-constrained wireless communications with HARQ

Rosas F, Souza R D, Pellenz M E, et al. Optimizing the code rate of energy-constrained wireless communications with HARQ. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun, 2016, 15: 191--205

2016
[262]

HARQ buffer management: An information-theoretic view

Lee W, Simeone O, Kang J, et al. HARQ buffer management: An information-theoretic view. IEEE Trans Commun, 2015, 63: 4539--4550

2015
[263]

Hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) in wireless communications systems and standards: A contemporary survey

Ahmed A, Al-Dweik A, Iraqi Y, et al. Hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) in wireless communications systems and standards: A contemporary survey. IEEE Commun Surv Tut, 2021, 23: 2711--2752

2021
[264]

Fast HARQ over finite block length codes: A technique for low-latency reliable communication

Makki B, Svensson T, Caire G, et al. Fast HARQ over finite block length codes: A technique for low-latency reliable communication. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun, 2019, 18: 194--209

2019
[265]

Dynamic HARQ with guaranteed delay

Shirvanimoghaddam M, Khayami H, Li Y. Dynamic HARQ with guaranteed delay. In: Proceedings of IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, Seoul, 2020. 1--6

2020
[266]

Enabling early HARQ feedback in 5G networks

Berardinelli G, Khosravirad S R, Pedersen K I, et al. Enabling early HARQ feedback in 5G networks. In: Proceedings of IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, Nanjing, 2016. 1--5

2016
[267]

Enhanced machine learning techniques for early HARQ feedback prediction in 5G

Strodthoff N, G \" o ktepe B, Schierl T, et al. Enhanced machine learning techniques for early HARQ feedback prediction in 5G. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun, 2109, 37: 2573--2587
[268]

Erasure correcting codes for use in near-earth and deep-space communications

CCSDS. Erasure correcting codes for use in near-earth and deep-space communications. 131.5-O-1, 2014. https://public.ccsds.org/Pubs/1 31x 5o1.pdf

2014
[269]

IEEE Commun Mag, 2019, 57: 130--137

Shirvanimoghaddam M, et al., Short block-length codes for ultra-reliable low latency communications. IEEE Commun Mag, 2019, 57: 130--137

2019
[270]

LT codes

Luby M. LT codes. In: Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, Vancouver, 2002. 271-280

2002
[271]

Raptor codes

Shokrollahi A. Raptor codes. IEEE Trans Inf Theory, 2006, 21: 2551--2567

2006
[272]

Technical specification group services and system aspects; Multimedia broadcast/multicast service (MBMS); Protocols and codecs (Release 6)

3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP). Technical specification group services and system aspects; Multimedia broadcast/multicast service (MBMS); Protocols and codecs (Release 6). TS 26.346. https://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/archive/26\_series/26.346
[273]

Rateless feedback codes

S rensen J H, Koike-Akino T, Orlik P. Rateless feedback codes. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory, Cambridge, 2012. 1767--1771

2012
[274]

Distributed systematic Raptor coding scheme in deep space communications (in Chinese)

Jiao J, Nie S X, Yang Y, et al. Distributed systematic Raptor coding scheme in deep space communications (in Chinese). J Astronaut, 2016, 37: 1232-1238

2016
[275]

A random linear network coding approach to multicast

Ho T, Medard M, Koetter R, et al. A random linear network coding approach to multicast. IEEE Trans Inf Theory, 2006, 52: 4413-4430

2006
[276]

Reliability of multicast under random linear network coding

Tsimbalo E, Tassi A, Piechocki R J. Reliability of multicast under random linear network coding. IEEE Trans Commun, 2018, 66: 2547-2559

2018
[277]

Batched Sparse Codes

Yang S H, Yeung R W. Batched Sparse Codes. IEEE Trans Inf Theory, 2014, 60: 5322-5346

2014
[278]

Energy efficient network coded HARQ transmission scheme for S-IoT

Jiao J, Ni Z N, Wu S H, et al. Energy efficient network coded HARQ transmission scheme for S-IoT. IEEE Trans Green Commun Netw, 2021, 5: 308-321

2021
[279]

Age-optimal network coding HARQ transmission scheme for dual-hop satellite-integrated Internet

Jiao J, Liu S Q, Ding J, et al. Age-optimal network coding HARQ transmission scheme for dual-hop satellite-integrated Internet. IEEE Trans Veh Technol, 2022, 71: 10666-10682

2022
[280]

Age-optimal network coding HARQ scheme for satellite-based Internet of things

Ding J, Jiao J, Huang J H, et al. Age-optimal network coding HARQ scheme for satellite-based Internet of things. IEEE Internet Things J, 2022, 9: 21984-21998

2022
[281]

Age-critical long erasure coding-CCSDS file delivery protocol for dual-hop S-IoT

Huang J H, Jiao J, Wang Y, et al. Age-critical long erasure coding-CCSDS file delivery protocol for dual-hop S-IoT. IEEE Internet Things J, 2023, 10: 17070-17084

2023
[282]

Towards age-optimal transmission in satellite-integrated IoT: A two-layer coding approach

Li D Q, Wu S H, Jiao J, et al. Towards age-optimal transmission in satellite-integrated IoT: A two-layer coding approach. IEEE Trans Veh Technol, 2023, 72: 1137-1148

2023
[283]

Throughput analysis for TCP over the FSO-based satellite-assisted Internet of vehicles

Le H D, Trinh P V, Pham T V, et al. Throughput analysis for TCP over the FSO-based satellite-assisted Internet of vehicles. IEEE Trans Veh Technol, 2022, 71: 1875-1890

2022
[284]

A high-throughput cooperative network coding HARQ transmission scheme for integrated satellite-terrestrial networks

Hu C B, Yang H J, Li B, et al. A high-throughput cooperative network coding HARQ transmission scheme for integrated satellite-terrestrial networks. In: Proceedings of IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, Hong Kong, 2023. 1-5

2023
[285]

On the performance of NOMA with hybrid ARQ

Cai D H, Ding Z G, Fan P Z, et al. On the performance of NOMA with hybrid ARQ. IEEE Trans Veh Technol, 2018, 67: 10033-10038

2018
[286]

Achievable diversity order of HARQ-aided downlink NOMA systems

Shi Z, Zhang C M, Fu Y R, et al. Achievable diversity order of HARQ-aided downlink NOMA systems. IEEE Trans Veh Technol, 2020, 69: 471-487

2020
[287]

Performance analysis and optimization of NOMA with HARQ for short packet communications in Massive IoT

Ghanami F, Hodtani G A, Vucetic B, et al. Performance analysis and optimization of NOMA with HARQ for short packet communications in Massive IoT. IEEE Internet Things J, 2021, 8: 4736-4748

2021
[288]

Block error performance of NOMA with HARQ-CC in finite blocklength

Marasinghe D, Rajatheva N, Latva-Aho M. Block error performance of NOMA with HARQ-CC in finite blocklength. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference Communications Workshops, Dublin, 2020, 1-6

2020
[289]

Minimizing age-of-information in HARQ-CC aided NOMA systems

Wu S H, Deng Z H, Li A M, et al. Minimizing age-of-information in HARQ-CC aided NOMA systems. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun, 2023, 22: 1072-1086

2023
[290]

Deep reinforcement learning-assisted age-optimal transmission policy for HARQ-aided NOMA networks

Liu K P, Li A M, Wu S H. Deep reinforcement learning-assisted age-optimal transmission policy for HARQ-aided NOMA networks. In: Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops, Hoboken, 2023. 1-6

2023
[291]

u nd \" u z D, Gy \

Ceran E T, G \" u nd \" u z D, Gy \" o rgy A. A reinforcement learning approach to age of information in multi-user networks with HARQ. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun, 2021, 39: 1412--1426

2021
[292]

Multi-source AoI-constrained resource minimization under HARQ: Heterogeneous sampling processes

Vilni S S, Moltafet M, Leinonen M. Multi-source AoI-constrained resource minimization under HARQ: Heterogeneous sampling processes. IEEE Trans Veh Technol, 2024, 73: 1084--1099

2024
[293]

Space-air-ground FSO networks for high-throughput satellite communications

Samy R, Yang H-C, Rakia T, Alouini M-S. Space-air-ground FSO networks for high-throughput satellite communications. IEEE Commun Mag, 2022, 60: 82-87

2022
[294]

A survey on nongeostationary satellite systems: The communication perspective

Al-Hraishawi H, et al. A survey on nongeostationary satellite systems: The communication perspective. IEEE Commun Surv Tut, 2023, 25: 101--132

2023
[295]

Link-layer retransmission-based error-control protocols in FSO communications: A survey

Le H D, Pham A T. Link-layer retransmission-based error-control protocols in FSO communications: A survey. IEEE Commun Surv Tut, 2022, 24(3): 1602-1633

2022
[296]

Structured satellite-UAV-terrestrial networks for 6G Internet of Things

Feng W, Wang Y M, Chen Y F, et al. Structured satellite-UAV-terrestrial networks for 6G Internet of Things. IEEE Netw, 2024, 38(4): 48--54

2024
[297]

A review of wireless communication using high-altitude platforms for extended coverage and capacity

Arum S C, Grace D, Mitchell P D. A review of wireless communication using high-altitude platforms for extended coverage and capacity. Computer Communications, 2020, 157: 232-256

2020
[298]

A survey on acquisition, tracking, and pointing mechanisms for mobile free-space optical communications

Kaymak Y, Rojas-Cessa R, Feng J H, Ansari N, et al. A survey on acquisition, tracking, and pointing mechanisms for mobile free-space optical communications. IEEE Commun Surv Tut, 2018, 20(2): 1104-1123

2018
[299]

Pointing-and-acquisition for optical wireless in 6G: From algorithms to performance evaluation

Moon H-J, Chae C-B, Wong K-K, Alouini M-S. Pointing-and-acquisition for optical wireless in 6G: From algorithms to performance evaluation. IEEE Commun Mag, 2024, 62(3): 32-38

2024
[300]

Inter-spacecraft omnidirectional optical communicator for swarms

Velazco J E, Wernicke D, Griffin J, et al. Inter-spacecraft omnidirectional optical communicator for swarms. In: Proceedings of Annual AIAA/USU Conference, 2019

2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Reference title

Author A, Author B, Author C. Reference title. Journal, 2024, 38: 13--28

2024

[2] [2]

Towards 6G wireless communication networks: Vision, enabling technologies, and new paradigm shifts

You X H, Wang C-X, Huang J, et al. Towards 6G wireless communication networks: Vision, enabling technologies, and new paradigm shifts. Sci China Inf Sci, 2021, 64: 110301

2021

[3] [3]

Semantic-aware coordinated transmission in cohesive clustered satellites: Utility of information perspective

Xu L, Jiao J, Jiang S Y, et al. Semantic-aware coordinated transmission in cohesive clustered satellites: Utility of information perspective. Sci China Inf Sci, 2024, 67: 199301

2024

[4] [4]

Integration of data center into the distributed satellite cluster networks: Challenges, techniques, and trends

Peng C, He Y Z, Zhao S H, et al. Integration of data center into the distributed satellite cluster networks: Challenges, techniques, and trends. IEEE Netw, 2023, 37: 52-58

2023

[5] [5]

A survey on technologies, standards and open challenges in satellite IoT

Centenaro M, Costa C E, Granelli F, et al. A survey on technologies, standards and open challenges in satellite IoT. IEEE Commun Surv Tut, 2021, 23: 1693-1720

2021

[6] [6]

Spatial ultra-sparse distributed antenna satellite-ground cooperative transmission architecture: Challenges, key technologies, and trends

He Y Z, Wang C X, Qi C W, et al. Spatial ultra-sparse distributed antenna satellite-ground cooperative transmission architecture: Challenges, key technologies, and trends. IEEE Commun Mag, 2024, 62: 136-143

2024

[7] [7]

5G-Advanced: network-controlled repeater (in Chinese)

Zhang N, Li Z Y, Li R Y, et al. 5G-Advanced: network-controlled repeater (in Chinese). Telecommun Sci, 2022, 38: 169-176

2022

[8] [8]

Satellite swarm-based antenna arrays for 6G direct-to-cell connectivity

Tuzi D, Delamotte T, Knopp A. Satellite swarm-based antenna arrays for 6G direct-to-cell connectivity. IEEE Access, 2023, 11: 36907--36928

2023