REVIEW 2 cited by
Seeking Consistent Flat Minima for Better Domain Generalization via Refining Loss Landscapes
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Domain generalization aims to learn a model from multiple training domains and generalize it to unseen test domains. Recent theory has shown that seeking the deep models, whose parameters lie in the flat minima of the loss landscape, can significantly reduce the out-of-domain generalization error. However, existing methods often neglect the consistency of loss landscapes in different domains, resulting in models that are not simultaneously in the optimal flat minima in all domains, which limits their generalization ability. To address this issue, this paper proposes an iterative Self-Feedback Training (SFT) framework to seek consistent flat minima that are shared across different domains by progressively refining loss landscapes during training. It alternatively generates a feedback signal by measuring the inconsistency of loss landscapes in different domains and refines these loss landscapes for greater consistency using this feedback signal. Benefiting from the consistency of the flat minima within these refined loss landscapes, our SFT helps achieve better out-of-domain generalization. Extensive experiments on DomainBed demonstrate superior performances of SFT when compared to state-of-the-art sharpness-aware methods and other prevalent DG baselines. On average across five DG benchmarks, SFT surpasses the sharpness-aware minimization by 2.6% with ResNet-50 and 1.5% with ViT-B/16, respectively. The code will be available soon.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
A Risk Decomposition Framework for Pre-Hoc Fine-Tuning Prediction
Formulates pre-hoc fine-tuning prediction as stochastic estimation, proves lower bound on optimization variance decay rate, and introduces a three-regime predictability phase diagram.
-
TuneAhead: Predicting Fine-tuning Performance Before Full Training Begins
TUNEAHEAD predicts fine-tuning performance from meta-features and short probes, reporting RMSE 1.47 and 95.1% of predictions within 3 points on 370 held-out runs of Qwen2.5-7B.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.