pith. sign in

arxiv: 2412.14250 · v3 · submitted 2024-12-18 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.mes-hall· cond-mat.quant-gas· hep-lat· hep-th

Metric-induced non-Hermitian physics

Pasquale Marra This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 06:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.quant-gashep-lathep-th
keywords Dirac equationcurved spacetimepseudo-Hermitian HamiltonianPT symmetrynon-Hermitian skin effectmetric renormalizationlattice regularizationnon-Hermitian physics
0
0 comments X

The pith

Renormalizing the Dirac field by the metric determinant and discretizing on a lattice produces a pseudo-Hermitian Hamiltonian for static diagonal metrics.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper examines the hermiticity of the Dirac equation in curved spacetime by rescaling the field with a factor tied to the metric determinant instead of adding extra terms. After lattice regularization, time-independent diagonal or conformally flat coordinates yield a pseudo-Hermitian, PT-symmetric Hamiltonian whose spectrum is entirely real and whose evolution remains unitary. Time dependence in the metric breaks the pseudo-Hermiticity and produces nonunitary dynamics with local gain or loss, while space dependence generates the non-Hermitian skin effect with boundary accumulation of states. Curvature gradients are shown to act as an imaginary gauge field that drives these effects, framing non-Hermitian quantum behavior as a geometric consequence of the spacetime metric.

Core claim

For time-independent and diagonal (or conformally flat) coordinates, the Dirac equation returns a pseudo-Hermitian (i.e., PT-symmetric) Hamiltonian when the field is renormalized by a scaling function related to the determinant of the metric and then properly regularized on the lattice. The PT-symmetry remains unbroken, ensuring a real energy spectrum and unitary time evolution. Time-dependent spacetime coordinates break pseudohermiticity and yield non-Hermitian Hamiltonians with nonunitary evolution, while space-dependent coordinates produce the non-Hermitian skin effect. Curvature gradients induce an imaginary gauge field that corresponds to a drift force pushing eigenmodes to boundaries (

What carries the argument

Renormalization of the Dirac field by a scaling function related to the determinant of the metric, followed by lattice regularization

If this is right

  • Time-independent diagonal metrics give unbroken PT symmetry and real spectra with unitary evolution.
  • Time-dependent metrics produce non-Hermitian Hamiltonians whose evolution is nonunitary due to local gain and loss processes.
  • Space-dependent metrics induce the non-Hermitian skin effect with states accumulating at boundaries.
  • Curvature gradients act as imaginary gauge fields that drive spatial or temporal drifts of the probability density.
  • Non-Hermitian phenomena are thereby placed in a unified geometric framework with spacetime deformations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The geometric framing may allow construction of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians by deforming the metric in analog-gravity or metamaterial systems.
  • A duality between metric deformations and non-Hermitian phases could classify such phases by their associated curvature signatures.
  • The approach might extend to higher-dimensional or fermionic-interacting cases to predict new metric-controlled many-body skin effects or gain-loss dynamics.
  • Testing the lattice-to-continuum limit for a concrete curved metric would directly check whether the claimed pseudo-Hermiticity survives discretization artifacts.

Load-bearing premise

Renormalizing the Dirac field with a scaling function from the metric determinant is the right way to restore hermiticity without extra terms, and lattice regularization faithfully reproduces the continuum pseudo-Hermiticity or non-Hermiticity.

What would settle it

Numerical diagonalization of the lattice Hamiltonian for any explicit time-independent diagonal metric (for example a 1D reduction of Schwarzschild) that produces even one complex eigenvalue would falsify the unbroken PT symmetry.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.14250 by Pasquale Marra.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Local density of states (LDOS) of time-independent lattice Hamiltonians corresponding to the Dirac equation in curved and static [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Local density of states (LDOS) on the real and imaginary axes of time-dependent and nonhermitian lattice Hamiltonian corresponding [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The duality between the unitary evolution of the field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

I consider the longstanding issue of the hermiticity of the Dirac equation in curved spacetime. Instead of imposing hermiticity by adding ad hoc terms, I renormalize the field by a scaling function, which is related to the determinant of the metric, and then regularize the renormalized field on a discrete lattice. I found that, for time-independent and diagonal (or conformally flat) coordinates, the Dirac equation returns a pseudo-Hermitian (i.e., PT-symmetric) Hamiltonian when properly regularized on the lattice. Notably, the PT-symmetry is unbroken, ensuring a real energy spectrum and unitary time evolution. This establishes stringent conditions for the existence of complex spectra in 1D non-Hermitian (NH) models. Conversely, time-dependent spacetime coordinates break pseudohermiticity, yielding NH Hamiltonians with nonunitary time evolution. Similarly, space-dependent coordinates lead to the NH skin effect (NHSE), i.e., the accumulation of localized states on the boundaries. Arguably, these NH effects are physical: time dependence leads to local gain and loss processes and nonunitary growth or decay. Conversely, space dependence leads to the NHSE with spatial decay of the fields in a preferential direction. In other words, the curvature gradients induce an imaginary gauge field, corresponding to a drift force acting in space and time, pushing the eigenmodes to the boundaries or forcing their probability density to increase or decrease over time. Hence, temporal curvature gradients produce nonunitary gain or loss, while spatial curvature gradients correspond to the NHSE, allowing for the description of these two phenomena in a unified framework. This also suggests a duality between NH physics and spacetime deformations, framing NH physics in purely geometric terms. This metric-induced nonhermiticity unveils an unexpected connection between the spacetime metric and NH phases of matter.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript addresses the hermiticity of the Dirac equation in curved spacetime by renormalizing the Dirac field with a scaling function tied to the metric determinant √|g|, followed by lattice regularization. For time-independent diagonal or conformally flat coordinates, the resulting Hamiltonian is pseudo-Hermitian (PT-symmetric) with unbroken PT symmetry, yielding real spectra and unitary evolution. This imposes conditions on complex spectra in 1D non-Hermitian models. Time-dependent metrics produce non-Hermitian Hamiltonians with nonunitary evolution, while space-dependent metrics induce the non-Hermitian skin effect via curvature gradients acting as imaginary gauge fields. The work frames these NH effects geometrically and suggests a duality between non-Hermitian physics and spacetime deformations.

Significance. If the central construction holds, the paper offers a geometric origin for non-Hermitian phenomena, unifying gain/loss and skin effects under metric curvature without ad hoc terms. It provides a concrete lattice realization and stringent conditions for real spectra in 1D NH models, potentially linking NH phases of matter to spacetime geometry. The renormalization-plus-lattice approach is a strength if the pseudo-Hermiticity is shown to survive discretization exactly.

major comments (2)
  1. [Lattice regularization and pseudo-Hermiticity derivation] The central claim that the lattice-regularized Hamiltonian satisfies ηHη^{-1}=H† with unbroken PT symmetry for static diagonal metrics depends on the discretization preserving the continuum pseudo-Hermiticity. The manuscript must explicitly define the discrete inner product (or discrete η) and demonstrate that the chosen finite-difference scheme for the curved-space Dirac operator introduces no O(a) or O(a²) violations of the relation; otherwise the unbroken-PT and real-spectrum assertions are not secured (see the lattice regularization procedure and the derivation of the renormalized Hamiltonian).
  2. [PT-symmetry and spectrum analysis] The assertion that PT symmetry remains unbroken (ensuring real energies) requires explicit verification, such as a spectral calculation or proof for at least one representative static diagonal metric after renormalization and discretization. The continuum argument alone does not guarantee the lattice result.
minor comments (1)
  1. Clarify the precise form of the scaling function Ω(x) in terms of |g| and confirm it is applied uniformly before discretization.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript. The comments highlight important points on the lattice regularization that we will address explicitly in the revision. Below we respond point by point.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Lattice regularization and pseudo-Hermiticity derivation] The central claim that the lattice-regularized Hamiltonian satisfies ηHη^{-1}=H† with unbroken PT symmetry for static diagonal metrics depends on the discretization preserving the continuum pseudo-Hermiticity. The manuscript must explicitly define the discrete inner product (or discrete η) and demonstrate that the chosen finite-difference scheme for the curved-space Dirac operator introduces no O(a) or O(a²) violations of the relation; otherwise the unbroken-PT and real-spectrum assertions are not secured (see the lattice regularization procedure and the derivation of the renormalized Hamiltonian).

    Authors: We agree that the discrete inner product must be defined explicitly to confirm exact preservation of pseudo-Hermiticity. In the revised manuscript we will add a new subsection that (i) defines the discrete η as the diagonal operator with entries given by the lattice-sampled renormalization factor √|g|, (ii) computes the adjoint of the finite-difference Dirac operator with respect to the corresponding discrete inner product, and (iii) verifies by direct algebra that ηHη^{-1}=H† holds exactly for the central-difference stencil on static diagonal metrics, with no O(a) or O(a²) violations introduced by the discretization. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [PT-symmetry and spectrum analysis] The assertion that PT symmetry remains unbroken (ensuring real energies) requires explicit verification, such as a spectral calculation or proof for at least one representative static diagonal metric after renormalization and discretization. The continuum argument alone does not guarantee the lattice result.

    Authors: We accept that a continuum argument is insufficient for the lattice claim. The revised manuscript will include an explicit numerical diagonalization for at least one representative static diagonal metric (a 1D warped geometry with constant curvature gradient). The spectrum of the resulting lattice Hamiltonian will be shown to be entirely real, thereby confirming unbroken PT symmetry on the lattice and securing the real-energy assertion. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained from curved-space Dirac equation plus explicit renormalization.

full rationale

The paper begins from the standard curved-spacetime Dirac equation, introduces an explicit field rescaling tied to √|g|, and applies lattice regularization. The pseudo-Hermiticity for time-independent diagonal metrics is presented as a derived outcome of that procedure rather than a redefinition or fit. No load-bearing self-citations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or ansatzes smuggled via prior work appear in the provided text. The result is not equivalent to its inputs by construction; the renormalization step is an independent modeling choice whose consequences (PT symmetry, NHSE for space-dependent cases) are then explored. This is the normal non-circular case.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of metric-determinant field renormalization and the assumption that lattice regularization preserves the stated symmetries for the coordinate classes considered.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Renormalization of the Dirac field by a scaling function related to the determinant of the metric addresses hermiticity without ad hoc additions.
    Explicitly chosen method stated in the abstract.
  • domain assumption Lattice regularization of the renormalized field yields pseudo-Hermiticity for time-independent diagonal metrics.
    The reported finding depends on this discretization step.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5865 in / 1232 out tokens · 38707 ms · 2026-05-23T06:29:40.824447+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    G. C. McVittie, Dirac’s equation in general relativity, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 92, 868 (1932)

    work page 1932

  2. [2]

    Hollands and R

    S. Hollands and R. M. Wald, Quantum fields in curved spacetime, Phys. Rep. 574, 1 (2015)

    work page 2015

  3. [3]

    Parker, One-electron atom as a probe of spacetime curvature, Phys

    L. Parker, One-electron atom as a probe of spacetime curvature, Phys. Rev. D 22, 1922 (1980)

    work page 1922

  4. [4]

    Huang and L

    X. Huang and L. Parker, Hermiticity of the Dirac Hamiltonian in curved spacetime, Phys. Rev. D 79, 024020 (2009)

    work page 2009

  5. [5]

    Nakahara, Geometry, Topology and Physics (CRC Press, 2018)

    M. Nakahara, Geometry, Topology and Physics (CRC Press, 2018)

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Z. G. Yuto Ashida and M. Ueda, Non-hermitian physics, Adv. Phys. 69, 249 (2020)

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    Okuma and M

    N. Okuma and M. Sato, Non-hermitian topological phenomena: A review, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 14, 83 (2023)

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Kawabata, K

    K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, and S. Ryu, Topological Field Theory of Non-Hermitian Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 216405 (2021)

    work page 2021

  9. [9]

    L. J. Garay, J. R. Anglin, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Sonic analog of gravitational black holes in Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4643 (2000)

    work page 2000

  10. [10]

    Lahav, A

    O. Lahav, A. Itah, A. Blumkin, C. Gordon, S. Rinott, A. Zayats, and J. Steinhauer, Realization of a sonic black hole analog in a Bose-Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 240401 (2010)

    work page 2010

  11. [11]

    Steinhauer, Observation of quantum Hawking radiation and its entanglement in an analogue black hole, Nat

    J. Steinhauer, Observation of quantum Hawking radiation and its entanglement in an analogue black hole, Nat. Phys. 12, 959 (2016)

    work page 2016

  12. [12]

    J. R. Muñoz de Nova, K. Golubkov, V . I. Kolobov, and J. Steinhauer, Observation of thermal Hawking radiation and its temperature in an analogue black hole, Nature 569, 688 (2019)

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    Sheng, H

    C. Sheng, H. Liu, Y . Wang, S. N. Zhu, and D. A. Genov, Trapping light by mimicking gravitational lensing, Nat. Photonics7, 902 (2013)

    work page 2013

  14. [14]

    Bekenstein, Y

    R. Bekenstein, Y . Kabessa, Y . Sharabi, O. Tal, N. Engheta, G. Eisenstein, A. J. Agranat, and M. Segev, Control of light by curved space in nanophotonic structures, Nat. Photonics 11, 664 (2017)

    work page 2017

  15. [15]

    Zhong, J

    F. Zhong, J. Li, H. Liu, and S. Zhu, Controlling surface plasmons through covariant transformation of the spin-dependent geometric phase between curved metamaterials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 243901 (2018)

    work page 2018

  16. [16]

    Sheng, H

    C. Sheng, H. Liu, H. Chen, and S. Zhu, Definite photon deflections of topological defects in metasurfaces and symmetry-breaking phase transitions with material loss, Nat. Commun. 9, 4271 (2018)

    work page 2018

  17. [17]

    Drori, Y

    J. Drori, Y . Rosenberg, D. Bermudez, Y . Silberberg, and U. Leonhardt, Observation of stimulated Hawking radiation in an optical analogue, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 010404 (2019). 9

    work page 2019

  18. [18]

    Boada, A

    O. Boada, A. Celi, J. I. Latorre, and M. Lewenstein, Dirac equation for cold atoms in artificial curved spacetimes, New J. Phys. 13, 035002 (2011)

    work page 2011

  19. [19]

    Cortijo and M

    A. Cortijo and M. A. H. V ozmediano, A cosmological model for corrugated graphene sheets, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top.148, 83 (2007)

    work page 2007

  20. [20]

    de Juan, A

    F. de Juan, A. Cortijo, and M. A. H. V ozmediano, Charge inhomogeneities due to smooth ripples in graphene sheets, Phys. Rev. B76, 165409 (2007)

    work page 2007

  21. [21]

    M. A. H. V ozmediano, F. de Juan, and A. Cortijo, Gauge fields and curvature in graphene, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.129, 012001 (2008)

    work page 2008

  22. [22]

    de Juan, A

    F. de Juan, A. Cortijo, and M. A. V ozmediano, Dislocations and torsion in graphene and related systems, Nucl. Phys. B.828, 625 (2010)

    work page 2010

  23. [23]

    Cortijo, F

    A. Cortijo, F. Guinea, and M. A. H. V ozmediano, Geometrical and topological aspects of graphene and related materials, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 45, 383001 (2012)

    work page 2012

  24. [24]

    Iorio and G

    A. Iorio and G. Lambiase, Quantum field theory in curved graphene spacetimes, Lobachevsky geometry, Weyl symmetry, Hawking effect, and all that, Phys. Rev. D 90, 025006 (2014)

    work page 2014

  25. [25]

    E. V . Castro, A. Flachi, P. Ribeiro, and V . Vitagliano, Symmetry breaking and lattice kirigami, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 221601 (2018)

    work page 2018

  26. [26]

    Morice, A

    C. Morice, A. G. Moghaddam, D. Chernyavsky, J. van Wezel, and J. van den Brink, Synthetic gravitational horizons in low-dimensional quantum matter, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, L022022 (2021)

    work page 2021

  27. [27]

    Könye, C

    V . Könye, C. Morice, D. Chernyavsky, A. G. Moghaddam, J. van den Brink, and J. van Wezel, Horizon physics of quasi-one-dimensional tilted Weyl cones on a lattice, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 033237 (2022)

    work page 2022

  28. [28]

    Mertens, A

    L. Mertens, A. G. Moghaddam, D. Chernyavsky, C. Morice, J. van den Brink, and J. van Wezel, Thermalization by a synthetic horizon, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 043084 (2022)

    work page 2022

  29. [29]

    Könye, L

    V . Könye, L. Mertens, C. Morice, D. Chernyavsky, A. G. Moghaddam, J. van Wezel, and J. van den Brink, Anisotropic optics and gravitational lensing of tilted Weyl fermions, Phys. Rev. B107, L201406 (2023)

    work page 2023

  30. [30]

    Rindler, Kruskal space and the uniformly accelerated frame, Am

    W. Rindler, Kruskal space and the uniformly accelerated frame, Am. J. Phys. 34, 1174 (1966)

    work page 1966

  31. [31]

    de Sitter, On the curvature of space, Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen Proceedings Series B Physical Sciences 20, 229 (1918)

    W. de Sitter, On the curvature of space, Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen Proceedings Series B Physical Sciences 20, 229 (1918)

    work page 1918

  32. [32]

    de Sitter, On the relativity of inertia

    W. de Sitter, On the relativity of inertia. Remarks concerning Einstein’s latest hypothesis, Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen Proceedings Series B Physical Sciences 19, 1217 (1917)

    work page 1917

  33. [33]

    Weyl, Zur Gravitationstheorie, Ann

    H. Weyl, Zur Gravitationstheorie, Ann. Phys. 359, 117 (1917)

    work page 1917

  34. [34]

    R. B. Mann, S. M. Morsink, A. E. Sikkema, and T. G. Steele, Semiclassical gravity in 1+1 dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 43, 3948 (1991)

    work page 1991

  35. [35]

    S. M. Morsink and R. B. Mann, Black hole radiation of Dirac particles in 1+1 dimensions, Classical and Quantum Gravity 8, 2257 (1991)

    work page 1991

  36. [36]

    Sinha and R

    A. Sinha and R. Roychoudhury, Dirac equation in (1+1)-dimensional curved space-time, International Journal of Theoretical Physics 33, 1511 (1994)

    work page 1994

  37. [37]

    Susskind, Lattice fermions, Phys

    L. Susskind, Lattice fermions, Phys. Rev. D 16, 3031 (1977)

    work page 1977

  38. [38]

    C. M. Bender, S. Boettcher, and P. N. Meisinger, PT-symmetric quantum mechanics, Journal of Mathematical Physics 40, 2201 (1999)

    work page 1999

  39. [39]

    A. Mostafazadeh, Pseudo-Hermiticity versus PT symmetry: The necessary condition for the reality of the spectrum of a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian, Journal of Mathematical Physics 43, 205 (2002)

    work page 2002

  40. [40]

    C. M. Bender, PT-symmetric quantum theory, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 631, 012002 (2015)

    work page 2015

  41. [41]

    Hatano and D

    N. Hatano and D. R. Nelson, Localization Transitions in Non-Hermitian Quantum Mechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 570 (1996)

    work page 1996

  42. [42]

    Hatano and D

    N. Hatano and D. R. Nelson, V ortex pinning and non-Hermitian quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. B56, 8651 (1997)

    work page 1997

  43. [43]

    Hatano, Localization in non-Hermitian quantum mechanics and flux-line pinning in superconductors, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 254, 317 (1998)

    N. Hatano, Localization in non-Hermitian quantum mechanics and flux-line pinning in superconductors, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 254, 317 (1998)

    work page 1998

  44. [44]

    Spradlin, A

    M. Spradlin, A. Strominger, and A. V olovich, Les Houches Lectures on De Sitter Space, 2001

    work page 2001

  45. [45]

    Drost, T

    R. Drost, T. Ojanen, A. Harju, and P. Liljeroth, Topological states in engineered atomic lattices, Nat. Phys. 13, 668 (2017)

    work page 2017

  46. [46]

    Palacio-Morales, E

    A. Palacio-Morales, E. Mascot, S. Cocklin, H. Kim, S. Rachel, D. K. Morr, and R. Wiesendanger, Atomic-scale interface engineering of Majorana edge modes in a 2D magnet-superconductor hybrid system, Science Advances 5, eaav6600 (2019)

    work page 2019

  47. [47]

    J. Zhao, L. Chen, D. Li, Z. Shi, P. Liu, Z. Yao, H. Yang, T. Zou, B. Zhao, X. Zhang, H. Zhou, Y . Yang, W. Cao, X. Yan, S. Zhang, and X. W. Sun, Large-area patterning of full-color quantum dot arrays beyond 1000 pixels per inch by selective electrophoretic deposition, Nat. Commun. 12, 4603 (2021)

    work page 2021

  48. [48]

    Bloch, J

    I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and W. Zwerger, Many-body physics with ultracold gases, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 885 (2008)

    work page 2008

  49. [49]

    Mináˇr and B

    J. Mináˇr and B. Grémaud, Mimicking Dirac fields in curved spacetime with fermions in lattices with non-unitary tunneling amplitudes, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 48, 165001 (2015)

    work page 2015

  50. [50]

    B. n. Mula, S. N. Santalla, and J. Rodríguez-Laguna, Casimir forces on deformed fermionic chains, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 013062 (2021)

    work page 2021

  51. [51]

    Ozawa, H

    T. Ozawa, H. M. Price, A. Amo, N. Goldman, M. Hafezi, L. Lu, M. C. Rechtsman, D. Schuster, J. Simon, O. Zilberberg, and I. Carusotto, Topological photonics, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 015006 (2019)

    work page 2019

  52. [52]

    A. A. Houck, H. E. Türeci, and J. Koch, On-chip quantum simulation with superconducting circuits, Nat. Phys. 8, 292 (2012)

    work page 2012

  53. [53]

    B. M. Anderson, R. Ma, C. Owens, D. I. Schuster, and J. Simon, Engineering topological many-body materials in microwave cavity arrays, Phys. Rev. X 6, 041043 (2016)

    work page 2016

  54. [54]

    X. Gu, A. F. Kockum, A. Miranowicz, Y . xi Liu, and F. Nori, Microwave photonics with superconducting quantum circuits, Phys. Rep. 718-719, 1 (2017), microwave photonics with superconducting quantum circuits

    work page 2017

  55. [55]

    Marra, D

    P. Marra, D. Inotani, T. Mizushima, and M. Nitta, Majorana modes in striped two-dimensional inhomogeneous topological superconductors, npj Quantum Materials 9, 59 (2024)

    work page 2024

  56. [56]

    del Valle Inclan Redondo, X

    Y . del Valle Inclan Redondo, X. Xu, T. C. H. Liew, E. A. Ostrovskaya, A. Stegmaier, R. Thomale, C. Schneider, S. Dam, S. Klembt, S. Höfling, S. Tarucha, and M. D. Fraser, Non-reciprocal band structures in an exciton–polariton Floquet optical lattice, Nat. Photonics18, 548 (2024)

    work page 2024

  57. [57]

    Feinberg and A

    J. Feinberg and A. Zee, Spectral curves of non-hermitian hamiltonians, Nucl. Phys. B 552, 599 (1999)

    work page 1999

  58. [58]

    D. A. Green, A colour scheme for the display of astronomical intensity images, Bull. Astron. Soc. India 39, 289 (2011)

    work page 2011