Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 75 references

Network-forming phase separation of oppositely charged polyelectrolytes forming coacervates in a solvent

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Oppositely charged polyelectrolytes coacervate into a percolating network, not droplets, when phase separation starts from a homogeneous solution.

desk verdict A solid simulation study with a genuinely new initial-condition story, but the headline t^{1/2} coarsening law is not as firmly established as the abstract implies. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.15753 v1 pith:OEXHHOWZ submitted 2024-12-20 cond-mat.soft physics.bio-phphysics.chem-ph

Jiaxing Yuan , Hajime Tanaka This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.softphysics.bio-phphysics.chem-ph PACS 64.75.Gh82.35.Rs
keywords coacervationpolyelectrolytecomplexviscoelasticphaseseparationnetworkformationdomaincoarseninghydrodynamicinteractionschargeasymmetryinterfacialtension
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the standard picture of coacervates as spherical droplets obeying classical liquid–liquid phase separation is incomplete. Starting from a thoroughly mixed semi-dilute solution of symmetric oppositely charged polyelectrolytes, the simulations show spontaneous formation of a space-spanning network whose characteristic length grows as $t^{1/2}$, an exponent distinct from the $t^{1/3}$ droplet law. The mechanism is viscoelastic phase separation: the polymer-rich phase relaxes more slowly than the domain deforms, and coarsening is limited by solvent permeation through the dense network. The paper also shows that charge asymmetry slows coarsening through electrostatic repulsion at the network surface, and that droplets formed at low concentration are irregularly shaped because interfacial tension is weak in good solvents. The result matters because it suggests observed droplet morphologies may often be artifacts of imperfect initial mixing, and because it connects coacervate formation to the physics of gels and porous materials.

What carries the argument

The central object is viscoelastic phase separation (VPS), the dynamically asymmetric regime in which the dense phase's structural relaxation time $\tau_\alpha$ is much longer than the domain deformation time $\tau_d$, so the slow phase cannot follow the fast deformation and a transient network forms instead of droplets. The rate-controlling step is solvent permeation through the dense network, captured by the poroelastic equation $\partial \varepsilon/\partial t = D_P \nabla^2 \varepsilon$, whose scaling analysis yields the characteristic length $\ell \sim t^{1/2}$ provided the poroelastic diffusivity $D_P$ can be treated as constant because the dense-phase volume fraction $\phi_d$ barely changes during coarsening. The simulations compare models with hydrodynamic interactions (fluid particle dynamics) and free-draining Brownian dynamics, and the presence of the $t^{1/2}$ versus $t^{1/3}$ difference is used to show that hydrodynamic interactions are essential to this mechanism.

What would settle it

Measure the dense-phase volume fraction and the first moment $\langle q \rangle$ of the structure factor during salt-jump coarsening of a charge-symmetric polyelectrolyte solution: if $\langle q \rangle$ decays as $t^{-1/3}$ rather than $t^{-1/2}$, or if $\phi_d$ changes by more than a few percent over the coarsening window, the poroelastic time-independent-$D_P$ derivation fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the central discovery is that oppositely charged polyelectrolytes, when mixed from a homogeneous semi-dilute solution and allowed to phase separate, first form a transient percolated network that coarsens self-similarly with growth exponent $\nu = 1/2$ in the presence of hydrodynamic interactions, rather than the classical $\nu = 1/3$ of droplet coarsening. The exponent is the same as the mechanical-relaxation-limited coarsening seen in viscoelastic phase separation of neutral polymer solutions and colloidal suspensions, and it is traced to a poroelastic diffusion equation with a time-independent diffusivity because the dense-phase volume fraction stays nearly constant. A distinctive electrostatic ingredient is that the attractions between polycations and polyanions in good solvents are weak and long-ranged, arising from spatial charge inhomogeneity under global charge neutrality, which keeps the dense phase loosely packed and interfacial tension very low. Under charge asymmetry, net surface charge accumulates and decelerates coarsening, eventually causing dynamic slowing down of electrostatic origin.

Load-bearing premise

The scaling derivation treats the poroelastic diffusivity of the dense phase as time-independent, which requires the dense-phase volume fraction to remain nearly constant while the network coarsens; if that density drifts, the $t^{1/2}$ law and the mechanical-relaxation mechanism do not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Spherical coacervate droplets seen in many experiments may partly result from imperfect initial mixing; initiation from a homogeneous state produces transient networks instead.
  • The coarsening exponent for network-forming coacervates should be $t^{1/2}$ with hydrodynamic interactions and $t^{1/3}$ without them, a testable signature.
  • Charge asymmetry provides a control knob: a small excess of one chain length slows coarsening and can stabilize the network against breakup, relevant for porous hydrogels and mesh-like biological condensates.
  • Because the dense phase is loose and interfacial tension is low, droplets are irregular and only slowly round; in good solvents they may remain nonspherical for very long times.
  • Longer polyelectrolyte chains lower the volume fraction needed for network formation, so percolated coacervates should be common at low concentration for long polymers.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • By the paper's logic, bidisperse or partially charged polyelectrolyte mixtures in cells should be expected to form transient networks whenever chain dynamics is slow relative to local deformation; this could explain mesh-like condensates observed in vivo without invoking specific cross-linkers.
  • A direct test of the $1/2$ law would be a stopped-flow salt-jump experiment on a charge-matched polyelectrolyte pair, tracking $\langle q \rangle$ from small-angle scattering: observing $t^{-1/2}$ over two or more decades would confirm the poroelastic mechanism, while $t^{-1/3}$ would indicate classical droplet coarsening.
  • If hydrodynamic interactions are indeed required for the $t^{1/2}$ law, then experiments in highly viscous or confined environments (where hydrodynamic coupling is screened) should show a crossover back toward the $t^{-1/3}$ exponent, a prediction not stated in the paper.
  • The claim that droplets are kinetically trapped in irregular shapes suggests that coacervate 'roundness' could be used as a proxy for interfacial tension, and that measured interfacial tensions from droplet shape relaxation may systematically overestimate equilibration.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper uses fluid particle dynamics (FPD) simulations with explicit electrostatics and hydrodynamic interactions, plus free-draining Brownian dynamics (BD) controls, to study phase separation of oppositely charged polyelectrolytes starting from a homogeneous mixed state. The central observation is that charge-symmetric semi-dilute solutions form a space-spanning network that coarsens as ⟨q⟩ ∼ t^{-1/2} in the presence of hydrodynamic interactions, whereas the same model in BD gives ⟨q⟩ ∼ t^{-1/3}. The authors interpret the t^{-1/2} law as viscoelastic phase separation controlled by poroelastic solvent permeation, with τα ≫ τd. They also report that charge asymmetry decelerates coarsening, that network formation requires a volume fraction above roughly 1% (lower for longer chains), and that droplet-like coacervates formed at lower volume fraction are initially irregular and only slowly become spherical. The paper explicitly acknowledges that the network is transient and that its long-time fate is unresolved.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, the paper significantly expands the standard droplet picture of polyelectrolyte coacervation: it identifies a protocol-dependent network morphology, a distinct growth exponent ν=1/2, and a crucial role for hydrodynamic interactions. The strength of the work lies in the simulation design: FPD with Ewald electrostatics, internal BD comparison, multiple Bjerrum lengths, error bars from four independent runs, and a structure-factor collapse supporting dynamic self-similarity. The paper also states its own limitations clearly, including the transient nature of the network and the coarse-grained treatment of water. However, the asymptotic status of the exponent and the quantitative support for the poroelastic mechanism are not yet fully established, which is why the manuscript needs revision before the claims can be accepted at face value.

major comments (3)
  1. The claimed asymptotic exponent ν=1/2 is not established beyond the finite-size regime. With the box size L=69.2σ given in Methods, the smallest nonzero wavevector is q_minσ/2π = 1/69.2 ≈ 0.0145. In Fig. 2a, 2c, and 2e, ⟨q⟩σ/2π reaches values of order 0.01–0.02 near t ≈ 10^4–10^5 τBD, so the last decade of the drawn −1/2 slope sits close to the fundamental lattice mode, where periodic wraparound of a single spanning network can pin the first moment. The FPD/BD exponent difference is visible at intermediate times, but the asymptotic t^{1/2} law is a finite-window observation; the manuscript itself states that the network is transient and its long-time fate is unresolved. Please provide larger-box simulations or restrict the exponent claim to a window clearly above the box-size floor, and report uncertainties on the fitted exponents rather than only error bars on ⟨q⟩.
  2. The derivation of ℓ ∼ t^{1/2} from Eq. (1) rests on the assumption that D_P is time-independent because the dense-phase volume fraction ϕd remains nearly constant during coarsening. No time-resolved ϕd(t) during network coarsening is shown; the values ϕ ≈ 0.38 and 0.42 quoted in Methods come from separate bulk equilibrium simulations, not from the coarsening network. The structural self-similarity evidence in Fig. 3b covers only t = 4000–12000 τBD, a factor of 3, whereas the exponent is claimed over a much longer interval. The poroelastic mechanism is therefore plausible but not demonstrated: if ϕd drifts, or if the dense phase cannot be described by a single poroelastic diffusivity, the t^{1/2} scaling from Eq. (1) does not follow. I would like to see ϕd(t) during coarsening and, if possible, a direct test of the diffusive relaxation implied by Eq. (1), or a clearly softened claim that the mechanism is inferred by analogy with previous work.
  3. The central morphological claim that the system forms a percolated, space-spanning network, and the reported morphology transition at ϕ* between 0.6% and 1.2%, are based on representative snapshots and visual inspection. No percolation probability, largest-cluster size, or connectivity order parameter is reported, despite the availability of four independent runs. Because the abstract and conclusion emphasize network formation and the crossover volume fraction, a quantitative percolation analysis is needed to support the 'space-spanning network' assertion and the claimed dependence of ϕ* on chain length.
minor comments (4)
  1. The abstract calls the growth law 'unique', but the same ν=1/2 exponent was previously reported for viscoelastic phase separation of neutral low-molecular-weight polymer solutions and colloidal suspensions (Refs. [52,55]); the novelty is the polyelectrolyte system and the persistence of self-similarity, so the wording should be adjusted to avoid overstatement.
  2. The panel labels inside Fig. 2 are difficult to parse in the present version (for example the text fragments near panels a and c); please redraw the figure with clear panel labels and consistent axis annotations.
  3. The Methods section states that the strain rate is obtained from the linear increase of |ε_bulk| and |ε_shear| with δt, but it does not specify the range of δt used for the linear fit; please give this range explicitly, since the extracted τd depends on it.
  4. The caption for panels g–i mentions data at lB=2σ and lB=3σ, but panel g is not annotated to show which curve corresponds to which Bjerrum length; please label the curves directly in the figure.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the t^{1/2} exponent is measured in new simulations, and self-citations are contextual rather than load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central quantitative claim (ell ~ t^{1/2}, i.e., <q> ~ t^{-1/2} under charge symmetry with hydrodynamic interactions) is read directly from the first moment of the simulated structure factor (Fig. 2), with four independent runs and a BD (no-HI) comparison giving t^{-1/3}; it is not obtained by fitting a parameter and then relabelling it as a prediction. The scaling derivation in the 'Scaling derivation' section starts from the poroelastic diffusion equation d(epsilon)/dt = D_P grad^2 epsilon (Eq. 1) and obtains ell ~ t^{1/2} by dimensional analysis; D_P is not calibrated to the measured <q>, so the derivation is not equivalent to its data input. The VPS interpretation is supported by new, independent checks in this paper: measured tau_alpha ~ 70-100 tau_BD versus tau_d ~ 5-10 tau_BD and a scaled-structure-factor collapse (Fig. 3b), rather than by mere citation. Self-citations to Refs. [27,52,55] supply the interpretive framework and comparison values (e.g., phi_d ~ 50% for neutral polymer networks), but the present phi_d ~ 40% is measured here and the central observation does not reduce to those prior results. The finite-size/asymptotic concern (<q> approaching the box fundamental mode near t ~ 10^4-10^5 tau_BD) and the unresolved long-time fate of the network are acknowledged limitations and represent correctness risks, not circularity. Overall, no step in the derivation chain is equivalent by construction to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard coarse-grained simulation practice plus domain-specific assumptions about the experimental protocol and the poroelastic relaxation mechanism. No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • Density threshold ρth for network surface = 0.5 (robustness checked with 0.4)
    Chosen by hand to define the dense phase in the distance-to-surface analysis; the authors show qualitative results are unchanged for ρth=0.4.
  • Droplet cluster distance cutoff = 1.5σ
    Geometric criterion to define droplets for asphericity measurements; affects A values but not the growth exponents.
  • Poor-solvent LJ attraction strength ε = 0.5, 1.3, 2 kBT
    Chosen to model hydrophobic attractions; control parameter, not fitted to reproduce the claimed exponents.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Explicit water is not simulated; the solvent is a continuous dielectric medium described by FPD.
    Methods, FPD; the authors argue in the limitations section that explicit water would not alter conclusions at the studied length scales.
  • domain assumption The poroelastic diffusion equation ∂ε/∂t = D_P ∇²ε with time-independent D_P governs network coarsening.
    Eq. (1); D_P is assumed constant because the dense-phase volume fraction ϕd is claimed to stay nearly constant.
  • domain assumption The homogeneous mixed initial state (WCA equilibration, then electrostatics switched on) mimics the experimental desalting or ion-retraction protocol.
    Methods, Polyelectrolyte modelling; the paper connects this to experiments such as Murakawa et al. [37].
  • domain assumption Phase separation in this study is spinodal decomposition rather than nucleation-growth, based on rapid exponential growth of I(t).
    Results, droplet section; no quantitative exponential fit is shown.
  • domain assumption Structural relaxation time τα measured in a bulk dense phase at ϕ≈0.38-0.42 represents the relaxation of the network phase in the phase-separating system.
    Methods, Structure relaxation time τα; the network phase may relax differently due to connectivity and surface effects.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Network-forming phase separation of oppositely charged polyelectrolytes forming coacervates in a solvent." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OEXHHOWZ

@misc{pith2026241215753,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Network-forming phase separation of oppositely charged polyelectrolytes forming coacervates in a solvent},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OEXHHOWZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.15753}
}
abstract

The formation of coacervates through phase separation of oppositely charged polyelectrolytes (PEs) is critical for understanding biological condensates and developing responsive materials. Traditionally, coacervates are viewed as spherical droplets with growth dynamics resembling liquid-liquid phase separation. However, our fluid particle dynamics simulations incorporating hydrodynamic and electrostatic interactions challenge this perspective. Here, we find that oppositely charged PEs form a percolated network even in semi-dilute solutions, coarsening with a unique growth law, $\ell \propto t^{1/2}$. This self-similarity, absent for neutral polymers in poor solvents, arises because PEs in good solvents exhibit weaker, longer-range attractions due to spatial charge inhomogeneity under global charge neutrality. This results in a lower density of the PEs-rich phase and reduced interfacial tension. Increased charge asymmetry further slows network coarsening. Additionally, coacervate droplets initially display irregular shapes due to weak interfacial tension, transitioning slowly to spherical forms. Our research provides new insights into coacervate morphology and coarsening dynamics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.15753 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Structural evolution during network-forming phase [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. , the coarsening dynamics of domains slow down in the presence of charge asymmetry, leading to a tendency of dynamic slowing down in the later stages. This de￾celeration in coarsening holds even when there is only a slight asymmetry in PE charges (e.g., Nc = 45, Na = 35). These observations are consistent with prior research [17], which demonstrates that charge asymmetry significantly impedes the coarsening of indiv… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. FIG. 5. The phase separation morphology of polycations and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Distribution of polycations and polyanions during [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Droplet-forming phase separation in oppositely [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Network-forming and droplet-forming phase sepa [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Murugappan Muthukumar, Physics of Charged Macro- molecules (Cambridge University Press, 2023)

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    Polyelectrolyte complexes: Bulk phases and colloidal systems,

    Jasper Van der Gucht, Evan Spruijt, Marc Lemmers, and Martien A Cohen Stuart, “Polyelectrolyte complexes: Bulk phases and colloidal systems,” J. Colloid Interface Sci. 361, 407–422 (2011). 14

    work page 2011

  3. [3]

    Polyelectrolyte com- plexes of natural polymers and their biomedical applica- tions,

    Masayuki Ishihara, Satoko Kishimoto, Shingo Nakamura, Yoko Sato, and Hidemi Hattori, “Polyelectrolyte com- plexes of natural polymers and their biomedical applica- tions,” Polymers 11, 672 (2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    Coacervation in polyzwitterion-polyelectrolyte systems and their poten- tial applications for gastrointestinal drug delivery plat- forms,

    Khatcher O Margossian, Marcel U Brown, Todd Em- rick, and Murugappan Muthukumar, “Coacervation in polyzwitterion-polyelectrolyte systems and their poten- tial applications for gastrointestinal drug delivery plat- forms,” Nat. Commun. 13, 2250 (2022)

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    Challenges in developing of chitosan–based poly- electrolyte complexes as a platform for mucosal and skin drug delivery,

    Joanna Pota´ s, Emilia Szyma´ nska, and Katarzyna Win- nicka, “Challenges in developing of chitosan–based poly- electrolyte complexes as a platform for mucosal and skin drug delivery,” Eur. Polym. J. 140, 110020 (2020)

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Physical principles of intracellular organization via ac- tive and passive phase transitions,

    Joel Berry, Clifford P Brangwynne, and Mikko Haataja, “Physical principles of intracellular organization via ac- tive and passive phase transitions,” Rep. Prog. Phys. 81, 046601 (2018)

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    Viscoelastic phase separation in biolog- ical cells,

    Hajime Tanaka, “Viscoelastic phase separation in biolog- ical cells,” Commun. Phys. 5, 167 (2022)

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    Characterization of RNA content in individual phase- separated coacervate microdroplets,

    Damian Wollny, Benjamin Vernot, Jie Wang, Maria Hon- dele, Aram Safrastyan, Franziska Aron, Julia Micheel, Zhisong He, Anthony Hyman, Karsten Weis, et al., “Characterization of RNA content in individual phase- separated coacervate microdroplets,” Nat. Commun. 13, 2626 (2022)

    work page 2022

Show all 75 references
  1. [9]

    Development of the modern theory of polymeric complex coacervation,

    Charles E Sing, “Development of the modern theory of polymeric complex coacervation,” Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 239, 2–16 (2017)

    2017

  2. [10]

    Recent progress in the science of complex coacervation,

    Charles E Sing and Sarah L Perry, “Recent progress in the science of complex coacervation,” Soft Matter 16, 2885–2914 (2020)

    2020

  3. [11]

    Polyelectrolyte complex coacervates: Recent developments and new frontiers,

    Artem M Rumyantsev, Nicholas E Jackson, and Juan J De Pablo, “Polyelectrolyte complex coacervates: Recent developments and new frontiers,” Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 12, 155–176 (2021)

    2021

  4. [12]

    Expanding the structural diversity of poly- electrolyte complexes and polyzwitterions,

    Angelika E Neitzel, Guilhem X De Hoe, and Matthew V Tirrell, “Expanding the structural diversity of poly- electrolyte complexes and polyzwitterions,” Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 25, 100897 (2021)

    2021

  5. [13]

    Molecular connectivity and correlation effects on polymer coacerva- tion,

    Mithun Radhakrishna, Kush Basu, Yalin Liu, Rasmia Shamsi, Sarah L Perry, and Charles E Sing, “Molecular connectivity and correlation effects on polymer coacerva- tion,” Macromolecules 50, 3030–3037 (2017)

    2017

  6. [14]

    Role of chain flexibility in asym- metric polyelectrolyte complexation in salt solutions,

    Anisha Shakya, Martin Girard, John T King, and Mon- ica Olvera de la Cruz, “Role of chain flexibility in asym- metric polyelectrolyte complexation in salt solutions,” Macromolecules 53, 1258–1269 (2020)

    2020

  7. [15]

    Complexation between oppositely charged polyelec- trolytes in dilute solution: Effects of charge asymmetry,

    Shensheng Chen, Pengfei Zhang, and Zhen-Gang Wang, “Complexation between oppositely charged polyelec- trolytes in dilute solution: Effects of charge asymmetry,” Macromolecules 55, 3898–3909 (2022)

    2022

  8. [16]

    Driving force and pathway in polyelectrolyte complex coacervation,

    Shensheng Chen and Zhen-Gang Wang, “Driving force and pathway in polyelectrolyte complex coacervation,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 119, e2209975119 (2022)

    2022

  9. [17]

    Charge asym- metry suppresses coarsening dynamics in polyelectrolyte complex coacervation,

    Shensheng Chen and Zhen-Gang Wang, “Charge asym- metry suppresses coarsening dynamics in polyelectrolyte complex coacervation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 218201 (2023)

    2023

  10. [18]

    6, 1573–1585 (2005)

    H Bohidar, PL Dubin, PR Majhi, C Tribet, and W Jaeger, “Effects of protein-polyelectrolyte affinity and polyelectrolyte molecular weight on dynamic proper- ties of bovine serum albumin-poly (diallyldimethylammo- nium chloride) coacervates,” Biomacromol. 6, 1573–1585 (2005)

    2005

  11. [19]

    Linear viscoelasticity of polyelectrolyte complex coacervates,

    Evan Spruijt, Martien A Cohen Stuart, and Jasper van der Gucht, “Linear viscoelasticity of polyelectrolyte complex coacervates,” Macromolecules 46, 1633–1641 (2013)

    2013

  12. [20]

    Polyelec- trolyte complexation,

    Samanvaya Srivastava and Matthew V Tirrell, “Polyelec- trolyte complexation,” Adv. Chem. Phys. 161, 499–544 (2016)

    2016

  13. [21]

    Effect of solvent quality on the phase behavior of polyelectrolyte complexes,

    Lu Li, Artem M Rumyantsev, Samanvaya Srivastava, Siqi Meng, Juan J De Pablo, and Matthew V Tirrell, “Effect of solvent quality on the phase behavior of polyelectrolyte complexes,” Macromolecules 54, 105–114 (2020)

    2020

  14. [22]

    Liquid crystal coacervates composed of short double-stranded DNA and cationic peptides,

    Tommaso P Fraccia and Tony Z Jia, “Liquid crystal coacervates composed of short double-stranded DNA and cationic peptides,” ACS Nano 14, 15071–15082 (2020)

    2020

  15. [23]

    Sequence and entropy-based control of complex coacervates,

    Li-Wei Chang, Tyler K Lytle, Mithun Radhakrishna, Ja- son J Madinya, Jon V´ elez, Charles E Sing, and Sarah L Perry, “Sequence and entropy-based control of complex coacervates,” Nat. Commun. 8, 1273 (2017)

    2017

  16. [24]

    Molecular design of self-coacervation phenomena in block polyam- pholytes,

    Scott PO Danielsen, James McCarty, Joan-Emma Shea, Kris T Delaney, and Glenn H Fredrickson, “Molecular design of self-coacervation phenomena in block polyam- pholytes,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sci- ences 116, 8224–8232 (2019)

    2019

  17. [25]

    Isotropic-to-nematic transition in salt- free polyelectrolyte coacervates from coarse-grained sim- ulations,

    Boyuan Yu, Heyi Liang, Artem M Rumyantsev, and Juan J de Pablo, “Isotropic-to-nematic transition in salt- free polyelectrolyte coacervates from coarse-grained sim- ulations,” Macromolecules 55, 9627–9639 (2022)

    2022

  18. [26]

    Hydrodynamic ef- fects on the collapse kinetics of flexible polyelectrolytes,

    Jiaxing Yuan and Hajime Tanaka, “Hydrodynamic ef- fects on the collapse kinetics of flexible polyelectrolytes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 038101 (2024)

    2024

  19. [27]

    Viscoelastic phase separation,

    Hajime Tanaka, “Viscoelastic phase separation,” J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 12, R207–R264 (2000)

    2000

  20. [28]

    Phase separation in soft matter: The concept of dynamic asymmetry,

    Hajime Tanaka, “Phase separation in soft matter: The concept of dynamic asymmetry,” Soft Interfaces: Lecture Notes of the Les Houches Summer School 98, 465–526 (2017)

    2017

  21. [29]

    Akira Onuki, Phase Transition Dynamics (Cambridge University Press, 2002)

    2002

  22. [30]

    Late stages of spinodal decomposition in binary mixtures,

    Eric D Siggia, “Late stages of spinodal decomposition in binary mixtures,” Phys. Rev. A 20, 595 (1979)

    1979

  23. [31]

    A novel coarsen- ing mechanism of droplets in immiscible fluid mixtures,

    Ryotaro Shimizu and Hajime Tanaka, “A novel coarsen- ing mechanism of droplets in immiscible fluid mixtures,” Nat. Commun. 6, 7407 (2015)

    2015

  24. [32]

    Chirality-selected phase behaviour in ionic polypeptide complexes,

    Sarah L Perry, Lorraine Leon, Kyle Q Hoffmann, Matthew J Kade, Dimitrios Priftis, Katie A Black, Derek Wong, Ryan A Klein, Charles F Pierce III, Khatcher O Margossian, et al., “Chirality-selected phase behaviour in ionic polypeptide complexes,” Nat. Commun. 6, 6052 (2015)

    2015

  25. [33]

    Spatiotemporal control of coacervate formation within liposomes,

    Siddharth Deshpande, Frank Brandenburg, Anson Lau, Mart GF Last, Willem Kasper Spoelstra, Louis Reese, Sreekar Wunnava, Marileen Dogterom, and Cees Dekker, “Spatiotemporal control of coacervate formation within liposomes,” Nat. Commun. 10, 1800 (2019)

    2019

  26. [34]

    Coacervate complex formation between cationic polyacrylamide and anionic sulfonated kraft lignin,

    Alois Vanerek and T. G. M. Van de Ven, “Coacervate complex formation between cationic polyacrylamide and anionic sulfonated kraft lignin,” Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 273, 55–62 (2006)

    2006

  27. [35]

    Dual network formation in polyelec- trolyte hydrogel via viscoelastic phase separation: Role of ionic strength and polymerization kinetics,

    Zi Liang Wu, Takayuki Kurokawa, Songmiao Liang, and Jian Ping Gong, “Dual network formation in polyelec- trolyte hydrogel via viscoelastic phase separation: Role of ionic strength and polymerization kinetics,” Macro- molecules 43, 8202–8208 (2010). 15

    2010

  28. [36]

    Versa- tile and high-throughput polyelectrolyte complex mem- branes via phase inversion,

    Kazi Sadman, David E Delgado, Yechan Won, Qifeng Wang, Kimberly A Gray, and Kenneth R Shull, “Versa- tile and high-throughput polyelectrolyte complex mem- branes via phase inversion,” ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 16018–16026 (2019)

    2019

  29. [37]

    Poly- electrolyte complexation via viscoelastic phase separa- tion results in tough and self-recovering porous hydro- gels,

    Kohei Murakawa, Daniel R King, Taolin Sun, Honglei Guo, Takayuki Kurokawa, and Jian Ping Gong, “Poly- electrolyte complexation via viscoelastic phase separa- tion results in tough and self-recovering porous hydro- gels,” J. Mater. Chem. B 7, 5296–5305 (2019)

    2019

  30. [38]

    Polyelectrolyte com- plex membranes via salinity change induced aqueous phase separation,

    Elif Nur Durmaz, Muhammad Irshad Baig, Joshua D Willott, and Wiebe M de Vos, “Polyelectrolyte com- plex membranes via salinity change induced aqueous phase separation,” ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2, 2612– 2621 (2020)

    2020

  31. [39]

    Sustainable mem- brane production through polyelectrolyte complexation induced aqueous phase separation,

    Muhammad Irshad Baig, Elif Nur Durmaz, Joshua D Willott, and Wiebe M de Vos, “Sustainable mem- brane production through polyelectrolyte complexation induced aqueous phase separation,” Adv. Funct. Mater. 30, 1907344 (2020)

    2020

  32. [40]

    Tuning the structure and performance of polyelectrolyte complexation based aqueous phase sep- aration membranes,

    Muhammad Irshad Baig, Joshua D. Willott, and Wiebe M. de Vos, “Tuning the structure and performance of polyelectrolyte complexation based aqueous phase sep- aration membranes,” J. Membr. Sci. 615, 118502 (2020)

    2020

  33. [41]

    Design principles for strong and tough hydrogels,

    Xueyu Li and Jian Ping Gong, “Design principles for strong and tough hydrogels,” Nat. Rev. Mater. , 1–19 (2024)

    2024

  34. [42]

    Network-forming phase separation of colloidal suspen- sions,

    Hajime Tanaka, Yuya Nishikawa, and Takehito Koyama, “Network-forming phase separation of colloidal suspen- sions,” J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 17, L143 (2005)

    2005

  35. [43]

    Formation of porous crystals via vis- coelastic phase separation,

    Hideyo Tsurusawa, John Russo, Mathieu Leocmach, and Hajime Tanaka, “Formation of porous crystals via vis- coelastic phase separation,” Nat. Mater. 16, 1022–1028 (2017)

    2017

  36. [44]

    Direct link between mechanical stabil- ity in gels and percolation of isostatic particles,

    Hideyo Tsurusawa, Mathieu Leocmach, John Russo, and Hajime Tanaka, “Direct link between mechanical stabil- ity in gels and percolation of isostatic particles,” Sci. Adv. 5, eaav6090 (2019)

    2019

  37. [46]

    Unusual phase separation in a poly- mer solution caused by asymmetric molecular dynamics,

    Hajime Tanaka, “Unusual phase separation in a poly- mer solution caused by asymmetric molecular dynamics,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 3158–3161 (1993)

    1993

  38. [47]

    Generic kinetic pathway of phase separation of deeply quenched polymer solutions: Transient gelation,

    Takehito Koyama and Hajime Tanaka, “Generic kinetic pathway of phase separation of deeply quenched polymer solutions: Transient gelation,” Europhys. Lett. 80, 68002 (2007)

    2007

  39. [48]

    Spin- odal decomposition in a model colloid-polymer mixture in microgravity,

    A. E. Bailey, W. C. K. Poon, R. J. Christianson, A. B. Schofield, U. Gasser, V. Prasad, S. Manley, P. N. Segre, L. Cipelletti, W. V. Meyer, M. P. Doherty, S. Sankaran, A. L. Jankovsky, W. L. Shiley, J. P. Bowen, J. C. Eggers, C. Kurta, T. Lorik, P. N. Pusey, and D. A. Weitz, “...

    2007

  40. [49]

    Cluster, glass, and gel formation and viscoelastic phase separa- tion in aqueous clay suspensions,

    Andrey Shalkevich, Anna Stradner, Suresh Kumar Bhat, Fran¸ cois Muller, and Peter Schurtenberger, “Cluster, glass, and gel formation and viscoelastic phase separa- tion in aqueous clay suspensions,” Langmuir 23, 3570– 3580 (2007)

    2007

  41. [50]

    Phase separation dynamics of gluten protein mixtures,

    Am´ elie Banc, Justine Pincemaille, Salvatore Costanzo, Edouard Chauveau, Marie-Sousai Appavou, Marie- H´ el` ene Morel, Paul Menut, and Laurence Ramos, “Phase separation dynamics of gluten protein mixtures,” Soft Matter 15, 6160–6170 (2019)

    2019

  42. [51]

    Self- organization in phase separation of a lyotropic liquid crystal into cellular, network and droplet morphologies,

    Yasutaka Iwashita and Hajime Tanaka, “Self- organization in phase separation of a lyotropic liquid crystal into cellular, network and droplet morphologies,” Nat. Mater. 5, 147–152 (2006)

    2006

  43. [52]

    Me- chanical slowing down of network-forming phase separa- tion of polymer solutions,

    Jiaxing Yuan, Michio Tateno, and Hajime Tanaka, “Me- chanical slowing down of network-forming phase separa- tion of polymer solutions,” ACS Nano 17, 18025–18036 (2023)

    2023

  44. [53]

    Early stage kinetics of polyelectrolyte complex coacervation monitored through stopped-flow light scattering,

    Xiaoqing Liu, Marie Haddou, Isabelle Grillo, Zohra Mana, Jean-Paul Chapel, and Christophe Schatz, “Early stage kinetics of polyelectrolyte complex coacervation monitored through stopped-flow light scattering,” Soft Matter 12, 9030–9038 (2016)

    2016

  45. [54]

    Structure, thermodynamic and kinetic signatures of a synthetic polyelectrolyte coacervating system,

    Xiaoqing Liu, Jean-Paul Chapel, and Christophe Schatz, “Structure, thermodynamic and kinetic signatures of a synthetic polyelectrolyte coacervating system,” Adv. Col- loid Interface Sci. 239, 178–186 (2017)

    2017

  46. [55]

    Power-law coars- ening in network-forming phase separation governed by mechanical relaxation,

    Michio Tateno and Hajime Tanaka, “Power-law coars- ening in network-forming phase separation governed by mechanical relaxation,” Nat. Commun. 12, 912 (2021)

    2021

  47. [56]

    Hydrodynamic selection of the kinetic pathway of a polymer coil-globule transition,

    Kumiko Kamata, Takeaki Araki, and Hajime Tanaka, “Hydrodynamic selection of the kinetic pathway of a polymer coil-globule transition,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 108303 (2009)

    2009

  48. [57]

    General theory of three-dimensional consolidation,

    Maurice A Biot, “General theory of three-dimensional consolidation,” J. Appl. Phys. 12, 155–164 (1941)

    1941

  49. [58]

    In- terfacial tension of polyelectrolyte complex coacervate phases,

    Jian Qin, Dimitrios Priftis, Robert Farina, Sarah L Perry, Lorraine Leon, Jonathan Whitmer, Kyle Hoff- mann, Matthew Tirrell, and Juan J De Pablo, “In- terfacial tension of polyelectrolyte complex coacervate phases,” ACS Macro Lett. 3, 565–568 (2014)

    2014

  50. [59]

    Characterization of the ultralow interfacial tension in liquid–liquid phase sep- arated polyelectrolyte complex coacervates by the de- formed drop retraction method,

    Samim Ali and Vivek M Prabhu, “Characterization of the ultralow interfacial tension in liquid–liquid phase sep- arated polyelectrolyte complex coacervates by the de- formed drop retraction method,” mm 52, 7495–7502 (2019)

    2019

  51. [60]

    Interfacial struc- ture and tension of polyelectrolyte complex coacervates,

    Pengfei Zhang and Zhen-Gang Wang, “Interfacial struc- ture and tension of polyelectrolyte complex coacervates,” Macromolecules 54, 10994–11007 (2021)

    2021

  52. [61]

    Water-mediated ion pairing: Occurrence and rele- vance,

    Nico F A Van Der Vegt, Kristoffer Haldrup, Sylvie Roke, Junrong Zheng, Mikael Lund, and Huib J Bakker, “Water-mediated ion pairing: Occurrence and rele- vance,” Chem. Rev. 116, 7626–7641 (2016)

    2016

  53. [62]

    Impact of hydrody- namic interactions on the kinetic pathway of protein fold- ing,

    Jiaxing Yuan and Hajime Tanaka, “Impact of hydrody- namic interactions on the kinetic pathway of protein fold- ing,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 138402 (2024)

    2024

  54. [63]

    Simulation method of colloidal suspensions with hydrodynamic interactions: Fluid particle dynamics,

    Hajime Tanaka and Takeaki Araki, “Simulation method of colloidal suspensions with hydrodynamic interactions: Fluid particle dynamics,” Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 1338–1341 (2000)

    2000

  55. [64]

    Solid–liquid–solution phases in Poly (di- allyldimethylammonium)/Poly (acrylic acid) polyelec- trolyte complexes at varying temperatures,

    Chikaodinaka I. Eneh, Kevin Nixon, Suvesh Manoj Lal- wani, Maria Sammalkorpi, Piotr Batys, and Jodie L. Lutkenhaus, “Solid–liquid–solution phases in Poly (di- allyldimethylammonium)/Poly (acrylic acid) polyelec- trolyte complexes at varying temperatures,” Macro- molecules 57, ...

    2024

  56. [65]

    Universality of viscoelastic phase sepa- ration in dynamically asymmetric fluid mixtures,

    Hajime Tanaka, “Universality of viscoelastic phase sepa- ration in dynamically asymmetric fluid mixtures,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 787 (1996)

    1996

  57. [66]

    Viscoelastic phase separation of protein solutions,

    Hajime Tanaka and Yuya Nishikawa, “Viscoelastic phase separation of protein solutions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 078103 (2005). 16

    2005

  58. [67]

    Multiphase complex coac- ervate droplets,

    Tiemei Lu and Evan Spruijt, “Multiphase complex coac- ervate droplets,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 2905–2914 (2020)

    2020

  59. [68]

    Regulated assembly of a supramolecular centrosome scaffold in vitro,

    Jeffrey B. Woodruff, Oliver Wueseke, Valeria Viscardi, Julia Mahamid, Stacy D. Ochoa, Jakob Bunkenborg, Per O. Widlund, Andrei Pozniakovsky, Esther Zanin, Shirin Bahmanyar, Andrea Zinke, Sun Hae Hong, Marcus Decker, Wolfgang Baumeister, Jens S. Andersen, Karen Oegema, and Anth...

    2015

  60. [69]

    In vivo reconstitution finds multivalent RNA–RNA in- teractions as drivers of mesh-like condensates,

    Weirui Ma, Gang Zheng, Wei Xie, and Christine Mayr, “In vivo reconstitution finds multivalent RNA–RNA in- teractions as drivers of mesh-like condensates,” eLife 10, e64252 (2021)

    2021

  61. [70]

    Connecting the “dots

    Haiyan An, Camille Rabesahala de Meritens, and Tatyana A. Shelkovnikova, “Connecting the “dots”: RNP granule network in health and disease,” Biochim. Bio- phys. Acta - Mol. Cell Res. 1868, 119058 (2021)

    2021

  62. [71]

    Electrostatically driven complex coac- ervation and amyloid aggregation of tau are independent processes with overlapping conditions,

    Yanxian Lin, Yann Fichou, Zhikai Zeng, Nicole Y Hu, and Songi Han, “Electrostatically driven complex coac- ervation and amyloid aggregation of tau are independent processes with overlapping conditions,” ACS Chem. Neu- rosci. 11, 615–627 (2020)

    2020

  63. [72]

    Liquid– liquid phase separation of Tau by self and complex coac- ervation,

    Saeed Najafi, Yanxian Lin, Andrew P Longhini, Xue- mei Zhang, Kris T Delaney, Kenneth S Kosik, Glenn H Fredrickson, Joan-Emma Shea, and Songi Han, “Liquid– liquid phase separation of Tau by self and complex coac- ervation,” Protein Sci. 30, 1393–1407 (2021)

    2021

  64. [73]

    Molecular mechanism for the synchronized electrostatic coacerva- tion and co-aggregation of alpha-synuclein and tau,

    Pablo Gracia, David Polanco, Jorge Taranc´ on-D ´ ıez, Ile- nia Serra, Maruan Bracci, Javier Oroz, Douglas V Lau- rents, In´ es Garc ´ ıa, and Nunilo Cremades, “Molecular mechanism for the synchronized electrostatic coacerva- tion and co-aggregation of alpha-synuclein and tau,...

    2022

  65. [74]

    The nature of flexi- ble linear polyelectrolytes in salt free solution: A molec- ular dynamics study,

    Mark J. Stevens and Kurt Kremer, “The nature of flexi- ble linear polyelectrolytes in salt free solution: A molec- ular dynamics study,” J. Chem. Phys. 103, 1669–1690 (1995)

    1995

  66. [75]

    Im- pact of inverse squeezing flow on the self-assembly of op- positely charged colloidal particles under electric field,

    Jiaxing Yuan, Kyohei Takae, and Hajime Tanaka, “Im- pact of inverse squeezing flow on the self-assembly of op- positely charged colloidal particles under electric field,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 248001 (2022)

    2022

  67. [76]

    Numerical predic- tion of colloidal phase separation by direct computation of Navier–Stokes equation,

    Michio Tateno and Hajime Tanaka, “Numerical predic- tion of colloidal phase separation by direct computation of Navier–Stokes equation,” Npj Comput. Mater. 5, 40 (2019)

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.