Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 84 references

LEARN: A Unified Framework for Multi-Task Domain Adapt Few-Shot Learning

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read LEARN claims to be the first framework unifying domain adaptation and few-shot learning across image classification, object detection, and video classification.

desk verdict A genuinely useful open-source few-shot framework, but the 'domain adaptation across three tasks' headline is only true for image classification — the paper's own tables show OD and VC are SSL pretraining plus fine-tuning. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.16275 v1 pith:K2M77P7Z submitted 2024-12-20 cs.CV cs.AIcs.LG

Bharadwaj Ravichandran , Alexander Lynch , Sarah Brockman , Brandon RichardWebster , Dawei Du , Anthony Hoogs , Christopher Funk This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CVcs.AIcs.LG
keywords few-shotlearningdomainadaptationimageclassificationobjectdetectionvideoself-supervisedactiveincrementaln-shot
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

LEARN is a software framework, not a new learning algorithm. The paper's central claim is that it is the first system to combine domain adaptation and few-shot learning across three vision tasks — image classification, object detection, and video classification — in a single configurable pipeline. The framework lets a user specify source and target datasets, an algorithm per task, and a sequence of incremental n-shot budgets, then runs the whole scaling curve from 1-shot to full-dataset training in one experiment. The broader point is that few-shot and domain-adaptation tools have so far lived in separate, task-specific frameworks; LEARN argues that one modular codebase can serve all of them. The paper supports the claim with benchmarks of eight algorithms on six datasets.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the stage-and-budget workflow: each 'base' or 'adapt' stage names a target dataset, a list of seed budgets (1-shot, 2-shot, and so on), and a cumulative label budget; the framework iterates through active-learning queries and few-shot adaptation sub-stages at every budget level, optionally feeding the trained network and target dataset into the next stage as the new source. Hydra configuration files expose every hyperparameter and allow task- and algorithm-specific overrides, and a whitelist mechanism restricts which source datasets are loaded. This workflow is what turns few-shot domain adaptation from a one-off experiment into an on-the-fly, incremental protocol.

What would settle it

Inspect the experiment configurations and code paths for the object detection (DETReg, CutLER) and video classification (X-Clip, TimeSformer, CoMix) stages: if the source dataset only supplies pretrained weights and never enters a loss that aligns source and target representations during adaptation, and if the video benchmarks contain no source-target pair beyond UCF101 as target, the multi-task domain-adaptation claim is not supported for those two tasks.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The discovery is architectural: a modular pipeline that structures each adaptation stage into four sub-stages — domain and network selection, algorithm selection, active-learning query strategy, and a few-shot domain adaptation step — orchestrated by Hydra configuration files and driven by seed budgets (n labels per class) and cumulative label budgets. The framework claims to be the first unified system to support multi-stage, domain-adapt, incremental n-shot learning across image classification, object detection, and video classification, with optional self-supervised pretraining. It also claims that the same run can extend from a few-shot setting to a conventional many-shot setting without restarting the experiment from scratch.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's claim to unify domain adaptation across three tasks assumes that fine-tuning a self-supervised pretrained object detector or video classifier on target data is itself a domain-adaptation step, even though no explicit source-to-target alignment is shown for those tasks.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single Hydra command can run an entire experiment family — 1-shot, 2-shot, 5-shot, 10-shot, then fractional and full label budgets — in one training process.
  • Adding a new task or algorithm requires only a new task JSON and algorithm module; the active-learning budget loop is task-agnostic.
  • The same configuration can carry an experiment beyond few-shot into a conventional many-shot regime, making few-shot and full-dataset results directly comparable in a single run.
  • Domain-adapt few-shot benchmarks become reproducible across three tasks in one codebase, with per-algorithm dependency pinning for consistent environments.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The 'domain adaptation' label for object detection and video classification may be doing less work than for image classification; a stronger test would insert an explicit source-target alignment loss (adversarial or contrastive) and measure the gain over plain fine-tuning.
  • The incremental-budget design makes it natural to compare active-learning query strategies under controlled label budgets, a comparison the current benchmarks do not isolate.
  • Because the paper cites a prior unified framework covering image classification and object detection, the 'first' claim rests on the addition of video classification and the incremental domain-adapt budget loop; a reader should weigh the novelty accordingly.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper introduces LEARN, a modular PyTorch/Hydra-based framework for few-shot learning with optional domain adaptation, supporting image classification, object detection, and video classification. The framework provides incremental n-shot label-budget workflows, multi-stage base/adapt configurations, self-supervised pretraining options, and active-learning-style querying. Benchmarks are reported for MetaBaseline, MME, and PACMAC on image classification datasets (DomainNet, Office-Home, Office-31), for DETReg and CutLER on object detection datasets (PoolCar, xView), and for X-Clip, TimeSformer, and CoMix on UCF101. The central claim is that LEARN is the first unified framework combining domain adaptation with few-shot learning across three vision tasks.

Significance. If fully substantiated, LEARN would be a valuable contribution: a single configurable system for running few-shot benchmarks across tasks, with explicit support for incremental label budgets and SSL pretraining. The paper's strengths are the public code release, the breadth of algorithms and datasets covered, and the detailed Hydra configuration protocol. However, the load-bearing claim that domain adaptation is supported for all three tasks is not backed by evidence for object detection and video classification, and the experimental evaluation lacks repeated trials and reproducibility artifacts. The contribution is currently demonstrated for image classification domain adaptation plus few-shot transfer on the other two tasks; with revision, the framework may still be a useful software contribution.

major comments (5)
  1. [Section 4, Table 2, Figure 2] The central claim of domain adaptation across three tasks is not supported for object detection and video classification. Section 4 states that the OD and VC algorithms were selected for 'self-supervised pre-training capability,' not for domain adaptation. Table 2 lists 'Adapt Target: N/A' for every OD and VC row, and Figure 2 describes OD as 'Fine-tune on target domain' and VC as 'Contrastive learning mixing in frames from source domain.' Self-supervised pretraining followed by fine-tuning on labeled target data is standard transfer learning, not domain adaptation; no explicit source-target alignment or use of unlabeled target data is demonstrated for these tasks. Please either add DA mechanisms with results for OD and VC, or revise the abstract, title, and introduction to claim a multi-task few-shot framework with domain adaptation for image classification and SSL pretraining for the other two tasks.
  2. [Section 6.2] The sentence 'In each of our few-shot experiments we show that the model scores at least 79% of the accuracy that is achieved on the full dataset' is contradicted by Table 2. DETReg on PoolCar obtains mAP 0.22 at 1-shot versus 0.90 at the full N budget (~24% of full performance), and CutLER similarly obtains 0.23 versus 0.89. Please correct this claim or restrict it to the classification and video-classification results.
  3. [Section 6, Table 2] All reported results are single runs. Few-shot learning is highly sensitive to the random selection of support examples and to training stochasticity; the differences between MME and PACMAC on Office-Home (0.638 vs 0.494 at 1-shot) or between algorithms on UCF101 could be within noise. Please report means and standard deviations over multiple seeds, and specify the random-seed protocol.
  4. [Sections 6.1 and 7] The paper points to a public repository but provides no commit hash, no checksums, and no exact Hydra commands or configuration files needed to reproduce Table 2. Since the paper's contribution is a software framework and Section 7 claims that the dependency specification 'guarantees consistent training and use,' the manuscript should include a versioned code identifier and the full experimental configuration for each row of Table 2.
  5. [Section 2 and abstract] The 'first unified framework' claim rests on a comparison with only LibFewShot, learn2learn, and the framework of Lin et al. There is no systematic survey of other transfer-learning or domain-adaptation toolkits (for example, domain-adaptation libraries such as Dassl or the Transfer Learning Library), nor of the few-shot domain adaptation literature. The novelty claim should either be supported by a broader comparison or explicitly qualified.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Table 2] The column layout is very hard to read: for the MME rows, the Source/Target/Base Target/Adapt Target entries (e.g., 'DomainNet-Real DomainNet-ClipArt DomainNet-Sketch') run together, making it unclear which domains are the source, base target, and adapt target. Please split these into separate columns or use a clearer table format.
  2. [Section 6.2] The statement 'In total, we train 8 networks on 6 different datasets' does not match Table 2, which reports results for 14 algorithm-dataset combinations (9 image classification, 2 object detection, 3 video classification). Please clarify whether some rows share a network or correct the count.
  3. [Section 1] The text refers to 'mini-Imagenet [13]', but reference [13] is Dhillon et al.'s baseline paper, not the original mini-ImageNet source; please cite the original dataset reference (e.g., Vinyals et al. [63]) or the appropriate source.
  4. [Sections 1 and 5] 'HMBD' is a typo for 'HMDB' (reference [31]).
  5. [Section 7] The mention of a 'zero-shot image classification task' is only an aside and is not described in the framework or experiments; please either define how zero-shot is supported or remove the aside.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: LEARN is a software/benchmarking framework paper, and its central claims are empirical assertions about system capabilities rather than derivations from fitted inputs.

full rationale

The paper does not present a mathematical derivation chain, fitted parameters, or a predictive model whose outputs are constructed from its inputs. Its contributions are framework design, configuration options, and benchmark results comparing existing algorithms on public datasets. There is no load-bearing self-citation: the related-work comparison to LibFewShot and learn2learn is external, and the 'first unified framework' claim is a positioning statement based on a literature comparison, not on a theorem imported from prior work by the same authors. The main substantive concern raised by a critical reader is that the object detection and video classification pipelines are described as self-supervised pre-training plus fine-tuning rather than explicit domain adaptation, and Table 2 lists Base Target and Adapt Target as 'N/A' for those rows. That is a possible overstatement of the framework's domain-adaptation coverage, but it is a claim-evidence mismatch, not circularity: the benchmark numbers still come from running external algorithms on public datasets, and no result is equivalent to its own input by construction. Accordingly, no circular step meets the evidentiary bar required by the analysis.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces a software framework, not new mathematical or physical entities. There are no fitted parameters. The central claim rests on the validity of the integrated external algorithms, the interpretation of self-supervised fine-tuning as domain adaptation, and the consistency of the benchmark setup.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The external few-shot and domain adaptation algorithms behave as described in their original publications when run inside LEARN.
    The paper benchmarks MME, PACMAC, DETReg, CutLER, X-Clip, TimeSformer, and CoMix as implemented in the framework but does not validate these implementations against the original results.
  • domain assumption The task workflow in Figure 2 correctly represents domain adaptation for all three tasks.
    Section 3.1.2 describes each stage as domain adaptation, but object detection and video classification are described as self-supervised pre-training plus fine-tuning.
  • domain assumption The benchmark datasets and splits are used consistently with standard practice.
    Section 5 describes datasets but does not specify exact train/test splits for the few-shot protocols beyond 'seed budgets'.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of LEARN: A Unified Framework for Multi-Task Domain Adapt Few-Shot Learning." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/K2M77P7Z

@misc{pith2026241216275,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: LEARN: A Unified Framework for Multi-Task Domain Adapt Few-Shot Learning},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/K2M77P7Z}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.16275}
}
abstract

Both few-shot learning and domain adaptation sub-fields in Computer Vision have seen significant recent progress in terms of the availability of state-of-the-art algorithms and datasets. Frameworks have been developed for each sub-field; however, building a common system or framework that combines both is something that has not been explored. As part of our research, we present the first unified framework that combines domain adaptation for the few-shot learning setting across 3 different tasks - image classification, object detection and video classification. Our framework is highly modular with the capability to support few-shot learning with/without the inclusion of domain adaptation depending on the algorithm. Furthermore, the most important configurable feature of our framework is the on-the-fly setup for incremental $n$-shot tasks with the optional capability to configure the system to scale to a traditional many-shot task. With more focus on Self-Supervised Learning (SSL) for current few-shot learning approaches, our system also supports multiple SSL pre-training configurations. To test our framework's capabilities, we provide benchmarks on a wide range of algorithms and datasets across different task and problem settings. The code is open source has been made publicly available here: https://gitlab.kitware.com/darpa_learn/learn

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.16275 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The LEARN Framework Concept Figure showing the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Task workflow across the different tasks - [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Overview of the image domains across the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Qualitative results for the Few-Shot Domain Adapt Im [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Qualitative results (GT, Detections) for the Self￾Supervised Pretraining Object Detection task using the Cut￾LER [68] algorithm on the (A) Pool and Car (B) xView datasets. has specific dependencies installed as part of the setup pro￾cess. With the help of the configura…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Unsupervised robust domain adaptation with- out source data

    Peshal Agarwal, Danda Pani Paudel, Jan-Nico Zaech, and Luc Van Gool. Unsupervised robust domain adaptation with- out source data. In WACV, pages 2009–2018, 2022. 2

    2009

  2. [2]

    Com- positional mixture representations for vision and text

    Stephan Alaniz, Marco Federici, and Zeynep Akata. Com- positional mixture representations for vision and text. In CVPRW, pages 4201–4210, 2022. 5, 8

    2022

  3. [3]

    S ´ebastien M. R. Arnold, Praateek Mahajan, Debajyoti Datta, Ian Bunner, and Konstantinos Saitas Zarkias. learn2learn: A library for meta-learning research. CoRR, abs/2008.12284,

    arXiv 2008

  4. [4]

    Reed, Roei Herzig, Gal Chechik, Anna Rohrbach, Trevor Darrell, and Amir Globerson

    Amir Bar, Xin Wang, Vadim Kantorov, Colorado J. Reed, Roei Herzig, Gal Chechik, Anna Rohrbach, Trevor Darrell, and Amir Globerson. Detreg: Unsupervised pretraining with region priors for object detection. In CVPR, pages 14585– 14595, 2022. 1, 5, 7, 8

    2022

  5. [5]

    Is space-time attention all you need for video understanding? In ICML, pages 813–824, 2021

    Gedas Bertasius, Heng Wang, and Lorenzo Torresani. Is space-time attention all you need for video understanding? In ICML, pages 813–824, 2021. 5, 7, 8

    2021

  6. [6]

    Swimming pool and car detec- tion

    KARTIK BHARTIY A. Swimming pool and car detec- tion. https : / / www . kaggle . com / datasets / kbhartiya83 / swimming - pool - and - car - detection. 6, 7

    work page

  7. [7]

    Few-shot video classification via tem- poral alignment

    Kaidi Cao, Jingwei Ji, Zhangjie Cao, Chien-Yi Chang, and Juan Carlos Niebles. Few-shot video classification via tem- poral alignment. In CVPR, pages 10618–10627, 2020. 1

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Unsupervised learn- ing of visual features by contrasting cluster assignments

    Mathilde Caron, Ishan Misra, Julien Mairal, Priya Goyal, Pi- otr Bojanowski, and Armand Joulin. Unsupervised learn- ing of visual features by contrasting cluster assignments. In NeurIPS, 2020. 6

    work page 2020

Show all 84 references
  1. [9]

    Emerg- ing properties in self-supervised vision transformers

    Mathilde Caron, Hugo Touvron, Ishan Misra, Herv ´e J´egou, Julien Mairal, Piotr Bojanowski, and Armand Joulin. Emerg- ing properties in self-supervised vision transformers. In ICCV, pages 9650–9660, 2021. 5

    2021

  2. [10]

    Fewshotqa: A sim- ple framework for few-shot learning of question answering tasks using pre-trained text-to-text models

    Rakesh Chada and Pradeep Natarajan. Fewshotqa: A sim- ple framework for few-shot learning of question answering tasks using pre-trained text-to-text models. InEMNLP, pages 6081–6090, 2021. 2

    2021

  3. [11]

    Meta-baseline: Exploring simple meta- learning for few-shot learning

    Yinbo Chen, Zhuang Liu, Huijuan Xu, Trevor Darrell, and Xiaolong Wang. Meta-baseline: Exploring simple meta- learning for few-shot learning. In ICCV, pages 9062–9071,

  4. [12]

    The cityscapes dataset for semantic urban scene understanding

    Marius Cordts, Mohamed Omran, Sebastian Ramos, Timo Rehfeld, Markus Enzweiler, Rodrigo Benenson, Uwe Franke, Stefan Roth, and Bernt Schiele. The cityscapes dataset for semantic urban scene understanding. In CVPR, pages 3213–3223, 2016. 2

    2016

  5. [13]

    A baseline for few-shot image clas- sification

    Guneet Singh Dhillon, Pratik Chaudhari, Avinash Ravichan- dran, and Stefano Soatto. A baseline for few-shot image clas- sification. In ICLR, 2020. 1

    2020

  6. [14]

    Cian Eastwood, Ian Mason, Christopher K. I. Williams, and Bernhard Sch¨olkopf. Source-free adaptation to measurement shift via bottom-up feature restoration. In ICLR, 2022. 2

    2022

  7. [15]

    Mark Everingham, Luc Van Gool, Christopher K. I. Williams, John M. Winn, and Andrew Zisserman. The pascal visual object classes (VOC) challenge.IJCV, 88(2):303–338,

  8. [16]

    Unsupervised domain adaptation by statistics alignment for deep sleep staging networks

    Jiahao Fan, Hangyu Zhu, Xinyu Jiang, Long Meng, Chen Chen, Cong Fu, Huan Yu, Chenyun Dai, and Wei Chen. Unsupervised domain adaptation by statistics alignment for deep sleep staging networks. TNSRE, 30:205–216, 2022. 2

    2022

  9. [17]

    Model- agnostic meta-learning for fast adaptation of deep networks

    Chelsea Finn, Pieter Abbeel, and Sergey Levine. Model- agnostic meta-learning for fast adaptation of deep networks. In ICML, pages 1126–1135, 2017. 2

    2017

  10. [18]

    Deep residual learning for image recognition

    Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In CVPR, pages 770–778, 2016. 4

    2016

  11. [19]

    Masked autoencoders are scalable vision learners

    Kaiming He, Xinlei Chen, Saining Xie, Yanghao Li, Piotr Doll´ar, and Ross Girshick. Masked autoencoders are scalable vision learners. In CVPR, pages 16000–16009, 2022. 5

    2022

  12. [20]

    Hospedales

    Shell Xu Hu, Da Li, Jan St ¨uhmer, Minyoung Kim, and Tim- othy M. Hospedales. Pushing the limits of simple pipelines for few-shot learning: External data and fine-tuning make a difference. In CVPR, pages 9058–9067, 2022. 1

    2022

  13. [21]

    Model adaptation: Historical contrastive learning for unsu- pervised domain adaptation without source data

    Jiaxing Huang, Dayan Guan, Aoran Xiao, and Shijian Lu. Model adaptation: Historical contrastive learning for unsu- pervised domain adaptation without source data. NeurIPS, 34:3635–3649, 2021. 2

    2021

  14. [22]

    Jonathan J. Hull. A database for handwritten text recognition research. TPAMI, 16(5):550–554, 1994. 1, 2

    1994

  15. [23]

    Hydra - a framework for elegantly configur- ing complex applications

    Hydra. Hydra - a framework for elegantly configur- ing complex applications. https : / / github . com / facebookresearch/hydra. 3

  16. [24]

    Cross-domain weakly-supervised object de- tection through progressive domain adaptation

    Naoto Inoue, Ryosuke Furuta, Toshihiko Yamasaki, and Kiy- oharu Aizawa. Cross-domain weakly-supervised object de- tection through progressive domain adaptation. In CVPR, pages 5001–5009, 2018. 2

    2018

  17. [25]

    Source-free domain adaptation via distributional alignment by matching batch normalization statistics

    Masato Ishii and Masashi Sugiyama. Source-free domain adaptation via distributional alignment by matching batch normalization statistics. CoRR, abs/2101.10842, 2021. 2

    2021 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Driving in the matrix: Can virtual worlds replace human- generated annotations for real world tasks? In ICRA, pages 746–753, 2017

    Matthew Johnson-Roberson, Charles Barto, Rounak Mehta, Sharath Nittur Sridhar, Karl Rosaen, and Ram Vasudevan. Driving in the matrix: Can virtual worlds replace human- generated annotations for real world tasks? In ICRA, pages 746–753, 2017. 2

    2017

  19. [27]

    The kinetics human action video dataset

    Will Kay, Jo ˜ao Carreira, Karen Simonyan, Brian Zhang, Chloe Hillier, Sudheendra Vijayanarasimhan, Fabio Viola, Tim Green, Trevor Back, Paul Natsev, Mustafa Suleyman, and Andrew Zisserman. The kinetics human action video dataset. CoRR, abs/1705.06950, 2017. 2

    2017 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Novel dataset for fine-grained image categorization: Stanford dogs

    Aditya Khosla, Nityananda Jayadevaprakash, Bangpeng Yao, and Fei-Fei Li. Novel dataset for fine-grained image categorization: Stanford dogs. In CVPRW, 2011. 2 9

    2011

  21. [29]

    3d object representations for fine-grained categorization

    Jonathan Krause, Michael Stark, Jia Deng, and Li Fei-Fei. 3d object representations for fine-grained categorization. In ICCVW, pages 554–561. IEEE Computer Society, 2013. 2

    2013

  22. [30]

    Learning multiple layers of features from tiny images, 2009

    Alex Krizhevsky, Geoffrey Hinton, et al. Learning multiple layers of features from tiny images, 2009. 1

    2009

  23. [31]

    Poggio, and Thomas Serre

    Hildegard Kuehne, Hueihan Jhuang, Est ´ıbaliz Garrote, Tomaso A. Poggio, and Thomas Serre. HMDB: A large video database for human motion recognition. In ICCV, pages 2556–2563, 2011. 2

    2011

  24. [32]

    Towards a framework for privacy-preserving pedes- trian analysis

    Anil Kunchala, M ´elanie Bouroche, and Bianca Schoen- Phelan. Towards a framework for privacy-preserving pedes- trian analysis. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Con- ference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), pages 4370–4380, 2023

    2023

  25. [33]

    Looking back at labels: A class based domain adaptation technique

    Vinod Kumar Kurmi and Vinay P Namboodiri. Looking back at labels: A class based domain adaptation technique. In IJCNN, pages 1–8, 2019. 2

    2019

  26. [34]

    xview: Objects in context in overhead imagery

    Darius Lam, Richard Kuzma, Kevin McGee, Samuel Doo- ley, Michael Laielli, Matthew Klaric, Yaroslav Bulatov, and Brendan McCord. xview: Objects in context in overhead imagery. CoRR, abs/1802.07856, 2018. 6, 7

    2018 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Gradient-based learning applied to document recog- nition

    Yann LeCun, L ´eon Bottou, Yoshua Bengio, and Patrick Haffner. Gradient-based learning applied to document recog- nition. Proceedings of the IEEE , 86(11):2278–2324, 1998. 1, 2

    1998

  28. [36]

    Meta-learning with differentiable convex op- timization

    Kwonjoon Lee, Subhransu Maji, Avinash Ravichandran, and Stefano Soatto. Meta-learning with differentiable convex op- timization. In CVPR, pages 10657–10665, 2019. 2

    2019

  29. [37]

    Libfewshot: A comprehen- sive library for few-shot learning

    Wenbin Li, Chuanqi Dong, Pinzhuo Tian, Tiexin Qin, Xuesong Yang, Ziyi Wang, Jing Huo, Yinghuan Shi, Lei Wang, Yang Gao, and Jiebo Luo. Libfewshot: A comprehen- sive library for few-shot learning. CoRR, abs/2109.04898,

    arXiv

  30. [38]

    Meta- sgd: Learning to learn quickly for few shot learning

    Zhenguo Li, Fengwei Zhou, Fei Chen, and Hang Li. Meta- sgd: Learning to learn quickly for few shot learning. CoRR, abs/1707.09835, 2017. 2

    2017 arXiv

  31. [39]

    KITTI-360: A novel dataset and benchmarks for urban scene understanding in 2d and 3d

    Yiyi Liao, Jun Xie, and Andreas Geiger. KITTI-360: A novel dataset and benchmarks for urban scene understanding in 2d and 3d. TPAMI, 45(3):3292–3310, 2023. 2

    2023

  32. [40]

    A unified frame- work with meta-dropout for few-shot learning

    Shaobo Lin, Xingyu Zeng, and Rui Zhao. A unified frame- work with meta-dropout for few-shot learning. CoRR, abs/2210.06409, 2022. 2

    2022 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Graph consistency based mean-teaching for unsupervised domain adaptive person re- identification

    Xiaobin Liu and Shiliang Zhang. Graph consistency based mean-teaching for unsupervised domain adaptive person re- identification. In IJCAI, pages 874–880, 2021. 2

    2021

  34. [42]

    Expanding language-image pretrained models for gen- eral video recognition, 2022

    Bolin Ni, Houwen Peng, Minghao Chen, Songyang Zhang, Gaofeng Meng, Jianlong Fu, Shiming Xiang, and Haibin Ling. Expanding language-image pretrained models for gen- eral video recognition, 2022. 5, 8

    2022

  35. [43]

    Sindagi, Vibashan VS, and Vishal M

    Poojan Oza, Vishwanath A. Sindagi, Vibashan VS, and Vishal M. Patel. Unsupervised domain adaptation of object detectors: A survey, 2021. 2

    2021

  36. [44]

    Multi-adversarial domain adaptation

    Zhongyi Pei, Zhangjie Cao, Mingsheng Long, and Jianmin Wang. Multi-adversarial domain adaptation. In AAAI, pages 3934–3941, 2018. 1

    2018

  37. [45]

    Visda: The visual domain adaptation challenge

    Xingchao Peng, Ben Usman, Neela Kaushik, Judy Hoffman, Dequan Wang, and Kate Saenko. Visda: The visual domain adaptation challenge. CoRR, abs/1710.06924, 2017. 5

    2017 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Moment matching for multi-source domain adaptation

    Xingchao Peng, Qinxun Bai, Xide Xia, Zijun Huang, Kate Saenko, and Bo Wang. Moment matching for multi-source domain adaptation. In ICCV, pages 1406–1415, 2019. 1, 2, 5, 6, 8

    2019

  39. [47]

    Adapting self-supervised vision transformers by probing attention-conditioned masking consistency

    Viraj Uday Prabhu, Sriram Yenamandra, Aaditya Singh, and Judy Hoffman. Adapting self-supervised vision transformers by probing attention-conditioned masking consistency. In NeurIPS, 2022. 5, 7, 8

    2022

  40. [48]

    Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision

    Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh, Gabriel Goh, Sandhini Agarwal, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Pamela Mishkin, Jack Clark, Gretchen Krueger, and Ilya Sutskever. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In ICML, pages 8748–...

    2021

  41. [49]

    Tenenbaum, Hugo Larochelle, and Richard S

    Mengye Ren, Eleni Triantafillou, Sachin Ravi, Jake Snell, Kevin Swersky, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, Hugo Larochelle, and Richard S. Zemel. Meta-learning for semi-supervised few- shot classification. In ICLR, 2018. 2, 4

    2018

  42. [50]

    Imagenet large scale visual recognition challenge.IJCV, 115:211–252,

    Olga Russakovsky, Jia Deng, Hao Su, Jonathan Krause, San- jeev Satheesh, Sean Ma, Zhiheng Huang, Andrej Karpa- thy, Aditya Khosla, Michael Bernstein, et al. Imagenet large scale visual recognition challenge.IJCV, 115:211–252,

  43. [51]

    Adapting visual category models to new domains

    Kate Saenko, Brian Kulis, Mario Fritz, and Trevor Darrell. Adapting visual category models to new domains. In ECCV, pages 213–226, 2010. 2, 5, 6, 8

    2010

  44. [52]

    Semi-supervised domain adaptation via minimax entropy

    Kuniaki Saito, Donghyun Kim, Stan Sclaroff, Trevor Darrell, and Kate Saenko. Semi-supervised domain adaptation via minimax entropy. In ICCV, pages 8050–8058, 2019. 4, 8

    2019

  45. [53]

    Seman- tic foggy scene understanding with synthetic data.IJCV, 126 (9):973–992, 2018

    Christos Sakaridis, Dengxin Dai, and Luc Van Gool. Seman- tic foggy scene understanding with synthetic data.IJCV, 126 (9):973–992, 2018. 2

    2018

  46. [54]

    Normalized cuts and image segmentation

    Jianbo Shi and Jitendra Malik. Normalized cuts and image segmentation. TPAMI, 22(8):888–905, 2000. 6

    2000

  47. [55]

    Mondal, and Jy- oti Prakash Sahoo

    Yisheng Song, Ting Wang, Subrota K. Mondal, and Jy- oti Prakash Sahoo. A comprehensive survey of few-shot learning: Evolution, applications, challenges, and opportu- nities. CoRR, abs/2205.06743, 2022. 1

    2022 arXiv

  48. [56]

    UCF101: A dataset of 101 human actions classes from videos in the wild

    Khurram Soomro, Amir Roshan Zamir, and Mubarak Shah. UCF101: A dataset of 101 human actions classes from videos in the wild. CoRR, abs/1212.0402, 2012. 2, 6, 7

    2012 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Discriminative adversarial domain adaptation

    Hui Tang and Kui Jia. Discriminative adversarial domain adaptation. In AAAI, pages 5940–5947, 2020. 2

    2020

  50. [58]

    Model adaptation through hypothesis transfer with gradual knowledge distillation

    Song Tang, Yuji Shi, Zhiyuan Ma, Jian Li, Jianzhi Lyu, Qingdu Li, and Jianwei Zhang. Model adaptation through hypothesis transfer with gradual knowledge distillation. In IROS, pages 5679–5685, 2021. 2

    2021

  51. [59]

    Meta-dataset: A dataset of datasets for learning to learn from few examples

    Eleni Triantafillou, Tyler Zhu, Vincent Dumoulin, Pascal Lamblin, Utku Evci, Kelvin Xu, Ross Goroshin, Carles Gelada, Kevin Swersky, Pierre-Antoine Manzagol, and Hugo Larochelle. Meta-dataset: A dataset of datasets for learning to learn from few examples. In ICLR, 2020. 1

    2020

  52. [60]

    Adversarial discriminative domain adaptation

    Eric Tzeng, Judy Hoffman, Kate Saenko, and Trevor Darrell. Adversarial discriminative domain adaptation. In CVPR, pages 7167–7176, 2017. 1

    2017

  53. [61]

    Jasper R. R. Uijlings, Koen E. A. van de Sande, Theo Gevers, and Arnold W. M. Smeulders. Selective search for object recognition. IJCV, 104(2):154–171, 2013. 5 10

    2013

  54. [62]

    Deep hashing network for unsupervised domain adaptation

    Hemanth Venkateswara, Jose Eusebio, Shayok Chakraborty, and Sethuraman Panchanathan. Deep hashing network for unsupervised domain adaptation. In CVPR, pages 5018– 5027, 2017. 2, 5, 6, 8

    2017

  55. [63]

    Matching networks for one shot learning

    Oriol Vinyals, Charles Blundell, Tim Lillicrap, Koray Kavukcuoglu, and Daan Wierstra. Matching networks for one shot learning. In NeurIPS, pages 3630–3638, 2016. 1

    2016

  56. [64]

    Matching networks for one shot learning

    Oriol Vinyals, Charles Blundell, Timothy Lillicrap, Daan Wierstra, et al. Matching networks for one shot learning. In NeurIPS, 2016. 2, 4

    2016

  57. [65]

    Visda2019 - visual domain adaptation chal- lenge

    VisDA2019. Visda2019 - visual domain adaptation chal- lenge. https://ai.bu.edu/visda-2019/. 2

    2019

  58. [66]

    Belongie

    Catherine Wah, Steve Branson, Peter Welinder, Pietro Per- ona, and Serge J. Belongie. The caltech-ucsd birds-200-2011 dataset, 2011. 2

    2011

  59. [67]

    Cross-domain contrastive learning for unsupervised domain adaptation

    Rui Wang, Zuxuan Wu, Zejia Weng, Jingjing Chen, Guo-Jun Qi, and Yu-Gang Jiang. Cross-domain contrastive learning for unsupervised domain adaptation. TMM, 2022. 2

    2022

  60. [68]

    Yu, and Ishan Misra

    Xudong Wang, Rohit Girdhar, Stella X. Yu, and Ishan Misra. Cut and learn for unsupervised object detection and instance segmentation. CoRR, abs/2301.11320, 2023. 6, 7, 8

    2023 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Msmcnet: A modular few-shot learning framework for signal modulation classification

    Yiran Wang, Jing Bai, Zhu Xiao, Huaji Zhou, and Licheng Jiao. Msmcnet: A modular few-shot learning framework for signal modulation classification. TSP, 70:3789–3801, 2022. 2

    2022

  62. [70]

    Zeya Wang, Baoyu Jing, Yang Ni, Nanqing Dong, Pengtao Xie, and Eric P. Xing. Adversarial domain adaptation be- ing aware of class relationships. In ECAI, pages 1579–1586,

  63. [71]

    Adap- tive adversarial network for source-free domain adaptation

    Haifeng Xia, Handong Zhao, and Zhengming Ding. Adap- tive adversarial network for source-free domain adaptation. In ICCV, pages 9010–9019, 2021. 2

    2021

  64. [72]

    Source data-free domain adaptation of object detector through domain-specific perturbation

    Lin Xiong, Mao Ye, Dan Zhang, Yan Gan, Xue Li, and Yingying Zhu. Source data-free domain adaptation of object detector through domain-specific perturbation. Int. J. Intell. Syst., 36(8):3746–3766, 2021. 2

    2021

  65. [73]

    ARID: A new dataset for recog- nizing action in the dark

    Yuecong Xu, Jianfei Yang, Haozhi Cao, Kezhi Mao, Jianx- iong Yin, and Simon See. ARID: A new dataset for recog- nizing action in the dark. CoRR, abs/2006.03876, 2020. 2

    2006 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Video unsupervised domain adapta- tion with deep learning: A comprehensive survey

    Yuecong Xu, Haozhi Cao, Zhenghua Chen, Xiaoli Li, Lihua Xie, and Jianfei Yang. Video unsupervised domain adapta- tion with deep learning: A comprehensive survey. CoRR, abs/2211.10412, 2022. 2

    2022 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Aligning correlation information for domain adaptation in action recognition

    Yuecong Xu, Haozhi Cao, Kezhi Mao, Zhenghua Chen, Li- hua Xie, and Jianfei Yang. Aligning correlation information for domain adaptation in action recognition. TNNLS, pages 1–12, 2022. 2

    2022

  68. [76]

    Transformer-based source- free domain adaptation

    Guanglei Yang, Hao Tang, Zhun Zhong, Mingli Ding, Ling Shao, Nicu Sebe, and Elisa Ricci. Transformer-based source- free domain adaptation. CoRR, abs/2105.14138, 2021. 2

    2021 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Interact before align: Leveraging cross-modal knowledge for domain adaptive action recognition

    Lijin Yang, Yifei Huang, Yusuke Sugano, and Yoichi Sato. Interact before align: Leveraging cross-modal knowledge for domain adaptive action recognition. In CVPR, pages 14702– 14712, 2022. 2

    2022

  70. [78]

    Unsupervised domain adaptation for one-stage object detector using offsets to bounding box

    Jayeon Yoo, Inseop Chung, and Nojun Kwak. Unsupervised domain adaptation for one-stage object detector using offsets to bounding box. In ECCV, pages 691–708, 2022. 2

    2022

  71. [79]

    BDD100K: A diverse driving dataset for heterogeneous multitask learning

    Fisher Yu, Haofeng Chen, Xin Wang, Wenqi Xian, Yingying Chen, Fangchen Liu, Vashisht Madhavan, and Trevor Dar- rell. BDD100K: A diverse driving dataset for heterogeneous multitask learning. In CVPR, pages 2633–2642, 2020. 2

    2020

  72. [80]

    Source-free domain adaptation for real-world image dehazing

    Hu Yu, Jie Huang, Yajing Liu, Qi Zhu, Man Zhou, and Feng Zhao. Source-free domain adaptation for real-world image dehazing. In MM, pages 6645–6654, 2022. 2

    2022

  73. [81]

    Source-style transferred mean teacher for source-data free object detection

    Dan Zhang, Mao Ye, Lin Xiong, Shuaifeng Li, and Xue Li. Source-style transferred mean teacher for source-data free object detection. In MMAsia, pages 4:1–4:8, 2021. 2

    2021

  74. [82]

    Inpaint2learn: A self-supervised framework for affordance learning

    Lingzhi Zhang, Weiyu Du, Shenghao Zhou, Jiancong Wang, and Jianbo Shi. Inpaint2learn: A self-supervised framework for affordance learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), pages 2665–2674, 2022

    2022

  75. [83]

    Robust re-weighting prototypical networks for few-shot clas- sification

    Junjie Zhu, Xiaodong Yi, Naiyang Guan, and Hang Cheng. Robust re-weighting prototypical networks for few-shot clas- sification. In ICRAI, pages 140–146, 2020. 2

    2020

  76. [84]

    A closer look at few-shot video classification: A new baseline and benchmark

    Zhenxi Zhu, Limin Wang, Sheng Guo, and Gangshan Wu. A closer look at few-shot video classification: A new baseline and benchmark. In BMVC, page 237, 2021. 1 11

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.