Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Label Privacy in Split Learning for Large Models with Parameter-Efficient Training

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.16669 v1 pith:4BMIRKHB submitted 2024-12-21 cs.LG cs.CR

Label Privacy in Split Learning for Large Models with Parameter-Efficient Training

classification cs.LG cs.CR
keywords fine-tuninglearningprivacylargemodelmodelsparameter-efficienttraining
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

As deep learning models become larger and more expensive, many practitioners turn to fine-tuning APIs. These web services allow fine-tuning a model between two parties: the client that provides the data, and the server that hosts the model. While convenient, these APIs raise a new concern: the data of the client is at risk of privacy breach during the training procedure. This challenge presents an important practical case of vertical federated learning, where the two parties perform parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) of a large model. In this study, we systematically search for a way to fine-tune models over an API while keeping the labels private. We analyze the privacy of LoRA, a popular approach for parameter-efficient fine-tuning when training over an API. Using this analysis, we propose P$^3$EFT, a multi-party split learning algorithm that takes advantage of existing PEFT properties to maintain privacy at a lower performance overhead. To validate our algorithm, we fine-tune DeBERTa-v2-XXLarge, Flan-T5 Large and LLaMA-2 7B using LoRA adapters on a range of NLP tasks. We find that P$^3$EFT is competitive with existing privacy-preserving methods in multi-party and two-party setups while having higher accuracy.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.