Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 82 references

Optical Properties and Spin States of Inter-layer Carbon Defect Pairs in Hexagonal Boron Nitride: A First-Principles Study

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Substitutional carbon dimers placed in different layers of hexagonal boron nitride can host a room-temperature triplet spin state and emit at a nearly fixed visible wavelength regardless of the carbon–carbon distance.

desk verdict New inter-layer carbon-dimer family with plausible but SCAN-dependent spin predictions; worth reviewing with a request for hybrid validation. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.17457 v2 pith:JNC4M4H4 submitted 2024-12-23 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hallquant-ph

Ignacio Chacon , Andrea Echeverri , Carlos Cardenas , Francisco Munoz This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.mes-hallquant-ph PACS 71.15.Mb71.55.-i78.55.-m
keywords hexagonalboronnitridecarbondefectssingle-photonemittersinter-layerdimersdensityfunctionaltheorytripletgroundstatezero-phononlineopticallydetectedmagneticresonance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Substitutional carbon atoms sitting in different layers of hexagonal boron nitride, rather than in the same layer, form a family of emitters with properties that have not been studied before. The paper predicts that when the two carbons replace the same species (both B or both N) and lie 3.5–7.1 Å apart, the pair has a triplet ground state whose singlet-triplet gap exceeds roughly 0.5 eV, so the spin degree of freedom survives at room temperature. At longer separations the same pairs become nearly degenerate weakly coupled S=1/2 centers with a zero-field splitting in the MHz range, which the paper offers as an explanation for some optically detected magnetic resonance (ODMR) signals in hBN. It also finds that the zero-phonon emission energy of these homonuclear dimers is nearly independent of the carbon-carbon distance, making each species emit almost monochromatically in the visible, and that specific aligned configurations show ~60 meV out-of-plane phonon replicas. A reader should care because carbon contamination is common in hBN, so these inter-layer dimers could be a realistic, controllable source of both spin and spectral stability.

What carries the argument

The central object is the inter-layer homonuclear carbon dimer C_X C_X, two substitutional carbons of the same species in different hBN layers whose electronic state is governed by exchange coupling between their defect levels. Because the two defects are identical, their one-electron states are degenerate; at short distance they split, and the triplet's antisymmetric spatial wavefunction develops a node between the carbons, lowering the electron density at the midpoint and interacting favorably with the polar hBN lattice, which stabilizes the triplet by more than ~0.5 eV. At larger separation the overlap and exchange decay, so the singlet and triplet become degenerate and the pair behaves as two weakly interacting S=1/2 centers with a point-dipole zero-field splitting that scales as $r^{{-3}}$. The optical and vibronic predictions use SCAN DFT with ΔSCF excited states and the Huang-Rhys generating-function formalism to build photoluminescence spectra.

What would settle it

A hybrid-functional or many-body calculation for a representative close dimer such as C_B C_B-(0,2) that finds a singlet ground state, or a singlet-triplet gap below 0.5 eV, would overturn the room-temperature spin-activity claim. On the experimental side, measuring the zero-phonon line of several C_X C_X emitters of the same species with different interlayer separations and finding a spread beyond roughly 0.1 eV, or detecting a zero-field splitting in the GHz rather than MHz range, would invalidate the distance-independence and weakly-coupled-pair predictions.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that neutral inter-layer dimers of identical carbon species, C_B C_B and C_N C_N, are viable magnetic single-photon emitters. For total C-C distances between about 3.5 and 7.1 Å these dimers are predicted to have a triplet ground state, with the singlet more than ~0.5 eV higher, making them spin-active above room temperature; the only apparent exception is C_N C_N-(1,1), where the two carbons form a direct covalent bond and become a singlet. Their zero-phonon line is almost distance-independent within each species—about 1.72 eV for C_B C_B and 1.80 eV for C_N C_N at the SCAN level, shifting to roughly 2.1–2.4 eV with HSE06—so the paper calls the emission nearly monochromatic in the visible. Beyond about 7 Å the exchange coupling between the two S=1/2 centers vanishes, singlet and triplet become degenerate, and the zero-field splitting drops to tens or hundreds of MHz, which the authors connect to ODMR observations of effectively weakly coupled spin pairs. In contrast, inter-layer C_N C_B donor-acceptor dimers remain singlet and emit in the 1.9–2.4 eV range with the usual high-energy phonon replicas.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the SCAN exchange-correlation functional correctly predicts the singlet-triplet energy differences and ground-state ordering of these inter-layer dimers; the paper reports that PBE fails qualitatively at large separations and that SCAN underestimates the hBN band gap by about 1 eV, and no hybrid or many-body benchmark is applied to these specific pair configurations.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Inter-layer C_B C_B and C_N C_N dimers at 3.5–7.1 Å provide spin-active single-photon emitters that remain in the triplet state at room temperature, with the singlet-triplet gap above ~0.5 eV.
  • Each homonuclear species emits at a nearly fixed zero-phonon energy (≈1.72 eV for C_B C_B, ≈1.80 eV for C_N C_N with SCAN), so ensembles containing a spread of interlayer spacings still give quasi-monochromatic visible emission.
  • At separations beyond ~7 Å these dimers become weakly coupled S=1/2 pairs with zero-field splittings of tens to hundreds of MHz, giving a concrete microscopic candidate for ODMR signals in hBN that have been attributed to small-ZFS or effectively S=1/2 defects.
  • The aligned geometries C_B C_B-(0,2) and C_B C_B-(1,1) have prominent out-of-plane phonon replicas near 60 meV, a distinct vibronic fingerprint that could identify inter-layer dimers and clarify the phonon sidebands of carbon-based yellow emitters.
  • Heteronuclear inter-layer C_N C_B dimers remain spinless donor-acceptor emitters, extending the known family of carbon-related SPEs in hBN to pairs that are not in the same layer.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial extension: if the zero-phonon energy is insensitive to interlayer distance, then irradiation or growth conditions that produce carbon pairs at random layer spacings would still yield spectrally narrow emission, making ensemble-level fabrication more forgiving than for intra-layer dimers.
  • Editorial extension: the predicted r^{-3} dependence of the zero-field splitting on C-C distance is directly testable by measuring D for individual emitters and correlating it with a structural readout such as the out-of-plane phonon replica energy, which should be largest for the aligned configurations.
  • Editorial extension: because SCAN underestimates the band gap and the paper checks the ZPL with HSE06 but not the singlet-triplet ordering, a natural next step is a hybrid or GW calculation of a few close dimers; the authors' weakest point is precisely the quantity on which the spin-activity conclusion depends.
  • Editorial extension: the ~60 meV out-of-plane mode suggests that the same defects could couple to mechanical motion of the bilayer, so future experiments might look for signatures of interlayer shear or breathing modes in the emission of carbon-implanted hBN.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper uses DFT with the SCAN functional to study neutral substitutional carbon dimer defects in hexagonal boron nitride in which the two carbon atoms reside in different layers. It classifies the dimers into three families: C_N C_B donor-acceptor pairs, which are predicted to have singlet ground states; and C_N C_N and C_B C_B homonuclear pairs, which for close inter-layer separations (roughly 3.5–7.1 Å) are predicted to have triplet ground states with singlet-triplet splittings larger than about 0.5 eV, becoming weakly interacting S = 1/2 pairs at larger separations. The paper also computes zero-phonon-line (ZPL) energies and phonon sidebands, finding nearly distance-independent ZPLs for the homonuclear pairs (about 1.72–1.80 eV with SCAN and 2.1–2.4 eV with HSE06) and identifying two C_B C_B configurations with low-energy out-of-plane phonon replicas. The results are compared qualitatively with experimental ODMR signals exhibiting small zero-field splittings and with the so-called yellow emitters.

Significance. If the spin-state predictions are robust, this work identifies a new class of spin-active single-photon emitters in hBN with room-temperature triplet ground states and nearly monochromatic visible emission, and it offers a concrete microscopic candidate for the weakly coupled S = 1/2 pairs invoked to explain small-ZFS ODMR signals. The study is novel because inter-layer carbon dimers have not been considered before, it uses the SCAN functional rather than the qualitatively failing PBE, and it provides input files for key calculations without fitting parameters beyond the spectral broadening. The falsifiable predictions (monochromatic ZPL, characteristic phonon sidebands, distance-dependent spin crossover) are clearly stated and could guide experiments.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section II.A, Fig. 2] The central claim that close inter-layer C_X C_X dimers have triplet ground states with singlet-triplet splittings above ~0.5 eV rests entirely on SCAN total-energy differences. The paper itself notes that PBE fails qualitatively at large separations and that SCAN underestimates the hBN band gap by about 1 eV, but no hybrid or wavefunction benchmark is provided for these spin splittings; HSE06 is used only for ZPL energies at SCAN geometries. For diradical-like defects, semilocal functionals can bias the relative stability of open-shell singlet and triplet states through self-interaction error, so the magnitude and even the sign of the splitting are not yet robust. I recommend computing HSE06 (or another hybrid) singlet-triplet energies for the key close-range configurations, or at least benchmarking against a correlated method on a cluster model; if that is not feasible, the conclusions should be correspondingly tempered.
  2. [Conclusions, Table I, Fig. 2] The conclusion states that homonuclear dimers 'likely have a triplet ground state for closer distances 3.5–7.1 Å' with separation 'more than ~0.5 eV' from the singlet. However, the C_N C_N–(1,1) configuration, with a C-C distance of 3.58 Å (Table I), is an explicit singlet ground state due to direct C-C bond formation, as shown in Fig. 2 and discussed in Section III. The distance-energy summary in the conclusion should be qualified to exclude such bonded configurations, or the range should be restricted to configurations without a direct covalent C-C bond.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section II.A] There are two typos: 'ab inito thermodynamics' should be 'ab initio thermodynamics', and 'V ASP' should be 'VASP'.
  2. [Section II.A] The manuscript first states that the stick spectrum is convoluted with a Gaussian of 25 meV FWHM, then later says 'The only free parameter is a thermal-like broadening of Sk, which we set to 25 meV (room temperature).' Please clarify whether the 25 meV is the Gaussian FWHM or an additional broadening applied to the Huang-Rhys factors.
  3. [Section III] The statement about the singlet/triplet spatial wavefunction and 'zero electron density at the midpoint' is a useful heuristic, but as written it could be misread as a property of the total charge density; consider reformulating to refer explicitly to the two-electron wavefunction in the Heitler-London limit.
  4. [Table I] For d = 0, the in-plane distance is 0, but the column header 'Distance d (Å)' does not specify that this is the in-plane projection; please clarify in the caption that d denotes the in-plane component of the C-C distance.
  5. [Section V] The claim that the 'yellow emitters' could correspond to out-of-plane distortions is speculative but clearly presented; consider adding a sentence noting that this hypothesis could be tested by calculating Huang-Rhys factors for candidate out-of-plane distorted defects.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

Independent first-principles computation; no fitted parameters enter the central spin-state or ZPL predictions; self-citations are contextual, not load-bearing.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. Spin-state ordering is obtained directly from SCAN total-energy differences between singlet and triplet states (Fig. 2); ZPL energies come from the ΔSCF method (Fig. 3, with HSE06 cross-checks in the SI); phonon sidebands follow from the Alkauskas generating-function formalism. The only adjustable quantity is the 25 meV Gaussian broadening used for spectral convolution, which does not enter the spin-state, ZPL, or Huang-Rhys predictions. No experimental ODMR or PL datum is fitted to set parameters in the central calculations; the connection to ODMR experiments is explicitly qualitative. The self-citations to [31], [51], and [57] provide mechanism analogies and methodological benchmarks from separate published calculations, but they are not used to define the singlet-triplet energy differences or ZPL values reported here. The acknowledged SCAN band-gap underestimation, the PBE failure at large separations, and the lack of hybrid benchmarks for the spin splittings are functional-accuracy/correctness concerns, not evidence of circularity. No prediction reduces by construction to an input.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The only hand-set parameter is a spectral broadening width. The axioms are standard domain assumptions in defect DFT studies, with the SCAN functional reliability being the most consequential for the central spin-state claim.

free parameters (1)
  • Spectral broadening FWHM = 25 meV
    Phenomenological broadening applied to the calculated stick spectrum to mimic homogeneous, inhomogeneous, and thermal effects; chosen as room temperature, not fitted to data.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption SCAN XC functional reliably describes defect levels and spin states in hBN
    The central triplet-stability result depends on the singlet-triplet gap from SCAN. The paper notes PBE fails qualitatively and SCAN underestimates the gap by ~1 eV, so this assumption is load-bearing.
  • domain assumption A 7x7 supercell with Gamma-point sampling is sufficient to converge defect energetics
    Small supercells or sparse k-sampling can introduce finite-size errors in defect-state energies; the paper does not report convergence tests.
  • domain assumption The Delta SCF method provides reliable excited-state energies for these defects
    Delta SCF has known issues with mixed-spin excited states, and the paper bounds the ZPL error to 0.2 eV in the supplementary material.
  • domain assumption Phonons are unchanged between ground and excited states
    The Alkauskas lineshape method assumes identical phonon modes in both states; this is an approximation for the phonon sideband predictions.
  • domain assumption Defects are charge neutral
    The study is restricted to neutral defects, while formation-energy analysis indicates charged states could be relevant under different chemical potentials.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Optical Properties and Spin States of Inter-layer Carbon Defect Pairs in Hexagonal Boron Nitride: A First-Principles Study." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JNC4M4H4

@misc{pith2026241217457,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Optical Properties and Spin States of Inter-layer Carbon Defect Pairs in Hexagonal Boron Nitride: A First-Principles Study},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JNC4M4H4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.17457}
}
abstract

Substitutional carbon defects in hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) are prominent single photon emitters (SPEs), and their potential for spin activity ($S\geq1$) is particularly intriguing. While studies have largely focused on intra-layer defects, we employ density functional theory (DFT) to investigate inter-layer dimers of identical carbon species (C$_X$C$_X$). We demonstrate that these C$_X$C$_X$ pairs can exhibit a stable triplet spin state at room temperature when closely spaced (e.g., within 3.5-7.1 {\AA}) across hBN layers. As their separation increases beyond this range (e.g., $>7$ {\AA}), they transition into weakly interacting $S=1/2$ pairs, characterized by singlet-triplet degeneracy. This regime is predicted to result in a very small zero-field splitting for the triplet manifold, offering a potential explanation for certain optically detected magnetic resonance (ODMR) signals. The zero-phonon line (ZPL) energy of these inter-layer C$_X$C$_X$ pairs is found to be practically monochromatic and within the visible range. Furthermore, we identify specific C$_B$C$_B$ inter-layer configurations exhibiting atypical low-energy phonon replicas due to out-of-plane vibrational coupling, a finding that may clarify the vibronic structure of other hBN emitters, such as the 'yellow emitters'.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.17457 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Geometry of the studied defects, neutral dimers [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Energy difference between the singlet and triplet state [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. ZPL Energy of the configurations, calculated with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (A) Photoluminescence spectra of C [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. In panels A and D, the energy levels of the defects [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    T. T. Tran, K. Bray, M. J. Ford, M. Toth, and I. Aharonovich, Quantum emission from hexagonal boron nitride monolayers, Nature Nanotechnology 11, 37 (2016)

    work page 2016

  2. [2]

    Aharonovich, J.-P

    I. Aharonovich, J.-P. Tetienne, and M. Toth, Quantum emitters in hexagonal boron nitride, Nano Letters 22, 10 9227 (2022)

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    brightness is the highest reported for a quantum emitter in the visible spectral range

    The conversion of d to ˚A is given in Table I. The C atoms can belong to adjacent layers (h = 1) or can be separated by an inner layer ( h = 2); see Fig. 1B-C. Thus, a given dimer defect can be identi- fied by C X CY –(d, h), with X, Y= {B, N}. A CXCY-(d,h) h=2 d CXCY-(d,h=2)B h=1d C CXCY-(d,h=1) FIG. 1. Geometry of the studied defects, neutral dimers CX ...

  4. [4]

    Mendelson, D

    N. Mendelson, D. Chugh, J. R. Reimers, T. S. Cheng, A. Gottscholl, H. Long, C. J. Mellor, A. Zettl, V. Dyakonov, P. H. Beton, et al., Identifying carbon as the source of visible single-photon emission from hexag- onal boron nitride, Nature materials 20, 321 (2021)

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    Z. Qiu, K. Vaklinova, P. Huang, M. Grzeszczyk, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K. S. Novoselov, J. Lu, and M. Koperski, Atomic and electronic structure of defects in hbn: Enhancing single-defect functionalities, ACS Nano 18, 24035 (2024)

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Linder¨ alv, W

    C. Linder¨ alv, W. Wieczorek, and P. Erhart, Vibrational signatures for the identification of single-photon emitters in hexagonal boron nitride, Phys. Rev. B 103, 115421 (2021)

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Weston, D

    L. Weston, D. Wickramaratne, M. Mackoit, A. Alka- uskas, and C. G. Van de Walle, Native point defects and impurities in hexagonal boron nitride, Phys. Rev. B 97, 214104 (2018)

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    X. Z. Du, J. Li, J. Y. Lin, and H. X. Jiang, The origin of deep-level impurity transitions in hexag- onal boron nitride, Applied Physics Letters 106, 021110 (2015), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/apl/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/1.4905908/14088224/021110 1 online.pdf

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4905908/14088224/021110 2015

Show all 82 references
  1. [9]

    Mackoit-Sinkeviˇ cien˙ e, M

    M. Mackoit-Sinkeviˇ cien˙ e, M. Maciaszek, C. G. Van de Walle, and A. Alkauskas, Carbon dimer defect as a source of the 4.1 eV luminescence in hexago- nal boron nitride, Applied Physics Letters 115, 212101 (2019), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/apl/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/1.5124153...

    2019 doi

  2. [10]

    D. Wong, J. J. Velasco, L. Ju, J. Lee, S. Kahn, H.-Z. Tsai, C. Germany, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, A. Zettl, F. Wang, and M. F. Crommie, Nature Nanotechnology 10, 949 (2015)

    2015

  3. [11]

    Bourrellier, S

    R. Bourrellier, S. Meuret, A. Tararan, O. St´ ephan, M. Kociak, L. H. G. Tizei, and A. Zobelli, Bright uv single photon emission at point defects in h-bn, Nano Letters 16, 4317 (2016)

    2016

  4. [12]

    Fischer, A

    M. Fischer, A. Sajid, J. Iles-Smith, A. H¨ otger, D. I. Miakota, M. K. Svendsen, C. Kastl, S. Canulescu, S. Xiao, M. Wubs, K. S. Thygesen, A. W. Holleitner, and N. Stenger, Combining experiments on luminescent cen- tres in hexagonal boron nitride with the polaron model and ab ...

    2023

  5. [13]

    Golami, K

    O. Golami, K. Sharman, R. Ghobadi, S. C. Wein, H. Zadeh-Haghighi, C. Gomes da Rocha, D. R. Salahub, and C. Simon, abinitio and group theoretical study of properties of a carbon trimer defect in hexagonal boron nitride, Phys. Rev. B 105, 184101 (2022)

    2022

  6. [14]

    Neumann, X

    M. Neumann, X. Wei, L. Morales-Inostroza, S. Song, S.- G. Lee, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, S. G¨ otzinger, and Y. H. Lee, Organic molecules as origin of visible-range single photon emission from hexagonal boron nitride and mica, ACS Nano 17, 11679 (2023)

    2023

  7. [15]

    Maciaszek and L

    M. Maciaszek and L. Razinkovas, Blue quantum emitter in hexagonal boron nitride and a carbon chain tetramer: a first-principles study, ACS Applied Nano Materials 7, 18979 (2024)

    2024

  8. [16]

    Kirchhoff, T

    A. Kirchhoff, T. Deilmann, P. Kr¨ uger, and M. Rohlfing, Electronic and optical properties of a hexagonal boron ni- tride monolayer in its pristine form and with point defects from first principles, Phys. Rev. B 106, 045118 (2022)

    2022

  9. [17]

    Cholsuk, S

    C. Cholsuk, S. Suwanna, and T. Vogl, Comprehensive scheme for identifying defects in solid-state quantum sys- tems, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 14, 6564 (2023)

    2023

  10. [18]

    R. J. P. Rom´ an, F. J. R. C. Costa, A. Zobelli, C. Elias, P. Valvin, G. Cassabois, B. Gil, A. Summerfield, T. S. Cheng, C. J. Mellor, P. H. Beton, S. V. Novikov, and L. F. Zagonel, Band gap measurements of monolayer h- BN and insights into carbon-related point defects, 2D Mat...

    2021

  11. [19]

    Cassabois, P

    G. Cassabois, P. Valvin, and B. Gil, Hexagonal boron ni- tride is an indirect bandgap semiconductor, Nature Pho- tonics 10, 262 (2016)

    2016

  12. [20]

    H. L. Stern, Q. Gu, J. Jarman, S. Eizagirre Barker, N. Mendelson, D. Chugh, S. Schott, H. H. Tan, H. Sir- ringhaus, I. Aharonovich, et al., Room-temperature op- tically detected magnetic resonance of single defects in hexagonal boron nitride, Nature communications 13, 1 (2022)

    2022

  13. [21]

    Gottscholl, M

    A. Gottscholl, M. Diez, V. Soltamov, C. Kasper, A. Sper- lich, M. Kianinia, C. Bradac, I. Aharonovich, and V. Dyakonov, Room temperature coherent control of spin defects in hexagonal boron nitride, Science Advances 7, 10.1126/sciadv.abf3630 (2021)

    2021 doi

  14. [22]

    S. Li, A. Pershin, G. Thiering, P. Udvarhelyi, and A. Gali, Ultraviolet quantum emitters in hexagonal boron nitride from carbon clusters, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 13, 3150 (2022)

    2022

  15. [23]

    Kianinia, S

    M. Kianinia, S. White, J. E. Fr¨ och, C. Bradac, and I. Aharonovich, Generation of spin defects in hexagonal boron nitride, ACS Photonics 7, 2147 (2020)

    2020

  16. [24]

    Ac ´ ın, I

    A. Ac ´ ın, I. Bloch, H. Buhrman, T. Calarco, C. Eichler, J. Eisert, D. Esteve, N. Gisin, S. J. Glaser, F. Jelezko, S. Kuhr, M. Lewenstein, M. F. Riedel, P. O. Schmidt, R. Thew, A. Wallraff, I. Walmsley, and F. K. Wilhelm, The quantum technologies roadmap: A european com- muni...

    2018

  17. [25]

    X. Gao, S. Pandey, M. Kianinia, J. Ahn, P. Ju, I. Aharonovich, N. Shivaram, and T. Li, Femtosecond laser writing of spin defects in hexagonal boron nitride, ACS Photonics 8, 994 (2021)

    2021

  18. [26]

    S. Moon, J. Kim, J. Park, S. Im, J. Kim, I. Hwang, and J. K. Kim, Hexagonal boron nitride for next- generation photonics and electronics, Advanced Materi- als 35, 2204161 (2023)

    2023

  19. [27]

    Auburger and A

    P. Auburger and A. Gali, Towards ab initio identification of paramagnetic substitutional carbon defects in hexag- onal boron nitride acting as quantum bits, Phys. Rev. B 104, 075410 (2021)

    2021

  20. [28]

    C ¸ akan, C

    A. C ¸ akan, C. Cholsuk, A. Gale, M. Kianinia, S. Pa¸ cal, S. Ate¸ s, I. Aharonovich, M. Toth, and T. Vogl, Quan- tum optics applications of hexagonal boron nitride de- fects (2024), arXiv:2410.07712 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Kianinia, Z.-Q

    M. Kianinia, Z.-Q. Xu, M. Toth, and I. Aharonovich, Quantum emitters in 2d materials: Emitter engineer- ing, photophysics, and integration in photonic nanostruc- tures, Applied Physics Reviews 9, 011306 (2022)

    2022

  22. [30]

    Esmann, S

    M. Esmann, S. C. Wein, and C. Ant´ on-Solanas, Solid- state single-photon sources: Recent advances for novel 11 quantum materials, Advanced Functional Materials 34, 2315936 (2024)

    2024

  23. [31]

    Cholsuk, A

    C. Cholsuk, A. C ¸ akan, S. Suwanna, and T. Vogl, Identifying electronic transitions of defects in hexagonal boron nitride for quantum memories, Advanced Optical Materials 12, 2302760 (2024), https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/adom.202302760

    2024 doi

  24. [32]

    Maciaszek, L

    M. Maciaszek, L. Razinkovas, and A. Alkauskas, Ther- modynamics of carbon point defects in hexagonal boron nitride, Phys. Rev. Materials 6, 014005 (2022)

    2022

  25. [33]

    Pinilla, N

    F. Pinilla, N. V´ asquez, I. Chac´ on, J. R. Maze, C. C´ ardenas, and F. Mu˜ noz, Spin-active single photon emitters in hexagonal boron nitride from carbon-based defects, Physica Scripta 98, 095505 (2023)

    2023

  26. [34]

    Guo, Y.-Z

    N.-J. Guo, Y.-Z. Yang, X.-D. Zeng, S. Yu, Y. Meng, Z.-P. Li, Z.-A. Wang, L.-K. Xie, J.-S. Xu, J.-F. Wang, et al., Coherent control of an ultrabright single spin in hexag- onal boron nitride at room temperature, arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.06191 (2021)

    2021 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Benedek, R

    Z. Benedek, R. Babar, ´A. Ganyecz, T. zilv´ asi,¨O. Legeza, G. Barcza, and V. Iv´ ady, Symmetric carbon tetramers forming spin qubits in hexagonal boron nitride, npj Com- putational Materials 9, 187 (2023)

    2023

  28. [36]

    C. Qian, V. Villafa˜ ne, M. Schalk, G. V. Astakhov, U. Kentsch, M. Helm, P. Soubelet, N. P. Wilson, R. Riz- zato, S. Mohr, A. W. Holleitner, D. B. Bucher, A. V. Stier, and J. J. Finley, Unveiling the zero-phonon line of the boron vacancy center by cavity-enhanced emission, Nan...

    2022

  29. [37]

    Liu, N.-J

    W. Liu, N.-J. Guo, S. Yu, Y. Meng, Z.-P. Li, Y.-Z. Yang, Z.-A. Wang, X.-D. Zeng, L.-K. Xie, Q. Li, J.-F. Wang, J.- S. Xu, Y.-T. Wang, J.-S. Tang, C.-F. Li, and G.-C. Guo, Spin-active defects in hexagonal boron nitride, Materials for Quantum Technology 2, 032002 (2022)

    2022

  30. [38]

    Huang, M

    P. Huang, M. Grzeszczyk, K. Vaklinova, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K. S. Novoselov, and M. Koperski, Carbon and vacancy centers in hexagonal boron nitride, Phys. Rev. B 106, 014107 (2022)

    2022

  31. [39]

    Gottscholl, M

    A. Gottscholl, M. Kianinia, V. Soltamov, S. Orlin- skii, G. Mamin, C. Bradac, C. Kasper, K. Krambrock, A. Sperlich, M. Toth, I. Aharonovich, and V. Dyakonov, Initialization and read-out of intrinsic spin defects in a van der waals crystal at room temperature, Nature Ma- terial...

    2020

  32. [40]

    C. Jara, T. Rauch, S. Botti, M. A. L. Marques, A. Noram- buena, R. Coto, J. E. Castellanos-´Aguila, J. R. Maze, and F. Munoz, First-principles identification of single photon emitters based on carbon clusters in hexagonal boron ni- tride, J. P. Chem. A 125, 1325 (2021)

    2021

  33. [41]

    Almohammad, Z

    M. Almohammad, Z. Alemoush, J. Li, J. Y. Lin, and H. X. Jiang, Carbon-related donor–acceptor pair transi- tion in the infrared in h-bn, Applied Physics Letters 124, 102106 (2024)

    2024

  34. [42]

    I. O. Robertson, B. Whitefield, S. C. Scholten, P. Singh, A. J. Healey, P. Reineck, M. Kianinia, D. A. Broad- way, I. Aharonovich, and J.-P. Tetienne, A universal mechanism for optically addressable solid-state spin pairs (2024), arXiv:2407.13148 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    2024

  35. [43]

    S. C. Scholten, P. Singh, A. J. Healey, I. O. Robertson, G. Haim, C. Tan, D. A. Broadway, L. Wang, H. Abe, T. Ohshima, M. Kianinia, P. Reineck, I. Aharonovich, and J.-P. Tetienne, Multi-species optically addressable spin defects in a van der waals material, Nature Commu- nicat...

    2024

  36. [44]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Hafner, Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals, Phys. Rev. B 47, 558(R) (1993)

    1993

  37. [45]

    Bhang, H

    J. Bhang, H. Ma, D. Yim, G. Galli, and H. Seo, First- principles predictions of out-of-plane group iv and v dimers as high-symmetry, high-spin defects in hexago- nal boron nitride, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 13, 45768 (2021)

    2021

  38. [46]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set, Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15 (1996)

    1996

  39. [47]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Hafner, Ab initio molecular-dynamics simulation of the liquid-metal–amorphous-semiconductor transition in germanium, Phys. Rev. B 49, 14251 (1994)

    1994

  40. [48]

    Amblard, G

    D. Amblard, G. D’Avino, I. Duchemin, and X. Blase, Universal polarization energies for defects in monolayer, surface, and bulk hexagonal boron nitride: A finite-size fragments gw approach, Phys. Rev. Mater. 6, 064008 (2022)

    2022

  41. [49]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996)

    1996

  42. [50]

    D. I. Badrtdinov, C. Rodriguez-Fernandez, M. Grzeszczyk, Z. Qiu, K. Vaklinova, P. Huang, A. Ham- pel, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Jiong, M. Potemski, C. E. Dreyer, M. Koperski, and M. R¨ osner, Dielectric environment sensitivity of carbon centers in hexagonal boron nitride, ...

    2023

  43. [51]

    Winter, M

    M. Winter, M. H. E. Bousquet, D. Jacquemin, I. Duchemin, and X. Blase, Photoluminescent properties of the carbon-dimer defect in hexagonal boron-nitride: A many-body finite-size cluster approach, Phys. Rev. Ma- terials 5, 095201 (2021)

    2021

  44. [52]

    S. M. Gilbert, T. Pham, M. Dogan, S. Oh, B. Shevitski, G. Schumm, S. Liu, P. Ercius, S. Aloni, M. L. Cohen, and A. Zettl, Alternative stacking sequences in hexagonal boron nitride, 2D Materials 6, 021006 (2019)

    2019

  45. [53]

    Pinilla, W

    F. Pinilla, W. A. Muriel, J. Cabezas-Escares, I. Chac´ on, C. C´ ardenas, and F. Mu˜ noz, Manipulating the stacking in two-dimensional hexagonal boron nitride bilayers: Im- plications for defect-based single photon emitters, ACS Applied Nano Materials 7, 6039 (2024)

    2024

  46. [54]

    L. Lang, P. Tavadze, A. Tellez, E. Bousquet, H. Xu, F. Mu˜ noz, N. Vasquez, U. Herath, and A. H. Romero, Expanding pyprocar for new features, maintainability, and reliability, Computer Physics Communications 297, 109063 (2024)

    2024

  47. [55]

    Herath, P

    U. Herath, P. Tavadze, X. He, E. Bousquet, S. Singh, F. Mu˜ noz, and A. H. Romero, Pyprocar: A python li- brary for electronic structure pre/post-processing, Com- put. Phys. Commun. 251, 107080 (2019)

    2019

  48. [56]

    J. Sun, A. Ruzsinszky, and J. P. Perdew, Strongly con- strained and appropriately normed semilocal density functional, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 036402 (2015)

    2015

  49. [57]

    Momma and F

    K. Momma and F. Izumi, Vesta 3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data, Journal of applied crystallography 44, 1272 (2011)

    2011

  50. [58]

    A. V. Krukau, O. A. Vydrov, A. F. Izmaylov, and G. E. Scuseria, Influence of the exchange screening parame- ter on the performance of screened hybrid functionals, J. Chem. Phys. 125, 224106 (2006)

    2006

  51. [59]

    Rauch, F

    T. Rauch, F. Munoz, M. A. L. Marques, and S. Botti, Defect levels from scan and mbj meta-gga exchange- correlation potentials, Phys. Rev. B 104, 064105 (2021)

    2021

  52. [60]

    Even worse, when using the PBE’s wavefunctions as seeds for more expensive calculations, the error is propagated

    failed to describe the ground state of the defects at large distances, providing a spurious triplet state. Even worse, when using the PBE’s wavefunctions as seeds for more expensive calculations, the error is propagated. To study the excited state of each configuration, the ∆S...

  53. [61]

    De´ ak, B

    P. De´ ak, B. Aradi, T. Frauenheim, E. Janz´ en, and A. Gali, Accurate defect levels obtained from the hse06 range-separated hybrid functional, Phys. Rev. B 81, 153203 (2010). 12

    2010

  54. [62]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  55. [63]

    Yang and P

    W. Yang and P. W. Ayers, Foundation for the ∆scf approach in density functional theory (2024), arXiv:2403.04604 [physics.chem-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Y. Jin, M. Govoni, G. Wolfowicz, S. E. Sullivan, F. J. Heremans, D. D. Awschalom, and G. Galli, Photolumi- nescence spectra of point defects in semiconductors: Val- idation of first-principles calculations, Phys. Rev. Mater. 5, 084603 (2021)

    2021

  57. [65]

    Iwanski, K

    J. Iwanski, K. P. Korona, M. Tokarczyk, G. Kowalski, A. K. Dabrowska, P. Tatarczak, I. Rogala, M. Bilska, M. Wojcik, S. Kret, A. Reszka, B. J. Kowalski, S. Li, A. Pershin, A. Gali, J. Binder, and A. Wysmolek, Re- vealing polytypism in 2d boron nitride with uv photolu- minescen...

    2024 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Reuter and M

    K. Reuter and M. Scheffler, Composition, structure, and stability ofruo2(110)as a function of oxygen pressure, Physical Review B 65, 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.035406 (2001)

    2001 doi

  59. [67]

    Tomaszkiewicz, The enthalpy of formation of hexago- nal boron nitride, Polish Journal of Chemistry V ol

    I. Tomaszkiewicz, The enthalpy of formation of hexago- nal boron nitride, Polish Journal of Chemistry V ol. 76 / nr 6, 891–899 (2002)

    2002

  60. [68]

    M. C. Jr., NIST-JANAF thermochemical tables, monograph 9, Vol. 9 (American Chemical Society, 1998) pp. 1–1951

    1998

  61. [69]

    Alkauskas, B

    A. Alkauskas, B. B. Buckley, D. D. Awschalom, and C. G. Van de Walle, First-principles theory of the luminescence lineshape for the triplet transition in diamond nv centres, New J. Phys. 16, 073026 (2014)

    2014

  62. [70]

    Babar, I

    R. Babar, I. A. Abrikosov, G. Barcza, and V. Iv´ ady, Carbon-contaminated topological defects in hbn: a po- tential new class of single photon emitters, arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.00755 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Santra, S

    P. Santra, S. Ghaderzadeh, M. Ghorbani-Asl, H.-P. Komsa, E. Besley, and A. V. Krasheninnikov, Strain- modulated defect engineering of two-dimensional materi- als, npj 2D Materials and Applications 8, 33 (2024)

    2024

  64. [72]

    J. P. Perdew, Density functional theory and the band gap problem, International Journal of Quantum Chemistry 28, 497 (1985)

    1985

  65. [73]

    J. R. Reimers, A. Sajid, R. Kobayashi, and M. J. Ford, Understanding and calibrating density-functional-theory calculations describing the energy and spectroscopy of defect sites in hexagonal boron nitride, Journal of Chem- ical Theory and Computation 14, 1602 (2018)

    2018

  66. [74]

    Kumar, C

    A. Kumar, C. Cholsuk, A. Zand, M. N. Mishuk, T. Matthes, F. Eilenberger, S. Suwanna, and T. Vogl, Lo- calized creation of yellow single photon emitting carbon complexes in hexagonal boron nitride, APL Materials11, 071108 (2023)

    2023

  67. [75]

    Y. Chen, C. Li, S. White, M. Nonahal, Z.-Q. Xu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, M. Toth, T. T. Tran, and I. Aharonovich, Generation of high-density quan- tum emitters in high-quality, exfoliated hexagonal boron nitride, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 13, 47283 (2021)

    2021

  68. [76]

    Yang, T.-X

    Y.-Z. Yang, T.-X. Zhu, Z.-P. Li, X.-D. Zeng, N.-J. Guo, S. Yu, Y. Meng, Z.-A. Wang, L.-K. Xie, Z.-Q. Zhou, Q. Li, J.-S. Xu, X.-Y. Gao, W. Liu, Y.-T. Wang, J.- S. Tang, C.-F. Li, and G.-C. Guo, Laser direct writing of visible spin defects in hexagonal boron nitride for ap- plic...

    2023

  69. [77]

    N.-J. Guo, S. Li, W. Liu, Y.-Z. Yang, X.-D. Zeng, S. Yu, Y. Meng, Z.-P. Li, Z.-A. Wang, L.-K. Xie, R.-C. Ge, J.-F. Wang, Q. Li, J.-S. Xu, Y.-T. Wang, J.-S. Tang, A. Gali, C.-F. Li, and G.-C. Guo, Coherent control of an ultra- bright single spin in hexagonal boron nitride at ro...

    2023

  70. [78]

    Chejanovsky, A

    N. Chejanovsky, A. Mukherjee, J. Geng, Y.-C. Chen, Y. Kim, A. Denisenko, A. Finkler, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, D. B. R. Dasari, et al., Single-spin reso- nance in a van der waals embedded paramagnetic defect, Nature materials 20, 1079 (2021)

    2021

  71. [79]

    Gottscholl, M

    A. Gottscholl, M. Diez, V. Soltamov, C. Kasper, D. Krauße, A. Sperlich, M. Kianinia, C. Bradac, I. Aharonovich, and V. Dyakonov, Spin defects in hbn as promising temperature, pressure and magnetic field quantum sensors, Nature Communications 12, 4480 (2021)

    2021

  72. [80]

    A. Gale, C. Li, Y. Chen, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, I. Aharonovich, and M. Toth, Site-specific fabrication of blue quantum emitters in hexagonal boron nitride, ACS Photonics 0, null (0)

  73. [81]

    Carbone, I

    A. Carbone, I. D. Breev, J. Figueiredo, S. Kretschmer, L. Geilen, A. B. Mhenni, J. Arceri, A. V. Krashenin- nikov, M. Wubs, A. W. Holleitner, A. Huck, C. Kastl, and N. Stenger, Quantifying the creation of negatively charged boron vacancies in he-ion irradiated hexagonal boron ...

    2025 arXiv

  74. [82]

    F. Ren, Z. Xu, and Y. Wu, Optimization of carbon irra- diation parameters for creating spin defects in hexagonal boron nitride, Nanotechnology and Precision Engineering 8, 033014 (2025), https://pubs.aip.org/tu/npe/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/10.0036119/20472607/033014 1 10.0036119.pdf

    2025 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.