Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 78 references

Topological junction states in graphene nanoribbons: A route to topological chemistry

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Topological junction states in graphene nanoribbons act as chemically reactive sites: NO2 binds more than twice as strongly there and doubles the transport current.

desk verdict The A60 Z2 classification is a useful new result, but the sensing claim needs a trivial control junction before it can carry the topological weight the paper puts on it. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.17949 v4 pith:O5YTNTS5 submitted 2024-12-23 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.chem-ph

Hazem Abdelsalam , Domenico Corona , Renebeth B. Payod , Mahmoud A. S. Sakr , Omar H. Abd-Elkader , Qinfang Zhang , Vasil A. Saroka This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.chem-ph
keywords graphenenanoribbonstopologicaljunctionstatesZ2invariantintercellularZakphaseNO2gassensingdensityfunctionaltheorytight-bindingmodelquantumtransport
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Topological junction states are localized electronic modes that appear where a topologically nontrivial graphene nanoribbon meets a trivial one. The paper proposes using these states for chemistry and sensing instead of only for quantum computing and spintronics. It classifies a family of zigzag-shaped A60 nanoribbons by the $Z_2$ invariant, builds a mirror-symmetric double junction with a topologically nontrivial A60(2,2,4,4) segment sandwiched between trivial AGNR(7) segments, and shows by density-functional calculations that NO$_2$ binds at the junction with adsorption energy $-0.66$ eV, more than double the $-0.27$ eV and $-0.30$ eV found on the surrounding ribbon sites. Transport simulations then show that this adsorption roughly doubles the current through the device. If correct, the work establishes topological junction states as chemically reactive sites and as the active element of a gas sensor read out by electrical current.

What carries the argument

The $Z_2$ topological invariant computed from the intercellular Zak phase of a tight-binding $\pi$-electron Hamiltonian. For the A60 family of zigzag-shaped nanoribbons, this invariant takes values 0 or 1 depending on the unit-cell parameters $\ell$ and $w$; when a ribbon with $Z_2 = 1$ is joined to one with $Z_2 = 0$, bulk-boundary correspondence guarantees a localized topological junction state at the interface. The device geometry is a mirror-symmetric double junction whose dangling-bond carbon atoms are converted to methyl groups, leaving one junction state per junction, and transport through it is modeled in the low-bias regime with non-equilibrium Green's functions.

What would settle it

Recompute the $Z_2$ invariant for the periodic ribbon whose unit cell carries the methyl termination, or solve the tight-binding model of the terminated double junction directly: if no state remains pinned near zero energy at each junction, the enhanced NO$_2$ binding and doubled current cannot be attributed to a topologically protected state. A complementary experiment is scanning tunneling spectroscopy of a methyl-terminated A60-AGNR junction, where a zero-bias conductance peak at the junction would support the claim and its absence would refute it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that localized topological junction states are chemically distinct: a NO$_2$ molecule binds preferentially and more strongly at the junction between a topologically nontrivial A60(2,2,4,4) nanoribbon and a trivial AGNR(7) nanoribbon. In the methyl-terminated double-junction device, the two junction states split symmetrically around the Fermi level and appear as the HOMO and LUMO; adsorption of NO$_2$ at the junction transfers roughly half an electron out of the ribbon, induces spin splitting that reduces the minority-spin gap, and results in a twofold increase in the modeled transport current. The paper reads these results as evidence that topological junction states can be exploited for sensing and junction-assisted chemistry, adding a chemical application to the quantum-computing and spintronics roles usually discussed for such states.

Load-bearing premise

The sensing and transport results assume that the topological junction state survives after the device's dangling carbon bonds are converted to methyl groups, even though the $Z_2$ classification is computed for pristine periodic ribbons and the terminated device is only assumed, not proved, to retain one junction state per junction.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • NO$_2$ adsorption at the topological junction is more than twice as strong as at nearby non-junction sites ($-0.66$ eV versus $-0.27$ eV and $-0.30$ eV), making the junction the reactive hot spot of the device.
  • Transport through the double junction is site-selective: NO$_2$ at the junction doubles the current, while adsorption on the AGNR or A60 segments blocks it, giving an electrical readout that distinguishes where the molecule binds.
  • The estimated room-temperature recovery time at the junction site is about 0.15 s, more than an order of magnitude faster than a recent experimental NO$_2$ sensor based on indium oxide nanoparticles, so the device could support rapid measurement cycles.
  • The $Z_2$ classification table for the A60 family is predictive: other parameter combinations with $Z_2 = 1$ should also host junction states when paired with trivial ribbons, extending the same sensing design.
  • Because the junction states are nucleophilic and radical-like, the same design principle applies to catalysis and to junction-assisted chemistry beyond gas detection.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension not developed in the paper is to treat the methyl termination itself as part of the topological design: recomputing the $Z_2$ invariant for the terminated unit cell would show whether the sensing state is truly protected or merely a robust edge state of the finite cluster.
  • The same termination-and-juxtapose recipe could transfer to other one-dimensional topological platforms, such as germanene nanoribbons or engineered photonic and acoustic lattices, whose localized interface states might be turned into sensing or reaction sites.
  • Systematically varying the A60 parameters $\ell$ and $w$ across the classification table could tune the energy and spatial extent of the junction states, and therefore tune adsorption energy and selectivity; the paper does not compute this design map.
  • The predicted twofold current increase assumes a well-matched, low-bias lead–device interface; including self-consistent transport would test whether the junction-induced current change survives realistic lead scattering, and how the sensor's sensitivity compares with the site-selective blocking seen at non-junction sites.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a tight-binding classification of the Z2 invariant for a class of chevron-type graphene nanoribbons (A60), constructs finite junctions between topological and trivial unit cells, and verifies localized topological junction states in finite clusters. It then models a methyl-terminated mirror-symmetric double junction, computes DFT adsorption energies of NO2 at three sites, and simulates coherent transport through the device with NEGF. The central claim is that the topological junction state enhances NO2 adsorption (E_a = -0.66 eV vs -0.27 and -0.30 eV at non-junction sites) and causes a two-fold increase in the transport current, thereby proposing topological junction states as a basis for gas sensing and junction-assisted chemistry.

Significance. If the central attribution is correct, the paper opens a genuinely new application direction for topological junction states in graphene nanoribbons, moving beyond quantum computing and spintronics into chemical sensing and reactivity. The systematic Z2 classification of the A60 family in Table 2 is a useful contribution in itself, and the paper is commendably explicit about its computational procedures and provides raw data and code for reproduction. The DFT and transport results are plausible as reported, but the connection between the topological invariant and the adsorption/transport enhancement is not yet established with the necessary controls, so the significance of the 'topological chemistry' claim is currently prospective rather than demonstrated.

major comments (3)
  1. [Topological sensing (Fig. 2, Fig. 3(a))] The Z2 invariant is computed only for the pristine periodic A60(2,2,4,4) and AGNR(7) unit cells, while all DFT and transport calculations are performed on the methyl-terminated finite double junction of Fig. 2. The statement 'we expect one TJS per junction similar to Figure 1d' (Topological sensing) is an assumption, not a verification: methyl termination removes atoms from the pi-network, finite size can shift states, and the close proximity of the two junctions can split or annihilate the topological modes. Please demonstrate that the in-gap states in the terminated device are indeed TJSs, for example by recomputing the invariant for the terminated unit cell or by continuously tracking the states under a termination parameter, and by checking that their number and location follow bulk-boundary correspondence. Without this step, the HOMO/LUMO localization in Fig. 3(a) could equally be interpreted as ordinary confined states of the A60 fragment.
  2. [Topological sensing (adsorption energies, Fig. 2)] The paper compares adsorption at the junction with adsorption on the plain AGNR(7) and A60(2,2,4,4) segments, but these are chemically and structurally different environments. To support the 'topological chemistry' attribution, please add a geometrically matched control junction with Z2=0 on both sides and the same local bonding and termination, and compare adsorption energy and charge transfer at the corresponding site. If the trivial control gives a comparable -0.6 eV adsorption, the conclusion that the topological character boosts reactivity would not be supported. This control is load-bearing for the paper's central claim.
  3. [Sensor read-out (Fig. 4, text near 'non-self-consistent transport modeling')] The transport modeling is justified as non-self-consistent by assuming 'negligible relaxation and charge transfer' (citing Ref. 68), but the adsorption event itself transfers -0.55 e Mulliken charge to NO2. Please show that a self-consistent NEGF calculation (or at least a charging-potential correction) preserves the two-fold current increase, and provide transmission spectra at representative biases to identify the resonant mechanism behind the increase. Without this, the sensor readout claim rests on an approximation whose validity is questionable exactly in the regime of interest.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 3 caption and text below Fig. 4] There are typos: 'adsoption' should be 'adsorption' in the Fig. 3 caption, and 'N-dopped' should be 'N-doped' in the text below Fig. 4.
  2. [Table 2] The header note says 'Ligthgray' instead of 'Light gray'; the footnotes a-d would be clearer as conventional table footnotes rather than as inline parenthetical markers.
  3. [References and Supplementary Information] The two deposit identifiers for the supporting material (zenodo.15209274 in Ref. 52 and zenodo.15672059 in the Supporting Information section) should be reconciled so that readers access a single, current dataset.
  4. [Charge-transfer reporting (Topological sensing)] The notation '−0.43eHirshfeld charge' lacks a separator; use '−0.43 e (Hirshfeld)' for consistency with the Mulliken values.
  5. [Spin-resolved gaps (Topological sensing)] In the sentence reporting Eg,↓=0.51 eV, Eg,↑=1.04 eV, and Eg=1.08 eV, clarify whether Eg,↑ is computed with spin polarization and whether the spin-unpolarized gap is reported for the same relaxed geometry; the slight difference between Eg,↑ and Eg is otherwise difficult to interpret.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity; the topological classification, adsorption, and transport steps are independently computed, with only an unverified but non-circular assumption about TJS survival in the terminated double junction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The Z2 classification is computed from a single-orbital nearest-neighbor tight-binding Hamiltonian (Eq. 1) with t1 = 3.12 eV taken from Ref. 48, using the intercellular Zak phase (Eq. 2); no parameter is fitted to the adsorption or transport results. Finite-size junction states in Fig. 1 are direct TB eigenstates of the same Hamiltonian, not manufactured from the DFT results. The sensing claims rest on independent DFT (Gaussian 16) adsorption energies and partial densities of states and on NEGF transport (NanoDCAL); E_a = -0.66 eV at the junction versus -0.27 and -0.30 eV at the other sites are computed outputs, not defined quantities. The only assumption bridging topology to the device is the statement 'we expect one TJS per junction similar to Figure 1d' in the 'Topological sensing' section: the Z2 invariant is not recomputed for the methyl-terminated double junction. That is a missing verification and a possible correctness risk, but it is not a circular reduction, because the DFT localization and transport response are independently calculated rather than constructed from the assumption. Self-citations to the authors' earlier A60 work (Refs. 34, 38-41) supply nomenclature and structural context, while the topological classification is recomputed here; no load-bearing step reduces to a self-citation. No equation is defined in terms of the quantity it is used to predict, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. Hence no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the standard bulk-boundary correspondence, a minimal tight-binding Hamiltonian, the transferability of a literature attempt frequency, and the assumption that chemical termination preserves the topology. These are reasonable but some are unverified, particularly the preservation of the TJS in the terminated double junction.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math Bulk-boundary correspondence between the Z2 invariant and localized junction states.
    Used throughout to predict and interpret TJS from the Z2 classification (introduction and Section 'Topological properties').
  • domain assumption The nearest-neighbor tight-binding model with t1=3.12 eV is sufficient to determine the topology of A60 GNRs.
    Hamiltonian in Eq. (1); the Z2 classification in Table 2 is derived from it without explicit justification that higher-order hoppings or edge modifications do not change the invariant.
  • domain assumption The methyl-terminated, finite-size double junction preserves the infinite periodic structure's topology.
    Explicit expectation stated in Section 'Topological sensing'; not verified by recomputing the invariant for the terminated unit cell.
  • domain assumption A literature attempt frequency (10^12 s^-1 from CNT-based NO2 sensors) applies to this GNR junction system.
    Used in Eq. (3) to estimate recovery time; transferability to the GNR junction is assumed.
  • domain assumption The DFT functional and basis set (detailed in the Supplementary Information) provide reliable adsorption energies and charge transfers.
    All adsorption and spin-splitting results rely on DFT as implemented in Gaussian 16; the specific functional and basis set are not given in the main text.
  • domain assumption Non-self-consistent NEGF transport modeling is adequate at low bias for this system.
    The authors state this is sufficient, citing Ref. 68.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Topological junction states in graphene nanoribbons: A route to topological chemistry." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/O5YTNTS5

@misc{pith2026241217949,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Topological junction states in graphene nanoribbons: A route to topological chemistry},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/O5YTNTS5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.17949}
}
abstract

Two-dimensional topological insulators with propagating topological edge states are promising for dissipationless transport, while their one-dimensional analogs are capable of hosting localized topological junction states that are mainly envisaged for quantum computing and spintronics. Here, in contrast, we propose to use the localized nature of topological junction states for sensing applications. We report a systematic topological classification of a wide class of graphene nanoribbons represented by already synthesized extended chevron species. Using this classification, we theoretically model a double junction transport that shows an enhanced interaction with the NO$_2$ molecule. Our results show that topological junction states of nanoribbons can open an avenue for topological sensing and junction-assisted chemistry applications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.17949 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Electronic properties of topological junctions. (a) Energy levels for cGNR [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Double junction scheme. Following notation used in Table 1, the light green unit [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Interaction with NO2 gas molecule. (a) The electronic energy levels of pristine DJ together with molecular orbitals of TJS and extended bulk states. Isovalue: 0.02. Similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Quantum transport readout of gas molecules. (a) The scheme of the quantum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Z.; Kane, C

    Hasan, M. Z.; Kane, C. L. C olloquium: T opological insulators. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2010, 82, 3045--3067

    work page 2010

  2. [2]

    T opological phases in two-dimensional materials: a review

    Ren, Y.; Qiao, Z.; Niu, Q. T opological phases in two-dimensional materials: a review. Rep. Prog. Phys 2016, 79, 066501

    work page 2016

  3. [3]

    Cayssol, J.; Fuchs, J. N. T opological and geometrical aspects of band theory. J. Phys. Mater. 2021, 4, 034007

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    Weber, B. et al. 2024 R oadmap on 2D Topological Insulators. J. Phys. Mater. 2024, 7, 022501

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    L.; Zhang, S.-C

    Qi, X.-L. L.; Zhang, S.-C. C. T opological insulators and superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2011, 83, 1057--1110

    work page 2011

  6. [6]

    Topological insulator materials

    Ando, Y. Topological insulator materials. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 2013, 82, 102001

    work page 2013

  7. [7]

    D irac materials

    Wehling, T.; Black-Schaffer, A.; Balatsky, A. D irac materials. Adv. Phys. 2014, 63, 1--76

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    L.; Mele, E

    Kane, C. L.; Mele, E. J. Q uantum spin H all effect in graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 95, 226801

    work page 2005

Show all 78 references
  1. [9]

    L.; Mele, E

    Kane, C. L.; Mele, E. J. Z _2 topological order and the quantum spin H all effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 95, 146802

    2005

  2. [10]

    Cao, T.; Zhao, F.; Louie, S. G. T opological phases in graphene nanoribbons: J unction States, spin centers, and quantum spin shains. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017, 119, 076401

    2017

  3. [11]

    Lee, Y.-l.; Zhao, F.; Cao, T.; Ihm, J.; Louie, S. G. T opological phases in cove-edged and chevron graphene nanoribbons: G eometric structures, Z_2 invariants, and junction states. Nano Lett. 2018, 18, 7247--7253

    2018

  4. [12]

    T opological properties of gapped graphene nanoribbons with spatial symmetries

    Lin, K.-S.; Chou, M.-Y. T opological properties of gapped graphene nanoribbons with spatial symmetries. Nano Lett. 2018, 18, 7254--7260

    2018

  5. [13]

    A.; Lado, J

    Ortiz, R.; García-Martínez, N. A.; Lado, J. L.; Fernández-Rossier, J. E lectrical spin manipulation in graphene nanostructures. Phys. Rev. B 2018, 97, 195425

    2018

  6. [14]

    J.; Veber, G.; Cao, T.; Bronner, C.; Chen, T.; Zhao, F.; Rodriguez, H.; Louie, S

    Rizzo, D. J.; Veber, G.; Cao, T.; Bronner, C.; Chen, T.; Zhao, F.; Rodriguez, H.; Louie, S. G.; Crommie, M. F.; Fischer, F. R. T opological band engineering of graphene nanoribbons. Nature 2018, 560, 204--208

    2018

  7. [15]

    A.; Borin Barin, G.; Daniels, C.; Cupo, A.; Meunier, V.; Feng, X.; Narita, A.; Müllen, K.; Ruffieux, P.; Fasel, R

    Gr \"o ning, O.; Wang, S.; Yao, X.; Pignedoli, C. A.; Borin Barin, G.; Daniels, C.; Cupo, A.; Meunier, V.; Feng, X.; Narita, A.; Müllen, K.; Ruffieux, P.; Fasel, R. E ngineering of robust topological quantum phases in graphene nanoribbons. Nature 2018, 560, 209--213

    2018

  8. [16]

    P.; Jauho, A

    Joost, J. P.; Jauho, A. P.; Bonitz, M. C orrelated topological states in graphene nanoribbon heterostructures. Nano Lett. 2019, 19, 9045--9050

    2019

  9. [17]

    Jiang, J.; Louie, S. G. Topology classification using chiral symmetry and spin correlations in graphene nanoribbons. Nano Lett. 2021, 21, 197--202

    2021

  10. [18]

    M.; Liu, T.-J.; Kuc, A.; Heine, T

    Arnold, F. M.; Liu, T.-J.; Kuc, A.; Heine, T. S tructure-imposed electronic topology in cove-edged graphene nanoribbons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2022, 129, 216401

    2022

  11. [19]

    Kuo, D. M. T. E ffects of coulomb blockade on the charge transport through the topological states of finite armchair graphene nanoribbons and heterostructures. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 1757

    2023

  12. [20]

    Perkins, D. T. S.; Ferreira, A. U ltrafast all-electrical universal nanoqubits. Phys. Rev. B 2024, 109, L041411

    2024

  13. [21]

    T opologically localized vibronic excitations in second-layer graphene nanoribbons

    Wang, Z.; Yin, R.; Tang, Z.; Du, H.; Liang, Y.; Wang, X.; Deng, Q.-S.; Tan, Y.-Z.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, C.; Tan, S.; Wang, B. T opologically localized vibronic excitations in second-layer graphene nanoribbons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2024, 133, 036401

    2024

  14. [22]

    Zhao, C.; Catarina, G.; Zhang, J.-J.; Henriques, J. a. C. G.; Yang, L.; Ma, J.; Feng, X.; Gröning, O.; Ruffieux, P.; Fern\'andez-Rossier, J.; Fasel, R. T unable topological phases in nanographene-based spin-1/2 alternating-exchange H eisenberg chains. Nat. Nanotech. 2024, 19, ...

    2024

  15. [23]

    A quest for structurally uniform graphene nanoribbons: S ynthesis, properties, and applications

    Yano, Y.; Mitoma, N.; Ito, H.; Itami, K. A quest for structurally uniform graphene nanoribbons: S ynthesis, properties, and applications. J. Org. Chem. 2020, 85, 4--33

    2020

  16. [24]

    G raphene nanoribbons: On -Surface synthesis and integration into electronic devices

    Chen, Z.; Narita, A.; M \"u llen, K. G raphene nanoribbons: On -Surface synthesis and integration into electronic devices. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 2001893

    2020

  17. [25]

    H olonomy, the quantum adiabatic theorem, and B erry's phase

    Simon, B. H olonomy, the quantum adiabatic theorem, and B erry's phase. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1983, 51, 2167--2170

    1983

  18. [26]

    J.; Wu, Y.-S

    Niu, Q.; Thouless, D. J.; Wu, Y.-S. Q uantized H all conductance as a topological invariant. Phys. Rev. B 1985, 31, 3372--3377

    1985

  19. [27]

    parity anomaly

    Haldane, F. D. M. Model for a quantum H all effect without landau levels: Condensed-matter realization of the "parity anomaly". Phys. Rev. Lett. 1988, 61, 2015--2018

    1988

  20. [28]

    A.; Feng, X.; M \"u llen, K.; Fasel, R.; Ruffieux, P

    Wang, S.; Talirz, L.; Pignedoli, C. A.; Feng, X.; M \"u llen, K.; Fasel, R.; Ruffieux, P. G iant edge state splitting at atomically precise graphene zigzag edges. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11507

    2016

  21. [29]

    Gao, N.; Gao, T.; Yang, X.; Dai, X.; Zhou, W.; Zhang, A.; Lieber, C. M. S pecific detection of biomolecules in physiological solutions using graphene transistor biosensors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2016, 113, 14633--14638

    2016

  22. [30]

    I.; Chen, P.; Chu, W

    Adamu, B. I.; Chen, P.; Chu, W. Role of nanostructuring of sensing materials in performance of electrical gas sensors by combining with extra strategies. Nano Ex. 2021, 2, 042003

    2021

  23. [31]

    P.; Sabu, C.; Swamy, N

    Johnson, A. P.; Sabu, C.; Swamy, N. K.; Anto, A.; Gangadharappa, H.; Pramod, K. G raphene nanoribbon: An emerging and efficient flat molecular platform for advanced biosensing. Biosens. Bioelectron 2021, 184, 113245

    2021

  24. [32]

    A.; Younis, W

    Abdelsalam, H.; Saroka, V. A.; Younis, W. O. E dge functionalization of finite graphene nanoribbon superlattices. Superlattices Microstruct. 2019, 129, 54--61

    2019

  25. [33]

    C er n evi c s, K.; Pizzochero, M.; Yazyev, O. V. E ven–odd conductance effect in graphene nanoribbons induced by edge functionalization with aromatic molecules: B asis for novel chemosensors. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 2020, 135, 681

    2020

  26. [34]

    E lectronic and adsorption properties of extended chevron and cove-edged graphene nanoribbons

    Abdelsalam, H.; Saroka, V.; Teleb, N.; Ali, M.; Osman, W.; Zhang, Q. E lectronic and adsorption properties of extended chevron and cove-edged graphene nanoribbons. Physica E Low Dimens. 2021, 126, 114438

    2021

  27. [35]

    A.; Abdelsalam, H.; Teleb, N

    Sakr, M. A.; Abdelsalam, H.; Teleb, N. H.; Abd-Elkader, O. H.; Saroka, V. A.; Zhang, Q. I nvestigating adsorption characteristics and electronic properties of C lar’s goblet and beyond. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2024, 849, 141428

    2024

  28. [36]

    A.; Shekhirev, M.; Aluru, N

    Mehdi Pour, M.; Lashkov, A.; Radocea, A.; Liu, X.; Sun, T.; Lipatov, A.; Korlacki, R. A.; Shekhirev, M.; Aluru, N. R.; Lyding, J. W.; Sysoev, V.; Sinitskii, A. L aterally extended atomically precise graphene nanoribbons with improved electrical conductivity for efficient gas s...

    2017

  29. [37]

    M.; Cho, S.-Y.; Chong, S.; Koh, H.-J.; Kim, D

    Cho, K. M.; Cho, S.-Y.; Chong, S.; Koh, H.-J.; Kim, D. W.; Kim, J.; Jung, H.-T. E dge-functionalized graphene nanoribbon chemical sensor: C omparison with carbon nanotube and graphene. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 42905--42914

    2018

  30. [38]

    A.; Batrakov, K

    Saroka, V. A.; Batrakov, K. G.; Chernozatonskii, L. A. E dge-modified zigzag-shaped graphene nanoribbons: Structure and electronic properties. Phys. Solid State 2014, 56, 2135--2145

    2014

  31. [39]

    A.; Batrakov, K

    Saroka, V. A.; Batrakov, K. G.; Demin, V. A.; Chernozatonskii, L. A. B and gaps in jagged and straight graphene nanoribbons tunable by an external electric field. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2015, 27, 145305

    2015

  32. [40]

    A.; Batrakov, K

    Saroka, V. A.; Batrakov, K. G. In Physics, Chemistry and Applications of Nanostructures; Borisenko, V. E., Gaponenko, S. V., Gurin, V. S., Kam, C. H., Eds.; World Scientific: Singapore, 2015; pp 240--243

    2015

  33. [41]

    A.; Batrakov, K

    Saroka, V. A.; Batrakov, K. G. Z igzag-shaped Superlattices on the basis of graphene nanoribbons: S tructure and electronic properties. Russ. Phys. J. 2016, 59, 633--639

    2016

  34. [42]

    N.; Car, R.; Resta, R

    Kudin, K. N.; Car, R.; Resta, R. B erry phase approach to longitudinal dipole moments of infinite chains in electronic-structure methods with local basis sets. J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 126, 234101

    2007

  35. [43]

    Rhim, J.-W.; Behrends, J.; Bardarson, J. H. B ulk-boundary correspondence from the intercellular Z ak phase. Phys. Rev. B 2017, 95, 035421

    2017

  36. [44]

    A.; Sun, W

    Last, J. A.; Sun, W. M.; Witschi, H. Ozone, NO , and NO _2 : oxidant air pollutants and more. Environ. Health Perspect. 1994, 102, 179--184

    1994

  37. [45]

    Long-term exposure to NO _2 and O _3 and all-cause and respiratory mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Huangfu, P.; Atkinson, R. Long-term exposure to NO _2 and O _3 and all-cause and respiratory mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ. Int. 2020, 144, 105998

    2020

  38. [46]

    Metal oxide gas sensors for detecting NO _2 in industrial exhaust gas: Recent developments

    Li, Q.; Zeng, W.; Li, Y. Metal oxide gas sensors for detecting NO _2 in industrial exhaust gas: Recent developments. Sens. Actuators B: Chem. 2022, 359, 131579

    2022

  39. [47]

    J.; Bosnjak, B.; Tiemann, L.; Blick, R

    Sichau, J.; Prada, M.; Anlauf, T.; Lyon, T. J.; Bosnjak, B.; Tiemann, L.; Blick, R. H. R esonance microwave measurements of an intrinsic spin-orbit coupling gap in graphene: A possible indication of a topological state. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019, 122, 046403

    2019

  40. [48]

    Partoens, B.; Peeters, F. M. F rom graphene to graphite: Electronic structure around the K point. Phys. Rev. B 2006, 74, 075404

    2006

  41. [49]

    A.; Abdelsalam, H.; Demin, V

    Saroka, V. A.; Abdelsalam, H.; Demin, V. A.; Grassano, D.; Kuten, S. A.; Pushkarchuk, A.; Pulci, O. A bsorption in finite-length chevron-type graphene nanoribbons. Semiconductors 2018, 52, 1890--1893

    2018

  42. [50]

    B.; Grassano, D.; Santos, G

    Payod, R. B.; Grassano, D.; Santos, G. N. C.; Levshov, D. I.; Pulci, O.; Saroka, V. A. 2N+4 -rule and an atlas of bulk optical resonances of zigzag graphene nanoribbons. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 82

    2020

  43. [51]

    Saroka, V. A. TB pack (version 0.5.2 and higher). 2025; https://github.com/vasilsaroka/TBpack, Accessed: 2025-04-25

    2025

  44. [52]

    See Supplementary Materials at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15209274 that include TB and DFT calculation raw data and Mathematica code to reproduce the reported results

    doi

  45. [53]

    V.; Lischner, J.; Kaxiras, E.; Mostofi, A

    Tepliakov, N. V.; Lischner, J.; Kaxiras, E.; Mostofi, A. A.; Pizzochero, M. U nveiling and manipulating hidden symmetries in graphene nanoribbons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2023, 130, 9045--9050

    2023

  46. [54]

    P.; Saleh, M.; Feng, X.; Müllen, K.; Fasel, R

    Cai, J.; Ruffieux, P.; Jaafar, R.; Bieri, M.; Braun, T.; Blankenburg, S.; Muoth, M.; Seitsonen, A. P.; Saleh, M.; Feng, X.; Müllen, K.; Fasel, R. A tomically precise bottom-up fabrication of graphene nanoribbons. Nature 2010, 466, 470--473

    2010

  47. [55]

    L.; Louie, S

    Son, Y.-W.; Cohen, M. L.; Louie, S. G. E nergy gaps in graphene nanoribbons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 97, 216803

    2006

  48. [56]

    Frisch, M. J. et al. Gaussian 16 R evision C .01. 2016; Gaussian Inc. Wallingford CT

    2016

  49. [57]

    M ultiwfn: A multifunctional wavefunction analyzer

    Lu, T.; Chen, F. M ultiwfn: A multifunctional wavefunction analyzer. J. Comput. Chem. 2012, 33, 580--592

    2012

  50. [58]

    P.; Saroka, V

    Collier, T. P.; Saroka, V. A.; Portnoi, M. E. T uning terahertz transitions in a double-gated quantum ring. Phys. Rev. B 2017, 96, 235430

    2017

  51. [59]

    J.; Sakaguchi, H.; Louie, S

    Song, S.; Teng, Y.; Tang, W.; Xu, Z.; He, Y.; Ruan, J.; Kojima, T.; Hu, W.; Giessibl, F. J.; Sakaguchi, H.; Louie, S. G.; Lu, J. J anus graphene nanoribbons with localized states on a single zigzag edge. Nature 2025, 637, 580--586

    2025

  52. [60]

    A.; Talirz, L.; Ruffieux, P.; Söde, H.; Liang, L.; Meunier, V.; Berger, R.; Li, R.; Feng, X.; M \"u llen, K.; Fasel, R

    Cai, J.; Pignedoli, C. A.; Talirz, L.; Ruffieux, P.; Söde, H.; Liang, L.; Meunier, V.; Berger, R.; Li, R.; Feng, X.; M \"u llen, K.; Fasel, R. G raphene nanoribbon heterojunctions. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014, 9, 896--900

    2014

  53. [61]

    Friedrich, N.; Brandimarte, P.; Li, J.; Saito, S.; Yamaguchi, S.; Pozo, I.; Pe \ n a, D.; Frederiksen, T.; Garcia-Lekue, A.; S \'a nchez-Portal, D.; Pascual, J. I. M agnetism of topological boundary states induced by boron substitution in graphene nanoribbons. Phys. Rev. Lett....

    2020

  54. [62]

    E.; Zhao, F.; Brooks, E.; Zhu, J.; Piskun, I.; Wang, S.; Delgado, A.; Lee, Y.-L.; Louie, S

    Blackwell, R. E.; Zhao, F.; Brooks, E.; Zhu, J.; Piskun, I.; Wang, S.; Delgado, A.; Lee, Y.-L.; Louie, S. G.; Fischer, F. R. Spin splitting of dopant edge state in magnetic zigzag graphene nanoribbons. Nature 2021, 600, 647--652

    2021

  55. [63]

    Wen, E. C. H.; Jacobse, P. H.; Jiang, J.; Wang, Z.; Louie, S. G.; Crommie, M. F.; Fischer, F. R. F ermi-Level engineering of nitrogen core-doped armchair graphene nanoribbons. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 19338--19346

    2023

  56. [64]

    H.; Pizzochero, M.; Wen, E

    Jacobse, P. H.; Pizzochero, M.; Wen, E. C. H.; Barin, G. B.; Li, X.; Mutlu, Z.; Müllen, K.; Kaxiras, E.; Crommie, M. F.; Fischer, F. R. C oupling of nondegenerate topological modes in nitrogen core-doped graphene nanoribbons. ACS Nano 2025, 19, 13029--13036

    2025

  57. [65]

    Chen, L. et al. O riented graphene nanoribbons embedded in hexagonal boron nitride trenches. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 14703

    2017

  58. [66]

    Ab initio modeling of quantum transport properties of molecular electronic devices

    Taylor, J.; Guo, H.; Wang, J. Ab initio modeling of quantum transport properties of molecular electronic devices. Phys. Rev. B 2001, 63, 245407

    2001

  59. [67]

    Ab initio modeling of open systems: Charge transfer, electron conduction, and molecular switching of a C _ 60 device

    Taylor, J.; Guo, H.; Wang, J. Ab initio modeling of open systems: Charge transfer, electron conduction, and molecular switching of a C _ 60 device. Phys. Rev. B 2001, 63, 121104

    2001

  60. [68]

    U.; Yang, W

    Ke, S.-H.; Baranger, H. U.; Yang, W. E lectron transport through molecules: S elf-consistent and non-self-consistent approaches. Phys. Rev. B 2004, 70, 085410

    2004

  61. [69]

    An ultra-sensitive gas nanosensor based on asymmetric dual-gate graphene nanoribbon field-effect transistor: proposal and investigation

    Tamersit, K. An ultra-sensitive gas nanosensor based on asymmetric dual-gate graphene nanoribbon field-effect transistor: proposal and investigation. J. Comput. Electron. 2019, 18, 846--855

    2019

  62. [70]

    U ber die dissociationsw \

    Arrhenius, S. \"U ber die dissociationsw \"a rme und den einfluss der temperatur auf den dissociationsgrad der elektrolyte. Z. Phys. Chem. 1889, 4U, 96--116

  63. [71]

    M.; Gaur, N

    Parey, V.; Abraham, B. M.; Gaur, N. K.; Thapa, R. F irst-principles study of two-dimensional B-doped carbon nanostructures for toxic phosgene gas detection. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2022, 5, 12737--12745

    2022

  64. [72]

    Ab initio study of CNT NO _2 gas sensor

    Peng, S.; Cho, K.; Qi, P.; Dai, H. Ab initio study of CNT NO _2 gas sensor. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2004, 387, 271--276

    2004

  65. [73]

    Fast responding and recovering of NO _2 sensors based on Ni-doped In _2 O _3 nanoparticles

    Jin, Z.; Wang, C.; Wu, L.; Song, H.; Yao, X.; Liu, J.; Zhao, J.; Zeng, Z.; Wang, F. Fast responding and recovering of NO _2 sensors based on Ni-doped In _2 O _3 nanoparticles. Sens. Actuators B: Chem. 2023, 377, 133058

    2023

  66. [74]

    J.; Eek, L.; Rudenko, A

    Klaassen, D. J.; Eek, L.; Rudenko, A. N.; van’t Westende, E. D.; Castenmiller, C.; Zhang, Z.; De Boeij, P. L.; Van Houselt, A.; Ezawa, M.; Zandvliet, H. J. W.; Morais Smith, C.; Bampoulis, P. R ealization of a one-dimensional topological insulator in ultrathin germanene nanori...

    2025

  67. [75]

    C.; Song, D.; Heinrich, M.; Zeuner, J

    Plotnik, Y.; Rechtsman, M. C.; Song, D.; Heinrich, M.; Zeuner, J. M.; Nolte, S.; Lumer, Y.; Malkova, N.; Xu, J.; Szameit, A.; Chen, Z.; Segev, M. Observation of unconventional edge states in ‘photonic graphene'. Nat. Mater. 2014, 13, 57--62

    2014

  68. [76]

    R.; Larsen, T.; Villanueva, L

    Serra-Garcia, M.; Peri, V.; S \"u sstrunk, R.; Bilal, O. R.; Larsen, T.; Villanueva, L. G.; Huber, S. D. O bservation of a phononic quadrupole topological insulator. Nature 2018, 555, 342--345

    2018

  69. [77]

    Peri, V.; Serra-Garcia, M.; Ilan, R.; Huber, S. D. A xial-field-induced chiral channels in an acoustic Weyl system. Nat. Phys. 2019, 15, 357--361

    2019

  70. [78]

    P hotonic realization of a generic type of graphene edge states exhibiting topological flat band

    Xia, S.; Liang, Y.; Tang, L.; Song, D.; Xu, J.; Chen, Z. P hotonic realization of a generic type of graphene edge states exhibiting topological flat band. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2023, 131, 013804 mcitethebibliography manuscript_arXiv_proof.tex0000664000000000000000000012422715023745...

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.