Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Streamlined Krylov construction and classification of ergodic Floquet systems

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Any periodically driven (Floquet) quantum evolution can be mapped to a five-diagonal Krylov chain whose hopping parameters, the Verblunsky coefficients, decay differently for chaotic and integrable dynamics.

desk verdict A rigorous and useful Szegő/CMV Krylov construction for Floquet unitaries, attached to a conjectural and under-supported chaos/integrability classification. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.19797 v3 pith:HU5URD67 submitted 2024-12-27 quant-ph cond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-elhep-thnlin.CD

Nikita Kolganov , Dmitrii A. Trunin This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phcond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-elhep-thnlin.CD
keywords FloquetsystemsKrylovcomplexityorthogonalpolynomialsontheunitcircleCMVmatricesVerblunskycoefficientsquantumchaosintegrabilitytight-bindingchain
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that every discrete-time (Floquet) quantum evolution can be recast, through the theory of orthogonal polynomials on the unit circle, as a one-dimensional tight-binding Krylov chain, and that the chain's hopping parameters, the Verblunsky coefficients, encode whether the dynamics is chaotic or integrable. The construction runs as fast as the Lanczos algorithm and puts the evolution operator in five-diagonal form, so it is substantially cheaper than existing Krylov methods for driven systems and naturally suited to quantum circuits. The proposed classification says chaotic systems have $|\alpha_n|^2 \sim A/[\beta(d-n)/2+1]$ in the late chain, while integrable systems decay slower, $|\alpha_n|^2 > A/(d-n)^{1-\epsilon}$, which leads to Krylov delocalization versus localization. If the claims hold, this is a practical simulation shortcut and a new dynamical signature of ergodicity in driven many-body systems.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Szegő recurrence for orthogonal polynomials on the unit circle, which generates the Verblunsky coefficients $\alpha_n$, complex numbers with $|\alpha_n|\le1$ that act as hopping parameters of the Krylov chain. Its CMV basis organizes $U$ into a five-diagonal matrix built from $2\times2$ unitary blocks, giving an exact lattice representation and a two-step quantum circuit. The paper also derives the explicit tight-binding equation for the Krylov wavefunction, shows it reduces to a massless Klein-Gordon equation when $|\alpha_n|^2\ll1$, and connects real Verblunsky coefficients to Lanczos coefficients by $a_n=(-1)^n(\alpha_n+\alpha_{n-1})$, $b_n=\rho_{n-1}$. This machinery carries both the efficiency claim and the chaos/integrability classification.

What would settle it

Take a chaotic Floquet model, such as the kicked Ising chain with $L$ up to 16, and compute the Verblunsky coefficients from many random seed states; if for any seed state with Wigner-Dyson level statistics the large-$n$ decay systematically departs from $|\alpha_n|^2\sim A/[\beta(d-n)/2+1]$, or if an integrable model produces delocalized Krylov wavefunctions, the classification's universality fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes a general reduction: for any unitary one-period evolution $U$ and any seed state, the Szegő recurrence builds an orthonormal Krylov basis parametrized by complex Verblunsky coefficients $\alpha_n$, and the CMV variant of the basis makes $U$ five-diagonal, so the dynamics becomes a tight-binding model on the chain. On that basis it conjectures that the asymptotic decay of $|\alpha_n|^2$ classifies ergodic Floquet systems: chaotic systems follow a circular-$\beta$-ensemble-like decay $|\alpha_n|^2\sim A/[\beta(d-n)/2+1]$, integrable systems decay slower and localize the Krylov wavefunction, and a degenerate 'clock' class sits between them. The classification is tested on random coefficient ensembles, the kicked top, and the kicked Ising chain, and it reproduces the familiar level-spacing distinction while adding dynamical content.

Load-bearing premise

The classification assumes that Verblunsky coefficients of a typical seeding state in a generic physical Floquet system are statistically described by the random-coefficient ensembles (16b) and (16c); the paper itself states that in general the distribution depends on the initial state, and no theorem connects a many-body Hamiltonian to these distributions.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any Floquet dynamics can be simulated as a five-diagonal Krylov chain using about $2L$ CNOT gates on an $L$-qubit circuit, so larger Hilbert space dimensions become accessible in numerical experiments.
  • The asymptotic decay rate of Verblunsky coefficients provides a dynamical signature of chaos and integrability that can be read off without full diagonalization, complementing level-spacing statistics.
  • Integrable driven systems exhibit Krylov localization ($e^S\sim d^{1-\epsilon}$) while chaotic systems delocalize ($e^S\sim d$), quantifying how much of Hilbert space a given seed state explores.
  • For operator evolution, the construction maps to an inhomogeneous XY model and reproduces the real-coefficient case of earlier operator-only methods, extending them to arbitrary state dynamics.
  • The paper recommends replacing the 'maximally ergodic bath' approximation (all $\alpha_n\approx0$) by the chaotic decay law (ii) when simulating chaotic Floquet systems, since the former underestimates spreading for large finite $d$.
  • One could use the Verblunsky-coefficient asymptotics to probe ergodicity breaking in Floquet systems such as many-body scars or fragmented Hilbert spaces, as the paper suggests as future work.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One could turn the construction around and engineer Floquet systems with desired dynamics by prescribing a Verblunsky coefficient sequence, effectively designing Krylov Hamiltonians for quantum simulation or control.
  • The initial-state dependence acknowledged in the paper suggests that Verblunsky-coefficient statistics might map the phase-space structure of a mixed Floquet system, with regular islands producing locally integrable coefficient patches.
  • A natural stress test is to compute Verblunsky coefficient distributions for disordered or interacting driven models, such as many-body localized Floquet chains, and check whether the three-way classification (i)-(iii) remains stable or requires a disorder axis.
  • Because the CMV five-diagonal form is exact for any unitary, the efficiency claim is robust; the part most likely to need extension is the universality of the coefficient distributions, which may depend on the choice of seed state and conserved quantities.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper generalizes Krylov-space methods to Floquet (discrete-time) unitary dynamics by exploiting the theory of orthogonal polynomials on the unit circle. It constructs a CMV basis in which the Floquet operator becomes five-diagonal, proposes a faster algorithm for building this basis, and maps the dynamics to a tight-binding chain. The second half of the paper conjectures a classification of chaotic versus integrable Floquet systems based on the asymptotic decay of Verblunsky (hopping) coefficients, dividing them into 'degenerate', 'chaotic', and 'integrable' classes, and illustrates this classification with random-matrix ensembles, the kicked top, and the kicked Ising chain. The classification is used to predict Krylov delocalization for chaotic systems and Krylov localization for integrable ones.

Significance. The algorithmic part is a clean application of standard CMV/OPUC theory and is, as far as the reviewer can see, mathematically sound; it offers a convenient five-diagonal representation of Floquet evolution with potential value for classical and quantum simulation. If the classification part were validated, it would provide a new and intuitively appealing signature of chaos and integrability in driven quantum systems. However, the classification is presented as a conjecture and the numerical support is not yet quantitative: no fits to the proposed functional forms are shown, no best-fit parameters are given, and the paper's own conclusion admits that the Verblunsky-coefficient distribution generally depends on the initial state. The analytic estimate in Eq. (17) also appears to contain an error. The paper is therefore a promising but incomplete contribution that would benefit from a major revision.

major comments (4)
  1. [Signatures of chaos and integrability; Conclusion] The central classification claim is not quantitatively tested. The paper states that for a 'typical' seeding state the Verblunsky coefficients fall into one of the three classes (i)-(iii), but Figures 4(a) and 5(a) show only empirical distributions without fits to the functional forms (16a)-(16c), without best-fit parameters A, epsilon, beta, without error bars, and without a demonstration of initial-state independence. The Conclusion explicitly says that the distribution depends on the initial state in general, and footnote [101] concedes that in a mixed phase space the same Floquet operator can yield integrable-looking coefficients for some states and chaotic-looking ones for others. As stated, the 'classification of ergodic Floquet systems' is really a classification of the pair (U, |psi>). To make the claim credible, the authors should either provide a mechanism (theorem or systematic numerical ensemble study) linking many-body Hamiltonians to the coefficient distributions for typical states, or substantially qualify the title and abstract, e.g., 'classification of dynamics of typical seeding states'.
  2. [Eq. (17)] The claimed eigenvector localization behavior for the chaotic ensemble (ii) appears to be incorrect. For the distribution (16b), p(alpha) ~ (1 - |alpha|^2)^{beta(d-n)/2 - 1}, a direct calculation gives <rho_k^2> = 1 - 1/[beta(d-k)/2 + 1], so the product in Eq. (17) behaves as (1 - n/d)^{2/beta} (up to an A-dependent prefactor if |alpha_k|^2 carries a non-unit amplitude), not (1 - n/d)^{-1/(2 beta)}. The sign and the exponent are both different. This changes the quantitative delocalization prediction and should be corrected, with the numerical results in Figures 2 and 3 compared against the corrected formula.
  3. [Eq. (14)] The tight-binding equation (14) is asserted with 'Representation (12) also implies' but no derivation is provided. Since this equation is a central object of the paper -- the claimed one-dimensional tight-binding Krylov chain -- a derivation (likely from the CMV matrix product U = L M, together with the definition phi_n(t) = <P_n|P_0(t)>) should be included in an appendix or a reference should be given. Without this, the reader cannot verify the map or understand the high-frequency limit to the Lanczos model (4).
  4. [Introduction and Szego algorithm] The paper repeatedly claims that the method works 'substantially faster' than other approaches [51-56], but no concrete complexity comparison or benchmark is provided. Please state the scaling of the Szego and CMV algorithms (number of matrix-vector products, inner products, and orthogonalization steps) for a general d-dimensional unitary U, and compare explicitly with the Arnoldi iteration and direct diagonalization cited in the text. This is important for substantiating the 'streamlined' claim in the title and abstract.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Conclusion] The word 'Veblunsky' should be 'Verblunsky' in the first paragraph of the Conclusion.
  2. [Figure 2 caption] The caption writes 'K ∼ eS'; this should be 'K ∼ e^S' to denote the exponential of the K-entropy.
  3. [Introduction] The notation 'Texp' for the time-ordered exponential should be typeset properly, e.g., with a calligraphic T or an explicit definition, to avoid confusion with the period T.
  4. [Classification (i)-(iii)] The free parameter A is described only as 'chosen such that all coefficients lie inside the unit circle'; it is unclear how A is determined in the examples and whether the classification is sensitive to its value. A brief comment on the practical determination of A (and of beta and epsilon) would help the reader apply the classification.
  5. [Figure 4 caption] The caption says 'localization length' without specifying whether the plotted quantity is K, e^S, or a separately defined localization length; please define it in the caption or in the text.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Krylov/CMV construction is a direct application of standard orthogonal-polynomial theory, and the chaos/integrability classification is a clearly labeled conjecture supported by external numerical examples, not a reduction to its own inputs.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained on the mathematical side. The Szegő algorithm (Eq. 8) and CMV basis (Eqs. 10-12) are standard constructions from the theory of orthogonal polynomials on the unit circle, cited to external literature [43-46,65]; the tight-binding equation (14) follows from writing U in the five-diagonal CMV form and does not involve any fitted parameter. The level-statistics and localization statements (Eq. 17) are explicitly conditional statements about the random ensembles (16a-c), and they rely on the external Killip-Stoiciu theorem [69] for eigenvalue statistics and on rigorous localization results [84-86]. No fitted parameter is later relabeled as a prediction: for the kicked top and kicked Ising chain the paper generates Verblunsky coefficients from the unitary and compares them to the conjectured distributions, while the integrable/chaotic regimes are fixed by standard parameter choices from the literature [87,88,95,96]. The classification of physical Floquet systems is announced as a conjecture ('we conjecture that the sequence of Verblunsky coefficients generated by a typical seeding state in a quantum Floquet system falls into one of the following classes'), and the Conclusion explicitly acknowledges that 'in general, distribution of Verblunsky coefficients and Krylov localization length depends on the initial state'. That is an acknowledged limitation and a potential correctness risk, but it is not circular: the paper does not derive the physical classification from the random ensembles, nor does it use the classification to fit the ensembles. There are no load-bearing self-citations; the cited eigenvalue and localization facts are external. Hence no circularity is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles or mediators. Its explanatory burden is carried by the conjectured Verblunsky coefficient scalings, which act as free modeling assumptions, and by standard theorems from orthogonal polynomial and random matrix theory.

free parameters (3)
  • A = A is chosen only to keep all coefficients within the unit circle.
    Scale constant in the bounds (i)-(iii) and in the random distributions (16); it carries no predictive content beyond placing coefficients inside the unit disk.
  • epsilon = Epsilon is taken small and positive, with no fixed value.
    Exponent in the degenerate and integrable bounds; the paper does not fix it or derive it from the dynamics.
  • beta = Beta is set to 2 in the kicked top example and is not predicted from first principles.
    Slope parameter in the chaotic distribution (16b); the paper assigns beta = 2 for the kicked top and does not provide a general derivation.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Szegő recurrence and CMV matrix representation provide a complete orthonormal Krylov basis for any unitary U.
    Imported from the orthogonal polynomial literature (refs. 43-46, 65); used throughout the algorithm.
  • standard math Eigenvalue statistics of CMV matrices with random Verblunsky coefficients (16) converge to clock, circular beta, and Poisson ensembles respectively.
    External theorem of Killip and Stoiciu (ref. 69), used to connect coefficient decay with level repulsion.
  • domain assumption For the examples studied, the Krylov subspace dimension D equals the full Hilbert space dimension d.
    The paper's footnote 75 notes that this equality can fail, and asserts it does not occur in the examples; if false, the eigenvalue statistics probe only part of the spectrum.
  • ad hoc to paper The asymptotic bounds (i)-(iii) describe all non-degenerate physical Floquet systems for typical seeding states.
    This is the central conjecture of the paper, introduced in 'Signatures of chaos and integrability', and is not derived from the underlying dynamics.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Streamlined Krylov construction and classification of ergodic Floquet systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HU5URD67

@misc{pith2026241219797,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Streamlined Krylov construction and classification of ergodic Floquet systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HU5URD67}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.19797}
}
read the original abstract

We generalize Krylov construction to periodically driven (Floquet) quantum systems using the theory of orthogonal polynomials on the unit circle. Compared to other approaches, our method works faster and maps any quantum dynamics to a one-dimensional tight-binding Krylov chain, which is efficiently simulated on both classical and quantum computers. We also suggest a classification of chaotic and integrable Floquet systems based on the asymptotic behavior of Krylov chain hopping parameters (Verblunsky coefficients). We illustrate this classification with random matrix ensembles, kicked top, and kicked Ising chain.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.19797 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Quantum circuit implementing an arbitrary unitary [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Krylov localization length averaged over time, ini [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Ensemble-averaged localization length (a) and posi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Distribution of Verblunsky coefficients in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Verblunsky coefficients of a local operator in dual [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Crystalline Spectral Form Factors

    quant-ph 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Strong level repulsion produces damped crystalline oscillations of the spectral form factor, with a Debye-Waller suppression, a new plateau time scale t* ≈ t_H sqrt(β/4), and predictable derivative singularities.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

117 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [101]

    The simplest example is quantized system with a mixed phase space, where regular and chaotic regions coexist

  2. [1]

    J. M. Deutsch, Quantum statistical mechanics in a closed system, Phys. Rev. A43, 2046 (1991)

    1991

  3. [2]

    Srednicki, Chaos and quantum thermalization, Phys

    M. Srednicki, Chaos and quantum thermalization, Phys. Rev. E 50, 888 (1994), arXiv:cond-mat/9403051

    arXiv 1994

  4. [3]

    D’Alessio, Y

    L. D’Alessio, Y. Kafri, A. Polkovnikov, and M. Rigol, From quantum chaos and eigenstate thermalization to statistical mechanics and thermodynamics, Adv. Phys. 65, 239 (2016), arXiv:1509.06411

    arXiv 2016

  5. [4]

    Nandkishore and D

    R. Nandkishore and D. A. Huse, Many body localiza- tion and thermalization in quantum statistical mechan- ics, Ann. Rev. Condensed Matter Phys. 6, 15 (2015), arXiv:1404.0686

    arXiv 2015

  6. [5]

    Altman and R

    E. Altman and R. Vosk, Universal dynamics and renormalization in many body localized systems, Ann. Rev. Condensed Matter Phys. 6, 383 (2015), arXiv:1408.2834

    arXiv 2015

  7. [6]

    D. A. Abanin, E. Altman, I. Bloch, and M. Serbyn, Colloquium : Many-body localization, thermalization, and entanglement, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 021001 (2019), arXiv:1804.11065

    arXiv 2019

  8. [7]

    17, 675 (2021), arXiv:2011.09486

    M.Serbyn, D.A.Abanin,andZ.Papić,Quantummany- body scars and weak breaking of ergodicity, Nature Phys. 17, 675 (2021), arXiv:2011.09486

    arXiv 2021

Show all 117 references
  1. [8]

    Chandran, T

    A. Chandran, T. Iadecola, V. Khemani, and R. Moess- ner, Quantum many-body scars: A quasiparticle per- spective, Ann. Rev. Condensed Matter Phys. 14, 443 (2023), arXiv:2206.11528

    2023 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Moudgalya, B

    S. Moudgalya, B. A. Bernevig, and N. Regnault, Quan- tum many-body scars and Hilbert space fragmentation: a review of exact results, Rept. Prog. Phys.85, 086501 (2022), arXiv:2109.00548

    2022 arXiv

  3. [10]

    P. Sala, T. Rakovszky, R. Verresen, M. Knap, and F. Pollmann, Ergodicity-breaking arising from Hilbert space fragmentation in dipole-conserving Hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. X10, 011047 (2020), arXiv:1904.04266

    2020 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Khemani, M

    V. Khemani, M. Hermele, and R. Nandkishore, Local- ization from Hilbert space shattering: From theory to physical realizations, Phys. Rev. B101, 174204 (2020), arXiv:1904.04815

    2020 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Moudgalya and O

    S. Moudgalya and O. I. Motrunich, Hilbert space frag- mentation and commutant algebras, Phys. Rev. X12, 011050 (2022), arXiv:2108.10324

    2022 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Maldacena, S

    J. Maldacena, S. H. Shenker, and D. Stanford, A bound on chaos, J. High Energy Phys.2016 (08), 106, arXiv:1503.01409

    2016 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Swingle, Unscrambling the physics of out-of-time- order correlators, Nature Phys.14, 988 (2018)

    B. Swingle, Unscrambling the physics of out-of-time- order correlators, Nature Phys.14, 988 (2018)

    2018

  8. [15]

    Xu and B

    S. Xu and B. Swingle, Scrambling dynamics and out-of-time-ordered correlators in quantum many- body systems, PRX Quantum 5, 010201 (2024), arXiv:2202.07060

    2024 arXiv

  9. [16]

    D. E. Parker, X. Cao, A. Avdoshkin, T. Scaffidi, and E. Altman, A universal operator growth hypothesis, Phys. Rev. X9, 041017 (2019), arXiv:1812.08657

    2019 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Balasubramanian, P

    V. Balasubramanian, P. Caputa, J. M. Magan, and Q. Wu, Quantum chaos and the complexity of spread of states, Phys. Rev. D 106, 046007 (2022), arXiv:2202.06957

    2022 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Nandy, A

    P. Nandy, A. S. Matsoukas-Roubeas, P. Martínez- Azcona, A. Dymarsky, and A. del Campo, Quantum dynamics in Krylov space: methods and applications, arXiv:2405.09628

    arXiv

  12. [19]

    V. S. Viswanath and G. Müller,The Recursion Method: Applications to Many-Body Dynamics , Lecture Notes in Physics Monographs (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1994)

    1994

  13. [20]

    Motta et al., Determining eigenstates and thermal states on a quantum computer using quantum imag- inary time evolution, Nature Phys

    M. Motta et al., Determining eigenstates and thermal states on a quantum computer using quantum imag- inary time evolution, Nature Phys. 16, 205 (2019), arXiv:1901.07653

    2019 arXiv

  14. [21]

    N. H. Stair, R. Huang, and F. A. Evangelista, A mul- tireference quantum Krylov algorithm for strongly cor- related electrons, J. Chem. Theory Comput.16, 2236 (2020), arXiv:1911.05163

    2020 arXiv

  15. [22]

    C. L. Cortes and S. K. Gray, Quantum Krylov sub- space algorithms for ground- and excited-state energy estimation, Phys. Rev. A 105 105, 022417 (2022), arXiv:2109.06868

    2022 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Larocca and D

    M. Larocca and D. Wisniacki, Krylov-subspace ap- proach for the efficient control of quantum many- body dynamics, Phys. Rev. A 105103, 023107 (2021), arXiv:2010.03598

    2021 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Takahashi and A

    K. Takahashi and A. del Campo, Shortcuts to adiabatic- ity in Krylov space, Phys. Rev. X14, 011032 (2024), arXiv:2302.05460

    2024 arXiv

  18. [25]

    D. J. Yates, A. G. Abanov, and A. Mitra, Lifetime of al- moststrongedge-modeoperatorsinonedimensional, in- teracting, symmetry protected topological phases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 206803 (2020), arXiv:2002.00098

    2020 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Caputa and S

    P. Caputa and S. Liu, Quantum complexity and topo- logical phases of matter, Phys. Rev. B 106, 195125 (2022), arXiv:2205.05688

    2022 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Caputa, N

    P. Caputa, N. Gupta, S. S. Haque, S. Liu, J. Murugan, and H. J. R. Van Zyl, Spread complexity and topological transitions in the Kitaev chain, J. High Energy Phys. 2023 (01), 120, arXiv:2208.06311

    2023 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Bhattacharjee, S

    B. Bhattacharjee, S. Sur, and P. Nandy, Probing quan- tum scars and weak ergodicity breaking through quan- tum complexity, Phys. Rev. B 106, 205150 (2022), arXiv:2208.05503

    2022 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Bhattacharjee, X

    B. Bhattacharjee, X. Cao, P. Nandy, and T. Pathak, Krylov complexity in saddle-dominated scrambling, J. High Energy Phys.2022 (05), 174, arXiv:2203.03534

    2022 arXiv

  23. [30]

    High Energy Phys

    K.Hashimoto, K.Murata, N.Tanahashi,andR.Watan- abe, Krylov complexity and chaos in quantum me- 8 chanics, J. High Energy Phys. 2023 (11), 040, arXiv:2305.16669

    2023 arXiv

  24. [31]

    Dymarsky and M

    A. Dymarsky and M. Smolkin, Krylov complexity in conformal field theory, Phys. Rev. D 104, L081702 (2021), arXiv:2104.09514

    2021 arXiv

  25. [32]

    Avdoshkin, A

    A. Avdoshkin, A. Dymarsky, and M. Smolkin, Krylov complexityinquantumfieldtheory, andbeyond,J.High Energy Phys. 2024 (06), 066, arXiv:2212.14429

    2024 arXiv

  26. [33]

    J. L. F. Barbón, E. Rabinovici, R. Shir, and R. Sinha, On The evolution of operator complexity beyond scrambling, J. High Energy Phys. 2019 (10), 264, arXiv:1907.05393

    2019 arXiv

  27. [34]

    Rabinovici, A

    E. Rabinovici, A. Sánchez-Garrido, R. Shir, and J. Son- ner, Operator complexity: a journey to the edge of Krylov space, J. High Energy Phys. 2021 (06), 062, arXiv:2009.01862

    2021 arXiv

  28. [35]

    Rabinovici, A

    E. Rabinovici, A. Sánchez-Garrido, R. Shir, and J. Son- ner, Krylov complexity from integrability to chaos, J. High Energy Phys.2022 (07), 151, arXiv:2207.07701

    2022 arXiv

  29. [36]

    Rabinovici, A

    E. Rabinovici, A. Sánchez-Garrido, R. Shir, and J. Son- ner, A bulk manifestation of Krylov complexity, J. High Energy Phys. 2023 (08), 213, arXiv:2305.04355

    2023 arXiv

  30. [37]

    S.-K. Jian, B. Swingle, and Z.-Y. Xian, Complexity growthofoperatorsintheSYKmodelandinJTgravity, J. High Energy Phys.2021 (03), 014, arXiv:2008.12274

    2021 arXiv

  31. [38]

    Iizuka and M

    N. Iizuka and M. Nishida, Krylov complexity in the IP matrix model, J. High Energy Phys. 2023 (11), 065, arXiv:2306.04805

    2023 arXiv

  32. [39]

    Avdoshkin and A

    A. Avdoshkin and A. Dymarsky, Euclidean operator growth and quantum chaos, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 043234 (2020), arXiv:1911.09672

    2020 arXiv

  33. [40]

    Caputa, J

    P. Caputa, J. M. Magan, and D. Patramanis, Geometry of Krylov complexity, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 013041 (2022), arXiv:2109.03824

    2022 arXiv

  34. [41]

    Gorsky, S

    A. Gorsky, S. Nechaev, and A. Valov, KPZ scaling from the Krylov space, J. High Energy Phys.2024 (09), 021, arXiv:2406.02782

    2024 arXiv

  35. [42]

    R. N. Das, S. Demulder, J. Erdmenger, and C. Northe, Spread complexity for the planar limit of holography, arXiv:2412.09673

    arXiv

  36. [43]

    Szegő, Orthogonal Polynomials, Colloquium Publi- cations, Vol

    G. Szegő, Orthogonal Polynomials, Colloquium Publi- cations, Vol. 23 (American Mathematical Society, Prov- idence, RI, 1939)

    1939

  37. [44]

    Simon, Orthogonal Polynomials on the Unit Circle , ColloquiumPublications, Vol.54(AmericanMathemat- ical Society, Providence, RI, 2005)

    B. Simon, Orthogonal Polynomials on the Unit Circle , ColloquiumPublications, Vol.54(AmericanMathemat- ical Society, Providence, RI, 2005)

    2005

  38. [45]

    M. E. H. Ismail, Classical and Quantum Orthogonal Polynomials in One Variable , Encyclopedia of Math- ematics and its Applications (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005)

    2005

  39. [46]

    M. E. H. Ismail and W. Van Assche,Univariate Orthog- onal Polynomials , Encyclopedia of Special Functions: The Askey-Bateman Project, Vol 1. (Cambridge Uni- versity Press, Cambridge, 2020)

    2020

  40. [47]

    Mück and Y

    W. Mück and Y. Yang, Krylov complexity and orthog- onal polynomials, Nucl. Phys. B 984, 115948 (2022), arXiv:2205.12815

    2022 arXiv

  41. [48]

    D. J. Yates, A. G. Abanov, and A. Mitra, Long-lived period-doubled edge modes of interacting and disorder- free Floquet spin chains, Commun. Phys.5, 43 (2022), arXiv:2105.13766

    2022 arXiv

  42. [49]

    D. J. Yates and A. Mitra, Strong and almost strong modes of Floquet spin chains in Krylov subspaces, Phys. Rev. B 104, 195121 (2021), arXiv:2105.13246

    2021 arXiv

  43. [50]

    H.-Y. Qi, Y. Wu, and W. Zheng, Topological origin of Floquet thermalization in periodically driven many- body systems, arXiv:2404.18052

    arXiv

  44. [51]

    A. A. Nizami and A. W. Shrestha, Krylov construction and complexity for driven quantum systems, Phys. Rev. E 108, 054222 (2023), arXiv:2305.00256

    2023 arXiv

  45. [52]

    A. A. Nizami and A. W. Shrestha, Spread complexity and quantum chaos for periodically driven spin chains, Phys. Rev. E110, 034201 (2024), arXiv:2405.16182

    2024 arXiv

  46. [53]

    Suchsland, R

    P. Suchsland, R. Moessner, and P. W. Claeys, Krylov complexity and Trotter transitions in unitary circuit dy- namics, arXiv:2308.03851

    arXiv

  47. [54]

    G. F. Scialchi, A. J. Roncaglia, C. Pineda, and D. A. Wisniacki,Exploringquantumergodicityofunitaryevo- lution through the Krylov approach, arXiv:2407.06428

    arXiv

  48. [55]

    Yeh and A

    H.-C. Yeh and A. Mitra, Universal model of Floquet op- erator Krylov space, Phys. Rev. B110, 155109 (2024), arXiv:2311.15116

    2024 arXiv

  49. [56]

    Yeh and A

    H.-C. Yeh and A. Mitra, Moment method and continued fraction expansion in Floquet Operator Krylov Space, arXiv:2410.15223

    arXiv

  50. [57]

    The approach of [55, 56] relies on the peculiarities of operator evolution and always generates real Verblun- sky coefficients; so, it constructs a Krylov basis for any operator evolution, but not for any state evolution

  51. [58]

    Dymarsky and A

    A. Dymarsky and A. Gorsky, Quantum chaos as delo- calization in Krylov space, Phys. Rev. B102, 085137 (2020), arXiv:1912.12227

    2020 arXiv

  52. [59]

    F. B. Trigueros and C.-J. Lin, Krylov complex- ity of many-body localization: Operator localiza- tion in Krylov basis, SciPost Phys. 13, 037 (2022), arXiv:2112.04722

    2022 arXiv

  53. [60]

    Rabinovici, A

    E. Rabinovici, A. Sánchez-Garrido, R. Shir, and J. Son- ner, Krylov localization and suppression of complexity, J. High Energy Phys.2022 (03), 211, arXiv:2112.12128

    2022 arXiv

  54. [61]

    H. G. Menzler and R. Jha, Krylov delocaliza- tion/localization across ergodicity breaking, Phys. Rev. B 110, 125137 (2024), arXiv:2403.14384

    2024 arXiv

  55. [62]

    Y.A.AlaouiandB.Laburthe-Tolra,Methodtodiscrim- inate between localized and chaotic quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 043045 (2024), arXiv:2307.10706

    2024 arXiv

  56. [63]

    M.AlishahihaandM.J.Vasli,ThermalizationinKrylov basis, arXiv:2403.06655

    arXiv

  57. [64]

    However, these states are orthogonal to Krylov basis states generated after stepn: ⟨Φm| ˜Φn⟩ = 0 for m > n

    Note that the set of states| ˜Φn⟩ is normalized but not orthogonal: ⟨ ˜Φn| ˜Φn⟩ = 1 but ⟨ ˜Φm| ˜Φn⟩ ̸= 0 for m ̸= n. However, these states are orthogonal to Krylov basis states generated after stepn: ⟨Φm| ˜Φn⟩ = 0 for m > n. Besides, ⟨ ˜Φm|U | ˜Φn⟩ = 0 and ⟨ ˜Φm|U |Φn⟩ = 0 for m > n

  58. [65]

    M. J. Cantero, L. Moral, and L. Velazquez, Five- diagonal matrices and zeros of orthogonal polynomials on the unit circle, Linear Algebra Appl.362, 29 (2003), arXiv:math/0204300

    2003 arXiv

  59. [66]

    To restrict the dimension of the subspace simulated on the L-qubit circuit toD <2L, one simply needs to set |αn| = 1 for n ≥ D, which decouples this subspace from the rest of the Hilbert space

  60. [67]

    V. V. Shende, I. L. Markov, and S. S. Bullock, Minimal universal two-qubit controlled-NOT-based cir- cuits, Phys. Rev. A 69, 062321 (2004), arXiv:quant- ph/0308033

    2004

  61. [68]

    V. V. Shende, S. S. Bullock, and I. L. Markov, Syn- thesis of quantum-logic circuits, IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Design Integr. Circuits Syst. 25, 1000 (2006), 9 arXiv:quant-ph/0406176

    2006 arXiv

  62. [69]

    Killip and M

    R. Killip and M. Stoiciu, Eigenvalue statistics for CMV matrices: From Poisson to clock via random matrix en- sembles, Duke Math. J. 146, 361 (2009), arXiv:math- ph/0608002

    2009

  63. [70]

    Killip and I

    R. Killip and I. Nenciu, Matrix models for circular ensembles, Int. Math. Res. Not. 2004, 2665 (2004), arXiv:math/0410034

    2004 arXiv

  64. [71]

    Dumitriu and A

    I. Dumitriu and A. Edelman, Matrix models for beta ensembles, J. Math. Phys.43, 5830 (2002), arXiv:math- ph/0206043

    2002

  65. [72]

    A. K. Das and A. Ghosh, Nonergodic extended states in the β ensemble, Phys. Rev. E 105, 054121 (2022), arXiv:2112.11910

    2022 arXiv

  66. [73]

    Balasubramanian, J

    V. Balasubramanian, J. M. Magan, and Q. Wu, Tridiag- onalizing random matrices, Phys. Rev. D107, 126001 (2023), arXiv:2208.08452

    2023 arXiv

  67. [74]

    Forafinite d, Verblunskycoefficientsmightdeviatefrom these distributions, but the average magnitude of devi- ations goes to zero asd → ∞

  68. [75]

    The main loophole is that the dimension of the Krylov subspace might be smaller than the total Hilbert space dimension, so it captures only a fraction of energy levels

    Note that the eigenvalue distribution of the Krylov chain is only an indirect probe of chaoticity of the orig- inal many-body dynamics. The main loophole is that the dimension of the Krylov subspace might be smaller than the total Hilbert space dimension, so it captures only a...

  69. [76]

    Circular β-ensemble includes the orthogonal (β = 1), unitary (β = 2), and symplectic (β = 4) ensembles

  70. [77]

    Oganesyan and D

    V. Oganesyan and D. A. Huse, Localization of inter- acting fermions at high temperature, Phys. Rev. B75, 155111 (2007), arXiv:cond-mat/0610854

    2007 arXiv

  71. [78]

    Y. Y. Atas, E. Bogomolny, O. Giraud, and G. Roux, Distribution of the ratio of consecutive level spacings in random matrix ensembles, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 084101 (2013), arXiv:1212.5611

    2013 arXiv

  72. [79]

    Haake, Quantum Signatures of Chaos (Springer- Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2010)

    F. Haake, Quantum Signatures of Chaos (Springer- Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2010)

    2010

  73. [80]

    Stöckmann, Quantum Chaos: An Introduction (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1999)

    H.-J. Stöckmann, Quantum Chaos: An Introduction (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1999)

    1999

  74. [81]

    M. V. Berry and M. Tabor, Level clustering in the reg- ular spectrum, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A356, 375 (1977)

    1977

  75. [82]

    Bohigas, M

    O. Bohigas, M. J. Giannoni, and C. Schmit, Character- ization of chaotic quantum spectra and universality of level fluctuation laws, Phys. Rev. Lett.52, 1 (1984)

    1984

  76. [83]

    However, the qualitative prediction eS ∼ d1−ϵ re-emerges after averaging over eigenvectors

    In fact, eigenvectors of a non-averaged U are local- ized around different sites and usually have different lo- calization lengths. However, the qualitative prediction eS ∼ d1−ϵ re-emerges after averaging over eigenvectors

  77. [84]

    A. V. Teplyaev, The pure point spectrum of random orthogonal polynomials on the circle, Dokl. Akad. Nauk 320, 49 (1991), [Dokl. Math.44, 407 (1992)]

    1991

  78. [85]

    Cedzich and A

    C. Cedzich and A. H. Werner, Anderson localiza- tion for electric quantum walks and skew-shift CMV matrices, Commun. Math. Phys. 387, 1257 (2021), arXiv:1906.11931

    2021 arXiv

  79. [86]

    Zhu, Localization for random CMV matrices, J

    X. Zhu, Localization for random CMV matrices, J. Ap- prox. Theory 298, 106008 (2024), arXiv:2110.11386

    2024 arXiv

  80. [87]

    Physik B65, 381 (1987)

    F.Haake, M.Kuś,andR.Scharf,Classicalandquantum chaos for a kicked top, Z. Physik B65, 381 (1987)

    1987

  81. [88]

    F. M. Izrailev, Simple models of quantum chaos: Spec- trum and eigenfunctions, Phys. Rept.196, 299 (1990)

    1990

  82. [89]

    E. B. Rozenbaum, S. Ganeshan, and V. Galitski, Lya- punov exponent and out-of-time-ordered correlator’s growth rate in a chaotic system, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 086801 (2017), arXiv:1609.01707

    2017 arXiv

  83. [90]

    Vallini and S

    E. Vallini and S. Pappalardi, Long-time freeness in the kicked top, arXiv:2411.12050

    arXiv

  84. [91]

    Chaudhury, A

    S. Chaudhury, A. Smith, B. E. Anderson, S. Ghose, and P. S. Jessen, Quantum signatures of chaos in a kicked top, Nature 461, 768 (2009)

    2009

  85. [92]

    Neill et al

    C. Neill et al. , Ergodic dynamics and thermalization in an isolated quantum system, Nature Phys.12, 1037 (2016), arXiv:1601.00600

    2016 arXiv

  86. [93]

    This approach allows us to get cleaner results for small Hilbert space dimensions, but superfluous ford >103

  87. [94]

    M. V. Berry, Semi-classical mechanics in phase space: A study of Wigner’s function, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 287, 237 (1977)

    1977

  88. [95]

    Prosen, Exact time-correlation functions of quantum Ising chain in a kicking transversal magnetic field: spec- tralanalysisoftheadjointpropagatorinHeisenbergpic- ture, Prog

    T. Prosen, Exact time-correlation functions of quantum Ising chain in a kicking transversal magnetic field: spec- tralanalysisoftheadjointpropagatorinHeisenbergpic- ture, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl.139, 191 (2000)

    2000

  89. [96]

    Prosen, On general relation between quantum ergod- icityandfidelityofquantumdynamics,Phys.Rev.E 65, 036208 (2002), arXiv:quant-ph/0106149

    T. Prosen, On general relation between quantum ergod- icityandfidelityofquantumdynamics,Phys.Rev.E 65, 036208 (2002), arXiv:quant-ph/0106149

    2002 arXiv

  90. [97]

    Pineda and T

    C. Pineda and T. Prosen, Non-universal level statis- tics in a chaotic quantum spin chain, Phys. Rev. E76, 061127 (2007), arXiv:quant-ph/0702164

    2007 arXiv

  91. [98]

    Bertini, P

    B. Bertini, P. Kos, and T. Prosen, Exact spectral form factorinaminimalmodelofmany-bodyquantumchaos, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 264101 (2018), arXiv:1805.00931

    2018 arXiv

  92. [99]

    B.Bertini, P.Kos,andT.Prosen,Entanglementspread- inginaminimalmodelofmaximalmany-bodyquantum chaos,Phys.Rev.X 9,021033(2019),arXiv:1812.05090

    2019 arXiv

  93. [100]

    Akila, D

    M. Akila, D. Waltner, B. Gutkin, and T. Guhr, Particle- time duality in the kicked Ising spin chain, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 49, 375101 (2016), arXiv:1602.07130

    2016 arXiv

  94. [102]

    M. P. A. Fisher, V. Khemani, A. Nahum, and S. Vi- jay, Random quantum circuits, Ann. Rev. Condensed Matter Phys. 14, 335 (2023), arXiv:2207.14280

    2023 arXiv

  95. [103]

    Khemani, A

    V. Khemani, A. Vishwanath, and D. A. Huse, Opera- tor spreading and the emergence of dissipation in uni- tary dynamics with conservation laws, Phys. Rev. X8, 031057 (2018), arXiv:1710.09835

    2018 arXiv

  96. [104]

    Arute et al

    F. Arute et al. , Quantum supremacy using a pro- grammable superconducting processor, Nature574, 505 (2019), arXiv:1910.11333

    2019 arXiv

  97. [105]

    Bertini, P

    B. Bertini, P. Kos, and T. Prosen, Exact correla- tion functions for dual-unitary lattice models in 1+1 dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 210601 (2019), arXiv:1904.02140

    2019 arXiv

  98. [106]

    Fritzsch and T

    F. Fritzsch and T. Prosen, Eigenstate thermaliza- tion in dual-unitary quantum circuits: Asymptotics of spectral functions, Phys. Rev. E 103, 062133 (2021), arXiv:2103.11694

    2021 arXiv

  99. [107]

    S.GopalakrishnanandA.Lamacraft,Unitarycircuitsof finite depth and infinite width from quantum channels, Phys. Rev. B100, 064309 (2019), arXiv:1903.11611

    2019 arXiv

  100. [108]

    Lerose, M

    A. Lerose, M. Sonner, and D. A. Abanin, Influence ma- trix approach to many-body Floquet dynamics, Phys. Rev. X 11, 021040 (2021), arXiv:2009.10105

    2021 arXiv

  101. [109]

    H. C. Po, L. Fidkowski, T. Morimoto, A. C. Potter, and A. Vishwanath, Chiral Floquet phases of many- body localized bosons, Phys. Rev. X6, 041070 (2016), 10 arXiv:1609.00006

    2016 arXiv

  102. [110]

    Nathan, D

    F. Nathan, D. Abanin, E. Berg, N. H. Lindner, and M. S. Rudner, Anomalous Floquet insulators, Phys. Rev. B 99, 195133 (2019), arXiv:1712.02789

    2019 arXiv

  103. [111]

    Wilczek, Quantum time crystals, Phys

    F. Wilczek, Quantum time crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 160401 (2012), arXiv:1202.2539

    2012 arXiv

  104. [112]

    Khemani, A

    V. Khemani, A. Lazarides, R. Moessner, and S. L. Sondhi, Phase structure of driven quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 250401 (2016), arXiv:1508.03344

    2016 arXiv

  105. [113]

    D. V. Else, B. Bauer, and C. Nayak, Floquet time crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 090402 (2016), arXiv:1603.08001

    2016 arXiv

  106. [114]

    Choi et al., Observation of discrete time-crystalline order in a disordered dipolar many-body system, Nature 543, 221 (2017), arXiv:1610.08057

    S. Choi et al., Observation of discrete time-crystalline order in a disordered dipolar many-body system, Nature 543, 221 (2017), arXiv:1610.08057

    2017 arXiv

  107. [115]

    Zhang et al., Observation of a discrete time crystal, Nature 543, 217 (2017), arXiv:1609.08684

    J. Zhang et al., Observation of a discrete time crystal, Nature 543, 217 (2017), arXiv:1609.08684

    2017 arXiv

  108. [116]

    Derevyagin, L

    M. Derevyagin, L. Vinet, and A. Zhedanov, CMV ma- trices and little and big−1 Jacobi polynomials, Constr. Approx. 36, 513 (2012), arXiv:1108.3535

    2012 arXiv

  109. [117]

    M. J. Cantero, F. Marcellán, L. Moral, and L. Ve- lazquez, A CMV connection between orthogonal poly- nomials on the unit circle and the real line, J. Approx. Theory 266, 105579 (2021), arXiv:2005.09772

    2021 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.