REVIEW 7 cited by
HumanEval Pro and MBPP Pro: Evaluating Large Language Models on Self-invoking Code Generation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
HumanEval Pro and MBPP Pro: Evaluating Large Language Models on Self-invoking Code Generation
read the original abstract
We introduce self-invoking code generation, a new task designed to evaluate the progressive reasoning and problem-solving capabilities of LLMs. In this task, models are presented with a base problem and a related, more complex problem. They must solve the base problem and then utilize its solution to address the more complex one. This work features three key contributions. First, we propose a general recipe for generating more challenging versions of existing benchmarks, resulting in three new benchmarks: HumanEval Pro, MBPP Pro, and BigCodeBench-Lite Pro, specifically designed to assess LLMs on self-invoking code generation. Second, from the analysis of experimental results over twenty LLMs on our benchmarks, we have two important observations: (i) Most LLMs excel in traditional code generation benchmarks like HumanEval and MBPP, but their performance declines on self-invoking tasks. For example, o1-mini achieves 96.2% pass@1 on HumanEval but only 76.2% on HumanEval Pro. (ii) On self-invoking code generation task, the instruction-tuned models demonstrate only marginal improvements compared to the base models. Third, we disclose the types of failure modes that exist in our evaluation results. All these results underscore the need for further advancements in self-invoking code generation tasks and provide a new direction for future research on enhancing LLMs' code reasoning capabilities.
Forward citations
Cited by 7 Pith papers
-
Intent2Tx: Benchmarking LLMs for Translating Natural Language Intents into Ethereum Transactions
Intent2Tx shows that LLMs often generate syntactically valid but functionally incorrect Ethereum transactions, especially on multi-step and out-of-distribution intents, despite gains from scaling and retrieval augmentation.
-
ACPO: Adaptive Credit Policy Optimization via Fine-Grained Surrogate Entropy
Mode-local surrogate entropy asymmetrically reweights token advantages in RLVR, improving LLM math and code reasoning over SAPO, DAPO, and GTPO.
-
SWE Atlas: Benchmarking Coding Agents Beyond Issue Resolution
SWE Atlas is a benchmark suite for coding agents that evaluates Codebase Q&A, Test Writing, and Refactoring using comprehensive protocols assessing both functional correctness and software engineering quality.
-
Agentic Frameworks for Reasoning Tasks: An Empirical Study
An empirical evaluation of 22 agentic frameworks on BBH, GSM8K, and ARC benchmarks shows stable performance in 12 frameworks but highlights orchestration failures and weaker mathematical reasoning.
-
CodeGolf Bench: A Multi-Language Benchmark for Evaluating Concise Code Generation Capabilities of Large Language Models
CodeGolf Bench is a dynamic benchmark for LLM concise code generation in 60 languages, showing reasoning models reach 70.97% average human percentile on Python and C++ tasks while non-reasoning models lag.
-
A-ProS: Towards Reliable Autonomous Programming Through Multi-Model Feedback
A-ProS uses a hybrid multi-model feedback framework with stateful refinement to improve success rates on competitive programming problems, achieving over 2x gains compared to baseline agent loops.
-
LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems for Code Generation: A Multi-Vocal Literature Review
A review of 114 studies classifies motivations into nine categories, analyzes common models and benchmarks, synthesizes challenges into six categories with 26 subcategories and solutions, and identifies six future res...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.