pith. sign in

arxiv: 2501.00607 · v1 · submitted 2024-12-31 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.CO· cond-mat.str-el· gr-qc· hep-th

Topological Leptogenesis

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 06:23 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.COcond-mat.str-elgr-qchep-th
keywords topological leptogenesisB-L anomalytopological orderlepton asymmetrybeyond standard modeldark matteranyontopological quantum field theory
0
0 comments X

The pith

A gapped topological order sector cancels the Standard Model B-L mixed anomaly and generates lepton asymmetry via defect decays into particles.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes topological leptogenesis as an alternative explanation for the observed lepton asymmetry. It replaces part of the usual sterile neutrino mechanism with a new gapped topological order sector whose low-energy description is a topological quantum field theory. This sector cancels the baryon-minus-lepton mixed gauge-gravitational anomaly of the Standard Model. The beyond-Standard-Model dark matter then consists of topological quantum matter whose extended line and surface defects carry fractional charges and anyons; these non-particle excitations decay into Standard Model particles to produce the asymmetry. Gravitational leptogenesis is positioned as an intermediate step linking particle decays to the entangled topological states.

Core claim

Topological leptogenesis replaces some sterile right-handed neutrinos with a gapped topological order sector that cancels the B-L mixed gauge-gravitational anomaly of the Standard Model. The Beyond-the-Standard-Model dark matter is topological quantum matter whose gapped non-particle excitations—extended line and surface defects with fractionalization and anyon charges—decay into Standard Model particles, thereby generating the lepton asymmetry. Gravitational leptogenesis mediates the transition from Majorana particle leptogenesis to this non-particle topological process.

What carries the argument

The gapped topological order sector (low-energy topological quantum field theory with long-range entanglement) whose extended defects carry fractionalization and anyon charges, canceling the SM B-L anomaly while decaying into SM particles.

If this is right

  • The BSM dark matter is topological quantum matter rather than conventional particles.
  • Lepton asymmetry is generated by decays of gapped non-particle excitations instead of solely by sterile neutrino decays.
  • Gravitational leptogenesis acts as an intermediate mediator between particle and topological non-particle mechanisms.
  • The mechanism addresses the baryon asymmetry problem by leveraging long-range entanglement in the topological sector.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The proposal links high-energy cosmology to topological phases studied in condensed-matter systems through shared use of anyonic defects and anomaly cancellation.
  • Future gravitational-wave observatories could search for signals from the decay of topological line and surface defects.
  • If the topological sector is realized, dark-matter direct-detection experiments would need to account for fractional charges carried by extended objects rather than point particles.
  • The framework suggests that anomaly cancellation alone can replace part of the usual particle content in leptogenesis models.

Load-bearing premise

A gapped topological order sector exists beyond the Standard Model, cancels the B-L mixed gauge-gravitational anomaly, and possesses line and surface defects with anyon charges that decay into Standard Model particles.

What would settle it

Cosmological or collider data showing that lepton asymmetry requires only particle decays from heavy Majorana neutrinos without signatures of extended topological defects or anomaly cancellation by non-particle excitations would falsify the mechanism.

read the original abstract

In the standard lore, the baryon asymmetry of the present universe is attributed to the leptogenesis from the sterile right-handed neutrino with heavy Majorana mass decaying into the Standard Model's leptons at the very early universe -- called the Majorana fermion's leptogenesis; while the electroweak sphaleron causes baryogenesis at a later time. In this work, we propose a new mechanism, named topological leptogenesis, to explain the lepton asymmetry. Topological leptogenesis replaces some of the sterile neutrinos by introducing a new gapped topological order sector (whose low-energy exhibits topological quantum field theory with long-range entanglement) that can cancel the baryon minus lepton $({\bf B} - {\bf L})$ mixed gauge-gravitational anomaly of the Standard Model. Then the Beyond-the-Standard-Model dark matter consists of topological quantum matter, such that the gapped non-particle excitations of extended line and surface defect with fractionalization and anyon charges can decay into the Standard Model particles. In addition, gravitational leptogenesis can be regarded as an intermediate step (between Majorana particle leptogenesis and topological non-particle leptogenesis) to mediate such decaying processes from the highly entangled gapped topological order excitations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a new mechanism called topological leptogenesis to explain the observed lepton asymmetry. It replaces (some) sterile neutrinos with a gapped topological order sector whose low-energy description is a TQFT with long-range entanglement; this sector is claimed to cancel the Standard Model's B-L mixed gauge-gravitational anomaly. The BSM dark matter is identified with topological quantum matter whose gapped non-particle excitations (extended line and surface defects carrying fractional anyon charges) decay into Standard Model particles, thereby generating the asymmetry. Gravitational leptogenesis is positioned as an intermediate step mediating these decays.

Significance. If the central proposal could be made rigorous, it would constitute a genuinely novel conceptual link between leptogenesis, anomaly cancellation, and topological phases of matter, potentially accounting for both the baryon asymmetry and dark matter via non-particle excitations rather than heavy fermions. The idea draws on established notions from condensed-matter TQFT and anomaly inflow but would require explicit constructions to become a calculable alternative to standard leptogenesis.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that a gapped topological order sector cancels the SM B-L mixed gauge-gravitational anomaly is asserted without any explicit TQFT action (e.g., 4d BF theory, higher-form Chern-Simons term, or lattice regularization), anomaly coefficient computation, or inflow matching to the SM chiral-fermion contribution.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: No derivation, even schematic, is supplied for how the decay of line and surface defects carrying fractional anyon charges produces a net lepton asymmetry, including the required CP violation, departure from equilibrium, or washout suppression.
  3. [Abstract] Abstract: The statement that gravitational leptogenesis mediates the process between Majorana and topological leptogenesis is presented as an intermediate step but is not accompanied by any effective Lagrangian, coupling, or rate estimate connecting the topological defects to SM fields.
minor comments (2)
  1. The boldface notation (B - L) is nonstandard; conventional B-L or B−L would improve readability.
  2. The manuscript would benefit from a brief comparison table or paragraph contrasting the parameter count and testable signatures of topological leptogenesis versus standard Majorana leptogenesis.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thoughtful review and for highlighting areas where the proposal requires further clarification. The manuscript is intended as a conceptual outline of a new mechanism linking topological order, anomaly cancellation, and leptogenesis rather than a fully rigorous construction. We address each major comment below and indicate planned revisions where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that a gapped topological order sector cancels the SM B-L mixed gauge-gravitational anomaly is asserted without any explicit TQFT action (e.g., 4d BF theory, higher-form Chern-Simons term, or lattice regularization), anomaly coefficient computation, or inflow matching to the SM chiral-fermion contribution.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript presents this at a conceptual level without an explicit TQFT action or coefficient computation. The proposal relies on the established principle that a suitable gapped topological sector can cancel the SM anomaly via inflow, consistent with known results in condensed-matter TQFT. In a revised version we will add a schematic example using a 4d BF theory with level chosen to match the SM B-L mixed anomaly coefficient and briefly discuss the inflow matching to the chiral fermion contribution. A complete lattice regularization lies beyond the scope of this work and would require a dedicated technical follow-up. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: No derivation, even schematic, is supplied for how the decay of line and surface defects carrying fractional anyon charges produces a net lepton asymmetry, including the required CP violation, departure from equilibrium, or washout suppression.

    Authors: The manuscript proposes the mechanism at a high level by analogy with standard leptogenesis, where the fractional anyon charges on extended defects replace the role of heavy Majorana fermions. We will revise to include a schematic outline: CP violation can arise from the topological braiding phases of the anyons, the gapped spectrum ensures departure from equilibrium during the early universe, and topological protection helps suppress washout processes. Quantitative rates and explicit CP-violating phases depend on the choice of TQFT and are left for future detailed model building. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The statement that gravitational leptogenesis mediates the process between Majorana and topological leptogenesis is presented as an intermediate step but is not accompanied by any effective Lagrangian, coupling, or rate estimate connecting the topological defects to SM fields.

    Authors: We will revise the manuscript to clarify the mediating role by sketching an effective description in which gravitational interactions (via the mixed gauge-gravitational anomaly) couple the topological defects to SM leptons. This draws on existing gravitational leptogenesis literature but does not include new rate estimates, as those would require a fully specified TQFT and defect spectrum. The revision will add a short paragraph outlining the effective coupling without claiming quantitative predictions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: proposal introduces new sector without reducing claims to inputs by construction.

full rationale

The manuscript proposes a new topological leptogenesis mechanism in which a gapped topological order sector cancels the SM B-L mixed gauge-gravitational anomaly and supplies decaying line/surface defects that generate lepton asymmetry. No equations, fitted parameters, or derivations are exhibited that equate the central claims to their own inputs (no self-definitional relations, no fitted-input-called-prediction, no load-bearing self-citation chains, and no ansatz smuggled via prior work). The argument rests on standard anomaly concepts and posits the existence of the topological sector as an independent Beyond-Standard-Model ingredient; the derivation chain therefore remains self-contained and non-circular.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on the postulation of new topological entities and their interactions without independent evidence or derivations; these are introduced ad hoc to address the anomaly and asymmetry.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The Standard Model carries a B-L mixed gauge-gravitational anomaly that must be cancelled for consistency.
    Invoked directly in the abstract as the quantity the new sector cancels.
  • ad hoc to paper Gapped topological orders with long-range entanglement described by TQFT can be realized beyond the Standard Model and interact with SM fields via defect decays.
    Central assumption of the proposal not derived from prior literature.
invented entities (2)
  • gapped topological order sector no independent evidence
    purpose: Cancels the B-L anomaly and constitutes BSM dark matter whose excitations generate lepton asymmetry.
    Newly postulated sector whose existence and properties are not supported by evidence outside the proposal.
  • extended line and surface defects with fractionalization and anyon charges no independent evidence
    purpose: Provide the non-particle excitations that decay into SM particles to produce the asymmetry.
    Invented defect excitations introduced without independent falsifiable handles.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5737 in / 1866 out tokens · 75809 ms · 2026-05-23T06:23:15.001543+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages · 9 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The continuous baryon B minus lepton L number symmetry, U(1)B−L is preserved within the SM. More precisely, to have a properly quantized charge, it is better to scale U(1) B−L by a factor of color number Nc as the quark Q number minus Nc lepton L number symmetry, U(1) Q−NcL, where the color number is Nc = 3 in the SM. So the properly quantized charge is i...

  2. [2]

    But the U(1) B or U(1)L alone, each individually, does have mixed anomaly withsu(2)×u(1) ˜Y

    U(1) B−L (or more precisely U(1) Q−NcL) is mixed anomaly-free with the SM Lie algebra GSM ≡ su(3) × su(2) × u(1) ˜Y , or any of the four versions of the SM gauge group GSM ≡ (SU(3) × SU(2) × U(1) ˜Y )/Zq gauge group for q = 1, 2, 3, 6 [28]. But the U(1) B or U(1)L alone, each individually, does have mixed anomaly withsu(2)×u(1) ˜Y . We write Nf = 3 famili...

  3. [3]

    The light neutrino mass here requires a new mechanism

    Gravitational leptogenesis by itself [10] originally does not provide light neutrino mass. The light neutrino mass here requires a new mechanism. Proposals along this direction can be found in [29, 30]

  4. [4]

    But a new U(1) photon of dynamically gauged gauge ( B − L) contradicts with experiments in nature

    The continuous U(1) of ( B − L) is unbroken from the IR to the deep UV, thus it has to be dynamically gauged to be consistent with the quantum gravity argument (References therein [31]). But a new U(1) photon of dynamically gauged gauge ( B − L) contradicts with experiments in nature

  5. [5]

    The full theory better to be fully anomaly-free thus in a trivial cobordism class [31] in the sense of [26, 27]

    The model itself is gravitational anomalous, so this proposal alone may not be a final story in a dynamical gravity theory or in full quantum gravity. The full theory better to be fully anomaly-free thus in a trivial cobordism class [31] in the sense of [26, 27]. Majorana leptogenesis can rescue some of these challenges. III. MAJORANA LEPTOGENESIS The pop...

  6. [6]

    So it is curious how that the broken B − L re-emerge at the SM scale as a good nearly-anomaly-free continuous global symmetry U(1) Q−NcL back in the SM at IR

    The νR Majorana mass term already breaks the U(1) version of B − L (namely U(1) Q−NcL) down to fermion parity ZF 2 at its mass energy scale M at UV. So it is curious how that the broken B − L re-emerge at the SM scale as a good nearly-anomaly-free continuous global symmetry U(1) Q−NcL back in the SM at IR. From the renormalization group (RG) and IR effect...

  7. [7]

    spontaneous symmetry breaking

    Once the U(1) version of B − L (namely U(1)Q−NcL) is broken by νR Majorana mass term at UV, there imposes no direct IR constraint to demand the 16th Weyl fermion νR to cancel the SM’s B − L anomaly. Because there is no B − L anomaly at UV when B − L is already broken at UV. So it seems that more nature to have an alternative ( B − L)-preserving scenario a...

  8. [8]

    The energetic excitations with energy E above the gap ( E ≥ ∆TO) contain fractionalized excitations with anyon statistics [24] (that can be neither boson nor fermion statistics)

    The energy spectrum above the TQFT ground state is gapped, with an energy gap size denoted ∆ TO. The energetic excitations with energy E above the gap ( E ≥ ∆TO) contain fractionalized excitations with anyon statistics [24] (that can be neither boson nor fermion statistics)

  9. [9]

    The ground state degeneracy (the number of ground states) of TO / TQFT depends on the spatial topology. The ground states of TO / TQFT exhibit long-range entanglement that cannot be deformed to a trivial gapped vacuum (with a single ground state) via any local quantum unitary transformation. We shall name this scenario topological leptogenesis, due to its...

  10. [10]

    A UV completion of gravitational leptogenesis without νR as this schematic process: LSM gravity gravity Topological Order/ TQFT or CFT . (16) 7

  11. [11]

    Furthermore, without using gravity as an intermediate mediator, there is also the discreteB−L gauge topological force (the Z4,X gauge force) to mediate between the Z4,X-charged quarks and leptons in the SM and the Z4,X- Cheshire-charged extended TO / TQFT link configurations (that stores the Z4,X charge nonlocally in the link in the Cheshire-charge way): ...

  12. [12]

    spontaneous symmetry breaking

    Different low-energy physics at IR: This scenario cannot generate the dimension-5 Weinberg operator, because that operator breaks the continuous and discrete X symmetry (U(1) X and Z4,X) explicitly. Also the TQFT / TO have fundamentally different properties than the defects studied in [29, 30]. The three scenarios studied here are general and universal in...

  13. [13]

    Violation of CP Invariance, C asymmetry, and baryon asymmetry of the universe,

    A. D. Sakharov, “Violation of CP Invariance, C asymmetry, and baryon asymmetry of the universe,” Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 5, 32–35 (1967)

  14. [14]

    Baryogenesis Without Grand Unification,

    M. Fukugita and T. Yanagida, “Baryogenesis Without Grand Unification,” Phys. Lett. B 174, 45–47 (1986)

  15. [15]

    Leptogenesis

    Sacha Davidson, Enrico Nardi, and Yosef Nir, “Leptogenesis,” Phys. Rept. 466, 105–177 (2008), arXiv:0802.2962 [hep-ph]

  16. [16]

    A saddle-point solution in the weinberg-salam theory,

    F. R. Klinkhamer and N. S. Manton, “A saddle-point solution in the weinberg-salam theory,” Phys. Rev. D 30, 2212–2220 (1984)

  17. [17]

    On the Anomalous Electroweak Baryon Number Nonconservation in the Early Universe,

    V. A. Kuzmin, V. A. Rubakov, and M. E. Shaposhnikov, “On the Anomalous Electroweak Baryon Number Nonconservation in the Early Universe,” Phys. Lett. B 155, 36 (1985)

  18. [18]

    Axial vector vertex in spinor electrodynamics,

    Stephen L. Adler, “Axial vector vertex in spinor electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. 177, 2426–2438 (1969)

  19. [19]

    A PCAC puzzle: π0 → γγ in the σ model,

    J. S. Bell and R. Jackiw, “A PCAC puzzle: π0 → γγ in the σ model,” Nuovo Cim. A60, 47–61 (1969)

  20. [20]

    Symmetry Breaking Through Bell-Jackiw Anomalies,

    Gerard ’t Hooft, “Symmetry Breaking Through Bell-Jackiw Anomalies,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 8–11 (1976)

  21. [21]

    Pseudoparticle Solutions of the Yang-Mills Equations,

    A.A. Belavin, Alexander M. Polyakov, A.S. Schwartz, and Yu.S. Tyupkin, “Pseudoparticle Solutions of the Yang-Mills Equations,” Phys. Lett. B 59, 85–87 (1975)

  22. [22]

    Leptogenesis from Gravity Waves in Models of Inflation

    Stephon Haigh-Solom Alexander, Michael E. Peskin, and Mohammad M. Sheikh-Jabbari, “Leptogenesis from gravity waves in models of inflation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 081301 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0403069

  23. [23]

    Gravitational Leptogenesis, Reheating, and Models of Neutrino Mass

    Peter Adshead, Andrew J. Long, and Evangelos I. Sfakianakis, “Gravitational Leptogenesis, Reheating, and Models of Neutrino Mass,” Phys. Rev. D 97, 043511 (2018), arXiv:1711.04800 [hep-ph]

  24. [24]

    Quantum Gravity and World Topology,

    Tohru Eguchi and Peter G. O. Freund, “Quantum Gravity and World Topology,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 1251 (1976)

  25. [25]

    Gravitational Anomalies,

    Luis Alvarez-Gaume and Edward Witten, “Gravitational Anomalies,” Nucl. Phys. B234, 269 (1984), [,269(1983)]

  26. [26]

    Categorical Symmetry of the Standard Model from Gravitational Anomaly,

    Pavel Putrov and Juven Wang, “Categorical Symmetry of the Standard Model from Gravitational Anomaly,” Phys. Rev. D 110, 125028 (2024), arXiv:2302.14862 [hep-th]

  27. [27]

    Anomaly and Cobordism Constraints Beyond the Standard Model: Topological Force,

    Juven Wang, “Anomaly and Cobordism Constraints Beyond the Standard Model: Topological Force,” (2020), arXiv:2006.16996 [hep-th]

  28. [28]

    Anomaly and Cobordism Constraints Beyond Grand Unification: Energy Hierarchy,

    Juven Wang, “Anomaly and Cobordism Constraints Beyond Grand Unification: Energy Hierarchy,” (2020), arXiv:2008.06499 [hep-th]

  29. [29]

    Ultra Unification: Unified model beyond grand unification,

    Juven Wang, “Ultra Unification: Unified model beyond grand unification,” Phys. Rev. D 103, 105024 (2021), arXiv:2012.15860 [hep-th]

  30. [30]

    (3+1)d boundary topological order of (4+1)d fermionic SPT state,

    Meng Cheng, Juven Wang, and Xinping Yang, “(3+1)d boundary topological order of (4+1)d fermionic SPT state,” (2024), arXiv:2411.05786 [cond-mat.str-el]

  31. [31]

    Characteristic forms and geometric invariants,

    Shiin-Shen Chern and James Simons, “Characteristic forms and geometric invariants,” Annals Math. 99, 48–69 (1974)

  32. [32]

    The Partition Function of Degenerate Quadratic Functional and Ray-Singer Invariants,

    Albert S. Schwarz, “The Partition Function of Degenerate Quadratic Functional and Ray-Singer Invariants,” Lett. Math. Phys. 2, 247–252 (1978)

  33. [33]

    Quantum Field Theory and the Jones Polynomial,

    Edward Witten, “Quantum Field Theory and the Jones Polynomial,” Commun. Math. Phys. 121, 351–399 (1989)

  34. [34]

    Zoo of quantum-topological phases of matter

    Xiao-Gang Wen, “Zoo of quantum-topological phases of matter,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 041004 (2017), arXiv:1610.03911 [cond-mat.str-el]

  35. [35]

    Quantum Mechanics of Fractional Spin Particles,

    Frank Wilczek, “Quantum Mechanics of Fractional Spin Particles,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 957–959 (1982)

  36. [36]

    Frank Wilczek, ed., Fractional statistics and anyon superconductivity (1990)

  37. [37]

    Anomalies and Fermion Zero Modes on Strings and Domain Walls,

    Curtis G. Callan, Jr. and Jeffrey A. Harvey, “Anomalies and Fermion Zero Modes on Strings and Domain Walls,” Nucl. Phys. B250, 427–436 (1985)

  38. [38]

    Cobordism and deformation class of the standard model,

    Juven Wang, Zheyan Wan, and Yi-Zhuang You, “Cobordism and deformation class of the standard model,” Phys. Rev. D 106, L041701 (2022), arXiv:2112.14765 [hep-th]

  39. [39]

    Proton stability: From the standard model to beyond grand unification,

    Juven Wang, Zheyan Wan, and Yi-Zhuang You, “Proton stability: From the standard model to beyond grand unification,” Phys. Rev. D 106, 025016 (2022), arXiv:2204.08393 [hep-ph]

  40. [40]

    Line Operators in the Standard Model

    David Tong, “Line Operators in the Standard Model,” JHEP 07, 104 (2017), arXiv:1705.01853 [hep-th]

  41. [41]

    Small neutrino masses from gravitational $\theta$-term

    Gia Dvali and Lena Funcke, “Small neutrino masses from gravitational θ-term,” Phys. Rev. D 93, 113002 (2016), arXiv:1602.03191 [hep-ph]

  42. [42]

    Time- and Space-Varying Neutrino Mass Matrix from Soft Topological Defects,

    Gia Dvali, Lena Funcke, and Tanmay Vachaspati, “Time- and Space-Varying Neutrino Mass Matrix from Soft Topological Defects,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 091601 (2023), arXiv:2112.02107 [hep-ph]

  43. [43]

    Cobordism Classes and the Swampland,

    Jacob McNamara and Cumrun Vafa, “Cobordism Classes and the Swampland,” (2019), arXiv:1909.10355 [hep-th]

  44. [44]

    Operator Analysis of Nucleon Decay,

    Frank Wilczek and A. Zee, “Operator Analysis of Nucleon Decay,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 1571–1573 (1979)

  45. [45]

    Conservation or Violation of B-L in Proton Decay,

    Frank Wilczek and A. Zee, “Conservation or Violation of B-L in Proton Decay,” Phys. Lett. B 88, 311–314 (1979)

  46. [46]

    Why are fractional charges of orientifolds compatible with Dirac quantization?

    Yuji Tachikawa and Kazuya Yonekura, “Why are fractional charges of orientifolds compatible with Dirac quantization?” arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1805.02772 (2018), arXiv:1805.02772 [hep-th]. 10

  47. [47]

    Dai-Freed anomalies in particle physics,

    Inaki Garcia-Etxebarria and Miguel Montero, “Dai-Freed anomalies in particle physics,” JHEP 08, 003 (2019), arXiv:1808.00009 [hep-th]

  48. [48]

    Discrete gauge anomalies revisited

    Chang-Tse Hsieh, “Discrete gauge anomalies revisited,” (2018), arXiv:1808.02881 [hep-th]

  49. [49]

    Fermionic Finite-Group Gauge Theories and Interacting Symmetric/Crystalline Orders via Cobordisms,

    Meng Guo, Kantaro Ohmori, Pavel Putrov, Zheyan Wan, and Juven Wang, “Fermionic Finite-Group Gauge Theories and Interacting Symmetric/Crystalline Orders via Cobordisms,” Commun. Math. Phys. 376, 1073 (2020), arXiv:1812.11959 [hep-th]

  50. [50]

    Beyond Standard Models and Grand Unifications: Anomalies, Topological Terms, and Dynamical Constraints via Cobordisms,

    Zheyan Wan and Juven Wang, “Beyond Standard Models and Grand Unifications: Anomalies, Topological Terms, and Dynamical Constraints via Cobordisms,” JHEP 07, 062 (2020), arXiv:1910.14668 [hep-th]

  51. [51]

    Symmetric Gapped Interfaces of SPT and SET States: Systematic Constructions

    Juven Wang, Xiao-Gang Wen, and Edward Witten, “Symmetric Gapped Interfaces of SPT and SET States: Systematic Constructions,” Phys. Rev. X8, 031048 (2018), arXiv:1705.06728 [cond-mat.str-el]

  52. [52]

    Untersuchungen ¨ uber quadratische Formen in K¨ orpern der Charakteristik 2, I,

    Cahit Arf, “Untersuchungen ¨ uber quadratische Formen in K¨ orpern der Charakteristik 2, I,” J. Reine Angew. Math.,183, 148–167 (1941)

  53. [53]

    Generalizations of the kervaire invariant,

    Edgar H. Brown, “Generalizations of the kervaire invariant,” Annals of Mathematics 95, 368–383 (1972)

  54. [54]

    Fermionic Symmetry Protected Topological Phases and Cobordisms

    Anton Kapustin, Ryan Thorngren, Alex Turzillo, and Zitao Wang, “Fermionic Symmetry Protected Topological Phases and Cobordisms,” JHEP 12, 052 (2015), [JHEP12,052(2015)], arXiv:1406.7329 [cond-mat.str-el]

  55. [55]

    Discrete Gauge Symmetry in Continuum Theories,

    Lawrence M. Krauss and Frank Wilczek, “Discrete Gauge Symmetry in Continuum Theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 1221 (1989)

  56. [56]

    Global anomalies in the Standard Model(s) and Beyond,

    Joe Davighi, Ben Gripaios, and Nakarin Lohitsiri, “Global anomalies in the Standard Model(s) and Beyond,” JHEP 07, 232 (2020), arXiv:1910.11277 [hep-th]