Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Visual question answering: from early developments to recent advances -- a survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.03939 v2 pith:QRQR2TJZ submitted 2025-01-07 cs.CV cs.MM

classification cs.CVcs.MM
keywords languagevisualresearchsurveyansweringapplicationscontentevaluation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Visual Question Answering (VQA) is an evolving research field aimed at enabling machines to answer questions about visual content by integrating image and language processing techniques such as feature extraction, object detection, text embedding, natural language understanding, and language generation. With the growth of multimodal data research, VQA has gained significant attention due to its broad applications, including interactive educational tools, medical image diagnosis, customer service, entertainment, and social media captioning. Additionally, VQA plays a vital role in assisting visually impaired individuals by generating descriptive content from images. This survey introduces a taxonomy of VQA architectures, categorizing them based on design choices and key components to facilitate comparative analysis and evaluation. We review major VQA approaches, focusing on deep learning-based methods, and explore the emerging field of Large Visual Language Models (LVLMs) that have demonstrated success in multimodal tasks like VQA. The paper further examines available datasets and evaluation metrics essential for measuring VQA system performance, followed by an exploration of real-world VQA applications. Finally, we highlight ongoing challenges and future directions in VQA research, presenting open questions and potential areas for further development. This survey serves as a comprehensive resource for researchers and practitioners interested in the latest advancements and future

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Spectral Heat Flow for Conservative Token Condensation in Vision-Language Models

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Training-free SpecFlow condenses VLM visual tokens via kNN heat diffusion, adaptive quadtree budgets, and coreset sinks, retaining 95.6% LLaVA-1.5 performance after pruning 88.9% of tokens.

  2. Affordance Benchmark for MLLMs

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new 2,000-question benchmark finds multimodal AI models recognize object affordances far worse than humans, with top model Gemini-2.0-Pro at 18.05% versus 85.34% human best.

  3. Towards Omnidirectional Reasoning with 360-R1: A Dataset, Benchmark, and GRPO-based Method

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    OmniVQA is a first open-source dataset and benchmark for 360-degree visual question answering, and 360-R1 uses GRPO with three LLM-based rewards to improve an existing multimodal model on it.

  4. Exploring the Application of Visual Question Answering (VQA) for Classroom Activity Monitoring

    cs.CV 2025-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Four open-source VQA models reach moderate accuracy on a new classroom video dataset, with yes/no questions easiest and counting/reasoning hardest.

  5. From Reasoning to Generalization: Knowledge-Augmented LLMs for ARC Benchmark

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A staged knowledge-prompting method (KAAR) improves LLM test accuracy on ARC by about 5 absolute points over repeated-sampling plan-guided code generation, reaching 35% with GPT-o3-mini.

Pith tools