pith. sign in

arxiv: 2501.04836 · v3 · submitted 2025-01-08 · ⚛️ physics.optics · cond-mat.mes-hall· cond-mat.mtrl-sci· quant-ph

Photon State Evolution in Arbitrary Time-Varying Media

Artuur Stevens , Christophe Caloz This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 06:10 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sciquant-ph
keywords photon state evolutiontime-varying mediainstantaneous eigenstate methodphoton pair generationBell statespermittivitypermeabilityquantum optics
0
0 comments X

The pith

Instantaneous eigenstate method caps single photon pair generation at 25 percent in time-varying media

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents the instantaneous eigenstate method for tracking quantum photon states in materials with arbitrary time changes in permittivity and permeability. This technique uses the Heisenberg equation to reduce the problem from an infinite system of equations to only two coupled differential equations. With it the authors prove that the highest chance of producing one photon pair from the vacuum state is 25 percent and that Bell states reach at most 84 percent probability. The method also shows how to shape the spectrum of the generated photons simply by choosing the time dependence of the material parameters. These limits and control tools matter for designing quantum light sources that rely on time modulation.

Core claim

The instantaneous eigenstate method allows the computation of the state evolution by solving only two coupled differential equations. Using this approach, the maximum probability of generating a single photon pair from vacuum in such media is 25 percent, while Bell states can be created with a maximum probability of 84 percent. The spectral profile of emitted photons can be precisely controlled through the temporal profiles of permittivity and permeability.

What carries the argument

The instantaneous eigenstate method, which reduces quantum state evolution in time-varying media to two coupled differential equations derived from the Heisenberg equation.

Load-bearing premise

The instantaneous eigenstate method correctly reduces the state evolution to two coupled differential equations via the Heisenberg equation for arbitrary time-varying permittivity and permeability.

What would settle it

A calculation or measurement that produces a single photon pair from vacuum with probability exceeding 25 percent in a time-varying medium would disprove the derived bound.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.04836 by Artuur Stevens, Christophe Caloz.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Emission spectra for a) Gaussian modulated per [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. a), b) Value of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We introduce the instantaneous eigenstate method to study the evolution of quantum states in media with arbitrary time-varying permittivity and permeability. This method leverages the Heisenberg equation to bypass the Schr\"odinger equation, which leads to a complicated infinite set of coupled differential equations. Instead, the method allows the computation of the state evolution by solving only two coupled differential equations. Using this approach, we draw general conclusions about photon statistics in time-varying media. Our findings reveal that the maximum probability of generating a single photon pair from vacuum in such media is 25%, while Bell states can be created with a maximum probability of 84%. Additionally, we demonstrate that the spectral profile of emitted photons can be precisely controlled through the temporal profiles of permittivity and permeability. These results provide deeper insights into photon state manipulation in time-varying media. Furthermore, the instantaneous eigenstate method opens new opportunities to study state evolution in other systems where the Heisenberg equation offers a more tractable solution than the Schr\"odinger equation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces the instantaneous eigenstate method to study photon state evolution in media with arbitrary time-varying permittivity and permeability. It claims that the Heisenberg equation reduces the dynamics to two coupled differential equations (bypassing the infinite hierarchy from the Schrödinger equation), from which general conclusions follow: the maximum probability of generating a single photon pair from vacuum is 25%, Bell states reach a maximum probability of 84%, and the spectral profile of emitted photons can be controlled via the temporal profiles of ε(t) and μ(t). The method is positioned as applicable to other systems where the Heisenberg picture is more tractable.

Significance. If the reduction to two equations holds rigorously for arbitrary ε(t), μ(t) without hidden assumptions, the work would provide a useful analytical framework for quantum state manipulation in dynamic media and yield parameter-free bounds on photon-pair and entanglement probabilities. These bounds, if derived generally, could inform designs for photon sources and entangled-state generation. The approach of closing the Heisenberg dynamics on a minimal set of equations is a potential strength when properly demonstrated.

major comments (2)
  1. [Instantaneous eigenstate method (abstract and § describing the reduction)] The central claim that the instantaneous eigenstate method reduces the Heisenberg dynamics to exactly two coupled differential equations for arbitrary time-varying ε(t) and μ(t) (abstract and method section) is load-bearing for all probability bounds and spectral-control results. The manuscript must explicitly demonstrate that the time-dependent basis introduces no non-adiabatic couplings, preserves commutation relations, and produces no additional source terms; general time-dependent mode expansions in quantized fields typically generate such terms unless spatial uniformity and frequency support are restricted in ways not stated.
  2. [Photon statistics results (abstract and corresponding results section)] The stated maxima of 25% for single-pair generation from vacuum and 84% for Bell states (abstract and results on photon statistics) are presented as general outcomes of the two-equation system. Without the explicit derivation of these bounds from the reduced equations, numerical checks, or error analysis, the figures cannot be verified and rest entirely on the unproven closure of the dynamics.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract asserts precise spectral control through temporal profiles of permittivity and permeability, but no explicit mapping or example equations are referenced; adding a brief illustration would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. We address each major point below and will revise the manuscript to provide the requested explicit demonstrations and derivations.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim that the instantaneous eigenstate method reduces the Heisenberg dynamics to exactly two coupled differential equations for arbitrary time-varying ε(t) and μ(t) (abstract and method section) is load-bearing for all probability bounds and spectral-control results. The manuscript must explicitly demonstrate that the time-dependent basis introduces no non-adiabatic couplings, preserves commutation relations, and produces no additional source terms; general time-dependent mode expansions in quantized fields typically generate such terms unless spatial uniformity and frequency support are restricted in ways not stated.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit demonstration strengthens the manuscript. The reduction relies on spatial homogeneity (explicitly assumed and stated in the paper), under which the instantaneous eigenmodes remain plane-wave solutions with time-dependent frequencies but fixed wavevectors. The Heisenberg equations for the mode operators then close exactly on two coupled ODEs because the Hamiltonian is bilinear; the time-dependent basis change is absorbed into the instantaneous frequency without generating non-adiabatic source terms or violating [a(t),a†(t)]=1. In the revision we will add a dedicated appendix with the full derivation from the quantized Hamiltonian to the two-equation system, confirming the absence of extra couplings. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The stated maxima of 25% for single-pair generation from vacuum and 84% for Bell states (abstract and results on photon statistics) are presented as general outcomes of the two-equation system. Without the explicit derivation of these bounds from the reduced equations, numerical checks, or error analysis, the figures cannot be verified and rest entirely on the unproven closure of the dynamics.

    Authors: The 25% and 84% bounds follow directly from solving the two closed ODEs for the relevant expectation values (or Bogoliubov coefficients) starting from vacuum or Bell-state initial conditions and maximizing over admissible ε(t), μ(t) trajectories. The 1/4 limit arises because the pair amplitude cannot exceed the value permitted by the conserved quantity in the two-equation dynamics. We will include the analytical maximization steps, explicit solutions for representative modulations, and numerical verification in a new subsection of the results. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; new method yields independent probability bounds

full rationale

The paper presents the instantaneous eigenstate method as a novel reduction of the Heisenberg dynamics to two coupled DEs for arbitrary time-varying ε(t), μ(t), explicitly contrasting it with the infinite hierarchy from the Schrödinger picture. The 25% single-pair and 84% Bell-state probabilities are stated as computed outcomes of applying this method to vacuum evolution, not as fitted inputs, self-defined quantities, or results imported via self-citation. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to prior author work or ansatz smuggling; the central claims rest on the method's algebraic closure rather than tautological renaming or parameter fitting. This is the normal case of a self-contained derivation whose validity is an external question of correctness, not circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Central claim rests on the domain assumption that the Heisenberg equation plus instantaneous eigenstates yields an exact two-equation reduction for arbitrary time variation; no free parameters, invented entities, or additional axioms are identified from the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The Heisenberg equation offers a more tractable route than the Schrödinger equation for photon evolution in time-varying media.
    Invoked to justify bypassing the infinite coupled system.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5704 in / 1116 out tokens · 70954 ms · 2026-05-23T06:10:06.045707+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    (12) Since the instantaneous eigenstate must be normalized, ⟨ξ0,0(t)|ξ0,0(t)⟩ = 1, we find that D0,0(t) is determined up to a phase factor θ(t), so that D0,0(t) = eiθ(t)/fk(t)

    that Dn,m(t) satisfy Dn,m(t) = − gk(t) fk(t) n D0,0(t)δn,m. (12) Since the instantaneous eigenstate must be normalized, ⟨ξ0,0(t)|ξ0,0(t)⟩ = 1, we find that D0,0(t) is determined up to a phase factor θ(t), so that D0,0(t) = eiθ(t)/fk(t). Therefore, we conclude that the instantaneous ground state |ξ0,0(t)⟩ is given by |ξ0,0(t)⟩ = eiθ(t) fk(t) X n − gk(t) fk...

    work page

  2. [2]

    W. H. Louisell, A. Yariv, and A. E. Siegman, Quantum Fluctuations and Noise in Parametric Processes. I., Phys- ical Review 124, 1646 (1961)

    work page 1961

  3. [3]

    J. P. Gordon, W. H. Louisell, and L. R. Walker, Quan- tum Fluctuations and Noise in Parametric Processes. II, Physical Review 129, 481 (1963)

    work page 1963

  4. [4]

    J. T. Mendon¸ ca, A. Guerreiro, and A. M. Martins, Quan- tum theory of time refraction, Physical Review A 62, 033805 (2000)

    work page 2000

  5. [5]

    S. A. R. Horsley and J. B. Pendry, Quantum electrody- namics of time-varying gratings, Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences 120, e2302652120 (2023)

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    G. T. Moore, Quantum Theory of the Electromag- netic Field in a Variable-Length One-Dimensional Cavity, Journal of Mathematical Physics 11, 2679 (1970)

    work page 1970

  7. [7]

    J. Hui, S. Qing-Yun, and W. Jian-Sheng, Dynamical casimir effect at finite temperature, Physics Letters A 268, 174 (2000)

    work page 2000

  8. [8]

    V. V. Dodonov, Dynamical Casimir effect: Some theoret- ical aspects, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 161, 012027 (2009)

    work page 2009

  9. [9]

    Rom´ an-Ancheyta, I

    R. Rom´ an-Ancheyta, I. Ramos-Prieto, A. Perez-Leija, K. Busch, and R. d. J. Le´ on-Montiel, Dynamical Casimir effect in stochastic systems: Photon harvesting through noise, Physical Review A 96, 032501 (2017)

    work page 2017

  10. [10]

    S. Ma, H. Miao, Y. Xiang, and S. Zhang, Enhanced Dy- namic Casimir Effect in Temporally and Spatially Mod- ulated Josephson Transmission Line, Laser & Photonics Reviews 13, 1900164 (2019)

    work page 2019

  11. [11]

    Li, Z.-J

    N. Li, Z.-J. Lin, M.-S. Wei, M.-J. Liao, J.-P. Xu, S.-H. Ke, and Y.-P. Yang, Preparation of squeezed light with low average photon number based on dynamic Casimir effect, Chinese Physics B 32, 120301 (2023)

    work page 2023

  12. [12]

    C. M. Wilson, G. Johansson, A. Pourkabirian, M. Simoen, J. R. Johansson, T. Duty, F. Nori, and P. Delsing, Observation of the dynamical Casimir effect in a superconducting circuit, Nature 479, 376 (2011)

    work page 2011

  13. [13]

    Moussa, G

    H. Moussa, G. Xu, S. Yin, E. Galiffi, Y. Ra’di, and A. Al` u, Observation of temporal reflection and broad- band frequency translation at photonic time interfaces, Nature Physics 19, 863 (2023)

    work page 2023

  14. [14]

    T. R. Jones, A. V. Kildishev, M. Segev, and D. Per- oulis, Time-reflection of microwaves by a fast optically- controlled time-boundary, Nature Communications 15, 6786 (2024)

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    Caspani, R

    L. Caspani, R. Kaipurath, M. Clerici, M. Ferrera, T. Roger, J. Kim, N. Kinsey, M. Pietrzyk, A. Di Falco, V. Shalaev, A. Boltasseva, and D. Faccio, Enhanced Non- linear Refractive Index in ε-Near-Zero Materials, Physi- cal Review Letters 116, 233901 (2016)

    work page 2016

  16. [16]

    Y. Zhou, M. Z. Alam, M. Karimi, J. Upham, O. Reshef, C. Liu, A. E. Willner, and R. W. Boyd, Broadband fre- quency translation through time refraction in an epsilon- near-zero material, Nature Communications 11, 2180 (2020)

    work page 2020

  17. [17]

    J. Bohn, T. S. Luk, S. Horsley, and E. Hendry, Spatiotem- poral refraction of light in an epsilon-near-zero indium tin oxide layer: frequency shifting effects arising from inter- faces, Optica 8, 1532 (2021)

    work page 2021

  18. [18]

    Tirole, S

    R. Tirole, S. Vezzoli, E. Galiffi, I. Robertson, D. Maurice, B. Tilmann, S. A. Maier, J. B. Pendry, and R. Sapienza, Double-slit time diffraction at optical frequencies, Nature Physics 19, 999 (2023)

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    Galiffi, A

    E. Galiffi, A. C. Harwood, S. Vezzoli, R. Tirole, A. Al` u, and R. Sapienza, Optical coherent perfect absorption and amplification in a time-varying medium (2024), arXiv:2410.16426

    work page arXiv 2024

  20. [20]

    Pacheco-Pe˜ na and N

    V. Pacheco-Pe˜ na and N. Engheta, Antireflection tempo- ral coatings, Optica 7, 323 (2020)

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    Liberal, J

    I. Liberal, J. E. V´ azquez-Lozano, and V. Pacheco-Pe˜ na, Quantum Antireflection Temporal Coatings: Quantum State Frequency Shifting and Inhibited Thermal Noise Amplification, Laser & Photonics Reviews 17, 2200720 (2023)

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    Dikopoltsev, Y

    A. Dikopoltsev, Y. Sharabi, M. Lyubarov, Y. Lumer, S. Tsesses, E. Lustig, I. Kaminer, and M. Segev, Light emission by free electrons in photonic time-crystals, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119, e2119705119 (2022)

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    Lyubarov, Y

    M. Lyubarov, Y. Lumer, A. Dikopoltsev, E. Lustig, Y. Sharabi, and M. Segev, Amplified emission and las- ing in photonic time crystals, Science 377, 425 (2022)

    work page 2022

  24. [24]

    Lyubarov, A

    M. Lyubarov, A. Dikopoltsev, O. Segal, Y. Plotnik, and M. Segev, Controlling spontaneous emission through the preparation of a photonic time-crystal, Optics Express 32, 39734 (2024)

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    J. E. V´ azquez-Lozano and I. Liberal, Shaping the quantum vacuum with anisotropic temporal boundaries, Nanophotonics 12, 539 (2023)

    work page 2023

  26. [26]

    Ganfornina-Andrades, J

    A. Ganfornina-Andrades, J. E. V´ azquez-Lozano, and I. Liberal, Quantum vacuum amplification in time- varying media with arbitrary temporal profiles, Physical Review Research 6, 043320 (2024)

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    J. T. Mendon¸ ca, A. M. Martins, and A. Guerreiro, Tem- poral beam splitter and temporal interference, Physical Review A 68, 043801 (2003)

    work page 2003

  28. [28]

    J. T. Mendon¸ ca and A. Guerreiro, Time refraction and the quantum properties of vacuum, Physical Review A 72, 063805 (2005)

    work page 2005

  29. [29]

    M. S. Mirmoosa, T. Set¨ al¨ a, and A. Norrman, Quantum state engineering and photon statistics at electromag- netic time interfaces, Physical Review Research7, 013120 (2025)

    work page 2025

  30. [30]

    Hillery, An introduction to the quantum theory of nonlinear optics, Acta Physica Slovaca 59, 1 (2009)

    M. Hillery, An introduction to the quantum theory of nonlinear optics, Acta Physica Slovaca 59, 1 (2009)

    work page 2009

  31. [31]

    Cohen-Tannoudji, J

    C. Cohen-Tannoudji, J. Dupont-Roc, and G. Grynberg, Photons and Atoms: Introduction to Quantum Electro- dynamics (John Wiley & Sons, 2024)

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    Loudon, The Quantum Theory of Light (OUP Oxford, 2000)

    R. Loudon, The Quantum Theory of Light (OUP Oxford, 2000)

    work page 2000

  33. [33]

    See supplemental material at [url will be inserted by pub- lisher] for detailed derivations

    work page

  34. [34]

    Stevens and C

    A. Stevens and C. Caloz, Photon transitions in arbitrary time-varying metamaterials, in 2024 Eighteenth Interna- tional Congress on Artificial Materials for Novel Wave Phenomena (Metamaterials) (2024) pp. 1–3

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    Morgenthaler, Velocity Modulation of Electromag- netic Waves, IRE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 6, 167 (1958)

    F. Morgenthaler, Velocity Modulation of Electromag- netic Waves, IRE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 6, 167 (1958)

    work page 1958

  36. [36]

    Caloz and Z.-L

    C. Caloz and Z.-L. Deck-Leger, Spacetime metamateri- als—Part II: Theory and applications, IEEE Transac- tions on Antennas and Propagation 68, 1583 (2019)

    work page 2019

  37. [37]

    T. T. Koutserimpas and R. Fleury, Electromagnetic Fields in a Time-Varying Medium: Exceptional Points 7 and Operator Symmetries, IEEE Transactions on Anten- nas and Propagation 68, 6717 (2020)

    work page 2020

  38. [38]

    Ortega-Gomez, M

    A. Ortega-Gomez, M. Lobet, J. E. V´ azquez-Lozano, and I. Liberal, Tutorial on the conservation of momentum in photonic time-varying media [Invited], Optical Materials Express 13, 1598 (2023)

    work page 2023

  39. [39]

    Galiffi, R

    E. Galiffi, R. Tirole, S. Yin, H. Li, S. Vezzoli, P. A. Huidobro, M. G. Silveirinha, R. Sapienza, A. Al` u, and J. B. Pendry, Photonics of time-varying media, Advanced Photonics 4, 014002 (2022)

    work page 2022

  40. [40]

    R. W. Boyd, Nonlinear Optics (3rd Edition), 2nd ed. (El- sevier, Chantilly, 2008)

    work page 2008

  41. [41]

    M. O. Scully and M. S. Zubairy, Quantum Optics (Cam- bridge University Press, 1997)

    work page 1997

  42. [42]

    F. J. Dyson, The S Matrix in Quantum Electrodynamics, Physical Review 75, 1736 (1949)

    work page 1949

  43. [43]

    J. J. Sakurai and J. Napolitano, Modern Quantum Me- chanics (Cambridge University Press, 2020)

    work page 2020

  44. [44]

    Bennemann and J

    K.-H. Bennemann and J. B. Ketterson, Superconductiv- ity: Volume 1: Conventional and Unconventional Super- conductors Volume 2: Novel Superconductors (Springer Science & Business Media, 2008)

    work page 2008

  45. [45]

    Bermudez and U

    D. Bermudez and U. Leonhardt, Hawking spectrum for a fiber-optical analog of the event horizon, Physical Review A 93, 053820 (2016)

    work page 2016

  46. [46]

    Sloan, N

    J. Sloan, N. Rivera, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljaˇ ci´ c, Casimir Light in Dispersive Nanophotonics, Physical Re- view Letters 127, 053603 (2021)

    work page 2021

  47. [47]

    Sloan, N

    J. Sloan, N. Rivera, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljacic, Optical Properties of Dispersive Time-Dependent Mate- rials, ACS Photonics 11, 950 (2024)

    work page 2024

  48. [48]

    S. A. R. Horsley and R. K. Baker, Macroscopic QED and noise currents in time-varying media, Physical Review A 111, 053511 (2025)

    work page 2025

  49. [49]

    T. T. Koutserimpas and F. Monticone, Time-varying me- dia, dispersion, and the principle of causality [Invited], Optical Materials Express 14, 1222 (2024)

    work page 2024

  50. [50]

    Goldstein, C

    H. Goldstein, C. Poole, J. Safko, and S. R. Addison, Clas- sical Mechanics, 3rd ed., American Journal of Physics70, 782 (2002). 8 SUPPLEMENT AR Y MA TERIAL

    work page 2002

  51. [51]

    (4)] The Hamiltonian of a system is the operator that leads to the appropriate equations of motion

    TIME-DEPENDENT HAMIL TONIAN [EQ. (4)] The Hamiltonian of a system is the operator that leads to the appropriate equations of motion. In a system with time- varying permittivity and permeability, the equations of motion are the Maxwell’s equations, which may be writtenas ϵ(t)∇ · E = 0, ∇ × E = − ∂B ∂t , ∇ · B = 0, ∇ × B = µ(t) ∂D ∂t . (S1) However, if we u...

    work page

  52. [52]

    (5)] We consider the photon state evolution in a single forward mode ( k, λ) and related backward mode ( −k, λ)

    SCHR ¨ODINGER EQUA TION [EQ. (5)] We consider the photon state evolution in a single forward mode ( k, λ) and related backward mode ( −k, λ). The state of the photon field is then |ψ(t)⟩ = P n Cn,m(t) |n, m⟩, where |n, m⟩ ≡ | n⟩k,λ |m⟩−k,λ. To determine the evolution of this state, we need to calculate the coefficients Cn,m(t), which are governed by the S...

    work page

  53. [53]

    (13)] In the Heisenberg picture, the evolution of an operator ˆA(0) is given by ˆA(t) = ˆU †(t) ˆA(0) ˆU(t), where ˆU(t) = e−i ˆHt/ℏ is the unitary time-evolution operator

    INST ANT ANEOUS GROUND ST A TE [EQ. (13)] In the Heisenberg picture, the evolution of an operator ˆA(0) is given by ˆA(t) = ˆU †(t) ˆA(0) ˆU(t), where ˆU(t) = e−i ˆHt/ℏ is the unitary time-evolution operator. This unitarity, along with |ξn,m(t)⟩ = ˆU †(t) |n, m⟩, implies ˆA(t) |ξn,m(t)⟩ = ˆU †(t) ˆA(0) |n, m⟩ . (S15) In the case of the number operator ˆnk...

    work page

  54. [54]

    For a temporal step, the permittivity and permeability of the system change instantaneously at t = 0 to ϵ2 and µ2 and then remain fixed

    SOLUTIONS TO HEISENBERG EQUA TIONS FOR TEMPORAL STEP The differential equations ∂tfk(t) = −iαk(t)fk(t) − iβk(t)g∗ k(t), f k(0) = 1, ∂tgk(t) = −iαk(t)gk(t) − iβk(t)f ∗ k (t), g k(0) = 0, (S22) are generally difficult to solve, but they can be analytically solved for temporal step modulations. For a temporal step, the permittivity and permeability of the sy...

    work page

  55. [55]

    (15)] When there are initially no photons present, |ψ(0)⟩ = |0, 0⟩, the state of the system at later times is described by |ψ(t)⟩ =P n,m Cn,m(t) |n, m⟩

    INITIAL V ACUUM ST A TE EVOLUTION [EQ. (15)] When there are initially no photons present, |ψ(0)⟩ = |0, 0⟩, the state of the system at later times is described by |ψ(t)⟩ =P n,m Cn,m(t) |n, m⟩. As explained in the paper, the coefficients Cn,m(t) can be calculated as Cn,m(t) = 1√ n!m! ξ0,0(t) ˆan k,λ(t)ˆam −k,λ(t) 0, 0 (S27) With the time-dependent annihilat...

    work page