Pith. sign in

REVIEW 23 cited by

Can MLLMs Reason in Multimodality? EMMA: An Enhanced MultiModal ReAsoning Benchmark

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.05444 v1 pith:FTAXDLOW submitted 2025-01-09 cs.CV

Can MLLMs Reason in Multimodality? EMMA: An Enhanced MultiModal ReAsoning Benchmark

classification cs.CV
keywords reasoningmultimodalemmamllmsenhancedabilityadvancedbenchmark
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The ability to organically reason over and with both text and images is a pillar of human intelligence, yet the ability of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to perform such multimodal reasoning remains under-explored. Existing benchmarks often emphasize text-dominant reasoning or rely on shallow visual cues, failing to adequately assess integrated visual and textual reasoning. We introduce EMMA (Enhanced MultiModal reAsoning), a benchmark targeting organic multimodal reasoning across mathematics, physics, chemistry, and coding. EMMA tasks demand advanced cross-modal reasoning that cannot be addressed by reasoning independently in each modality, offering an enhanced test suite for MLLMs' reasoning capabilities. Our evaluation of state-of-the-art MLLMs on EMMA reveals significant limitations in handling complex multimodal and multi-step reasoning tasks, even with advanced techniques like Chain-of-Thought prompting and test-time compute scaling underperforming. These findings underscore the need for improved multimodal architectures and training paradigms to close the gap between human and model reasoning in multimodality.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 23 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Reflection Anchors for Propagation-Aware Visual Retention in Long-Chain Multimodal Reasoning

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    RAPO uses an information-theoretic lower bound on visual gain to select high-entropy reflection anchors and optimizes a chain-masked KL surrogate, delivering gains over baselines on reasoning benchmarks across LVLM backbones.

  2. OptiVerse: A Comprehensive Benchmark towards Optimization Problem Solving

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    OptiVerse is a new benchmark spanning neglected optimization domains that shows LLMs suffer sharp accuracy drops on hard problems due to modeling and logic errors, with a Dual-View Auditor Agent proposed to improve pe...

  3. PerceptionBench: Evaluating Atomic Visual Perception in Multimodal Large Language Models

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Frontier MLLMs remain far from mastering atomic visual perception: none reach 60% on a failure-derived, perception-only benchmark of ten capabilities.

  4. From Hallucination to Grounding: Diagnosing Visual Spatial Intelligence via CRISP

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    CRISP diagnoses a systematic perception-reasoning disconnect in VLMs, showing proprietary models have latent reasoning but poor metric estimation while open-source models lack compositional reasoning.

  5. Causal Scaffolding for Physical Reasoning: A Benchmark for Causally-Informed Physical World Understanding in VLMs

    cs.DB 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Introduces CausalPhys benchmark with causal graphs and CRFT fine-tuning to improve VLMs' causal physical reasoning accuracy and interpretability.

  6. AnE: Pushing the Reasoning Frontier of Multimodal LLMs via Anchor Evolution

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    AnE combines Truth Anchor Expansion and Scaffold-Stripping to deliver 10.3% gains on eight multimodal reasoning benchmarks for MLLMs.

  7. Bad Seeing or Bad Thinking? Rewarding Perception for Multimodal Reasoning

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A new RL method called MoCA with Perception Verification rewards perceptual fidelity independently to improve both seeing and thinking in VLMs.

  8. Dual-Cluster Memory Agent: Resolving Multi-Paradigm Ambiguity in Optimization Problem Solving

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    DCM-Agent improves LLM performance on multi-paradigm optimization problems by 11-21% via dual-cluster memory construction and dynamic inference guidance.

  9. SPM-Bench: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Scanning Probe Microscopy

    cs.AI 2026-02 reject novelty 6.0

    A new benchmark of 2,703 automatically generated multimodal questions for scanning probe microscopy, plus a modified F1 metric that penalizes over-selection and labels model 'personalities'.

  10. MentisOculi: Revealing the Limits of Reasoning with Mental Imagery

    cs.AI 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0

    Visual thoughts — latent tokens, interleaved images, or video rollouts — do not currently improve multi-step reasoning over text-only baselines in frontier models.

  11. Learning to Reason under Off-Policy Guidance

    cs.LG 2025-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    LUFFY mixes off-policy reasoning traces into RLVR training via Mixed-Policy GRPO and regularized importance sampling, delivering over 6-point gains on math benchmarks and enabling training of weak models where on-poli...

  12. OpenVLThinker: Complex Vision-Language Reasoning via Iterative SFT-RL Cycles

    cs.CV 2025-03 conditional novelty 6.0

    Iterative SFT-RL cycles enable a 7B LVLM to develop sophisticated visual chain-of-thought reasoning and improve performance on math and general reasoning benchmarks.

  13. ProLaViT: Learning Progressive Latent Visual Thoughts in Structured Latent Space

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.5

    Progressive multi-step latent visual thoughts, endogenously distilled from a model's own encoder on synthetic trajectories and regularized by distance-weighted diversity, improve MLLM visual reasoning accuracy and efficiency.

  14. Reversing the Flow: Generation-to-Understanding Synergy in Large Multimodal Models

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Generation-to-Understanding synergy lets multimodal models create self-generated visual edits as intermediate steps, improving performance on twelve benchmarks while revealing limits in task-aligned self-reflection.

  15. Dual-Cluster Memory Agent: Resolving Multi-Paradigm Ambiguity in Optimization Problem Solving

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    DCM-Agent improves LLM optimization solving by 11–21% on seven benchmarks via dual-cluster memory of Approaches, Checklists, and Pitfalls plus adaptive path switching.

  16. Seed1.8 Model Card: Towards Generalized Real-World Agency

    cs.AI 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Seed1.8 is a new foundation model that adds unified agentic capabilities for search, code execution, and GUI interaction to existing LLM and vision strengths.

  17. AgroCoT: A Chain-of-Thought Benchmark for Evaluating Reasoning in Vision-Language Models for Agriculture

    cs.AI 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    AgroCoT is a new Chain-of-Thought VQA benchmark with 4759 samples to evaluate reasoning capabilities of vision-language models in agriculture.

  18. MiniCPM-V 4.5: Cooking Efficient MLLMs via Architecture, Data, and Training Recipe

    cs.LG 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    An 8B MLLM reaches state-of-the-art efficiency and performance under 30B by combining a unified 3D resampler, joint document-text training, and hybrid RL for reasoning modes.

  19. Towards Reasoning Era: A Survey of Long Chain-of-Thought for Reasoning Large Language Models

    cs.AI 2025-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    The paper unifies perspectives on Long CoT in reasoning LLMs by introducing a taxonomy, detailing characteristics of deep reasoning and reflection, and discussing emergence phenomena and future directions.

  20. Bad Seeing or Bad Thinking? Rewarding Perception for Multimodal Reasoning

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Proposes Modality-Aware Credit Assignment (MoCA) with blindfolded-reasoning proxy to reward perception fidelity separately from reasoning in VLMs.

  21. Seed2.0 Model Card: Towards Intelligence Frontier for Real-World Complexity

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    Seed2.0 model series reports gains in reasoning, visual understanding, search, and reliability on intricate long-horizon tasks via an internal evaluation system.

  22. Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Reasoning: A Comprehensive Survey

    cs.CV 2025-03 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    The paper provides the first comprehensive survey of multimodal chain-of-thought reasoning, including foundational concepts, a taxonomy of methodologies, application analyses, challenges, and future directions.

  23. Position: Multimodal Large Language Models Can Significantly Advance Scientific Reasoning

    cs.CL 2025-02 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    Position paper claims multimodal LLMs can significantly advance scientific reasoning and proposes a four-stage roadmap plus challenges and suggestions.