REVIEW 1 cited by
Can Bayesian Neural Networks Explicitly Model Input Uncertainty?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Inputs to machine learning models can have associated noise or uncertainties, but they are often ignored and not modelled. It is unknown if Bayesian Neural Networks and their approximations are able to consider uncertainty in their inputs. In this paper we build a two input Bayesian Neural Network (mean and standard deviation) and evaluate its capabilities for input uncertainty estimation across different methods like Ensembles, MC-Dropout, and Flipout. Our results indicate that only some uncertainty estimation methods for approximate Bayesian NNs can model input uncertainty, in particular Ensembles and Flipout.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
CNN-Derived Elemental Abundances of LAMOST DR10 Giants: Implications for Galactic Substructures
A CNN transfers APOGEE abundance labels to 1.1 million LAMOST giants, producing a public catalog and a tentative chemical classification of the PG1 and PG2 substructures.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.