Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Predict Confidently, Predict Right: Abstention in Dynamic Graph Learning

Machine Learning · Submitted 14 Jan 2025

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim The results highlight our model's ability to efficiently handle the trade-offs between prediction confidence and coverage, making it a dependable solution for applications requiring high precision in dynamic and uncertain environments.

how it is stated · asserted 0.99 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2501.08397 (version 1)
Pith IDCUEGNDC4, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationCharu Sharma, Himanshu Pal, Jayadratha Gayen, Naresh Manwani. "Predict Confidently, Predict Right: Abstention in Dynamic Graph Learning." arXiv:2501.08397 (2025). https://pith.science/paper/CUEGNDC4
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 8,111 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.95 · states limitation 0.18 · human participants 0.03 · controlled comparison 0.17 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.17 · compares with prior results 0.27 · mentions code or data availability 0.03.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Many real-world systems can be modeled as dynamic graphs, where nodes and edges evolve over time, requiring specialized models to capture their evolving dynamics in risk-sensitive applications effectively. Temporal graph neural networks (GNNs) are one such category of specialized models. For the first time, our approach integrates a reject option strategy within the framework of GNNs for continuous-time dynamic graphs. This allows the model to strategically abstain from making predictions when the uncertainty is high and confidence is low, thus minimizing the risk of critical misclassification and enhancing the results and reliability. We propose a coverage-based abstention prediction model to implement the reject option that maximizes prediction within a specified coverage. It improves the prediction score for link prediction and node classification tasks. Temporal GNNs deal with extremely skewed datasets for the next state prediction or node classification task. In the case of class imbalance, our method can be further tuned to provide a higher weightage to the minority class. Exhaustive experiments are presented on four datasets for dynamic link prediction and two datasets for dynamic node classification tasks. This demonstrates the effectiveness of our approach in improving the reliability and area under the curve (AUC)/ average precision (AP) scores for predictions in dynamic graph scenarios. The results highlight our model's ability to efficiently handle the trade-offs between prediction confidence and coverage, making it a dependable solution for applications requiring high precision in dynamic and uncertain environments.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Many real-world systems can be modeled as dynamic graphs, where nodes and edges evolve over time, requiring specialized models to capture their evolving dynamics in risk-sensitive applications effectively. background 1.00 0.05 0.03 asserted 0.58
s1 Temporal graph neural networks (GNNs) are one such category of specialized models. background 1.00 0.04 0.02 asserted 1.00
s2 For the first time, our approach integrates a reject option strategy within the framework of GNNs for continuous-time dynamic graphs. contribution 0.98 0.93 0.09 asserted 1.00
s3 This allows the model to strategically abstain from making predictions when the uncertainty is high and confidence is low, thus minimizing the risk of critical misclassification and enhancing the results and reliability. method 0.49 0.51 0.26 asserted 0.97
s4 We propose a coverage-based abstention prediction model to implement the reject option that maximizes prediction within a specified coverage. method 0.76 0.92 0.11 asserted 0.99
s5 It improves the prediction score for link prediction and node classification tasks. result 0.98 0.84 0.19 asserted 1.00
s6 Temporal GNNs deal with extremely skewed datasets for the next state prediction or node classification task. background 0.98 0.13 0.03 asserted 1.00
s7 In the case of class imbalance, our method can be further tuned to provide a higher weightage to the minority class. method 0.75 0.46 0.03 hedged possibility 0.79
s8 Exhaustive experiments are presented on four datasets for dynamic link prediction and two datasets for dynamic node classification tasks. method 0.81 0.95 0.04 asserted 0.96
s9 This demonstrates the effectiveness of our approach in improving the reliability and area under the curve (AUC)/ average precision (AP) scores for predictions in dynamic graph scenarios. result 0.89 0.94 0.41 asserted 1.00
s10 The results highlight our model's ability to efficiently handle the trade-offs between prediction confidence and coverage, making it a dependable solution for applications requiring high precision in dynamic and uncertain environments. interpretation 0.98 0.84 0.68 asserted 0.99

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.92.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Many real-world systems can be modeled as dynamic graphs, where nodes and edges evolve over time, requiring specialized models to capture their evolving dynamics in risk-sensitive applications effectively. Temporal graph neural networks (GNNs) are one such category of specialized models. For the first time, our approach integrates a reject option strategy within the framework of GNNs for continuous-time dynamic graphs. This allows the model to strategically abstain from making predictions when the uncertainty is high and confidence is low, thus minimizing the risk of critical misclassification and enhancing the results and reliability. We propose a coverage-based abstention prediction model to implement the reject option that maximizes prediction within a specified coverage. It improves the prediction score for link prediction and node classification tasks. Temporal GNNs deal with extremely skewed datasets for the next state prediction or node classification task. In the case of class imbalance, our method can be further tuned to provide a higher weightage to the minority class. Exhaustive experiments are presented on four datasets for dynamic link prediction and two datasets for dynamic node classification tasks. This demonstrates the effectiveness of our approach in improving the reliability and area under the curve (AUC)/ average precision (AP) scores for predictions in dynamic graph scenarios. The results highlight our model's ability to efficiently handle the trade-offs between prediction confidence and coverage, making it a dependable solution for applications requiring high precision in dynamic and uncertain environments.

Human review
How the literature uses it

1 arXiv paper cite this in 2 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it

Cites it as background 1 paper

What it cites

Cites as background 2 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.