Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 87 references

Understanding Mental Health Content on Social Media and Its Effect Towards Suicidal Ideation

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A review of prior studies finds that machine learning on social media text can identify suicidal ideation with 82–97% precision and 71–94% recall, while noting that real-world deployment still faces data, interpretability, and ethical…

desk verdict A serviceable narrative review undercut by an unsupported precision/recall range that contradicts its own Table I. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.09309 v1 pith:EEGGQ3VJ submitted 2025-01-16 cs.CY cs.AIcs.CL

Mohaiminul Islam Bhuiyan , Nur Shazwani Kamarudin , Nur Hafieza Ismail This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CYcs.AIcs.CL
keywords suicidalideationdetectionsocialmediaanalysismentalhealthtextmachinelearningdeepnaturallanguageprocessingsuicideprevention
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review aims to establish that machine learning, deep learning, and natural language processing applied to social media text can detect signs of suicidal ideation. Drawing on a comparison of prior studies, it reports precision rates of 82–97% and recall rates of 71–94% for models such as SVMs, Random Forests, and neural networks. The paper argues these results make large-scale automated screening technically plausible, while insisting that real deployment still faces limited datasets, poor generalizability, opacity, and unresolved ethical questions.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the comparison table of prior studies, which supplies the performance ranges quoted in the conclusion. Around it the paper builds a taxonomy of methods—lexicon-based emotion analysis, supervised and unsupervised machine learning, deep architectures, feature engineering, and evaluation metrics—and a standard pipeline of data collection, preprocessing, feature extraction, model training, and testing. The taxonomy explains how the reported results are generated, and the table is what lets the paper generalize across platforms and studies.

What would settle it

Train one of the reviewed models on posts from one platform and time period, then test it on posts from a different platform and time period; if precision and recall fall well below the quoted 82–97% and 71–94% ranges, the transferable-screening claim collapses.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that social media posts carry detectable linguistic traces of suicidal ideation, and that modern classifiers—SVMs, Random Forests, CNNs, LSTMs, and transformer models—can separate those traces from ordinary expression with reported precision of 82–97% and recall of 71–94%. It argues that deep learning improves context-aware detection over simpler lexicon and frequency-based approaches, because networks preserve word order and longer context. The same synthesis supports a second claim: this capability is not yet deployment-ready, since datasets are small, English-centric, and often biased, models are hard to interpret, and privacy and duty-of-care questions remain unresolved.

Load-bearing premise

The review assumes that the studies it combines use comparable datasets and metrics, so the quoted performance range predicts how a real screening tool would behave.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the reported precision and recall hold outside the original datasets, social media platforms could screen posts and route flagged accounts to human review.
  • Deep learning models such as LSTMs and transformers would be favored over keyword lexicons for detecting context-dependent distress.
  • Models would need careful handling of class imbalance, since suicidal posts are rare relative to ordinary content.
  • Any real deployment would require consent, privacy, and crisis-response protocols to avoid stigmatizing flagged users.
  • Because most training data is English and US-centric, the method must be revalidated in other languages and demographic groups before broad use.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The quoted performance range likely overstates real-world value, because most of the underlying labels come from forum self-disclosure or platform flags rather than clinical assessment.
  • A useful benchmark the paper does not report would be out-of-distribution testing—training on one platform and time period and testing on another; this would directly measure generalizability.
  • The same text-analysis pipeline could extend to other crisis states such as depression, PTSD, or substance use, which share overlapping linguistic markers with suicidal ideation.
  • The hardest unresolved distinction is between expressing distress and declaring intent; future datasets should label near-term risk separately from general ideation, a distinction none of the surveyed studies cleanly makes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a narrative review of machine learning, deep learning, and natural language processing approaches for detecting suicidal ideation from social media content. It surveys roughly twenty studies, summarizes them in a comparison table (Table I), describes classical and deep learning models with equations, and concludes that such technologies achieve precision rates of 82–97% and recall rates of 71–94%, framing them as life-saving tools if developed responsibly. The paper also discusses challenges such as dataset bias, model interpretability, privacy, and ethical deployment.

Significance. If the surveyed evidence were synthesized rigorously, this review would address an important and timely interdisciplinary question: whether automated text classification can support suicide prevention. The paper collects a broad range of relevant studies and provides a useful taxonomy of methods, including lexicon-based tools, classical classifiers, neural architectures, and transformer-based models. However, the paper does not perform a systematic search, does not assess study quality, and aggregates heterogeneous metrics into a single performance range without justification. Its main quantitative conclusion is therefore not reproducible from the evidence presented. The topic is significant, but the manuscript in its current form does not deliver a defensible synthesis.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section IV (Conclusion)] The claim that 'Key findings demonstrate precision rates of 82-97% and recall rates of 71-94% using models such as SVMs, Random Forests, and neural networks' is not supported by Table I, the only quantitative synthesis in the paper. Several entries in Table I fall outside these bounds: Kholifah et al. [28] reports precision of 50.24% and recall of 70.89%; Rabani et al. [16] reports recall of 98.2%; Fodeh et al. [19] reports sensitivity of 0.912; Zhang et al. [21] reports recall of 94.9%. If the range is intended to summarize a subset of studies, the subset and inclusion criteria are not stated. Without a stated extraction rule or meta-analytic method, the range cannot be reproduced or checked, and the conclusion overstates what the reviewed literature shows. This is a load-bearing issue because the abstract and conclusion use this range to argue for the technology's life-saving potential.
  2. [Section II (Previous Works) and Table I] The review lacks a systematic methodology: there is no description of search databases, search strings, inclusion/exclusion criteria, or quality appraisal. The narrative in Section II is organized by study rather than by evidence level, and Table I mixes studies with different platforms (Twitter, Reddit, Facebook, KNHANES survey data), different tasks (suicidal ideation detection, suicide attempt prediction, depression detection, suicide note identification), and different evaluation metrics (accuracy, F1, AUC, precision, recall, sensitivity). Because these metrics measure different quantities under different class distributions and evaluation protocols, combining them into aggregate ranges is methodologically inappropriate. The manuscript needs at least a clear statement of which studies were included in any quantitative claim and a justification for why their metrics are comparable.
  3. [Table I and Section III.F] Table I reports 'Results' as a mixture of accuracy, F1, AUC, precision, recall, and sensitivity, often with no indication of which class or threshold is being reported (e.g., 'Avg rate: 79%-87%' for Parraga-Alva et al. [14]; 'Strong performance in classification' for Haque et al. [22]). The text in Section III.F lists definitions of metrics but does not apply them consistently to the surveyed studies. This makes it impossible for a reader to determine whether a reported value is a precision, recall, or F1 score, or whether it is a macro-averaged versus micro-averaged figure. The authors should standardize the reported metrics and state extraction rules, or explicitly refrain from reporting aggregate ranges.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Title] The title uses 'It's Effect' in the header on page 342, which should be 'Its Effect'.
  2. [Section III.F.4] The heading 'Evaluation matrices' should be 'Evaluation metrics'. This appears in the text before reference [88].
  3. [Table II] Table II provides a qualitative comparison of traditional ML, deep learning, and NLP, but it does not include any concrete performance values or citations for the claims about accuracy, interpretability, or suitability. Readers cannot verify the comparative claims from this table alone.
  4. [Figure 1] Figure 1 presents a useful taxonomy, but it is never referenced in the body text. Please add a sentence that directs the reader to Figure 1 and explains how the taxonomy maps to the sections in III.F.
  5. [References] References are formatted inconsistently (e.g., some entries include 'doi: 10.1007/s11920-018-0914-y.' as part of the publisher name, and several arXiv or conference papers lack page ranges or venue names). A consistent style per the journal's guidelines is needed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: this is a literature review whose conclusions summarize external studies; the unsupported performance range is an evidence-quality issue, not a circular derivation.

full rationale

The paper is a narrative review, not a derivation or modeling paper. Its central claim—'Key findings demonstrate precision rates of 82-97% and recall rates of 71-94%'—is presented as a synthesis of previously published results, and it is not derived from any quantity defined by the authors. The review's tables and taxonomy summarize external work rather than redefine it in terms of the conclusions. The authors do cite their own earlier works (e.g., Kamarudin et al. [42]-[44], Lim et al. [20], Ibrahim et al. [41]), but these citations are background descriptions of related studies and do not serve as the logical basis for the review's takeaways. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work, and no claim reduces by construction to a previously defined quantity. The skeptic's concern—that the stated precision/recall range is not derivable from Table I and omits contradictory entries—concerns the quality and reproducibility of the evidence synthesis, not circular reasoning. Since circularity requires exhibiting a specific reduction of a claimed result to its own inputs, and no such reduction exists here, the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No fitted parameters or invented entities appear. The review's conclusions rest on the validity of the surveyed literature and the comparability of its reported metrics.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Social media posts contain linguistic and contextual signals of suicidal ideation that machine learning models can learn to recognize.
    This is the foundation of the entire surveyed research area; the review asserts it and cites studies, but provides no independent verification.
  • domain assumption The performance metrics reported in the surveyed papers are accurate, comparable, and measured on representative test sets.
    The conclusion aggregates metrics from studies with different platforms, label definitions, and evaluation protocols into single ranges, which requires this comparability assumption.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Understanding Mental Health Content on Social Media and Its Effect Towards Suicidal Ideation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EEGGQ3VJ

@misc{pith2026250109309,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Understanding Mental Health Content on Social Media and Its Effect Towards Suicidal Ideation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EEGGQ3VJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.09309}
}
read the original abstract

This review underscores the critical need for effective strategies to identify and support individuals with suicidal ideation, exploiting technological innovations in ML and DL to further suicide prevention efforts. The study details the application of these technologies in analyzing vast amounts of unstructured social media data to detect linguistic patterns, keywords, phrases, tones, and contextual cues associated with suicidal thoughts. It explores various ML and DL models like SVMs, CNNs, LSTM, neural networks, and their effectiveness in interpreting complex data patterns and emotional nuances within text data. The review discusses the potential of these technologies to serve as a life-saving tool by identifying at-risk individuals through their digital traces. Furthermore, it evaluates the real-world effectiveness, limitations, and ethical considerations of employing these technologies for suicide prevention, stressing the importance of responsible development and usage. The study aims to fill critical knowledge gaps by analyzing recent studies, methodologies, tools, and techniques in this field. It highlights the importance of synthesizing current literature to inform practical tools and suicide prevention efforts, guiding innovation in reliable, ethical systems for early intervention. This research synthesis evaluates the intersection of technology and mental health, advocating for the ethical and responsible application of ML, DL, and NLP to offer life-saving potential worldwide while addressing challenges like generalizability, biases, privacy, and the need for further research to ensure these technologies do not exacerbate existing inequities and harms.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.09309 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Hierarchical taxonomy of methodologies for detecting suicidal ideation on social media. It's widely used in sentiment analysis, social media monitoring, customer feedback analysis, and other areas of natural language processing (NLP) where understanding emotional content is important [47]. ii) SentiStrength: SentiStrength is a sentiment analysis tool designed to decipher the sentiment strength of texts, particularly… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages

  1. [28]

    Mental Disorder Detection via Social Media Mining using Deep Learning,

    B. Kholifah, I. Syarif, and T. Badriyah, “Mental Disorder Detection via Social Media Mining using Deep Learning,” Ki netik: Game Technology, Information System, Computer Network, Computing, Electronics, and Control, pp. 309 –316, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.22219/kinetik.v5i4.1120

    work page doi:10.22219/kinetik.v5i4.1120 2020

  2. [16]

    Detection of suicidal ideation on Twitter using machine learning & ensemble approaches,

    S. T. Rabani, Q. R. Khan, and A. M. Ud Din Khanday, “Detection of suicidal ideation on Twitter using machine learning & ensemble approaches,” Baghdad Science Journal, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 1328 –1339, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.21123/bsj.2020.17.4.1328

    work page doi:10.21123/bsj.2020.17.4.1328 2020

  3. [19]

    Using machine learning algori thms to detect suicide risk factors on twitter,

    S. Fodeh et al., “Using machine learning algori thms to detect suicide risk factors on twitter,” in IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops, ICDMW, IEEE Computer Society, Nov. 2019, pp. 941–948. doi: 10.1109/ICDMW.2019.00137. (IJACSA) International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, Vol. 15, No. 11, 2024 355 | P a g e ww...

    work page arXiv 2019

  4. [21]

    Automatic identification of suicide notes with a transformer-based deep learning model,

    T. Zhang, A. M. Schoene, and S. Ananiadou, “Automatic identification of suicide notes with a transformer-based deep learning model,” Internet Interv, vol. 25, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100422

    arXiv 2021

  5. [14]

    An Unsupervised Learning Approach for Automatically to Categorize Potential Suicide Messages in Social Media,

    J. Parraga-Alava, R. A. Caicedo, J. M. Gomez, and M. Inostroza -Ponta, “An Unsupervised Learning Approach for Automatically to Categorize Potential Suicide Messages in Social Media,” in Proceedings - International Conference of the Chilean Computer Science Society, SCCC, IEEE Computer Society, Nov. 2019. doi: 10.1109/SCCC49216.2019.8966443

    work page arXiv 2019

  6. [22]

    Deep Learning for Suicide and Depression Identification with Unsupervised Label Correction,

    A. Haque, V. Reddi, and T. Giallanza, “Deep Learning for Suicide and Depression Identification with Unsupervised Label Correction,” Feb. 2021, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2102.09427

    arXiv 2021

  7. [1]

    Epidemiology of suicide and the psychiatric perspective,

    S. Bachmann, “Epidemiology of suicide and the psychiatric perspective,” Jul. 06, 2018, MDPI AG. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15071425

    work page doi:10.3390/ijerph15071425 2018

  8. [2]

    Death Rates Due to Suicide and Homicide Among Persons Aged 10 -24: Unite d States, 2000 -2017 Key findings Data from the National Vital Statistics System

    S. C. Curtin and M. Heron, “Death Rates Due to Suicide and Homicide Among Persons Aged 10 -24: Unite d States, 2000 -2017 Key findings Data from the National Vital Statistics System.” [Online]. Available: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/index.htm

    2000

Show all 87 references
  1. [3]

    Smartphones, Sensors, and Machine Learning to Advance Real-Time Prediction and Interventions for Suicide Prevention: a Review of Current Progress and Next Steps,

    J. Torous et al., “Smartphones, Sensors, and Machine Learning to Advance Real-Time Prediction and Interventions for Suicide Prevention: a Review of Current Progress and Next Steps,” Jul. 01, 2018, Current Medicine Group LLC 1. doi: 10.1007/s11920-018-0914-y

    2018 doi

  2. [4]

    Machine learning in suicide science: Applic ations and ethics,

    K. P. Linthicum, K. M. Schafer, and J. D. Ribeiro, “Machine learning in suicide science: Applic ations and ethics,” Behavioral Sciences & the Law, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 214–222, May 2019, doi: 10.1002/bsl.2392

    2019 doi

  3. [5]

    Leveraging Digital Health and Machine Learning Toward Reducing Suicide - From Panacea to Practical Tool,

    J. Torous and R. Walker, “Leveraging Digital Health and Machine Learning Toward Reducing Suicide - From Panacea to Practical Tool,” Oct. 01, 20 19, American Medical Association. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.1231

    2019

  4. [6]

    Finding the traces of behavioral and cognitive processes in big data and naturally occurring datasets,

    A. Paxton and T. L. Griffiths, “Finding the traces of behavioral and cognitive processes in big data and naturally occurring datasets,” Behav Res Methods, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 1630 –1638, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0874-x

    2017 doi

  5. [7]

    Detection of suicide ideation in social media forums using deep learning,

    M. M. Tadesse, H. Lin, B. Xu, and L. Yang, “Detection of suicide ideation in social media forums using deep learning,” Algorithms, vol. 13, no. 1, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.3390/a13010007

    2020 doi

  6. [8]

    Exploring and learning suicidal ideation connotations on social media with deep learning,

    R. and M. P. and M. P. and S . R. and S. R. Sawhney, “Exploring and learning suicidal ideation connotations on social media with deep learning,” in Proceedings of the 9th workshop on computational approaches to subjectivity, sentiment and social media analysis, Oct. 2018, pp. 167–175

    2018

  7. [9]

    Deep sentiment representation based on CNN and LSTM,

    Q. Huang, R. Chen, X. Zheng, and Z. Dong, “Deep sentiment representation based on CNN and LSTM,” in Proceedings - 2017 International Conference on Green Informatics, ICGI 2017, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., Nov. 2017, pp. 30 –33. doi: 10.1109/ICGI.2017.45

    2017 doi

  8. [10]

    Exploring Interpretable LSTM Neural Networks over Multi -Variable Data,

    T. Guo, T. Lin, and N. Antulov -Fantulin, “Exploring Interpretable LSTM Neural Networks over Multi -Variable Data,” May 2019, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1905.12034

    2019 arXiv

  9. [11]

    A novel LSTM–CNN–grid search-based deep neural network for sentiment analysis,

    I. Priyadarshini and C. Cotton, “A novel LSTM–CNN–grid search-based deep neural network for sentiment analysis,” Journal of Supercomputing, vol. 77, no. 12, pp. 13911 –13932, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11227-021-03838-w

    2021 doi

  10. [12]

    How Should Public Administrations F oster the Ethical Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence? A Review of Proposals for Developing Governance of AI,

    A. Sigfrids, M. Nieminen, J. Leikas, and P. Pikkuaho, “How Should Public Administrations F oster the Ethical Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence? A Review of Proposals for Developing Governance of AI,” Frontiers in Human Dynamics, vol. 4, May 2022, doi: 10.3389/fhum...

    2022

  11. [13]

    Data saves lives,

    P. Scott, K. Emerson, and T. Henderson-Reay, “Data saves lives,” BMJ, p. n1694, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1136/bmj.n1694

    2021 doi

  12. [15]

    Depression and Suicide Analysis Using Machine Learning and NLP,

    P. Jain, K. R. Srinivas, and A. Vichare, “Depression and Suicide Analysis Using Machine Learning and NLP,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, IOP Publishing Ltd, Jan. 2022. doi: 10.1088/1742 - 6596/2161/1/012034

    2022 doi

  13. [17]

    Detection of suicide attempters among suicide ideators using machine learning,

    S. Ryu, H. Lee, D. K. Lee, S. W. Kim, and C. E. Kim, “Detection of suicide attempters among suicide ideators using machine learning,” Psychiatry Investig, vol. 1 6, no. 8, pp. 588 –593, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.30773/pi.2019.06.19

    2019 doi

  14. [18]

    Learning Models for Suicide Prediction from Social Media Posts,

    N. Wang et al., “Learning Models for Suicide Prediction from Social Media Posts,” Apr. 2021, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2105.03315

    2021 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Deep neural networks detect suicide risk from textual facebook posts,

    Y. Ophir, R. Tikochinski, C. S. C. Asterhan, I. Sisso, a nd R. Reichart, “Deep neural networks detect suicide risk from textual facebook posts,” Sci Rep, vol. 10, no. 1, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73917-0

    2020 doi

  16. [24]

    Multi -Task, Multi -Channel, Multi -Input Learning for Mental Illness Detection using Social Media Text,

    P. Buddhitha and D. Inkpen, “Multi -Task, Multi -Channel, Multi -Input Learning for Mental Illness Detection using Social Media Text,” pp. 54– 64, 2019, doi: 10.18653/v1/D19-62

    2019 doi

  17. [25]

    Boamente: A Natural Language Processing -Based Digital Phenotyping Tool for Smart Monitoring of Suicidal Ideation,

    E. J. S. Diniz et al., “Boamente: A Natural Language Processing -Based Digital Phenotyping Tool for Smart Monitoring of Suicidal Ideation,” Healthcare (Switzerland), vol. 10, no. 4, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.3390/healthcare10040698

    2022 doi

  18. [26]

    Detecting and Analyzing Suicidal Ideation on Social Media Using Deep Learning and Machine Learning Models,

    T. H. H. Aldhyani, S. N. Alsubari, A. S. Alshebami, H. Alkahtani, and Z. A. T. Ahmed, “Detecting and Analyzing Suicidal Ideation on Social Media Using Deep Learning and Machine Learning Models,” Int J Environ Res Public Health, vol. 19, no. 19, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912635

    2022 doi

  19. [27]

    An ensemble deep learning technique for detecting suicidal ideation from posts in social media platforms,

    S. Renjith, A. Abraham, S. B. Jyothi, L. Chandran, and J. Thomson, “An ensemble deep learning technique for detecting suicidal ideation from posts in social media platforms,” Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 9564 –9575, ...

    2022 doi

  20. [29]

    Building and Using Personal Knowledge Graph to Improve Suicidal Idea tion Detection on Social Media,

    L. Cao, H. Zhang, and L. Feng, “Building and Using Personal Knowledge Graph to Improve Suicidal Idea tion Detection on Social Media,” IEEE Trans Multimedia, vol. 24, pp. 87 –102, 2022, doi: 10.1109/TMM.2020.3046867

    2022

  21. [30]

    A lexicon-based approach to detecting suicide -related messages on Twitter,

    S. M. Sarsam, H. Al-Samarraie, A. I. Alzahrani, W. Alnumay, and A. P. Smith, “A lexicon-based approach to detecting suicide -related messages on Twitter,” Biomed Signal Process Control, vol. 65, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2020.102355

    2021

  22. [31]

    A machine learning approach predicts future risk to suicidal ideation from social me dia data,

    A. Roy, K. Nikolitch, R. McGinn, S. Jinah, W. Klement, and Z. A. Kaminsky, “A machine learning approach predicts future risk to suicidal ideation from social me dia data,” NPJ Digit Med, vol. 3, no. 1, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-0287-6

    2020 doi

  23. [32]

    A machine learning based depression analysis and suicidal ideation detection system using questionnaires and twitter,

    S. and N. S. P. and D. R. K. and B. U. and M. N. and K. V. Jain, “A machine learning based depression analysis and suicidal ideation detection system using questionnaires and twitter,” in 2019 IEEE students conference on engineering and systems (SCES), IEEE, May 2019, pp. 1–6

    2019

  24. [33]

    Detection of suicidality among opioid users on reddit: Machine learning-based approach,

    H. Yao, S. Rashidian, X. Dong, H. Duanmu, R. N. Rosenthal, and F. Wang, “Detection of suicidality among opioid users on reddit: Machine learning-based approach,” J Med Internet Res, vol. 22, no. 11, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.2196/15293

    2020 doi

  25. [34]

    Digital conversations about suicide among teenagers and adults with epilepsy: A big -data, machine learning analysis,

    T. Falcone et al., “Digital conversations about suicide among teenagers and adults with epilepsy: A big -data, machine learning analysis,” Epilepsia, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 951 –958, May 2020, doi: 10.1111/epi.16507

    2020 doi

  26. [35]

    Exploring temporal suicidal behavior patterns on social media: Insight from Twitter analytics,

    J. Luo, J. Du, C. Tao, H. Xu, and Y. Zhang, “Exploring temporal suicidal behavior patterns on social media: Insight from Twitter analytics,” Health Informatics J, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 738 –752, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1177/1460458219832043

    2020 doi

  27. [36]

    Machine Learning Based Suicide Ideation Prediction for Military Personnel,

    G. M. Lin, M. Nagamine, S. N. Yang, Y. M. Tai, C. Lin, and H. Sato, “Machine Learning Based Suicide Ideation Prediction for Military Personnel,” IEEE J Biomed Health Inform, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 1907 – 1916, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2020.2988393

    1907

  28. [37]

    Proactive suicide prevention online (PSPO): Machine identification and crisis management for Chinese social media users with suicidal thoughts and behaviors,

    X. Liu et al., “Proactive suicide prevention online (PSPO): Machine identification and crisis management for Chinese social media users with suicidal thoughts and behaviors,” J Med Internet Res, vol. 21, no. 5, May 2019, doi: 10.2196/11705

    2019 doi

  29. [38]

    Screening for suicidal ideation with text messages,

    M. L. Tlachac, K. Dixon-Gordon, and E. Rundensteiner, “Screening for suicidal ideation with text messages,” in BHI 2021 - 2021 IEEE EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics, Proceedings, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2021. do...

    2021

  30. [39]

    Suicidal ideation prediction in twitter data using machine learning techniques,

    E. Rajesh Kumar, K. V. S. N. Rama Rao, S. R. Nayak, and R. Chandra, “Suicidal ideation prediction in twitter data using machine learning techniques,” Journal of Interdisciplinary Mathematics, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 117–125, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1080/09720502.2020.1721674

    2020

  31. [40]

    Suicidal Profiles Detection in Twitter,

    A. Mbarek, S. Jamoussi, A. Charfi, and A. Ben Hamadou, “Suicidal Profiles Detection in Twitter,” Scitepress, Feb. 2022, pp. 289 –296. doi: 10.5220/0008167600002366

    2022 doi

  32. [41]

    Identifying PTSD Symptoms Using Machine Learning Techniques on Social Media,

    M. A. Ibrahim, N. H. Ismail, N. S. Kamarudin, N. S. Mohd Nafis, and A. F. A. Nasir, “Identifying PTSD Symptoms Using Machine Learning Techniques on Social Media,” in 8th International Conference on Software Engineering and Computer Systems, ICSECS 2023, Institute of Electrical...

    2023

  33. [42]

    Social Media for Mental Health: Data, Methods, and Findings,

    N. S. Kamarudin, G. Beigi, L. Manikonda, and H. Liu, “Social Media for Mental Health: Data, Methods, and Findings,” 2020, pp. 195 –220. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-41251-7_8

    2020 doi

  34. [43]

    A Study on Mental Health Discussion through Reddit,

    N. S. K amarudin, G. Beigi, and H. Liu, “A Study on Mental Health Discussion through Reddit,” in Proceedings - 2021 International Conference on Software Engineering and Computer Systems and 4th International Conference on Computational Science and Information Management, ICSEC...

    2021

  35. [44]

    A study of reddit-user’s response to rape,

    N. S. and R. V. and B. G. and M. L. and L. H. Kamarudin, “A study of reddit-user’s response to rape,” in 2018 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM), IEEE, Aug. 2018, pp. 591–592

    2018

  36. [45]

    A Transformer Based Approach to Detect Suicidal Ideation Using Pre - Trained Language Models,

    F. Haque, R. U. Nur, S. Al Jahan, Z. Mahmud, and F. M. Shah, “A Transformer Based Approach to Detect Suicidal Ideation Using Pre - Trained Language Models,” in ICCIT 2020 - 23rd International Conference on Computer and Information Technology, Proceedings, Institute of Electric...

    2020

  37. [46]

    Word Affect Intensities,

    S. M. Mohammad, “Word Affect Intensities,” Apr. 2017, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1704.08798

    2017 arXiv

  38. [47]

    Emotion Intensities in Tweets,

    S. M. Mohammad and F. Bravo -Marquez, “Emotion Intensities in Tweets,” Aug. 2017, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1708.03696

    2017 arXiv

  39. [48]

    The Heart and Soul of the Web ? Sentiment Strength Detection in the Social Web with SentiStrength,

    M. Thelwall, “The Heart and Soul of the Web ? Sentiment Strength Detection in the Social Web with SentiStrength,” 2017, pp. 119 –134. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-43639-5_7

    2017 doi

  40. [49]

    SentiStrength -SE: Exploiting domain specificity for improved sentiment analysis in software engineerin g text,

    M. R. Islam and M. F. Zibran, “SentiStrength -SE: Exploiting domain specificity for improved sentiment analysis in software engineerin g text,” Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 145, pp. 125 –146, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.08.030

    2018 doi

  41. [50]

    Spatialities, Social Media and Sentiment Analysis: Exploring the Potential of the Detection Tool Se ntiStrength,

    C. Reithmeier, K. Buschbaum, and D. Kanwischer, “Spatialities, Social Media and Sentiment Analysis: Exploring the Potential of the Detection Tool Se ntiStrength,” GI_Forum, vol. 1, pp. 85 –96, 2018, doi: 10.1553/giscience2018_02_s85

    2018 doi

  42. [51]

    A comprehensive survey on support vector machine classification: Applications, challenges and trends,

    J. Cervantes, F. Garcia -Lamont, L. Rodríguez -Mazahua, and A. Lopez, “A comprehensive survey on support vector machine classification: Applications, challenges and trends,” Neurocomputing, vol. 408, pp. 189–215, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2019.10.118

    2020 doi

  43. [52]

    Problem formulations and solvers in linear SVM: a review,

    V. K. Chauhan, K. Dahiya, and A. Sharma, “Problem formulations and solvers in linear SVM: a review,” Artif Intell Rev, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 803–855, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s10462-018-9614-6

    2019 doi

  44. [53]

    Introduction to Support Vector Machines,

    D. Boswell, “Introduction to Support Vector Machines,” 2002. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:18986102 (IJACSA) International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, Vol. 15, No. 11, 2024 356 | P a g e www.ijacsa.thesai.org

    2002

  45. [54]

    Decision tree methods: applications for classification and prediction,

    Y. Song and Y. Lu, “Decision tree methods: applications for classification and prediction,” Shanghai Arc h Psychiatry, vol. 27, pp. 130–135, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:18242585

    2015

  46. [55]

    A Brief Survey on Random Forest Ensembles in Classification Model,

    A. B. Shaik and S. Srinivasan, “A Brief Survey on Random Forest Ensembles in Classification Model,” 2019, pp. 253 –260. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-2354-6_27

    2019 doi

  47. [56]

    Optimization of Classification Rules and Voting Strategies for Random Forest,

    S. Huang, W. Gu, and S. Chen, “Optimization of Classification Rules and Voting Strategies for Random Forest,” in 2021 IEEE 7th International Conference on Cloud Computing and Intelligent Systems (CCIS), IEEE, Nov. 2021, pp. 381 –387. doi: 10.1109/CCIS53392.2021.9754599

    2021

  48. [57]

    A Review of Splitting Criteria for Decision Tree Induction,

    N. S. Sheth and A. R. Deshpande, “A Review of Splitting Criteria for Decision Tree Induction,” Fuzzy Systems, vol. 7, pp. 1 –4, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:125714163

    2015

  49. [58]

    Statistics review 14: Logistic regression,

    V. Bewick, L. Cheek, and J . Ball, “Statistics review 14: Logistic regression,” Crit Care, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 112, 2005, doi: 10.1186/cc3045

    2005 doi

  50. [59]

    Log Odds and the Interpretation of Logit Models,

    E. C. Norton and B. E. Dowd, “Log Odds and the Interpretation of Logit Models,” Health Serv Res, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 859 –878, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12712

    2018

  51. [60]

    A Brief Review of Nearest Neighbor Algorithm for Learning and Classification,

    K. Taunk, S. De, S. Verma, and A. Swetapadma, “A Brief Review of Nearest Neighbor Algorithm for Learning and Classification,” in 2019 International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Control Systems (ICCS), IEEE, May 2019, pp. 1255–1260. doi: 10.1109/ICCS45141.2019.9065747

    2019

  52. [61]

    An Empirical Study of Distance Metrics for k -Nearest Neighbor Algorithm,

    K. Chomboon, P. Chujai, P. Teerarassammee, K. Kerdprasop, and N. Kerdprasop, “An Empirical Study of Distance Metrics for k -Nearest Neighbor Algorithm,” in The Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Industrial Application Engineering 2015, The Institute of Industri...

    2015 doi

  53. [62]

    The euclidean distance degree,

    J. Draisma, E. Horobeţ, G. Ottaviani, B. Sturmfels, and R. Thomas, “The euclidean distance degree,” in Proceedin gs of the 2014 Symposium on Symbolic-Numeric Computation, New York, NY, USA: ACM, Jul. 2014, pp. 9–16. doi: 10.1145/2631948.2631951

    2014

  54. [63]

    Naive (Bayes) at forty: The independence assumption in information retrieval,

    D. D. Lewis, “Naive (Bayes) at forty: The independence assumption in information retrieval,” 1998, pp. 4–15. doi: 10.1007/BFb0026666

    1998 doi

  55. [64]

    The Application of Bayesian Theorem,

    Y. Zhang, “The Application of Bayesian Theorem,” Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology, vol. 49, pp. 520 –526, May 2023, doi: 10.54097/hset.v49i.8605

    2023 doi

  56. [65]

    Modified k-Means Clustering Algorithm,

    V. R. Patel and R. G. Mehta, “Modified k-Means Clustering Algorithm,” 2011, pp. 307–312. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-25734-6_46

    2011 doi

  57. [66]

    Latent Dirichlet Allocation with topic-in- set knowledge,

    D. Andrzejewski and X. Zhu, “Latent Dirichlet Allocation with topic-in- set knowledge,” in Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2009 Workshop on Semi-Supervised Learning for Natural Language Processing - SemiSupLearn ’09, Mo rristown, NJ, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics...

    2009

  58. [67]

    Basic concepts of artificial neural network (ANN) modeling and its application in pharmaceutical research,

    S. Agatonovic -Kustrin and R. Beresford, “Basic concepts of artificial neural network (ANN) modeling and its application in pharmaceutical research,” J Pharm Biomed Anal, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 717–727, Jun. 2000, doi: 10.1016/S0731-7085(99)00272-1

    doi

  59. [68]

    Artificial Neural Networks,

    C. Grosan and A. Abraham, “Artificial Neural Networks,” 2011, pp. 281–323. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-21004-4_12

    2011 doi

  60. [69]

    Do Convolutional Neural Networks Learn Class Hierarchy?,

    A. Bilal, A. Jourabloo, M. Ye, X. Liu, and L. R en, “Do Convolutional Neural Networks Learn Class Hierarchy?,” IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 152 –162, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2017.2744683

    2018

  61. [70]

    Effective Use of Word Order for Text Categorization with Convolutional Neural Networks,

    R. Johnson and T. Zhang, “Effective Use of Word Order for Text Categorization with Convolutional Neural Networks,” in Proceedings of the 2015 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Stroudsburg, PA...

    2015 doi

  62. [71]

    Sequential Learning of Convolutional Features for Effective Text Classification,

    A. Madasu and V. Anvesh Rao, “Sequential Learning of Convolutional Features for Effective Text Classification,” in Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joi nt Conference on Natural Language Processing ...

    2019 doi

  63. [72]

    Understanding of a convolutional neura l network,

    S. Albawi, T. A. Mohammed, and S. Al -Zawi, “Understanding of a convolutional neura l network,” in 2017 International Conference on Engineering and Technology (ICET), IEEE, Aug. 2017, pp. 1 –6. doi: 10.1109/ICEngTechnol.2017.8308186

    2017

  64. [73]

    A Critical Review of Recurrent Neural Networks for Sequence Learning,

    Z. C. Lipton, “A Critical Review of Recurrent Neural Networks for Sequence Learning,” ArXiv, vol. abs/1506. 00019, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:5837849

    2015

  65. [74]

    Understanding Hidden Memories of Recurrent Neural Networks,

    Y. Ming et al., “Understanding Hidden Memories of Recurrent Neural Networks,” in 2017 IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST), IEEE, Oct. 2017, pp. 13–24. doi: 10.1109/VAST.2017.8585721

    2017

  66. [75]

    Long Short -Term Memory Based Recurrent Neural Network Architectures for Large Vocabulary Speech Recognition,

    H. Sak, A. W. Senior, and F. Beaufays, “Long Short -Term Memory Based Recurrent Neural Network Architectures for Large Vocabulary Speech Recognition,” ArXiv, vol. abs/1402.1128, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:16904319

    2014 arXiv

  67. [76]

    The Performance of LSTM and BiLSTM in Forecasting Time Series,

    S. Siami-Namini, N. Tavakoli, and A. S. Namin, “The Performance of LSTM and BiLSTM in Forecasting Time Series,” in 2019 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), IEEE, Dec. 2019, pp. 3285–3292. doi: 10.1109/BigData47090.2019.9005997

    2019

  68. [77]

    Simplified Self -Attention for Transformer-Based end -to-end Speech Recognition,

    H. Luo, S. Zhang, M. Lei, and L. Xie, “Simplified Self -Attention for Transformer-Based end -to-end Speech Recognition,” in 2021 IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop (SLT), IEEE, Jan. 2021, pp. 75–81. doi: 10.1109/SLT48900.2021.9383581

    2021

  69. [78]

    Overview of the Transformer-based Models for NLP Tasks,

    A. Gillioz, J. Casas, E. Mugellini, and O. A. Khaled, “Overview of the Transformer-based Models for NLP Tasks,” Sep. 2020, pp. 179 –183. doi: 10.15439/2020F20

    2020 doi

  70. [79]

    BOWL: Bag of Word Clusters Text Representation Using Wor d Embeddings,

    W. Rui, K. Xing, and Y. Jia, “BOWL: Bag of Word Clusters Text Representation Using Wor d Embeddings,” 2016, pp. 3 –14. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-47650-6_1

    2016 doi

  71. [80]

    Text Segmentation,

    A. Mikheev, “Text Segmentation,” in The Oxford Handbook of Computational Linguistics 2nd edition, R. Mitkov, Ed., Oxford University Press, 2018. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199573691.013.34

    2018

  72. [81]

    A Comparative Study of Stemming Algorithms,

    A. G. Jivani, “A Comparative Study of Stemming Algorithms,” 2011. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:204091414

    2011

  73. [82]

    Text Mining: Use of TF -IDF to Examine the Relevance of Words to Documents,

    S. Qaiser and R. Ali, “Text Mining: Use of TF -IDF to Examine the Relevance of Words to Documents,” Int J Comput Appl, vo l. 181, no. 1, pp. 25–29, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.5120/ijca2018917395

    2018 doi

  74. [83]

    n-Gram Statistics for Natural Language Understanding and Text Processing,

    C. Y. Suen, “n-Gram Statistics for Natural Language Understanding and Text Processing,” IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell, vol. PAMI -1, no. 2, pp. 164–172, Apr. 1979, doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.1979.4766902

    1979

  75. [84]

    The Distribution of N-Grams,

    L. Egghe, “The Distribution of N-Grams,” Scientometrics, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 237–252, 2000, doi: 10.1023/A:1005634925734

    2000 doi

  76. [85]

    Bias in word embeddings,

    O. Papakyriakopoulos, S. Hegelich, J. C. M. Serrano, and F. Marco, “Bias in word embeddings,” in Proceedings of the 2020 C onference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, New York, NY, USA: ACM, Jan. 2020, pp. 446–457. doi: 10.1145/3351095.3372843

    2020

  77. [86]

    Text Normalization,

    T. Abu-Ain, S. N. H. S. Abdullah, A. Abu, H. Script, K. Bin Omar, and B. Bataineh, “Text Normalization,” 2014. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:207920819

    2014

  78. [87]

    Highly Language - Independent Word Lemmatization Using a Machine -Learning Classifier,

    I. Akhmetov, A. Pak, I. Ualiyeva, and A. Gelbukh, “Highly Language - Independent Word Lemmatization Using a Machine -Learning Classifier,” Computación y Sistemas, vol. 24, no. 3, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.13053/cys-24-3-3775

    2020 doi

  79. [88]

    A comparative study of several classification metrics and their performances on data,

    Jude Chukwura Obi, “A comparative study of several classification metrics and their performances on data,” World Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology and Sciences, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 308 –314, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.30574/wjaets.2023.8.1.0054

    2023 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.