Twistorial chiral algebras in higher dimensions

Iustin Surubaru; Tim Adamo

Twistorial chiral algebras in higher dimensions

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Gravity and gauge theory in $4m$ spacetime dimensions possess infinite-dimensional chiral symmetry algebras, realized as charges in twistor sigma models and acting on hard states by holomorphic collinear limits on an emergent 2-sphere.

desk verdict First real extension of celestial chiral algebras beyond d=4, built on twistor sigma models; the classical charge algebra claim holds up, with the usual semi-classical OPE caveat. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.09627 v2 pith:44NCU54W submitted 2025-01-16 hep-th gr-qcmath-phmath.MP

Tim Adamo , Iustin Surubaru This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-thgr-qcmath-phmath.MP

keywords twistortheorychiralalgebrascelestialholographyhyperkählergeometryhyperholomorphicgaugefieldsloopconformallysoftmodessigmamodels

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to establish that the hyperkähler sector of gravity and the hyperholomorphic sector of gauge theory carry infinite-dimensional chiral symmetry algebras whenever the spacetime dimension is a multiple of four, $d=4m$. The algebras are $L_{\mathrm{ham}}(\mathbb{C}^{2m})$ for gravitational perturbations and $L_{\mathfrak{g}}[\mathbb{C}^{2m}]$ for gauge perturbations, the loop algebras of Hamiltonian vector fields on $\mathbb{C}^{2m}$ and of polynomial maps from $\mathbb{C}^{2m}$ into the gauge Lie algebra $\mathfrak{g}$. They are derived from twistor space, shown to appear as algebras of charges in twistor $\sigma$ models under the semiclassical operator product expansion, and identified with soft symmetry algebras under a holomorphic collinear limit on an emergent $2$-sphere inside the complexified celestial sphere. This extends the self-dual chiral algebra story of four dimensions to every dimension divisible by four, and suggests that MHV-like scattering formulae may exist in higher dimensions.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is twistor space $\mathcal{PT} = \mathbb{P}^{2m+1}\setminus\mathbb{P}^{2m-1}$, fibered over a Riemann sphere $\mathbb{P}^1$ with $\mathbb{C}^{2m}$ fibres carrying a weighted holomorphic Poisson structure $\mathcal{I} = \varepsilon^{\dot\alpha\dot\beta}\,\partial_{\mu^{\dot\alpha}}\wedge\partial_{\mu^{\dot\beta}}$. Points of $\mathbb{C}^{4m}$ correspond to holomorphic sections $\mu^{\dot\alpha}=x^{\alpha\dot\alpha}\lambda_\alpha$, the twistor lines. Three linked mechanisms carry the argument: the hyperkähler and hyperholomorphic twistor correspondences, which turn sectors of field configurations into deformations of holomorphic structures on $\mathcal{PT}$; the twistor $\sigma$ models, whose semiclassical OPE converts the twistor Poisson or Lie bracket into the charge algebra of the sector; and the simple-momentum kinematics $k=\omega z_\alpha\tilde z_{\dot\alpha}$, which put the collinear limit on the $\mathbb{P}^1$ factor and make the algebra act on hard wavefunctions through $1/(z-z')$ poles.

What would settle it

Compute the double-contraction term in the OPE of two charges $Q_g$ or $Q_a$ in the twistor $\sigma$ models of Section 4. In the gauge-theory case, look for a double pole proportional to $\langle\lambda\lambda'\rangle^{-2}$ in the current OPE (4.23): a nonzero coefficient is a central term absent from the semiclassical computation, which would break the identification with $L_{\mathfrak{g}}[\mathbb{C}^{2m}]$. A vanishing result would confirm that the semiclassical algebra is exact.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that classical integrability is enough to produce celestial chiral algebras in $d=4m$ dimensions, not only in $d=4$. Around flat space, infinitesimal deformations preserving the hyperkähler condition correspond on twistor space to Hamiltonian functions $g(Z)$ of weight two, and their modes $g[p;r] = (\mu^{\dot 1})^{p_1}\cdots(\mu^{\dot{2m}})^{p_{2m}}/(\lambda_0^{P-2-r}\lambda_1^r)$ close into the loop algebra $L_{\mathrm{ham}}(\mathbb{C}^{2m})$ under the twistor Poisson bracket. Infinitesimal deformations preserving the hyperholomorphic condition correspond to endomorphism-valued functions $a(Z)$ of weight zero, whose modes close into the loop algebra $L_{\mathfrak{g}}[\mathbb{C}^{2m}]$ under the gauge Lie bracket. In the twistor $\sigma$ models, these modes are realized as charges, and the semiclassical (single-contraction) OPE gives $[Q_g,Q_{g'}] = Q_{\{g,g'\}}$ and $[Q_a,Q_{a'}] = Q_{[a,a']}$. Because every hyperkähler graviton or hyperholomorphic gluon has simple momentum $k_{\alpha\dot\alpha} = \omega\, z_\alpha \tilde z_{\dot\alpha}$, the on-shell kinematics reduce to $\mathbb{P}^1\times\mathbb{P}^{2m-1}$ inside the complexified celestial sphere; the conformally soft towers have poles at the usual integer dimensions, and the charges act on hard conformal primary states through the $1/(z-z')$ singularity of a holomorphic collinear limit. When $m=1$, everything reduces to the known four-dimensional chiral algebras $L_{\mathrm{ham}}(\mathbb{C}^2)$ and $L_{\mathfrak{g}}[\mathbb{C}^2]$.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that the semiclassical (single-contraction) operator product expansion of the twistor $\sigma$ model computes the full symmetry algebra of the hyperkähler and hyperholomorphic sectors; if higher-order contractions contribute, the algebra could differ from $L_{\mathrm{ham}}(\mathbb{C}^{2m})$ or $L_{\mathfrak{g}}[\mathbb{C}^{2m}]$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Every spacetime dimension $d=4m$ has integrable sectors of gravity and gauge theory with infinite-dimensional chiral symmetry algebras, so chiral symmetry is not an exclusive feature of four dimensions.
The chiral algebras act on hard hyperkähler gravitons and hyperholomorphic gluons through holomorphic collinear limits, giving a higher-dimensional analogue of the celestial OPE on an emergent $2$-sphere.
The modes of conformally soft hyperkähler gravitons and hyperholomorphic gluons are organized by $L_{\mathrm{ham}}(\mathbb{C}^{2m})$ and $L_{\mathfrak{g}}[\mathbb{C}^{2m}]$, making the soft symmetry algebras of these sectors infinite-dimensional.
When $m=1$, both constructions reduce to the known four-dimensional self-dual chiral algebras $L_{\mathrm{ham}}(\mathbb{C}^2)$ and $L_{\mathfrak{g}}[\mathbb{C}^2]$.
The paper expects this structure to support MHV-like scattering formulae in $4m$ dimensions, with two non-HK/HH external legs and an arbitrary number of HK/HH legs, generalizing the Parke-Taylor and Hodges formulae.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the semiclassical charge algebra is exact, the emergent $\mathbb{P}^1$ inside the complexified celestial sphere is the natural two-dimensional screen for the soft data of these sectors, and a full holographic dual would live on that sphere rather than on $\mathbb{S}^{4m-2}$.
The kinematic constraint that HK/HH momenta be simple is plausibly the mechanism that protects these algebras from the finite-dimensional soft symmetry algebras found for generic momenta in $d>4$; examining how the algebra degenerates as $m$ grows would test this.
A direct extension would be to compute the double-contraction (quantum) correction to the twistor sigma model OPE: if it vanishes, the chiral algebras are exact symmetries; if not, they are only semiclassical and may acquire a central extension.
The same twistor-space logic might apply to other integrable or partially integrable sectors in $4m$ dimensions, such as supersymmetric or higher-spin extensions, with the gauge Lie algebra $\mathfrak{g}$ replaced by a larger symmetry algebra.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Colleague, this paper deserves a serious referee. It gives the first construction of celestial chiral algebras in dimensions d=4m, for the hyperkähler sector of gravity and the hyperholomorphic sector of gauge theory. The algebras are Lham(C2m) and Lg[C2m], defined on an emergent P1 in twistor space, and they act on hard states through a holomorphic collinear limit. That is a genuinely new result, and the authors are careful to distinguish it from the known finite-dimensional soft symmetry algebras in d>4. The main structural claims are supported by standard twistor theory: Theorems 1 and 2 are quoted correctly, and the mode expansions follow from the geometry rather than from fitting.

What the paper does well: it connects three separate strands — twistor constructions of HK/HH sectors, twistor sigma models, and celestial holography — and shows they carry the same infinite-dimensional algebra. The derivations in Sections 3 and 4 are clear; the charge algebra calculation from the semi-classical OPE is explicitly labeled as such. Section 5 does the real work: restricting kinematics to simple null momenta, which is forced by the HH/HK equations, and then showing the conformally soft modes organize into the algebra and act on hard wavefunctions with a 1/(z-z') pole. The m=1 reduction to known 4d results is a good sanity check.

The soft spots are minor and mostly acknowledged. First, the semi-classical OPE in (4.11) and (4.24) keeps only single contractions. If higher Wick contractions contribute, the algebra could acquire central terms (e.g., a Kac-Moody level for Lg[C2m]) or quantum corrections. The authors state this is the classical limit, which is fine; it matches the tree-level notion of a chiral algebra in 4d. Second, the step from (5.8) to (5.9) is compressed: it assumes the polarization factor cannot vanish, but the conclusion about simple momenta is right. Third, eq. (5.34) is a long calculation summarized without a full derivation; the final formula reduces correctly when m=1, so I am not worried.

I have no load-bearing objection. The paper is self-contained enough for a referee to verify the main steps, and the few pulled punches are flagged honestly. It should go to peer review. I would cite it, and it belongs in a reading group.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper proposes that the integrable hyperkähler (HK) sector of gravity and the hyperholomorphic (HH) sector of gauge theory in 4m-dimensional spacetime carry infinite-dimensional chiral symmetry algebras. Around flat space, infinitesimal HK/HH deformations are shown to organize into the loop algebras Lham(C^{2m}) and Lg[C^{2m}], using the twistor-space descriptions of these sectors. The paper then realizes these algebras as charges in twistor sigma models, computes their semi-classical OPEs, and shows that conformally soft HK/HH wavefunctions expand in the corresponding modes. Finally, it establishes that HK/HH kinematics force simple null momenta parametrized by P^1 × P^{2m-1}, so a holomorphic collinear limit on the emergent P^1 gives a celestial OPE action of these algebras on hard states, reducing to known 4d results when m=1.

Significance. If correct, this is the first construction of celestial chiral algebras in spacetime dimensions greater than four, and it identifies an emergent two-sphere inside the higher-dimensional celestial sphere. The paper is careful and systematic: the mode expansions are derived from the twistor geometry, the resulting brackets are computed explicitly, and the m=1 reduction is checked against known formulas. The main limitation is explicit: the charge algebra in Section 4 is obtained in the semi-classical single-contraction approximation, so the paper's statement is about the classical/tree-level symmetry algebra. Within that scope, the construction is coherent and opens a concrete route to MHV-like amplitude formulae in 4m dimensions.

minor comments (5)

[Section 5.1, Eqs. (5.8)–(5.9)] The step from the second condition in (5.8) to (5.9) is too compressed; please spell out the spinor contraction and the argument that the polarization factor cannot vanish, since this is the load-bearing step that forces simple momenta and defines the emergent P^1.
[Section 4, Eqs. (4.11) and (4.24)] The charge algebra is computed with only single Wick contractions. The paper labels this 'semi-classical' in the text, but the abstract and introduction should state explicitly that the chiral algebra statement is at classical/tree level; otherwise a reader may mistakenly infer a full quantum statement.
[Eq. (5.37)] The second term contains 'Γ − 1 − p1 + L)', which appears to be missing the argument Δ; it should presumably read Γ(Δ − 1 − p1 + L) as in Eq. (5.41).
[Eqs. (5.20) and (5.26)] The summation notation 'p ∈ N0' should be 'p ∈ N0^{2m}' with P = |p|; the line breaks in (5.20) are also confusing and should be cleaned up.
[Section 5.2, Eq. (5.17)] The notation ¯δ_Δ(⟨λ z⟩) is used before its definition in (5.18); consider introducing the definition just before (5.17) to avoid a small ordering issue in the exposition.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the higher-dimensional chiral algebras are derived from twistor geometry and sigma-model OPEs, with the only approximation (semi-classical OPE) explicitly stated.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is self-contained. It starts from the established twistor correspondences (Theorems 1 and 2, due to Penrose, Ward, Hitchin et al.) to define symmetry perturbations g(Z) and a(Z), computes their mode algebras in eqs. (3.7) and (3.21), identifies them as Lham(C2m) and Lg[C2m] via the loop parameter lambda, and then independently realizes these algebras as semi-classical charge algebras in twistor sigma models in eqs. (4.13) and (4.26). The OPE computations are direct single-contraction calculations from the free-field OPEs (4.10) and (4.22) and do not assume the target algebra. Section 5's conformally soft expansions, eqs. (5.20) and (5.26), are multinomial-theorem identities applied to the Mellin-transformed wavefunctions; they are basis expansions, not fitted inputs. The subsequent action on hard states, eqs. (5.36) and (5.40), is an honest calculation using the support of holomorphic delta functions, and it reduces to the known 4d formulas only as a limit. The one substantive approximation, the semi-classical single-contraction OPE, is explicitly flagged in the discussion around eq. (4.23); higher Wick contractions are identified as quantum corrections that are not needed for the classical charge algebra claimed. Self-citations [27], [93], and [139] supply techniques and 4d limiting cases, but the higher-dimensional claim does not reduce to them by construction. No step exhibits the pattern of a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, a definition smuggling in the conclusion, or a load-bearing self-citation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no free parameters or invented entities. It relies on established twistor correspondences and standard deformation theory, with the main assumptions being the validity of the twistor descriptions, the completeness of the mode expansions, and the use of semi-classical OPEs to determine the charge algebras.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption Hyperkähler 4m-manifolds correspond to twistor spaces that are complex deformations preserving the holomorphic fibration and Poisson structure (Theorem 1).
The symmetry algebra derivation for gravity in Section 3.1 is based on deformations of this twistor space.
domain assumption Hyperholomorphic bundles correspond to holomorphic vector bundles on twistor space that are trivial on every twistor line (Theorem 2).
The symmetry algebra derivation for gauge theory in Section 3.2 uses this correspondence.
ad hoc to paper The infinitesimal deformations (symmetries) are given by the mode expansions g[p;r] and Sa[p;r] in eqs. (3.4) and (3.19), polynomial in µ and Laurent in λ.
This is a standard assumption in deformation theory, but the paper does not prove that these modes exhaust all deformations; it is load-bearing for identifying the algebra.
domain assumption The semi-classical OPE, keeping only single Wick contractions, determines the algebra of charges.
Used in Section 4 to derive eqs. (4.13) and (4.26); quantum corrections from multiple contractions are neglected by fiat.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Twistorial chiral algebras in higher dimensions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/44NCU54W

@misc{pith2026250109627,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Twistorial chiral algebras in higher dimensions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/44NCU54W}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.09627}
}

abstract

In four spacetime dimensions, the classically integrable self-dual sectors of gauge theory and gravity have associated chiral algebras, which emerge naturally from their description in twistor space. We show that there are similar chiral algebras associated to integrable sectors of gauge theory and gravity whenever the spacetime dimension is an integer multiple of four. In particular, the hyperk\"ahler sector of gravity and the hyperholomorphic sector of gauge theory in $4m$-dimensions have well-known twistor descriptions giving rise to chiral algebras. Using twistor sigma models to describe these sectors, we demonstrate that the chiral algebras in higher-dimensions also arise as soft symmetry algebras under a certain notion of collinear limit. Interestingly, the chiral algebras and collinear limits in higher-dimensions are defined on the 2-sphere, rather than the full celestial sphere.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Celestial Chiral Algebras and Self-Dual Gravity
hep-th 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

This thesis derives deformations of celestial chiral algebras in self-dual gravity on curved backgrounds, obtaining W(infinity) on Eguchi-Hanson space, Ldiff_q(C) under Moyal deformation, and a two-parameter deformati...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

150 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

Pasterski, S.-H

S. Pasterski, S.-H. Shao, and A. Strominger,Flat Space Amplitudes and Conformal Symmetry of the Celestial Sphere, Phys. Rev. D96 (2017), no. 6 065026, [arXiv:1701.00049]

arXiv 2017
[2]

Pasterski and S.-H

S. Pasterski and S.-H. Shao,Conformal basis for flat space amplitudes, Phys. Rev. D96 (2017), no. 6 065022, [arXiv:1705.01027]

arXiv 2017
[3]

Pasterski, S.-H

S. Pasterski, S.-H. Shao, and A. Strominger,Gluon Amplitudes as 2d Conformal Correlators, Phys. Rev. D96 (2017), no. 8 085006, [arXiv:1706.03917]

arXiv 2017
[4]

Raclariu,Lectures on Celestial Holography, arXiv:2107.02075

A.-M. Raclariu,Lectures on Celestial Holography, arXiv:2107.02075

arXiv
[5]

Pasterski,Lectures on celestial amplitudes, Eur

S. Pasterski,Lectures on celestial amplitudes, Eur. Phys. J. C81 (2021), no. 12 1062, [arXiv:2108.04801]

arXiv 2021
[6]

Pasterski, M

S. Pasterski, M. Pate, and A.-M. Raclariu,Celestial Holography, inSnowmass 2021, 11,

2021
[7]

McLoughlin, A

T. McLoughlin, A. Puhm, and A.-M. Raclariu,The SAGEX review on scattering amplitudes chapter 11: soft theorems and celestial amplitudes, J. Phys. A55 (2022), no. 44 443012, [arXiv:2203.13022]

arXiv 2022
[8]

Pasterski,A Chapter on Celestial Holography, arXiv:2310.04932

S. Pasterski,A Chapter on Celestial Holography, arXiv:2310.04932

arXiv

Show all 150 references

[9]

Donnay,Celestial holography: An asymptotic symmetry perspective, Phys

L. Donnay,Celestial holography: An asymptotic symmetry perspective, Phys. Rept. 1073 (2024) 1–41, [arXiv:2310.12922]

2024 arXiv
[10]

Donnay, A

L. Donnay, A. Puhm, and A. Strominger,Conformally Soft Photons and Gravitons, JHEP 01 (2019) 184, [arXiv:1810.05219]

2019 arXiv
[11]

Banerjee, P

S. Banerjee, P. Pandey, and P. Paul,Conformal properties of soft operators: Use of null states, Phys. Rev. D101 (2020), no. 10 106014, [arXiv:1902.02309]

2020 arXiv
[12]

W. Fan, A. Fotopoulos, and T. R. Taylor,Soft Limits of Yang-Mills Amplitudes and Conformal Correlators, JHEP 05 (2019) 121, [arXiv:1903.01676]

2019 arXiv
[13]

Pate, A.-M

M. Pate, A.-M. Raclariu, and A. Strominger,Conformally Soft Theorem in Gauge Theory, Phys. Rev. D100 (2019), no. 8 085017, [arXiv:1904.10831]

2019 arXiv
[14]

Nandan, A

D. Nandan, A. Schreiber, A. Volovich, and M. Zlotnikov,Celestial Amplitudes: Conformal Partial Waves and Soft Limits, JHEP 10 (2019) 018, [arXiv:1904.10940]

2019 arXiv
[15]

Adamo, L

T. Adamo, L. Mason, and A. Sharma,Celestial amplitudes and conformal soft theorems, Class. Quant. Grav.36 (2019), no. 20 205018, [arXiv:1905.09224]

2019 arXiv
[16]

Puhm,Conformally Soft Theorem in Gravity, JHEP 09 (2020) 130, [arXiv:1905.09799]

A. Puhm,Conformally Soft Theorem in Gravity, JHEP 09 (2020) 130, [arXiv:1905.09799]

2020 arXiv
[17]

Guevara,Notes on Conformal Soft Theorems and Recursion Relations in Gravity, arXiv:1906.07810

A. Guevara,Notes on Conformal Soft Theorems and Recursion Relations in Gravity, arXiv:1906.07810

1906 arXiv
[18]

Guevara, E

A. Guevara, E. Himwich, M. Pate, and A. Strominger,Holographic symmetry algebras for gauge theory and gravity, JHEP 11 (2021) 152, [arXiv:2103.03961]

2021 arXiv
[19]

Pate, A.-M

M. Pate, A.-M. Raclariu, A. Strominger, and E. Y. Yuan,Celestial operator products of gluons and gravitons, Rev. Math. Phys.33 (2021), no. 09 2140003, [arXiv:1910.07424]

2021 arXiv
[20]

Strominger, w1+∞ Algebra and the Celestial Sphere: Infinite Towers of Soft Graviton, Photon, and Gluon Symmetries, Phys

A. Strominger, w1+∞ Algebra and the Celestial Sphere: Infinite Towers of Soft Graviton, Photon, and Gluon Symmetries, Phys. Rev. Lett.127 (2021), no. 22 221601, [arXiv:2105.14346]

2021 arXiv
[21]

Hoppe,Diffeomorphism Groups, Quantization and SU(∞), Int

J. Hoppe,Diffeomorphism Groups, Quantization and SU(∞), Int. J. Mod. Phys. A4 (1989) 5235

1989
[22]

Bakas,The Large n Limit of Extended Conformal Symmetries, Phys

I. Bakas,The Large n Limit of Extended Conformal Symmetries, Phys. Lett. B228 (1989) 57

1989
[23]

Bakas,The Structure of theW(infinity) Algebra, Commun

I. Bakas,The Structure of theW(infinity) Algebra, Commun. Math. Phys.134 (1990) 487–508

1990
[24]

Penrose,Twistor algebra, J

R. Penrose,Twistor algebra, J. Math. Phys.8 (1967) 345

1967
[25]

R. S. Ward,On Selfdual gauge fields, Phys. Lett. A61 (1977) 81–82

1977
[26]

Penrose,Nonlinear Gravitons and Curved Twistor Theory, Gen

R. Penrose,Nonlinear Gravitons and Curved Twistor Theory, Gen. Rel. Grav.7 (1976) 31–52

1976
[27]

Adamo, L

T. Adamo, L. Mason, and A. Sharma,Celestial w1+∞ Symmetries from Twistor Space, SIGMA 18 (2022) 016, [arXiv:2110.06066]. – 30 –

2022 arXiv
[28]

C. P. Boyer and J. F. Plebanski,An infinite heirarchy of conservation laws and nonlinear superposition principles for selfdual Einstein spaces, J. Math. Phys.26 (1985) 229–234

1985
[29]

Park,Extended Conformal Symmetries in Real Heavens, Phys

Q.-H. Park,Extended Conformal Symmetries in Real Heavens, Phys. Lett. B236 (1990) 429–432

1990
[30]

Park,Selfdual Gravity as a LargeN Limit of the Two-dimensional Nonlinearσ Model, Phys

Q.-H. Park,Selfdual Gravity as a LargeN Limit of the Two-dimensional Nonlinearσ Model, Phys. Lett. B238 (1990) 287–290

1990
[31]

L. J. Mason,H-space: a universal integrable system?, Twistor Newsletter 30 (1990) 14–17

1990
[32]

Dunajski and L

M. Dunajski and L. J. Mason,HyperKahler hierarchies and their twistor theory, Commun. Math. Phys. 213 (2000) 641–672, [math/0001008]

2000 arXiv
[33]

Himwich, M

E. Himwich, M. Pate, and K. Singh,Celestial operator product expansions and w1+∞ symmetry for all spins, JHEP 01 (2022) 080, [arXiv:2108.07763]

2022 arXiv
[34]

Jiang,Holographic chiral algebra: supersymmetry, infinite Ward identities, and EFTs, JHEP 01 (2022) 113, [arXiv:2108.08799]

H. Jiang,Holographic chiral algebra: supersymmetry, infinite Ward identities, and EFTs, JHEP 01 (2022) 113, [arXiv:2108.08799]

2022 arXiv
[35]

J. Mago, L. Ren, A. Y. Srikant, and A. Volovich,Deformed w1+∞ Algebras in the Celestial CFT, SIGMA 19 (2023) 044, [arXiv:2111.11356]

2023 arXiv
[36]

L. Ren, M. Spradlin, A. Yelleshpur Srikant, and A. Volovich,On effective field theories with celestial duals, JHEP 08 (2022) 251, [arXiv:2206.08322]

2022 arXiv
[37]

Himwich and M

E. Himwich and M. Pate,w1+∞ in 4D gravitational scattering, JHEP 07 (2024) 180, [arXiv:2312.08597]

2024 arXiv
[38]

Agrawal, P

S. Agrawal, P. Charalambous, and L. Donnay,Celestial sw1+∞ algebra in Einstein-Yang-Mills theory, arXiv:2412.01647

arXiv
[39]

Freidel, D

L. Freidel, D. Pranzetti, and A.-M. Raclariu,Sub-subleading soft graviton theorem from asymptotic Einstein’s equations, JHEP 05 (2022) 186, [arXiv:2111.15607]

2022 arXiv
[40]

Freidel, D

L. Freidel, D. Pranzetti, and A.-M. Raclariu,Higher spin dynamics in gravity and w1+∞ celestial symmetries, Phys. Rev. D106 (2022), no. 8 086013, [arXiv:2112.15573]

2022 arXiv
[41]

Freidel, D

L. Freidel, D. Pranzetti, and A.-M. Raclariu,On infinite symmetry algebras in Yang-Mills theory, JHEP 12 (2023) 009, [arXiv:2306.02373]

2023 arXiv
[42]

Mason, R

L. Mason, R. Ruzziconi, and A. Yelleshpur Srikant,Carrollian amplitudes and celestial symmetries, JHEP 05 (2024) 012, [arXiv:2312.10138]

2024 arXiv
[43]

Donnay, L

L. Donnay, L. Freidel, and Y. Herfray,Carrollian L w1+∞ representation from twistor space, SciPost Phys. 17 (2024), no. 4 118, [arXiv:2402.00688]

2024 arXiv
[44]

Geiller,Celestial w1+∞ charges and the subleading structure of asymptotically-flat spacetimes, arXiv:2403.05195

M. Geiller,Celestial w1+∞ charges and the subleading structure of asymptotically-flat spacetimes, arXiv:2403.05195

arXiv
[45]

A. Kmec, L. Mason, R. Ruzziconi, and A. Yelleshpur Srikant,Celestial Lw1+∞ charges from a twistor action, JHEP 10 (2024) 250, [arXiv:2407.04028]

2024 arXiv
[46]

Costello, N

K. Costello, N. M. Paquette, and A. Sharma,Top-Down Holography in an Asymptotically Flat Spacetime, Phys. Rev. Lett.130 (2023), no. 6 061602, [arXiv:2208.14233]

2023 arXiv
[47]

Garner and N

N. Garner and N. M. Paquette,Twistorial monopoles & chiral algebras, JHEP 08 (2023) 088, [arXiv:2305.00049]

2023 arXiv
[48]

Costello, N

K. Costello, N. M. Paquette, and A. Sharma,Burns space and holography, JHEP 10 (2023) 174, [arXiv:2306.00940]. – 31 –

2023 arXiv
[49]

Bittleston, S

R. Bittleston, S. Heuveline, and D. Skinner,The celestial chiral algebra of self-dual gravity on Eguchi-Hanson space, JHEP 09 (2023) 008, [arXiv:2305.09451]

2023 arXiv
[50]

Adamo, W

T. Adamo, W. Bu, and B. Zhu,Infrared structures of scattering on self-dual radiative backgrounds, JHEP 06 (2024) 076, [arXiv:2309.01810]

2024 arXiv
[51]

T. R. Taylor and B. Zhu,w1+∞ Algebra with a Cosmological Constant and the Celestial Sphere, Phys. Rev. Lett.132 (2024), no. 22 221602, [arXiv:2312.00876]

2024 arXiv
[52]

Bittleston, G

R. Bittleston, G. Bogna, S. Heuveline, A. Kmec, L. Mason, and D. Skinner,On AdS4 deformations of celestial symmetries, JHEP 07 (2024) 010, [arXiv:2403.18011]

2024 arXiv
[53]

Adamo, G

T. Adamo, G. Bogna, L. Mason, and A. Sharma,Gluon scattering on the self-dual dyon, arXiv:2406.09165

arXiv
[54]

Bogna and S

G. Bogna and S. Heuveline,Towards celestial chiral algebras of self-dual black holes, arXiv:2408.14324

arXiv
[55]

Monteiro,Celestial chiral algebras, colour-kinematics duality and integrability, JHEP 01 (2023) 092, [arXiv:2208.11179]

R. Monteiro,Celestial chiral algebras, colour-kinematics duality and integrability, JHEP 01 (2023) 092, [arXiv:2208.11179]

2023 arXiv
[56]

W. Bu, S. Heuveline, and D. Skinner,Moyal deformations, W1+∞ and celestial holography, JHEP 12 (2022) 011, [arXiv:2208.13750]

2022 arXiv
[57]

Monteiro,From Moyal deformations to chiral higher-spin theories and to celestial algebras, JHEP 03 (2023) 062, [arXiv:2212.11266]

R. Monteiro,From Moyal deformations to chiral higher-spin theories and to celestial algebras, JHEP 03 (2023) 062, [arXiv:2212.11266]

2023 arXiv
[58]

Ponomarev,Towards higher-spin holography in flat space, JHEP 01 (2023) 084, [arXiv:2210.04035]

D. Ponomarev,Towards higher-spin holography in flat space, JHEP 01 (2023) 084, [arXiv:2210.04035]

2023 arXiv
[59]

Fotopoulos, S

A. Fotopoulos, S. Stieberger, T. R. Taylor, and B. Zhu,Extended Super BMS Algebra of Celestial CFT, JHEP 09 (2020) 198, [arXiv:2007.03785]

2020 arXiv
[60]

Brandhuber, G

A. Brandhuber, G. R. Brown, J. Gowdy, B. Spence, and G. Travaglini,Celestial superamplitudes, Phys. Rev. D104 (2021), no. 4 045016, [arXiv:2105.10263]

2021 arXiv
[61]

Jiang,Celestial superamplitude inN = 4 SYM theory, JHEP 08 (2021) 031, [arXiv:2105.10269]

H. Jiang,Celestial superamplitude inN = 4 SYM theory, JHEP 08 (2021) 031, [arXiv:2105.10269]

2021 arXiv
[62]

Bu,Supersymmetric celestial OPEs and soft algebras from the ambitwistor string worldsheet, Phys

W. Bu,Supersymmetric celestial OPEs and soft algebras from the ambitwistor string worldsheet, Phys. Rev. D105 (2022), no. 12 126029, [arXiv:2111.15584]

2022 arXiv
[63]

Ahn,A deformed supersymmetricw1+∞ symmetry in the celestial conformal field theory, Eur

C. Ahn,A deformed supersymmetricw1+∞ symmetry in the celestial conformal field theory, Eur. Phys. J. C82 (2022), no. 7 630, [arXiv:2202.02949]

2022 arXiv
[64]

Ahn and M

C. Ahn and M. H. Kim,A supersymmetric extension of w1+∞ algebra in the celestial holography, JHEP 09 (2024) 081, [arXiv:2407.05601]

2024 arXiv
[65]

Crawley, A

E. Crawley, A. Strominger, and A. Tropper,Chiral Soft Algebras forN = 2 Gauge Theory, arXiv:2407.16752

arXiv
[66]

Tropper,Symmetries of the Celestial Supersphere, arXiv:2412.13113

A. Tropper,Symmetries of the Celestial Supersphere, arXiv:2412.13113

arXiv
[67]

Adamo, W

T. Adamo, W. Bu, E. Casali, and A. Sharma,All-order celestial OPE in the MHV sector, JHEP 03 (2023) 252, [arXiv:2211.17124]

2023 arXiv
[68]

L. Ren, A. Schreiber, A. Sharma, and D. Wang,All-order celestial OPE from on-shell recursion, JHEP 10 (2023) 080, [arXiv:2305.11851]

2023 arXiv
[69]

Zeng,Twisted Holography and Celestial Holography from Boundary Chiral Algebra, Commun

K. Zeng,Twisted Holography and Celestial Holography from Boundary Chiral Algebra, Commun. Math. Phys.405 (2024), no. 1 19, [arXiv:2302.06693]. – 32 –

2024 arXiv
[70]

Bittleston, K

R. Bittleston, K. Costello, and K. Zeng,Self-Dual Gauge Theory from the Top Down, arXiv:2412.02680

arXiv
[71]

K. J. Costello,Bootstrapping two-loop QCD amplitudes, arXiv:2302.00770

arXiv
[72]

L. J. Dixon and A. Morales,On gauge amplitudes first appearing at two loops, JHEP 08 (2024) 129, [arXiv:2407.13967]

2024 arXiv
[73]

L. J. Dixon and A. Morales,Rational QCD loop amplitudes and quantum theories on twistor space, arXiv:2411.10967

arXiv
[74]

Garner and N

N. Garner and N. M. Paquette,Scattering off of Twistorial Line Defects, arXiv:2408.11092

arXiv
[75]

S. J. Parke and T. R. Taylor,An Amplitude forn Gluon Scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett.56 (1986) 2459

1986
[76]

Hollands and A

S. Hollands and A. Ishibashi,Asymptotic flatness and Bondi energy in higher dimensional gravity, J. Math. Phys.46 (2005) 022503, [gr-qc/0304054]

2005 arXiv
[77]

Tanabe, S

K. Tanabe, S. Kinoshita, and T. Shiromizu,Asymptotic flatness at null infinity in arbitrary dimensions, Phys. Rev. D84 (2011) 044055, [arXiv:1104.0303]

2011 arXiv
[78]

Hollands, A

S. Hollands, A. Ishibashi, and R. M. Wald,BMS Supertranslations and Memory in Four and Higher Dimensions, Class. Quant. Grav.34 (2017), no. 15 155005, [arXiv:1612.03290]

2017 arXiv
[79]

Mao and H

P. Mao and H. Ouyang,Note on soft theorems and memories in even dimensions, Phys. Lett. B 774 (2017) 715–722, [arXiv:1707.07118]

2017 arXiv
[80]

Pate, A.-M

M. Pate, A.-M. Raclariu, and A. Strominger,Gravitational Memory in Higher Dimensions, JHEP 06 (2018) 138, [arXiv:1712.01204]

2018 arXiv
[81]

Aggarwal,Supertranslations in Higher Dimensions Revisited, Phys

A. Aggarwal,Supertranslations in Higher Dimensions Revisited, Phys. Rev. D99 (2019), no. 2 026015, [arXiv:1811.00093]

2019 arXiv
[82]

He and P

T. He and P. Mitra,Asymptotic symmetries in (d + 2)-dimensional gauge theories, JHEP 10 (2019) 277, [arXiv:1903.03607]

2019 arXiv
[83]

Henneaux and C

M. Henneaux and C. Troessaert,Asymptotic structure of electromagnetism in higher spacetime dimensions, Phys. Rev. D99 (2019), no. 12 125006, [arXiv:1903.04437]

2019 arXiv
[84]

Campoleoni, D

A. Campoleoni, D. Francia, and C. Heissenberg,Electromagnetic and color memory in even dimensions, Phys. Rev. D100 (2019), no. 8 085015, [arXiv:1907.05187]

2019 arXiv
[85]

Campoleoni, D

A. Campoleoni, D. Francia, and C. Heissenberg,On asymptotic symmetries in higher dimensions for any spin, JHEP 12 (2020) 129, [arXiv:2011.04420]

2020 arXiv
[86]

Capone,General null asymptotics and superrotation-compatible configuration spaces in d ≥ 4, JHEP 10 (2021) 158, [arXiv:2108.01203]

F. Capone,General null asymptotics and superrotation-compatible configuration spaces in d ≥ 4, JHEP 10 (2021) 158, [arXiv:2108.01203]. [Erratum: JHEP 02, 113 (2022)]

2021 arXiv
[87]

Y. Pano, A. Puhm, and E. Trevisani,Symmetries in Celestial CFTd, JHEP 07 (2023) 076, [arXiv:2302.10222]

2023 arXiv
[88]

Salamon,Quaternionic Kähler Manifolds, Invent

S. Salamon,Quaternionic Kähler Manifolds, Invent. Math. 67 (1982) 143–172

1982
[89]

N. J. Hitchin, A. Karlhede, U. Lindstrom, and M. Rocek,Hyperkahler Metrics and Supersymmetry, Commun. Math. Phys.108 (1987) 535

1987
[90]

R. S. Ward,Completely Solvable Gauge Field Equations in Dimension Greater Than Four, Nucl. Phys. B236 (1984) 381–396. – 33 –

1984
[91]

Witten,Perturbative gauge theory as a string theory in twistor space, Commun

E. Witten,Perturbative gauge theory as a string theory in twistor space, Commun. Math. Phys. 252 (2004) 189–258, [hep-th/0312171]

2004 arXiv
[92]

Berkovits,An Alternative string theory in twistor space for N=4 superYang-Mills, Phys

N. Berkovits,An Alternative string theory in twistor space for N=4 superYang-Mills, Phys. Rev. Lett.93 (2004) 011601, [hep-th/0402045]

2004 arXiv
[93]

Adamo, L

T. Adamo, L. Mason, and A. Sharma,Twistor sigma models for quaternionic geometry and graviton scattering, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.27 (2023), no. 3 623–681, [arXiv:2103.16984]

2023 arXiv
[94]

A. L. Besse,Einstein Manifolds. Springer-Verlag, 1987

1987
[95]

Berger,A Panoramic View of Riemannian Geometry

M. Berger,A Panoramic View of Riemannian Geometry. Springer-Verlag, 2003

2003
[96]

D. D. Joyce,Riemannian Holonomy Groups and Calibrated Geometry. Oxford University Press, 2007

2007
[97]

Verbitsky and D

M. Verbitsky and D. Kaledin,Hyperkahler Manifolds. International Press, 2010

2010
[98]

Bridgeland,Geometry from Donaldson-Thomas invariants, inIntegrability, quantization, and geometry II: Quantum theories and algebraic geometry, Proc

T. Bridgeland,Geometry from Donaldson-Thomas invariants, inIntegrability, quantization, and geometry II: Quantum theories and algebraic geometry, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. Amer. Math. Soc., pp. 1–66, 2021.arXiv:1912.06504

2021 arXiv
[99]

Bridgeland and I

T. Bridgeland and I. A. B. Strachan,Complex hyperkähler structures defined by Donaldson–Thomas invariants, Lett. Math. Phys.111 (2021), no. 2 54, [arXiv:2006.13059]

2021 arXiv
[100]

Alexandrov and B

S. Alexandrov and B. Pioline,Heavenly metrics, BPS indices and twistors, Lett. Math. Phys. 111 (2021), no. 5 116, [arXiv:2104.10540]

2021 arXiv
[101]

T. N. Bailey and M. G. Eastwood,Complex Paraconformal Manifolds – their Differential Geometry and Twistor Theory, Forum Math. 3 (1991) 61–104

1991
[102]

M. F. Atiyah, N. J. Hitchin, and I. M. Singer,Selfduality in Four-Dimensional Riemannian Geometry, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A362 (1978) 425–461

1978
[103]

LeBrun,Quaternionic-Kahler manifolds and conformal geometry, Math

C. LeBrun,Quaternionic-Kahler manifolds and conformal geometry, Math. Ann. 284 (1989) 353–376

1989
[104]

Kodaira,A Theorem of Completeness of Characteristic Systems for Analytic Families of Compact Submanifolds of Complex Manifolds, Ann

K. Kodaira,A Theorem of Completeness of Characteristic Systems for Analytic Families of Compact Submanifolds of Complex Manifolds, Ann. Math. 75 (1962) 146–162

1962
[105]

Kodaira,On Stability of Compact Submanifolds of Complex Manifolds, Am

K. Kodaira,On Stability of Compact Submanifolds of Complex Manifolds, Am. J. Math.85 (1963) 79–94

1963
[106]

S. G. Gindikin,A construction of hyper-Kahler metrics, Funct. Anal. Appl.20 (1986) 238–240

1986
[107]

LeBrun and L

C. LeBrun and L. J. Mason,Nonlinear gravitons, null geodesics, and holomorphic disks, math/0504582

arXiv
[108]

Dunajski, Null Kähler Geometry and Isomonodromic Deformations, Commun

M. Dunajski, Null Kähler Geometry and Isomonodromic Deformations, Commun. Math. Phys. 391 (2022), no. 1 77–105, [arXiv:2010.11216]

2022 arXiv
[109]

Mason,Gravity from holomorphic discs and celestialLw1+∞ symmetries, Lett

L. Mason,Gravity from holomorphic discs and celestialLw1+∞ symmetries, Lett. Math. Phys. 113 (2023), no. 6 111, [arXiv:2212.10895]

2023 arXiv
[110]

Corrigan, C

E. Corrigan, C. Devchand, D. B. Fairlie, and J. Nuyts,First Order Equations for Gauge Fields in Spaces of Dimension Greater Than Four, Nucl. Phys. B214 (1983) 452–464

1983
[111]

Corrigan, P

E. Corrigan, P. Goddard, and A. Kent,Some Comments on the Adhm Construction in 4k-dimensions, Commun. Math. Phys.100 (1985) 1. – 34 –

1985
[112]

S. M. Salamon,Quaternionic structures and twistor space, inGlobal Riemannian Geometry (T. J. Willmore and N. Hitchin, eds.). Ellis Horwood, 1984

1984
[113]

Mamone Capria and S

M. Mamone Capria and S. M. Salamon,Yang-Mills fields on quaternionic spaces, Nonlinearity 1 (1988) 517–530

1988
[114]

Verbitsky,Hyperholomorphic bundles, alg-geom/9307008

M. Verbitsky,Hyperholomorphic bundles, alg-geom/9307008

arXiv
[115]

V. Y. Kraines,Topology of quaternionic manifolds, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.122 (1966) 357–367

1966
[116]

Kaledin and M

D. Kaledin and M. Verbitsky,Non-Hermitian Yang-Mills connections, Selecta Mathematica 4 (1998) 279–320, [alg-geom/9606019]

1998 arXiv
[117]

M. F. Atiyah and R. S. Ward,Instantons and Algebraic Geometry, Commun. Math. Phys. 55 (1977) 117–124

1977
[118]

R. S. Ward and R. O. Wells,Twistor geometry and field theory. Cambridge University Press, 1991

1991
[119]

G. A. J. Sparling,Dynamically Broken Symmetry and Global Yang-Mills in Minkowski Space, inFurther Advances in Twistor Theory(L. J. Mason and L. P. Hughston, eds.), vol. 231, ch. 1.4.2. Pitman Research Notes in Mathematics, 1990

1990
[120]

J. S. Ivancovich, E. T. Newman, and L. J. Mason,On the density of the Ward ansatze in the space of antiselfdual Yang-Mills solutions, Commun. Math. Phys.130 (1990) 139–155

1990
[121]

L. J. Mason and D. Skinner,The Complete Planar S-matrix of N=4 SYM as a Wilson Loop in Twistor Space, JHEP 12 (2010) 018, [arXiv:1009.2225]

2010 arXiv
[122]

Bullimore and D

M. Bullimore and D. Skinner,Holomorphic Linking, Loop Equations and Scattering Amplitudes in Twistor Space, arXiv:1101.1329

arXiv
[123]

Penrose,Solutions of the zero-rest-mass equations, J

R. Penrose,Solutions of the zero-rest-mass equations, J. Math. Phys.10 (1969) 38–39

1969
[124]

N. J. Hitchin,Linear field equations on selfdual spaces, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A370 (1980) 173–191

1980
[125]

Alexandrov, B

S. Alexandrov, B. Pioline, F. Saueressig, and S. Vandoren,Linear perturbations of Hyperkahler metrics, Lett. Math. Phys.87 (2009) 225–265, [arXiv:0806.4620]

2009 arXiv
[126]

M. F. Atiyah,Geometry of Yang-Mills Fields. Scuola Normale Superiore - Pisa, 1979

1979
[127]

R. S. Ward,Ansatze for Selfdual Yang-Mills Fields, Commun. Math. Phys.80 (1981) 563–574

1981
[128]

J. F. Plebanski,Some solutions of complex Einstein equations, J. Math. Phys.16 (1975) 2395–2402

1975
[129]

V. P. Nair,A Current Algebra for Some Gauge Theory Amplitudes, Phys. Lett. B214 (1988) 215–218

1988
[130]

Berkovits and E

N. Berkovits and E. Witten,Conformal supergravity in twistor-string theory, JHEP 08 (2004) 009, [hep-th/0406051]

2004 arXiv
[131]

Azevedo and O

T. Azevedo and O. T. Engelund,Ambitwistor formulations of R2 gravity and (DF)2 gauge theories, JHEP 11 (2017) 052, [arXiv:1707.02192]

2017 arXiv
[132]

Azevedo, M

T. Azevedo, M. Chiodaroli, H. Johansson, and O. Schlotterer,Heterotic and bosonic string amplitudes via field theory, JHEP 10 (2018) 012, [arXiv:1803.05452]. – 35 –

2018 arXiv
[133]

Adamo, E

T. Adamo, E. Casali, and S. Nekovar,Yang-Mills theory from the worldsheet, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018), no. 8 086022, [arXiv:1807.09171]

2018 arXiv
[134]

De Causmaecker, R

P. De Causmaecker, R. Gastmans, W. Troost, and T. T. Wu,Multiple Bremsstrahlung in Gauge Theories at High-Energies. 1. General Formalism for Quantum Electrodynamics, Nucl. Phys. B206 (1982) 53–60

1982
[135]

Kleiss and W

R. Kleiss and W. J. Stirling,Spinor Techniques for Calculating p anti-p —> W+- / Z0 + Jets, Nucl. Phys. B262 (1985) 235–262

1985
[136]

Xu, D.-H

Z. Xu, D.-H. Zhang, and L. Chang,Helicity Amplitudes for Multiple Bremsstrahlung in Massless Nonabelian Gauge Theories, Nucl. Phys. B291 (1987) 392–428

1987
[137]

F. A. Berends and W. Giele,The Six Gluon Process as an Example of Weyl-Van Der Waerden Spinor Calculus, Nucl. Phys. B294 (1987) 700–732

1987
[138]

Chalmers and W

G. Chalmers and W. Siegel,Simplifying algebra in Feynman graphs, Part I: Spinors, Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 045012, [hep-ph/9708251]

1999 arXiv
[139]

Adamo, W

T. Adamo, W. Bu, E. Casali, and A. Sharma,Celestial operator products from the worldsheet, JHEP 06 (2022) 052, [arXiv:2111.02279]

2022 arXiv
[140]

Hodges,A simple formula for gravitational MHV amplitudes, arXiv:1204.1930

A. Hodges,A simple formula for gravitational MHV amplitudes, arXiv:1204.1930

1930 arXiv
[141]

M. G. Eastwood, R. Penrose, and R. O. Wells,Cohomology and Massless Fields, Commun. Math. Phys. 78 (1981) 305–351

1981
[142]

Penrose,Null hypersurface initial data for classical fields of arbitrary spin and for general relativity, Gen

R. Penrose,Null hypersurface initial data for classical fields of arbitrary spin and for general relativity, Gen. Rel. Grav.12 (1980) 225–264

1980
[143]

L. J. Mason,Dolbeault representative from characteristic initial data at null infinity, in Further Advances in Twistor Theory(L. J. Mason and L. P. Hughston, eds.), vol. 231, ch. 1.2.16. Pitman Research Notes in Mathematics, 1990

1990
[144]

Adamo and U

T. Adamo and U. Kol,Classical double copy at null infinity, Class. Quant. Grav.39 (2022), no. 10 105007, [arXiv:2109.07832]

2022 arXiv
[145]

E. T. Newman,Heaven and Its Properties, Gen. Rel. Grav.7 (1976) 107–111

1976
[146]

R. O. Hansen, E. T. Newman, R. Penrose, and K. P. Tod,The Metric and Curvature Properties of H Space, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A363 (1978) 445–468

1978
[147]

M. Ko, M. Ludvigsen, E. T. Newman, and K. P. Tod,The theory of H-space, Phys. Rept. 71 (1981), no. 2 51–139

1981
[148]

R. P. Geroch, A. Held, and R. Penrose,A space-time calculus based on pairs of null directions, J. Math. Phys.14 (1973) 874–881

1973
[149]

Newman and R

E. Newman and R. Penrose,An Approach to gravitational radiation by a method of spin coefficients, J. Math. Phys.3 (1962) 566–578. – 36 –

1962
[2021]

arXiv:2111.11392. – 29 –

arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Pasterski, S.-H

S. Pasterski, S.-H. Shao, and A. Strominger,Flat Space Amplitudes and Conformal Symmetry of the Celestial Sphere, Phys. Rev. D96 (2017), no. 6 065026, [arXiv:1701.00049]

arXiv 2017

[2] [2]

Pasterski and S.-H

S. Pasterski and S.-H. Shao,Conformal basis for flat space amplitudes, Phys. Rev. D96 (2017), no. 6 065022, [arXiv:1705.01027]

arXiv 2017

[3] [3]

Pasterski, S.-H

S. Pasterski, S.-H. Shao, and A. Strominger,Gluon Amplitudes as 2d Conformal Correlators, Phys. Rev. D96 (2017), no. 8 085006, [arXiv:1706.03917]

arXiv 2017

[4] [4]

Raclariu,Lectures on Celestial Holography, arXiv:2107.02075

A.-M. Raclariu,Lectures on Celestial Holography, arXiv:2107.02075

arXiv

[5] [5]

Pasterski,Lectures on celestial amplitudes, Eur

S. Pasterski,Lectures on celestial amplitudes, Eur. Phys. J. C81 (2021), no. 12 1062, [arXiv:2108.04801]

arXiv 2021

[6] [6]

Pasterski, M

S. Pasterski, M. Pate, and A.-M. Raclariu,Celestial Holography, inSnowmass 2021, 11,

2021

[7] [7]

McLoughlin, A

T. McLoughlin, A. Puhm, and A.-M. Raclariu,The SAGEX review on scattering amplitudes chapter 11: soft theorems and celestial amplitudes, J. Phys. A55 (2022), no. 44 443012, [arXiv:2203.13022]

arXiv 2022

[8] [8]

Pasterski,A Chapter on Celestial Holography, arXiv:2310.04932

S. Pasterski,A Chapter on Celestial Holography, arXiv:2310.04932

arXiv