Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Irony in Emojis: A Comparative Study of Human and LLM Interpretation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.11241 v1 pith:XT6YW7NO submitted 2025-01-20 cs.CL cs.CVcs.SI

Irony in Emojis: A Comparative Study of Human and LLM Interpretation

classification cs.CL cs.CVcs.SI
keywords emojisgpt-4ohumanironyfactorsinterpretationlanguagenuanced
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Emojis have become a universal language in online communication, often carrying nuanced and context-dependent meanings. Among these, irony poses a significant challenge for Large Language Models (LLMs) due to its inherent incongruity between appearance and intent. This study examines the ability of GPT-4o to interpret irony in emojis. By prompting GPT-4o to evaluate the likelihood of specific emojis being used to express irony on social media and comparing its interpretations with human perceptions, we aim to bridge the gap between machine and human understanding. Our findings reveal nuanced insights into GPT-4o's interpretive capabilities, highlighting areas of alignment with and divergence from human behavior. Additionally, this research underscores the importance of demographic factors, such as age and gender, in shaping emoji interpretation and evaluates how these factors influence GPT-4o's performance.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Cognitive Mismatch in Multimodal Large Language Models for Discrete Symbol Understanding

    cs.AI 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    MLLMs exhibit a consistent recognition-reasoning inversion on discrete visual symbols across domains, underperforming on elementary perception while appearing competent on higher-level reasoning via linguistic compensation.