Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Replica Wormholes, Modular Entropy, and Capacity of Entanglement in JT Gravity

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper establishes that at late times the modular entropy and the capacity of entanglement in both the End-of-the-World model and the island model of JT gravity are controlled by the product $n\beta$, falling as $1/(n\beta)$, and uses…

desk verdict A solid, incremental extension of the replica wormhole program whose island-model 1/(nβ) scaling needs an error estimate before it is taken at face value. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.11474 v2 pith:E4EVSZZN submitted 2025-01-20 hep-th gr-qcquant-ph

Ming-Hui Yu , Shu-Yi Lin , Xian-Hui Ge This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thgr-qcquant-ph
keywords replicawormholesmodularentropycapacityofentanglementJTgravityislandformulaRényiHawkingradiationPagecurve
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks what happens to entanglement measures of black hole radiation when the number of copies $n$ in the replica trick is kept finite instead of being sent to $1$ at the end of the calculation. Working in two tractable models of black hole evaporation in Jackiw–Teitelboim (JT) gravity—the End-of-the-World brane model and the eternal two-sided black hole coupled to a bath—it computes the modular entropy $S_{\rm mod}$ (a replica-parameter generalization of entropy) and the capacity of entanglement $C_n$ (a measure of how widely the entanglement spectrum is spread) as functions of $n$. The central result is that at late times both quantities are set by the product $n\beta$: they decrease as $1/(n\beta)$, so increasing the number of replica copies acts like lowering the temperature. Because the ordinary entanglement entropy is only the $n\to1$ limit, keeping $n$ finite exposes how each additional replica copy reshapes the radiation state, information the von Neumann entropy cannot see. On this basis the paper reads $n$ as an inverse temperature in the replica ensemble and proposes a finite-$n$ island formula that reduces to the standard one at $n=1$.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing objects are the replica trick at general $n$, the modular entropy $S_{\rm mod}=n^2\partial_n[(n-1)S_n/n]$, and the capacity of entanglement $C_n=-n\partial_n S_{\rm mod}$. In the gravitational path integral, $\mathrm{Tr}(\rho_R^n)$ is evaluated by summing over replica geometries, and the competition between the fully disconnected saddle and the fully connected replica wormhole saddle controls the Page-like behavior. For the island model, the finite-$n$ generalized entropy is $S_{\rm gen}(n)=\sum_{\partial I}(S_0+\phi_n(\partial I))+S_{\rm mod}^{\rm CFT}(R\cup I)$, extremized over the island boundary to locate the quantum extremal surface, with the conical-singularity dilaton $\phi_n=2\pi\phi_r/(n\beta)\tanh(2\pi\sigma/(n\beta))$ replacing the area term. The technical bottleneck is the conformal welding problem—finding the holomorphic maps $F$ and $G$ that glue the gravitational disk to the bath—solved at leading order by setting $F=G$ in the high-temperature limit $\kappa=c\beta G_N/(24\pi\phi_r)\ll1$. The interpretive identity is that $n$ disks at inverse temperature $\beta$ glue into a single disk at inverse temperature $n\beta$.

What would settle it

Compute the modular entropy including the next-order corrections to the conformal welding maps $F$ and $G$ in Eq. (3.20), or include a second quantum extremal surface in the extremization of Eq. (1.5). If the prefactor of $1/(n\beta)$ in $S_{\rm mod}^{\rm island}$ or $C_n^{\rm island}$ acquires an $n$-dependent coefficient, or if the extremum shifts away from $a\to\infty$, the claimed universal scaling and the finite-$n$ island formula would be contradicted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes a late-time statement shared by two models: the modular entropy and the capacity of entanglement are controlled by $n$ times the inverse temperature $\beta$. In the canonical End-of-the-World model it obtains $S_{\rm mod}^{\rm late}=S_0+4\pi^2/(n\beta)$ and $C_n^{\rm late}=4\pi^2/(n\beta)$ (Eqs. (2.54)–(2.55)), while in the single-island configuration of the eternal JT black hole it obtains $S_{\rm mod}^{\rm island}=S_0+2\pi\phi_r/(n\beta)+O(b/(n\beta))$ and $C_n^{\rm island}=2\pi\phi_r/(n\beta)+O(b/(n\beta))$ (Eqs. (3.45)–(3.46)). The capacity of entanglement therefore does not decay to zero at late times in these settings; it saturates at a positive value that decreases as $n$ or $\beta$ grows. The paper interprets the coupling as geometric: $n$ replicated AdS$_2$ disks, each at inverse temperature $\beta$, glue along their boundaries into one disk at inverse temperature $n\beta$, so $n$ acts as an inverse temperature in the replica ensemble. Using that interpretation, it generalizes the island formula to finite $n$ as $S_R(n)=\min\,\mathrm{ext}\big[\sum_{\partial I}(S_0+\phi_n(\partial I))+S_{\rm mod}(R\cup I)\big]$ (Eq. (1.5)), which returns to the standard island formula when $n\to1$.

Load-bearing premise

The late-time results assume a hot, weakly coupled black hole in which the gluing of the replica copies is handled only to leading order and a single island boundary sits exactly at the horizon; if higher-order gluing corrections or additional island boundaries matter, the $1/(n\beta)$ scaling and the proposed finite-$n$ island formula could fail.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In the canonical EoW model, the late-time modular entropy and capacity of entanglement both decrease as either the replica number $n$ or the inverse temperature $\beta$ increases, with the explicit forms $S_{\rm mod}^{\rm late}=S_0+4\pi^2/(n\beta)$ and $C_n^{\rm late}=4\pi^2/(n\beta)$.
  • In the microcanonical EoW ensemble, the modular entropy follows an $n$-dependent Page curve and saturates to $S_0$ at late times, while the capacity of entanglement peaks at the Page time and then decays to zero, with the peak value growing with $n$.
  • For the single-island JT configuration, the modular entropy and capacity of entanglement saturate at $S_0+2\pi\phi_r/(n\beta)$ and $2\pi\phi_r/(n\beta)$, respectively, matching the canonical EoW late-time behavior when $\phi_r=2\pi$.
  • The proposed finite-$n$ island formula (1.5) reduces to the standard island formula as $n\to1$ and gives a concrete handle on how the island phase purifies black hole radiation at finite replica number.
  • Across both models, configurations with more connected replica wormholes—or with an island—produce lower modular entropy and capacity, which the paper reads as evidence that more $n$ copies mean more effective purification of thermal radiation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: if the $n\beta$ identification is exact, the finite-$n$ island formula could be recast as a statement about a single black hole at temperature $nT$; a direct test would be to compute the modular entropy at fixed $n\beta$ while varying $n$ and check whether all data collapse onto one curve.
  • Beyond the paper: because the capacity of entanglement behaves like a heat capacity in the replica ensemble, it is a sharper diagnostic of the Page transition than the von Neumann entropy; its microcanonical peak rises with $n$, a signature that could be sought in random-matrix or tensor-network models of evaporation.
  • Beyond the paper: applying the finite-$n$ island formula (1.5) to other dilaton-gravity, cosmological, or de Sitter island setups would predict the same $1/(n\beta)$-type saturation; observing a different $n$ dependence in those settings would delimit how much of the effect is special to JT gravity.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies how the modular entropy and the capacity of entanglement depend on the replica parameter n in two JT-gravity settings: the End-of-the-World (EoW) model and the eternal two-sided black hole coupled to a thermal bath (the island model). For the EoW model it derives n-dependent Page-curve-like evolution in the microcanonical and canonical ensembles, with late-time canonical results S_mod^late = S0 + 4π^2/(nβ) and C_n^late = 4π^2/(nβ). For the island model it constructs a finite-n replica geometry, computes the modular entropy and capacity in a high-temperature, weak-coupling limit, obtains late-time expressions of the form 2πφ_r/(nβ) plus subleading terms, and proposes a finite-n generalization of the island formula, S_R(n) = min ext[Σ(S0+φ_n(∂I))+S_mod(R∪I)]. The n→1 limits are stated to reduce to known results, and the late-time analytic expressions in the canonical EoW model are checked against numerical plots.

Significance. If the main claims hold, the paper would extend the replica-wormhole and island formalism beyond the n→1 limit and provide a suggestive statistical-mechanics interpretation of the replica parameter n as an inverse temperature, potentially giving a practical finite-n island formula. The paper has clear strengths: the EoW microcanonical and canonical calculations are explicit, the n→1 limits reproduce known results, and the analytic late-time approximation in the canonical EoW model is consistent with the numerical curves. However, the central island-model results—the 1/(nβ) scaling and the proposed finite-n island formula—are derived under a leading-order conformal-welding approximation and rely on discarding n-dependent matter terms whose suppression is not demonstrated. As a result, the main island-model claims should be regarded as provisional until these approximations are controlled.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.4, Eqs. (3.45)–(3.46)] The matter modular entropy contribution retained in (3.39) contains a term c/(6n) log[β/(πϵ ϵ_UV^2) e^{-2πb/β}] (or with the sign of the b-exponent possibly reversed; see minor comment). In passing to (3.45) and (3.46) this term is discarded as O(b/(nβ)). The n-dependence of this log term is not O(b/(nβ)): the constant part log[β/(πϵ ϵ_UV^2)] is independent of b and yields a contribution to C_n of order c/(6n), which is not parametrically smaller than the claimed leading term 2πφ_r/(nβ) except in the strict β→0 limit. At the parameters used to match the EoW results (φ_r=2π, β=3), there is no demonstrated suppression. The claimed equality between the island-model results and the EoW canonical results, and the universal 1/(nβ) scaling, are therefore not established.
  2. [§3.3–3.4, Eqs. (3.20) and (3.44)] The finite-n island calculation is performed at leading order in the high-temperature, weak-coupling limit by setting the conformal welding functions F=G (Eq. 3.20) and by using the resulting QES location a→∞ (Eq. 3.44). No estimate is given for the O(κ) corrections to F, G, the QES position, or the modular entropy. Since κ≡cβG_N/(24πφ_r)≪1 is the only small parameter, and since the central results (3.45), (3.46), and the proposed island formula (1.5) are obtained at this order, the 1/(nβ) scaling is not robust against the first corrections. The paper explicitly acknowledges this limitation in Section 4, but the issue is load-bearing and should be addressed with an explicit error estimate or by reformulating the claims as leading-order results.
  3. [§3.2, Eq. (3.15)] The capacity of entanglement is defined as C_n = -n∂_n S_mod under the assumption that the gravitational saddle used to define the modular entropy remains smooth under infinitesimal changes of n. This is an additional assumption beyond the quantum-extremal-surface prescription: for non-integer n the replica geometry is a Z_n orbifold with conical singularities, and it is not established that the dominant saddle varies smoothly or that the analytic continuation in n is well-behaved. Since C_n is a central output of the paper, this assumption should be justified, or at least its failure modes should be discussed.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§3.4, Eq. (3.45)] The sign of the b-dependent exponent in the log term appears inconsistent with the large-a limit of Eq. (3.39): taking cosh(2π(a+b)/β) - 1 ≈ (1/2)e^{2π(a+b)/β} and sinh(2πa/β) ≈ (1/2)e^{2πa/β} gives a factor e^{+2πb/β} inside the logarithm, not e^{-2πb/β}. Please check whether the sign is a typo and ensure the final expressions are consistent.
  2. [§2.2, Eq. (2.26)] The microcanonical expression for t∈[0,1] is extended to t≥1 simply by replacing t with 1/t. A short justification would be helpful, for example by noting that the delta-function contribution λ'=0 vanishes for n>0 in the integrals (2.23)–(2.24), so the replacement is consistent with the density (2.21b); as written, the step is stated without proof.
  3. [§2.3, Eqs. (2.46)–(2.47)] The early-time expansion of S_n^(early) uses the relation ∫dλ D(λ)(λ-1/k)^n = n Z2/Z1^2 in (2.47). The validity of this relation for the canonical-ensemble density is not fully explained, and the order of the expansion in (2.46) would benefit from a more explicit derivation.
  4. [General] The manuscript contains numerous typos and minor language issues, including "calcluation" in §2.1, "satae" in Eq. (2.12), "dose" in §3.1, and "recovers" versus "recover" in §4. A careful proofread is needed before publication.
  5. [§4, Figure 11] The statement that n replica AdS2 disks at inverse temperature β glue into a single disk at inverse temperature nβ is an interpretation, not a derived consequence of the calculations. The paper should clearly distinguish this heuristic picture from the explicit results, especially when it is used to motivate the finite-n island formula (1.5).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the nβ dependence is a derived consequence of the replica construction, not an input assumption that makes the output equivalent to the premise.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The EoW late-time results (2.54)-(2.55) are obtained by inserting the approximate thermal spectral density (2.50) into the definitions (2.41)-(2.42) and evaluating the integrals analytically; they are not obtained by fitting 1/(nβ). The island results (3.45)-(3.46) follow from the dilaton (3.32), which is derived from the replica uniformization w̃^n = w and the scalar boundary condition φ̃_r = φ_r/n, and from the leading-order conformal welding functions F = G (3.20). The appearance of nβ is a consequence of the replica geometry for a thermal state, not an input assumption that makes the conclusion equivalent to the premise: the paper does not define S_mod or C_n as thermal entropy at nβ, and the coefficients (2πφ_r, 4π²) and the QES location a → ∞ are derived, not postulated. The interpretation of n as an inverse temperature in Section 4 is explicitly flagged as an analogy ('only an analogical association'), so it is not used as a load-bearing derivation of (1.5); formula (1.5) is derived independently in Section 3.2 from the holographic Rényi entropy formula and the QES condition. Concerns about O(κ) welding corrections, discarded matter terms, and the smoothness of the n-saddle are correctness and approximation risks, not circularity. No load-bearing self-citation is present; the cited proofs ([79], [132], [14]) are external to the authors. Hence no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard EoW and JT replica wormhole machinery, with the finite-n island result additionally depending on leading-order conformal welding, single-QES selection, and the interpretive gluing of n disks. Several of these assumptions are explicitly flagged by the authors. No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • S0 = 10 (microcanonical figures), 2 (canonical figures)
    Topological entropy term in JT gravity; chosen by hand for plots and does not affect the 1/(n beta) scaling.
  • mu = 5
    EoW brane mass; used in canonical numerical plots, and the late-time analytic result assumes mu much greater than 1/beta.
  • beta = 3 (canonical figures); varied as 2, 2.5, 3
    Inverse temperature of the radiation or bath; appears with n in the denominator of the late-time results.
  • phi_r = set to 2 pi when matching EoW results
    Boundary dilaton value in the island model; the matching to the EoW canonical result uses phi_r = 2 pi in section 3.4.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Planar approximation for the EoW model: only planar replica geometries contribute, with non-planar contributions suppressed by e^{-S0}.
    Used to write Tr(rho^n) as a sum over leading connected and disconnected saddles (Eq 2.11). This is standard in the EoW model but limits the validity of the calculation.
  • domain assumption The canonical EoW resolvent is solved with the approximate density D(lambda) = integral of rho-tilde(s) delta(lambda - lambda0 - w(s)) ds (Eq 2.39).
    This approximation underpins the canonical numerical results and late-time formulas; it is justified by the control parameter (2.38) but is not exact.
  • domain assumption In the island model, 1 much less than c much less than 1/G_N and the high-temperature weak-coupling limit kappa = c beta G_N/(24 pi phi_r) much less than 1, with conformal welding solved at leading order by setting F = G.
    All finite-n island results in section 3.4 are obtained in this limit; the paper explicitly defers subleading welding corrections to future work.
  • domain assumption A single quantum extremal surface configuration is sufficient to compute the late-time modular entropy and capacity.
    Acknowledged in section 4 with reference to [79]; the proposed finite-n island formula may require multi-QES contributions for full validity.
  • ad hoc to paper The saddle used to define the modular entropy remains smooth under infinitesimal n variations, allowing the capacity of entanglement to be defined by differentiation with respect to n.
    Stated at Eq (3.15); no proof is given that the saddle remains smooth for the configurations considered.
  • ad hoc to paper At late times, n replica AdS2 disks at inverse temperature beta glue into one disk at inverse temperature n beta (Figure 11).
    This interpretive step is used to generalize the island formula to Eq (1.5); the paper itself calls the statistical-mechanics correspondence an analogy.
  • ad hoc to paper The microcanonical density expression, valid for t in [0,1], is extended to late times by replacing t with 1/t (Eq 2.26).
    The paper states the hypergeometric expression is valid only before the Page time and asserts the replacement t to 1/t without a derivation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Replica Wormholes, Modular Entropy, and Capacity of Entanglement in JT Gravity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/E4EVSZZN

@misc{pith2026250111474,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Replica Wormholes, Modular Entropy, and Capacity of Entanglement in JT Gravity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/E4EVSZZN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.11474}
}
abstract

By employing the replica trick we study the impact of the replica parameter $n$ on the modular entropy and the capacity of entanglement in the End of the World (EoW) model and the island model, respectively. For the EoW model, we present $n$-dependent evolution curves of the modular entropy and the capacity of entanglement under both microcanonical and canonical ensembles. In particular, in the canonical ensemble, all quantities decrease as $n$ increases at late times. For the island model, we develop the replica geometry for finite $n$ and re-evaluate the modular entropy and the capacity of entanglement in a two-sided eternal Jackiw-Teitelboim black hole coupled with a thermal bath. In the case of a single island configuration, the modular entropy and capacity of entanglement closely resemble the thermal entropy and the heat capacity, respectively, yielding results analogous to those obtained in the canonical ensemble for the EoW model. The analysis of the results from these two models strongly indicates that in geometries with a greater number of $n$ copies, more connected geometries effectively purify thermal Hawking radiation. In addition, we compare these findings with statistical mechanics and provide an interpretation for the replica parameter $n$. Finally, we generalize the island formula to accommodate the finite $n$ case under this interpretation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Island of acoustic black hole in Schwarzschild spacetime

    hep-th 2025-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    For a Schwarzschild-surrounded acoustic black hole, phonon entanglement entropy follows a Page curve in the non-extremal case but diverges (no Page time) in the extremal case, according to the island formula.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

139 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [79]

    Replica Rényi Wormholes and Generalised Modular Entropy in JT Gravity,

    Timothy J. Hollowood, S. Prem Kumar and L. C. Piper, “Replica Rényi Wormholes and Generalised Modular Entropy in JT Gravity,” JHEP10, 169 (2024) arXiv:2406.16339

    arXiv 2024

  2. [1]

    Particle Creation by Black Holes,

    S. W. Hawking, “Particle Creation by Black Holes,” Commun. Math. Phys.43, 199 (1975). Erratum;[Commun. Math. Phys.46, 206 (1976)]

    1975

  3. [2]

    Breakdown of Predictability in Gravitational Collapse,

    S. W. Hawking, “Breakdown of Predictability in Gravitational Collapse,” Phys. Rev. D14, (1976) 2460-2473

    1976

  4. [3]

    The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole,

    A. Almheiri, N. Engelhardt, D. Marolf and H. Maxfield, “The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole,” JHEP12, 063 (2019) arXiv:1905.08762

    arXiv 2019

  5. [4]

    The Page curve of Hawking ridiation from semiclassical geometry,

    A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan, J. Maldacena and Y. Zhao, “The Page curve of Hawking ridiation from semiclassical geometry,” JHEP03, 149 (2020) arXiv:1908.10996

    arXiv 2020

  6. [5]

    Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox,

    G. Penington, “Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox,” JHEP 09 002 (2020) arXiv:1905.08255

    arXiv 2020

  7. [6]

    The entropy of Hawking radiation,

    A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian and A. Tajdini, “The entropy of Hawking radiation,” Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 35002 (2021) arXiv:2006.06872

    arXiv 2021

  8. [7]

    Quantum Extremal Surfaces: Holographic Entanglement Entropy beyond the Classical Regime,

    N. Engelhardt and A. Wall, “Quantum Extremal Surfaces: Holographic Entanglement Entropy beyond the Classical Regime,” JHEP01, 073 (2015) arXiv:1408.3203

    arXiv 2015

Show all 139 references
  1. [8]

    Information in black hole radiation,

    D. N. Page, “Information in black hole radiation,” Phys. Rev. Lett.71, 3743-3746 (1993) arXiv:hep-th/9306083

    1993 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Time Dependence of Hawking Radiation Entropy,

    D. N. Page, “Time Dependence of Hawking Radiation Entropy,” JCAP1309, 028 (2013) arXiv:1301.4995

    2013 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT,

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, “Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT,” Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 181602 (2006) arXiv:hep-th/0603001

    2006 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Aspects of Holographic Entanglement Entropy,

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, “Aspects of Holographic Entanglement Entropy,” JHEP08 045 (2006) arXiv:hep-th/0605073

    2006 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Generalized gravitational entropy,

    A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena, “Generalized gravitational entropy,” JHEP08, 090 (2013) arXiv:1304.4926

    2013 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Replica wormholes and the black hole interior,

    G. Penington, S. Shenker, D. Stanford and Z. Yang, “Replica wormholes and the black hole interior,” JHEP 03, 205 (2022) arXiv:1911.11977

    2022 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Replica Wormholes and the Entropy of Hawking Radiation,

    A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian and A. Tajdini, “Replica Wormholes and the Entropy of Hawking Radiation,” JHEP05, 013 (2020) arXiv:1911.12333

    2020 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Replica wormholes for an evaporating 2D black hole,

    K Goto, T. Hartmana and A. Tajdini, “Replica wormholes for an evaporating 2D black hole,” JHEP 04, 289 (2021) arXiv:2011.09043

    2021 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Islands outside the horizon,

    A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan and J. Maldacena, “Islands outside the horizon,” arXiv:1910.11077

    1910 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Islands and Page Curves for Evaporating Black Holes in JT Gravity,

    T. Hollowood and S. Kumar, “Islands and Page Curves for Evaporating Black Holes in JT Gravity,” arXiv:2004.14944

    2004 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Notes on islands in asymptotically flat 2d dilaton black holes,

    T. Anegawa and N. Iizuka, “Notes on islands in asymptotically flat 2d dilaton black holes,” JHEP 07, 036 (2020) arXiv:2004.01601

    2020 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Page Curve for an Evaporating Black Hole,

    F. Gautason, L. Schneiderbauer, W. Sybesma and L. Thorlacius, “Page Curve for an Evaporating Black Hole,” JHEP05, 091 (2020) arXiv:2004.00598

    2020 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Islands in Asymptotically Flat 2D Gravity,

    T. Hartman, E. Shaghoulian and A. Strominger, “Islands in Asymptotically Flat 2D Gravity,” JHEP 07, 022 (2020) arXiv:2004.13857. – 38 –

    2020 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Islands and Page curves for a family of exactly solvable evaporating black holes,

    X. Wang, R. Li and J. Wang, “Islands and Page curves for a family of exactly solvable evaporating black holes,” Phys. Rev. D103, 126026 (2021) arXiv:2104.00224

    2021 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Island may not save the information paradox of Liouville black holes,

    R. Li, X. Wang and J. Wang, “Island may not save the information paradox of Liouville black holes,” Phys. Rev. D104, 106015 (2021) arXiv:2105.03271

    2021 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Entanglement Islands in Generalized Two-dimensional Dilaton Black Holes,

    M. Yu and X. Ge, “Entanglement Islands in Generalized Two-dimensional Dilaton Black Holes,” Phys. Rev. D107, 066020 (2023) arXiv:2208.01943

    2023 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Page Curve and Phase Transition in deformed Jackiw-Teitelboim Gravity,

    C. Lu, M. Yu and X. Ge, “Page Curve and Phase Transition in deformed Jackiw-Teitelboim Gravity,” Eur. Phys. J. C83, 215 (2023) arXiv:2210.14750

    2023 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Microcanonical Action and the Entropy of Hawking Radiation,

    J. F. Pedraze, A. Svesko, W. Sybesma and M. R. Visser, “Microcanonical Action and the Entropy of Hawking Radiation,” Phys. Rev. D105, 126010 (2022) arXiv:2111.06912

    2022 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Semi-classical thermodynamics of quantum extremal surfaces in Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity,

    J. F. Pedraze, A. Svesko, W. Sybesma and M. R. Visser, “Semi-classical thermodynamics of quantum extremal surfaces in Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity,” JHEP12, 134 (2021) arXiv:2107.10358

    2021 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Islands in cosmology,

    T. Hartman, Y. Jiang, and E. Shaghoulian, “Islands in cosmology,” JHEP11, 111 (2020) arXiv:2008.01022

    2020 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Islands in de Sitter space,

    V. Balasubramanian, A. Kar, and T. Ugajin “Islands in de Sitter space,” JHEP02 072 (2021) arXiv:2008.05275

    2021 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Pure de Sitter space and the island moving back in time,

    W. Sybesma, “Pure de Sitter space and the island moving back in time,” Class. Quant. Grav. 38, 145012 (2021) arXiv:2008.07994

    2021 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Information paradox and its resolution in de sitter holography,

    H. Geng, Y. Nomura, and H. Sun, “Information paradox and its resolution in de sitter holography,” Phys. Rev. D103, 126004 (2021) arXiv:2103.07477

    2021 arXiv

  24. [31]

    The Price of Curiosity: Information Recovery in de Sitter Space,

    L. Aalsma and W. Sybesma, “The Price of Curiosity: Information Recovery in de Sitter Space,” JHEP 05, 291 (2021) arXiv:2104.00006

    2021 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Comments on wormholes, ensembles, and cosmology,

    M. V. Raamsdonk, “Comments on wormholes, ensembles, and cosmology,” JHEP12 156 (2021) arXiv:2008.02259

    2021 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Islands in Flat-Space Cosmology,

    S. Azarnia, R. Fareghbal, A. Naseh, and H. Zolfi, “Islands in Flat-Space Cosmology,” Phys. Rev. D 104, 126017 (2021) arXiv:2109.04795

    2021 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Entanglement between two disjoint universes,

    V. Balasubramanian, A. Kar, and T. Ugajin “Entanglement between two disjoint universes,” JHEP 02, 136 (2021) arXiv:2008.05274

    2021 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Evaporation of black holes in flat space entangled with an auxiliary universe,

    A. Miyata and T. Ugajin, “Evaporation of black holes in flat space entangled with an auxiliary universe,” arXiv:2104.00183

    arXiv

  29. [37]

    Entanglement between two gravitating universes,

    V. Balasubramanian, A. Kar, and T. Ugajin “Entanglement between two gravitating universes,” Class. Quant. Grav.39, 174001 (2022). arXiv:2104.13383

    2022 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Information transfer with a gravitating bath,

    H. Geng, A. Karch, C. P. Pardavila, S. Raju, L. Randall, M. Riojas, and S. Shashi, “Information transfer with a gravitating bath,” SciPost Phys.10, 103 (2021) arXiv:2012.04671

    2021 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Islands with Gravitating Baths: Towards ER = EPR,

    L. Anderson, O. Parrikar, and R. M. Soni, “Islands with Gravitating Baths: Towards ER = EPR,” JHEP 10, 226 (2021) arXiv:2103.14746. – 39 –

    2021 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Thermodynamics and phase transitions of black holes in contact with a gravitating heat bath,

    D. Kotopoulis and C. Anastopoulos, “Thermodynamics and phase transitions of black holes in contact with a gravitating heat bath,” Class. Quantum Grav.38, 195026 (20221) arXiv:2105.11817

    arXiv

  33. [41]

    Quantum Extremal Islands Made Easy, Part III: Complexity on the Brane,

    J. Hernandez, R. C. Myers, and S. Ruan, “Quantum Extremal Islands Made Easy, Part III: Complexity on the Brane,” JEHP02, 173 (2021) arXiv:2010.16398

    2021 arXiv

  34. [42]

    A quantum circuit interpretation of evaporating black hole geometry,

    Y. Zhao, “A quantum circuit interpretation of evaporating black hole geometry,” JHEP07, 139 (2020) arXiv:1912.00909

    2020 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Topological shadows and complexity of islands in multiboundary wormholes,

    A. Bhattacharya, A. Chanda, S. Maulik, C. Northe, and S. Roy, “Topological shadows and complexity of islands in multiboundary wormholes,” JHEP02, 152 (2021) arXiv:2010.04134

    2021 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Islands and complexity of eternal black hole and radiation subsystems for a doubly holographic model,

    A. Bhattacharya, A. Bhattacharyya, P. Nandy, and A. K. Patra, “Islands and complexity of eternal black hole and radiation subsystems for a doubly holographic model,” JHEP05, 135 (2021) arXiv:2103.15852

    2021 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Partial islands and subregion complexity in geometric secret-sharing model,

    A. Bhattacharya, A. Bhattacharyya, P. Nandy, and A. K. Patra, “Partial islands and subregion complexity in geometric secret-sharing model,” JHEP12, 091 (2021) arXiv:2109.07842

    2021 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Bath deformations, islands, and holographic complexity,

    A. Bhattacharya, A. Bhattacharyya, P. Nandy, and Ayan K. Patra, “Bath deformations, islands, and holographic complexity,” Phys. Rev. D105, 066019 (2022) arXiv:2112.06967

    2022 arXiv

  39. [47]

    AdS/BCFT and Island for curvature-squared gravity,

    Q. Hu, D. Li, R. Miao, and Y. Zeng, “AdS/BCFT and Island for curvature-squared gravity,” JHEP 09, 037 (2022) arXiv:2202.03304

    2022 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Island on codimension-two branes in AdS/dCFT,

    P. Hu, D. Li, and R. Miao, “Island on codimension-two branes in AdS/dCFT,” JHEP11, 008 (2022) arXiv: 2208.11982

    2022 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Entanglement island versus massless gravity,

    R. Miao, “Entanglement island versus massless gravity,” Eur.Phys.J.C84, 123 (2024) arXiv:2212.07645

    2024 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Entanglement island and Page curve in wedge holographym

    R, Miao, “Entanglement island and Page curve in wedge holographym” JHEP03, 214 (2023) arXiv:2301.06285

    2023 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Massless entanglement islands in cone holography,

    D. Li and R Miao, “Massless entanglement islands in cone holography,” JHEP06, 056 (2023) arXiv:2303.10958

    2023 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Page curves on codim-m and charged branes,

    Y. Guo and R. Miao, “Page curves on codim-m and charged branes,” Eur.Phys.J.C83, 847 (2023)

    2023

  45. [53]

    Islands for entanglement negativity,

    J. K. Basak, D. Basu, V. Malvimat, H. Parihar, and G. Sengupta, “Islands for entanglement negativity,” SciPost Phys.12, 003 (2022) arXiv:2012.03983

    2022 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Islands for Entanglement Negativity in Communicating Black Holes,

    M. Afrasiar, J. K. Basak, A. Chandra, and G. Sengupta, “Islands for Entanglement Negativity in Communicating Black Holes,” arXiv:2205.07903

    arXiv

  47. [55]

    Negativity spectra in random tensor networks and holography,

    J. K.-Flam, V. Narovlansky, and S. Ryu, “Negativity spectra in random tensor networks and holography,” JHEP 02,076 (2022) arXiv:2109.02649

    2022 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Defect extremal surfaces for entanglement negativity,

    D. Basu, H. Parihar, V. Raj, and G. Sengupta, “Defect extremal surfaces for entanglement negativity,” Phys. Rev. D108, 106005 (2023) arXiv:2205.07905

    2023 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Entanglement negativity and defect extremal surface,

    Y. Shao, M. Yuan, and Yang Zhou, “Entanglement negativity and defect extremal surface,” SciPost Phys. Core7, 027 (2024) arXiv:2206.05951

    2024 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Reflected Entropy for an Evaporating Black Hole,

    T. Li, J. Chu, and Y. Zhou, “Reflected Entropy for an Evaporating Black Hole,” JHEP11, 155 (2020) arXiv:2006.10846. – 40 –

    2020 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Defect extremal surface for reflected entropy,

    T. Li, M. K. Yuan, and Y. Zhou, “Defect extremal surface for reflected entropy,” JHEP01, 018 (2022) arXiv:2108.08544

    2022 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Transcending the ensemble: baby universes, spacetime wormholes, and the order and disorder of black hole information,

    D. Marolf and H. Maxfield, “Transcending the ensemble: baby universes, spacetime wormholes, and the order and disorder of black hole information,” JHEP08, 044 (2020) arXiv:2002.08950

    2020 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Simple holographic models of black hole evaporation,

    C. Akers, N. Engelhardt and D. Harlow, “Simple holographic models of black hole evaporation,” JHEP 08 032 (2020) arXiv:1910.00972

    2020 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Baby Universes, Holography, and the Swampland,

    J. McNamara and C. Vafa, “Baby Universes, Holography, and the Swampland,” arXiv:2004.06738

    2004 arXiv

  55. [63]

    A comment on a fine-grained description of evaporating black holes with baby universes,

    N. Iizuka, A. Miyata, and Tomonori Ugajin, “A comment on a fine-grained description of evaporating black holes with baby universes,” JHEP09, 158 (2022) arXiv:2111.07107

    2022 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Baby universes, ensemble averages and factorizations with matters,

    C. Peng, J. Tian, and J. Yu, “Baby universes, ensemble averages and factorizations with matters,” arXiv:2111.14856

    arXiv

  57. [65]

    Disorder averaging and its UV discontents,

    J. J. Heckman, A. P. Turner, and X. Yu “Disorder averaging and its UV discontents,” Phys.Rev.D 105 086021 (2022) arXiv:2111.06404

    2022 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Wormhole calculus, replicas, and entropies,

    S. B. Giddings, G. J. Turiaci, “Wormhole calculus, replicas, and entropies,” JHEP09, 194 (2020) arXiv:2004.02900

    2020 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Observations of Hawking radiation: the Page curve and baby universes,

    D. Marolf and H. Maxfield, “Observations of Hawking radiation: the Page curve and baby universes,” JHEP 04, 272 (2021) arXiv:2010.06602

    2021 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Bra-ket wormholes in gravitationally prepared states,

    Y. Chen, V. Gorbenko, and J. Maldacena, “Bra-ket wormholes in gravitationally prepared states,” JHEP 02 009 (2021) arXiv:2007.16091

    2021 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Four coupled SYK models and nearly AdS2 gravities: phase transitions in traversable wormholes and in bra-ket wormholes,

    T. Numasawa, “Four coupled SYK models and nearly AdS2 gravities: phase transitions in traversable wormholes and in bra-ket wormholes,” Class. Quant. Grav.39, 084001 (2022) arXiv:2011.12962

    2022 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Entanglement Entropy in a Holographic Moving Mirror and the Page Curve,

    I. Akal, Y. Kusuki, N. Shiba, T. Takayanagi, and Z. Wei, “Entanglement Entropy in a Holographic Moving Mirror and the Page Curve,” Phys.Rev.Lett. 126 (2021)6, 061604 arXiv:2011.12005

    2021 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Moving Mirrors, Page Curves, and Bulk Entropies in AdS2,

    I. A. Reyes, “Moving Mirrors, Page Curves, and Bulk Entropies in AdS2,” Phys.Rev.Lett. 127 (2021) 5, 051602 arXiv:2103.01230

    2021 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Replica wormhole and information retrieval in the SYK model coupled to Majorana chains,

    Y. Chen, X. Qi, and P. Zhang, “Replica wormhole and information retrieval in the SYK model coupled to Majorana chains,” JHEP06, (2020) 121 arXiv:2003.13147

    2020 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Wormholes without averaging,

    P. Saad, S. H. Shenker, D. Stanford, and S. Yao “Wormholes without averaging,” JHEP09, 133 (2024) arXiv:2103.16754

    2024 arXiv

  66. [74]

    The Entanglement Wedge of Unknown Couplings,

    A. Almheiri and H. Lin, “The Entanglement Wedge of Unknown Couplings,” JHEP08, 062 (2022) arXiv:2111.06298

    2022 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Note on entropy dynamics in the Brownian SYK model,

    S. Jian and B. Swingle, “Note on entropy dynamics in the Brownian SYK model,” JHEP03, 042 (2021) arXiv:2011.08158

    2021 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Time dependent Entanglement Entropy in SYK models and Page Curve,

    D. L. Nedel, “Time dependent Entanglement Entropy in SYK models and Page Curve,” Phys.Lett.B 817, (2021) 136340 arXiv:2007.06770

    2021 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Probing Hawking radiation through capacity of entanglement,

    K. Kawabata, T. Nishioka, Y. Okuyamaa and K. Watanabe, “Probing Hawking radiation through capacity of entanglement,” JHEP05, 062 (2021) arXiv:2102.02425. – 41 –

    2021 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Replica wormholes and capacity of entanglement,

    K. Kawabata, T. Nishioka, Y. Okuyamaa and K. Watanabe, “Replica wormholes and capacity of entanglement,” JHEP10, 227 (2021) arXiv:2105.08396

    2021 arXiv

  71. [80]

    Hawking radiation correlations of evaporating black holes in JT gravity,

    T. J. Hollowood, S. P. Kumar, and A. Legramandi, “Hawking radiation correlations of evaporating black holes in JT gravity,” J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.53, 475401 (2020) arXiv:2007.04877

    2020 arXiv

  72. [81]

    Island in the Presence of Higher Derivative Terms,

    M. Alishahiha, A. Faraji Astaneh, and A. Naseh, “Island in the Presence of Higher Derivative Terms,” JHEP 02, 035 (2021) arXiv:2005.08715

    2021 arXiv

  73. [82]

    Page curve from defect extremal surface and island in higher dimensions,

    J. Chu, F. Deng, and Y. Zhou, “Page curve from defect extremal surface and island in higher dimensions,” JHEP 10, 149 (2021) arXiv:2105.09106

    2021 arXiv

  74. [83]

    Partial reduction and cosmology at defect brane,

    Z Wang, Z. Xu, S. Zhou, and Y. Zhou, “Partial reduction and cosmology at defect brane,” JHEP 05, 049 (2022) arXiv:2112.13782

    2022 arXiv

  75. [84]

    JT gravity from partial reduction and defect extremal surface,

    F. Deng, Y. An, and Y. Zhou, “JT gravity from partial reduction and defect extremal surface,” JHEP 02, 219 (2023) arXiv:2206.09609

    2023 arXiv

  76. [85]

    End of the world brane meetsT ¯T,

    F. Deng, Z. Wang, and Y. Zhou, “End of the world brane meetsT ¯T,” JHEP 07, 036 (2024) arXiv:2310.15031

    2024 arXiv

  77. [86]

    Islands in Schwarzschild black holes,

    K. Hashimoto, N. Iizuka and Y. Matsuo, “Islands in Schwarzschild black holes,” JHEP06, 085 (2020) arXiv:2004.05863

    2020 arXiv

  78. [87]

    Islands and Page curves of Reissner-Nrdstr¨om black holes,

    X. Wang, R. Li and J. Wang, “Islands and Page curves of Reissner-Nrdstr¨om black holes,” JHEP 04, 103 (2021) arXiv:2101.06867

    2021 arXiv

  79. [88]

    Islands for black holes in a hybrid quantum state,

    Y. Potaux, D. Sarkar and S. N. Solodukhin, “Islands for black holes in a hybrid quantum state,” arXiv:2411.09574

    arXiv

  80. [89]

    Replica analysis of entanglement properties,

    A. Shekar and M. Taylor, “Replica analysis of entanglement properties,” arXiv:2410.07312

    arXiv

  81. [90]

    Finite entangling regions and information paradox in charged black holes,

    A. I. Belokon, “Finite entangling regions and information paradox in charged black holes,” arXiv:2409.01409

    arXiv

  82. [91]

    Entanglement entropy analysis of dyonic black holes using doubly holographic theory,

    H. Jeong, K. Kim, and Y. Sun, “Entanglement entropy analysis of dyonic black holes using doubly holographic theory,” arXiv:2305.18122

    arXiv

  83. [92]

    Reflected Entropy in Double Holography,

    Y. Ling, P. Liu, Y. Liu, C. Niu, Z. Xian, and C. Zhang, “Reflected Entropy in Double Holography,” JHEP 02, 037 (2022). arXiv:2109.09243

    2022 arXiv

  84. [93]

    Black holes Entangled by Radiation,

    Y. Liu, Z. Xian, C. Peng, and Y. Ling, “Black holes Entangled by Radiation,” JHEP09, 179 (2022) arXiv:2205.14596

    2022 arXiv

  85. [94]

    Entanglement of defect subregions in double holography,

    Y. Liu, Q. Chen, Y. Ling, C. Pend, Y. Tian, and Z. Xian, “Entanglement of defect subregions in double holography,” arXiv:2312.08025

    arXiv

  86. [95]

    Entanglement inside a black hole before the Page time,

    Y. Liu, S. Jian, Y. Ling, Z. Xian, “Entanglement inside a black hole before the Page time,” arXiv:2401.04706

    arXiv

  87. [96]

    Island of Reissner-Nordstr¨om anti-de Sitter black holes in the large d limit,

    C. Tong, D. Du, and J. Sun, “Island of Reissner-Nordstr¨om anti-de Sitter black holes in the large d limit,” Phys. Rev. D109, 104053 arXiv:2306.06682

    arXiv

  88. [97]

    Graviton Mass and Entanglement Islands in Low Spacetime Dimensions,

    H. Geng, “Graviton Mass and Entanglement Islands in Low Spacetime Dimensions,” arXiv:2312.13336. – 42 –

  89. [98]

    Inconsistency of islands in theories with long-range gravity,

    H. Geng, A. Karch, C. Perez-Pardavila, S. Raju, L. Randall, M. Riojas and S. Shashi, “Inconsistency of islands in theories with long-range gravity,” JHEP01, 182 (2022) arXiv:2107.03390

    2022 arXiv

  90. [99]

    Information paradox and its resolution in de Sitter holography,

    H. Geng, Y. Nomura and H. Y. Sun, “Information paradox and its resolution in de Sitter holography,” Phys. Rev. D103, no.12, 126004 (2021)

    2021

  91. [100]

    Islands and Page curves in charged dilaton black holes,

    M. Yu and X. Ge, “Islands and Page curves in charged dilaton black holes,” Eur. Phys. J. C 82, no.1, 14 (2022) arXiv:2107.03031

    2022 arXiv

  92. [101]

    Island, Page curve, and superradiance of rotating BTZ black holes,

    M. Yu, C. Lu, X. Ge and S. Sin, “Island, Page curve, and superradiance of rotating BTZ black holes,” Phys. Rev. D105, no.6, 066009 (2022) arXiv:2112.14361

    2022 arXiv

  93. [102]

    Page curves for accelerating black holes,

    M. Yu, X. Ge, C. Lu, “Page curves for accelerating black holes,” Eur.Phys.J.C83, (2023) 12 arXiv:2306.11407

    2023 arXiv

  94. [103]

    Entanglement Entropy, Phase Transition, and Island Rule for Reissner-Nordstr¨om-AdS Black Holes,

    S. Lin, M. Yu, X. Ge, and L. Tian, “Entanglement Entropy, Phase Transition, and Island Rule for Reissner-Nordstr¨om-AdS Black Holes,” Phys. Rev. D110, 046008 (2024) arXiv: 2405.06873

    2024 arXiv

  95. [104]

    Geometric Constraints via Page Curves: Insights from Island Rule and Quantum Focusing Conjecture,

    M. Yu and X. Ge, “Geometric Constraints via Page Curves: Insights from Island Rule and Quantum Focusing Conjecture,” arXiv:2405.03220

    arXiv

  96. [105]

    Entanglement islands and cutoff branes from path-integral optimization,

    A. Chandra, Z. Li, and Q. Wen, “Entanglement islands and cutoff branes from path-integral optimization,” JHEP 07, 069 (2024) arXiv:2402.15836

    2024 arXiv

  97. [106]

    Entanglement islands in higher dimensions,

    A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan and J. E. Santos, “Entanglement islands in higher dimensions,” SciPost Phys. 9, no.1, 001 (2020) arXiv:1911.09666

    2020 arXiv

  98. [107]

    The universality of islands outside the horizon,

    S. He, Y. Sun, L. Zhao and Y. X. Zhang, “The universality of islands outside the horizon,” JHEP 05, 047 (2022) arXiv:2110.07598

    2022 arXiv

  99. [108]

    Page curve of effective Hawking radiation,

    C. Chou, H. Lao, and Y. Yang, “Page curve of effective Hawking radiation,” Phys. Rev. D 106, no.6, 066008 (2022) arXiv:2111.14551

    2022 arXiv

  100. [109]

    Islands in charged linear dilaton black holes,

    B. Ahn, S. Bak, H. Jeong, K. Y. Kim and Y. W. Sun, “Islands in charged linear dilaton black holes,” Phys. Rev. D105, 046012 (2022) arXiv:2107.07444

    2022 arXiv

  101. [110]

    Island formula in Planck brane,

    J. Chang, S. He, Y. Liu and L. Zhao, “Island formula in Planck brane,” JHEP11, 006 (2023) arXiv:2308.03645

    2023 arXiv

  102. [111]

    Page transition as a phase transition in approximate quantum error correction,

    H. Zhong, “Page transition as a phase transition in approximate quantum error correction,” arXiv:2408.15104

    arXiv

  103. [112]

    Partial entanglement entropy threads in island phase,

    Q. Wen, M. Xu and H. Zhong, “Partial entanglement entropy threads in island phase,” arXiv:2408.13535

    arXiv

  104. [113]

    Non-extremal Island in de Sitter Gravity,

    P. X. Hao, T. Kawamoto, S. M. Ruan and T. Takayanagi, “Non-extremal Island in de Sitter Gravity,” arXiv:2407.21617

    arXiv

  105. [114]

    Universal structure of islands in evaporating black holes,

    Y. Matsuo, “Universal structure of islands in evaporating black holes,” arXiv:2407.20921

    arXiv

  106. [115]

    Kaluza-Klein discreteness of the entropy: Symmetrical bath and CFT subsystem,

    H. Singh, “Kaluza-Klein discreteness of the entropy: Symmetrical bath and CFT subsystem,” arXiv:2407.13447

    arXiv

  107. [116]

    Entanglement islands and the Page curve of Hawking radiation for rotating Kerr black holes,

    L. Wang and R. Li, “Entanglement islands and the Page curve of Hawking radiation for rotating Kerr black holes,” Phys. Rev. D110, no.6, 066012 (2024) arXiv:2406.13949

    2024 arXiv

  108. [117]

    Entanglement island and Page curve for one-sided charged black hole,

    Y. F. Qu, Y. L. Lan, H. Yu, W. C. Gan and F. W. Shu, “Entanglement island and Page curve for one-sided charged black hole,” JHEP08, 023 (2024) arXiv:2405.16457. – 43 –

    2024 arXiv

  109. [118]

    Islands Far Outside the Horizon,

    R. Bousso and G. Penington, “Islands Far Outside the Horizon,” JHEP11, 164 (2024) arXiv:2312.03078

    2024 arXiv

  110. [119]

    Quantum focusing conjecture in two-dimensional evaporating black holes,

    A. Ishibashi, Y. Matsuo and A. Tanaka, “Quantum focusing conjecture in two-dimensional evaporating black holes,” JHEP09, 126 (2024) arXiv:2403.19136

    2024 arXiv

  111. [120]

    Role of mutual information in the Page curve,

    A. R. Chowdhury, A. Saha and S. Gangopadhyay, “Role of mutual information in the Page curve,” Phys. Rev. D106,086019 (2022) arXiv:2207.13029

    2022 arXiv

  112. [121]

    Gravity/ensemble duality,

    R. Bousso and E. Wildenhain, “Gravity/ensemble duality,” Phys. Rev. D 102, 066005 (2020) arXiv:2006.16289

    2020 arXiv

  113. [122]

    Quantum information measurements for Garfinkle-Horne dilaton black holes,

    X. Ge and Y. Shen, “Quantum information measurements for Garfinkle-Horne dilaton black holes,” Chin. Phys. Lett.21, (2004) 1413-1416

    2004

  114. [123]

    Teleportation in the background of Schwarzschild space-time,

    X. Ge and Y. Shen, “Teleportation in the background of Schwarzschild space-time,” Phys. Lett. B 606 (2005) 184-188

    2005

  115. [124]

    On Measures of Entropy and Information

    A. Rényi, et al. “On Measures of Entropy and Information”, Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Volume 1: Contributions to the Theory of Statistics, (University of California Press, Berkeley, California, 20 June-30 July 1961)...

    1961

  116. [125]

    A holographic proof of Rényi entropic inequalities,

    Y. Nakaguchi and T. Nishioka, “A holographic proof of Rényi entropic inequalities,” JHEP 12, 129 (2016) arXiv:1606.08443

    2016 arXiv

  117. [126]

    Entanglement entropy and entanglement spectrum of the Kitaev model,

    H. Yao and X. Qi, “Entanglement entropy and entanglement spectrum of the Kitaev model,” Phys. Rev. Lett.105 080501 (2010) arXiv:1001.1165

    2010 arXiv

  118. [127]

    Capacity of entanglement and volume law,

    M. R. M. Mozaffar, “Capacity of entanglement and volume law,” JHEP09, 068 (2024) arXiv:2407.16028

    2024 arXiv

  119. [128]

    Capacity of entanglement for scalar fields in squeezed states,

    M. R. M. Mozaffar, “Capacity of entanglement for scalar fields in squeezed states,” Phys.Rev.D 110, 4, 046021 (2024) arXiv:2405.09128

    2024 arXiv

  120. [129]

    Capacity of entanglement in local operators,

    P. Nandy, “Capacity of entanglement in local operators,” JHEP07, 019 (2021) arXiv:2106.00228

    2021 arXiv

  121. [130]

    Eigenstate capacity and Page curve in fermionic Gaussian states,

    B. Bhattacharjee, P. Nandy, and T. Pathak, “Eigenstate capacity and Page curve in fermionic Gaussian states,” Phys.Rev.B104, 21, 214306 (2021) arXiv: 2109.00557

    2021 arXiv

  122. [131]

    The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,

    J. Maldacena, “The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,” Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38, 1113-1133 (1999) arXiv:hep-th/9711200

    1999 arXiv

  123. [132]

    The Gravity Dual of Renyi Entropy,

    X. Dong, “The Gravity Dual of Renyi Entropy,” Nature Commun.7 (2016), 12472 arXiv:1601.06788

    2016 arXiv

  124. [133]

    Holography and the Page curve of an evaporating black hole,

    A. A. Khodahami, A. Azizi, “Holography and the Page curve of an evaporating black hole,” arXiv:2305.16570

    arXiv

  125. [134]

    Average entropy of a subsystem,

    D. Page, “Average entropy of a subsystem,” Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 1291-1294 (1993) arXiv:gr-qc/9305007

    1993 arXiv

  126. [135]

    Gravitation and Hamiltonian Structure in Two Space-Time Dimensions,

    C. Teitelboim, “Gravitation and Hamiltonian Structure in Two Space-Time Dimensions,” Phys. Lett. B126, (1983) 41

    1983

  127. [136]

    Lower Dimensional Gravity

    R. Jackiw, “Lower Dimensional Gravity”, Nucl. Phys. B252, (1985) 343

    1985

  128. [137]

    Sharon and D

    E. Sharon and D. Mumford, “2D-shape analysis using conformal mapping, Int. J. Computer Vision 70 (2006) 55. – 44 –

    2006

  129. [138]

    Entanglement and alpha entropies for a massive Dirac field in two dimensions,

    H. Casini, C. D. Fosco and M. Huerta, “Entanglement and alpha entropies for a massive Dirac field in two dimensions,” J. Stat. Mech.0507, P07007, (2005) arXiv:cond-mat/0505563

    2005 arXiv

  130. [139]

    Multiway Junction Conditions for Spacetimes with Multiple Boundaries,

    J. Shen, C. Peng, and L. Li, “Multiway Junction Conditions for Spacetimes with Multiple Boundaries,” Phys. Rev. Lett.133 (2024) 13, 131601

    2024

  131. [140]

    Multiway junction conditions: Booklets and webs,

    J. Shen, C. Peng, and L. Li, “Multiway junction conditions: Booklets and webs,” Phys. Rev. D 110, 066021 (2024) arXiv:2402.00694. – 45 –

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.