Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 4 cited by

Two Micron-Size Dark Dimensions

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that two micron-sized extra dimensions can be consistent with astrophysical, cosmological, and collider data only if the compact two-dimensional space has no continuous isometries, so that Kaluza-Klein gravitons decay…

desk verdict A coherent, genuinely new n=2 dark-dimension scenario with an inverted prefactor in its key fKK integral and a severe, openly admitted fine-tuning cost; worth referee time but needs a corrected quantitative pass. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.11690 v2 pith:KAMUGKFN submitted 2025-01-20 hep-th hep-ph

Luis Anchordoqui , Ignatios Antoniadis , Dieter Lust This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thhep-ph
keywords largeextradimensionsdarkdimensionKaluza-Kleingravitonsintra-towerdecaysno-isometrycompactificationnormalcytemperatureprimordialblackholesspeciesscale
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether two extra dimensions of micron size, which would bring the fundamental scale of gravity to about 10 TeV and could address both the cosmological and electroweak hierarchy problems, survive existing observations. The answer it defends is conditional: the two-dimensional compact space must admit no continuous isometries, so that the extra-dimensional momentum is not conserved and massive Kaluza-Klein gravitons can decay into lighter graviton modes within the same tower. With that condition, the supernova and neutron-star limits that would otherwise force the extra dimensions to be much smaller are relaxed, and the scenario becomes consistent with collider searches. The remaining price is cosmological: the temperature at which the universe becomes radiation-dominated must be tuned to about 2.15 MeV, close to the lowest reheating temperature allowed by big bang nucleosynthesis and cosmic microwave background data. The paper also shows that, within this tuned scenario, primordial black holes in the mass range $10^{8}$ to $10^{21}$ grams could constitute all of the dark matter.

What carries the argument

The central object is the compact two-dimensional extra-dimensional space, assumed to have no continuous symmetry (isometry), so that the Kaluza-Klein momentum quantum number is not conserved and the graviton tower is unstable. The carrying mechanism is the intra-tower decay of gravitons: a KK mode of mass $m_l$ decays gravitationally into two lighter modes with partial width $\Gamma \sim m_l^3/M_p^2$, and summing over the available channels gives a total width $\Gamma_{\rm tot} \sim \beta^2 \delta^{3/2} m_l^{7/2}/(M_p^2 m_{KK}^{1/2})$, where $\beta$ encodes the decay-amplitude strength and $\delta$ the small violation of the KK quantum number. This formula implies the mass of the heaviest dark graviton surviving at time $t$ falls as $m_l(t) \sim (M_p^4 m_{KK}/(\beta^4 \delta^3))^{1/7} t^{-2/7}$, which the paper uses to compute a suppression factor $f_{KK} \sim 881$ that rescales the supernova and neutron-star bounds on the species scale from 34-36 TeV down to 6.2-6.6 TeV. The extension to two dimensions rests on the observation that energy conservation forces the daughter momenta to be nearly parallel, so the effective number of decay channels remains one-dimensional up to a width set by $\delta$.

What would settle it

A direct computation of the two-body decay phase space in two compact dimensions could show that the number of available decay channels does not grow as assumed, changing $f_{KK}$ and restoring the 34-36 TeV bounds; or a no-go argument could prove that every two-dimensional compactification with a consistent string vacuum admits a continuous isometry, which would invalidate the central escape route.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that consistency with astrophysical observations requires two extra dimensions of micron scale to admit no isometries. When the compact space has no continuous isometries, Kaluza-Klein momentum is violated, and a massive graviton mode can decay into pairs of lighter graviton modes; the resulting intra-tower cascade removes the KK modes that would otherwise decay to photons and heat neutron stars, evading the radiative-decay bounds. With this escape route, the relevant limits reduce to the supernova energy-loss bound, leaving a species scale of about 10 TeV consistent with collider null results. Cosmological consistency then singles out a normalcy temperature of about 2.15 MeV, and if one accepts that fine-tuning, six-dimensional primordial black holes with masses between $10^{8}$ and $10^{21}$ grams can provide all of the dark matter.

Load-bearing premise

The whole scenario rests on the assumption that a two-dimensional compact space of micron size with no continuous isometries exists in a consistent ultraviolet completion, and that the intra-tower decay width formulas (17)-(18), derived for one extra dimension, apply unchanged to n=2 with $\beta = \delta = 1$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the no-isometry condition holds, the two-dark-dimension scenario with species scale $\Lambda_{\rm sp} \sim 10$ TeV is not excluded by existing collider searches, and future hadron colliders around this energy could probe it directly through KK graviton and string resonance production.
  • The required normalcy temperature $T_* \sim 2.15$ MeV sits just above the $\sim 1.8$ MeV lower bound from neutrino thermalization, so modestly stronger cosmological constraints on the effective number of relativistic species or on BBN could push the two-dimension scenario out.
  • Dark matter made entirely of six-dimensional primordial black holes opens the mass window $10^8 \lesssim M_{\rm BH}/{\rm g} \lesssim 10^{21}$, extending the viable four-dimensional PBH window downward by several orders of magnitude, with the upper part of this window testable by X-ray pulsar microlensing.
  • If KK-graviton emission from the electromagnetic cascade of ultra-high-energy cosmic rays is responsible for the observed muon excess in air showers, full-scale simulations that include this process should reproduce both the muon excess and the deeper atmospheric depth of shower maximum reported by cosmic-ray observatories.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's n=2 phase-space argument is qualitative: the claim that the decay spectrum remains effectively one-dimensional because daughter momenta are near-parallel has not been demonstrated by an explicit two-body phase-space integral, and a quantitative computation could shift the numerical factor $f_{KK}$ and hence the 6.2-6.6 TeV bounds.
  • If the no-isometry requirement is taken seriously, the compact space cannot be a flat torus, so the setup must generalize to a space with nontrivial topology such as a higher-genus surface; this would in turn modify neutrino-tower mixing and axion wavefunction suppression, which the paper mentions only in passing.
  • The same early-universe overproduction that forces $T_* \approx 2.15$ MeV would also apply to any relic primordial black hole abundance, so the PBH all-dark-matter option deepens the required fine-tuning rather than removing it.
  • A definitive test could come from next-generation cosmic microwave background experiments: if the lower bound on the reheating temperature is pushed above about 2.2 MeV, the two-dimension scenario is excluded while the single-dark-dimension scenario with $T_*$ near 1 GeV remains unaffected.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper examines whether two large extra dimensions of micron size, as suggested by the dark dimension scenario, can be made consistent with laboratory and astrophysical constraints. The core proposal is that the compact two-dimensional space must admit no isometries, so that Kaluza-Klein momentum is not conserved and massive graviton KK modes can decay into lighter KK modes within the same tower. This intra-tower decay is invoked to evade the strongest bounds from supernova energy loss, neutron star heating, and diffuse gamma-ray observations. The authors then study cosmological constraints, fixing the normalcy temperature at T* ~ 2.15 MeV, discuss sterile-neutrino parameter space, revisit bulk neutrino towers, and argue that six-dimensional primordial black holes with masses 10^8 g to 10^21 g could constitute all dark matter. They also conjecture that KK graviton emission in air showers might explain the muon excess at ultra-high energies. The central quantitative result is the suppression factor fKK of Eqs. (21)-(25), which the paper evaluates as fKK ~ 881 and uses to rescale the neutron-star and diffuse-flux bounds, concluding that RKK ~ 1 micron is consistent with all astrophysical constraints.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, the paper opens a plausible window for a two-dark-dimension scenario with a species scale Lambda_sp ~ 10 TeV, which would be testable at the FCC-hh and would connect the dark dimension to the electroweak hierarchy. The paper is also valuable for collecting and organizing current collider, astrophysical, and cosmological constraints in one place. It explicitly flags the fine-tuning of the normalcy temperature and the caveat that PBH dark matter exacerbates this tuning, which is commendable. However, the quantitative consistency argument hinges on a single numerical factor and on the transfer of a one-dimensional decay formula to two dimensions; both points are load-bearing. The paper does not provide a machine-checked derivation or a fully constructed compactification, so the strength of the conclusion rests on the validity of the n=1-to-n=2 extrapolation. These issues must be resolved before the claimed consistency can be regarded as established.

major comments (3)
  1. The prefactor in Eq. (25) is incorrect. Substituting Eq. (18) into Eq. (22) with beta = delta = 1 gives Gamma0/Gamma(t) = (m0/m_l(t))^3 = m0^3 (M_p^4 m_KK)^{-3/7} t^{6/7}, so the time average over the neutron-star lifetime is (7/13) tau_NS^{6/7} times the constant factor, not (13/7) tau_NS^{6/7}. The stated value fKK ~ 881 should therefore be fKK ~ 255, a reduction by a factor (7/13)^2. Since the bounds in Eqs. (27) and (28) scale as fKK^{-1/4}, they increase by a factor (13/7)^{1/2} ~ 1.36, giving approximately 8.5 TeV and 9.0 TeV respectively. The latter is essentially equal to the supernova energy-loss bound of 8.9 TeV in Eq. (9), so the conclusion that RKK ~ 1 micron is comfortably consistent with astrophysical data is not supported by the corrected numbers. This is a load-bearing error in the central consistency argument.
  2. The intra-tower decay width and resulting mass evolution, Eqs. (17) and (18), are derived for n = 1 in the cited literature. The extension to n = 2 is asserted via the statement that conservation of energy forces the momenta of the decay products to be almost parallel, so that the available phase space is effectively one-dimensional. This is a qualitative argument and no explicit n = 2 phase-space computation is given. Since Eq. (18) enters directly into the suppression factor fKK and hence into the main astrophysical conclusion, the paper needs either a concrete derivation of the n = 2 decay width and the resulting mass evolution, or a clear discussion of how the parametric dependence could change and why the n = 1 result remains a valid approximation. Without this, the claimed evasion of the neutron-star and gamma-ray bounds is not fully established.
  3. The parameters beta and delta are set to unity without justification or sensitivity analysis. These parameters control the intra-tower decay amplitude and the degree of KK momentum violation, respectively, and the paper itself notes (following the discussion of Ref. [97]) that the allowed region in the (lambda_tilde, delta, beta) parameter space leads to larger values of fKK. Since fKK scales as beta^{-12/7} delta^{-9/7} through Eq. (18), the numerical bounds in Eqs. (27) and (28) depend sensitively on these choices. The paper should state whether beta = 1 and delta = 1 are conservative, fiducial, or optimistic values, and quantify how the final bounds shift over the allowed parameter range.
minor comments (4)
  1. There is a typo in the phrase "definine the volume" in the paragraph after Eq. (8); it should read "define the volume".
  2. The phrase "the the late-time entropy production" contains a duplicated article and should be corrected.
  3. The Affleck-Dine mechanism is misspelled as "Afleck-Dine" in the introduction to Sec. VI; please correct the spelling.
  4. The discussion of the lower bound on the normalcy temperature is somewhat compressed; it would benefit from a statement that the quoted T* ~ 2.15 MeV is the value that saturates the dark-matter overclosure bound, and how the bound from Eq. (34) is derived from Eq. (31).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity; central constraints come from external bounds and the independent [71] decay mechanism, with only non-load-bearing self-citations in the PBH section.

full rationale

Most of the derivation is self-contained and benchmarked externally. The central astrophysical-consistency claim rests on the intra-tower decay mechanism of [71] (external, not self-cited) and on the Hannestad-Raffelt bounds [65]; the rescaling in Eqs. (19)-(28) is an explicit arithmetic step, not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The normalcy temperature T* ~ 2.15 MeV is taken from [68] and tested against external BBN/CMB constraints, so it is not fitted here. The PBH section cites the authors' own prior work [124-127] for the extension of the PBH dark-matter window, but the decisive quantity tau_BH is re-derived from standard formulas (38)-(41), and the quoted mass range follows from that plus external 4D bounds; the self-citation is contextual, not load-bearing. Two concerns are non-circular: the n=2 use of the n=1 formula (18) is asserted with only a qualitative phase-space argument, a support gap; and Eq. (25) appears to use 13/7 where the integral gives 7/13, which would lower fKK from ~881 to ~255 and raise the neutron-star bounds (27)-(28) to roughly 8.5-9.0 TeV. These affect numerical security, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a specific compactification geometry (no isometries) that is assumed, on the phenomenological parameters beta and delta set to 1, and on the restriction to thermal KK production. The PBH section imports formulas from earlier work by the same authors. No genuinely new entities are postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • beta = 1 (assumed)
    Controls the strength of intra-tower decay amplitudes in Eq. (17); set to unity without independent determination.
  • delta = 1 (assumed)
    Controls the degree of KK momentum violation and the number of decay channels; set to unity in the fKK estimate (Eq. 25).
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The two extra dimensions form a compact space of linear size ~1 micron with no isometries.
    Required to violate KK momentum conservation and enable intra-tower decays; no explicit compactification is constructed (Sec. III).
  • domain assumption SM fields are confined to a 4D brane; only gravity (and possibly right-handed neutrinos) propagate in the bulk.
    Standard large extra dimension setup, invoked throughout and following Ref. [1].
  • ad hoc to paper The intra-tower decay width formula, Eq. (17), and the resulting mass evolution, Eq. (18), valid for n=1, also apply to n=2 with an effectively one-dimensional phase space.
    The n=2 phase space is argued qualitatively in Sec. III, not derived.
  • domain assumption Only thermal production of KK gravitons contributes; non-thermal production from inflaton decay is ignored.
    The paper states in Sec. IV that it accepts this restriction to evade the stronger bound of Ref. [72].
  • domain assumption The normalcy temperature T* ~ 2.15 MeV is compatible with BBN and CMB lower bounds of about 1.8 MeV.
    The paper relies on the lower bound of Ref. [79] while acknowledging the narrowness of the allowed window (Secs. IV and VIII).
  • standard math Standard formulas for higher-dimensional black hole lifetime, Eqs. (38)-(41), apply for PBHs evaporating into brane and bulk modes.
    Used to set the PBH dark matter mass range in Sec. VI; these are textbook higher-dimensional black hole thermodynamics.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Two Micron-Size Dark Dimensions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KAMUGKFN

@misc{pith2026250111690,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Two Micron-Size Dark Dimensions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KAMUGKFN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.11690}
}
abstract

Two extra dimensions of micron scale might simultaneously address the gauge and cosmological hierarchy problems. In our paper we examine various observational bounds in scenarios with one and two large extra dimensions, to see if they are compatible with the micron scale. We show that consistency with astrophysical observations requires that two extra dimensions of micron scale must not admit isometries, whereby conservation of the extra dimensional momentum is violated, allowing the massive Kaluza-Klein modes of the graviton to decay to other lighter graviton modes. However, to remain consistent with cosmological observations two extra dimensions of micron scale require a delicately fine tuning of the temperature at which the universe enters the radiation dominated epoch. Diving into this fine-tuned scenario we also show that primordial black holes with masses in the range $10^8 <M_{\rm BH}/{\rm g} <10^{21}$ could make all cosmological dark matter.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.11690 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. 10￾2 10￾1 100 101 102 ms [keV] 10￾10 10￾8 10￾6 10￾4 10￾2 sin 2 2 ✓ ￾-decay TRISTAN TRISTAN-STAT BeEST CMB HUNTER 1 HUNTER 2 HUNTER 3 MAGNETO-⌫ 1 MAGNETO-⌫ MAGNETO￾2 ⌫ 3 1  Ne↵  3.044 TRH=1.8 MeV " H0 solution 10￾2 10￾1 100 101 102 ms [keV] 10￾10 10￾8 10￾6 10￾4 10￾2 sin 2 2 ✓ ￾-decay TRISTAN TRISTAN-STAT BeEST CMB HUNTER 1 HUNTER 2 HUNTER 3 MAGNETO-⌫ 1 MAGNETO-⌫ MAGNETO￾2 ⌫ 3 1  Ne↵  3.044 TRH=1.8 MeV " H0 soluti… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Feynman diagrams for a bremsstrahlung emission of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. TransPlanckian Censorship on Dark Dimension Inflation

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    TransPlanckian Censorship forces dark-dimension inflation into a narrow one-dimension window with a pre-inflationary phase and suppresses tensor modes to r < 10^-10.

  2. Evolving Dark Sector and the Dark Dimension Scenario

    astro-ph.CO 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A two-parameter fading dark sector model, with exponential dark energy potential and exponential dark matter mass, matches DESI DR2 plus supernova data and naturally yields apparent w<-1 phantom behavior.

  3. Dark Dimension Right-handed Neutrinos Confronted with Long-Baseline Oscillation Experiments

    hep-ph 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    T2K and NOvA data exclude dark-dimension neutrino models with bulk mass |c| < ~0.1 eV for a 10 µm extra dimension.

  4. Breaking Free from the Swampland of Impossible Universes through the DESI Portal

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0 of 10

    DESI data indicating evolving dark energy may allow string theory to describe observed universes without violating swampland constraints on constant dark energy.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

156 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [71]

    Gonzalo, M

    E. Gonzalo, M. Montero, G. Obied and C. Vafa, Dark Dimension Gravitons as Dark Matter, JHEP 11, 109 (2023) doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2023)109 [arXiv:2209.09249 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv 2023

  2. [97]

    Obied, C

    G. Obied, C. Dvorkin, E. Gonzalo and C. Vafa, Dark dimension and decaying dark matter gravi- tons, Phys. Rev. D 109, no.6, 063540 (2024) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.063540 [arXiv:2311.05318 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv 2024

  3. [1]

    Arkani-Hamed, S

    N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos and G. R. Dvali, The Hierarchy problem and new dimensions at a millimeter, Phys. Lett. B 429, 263-272 (1998) doi:10.1016/S0370- 10 2693(98)00466-3 [arXiv:hep-ph/9803315 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv 1998

  4. [2]

    Antoniadis, N

    I. Antoniadis, N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos and G. R. Dvali, New dimensions at a millimeter to a Fermi and superstrings at a TeV, Phys. Lett. B 436, 257-263 (1998) doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(98)00860-0 [arXiv:hep- ph/9804398 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv 1998

  5. [3]

    Dvali, Black holes and large N species solution to the hierarchy problem, Fortsch

    G. Dvali, Black holes and large N species solution to the hierarchy problem, Fortsch. Phys. 58, 528-536 (2010) doi:10.1002/prop.201000009 [arXiv:0706.2050 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2010

  6. [4]

    Dvali and M

    G. Dvali and M. Redi, Black hole bound on the num- ber of species and quantum gravity at LHC, Phys. Rev. D 77, 045027 (2008) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.045027 [arXiv:0710.4344 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2008

  7. [5]

    Dvali and D

    G. Dvali and D. L¨ ust, Evaporation of Micro- scopic Black Holes in String Theory and the Bound on Species, Fortsch. Phys. 58 (2010), 505-527 doi:10.1002/prop.201000008 [arXiv:0912.3167 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2010

  8. [6]

    Dvali and C

    G. Dvali and C. Gomez, Species and Strings, [arXiv:1004.3744 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

Show all 156 references
  1. [7]

    Dvali, C

    G. Dvali, C. Gomez and D. L¨ ust, Black Hole Quan- tum Mechanics in the Presence of Species, Fortsch. Phys. 61 (2013), 768-778 doi:10.1002/prop.201300002 [arXiv:1206.2365 [hep-th]]

    2013 arXiv

  2. [8]

    Vafa, The string landscape and the swampland, [arXiv:hep-th/0509212 [hep-th]]

    C. Vafa, The string landscape and the swampland, [arXiv:hep-th/0509212 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  3. [9]

    Palti, The swampland: introduction and re- view, Fortsch

    E. Palti, The swampland: introduction and re- view, Fortsch. Phys. 67, no.6, 1900037 (2019) doi:10.1002/prop.201900037 [arXiv:1903.06239 [hep- th]]

    2019 arXiv

  4. [10]

    van Beest, J

    M. van Beest, J. Calder´ on-Infante, D. Mirfend- ereski and I. Valenzuela, Lectures on the Swamp- land Program in string compactifications, Phys. Rept. 989, 1-50 (2022) doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2022.09.002 [arXiv:2102.01111 [hep-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  5. [11]

    N. B. Agmon, A. Bedroya, M. J. Kang and C. Vafa, Lectures on the string landscape and the swampland, [arXiv:2212.06187 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  6. [12]

    Ooguri and C

    H. Ooguri and C. Vafa, On the Geometry of the String Landscape and the Swampland, Nucl. Phys. B 766, 21-33 (2007) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2006.10.033 [arXiv:hep-th/0605264 [hep-th]]

    2007 arXiv

  7. [13]

    L¨ ust, E

    D. L¨ ust, E. Palti and C. Vafa, AdS and the Swampland, Phys. Lett. B 797, 134867 (2019) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.134867 [arXiv:1906.05225 [hep-th]]

    2019

  8. [14]

    Higuchi, Forbidden mass range for spin-2 field theory in de Sitter space-time, Nucl

    A. Higuchi, Forbidden mass range for spin-2 field theory in de Sitter space-time, Nucl. Phys. B 282 (1987), 397- 436 doi:10.1016/0550-3213(87)90691-2

    1987 doi

  9. [15]

    Montero, C

    M. Montero, C. Vafa and I. Valenzuela, The dark di- mension and the Swampland, JHEP 02, 022 (2023) doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2023)022 [arXiv:2205.12293 [hep- th]]

    2023 arXiv

  10. [16]

    Itoyama and T

    H. Itoyama and T. R. Taylor, Supersymmetry restora- tion in the compactified O(16) × O(16)-prime het- erotic string theory, Phys. Lett. B 186 (1987), 129-133 doi:10.1016/0370-2693(87)90267-X

    1987 doi

  11. [17]

    Itoyama and T

    H. Itoyama and T. R. Taylor, Small cosmological con- stant in string models, FERMILAB-CONF-87-129-T

  12. [18]

    Antoniadis and C

    I. Antoniadis and C. Kounnas, Superstring phase tran- sition at high temperature, Phys. Lett. B 261 (1991), 369-378 doi:10.1016/0370-2693(91)90442-S

    1991 doi

  13. [19]

    Bonnefoy, E

    Q. Bonnefoy, E. Dudas and S. L¨ ust, On the weak gravity conjecture in string theory with broken su- persymmetry, Nucl. Phys. B 947 (2019), 114738 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2019.114738 [arXiv:1811.11199 [hep-th]]

    2019

  14. [20]

    C. P. Burgess and F. Quevedo, Perils of towers in the swamp: dark dimensions and the robustness of EFTs, JHEP 09 (2023), 159 doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2023)159 [arXiv:2304.03902 [hep-th]]

    2023 arXiv

  15. [21]

    Branchina, V

    C. Branchina, V. Branchina, F. Contino and A. Pernace, Does the Cosmological Constant re- ally indicate the existence of a Dark Dimension?, doi:10.1142/S0219887824503055 [arXiv:2308.16548 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  16. [22]

    L. A. Anchordoqui, I. Antoniadis, D. L¨ ust and S. L¨ ust, On the cosmological constant, the KK mass scale, and the cut-off dependence in the dark dimension scenario, Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (2023) no.11, 1016 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-12206-2 [arXiv:2309.09330 [hep-th]]

    2023 arXiv

  17. [23]

    Branchina, V

    C. Branchina, V. Branchina, F. Contino and A. Pernace, Dark Dimension and the Effective Field Theory limit, doi:10.1142/S0219887824503031 [arXiv:2404.10068 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  18. [24]

    Aoufia, I

    C. Aoufia, I. Basile and G. Leone, Species scale, world- sheet CFTs and emergent geometry, JHEP 12 (2024), 111 doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2024)111 [arXiv:2405.03683 [hep-th]]

    2024 arXiv

  19. [25]

    Basile and D

    I. Basile and D. L¨ ust, Dark dimension with (little) strings attached, [arXiv:2409.12231 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  20. [26]

    J. G. Lee, E. G. Adelberger, T. S. Cook, S. M. Fleischer and B. R. Heckel, New test of the gravitational 1 /r2 law at separations down to 52 µm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, no.10, 101101 (2020) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.101101 [arXiv:2002.11761 [hep-ex]]

    2020 arXiv

  21. [27]

    Aghanim et al

    N. Aghanim et al. [Planck], Planck 2018 re- sults VI: Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astro- phys. 641, A6 (2020) [erratum: Astron. Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)] doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833910 [arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2020 arXiv

  22. [28]

    Abada et al

    A. Abada et al. [FCC], FCC-hh: The Hadron Col- lider (Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Re- port Volume 3), Eur. Phys. J. ST 228, no.4, 755-1107 (2019) doi:10.1140/epjst/e2019-900087-0

    2019 doi

  23. [29]

    Chatrchyan et al

    S. Chatrchyan et al. [CMS], Search for dark matter and large extra dimensions in pp colli- sions yielding a photon and missing transverse energy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 261803 (2012) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.261803 [arXiv:1204.0821 [hep-ex]]

    2012 arXiv

  24. [30]

    Aad et al

    G. Aad et al. [ATLAS], Search for dark matter can- didates and large extra dimensions in events with a photon and missing transverse momentum in pp col- lision data at √s = 7 TeV with the ATLAS de- tector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, no.1, 011802 (2013) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.0...

    2013 arXiv

  25. [31]

    Chatrchyan et al

    S. Chatrchyan et al. [CMS], Search for new physics with a mono-jet and missing transverse energy inpp collisions at √s = 7 TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 201804 (2011) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.201804 [arXiv:1106.4775 [hep-ex]]

    2011 arXiv

  26. [32]

    Aad et al

    G. Aad et al. [ATLAS], Search for new phenom- ena with the monojet and missing transverse mo- mentum signature using the ATLAS detector in√s = 7 TeV proton-proton collisions, Phys. Lett. B 11 705, 294-312 (2011) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2011.10.006 [arXiv:1106.5327 [hep-ex]]

    2011 arXiv

  27. [33]

    Khachatryan et al

    V. Khachatryan et al. [CMS], Search for dark matter, extra dimensions, and unparticles in monojet events in proton–proton collisions at √s = 8 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 75, no.5, 235 (2015) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3451- 4 [arXiv:1408.3583 [hep-ex]]

    2015 arXiv

  28. [34]

    Aad et al

    G. Aad et al. [ATLAS], Search for new phenomena in final states with an energetic jet and large miss- ing transverse momentum in pp collisions at √s =8 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 75, no.7, 299 (2015) [erratum: Eur. Phys. J. C 75, no.9, 408 (2015)] doi:10.1140...

    2015 arXiv

  29. [35]

    Aad et al

    G. Aad et al. [ATLAS], Search for new phenomena in events with an energetic jet and missing transverse momentum in pp collisions at √s =13 TeV with the AT- LAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 103, no.11, 112006 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.112006 [arXiv:2102.10874 [hep-ex]]

    2021 arXiv

  30. [36]

    Tumasyan et al

    A. Tumasyan et al. [CMS], Search for new particles in events with energetic jets and large missing transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV, JHEP 11, 153 (2021) doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2021)153 [arXiv:2107.13021 [hep-ex]]

    2021 arXiv

  31. [37]

    V. M. Abazov et al. [D0], Search for large extra dimen- sions via single photon plus missing energy final states at √s = 1.96-TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 011601 (2008) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.011601 [arXiv:0803.2137 [hep-ex]]

    2008 arXiv

  32. [38]

    Aaltonen et al

    T. Aaltonen et al. [CDF], Search for large extra dimen- sions in final states containing one photon or jet and large missing transverse energy produced in p¯p collisions at √s = 1.96-TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 181602 (2008) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.181602 [arXiv:0807.3132 [hep-ex]]

    2008 arXiv

  33. [39]

    A. M. Sirunyan et al. [CMS], Search for new physics in dijet angular distributions using proton–proton col- lisions at √s = 13 TeV and constraints on dark mat- ter and other models, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, no.9, 789 (2018) [erratum: Eur. Phys. J. C 82, no.4, 379 (2022)] doi:10.114...

    2018 arXiv

  34. [40]

    Aaboud et al

    M. Aaboud et al. [ATLAS], Search for new phe- nomena in high-mass diphoton final states using 37 fb−1 of proton–proton collisions collected at √s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Lett. B 775, 105-125 (2017) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.10.039 [arXiv:1707.04147 [hep-ex]]

    2017 arXiv

  35. [41]

    A. M. Sirunyan et al. [CMS], Search for physics beyond the standard model in high-mass dipho- ton events from proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV, Phys. Rev. D 98, no.9, 092001 (2018) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.092001 [arXiv:1809.00327 [hep-ex]]

    2018 arXiv

  36. [42]

    A. M. Sirunyan et al. [CMS], Search for resonant and nonresonant new phenomena in high-mass dilepton fi- nal states at √s = 13 TeV, JHEP 07, 208 (2021) doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2021)208 [arXiv:2103.02708 [hep- ex]]

    2021 arXiv

  37. [43]

    G. F. Giudice, R. Rattazzi and J. D. Wells, Quan- tum gravity and extra dimensions at high-energy collid- ers, Nucl. Phys. B 544, 3-38 (1999) doi:10.1016/S0550- 3213(99)00044-9 [arXiv:hep-ph/9811291 [hep-ph]]

    1999 arXiv

  38. [44]

    L. A. Anchordoqui, H. Goldberg, S. Nawata and T. R. Taylor, Jet signals for low mass strings at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 171603 (2008) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.171603 [arXiv:0712.0386 [hep-ph]]

    2008 arXiv

  39. [45]

    L. A. Anchordoqui, H. Goldberg, S. Nawata and T. R. Taylor, Direct photons as probes of low mass strings at the CERN LHC, Phys. Rev. D 78, 016005 (2008) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.78.016005 [arXiv:0804.2013 [hep-ph]]

    2008 arXiv

  40. [46]

    L¨ ust, S

    D. L¨ ust, S. Stieberger and T. R. Taylor, The LHC string hunter’s companion, Nucl. Phys. B 808, 1-52 (2009) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2008.09.012 [arXiv:0807.3333 [hep-th]]

    2009 arXiv

  41. [47]

    L. A. Anchordoqui, H. Goldberg, D. L¨ ust, S. Nawata, S. Stieberger and T. R. Taylor, Dijet signals for low mass strings at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 241803 (2008) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.241803 [arXiv:0808.0497 [hep-ph]]

    2008 arXiv

  42. [48]

    L. A. Anchordoqui, H. Goldberg, D. L¨ ust, S. Nawata, S. Stieberger and T. R. Taylor, LHC phenomenology for string hunters, Nucl. Phys. B 821, 181 (2009) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2009.06.023 [arXiv:0904.3547 [hep-ph]]

    2009 arXiv

  43. [49]

    L. A. Anchordoqui, I. Antoniadis, D-C. Dai, W.-Z. Feng, H. Goldberg, X. Huang, D. L¨ ust, D. Sto- jkovic, and T.R. Taylor, String resonances at hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. D 90, no. 6, 066013 (2014) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.066013 [arXiv:1407.8120 [hep-ph]]

    2014 arXiv

  44. [50]

    Khachatryan et al

    V. Khachatryan et al. [CMS], Search for dijet resonances in 7 TeV pp collisions at CMS, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 211801 (2010) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.211801, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.029902 [arXiv:1010.0203 [hep-ex]]

    2010 arXiv

  45. [51]

    Chatrchyan et al

    S. Chatrchyan et al. [CMS], Search for resonances in the dijet mass spectrum from 7 TeV pp col- lisions at CMS, Phys. Lett. B 704, 123 (2011) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2011.09.015 [arXiv:1107.4771 [hep-ex]]

    2011 arXiv

  46. [52]

    Aad et al

    G. Aad et al. [ATLAS], Search for production of res- onant states in the photon-jet mass distribution us- ing pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV collected by the AT- LAS detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 211802 (2012) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.211802 [arXiv:1112.3580 [hep-ex]]

    2012 arXiv

  47. [53]

    Chatrchyan et al

    S. Chatrchyan et al. [CMS], Search for narrow resonances using the dijet mass spectrum in pp collisions at √s=8 TeV, Phys. Rev. D 87, no. 11, 114015 (2013) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.87.114015 [arXiv:1302.4794 [hep-ex]]

    2013 arXiv

  48. [54]

    Aad et al

    G. Aad et al. [ATLAS], Search for new phenomena in photon+jet events collected in proton–proton collisions at √s = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Lett. B 728, 562 (2014) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2013.12.029 [arXiv:1309.3230 [hep-ex]]

    2014 arXiv

  49. [55]

    Khachatryan et al

    V. Khachatryan et al. [CMS], Search for resonances and quantum black holes using dijet mass spectra in proton- proton collisions at √s = 8 TeV, Phys. Rev. D 91, no. 5, 052009 (2015) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.052009 [arXiv:1501.04198 [hep-ex]]

    2015 arXiv

  50. [56]

    Khachatryan et al

    V. Khachatryan et al. [CMS], Search for narrow resonances decaying to dijets in proton-proton colli- sions at √s = 13 TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, no.7, 12 071801 (2016) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.071801 [arXiv:1512.01224 [hep-ex]]

    2016 arXiv

  51. [57]

    A. M. Sirunyan et al. [CMS], Search for dijet reso- nances in proton–proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV and constraints on dark matter and other models, Phys. Lett. B 769, 520-542 (2017) [erratum: Phys. Lett. B 772, 882-883 (2017)] doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.02.012 [arXiv:1611....

    2017 arXiv

  52. [58]

    A. M. Sirunyan et al. [CMS], Search for narrow and broad dijet resonances in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV and constraints on dark matter medi- ators and other new particles, JHEP 08, 130 (2018) doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2018)130 [arXiv:1806.00843 [hep- ex]]

    2018 arXiv

  53. [59]

    A. M. Sirunyan et al. [CMS], Search for high mass dijet resonances with a new background prediction method in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV, JHEP 05, 033 (2020) doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2020)033 [arXiv:1911.03947 [hep-ex]]

    2020 arXiv

  54. [60]

    Arkani-Hamed, S

    N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos and G. R. Dvali, Phenomenology, astrophysics and cosmology of theories with submillimeter dimensions and TeV scale quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D 59, 086004 (1999) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.59.086004 [arXiv:hep- ph/9807344 [hep-ph]]

    1999

  55. [61]

    Cullen and M

    S. Cullen and M. Perelstein, SN1987A constraints on large compact dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 268- 271 (1999) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.268 [arXiv:hep- ph/9903422 [hep-ph]]

    1999

  56. [62]

    V. D. Barger, T. Han, C. Kao and R. J. Zhang, Astrophysical constraints on large extra dimensions, Phys. Lett. B 461, 34-42 (1999) doi:10.1016/S0370- 2693(99)00795-9 [arXiv:hep-ph/9905474 [hep-ph]]

    1999 arXiv

  57. [63]

    Hanhart, D

    C. Hanhart, D. R. Phillips, S. Reddy and M. J. Sav- age, Extra dimensions, SN1987a, and nucleon- nucleon scattering data, Nucl. Phys. B 595, 335-359 (2001) doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(00)00667-2 [arXiv:nucl- th/0007016 [nucl-th]]

    2001

  58. [64]

    Hanhart, J

    C. Hanhart, J. A. Pons, D. R. Phillips and S. Reddy, The likelihood of GODs’ existence: Improving the SN1987a constraint on the size of large compact dimen- sions, Phys. Lett. B 509, 1-9 (2001) doi:10.1016/S0370- 2693(01)00544-5 [arXiv:astro-ph/0102063 [astro-ph]]

    2001 arXiv

  59. [65]

    Hannestad and G

    S. Hannestad and G. G. Raffelt, Supernova and neu- tron star limits on large extra dimensions reexamined, Phys. Rev. D 67, 125008 (2003) [erratum: Phys. Rev. D 69, 029901 (2004)] doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.69.029901 [arXiv:hep-ph/0304029 [hep-ph]]

    2003 arXiv

  60. [66]

    Hannestad and G

    S. Hannestad and G. Raffelt, New supernova limit on large extra dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 051301 (2001) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.051301 [arXiv:hep- ph/0103201 [hep-ph]]

    2001

  61. [67]

    T. Han, J. D. Lykken and R. J. Zhang, On Kaluza- Klein states from large extra dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 59, 105006 (1999) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.59.105006 [arXiv:hep-ph/9811350 [hep-ph]]

    1999 arXiv

  62. [68]

    L. J. Hall and D. Tucker-Smith, Cosmolog- ical constraints on theories with large extra dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 60, 085008 (1999) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.60.085008 [arXiv:hep- ph/9904267 [hep-ph]]

    1999

  63. [69]

    Hannestad and G

    S. Hannestad and G. G. Raffelt, Stringent neutron star limits on large extra dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 071301 (2002) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.071301 [arXiv:hep-ph/0110067 [hep-ph]]

    2002 arXiv

  64. [70]

    R. N. Mohapatra, S. Nussinov and A. Perez- Lorenzana, Large extra dimensions and decay- ing KK recurrences, Phys. Rev. D 68, 116001 (2003) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.68.116001 [arXiv:hep- ph/0308051 [hep-ph]]

    2003

  65. [72]

    Hannestad, Strong constraint on large extra di- mensions from cosmology, Phys

    S. Hannestad, Strong constraint on large extra di- mensions from cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 64, 023515 (2001) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.64.023515 [arXiv:hep- ph/0102290 [hep-ph]]

    2001

  66. [73]

    Fairbairn, Cosmological constraints on large extra dimensions, Phys

    M. Fairbairn, Cosmological constraints on large extra dimensions, Phys. Lett. B 508, 335-339 (2001) doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(01)00501-9 [arXiv:hep- ph/0101131 [hep-ph]]

    2001

  67. [74]

    Macesanu and M

    C. Macesanu and M. Trodden, Relaxing cosmologi- cal constraints on large extra dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 71, 024008 (2005) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.71.024008 [arXiv:hep-ph/0407231 [hep-ph]]

    2005 arXiv

  68. [75]

    Kawasaki, K

    M. Kawasaki, K. Kohri and N. Sugiyama, Cosmological constraints on late time entropy production, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4168 (1999) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.4168 [arXiv:astro-ph/9811437 [astro-ph]]

    1999 arXiv

  69. [76]

    Kawasaki, K

    M. Kawasaki, K. Kohri and N. Sugiyama, MeV scale reheating temperature and thermalization of neutrino background, Phys. Rev. D 62, 023506 (2000) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.62.023506 [arXiv:astro- ph/0002127 [astro-ph]]

    2000

  70. [77]

    Ichikawa, M

    K. Ichikawa, M. Kawasaki and F. Takahashi, The oscil- lation effects on thermalization of the neutrinos in the Universe with low reheating temperature, Phys. Rev. D 72, 043522 (2005) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.72.043522 [arXiv:astro-ph/0505395 [astro-ph]]

    2005 arXiv

  71. [78]

    P. F. de Salas, M. Lattanzi, G. Mangano, G. Miele, S. Pastor and O. Pisanti, Bounds on very low re- heating scenarios after Planck, Phys. Rev. D 92, no.12, 123534 (2015) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.123534 [arXiv:1511.00672 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2015 arXiv

  72. [79]

    Hasegawa, N

    T. Hasegawa, N. Hiroshima, K. Kohri, R. S. L. Hansen, T. Tram and S. Hannestad, MeV-scale reheating temperature and thermalization of oscillating neu- trinos by radiative and hadronic decays of massive particles, JCAP 12, 012 (2019) doi:10.1088/1475- 7516/2019/12/012 [arXiv:19...

    2019 arXiv

  73. [80]

    Hannestad, What is the lowest possible re- heating temperature?, Phys

    S. Hannestad, What is the lowest possible re- heating temperature?, Phys. Rev. D 70, 043506 (2004) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.70.043506 [arXiv:astro- ph/0403291 [astro-ph]]

    2004

  74. [81]

    Ichikawa, M

    K. Ichikawa, M. Kawasaki and F. Takahashi, Con- straint on the effective number of neutrino species from the WMAP and SDSS LRG power spectra, JCAP 05, 007 (2007) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2007/05/007 [arXiv:astro-ph/0611784 [astro-ph]]

    2007 arXiv

  75. [82]

    De Bernardis, L

    F. De Bernardis, L. Pagano and A. Melchiorri, New con- straints on the reheating temperature of the universe after WMAP-5, Astropart. Phys. 30, 192-195 (2008) doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2008.09.005

    2008 doi

  76. [83]

    Barbieri, T

    N. Barbieri, T. Brinckmann, S. Gariazzo, M. Lattanzi, S. Pastor and O. Pisanti, Current constraints on cosmo- logical scenarios with very low reheating temperatures, [arXiv:2501.01369 [astro-ph.CO]]. 13

  77. [84]

    K. N. Abazajian and H. G. Escudero, Visible in the laboratory and invisible in cosmology: Decaying sterile neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 108, no.12, 123036 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.123036 [arXiv:2309.11492 [hep-ph]]

    2023 arXiv

  78. [85]

    H. G. Escudero, J. L. Kuo, R. E. Keeley and K. N. Abazajian, Early or phantom dark energy, self-interacting, extra, or massive neutrinos, pri- mordial magnetic fields, or a curved universe: An exploration of possible solutions to the H0 and σ8 problems, Phys. Rev. D 106, no.10...

    2022 arXiv

  79. [86]

    Patrignani et al

    C. Patrignani et al. [Particle Data Group], Review of Particle Physics, Chin. Phys. C40, no.10, 100001 (2016) doi:10.1088/1674-1137/40/10/100001

    2016 doi

  80. [87]

    Friedrich, G

    S. Friedrich, G. B. Kim, C. Bray, R. Cantor, J. Dilling, S. Fretwell, J. A. Hall, A. Lennarz, V. Lordi and P. Machule, et al. Limits on the existence of sub-MeV sterile neutrinos from the decay of 7Be in supercon- ducting quantum sensors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, no.2, 021803 (20...

    2021 arXiv

  81. [88]

    Hu and J

    W. Hu and J. Silk, Thermalization constraints and spectral distortions for massive unstable relic particles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2661-2664 (1993) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.2661

    1993 doi

  82. [89]

    P. F. Smith, Proposed experiments to detect keV range sterile neutrinos using energy-momentum reconstruc- tion of beta decay or K-capture events, New J. Phys. 21, no.5, 053022 (2019) doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ab1502 [arXiv:1607.06876 [physics.ins-det]]

    2019 arXiv

  83. [90]

    Mertens et al

    S. Mertens et al. [KATRIN], A novel detector system for KATRIN to search for keV-scale sterile neutrinos, J. Phys. G 46, no.6, 065203 (2019) doi:10.1088/1361- 6471/ab12fe [arXiv:1810.06711 [physics.ins-det]]

    2019 arXiv

  84. [91]

    C. Lee, X. Zhang, A. Kavner, T. Parsons-Davis, D. Lee, S. T. P. Boyd, M. Loidl, X. Mougeot, M. Rodrigues and M. K. Lee, et al. Magneto-ν: Heavy neutral lepton search using 241Pu β− decays, [arXiv:2503.18350 [hep- ex]]

  85. [92]

    M. G. Betti et al. [PTOLEMY], Neutrino physics with the PTOLEMY project: active neutrino proper- ties and the light sterile case, JCAP 07, 047 (2019) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/07/047 [arXiv:1902.05508 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2019 arXiv

  86. [93]

    K. R. Dienes and B. Thomas, Dynamical Dark Matter: I. Theoretical Overview, Phys. Rev. D 85, 083523 (2012) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.85.083523 [arXiv:1106.4546 [hep-ph]]

    2012 arXiv

  87. [94]

    J. A. P. Law-Smith, G. Obied, A. Prabhu and C. Vafa, Astrophysical constraints on decaying dark gravitons, JHEP 06, 047 (2024) doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2024)047 [arXiv:2307.11048 [hep-ph]]

    2024 arXiv

  88. [95]

    A. H. G. Peter, C. E. Moody and M. Kamionkowski, Dark-Matter Decays and Self-Gravitating Halos, Phys. Rev. D 81, 103501 (2010) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.103501 [arXiv:1003.0419 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2010 arXiv

  89. [96]

    Mau et al

    S. Mau et al. [DES], Milky Way satellite Census IV: Constraints on decaying dark matter from observa- tions of Milky Way satellite galaxies, Astrophys. J. 932, no.2, 128 (2022) doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac6e65 [arXiv:2201.11740 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2022 arXiv

  90. [98]

    K. R. Dienes, E. Dudas and T. Gherghetta, Neutrino os- cillations without neutrino masses or heavy mass scales: A Higher dimensional seesaw mechanism, Nucl. Phys. B 557, 25 (1999) doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(99)00377-6 [arXiv:hep-ph/9811428 [hep-ph]]

    1999 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Arkani-Hamed, S

    N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, G. R. Dvali and J. March-Russell, Neutrino masses from large extra dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 65, 024032 (2001) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.65.024032 [arXiv:hep- ph/9811448 [hep-ph]]

    2001

  92. [100]

    G. R. Dvali and A. Y. Smirnov, Probing large extra dimensions with neutrinos, Nucl. Phys. B 563, 63-81 (1999) doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(99)00574-X [arXiv:hep- ph/9904211 [hep-ph]]

    1999

  93. [101]

    Davoudiasl, P

    H. Davoudiasl, P. Langacker and M. Perelstein, Con- straints on large extra dimensions from neutrino oscillation experiments, Phys. Rev. D 65, 105015 (2002) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.65.105015 [arXiv:hep- ph/0201128 [hep-ph]]

    2002

  94. [102]

    P. A. N. Machado, H. Nunokawa and R. Zukanovich Funchal, Testing for large extra dimensions with neutrino oscillations, Phys. Rev. D 84, 013003 (2011) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.84.013003 [arXiv:1101.0003 [hep-ph]]

    2011 arXiv

  95. [103]

    D. V. Forero, C. Giunti, C. A. Ternes and O. Tyagi, Large extra dimensions and neutrino experi- ments, Phys. Rev. D 106, no.3, 035027 (2022) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.035027 [arXiv:2207.02790 [hep-ph]]

    2022 arXiv

  96. [104]

    Carena, Y

    M. Carena, Y. Y. Li, C. S. Machado, P. A. N. Machado and C. E. M. Wagner, Neutrinos in large ex- tra dimensions and short-baseline νe appear- ance, Phys. Rev. D 96, no.9, 095014 (2017) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.095014 [arXiv:1708.09548 [hep-ph]]

    2017 arXiv

  97. [105]

    L. A. Anchordoqui, I. Antoniadis and J. Cunat, Dark dimension and the standard model land- scape, Phys. Rev. D 109, no.1, 016028 (2024) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.016028 [arXiv:2306.16491 [hep-ph]]

    2024 arXiv

  98. [106]

    C. P. Burgess, J. Matias and F. Quevedo, MSLED: A Minimal supersymmetric large extra dimen- sions scenario, Nucl. Phys. B 706, 71-99 (2005) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2004.11.025 [arXiv:hep- ph/0404135 [hep-ph]]

    2005

  99. [107]

    L. A. Anchordoqui, I. Antoniadis, D. L¨ ust and K. Pe˜ nal´ o Castillo, Cosmological constraints on dark neutrino towers, Phys. Rev. D (in press) [arXiv:2411.07029 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv

  100. [108]

    Y. B. Zel’dovich and I. D. Novikov, The hypothesis of cores retarded during expansion and the hot cosmolog- ical model, Soviet Astron. AJ (Engl. Transl. ), 10, 602 (1967)

    1967

  101. [109]

    Hawking, Gravitationally collapsed objects of very low mass, Mon

    S. Hawking, Gravitationally collapsed objects of very low mass, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 152, 75 (1971)

    1971

  102. [110]

    B. J. Carr and S. W. Hawking, Black holes in the early Universe, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 168, 399-415 (1974)

    1974

  103. [111]

    H. M. Hodges and G. R. Blumenthal, Arbitrariness of 14 inflationary fluctuation spectra, Phys. Rev. D 42, 3329- 3333 (1990) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.42.3329

    1990 doi

  104. [112]

    B. J. Carr and J. E. Lidsey, Primordial black holes and generalized constraints on chaotic inflation, Phys. Rev. D 48, 543-553 (1993) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.48.543

    1993 doi

  105. [113]

    Ivanov, P

    P. Ivanov, P. Naselsky and I. Novikov, Inflation and primordial black holes as dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 50, 7173-7178 (1994) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.50.7173

    1994 doi

  106. [114]

    Y. P. Wu, E. Pinetti and J. Silk, Cosmic co- incidences of primordial-black-hole dark mat- ter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, no.3, 031102 (2022) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.031102 [arXiv:2109.09875 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2022 arXiv

  107. [115]

    S. M. Leach, M. Sasaki, D. Wands and A. R. Lid- dle, Enhancement of superhorizon scale inflationary curvature perturbations, Phys. Rev. D 64, 023512 (2001) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.64.023512 [arXiv:astro- ph/0101406 [astro-ph]]

    2001

  108. [116]

    Affleck and M

    I. Affleck and M. Dine, A new mechanism for baryogenesis, Nucl. Phys. B 249, 361-380 (1985) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(85)90021-5

    1985 doi

  109. [117]

    S. W. Hawking, Black hole explosions, Nature 248 (1974), 30-31 doi:10.1038/248030a0

    1974 doi

  110. [118]

    S. W. Hawking, Particle creation by black holes, Commun. Math. Phys. 43 (1975), 199-220 [er- ratum: Commun. Math. Phys. 46 (1976), 206] doi:10.1007/BF02345020

    1975 doi

  111. [119]

    D. N. Page, Particle emission rates from a black hole: Massless particles from an uncharged, non- rotating hole, Phys. Rev. D 13 (1976), 198-206 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.13.198

    1976 doi

  112. [120]

    Carr and F

    B. Carr and F. Kuhnel, Primordial black holes as dark matter: Recent developments, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 70 (2020), 355-394 doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl- 050520-125911 [arXiv:2006.02838 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2020 arXiv

  113. [121]

    A. M. Green and B. J. Kavanagh, Primordial Black Holes as a dark matter candidate, J. Phys. G 48 (2021) no.4, 043001 doi:10.1088/1361-6471/abc534 [arXiv:2007.10722 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2021 arXiv

  114. [122]

    Villanueva-Domingo, O

    P. Villanueva-Domingo, O. Mena and S. Palomares- Ruiz, A brief review on primordial black holes as dark matter, Front. Astron. Space Sci. 8, 87 (2021) doi:10.3389/fspas.2021.681084 [arXiv:2103.12087 [astro- ph.CO]]

    2021

  115. [123]

    P. C. Argyres, S. Dimopoulos and J. March-Russell, Black holes and submillimeter dimensions, Phys. Lett. B 441 (1998), 96-104 doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(98)01184-8 [arXiv:hep-th/9808138 [hep-th]]

    1998 arXiv

  116. [124]

    L. A. Anchordoqui, I. Antoniadis and D. L¨ ust, Dark dimension, the swampland, and the dark matter fraction composed of primordial black holes, Phys. Rev. D 106, no.8, 086001 (2022) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.086001 [arXiv:2206.07071 [hep-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  117. [125]

    L. A. Anchordoqui, I. Antoniadis and D. L¨ ust, The dark universe: Primordial black hole ⇋ dark graviton gas connection, Phys. Lett. B 840, 137844 (2023) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.137844 [arXiv:2210.02475 [hep-th]]

    2023

  118. [126]

    L. A. Anchordoqui, I. Antoniadis and D. L¨ ust, The dark dimension, the swampland, and the dark mat- ter fraction composed of primordial near-extremal black holes, Phys. Rev. D 109, no.9, 095008 (2024) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.095008 [arXiv:2401.09087 [hep-th]]

    2024 arXiv

  119. [127]

    L. A. Anchordoqui, I. Antoniadis and D. L¨ ust, More on black holes perceiving the dark dimen- sion, Phys. Rev. D 110, no.1, 015004 (2024) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.015004 [arXiv:2403.19604 [hep-th]]

    2024 arXiv

  120. [128]

    V. P. Frolov and D. Stojkovic, Black hole radia- tion in the brane world and recoil effect, Phys. Rev. D 66, 084002 (2002) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.66.084002 [arXiv:hep-th/0206046 [hep-th]]

    2002 arXiv

  121. [129]

    V. P. Frolov and D. Stojkovic, Black hole as a point radiator and recoil effect in the brane world, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 151302 (2002) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.151302 [arXiv:hep- th/0208102 [hep-th]]

    2002

  122. [130]

    Flachi and T

    A. Flachi and T. Tanaka, Escape of black holes from the brane, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 161302 (2005) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.161302 [arXiv:hep- th/0506145 [hep-th]]

    2005

  123. [131]

    Flachi, O

    A. Flachi, O. Pujolas, M. Sasaki and T. Tanaka, Black holes escaping from domain walls, Phys. Rev. D 73, 125017 (2006) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.73.125017 [arXiv:hep-th/0601174 [hep-th]]

    2006 arXiv

  124. [132]

    L. A. Anchordoqui, I. Antoniadis, D. L¨ ust and K. Pe˜ nal´ o. Castillo, Bulk black hole dark matter, Phys. Dark Univ. 46, 101714 (2024) doi:10.1016/j.dark.2024.101714 [arXiv:2407.21031 [hep-th]]

    2024

  125. [133]

    F. R. Tangherlini, Schwarzschild field in n dimensions and the dimensionality of space problem, Nuovo Cim. 27 (1963), 636-651 doi:10.1007/BF02784569

    1963 doi

  126. [134]

    R. C. Myers and M. J. Perry, Black holes in higher di- mensional space-times, Annals Phys. 172 (1986), 304 doi:10.1016/0003-4916(86)90186-7

    1986 doi

  127. [135]

    L. A. Anchordoqui, J. L. Feng, H. Goldberg and A. D. Shapere, Black holes from cosmic rays: Probes of extra dimensions and new lim- its on TeV scale gravity, Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002), 124027 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.65.124027 [arXiv:hep- ph/0112247 [hep-ph]]

    2002

  128. [136]

    L. A. Anchordoqui, Ultra-high-energy cos- mic rays, Phys. Rept. 801, 1-93 (2019) doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2019.01.002 [arXiv:1807.09645 [astro-ph.HE]]

    2019 arXiv

  129. [137]

    Aab et al

    A. Aab et al. [Pierre Auger], Muons in air show- ers at the Pierre Auger observatory: Mean num- ber in highly inclined events, Phys. Rev. D 91, no.3, 032003 (2015) [erratum: Phys. Rev. D 91, no.5, 059901 (2015)] doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.032003 [arXiv:1408.1421 [astro-ph.HE]]

    2015 arXiv

  130. [138]

    Aab et al

    A. Aab et al. [Pierre Auger], Testing hadronic interactions at ultrahigh energies with air show- ers measured by the Pierre Auger observa- tory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, no.19, 192001 (2016) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.192001 [arXiv:1610.08509 [hep-ex]]

    2016 arXiv

  131. [139]

    Albrecht, L

    J. Albrecht, L. Cazon, H. Dembinski, A. Fedynitch, K. H. Kampert, T. Pierog, W. Rhode, D. Soldin, B. Spaan and R. Ulrich, et al. The Muon Puzzle in cosmic-ray induced air showers and its connection to the Large Hadron Collider, Astrophys. Space Sci. 367, no.3, 27 (2022) doi:10...

    2022 arXiv

  132. [140]

    Banks and W

    T. Banks and W. Fischler, A model for high-energy scat- tering in quantum gravity, [arXiv:hep-th/9906038 [hep- 15 th]]

    arXiv

  133. [141]

    L. A. Anchordoqui, J. L. Feng, H. Goldberg and A. D. Shapere, Updated limits on TeV scale grav- ity from absence of neutrino cosmic ray showers me- diated by black holes, Phys. Rev. D 68, 104025 (2003) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.68.104025 [arXiv:hep- ph/0307228 [hep-ph]]

    2003

  134. [142]

    Cornet, J

    F. Cornet, J. I. Illana and M. Masip, TeV strings and the neutrino nucleon cross-section at ultrahigh-energies, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4235-4238 (2001) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.4235 [arXiv:hep- ph/0102065 [hep-ph]]

    2001

  135. [143]

    Kazanas and A

    D. Kazanas and A. Nicolaidis, Cosmic rays and large extra dimensions, Gen. Rel. Grav. 35, 1117- 1123 (2003) doi:10.1023/A:1024077103557 [arXiv:hep- ph/0109247 [hep-ph]]

    2003

  136. [144]

    B. Koch, H. J. Drescher and M. Bleicher, Gravitational radiation from ultrahigh energy cosmic rays in mod- els with large extra dimensions, Astropart. Phys. 25, 291-297 (2006) doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2006.02.007 [arXiv:astro-ph/0602164 [astro-ph]]

    2006 arXiv

  137. [145]

    N. S. Martynenko, G. I. Rubtsov, P. S. Satunin, A. K. Sharofeev and S. V. Troitsky, Hypothetical Lorentz invariance violation and the muon content of extensive air showers, [arXiv:2412.08349 [astro-ph.HE]]

  138. [146]

    Aab et al

    A. Aab et al. [Pierre Auger], Measurement of the fluctuations in the number of muons in ex- tensive air showers with the Pierre Auger Ob- servatory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, no.15, 152002 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.152002 [arXiv:2102.07797 [hep-ex]]

    2021 arXiv

  139. [147]

    Abdul Halim et al

    A. Abdul Halim et al. [Pierre Auger], Testing hadronic- model predictions of depth of maximum of air-shower profiles and ground-particle signals using hybrid data of the Pierre Auger Observatory, Phys. Rev. D109, no.10, 102001 (2024) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.102001 [arXiv:2401...

    2024 arXiv

  140. [148]

    Bai and N

    Y. Bai and N. Orlofsky, Microlensing of X-ray pul- sars: a method to detect primordial black hole dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 99, no.12, 123019 (2019) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.123019 [arXiv:1812.01427 [astro-ph.HE]]

    2019 arXiv

  141. [149]

    Tamta, N

    M. Tamta, N. Raj and P. Sharma, Breaking into the window of primordial black hole dark matter with x-ray microlensing, [arXiv:2405.20365 [astro-ph.HE]]

    arXiv

  142. [150]

    L. A. Anchordoqui, I. Antoniadis, D. L¨ ust and K. Pe˜ nal´ o Castillo, Through the looking glass into the dark dimension: Searching for bulk black hole dark matter with microlensing of X-ray pulsars, Phys. Dark Univ. 46, 101681 (2024) doi:10.1016/j.dark.2024.101681 [arXiv:240...

    2024

  143. [151]

    J. M. Berryman, A. de Gouvˆ ea, K. J. Kelly, O. L. G. Peres and Z. Tabrizi, Large extra di- mensions at the Deep Underground Neutrino Ex- periment, Phys. Rev. D 94, no.3, 033006 (2016) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.033006 [arXiv:1603.00018 [hep-ph]]

    2016 arXiv

  144. [152]

    Siyeon, S

    K. Siyeon, S. Kim, M. Masud and J. Park, Prob- ing large extra dimension at DUNE using beam tunes, JHEP 11, 141 (2024) doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2024)141 [arXiv:2409.08620 [hep-ph]]

    2024 arXiv

  145. [153]

    Aab et al

    A. Aab et al. [Pierre Auger], The Pierre Auger observatory upgrade: Preliminary design report, [arXiv:1604.03637 [astro-ph.IM]]

    arXiv

  146. [154]

    J. J. Heckman, C. Vafa, T. Weigand and F. Xu, Dark dimension and the grand unification of forces, Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025) no.4, 046014 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.046014 [arXiv:2409.01405 [hep-th]]

    2025 arXiv

  147. [155]

    Gendler and C

    N. Gendler and C. Vafa, Axions in the dark dimension, JHEP 12, 127 (2024) doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2024)127 [arXiv:2404.15414 [hep-th]]

    2024 arXiv

  148. [156]

    Hamaguchi, N

    K. Hamaguchi, N. Nagata, K. Yanagi and J. Zheng, Limit on the axion decay constant from the cool- ing neutron star in Cassiopeia A, Phys. Rev. D 98, no.10, 103015 (2018) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.103015 [arXiv:1806.07151 [hep-ph]]

    2018 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.