Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 4 minor 31 references

Structural and Transport Properties of Thin InAs Layers Grown on InxAl1-xAs Metamorphic Buffers

T0 review · 5 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Thin InAs films on metamorphic buffers conduct mainly through a defected interface layer and a surface accumulation layer, not through the bulk, for thicknesses below about 100 nm.

desk verdict Solid growth and XRD, useful dataset, but the quantitative surface/interface decomposition is a self-consistent fit rather than an independent measurement; the extracted sheet densities carry an unquantified factor-of-two bias. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.13634 v1 pith:2GGEXKIW submitted 2025-01-23 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Giulio Senesi , Katarzyna Skibinska , Alessandro Paghi , Gaurav Shukla , Francesco Giazotto , Fabio Beltram , Stefan Heun , Lucia Sorba This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords InAsAlmetamorphicbuffermolecularbeamepitaxyvanderPauwHallparallel-conductionmodelsurfacechargeaccumulationinterfacedislocationssuperconductor-semiconductordevices
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the room-temperature transport of thin InAs layers grown by molecular beam epitaxy on InAlAs metamorphic buffers is controlled by two thin conducting regions—a surface accumulation layer and a defected interface layer—rather than by the bulk of the film. It reports growth of InAs films from 12.5 nm to 500 nm, structural characterization by high-resolution X-ray diffraction, and Hall measurements in the van der Pauw geometry at 300 K. A two-parallel-channel model reproduces the thickness dependence of carrier concentration and mobility, and capped-reference samples separate the surface contribution from the interface contribution. If the model is right, for films below about 100 nm the usable charge in a device sits almost entirely at the surface and interface, which matters for the design of gate-tunable superconductor-semiconductor quantum devices on insulating buffers.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the two-parallel-channel conduction model, a reduction of Petritz's two-layer Hall-coefficient formula to $n = n_{\mathrm{bs}} + (n_{\mathrm{int}} - n_{\mathrm{bs}}) t_{\mathrm{int}}/t$ by setting the correction factor $f$ to one. The model splits the film into a fixed ~10 nm defected interface layer, whose thickness is identified with the critical thickness of InAs on In$_{0.84}$Al$_{0.16}$As, and a 'bulk–surface' layer of thickness $t - t_{\mathrm{int}}$ whose carrier concentration $n_{\mathrm{bs}}$ is treated as a constant average over the dataset. The same decomposition is applied to conductivity, and the two fits combine through $\mu_H = \sigma/(ne)$ into a mobility-versus-thickness curve that tracks the measured Hall mobility. Capped samples with a 5 nm In$_{0.84}$Al$_{0.16}$As layer supply the independent surface-charge estimate that completes the decomposition.

What would settle it

Perform low-temperature Hall and mobility-spectrum measurements on the 50 nm and 100 nm samples to resolve the two channels independently; if the resolved surface and interface sheet densities do not sum to the measured total sheet density, or if $n_{\mathrm{bs}}$ extracted from films of different thickness is found to change systematically as strain relaxes, the fixed-$n_{\mathrm{bs}}$ two-channel decomposition in Eq. (8) is not a unique description.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the thickness dependence of the Hall carrier concentration in InAs on InAlAs metamorphic buffers is described by two parallel conduction channels: a heavily defected interface layer about 10 nm thick with volume concentration $n_{\mathrm{int}} \simeq 4.8\times10^{18}$ cm$^{-3}$, and a 'bulk–surface' layer with an average concentration $n_{\mathrm{bs}} = (5.1 \pm 1.4)\times10^{16}$ cm$^{-3}$. The fit of $n = n_{\mathrm{bs}} + (n_{\mathrm{int}} - n_{\mathrm{bs}}) t_{\mathrm{int}}/t$ to samples from 12.5 to 500 nm gives an interface sheet density $n_{\mathrm{int}}t_{\mathrm{int}} = (4.8 \pm 0.3)\times10^{12}$ cm$^{-2}$, and capped samples give a surface sheet density $n_{\mathrm{s}}t_{\mathrm{s}} = (2.2 \pm 0.5)\times10^{12}$ cm$^{-2}$. The two sum to $(7.0 \pm 0.6)\times10^{12}$ cm$^{-2}$, matching the measured sheet densities of the 50 nm and 100 nm films, which supports the conclusion that for $t \lesssim 100$ nm most of the charge lies at the surface and interface rather than in the bulk.

Load-bearing premise

The model assumes that the interface layer keeps a constant thickness of about 10 nm and that the carrier concentration of the combined bulk-surface layer is the same for every film thickness; the paper itself notes that the model overestimates the charge for the 12.5 nm and 25 nm samples, where the interface layer should be less charged near the critical thickness.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For 50 nm and 100 nm films, the measured sheet carrier concentrations match the sum of the extracted surface and interface sheet densities within error, so a device designer should treat these two regions as the main charge reservoirs.
  • A 5 nm In$_{0.84}$Al$_{0.16}$As cap removes about $2.2\times10^{12}$ cm$^{-2}$ of surface charge, which means surface accumulation can be suppressed independently of the interface channel.
  • The interface sheet density of $4.8\times10^{12}$ cm$^{-2}$ corresponds to a volume concentration about ten times lower than the comparable InAs-on-GaAs value, consistent with a lower dislocation density on the metamorphic buffer.
  • Strain relaxation and XRD linewidth both scale roughly as $1/t$, so the structural quality of these films is set by thickness broadening and relaxation, not by a thickness-independent defect density.
  • The model intentionally fails for 12.5 nm and 25 nm films because near the critical thickness fewer dislocations have nucleated, so the interface channel is less charged than the constant-$t_{\mathrm{int}}$ picture assumes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the same two channels persist at cryogenic temperatures, gate-tunable superconductor-semiconductor devices on these buffers would start from a fixed surface/interface electron budget of roughly $7\times10^{12}$ cm$^{-2}$, which sets the scale for depletion-gate design.
  • A direct test of the dislocation picture would be to correlate the fitted interface sheet density with threading-dislocation densities measured by X-ray topography or cross-sectional TEM on identically grown films; the model implies a monotonic relationship.
  • Because $n_{\mathrm{bs}}$ is fitted as a thickness-independent average while strain relaxation clearly evolves with thickness, the quoted surface and interface sheet densities are best read as effective parameters of a two-layer model, not as uniquely determined physical constants.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports the MBE growth of thin InAs layers (12.5–500 nm) on InxAl1−xAs metamorphic buffers and characterizes them with high-resolution X-ray diffraction and room-temperature van der Pauw transport measurements. The structural part shows that perpendicular strain and XRD FWHM scale roughly as 1/t. The transport part proposes a two-parallel-channel model with a constant interface layer and a bulk–surface layer. From fits to Equations (8) and (9), the authors extract a surface sheet density n_s t_s = (2.2 ± 0.5) × 10^12 cm^-2 and an interface sheet density n_int t_int = (4.8 ± 0.3) × 10^12 cm^-2, and conclude that for t ≲ 100 nm most of the charge in the InAs film resides in the surface and interface regions. The capping experiment (samples H and I) is used as a control for the surface contribution.

Significance. The structural characterization is solid: the 1/t dependence of strain and FWHM is supported by the data and the comparison with InAs grown directly on GaAs is informative. The capping experiment is a well-designed control and provides a direct estimate of the surface sheet density. If the quantitative transport decomposition were reliable, the extracted surface and interface sheet densities would be useful for designing InAs-based devices on insulating buffers. However, the decomposition rests on several approximations, some acknowledged in the text, that are not quantitatively propagated. The central quantitative claim—surface-plus-interface dominance for thin films with the stated sheet densities—is therefore not yet established to the standard of the structural results.

major comments (5)
  1. [Section 3.2, Equations (7)–(8)] Setting the factor f to 1 in Equation (8) is not justified by the authors' own consistency check, which reports 1 < f < 2 for every thickness. Because f multiplies the expression for n, the fitted parameters n_bs and (n_int − n_bs)·t_int are biased whenever f differs from unity. The authors should either include f in the fitting procedure or propagate the uncertainty in f into the extracted sheet densities; otherwise the quoted n_int·t_int = (4.8 ± 0.3) × 10^12 cm^-2 does not reflect the true uncertainty of the model.
  2. [Section 3.2, text after Equation (8)] The model fitting assumes a constant n_bs, yet the text explicitly states that n_bs is not expected to be constant as a function of t because for t ≲ L_D the bulk–surface layer is surface-dominated. The fitted n_bs is therefore only a thickness-averaged value, and the data do not identify a constant bulk–surface channel plus a constant interface channel. This weakens the interpretation of the extracted interface sheet density and the conclusion that most of the charge is in the surface and interface layers for t < 100 nm.
  3. [Figure 8 and Equation (10)] The solid line in Figure 8 is computed from Equation (10) using the best-fit parameters obtained from Equations (8) and (9), which are fits to the same 300 K dataset. The agreement is therefore a re-plot of fitted quantities, not an independent validation of the two-channel model. An out-of-sample test, such as excluding one thickness from the fit and predicting it, would be needed to assess predictive power.
  4. [Section 3.2, samples A and B (12.5 nm and 25 nm)] The model is acknowledged to fail for the two thinnest samples because the interface layer is expected to be less charged near the critical thickness. These are precisely the thicknesses in the range where the claim that surface and interface layers dominate (t ≲ 100 nm) is most consequential. The limitation should be stated as a caveat on the main conclusion, and the quantitative sheet densities should not be presented as applying to the full thickness range without this caveat.
  5. [Section 3.2, interface layer thickness t_int] The interface layer thickness t_int is assumed to be ~10 nm for all samples without direct measurement, and the extracted n_int ≈ 4.8 × 10^18 cm^-3 scales inversely with t_int. If t_int varies with strain relaxation or dislocation density—which changes strongly from sample A to G—the decomposition into surface and interface charge is not uniquely determined. The authors should provide a sensitivity analysis or an independent estimate of t_int.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'Differently than InAs substrates' is non-standard English; consider 'Unlike InAs substrates'.
  2. [Section 3.2, Equation (10)] The square brackets in Equation (10) are typeset inconsistently (the numerator uses an opening square bracket and the denominator uses a ceiling-like symbol). Please check the mathematical notation.
  3. [Figure 6] The fit line in Figure 6 would be clearer with the fit parameters and their uncertainties printed in the caption, rather than only in the text.
  4. [Table 1] The error on relaxation is not reported; adding it would help evaluate the strain relaxation trends.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Fig. 8 mobility curve is a re-plot of the same 300 K fits, not an independent prediction; the surface/interface claim otherwise retains independent support from the capping experiment.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 3.2, Equations (8)-(10); Figure 8 caption]
    "Since µH = σ/(ne), we finally obtain µ𝐻 = (𝜎𝑖𝑛𝑡 − 𝜎𝑏𝑠)𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑡 + 𝜎𝑏𝑠𝑡 / ⌈(𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑡 − 𝑛𝑏𝑠)𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑡 + 𝑛𝑏𝑠𝑡⌉𝑒 (10). Figure 8 plots the Hall mobility using Equation (10) using the best-fit parameters obtained from Equations (8) and (9)."

    Equation (10) is the algebraic identity mu = sigma/(ne) applied to the two-channel expressions (8) and (9). The parameters n_bs, (n_int - n_bs)t_int, sigma_bs, and (sigma_int - sigma_bs)t_int are least-squares fits to the same 300 K n(t) and sigma(t) data shown in Figures 6 and 7. Therefore the solid line in Figure 8 is a deterministic re-plot of fitted quantities, not an independent prediction. Agreement between that line and the measured mobilities only restates that each separate fit is close to its own dataset; it cannot independently validate the two-channel decomposition.

full rationale

Most of the paper's derivation chain is self-contained empirical work: the strain and FWHM analyses are direct fits to XRD data, and the surface contribution is quantified by a separate capping experiment (samples H/I) that does not depend on the two-channel fit. The interface sheet density is obtained by fitting Equation (8) to the measured n(t), which is a legitimate model-dependent extraction rather than a circular prediction. The main circularity is confined to the mobility curve: Equation (10) is just mu = sigma/(ne) with sigma and n replaced by the two-channel fits (9) and (8), whose parameters were obtained from the same 300 K dataset. Thus the solid line in Figure 8 is not an independent test; its agreement with the mobility data is algebraically forced by the quality of the two preceding fits. The f=1 approximation in Equations (7)-(8), later found to give 1 < f < 2, is a model-consistency caveat rather than a circularity; it affects the accuracy of the extracted parameters but does not reduce a prediction to an input. Self-citations [17,21] used to set t_int ~ 10 nm are supported by the paper's own relaxation data and are not the sole load-bearing justification. Overall, the central surface-plus-interface dominance claim has independent support from the capping experiment, but the model's mobility agreement is a re-plot of fitted quantities, so a moderate partial-circularity score is appropriate.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model relies on a standard two-layer Hall formula, a simplifying f = 1 approximation, and a chosen interface thickness of about 10 nm; all transport parameters are fitted to the same 300 K dataset. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (5)
  • n_bs (bulk-surface carrier concentration) = (5.1 +/- 1.4) x 10^16 cm^-3
    Fit parameter in Eq. (8) representing a thickness-averaged bulk-surface volume carrier concentration.
  • (n_int - n_bs) * t_int = (4.9 +/- 0.3) x 10^12 cm^-2
    Fit parameter in Eq. (8); combined with the assumed t_int it yields n_int near 4.8 x 10^18 cm^-3.
  • sigma_bs (bulk-surface conductivity) = (1.1 +/- 0.3) x 10^2 Ohm^-1 cm^-1
    Fit parameter in Eq. (9) for the conductivity thickness dependence.
  • (sigma_int - sigma_bs) * t_int = (1.7 +/- 0.3) x 10^4 Ohm^-1 cm^-1 nm
    Fit parameter in Eq. (9); used together with sigma_bs to compute the mobility curve in Eq. (10).
  • t_int (interface layer thickness) = about 10 nm (assumed, not measured)
    Chosen from the expected critical thickness of InAs on the metamorphic buffer; used to convert (n_int - n_bs) t_int into n_int and to define the two-layer geometry.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Two-layer Petritz Hall formula applies to these InAs stacks
    Used to derive Eq. (6) from Ref. 28; standard but assumes two distinct uniform layers.
  • domain assumption Hall factor f is approximately 1
    The paper sets f = 1 in Eq. (7), noting a consistency estimate of 1 < f < 2; this approximation is not propagated into the reported parameter errors.
  • domain assumption Surface accumulation is fully suppressed by the InAlAs cap
    Capped samples H and I are used to estimate the surface sheet density, assuming the cap removes surface charge without introducing or changing interface charge.
  • domain assumption Bulk-surface carrier concentration n_bs is constant over the thickness series
    Equation (8) is fitted with a single n_bs, so the extracted value is an average over the dataset; the paper acknowledges this.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Structural and Transport Properties of Thin InAs Layers Grown on InxAl1-xAs Metamorphic Buffers." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2GGEXKIW

@misc{pith2026250113634,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Structural and Transport Properties of Thin InAs Layers Grown on InxAl1-xAs Metamorphic Buffers},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2GGEXKIW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.13634}
}
read the original abstract

Indium Arsenide is a III-V semiconductor with low electron effective mass, a small band gap, strong spin-orbit coupling, and a large g-factor. These properties and its surface Fermi level pinned in the conduction band make InAs a good candidate for developing superconducting solid-state quantum devices. Here, we report the epitaxial growth of very thin InAs layers with thicknesses ranging from 12.5 nm to 500 nm grown by Molecular Beam Epitaxy on InxAl1-xAs metamorphic buffers. Differently than InAs substrates, these buffers have the advantage of being insulating at cryogenic temperatures, which allows for multiple device operations on the same wafer and thus making the approach scalable. The structural properties of the InAs layers were investigated by high-resolution X-ray diffraction, demonstrating the high crystal quality of the InAs layers. Furthermore, their transport properties, such as total and sheet carrier concentration, sheet resistance, and carrier mobility, were measured in the van der Pauw configuration at room temperature. A simple conduction model was employed to quantify the surface, bulk, and interface contributions to the overall carrier concentration and mobility.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.13634 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Sample structure of InAs layer grown on InxAl1−xAs metamorphic buffer. (b) Sample structure of InAs layer grown on InxAl1−xAs metamorphic buffer with capping layer. (c) Sample structure of InAs layer grown on GaAs substrate. Nomarski optical microscopy was used to evaluate the surface morphology of each grown sam￾ple. For the InAs on metamorphic buffers and on the GaAs substrate samples, μm sized defects are pre… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Symmetric (004) ω-2θ scans obtained along the 0° azimuth from (a) a series of samples with different InAs thicknesses grown on InAlAs metamorphic buffers and (b) 100 nm thick InAs layers grown directly on a GaAs sub￾strate at a sample temperature of 500 °C (sample J) and 560 °C (sample K). Three prominent peaks are present in all spectra (Figure 2a): the substrate, the OS, and the InAs layer peaks. The most intense … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Perpendicular strain of the InAs layers as a function of InAs thickness. The black squares correspond to sam￾ples A–G, while the red dot and blue triangle correspond to samples J and K, respectively. A fit function that scales 1/t is reported as a solid black line. The values of εOS⊥ are comparable within the experimental error, with samples F and G as slight outliers (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FWHM of the InAs peak as a function of InAs film thickness of samples grown on metamorphic buffers (samples A–G, dots) and on GaAs substrates (samples J and K, squares). The continuous line is the result of the fitting of the FWHM versus 1/t. We notice that the FWHM of…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Sheet carrier concentration Ns of samples A–G versus InAs thickness t measured in van der Pauw geometry at 300 K [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The volume carrier concentration n of samples A–G versus InAs thickness t, measured at 300 K using the van der Pauw geometry. The continuous line is the result of the fitting procedure to Equation (8) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: reports the sheet resistance Rs of the samples with InAs layers grown on metamorphic buffers as a function of InAs thickness t. As shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Hall mobility of samples A–G versus InAs thickness measured using the van der Pauw geometry at 300 K. The solid line was calculated from Equation (10) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Schematic view of the three different conduction channels in the InAs layer. • Layer 1 (surface layer): since the InAs surface Fermi level is pinned in the conduction band, which is bent at the InAs–vacuum interface, surface charge accumulation takes place, and the pre…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    InAs on Insulator: A New Platform for Cryogenic Hybrid Superconducting Electronics

    Paghi, A.; Trupiano, G.; de Simoni, G.; Arif, O.; Sorba, L.; Giazotto, F. InAs on Insulator: A New Platform for Cryogenic Hybrid Superconducting Electronics. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2024, 2416957. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202416957

    doi:10.1002/adfm.202416957 2024

  2. [2]

    Epitaxial indium arsenide by vacuum evaporation

    Godinho, N.; Brunnschweiler, A. Epitaxial indium arsenide by vacuum evaporation. Solid-State Electron. 1970, 13, 47–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-1101(70)90006-7

    work page doi:10.1016/0038-1101(70)90006-7 1970

  3. [3]

    Epitaxial InAs on Semi-Insulating GaAs Substrate

    Cronin, G.R.; Conrad, R.W.; Borrello, S.R. Epitaxial InAs on Semi-Insulating GaAs Substrate. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1966, 113, 1336–1338. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2423819

    work page doi:10.1149/1.2423819 1966

  4. [4]

    Preparation and properties of epitaxial InAs

    McCarthy, J.P. Preparation and properties of epitaxial InAs. Solid-State Electron. 1967, 10, 649–

    work page 1967

  5. [5]

    Molecular Beam Epitaxial Growth of InAs

    Yano, M.; Nogami, M.; Matsushima, Y.; Kimata, M. Molecular Beam Epitaxial Growth of InAs. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 1977, 16, 2131–2137. https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.16.2131

    work page doi:10.1143/jjap.16.2131 1977

  6. [6]

    Thin InAs epitaxial layers grown on (100) GaAs sub- strates by molecular beam deposition

    Meggitt, B.T.; Parker, E.H.C.; King, R.M. Thin InAs epitaxial layers grown on (100) GaAs sub- strates by molecular beam deposition. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1978, 33, 528 –530. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.90425

    work page doi:10.1063/1.90425 1978

  7. [7]

    Growth and transport properties of InAs epilayers on GaAs

    Kalem, S.; Inn, C.J.; Morkoc, H.; Bean, R.; Zanio, K. Growth and transport properties of InAs epilayers on GaAs. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1988, 53, 1647–1649. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.99938

    work page doi:10.1063/1.99938 1988

  8. [8]

    Electrical and magneto-optical of MBE InAs on GaAs

    Wang, P.D.; Holmes, S.N.; Tan, L.; Stradling, R.A.; Ferguson, I.T.; de Oliveira, A.G. Electrical and magneto-optical of MBE InAs on GaAs. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 1992, 7, 767. https://doi.org/10.1088/0268-1242/7/6/008

    work page doi:10.1088/0268-1242/7/6/008 1992

Show all 31 references
  1. [9]

    InGaN quantum well with grad- ually varying indium content for high-efficiency GaN-based green light-emitting diodes

    Zhou, S.; Wan, Z.; Lei, Y.; Tang, B.; Tao, G.; Du, P.; Zhao, X. InGaN quantum well with grad- ually varying indium content for high-efficiency GaN-based green light-emitting diodes. Opt. Lett. 2022, 47, 1291–1294. https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.452477

    2022 doi

  2. [10]

    Quantum cascade lasers grown by MOCVD

    Sun, Y.; Cui, G.; Guo, K.; Zhang, J.; Zhuo, N.; Wang, L.; Liu, S.; Jia, Z.; Fei, T.; Li, K.; et al. Quantum cascade lasers grown by MOCVD. J. Semicond. 2023, 44, 121901 . https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-4926/44/12/121901

    2023 doi

  3. [11]

    Heteroepitaxial Growth of III-V Semiconductors on Sil- icon

    Park, J.-S.; Tang, M.; Chen, S.; Liu, H. Heteroepitaxial Growth of III-V Semiconductors on Sil- icon. Crystals 2020, 10, 1163. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst10121163

    2020 doi

  4. [12]

    Heteroepitaxial InAs Grown on GaAs from Triethylindium and Ar- sine: I

    Baliga, B.J.; Ghandhi, S.K. Heteroepitaxial InAs Grown on GaAs from Triethylindium and Ar- sine: I. Growth Characterization. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1974, 121, 1642 . https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2401760

    1974 doi

  5. [13]

    Characterization of very high purity InAs grown using trimethylindium and tertiarybutylarsine

    Watkins, S.P.; Tran, C.A.; Soerensen, G.; Cheung, H.D.; Ares, R.A.; Lacroix, Y.; Thewalt, M.L.W. Characterization of very high purity InAs grown using trimethylindium and tertiarybutylarsine. J. Electron. Mater. 1995, 24, 1583–1590. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02676815

    1995 doi

  6. [14]

    Electrical characterization of InAs thin films

    Botha, L.; Shamba, P.; Botha, J.R. Electrical characterization of InAs thin films. Phys. Stat. Sol. (C) 2008, 5, 620–622. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssc.200776810

    2008 doi

  7. [15]

    Electron mobility in plastically deformed Germanium

    Pödör, B. Electron mobility in plastically deformed Germanium. Phys. Stat. Sol. (B) 1966, 16, K167–K170. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.19660160264

    1966 doi

  8. [16]

    Effect of lattice mismatch on the electron mobilities of InAs grown on GaAs by MBE

    Chang, C.-A.; Serrano, C.M.; Chang, L.L.; Esaki, L. Effect of lattice mismatch on the electron mobilities of InAs grown on GaAs by MBE. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 1980, 17, 603 –605. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.570522

    1980 doi

  9. [17]

    Influence of an Overshoot Layer on the Morphological, Structural, Strain, and Transport Proper- ties of InAs Quantum Wells

    Arif, O.; Canal, L.; Ferrari, E.; Ferrari, C.; Lazzarini, L.; Nasi, L.; Paghi, A.; Heun, S.; Sorba, L. Influence of an Overshoot Layer on the Morphological, Structural, Strain, and Transport Proper- ties of InAs Quantum Wells. Nanomaterials 2024, 14, 592 . https://doi.org/10.3...

    2024 doi

  10. [18]

    Interdiffusion be- tween InAs Quantum Dots and GaAs Matrices

    Haga, T.; Kataoka, M.; Matsumura, N.; Muto, S.; Nakata, Y.; Yokoyama, N. Interdiffusion be- tween InAs Quantum Dots and GaAs Matrices. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 1997, 36, L1113 -L1115, https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.36.L1113

    1997 doi

  11. [19]

    Initial growth stage and optical properties of a three-dimensional InAs structure on GaAs

    Nabetani, Y.; Ishikawa, T.; Noda, S.; Sasaki, A. Initial growth stage and optical properties of a three-dimensional InAs structure on GaAs. J. Appl. Phys. 1994, 76, 347 –351. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.358483

    1994 doi

  12. [20]

    Available online: https://www.ioffe.ru/SVA/NSM/Semicond/InAs/mechanic.html

    NSM Archive – Physical Properties of Semiconductors. Available online: https://www.ioffe.ru/SVA/NSM/Semicond/InAs/mechanic.html

  13. [21]

    Metamorphic InAs/InGaAs QWs with electron mobilities exceeding 7 × 105 cm2/Vs

    Benali, A.; Rajak, P.; Ciancio, R.; Plaisier, J.R.; Heun, S.; Biasiol, G. Metamorphic InAs/InGaAs QWs with electron mobilities exceeding 7 × 105 cm2/Vs. J. Cryst. Growth 2022, 593, 126768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2022.126768

    2022

  14. [22]

    Geometrical theory of critical thickness and relaxation in strained-layer growth

    Dunstan, D.J.; Young, S.; Dixon, R.H. Geometrical theory of critical thickness and relaxation in strained-layer growth. J. Appl. Phys. 1991, 70, 3038–3045. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.349335

    1991 doi

  15. [23]

    The measurement of threading dislocation densities in semiconductor crystals by X- ray diffraction

    Ayers, J.E. The measurement of threading dislocation densities in semiconductor crystals by X- ray diffraction. J. Cryst. Growth 1994, 135, 71–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022- 0248(94)90727-7

    1994 doi

  16. [24]

    Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Mathematisch- Physikalische Klasse 1918, 2, 98 –100

    Scherrer, P. Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Mathematisch- Physikalische Klasse 1918, 2, 98 –100. https://www.digizeitschriften.de/id/252457811_1918?tify=%7B%22pages%22%3A%5B102% 5D%2C%22view%22%3A%22toc%22%7D

    1918

  17. [25]

    Temperature- dependent transport properties of InAs films grown on lattice-mismatched GaP

    Gopal, V.; Souw, V.; Chen, E.-H.; Kvam, E.P.; McElfresh, M.; Woodall, J.M. Temperature- dependent transport properties of InAs films grown on lattice-mismatched GaP. J. Appl. Phys. 2000, 87, 1350–1355. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.372062

    doi

  18. [26]

    Transport properties of InSb and InAs thin films on GaAs substrates

    Okamoto, A.; Geka, H.; Shibasaki, I.; Yoshida, K. Transport properties of InSb and InAs thin films on GaAs substrates. J. Cryst. Growth 2005, 278, 604 –609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2004.12.077

    2005 doi

  19. [27]

    Thickness depend- ence of the structural and electrical properties of InAs layers epitaxially grown by MBE on GaAs (001)

    Wolkenberg, A.; Przesławski, T.; Kaniewski, J.; Bąk-Misiuk, J.; Regiński, K. Thickness depend- ence of the structural and electrical properties of InAs layers epitaxially grown by MBE on GaAs (001). Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2000, 77, 250–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5107(00)00498-0

    doi

  20. [28]

    Theory of an experiment for measuring the mobility and density of carriers in the space-charge region of a semiconductor surface

    Petritz, R.L. Theory of an experiment for measuring the mobility and density of carriers in the space-charge region of a semiconductor surface. Phys. Rev. 1958, 110, 1254 . https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.110.1254

    1958 doi

  21. [29]

    Zum Mechanismus der Widerstandsänderung im Magnetfeld

    Nedoluha, A.; Koch, K.M. Zum Mechanismus der Widerstandsänderung im Magnetfeld. Z. Phys. 1952, 132, 608–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01333220

    1952 doi

  22. [30]

    Transport coefficients of InAs epilayers

    Wieder, H.H. Transport coefficients of InAs epilayers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1974, 25, 206 –208. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1655441

    1974 doi

  23. [655]

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-1101(67)90095-0

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.