Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Polarized Dissociation and Spin Alignment of Moving Quarkonium in Quark-Gluon Plasma

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Moving spin-triplet quarkonium dissociates at a spin-dependent rate, with spin-0 dissociating least; dissociation-only Bjorken flow then gives positive $\rho_{00}-1/3$, while regeneration should flip the sign.

desk verdict A genuinely new mechanism paper: the LO polarized dissociation rate is clean and checkable, but the NLO leading-log result rests on a scale hierarchy the paper's own numerics violate, so the quantitative spin-alignment prediction is not yet established. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.16596 v1 pith:YDK6QTJX submitted 2025-01-28 hep-ph nucl-exnucl-th

Zhishun Chen , Shu Lin This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phnucl-exnucl-th
keywords quarkoniumspinalignmentpolarizeddissociationquark-gluonplasmapNRQCDchromomagneticcouplingJ/psiBjorkenflow
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes that the observed spin alignment of quarkonium in heavy-ion collisions can be caused by the plasma itself dissociating different spin states at different rates, provided the quarkonium is moving relative to the plasma. Using the effective field theory of heavy quarkonium, the authors compute the polarized dissociation rate from the spin chromomagnetic coupling for both the leading gluo-dissociation process and the next-to-leading inelastic Coulomb scattering process. They find that after averaging over directions in a Bjorken flow, the spin-0 state is dissociated less than the spin-+1 and spin-−1 states, giving a positive $\rho_{00}-1/3$. The paper also argues that regeneration, being the inverse process, should contribute with the opposite sign, which is what a full description of J/ψ production would need to include.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the spin chromomagnetic dipole coupling $\boldsymbol\mu\cdot\mathbf{B}$ in the effective field theory of heavy quarkonium, with $\boldsymbol\mu$ proportional to $(\boldsymbol\sigma-\bar{\boldsymbol\sigma})/(2m_Q)$. The dissociation rate is extracted from the imaginary part of the color-singlet self-energy via $\Gamma=-2\,\mathrm{Re}\,\Sigma_{ar}$, and the spin structure is carried by the tensor $\Gamma^{ij}=c_1\delta^{ij}+c_2\,\delta\hat v^i\delta\hat v^j$, which enters the rate splitting $\Gamma-\Gamma_{s=0}=c_2(1/3-(\delta\hat v\cdot\hat l)^2)$. For the moving quarkonium, the gluon propagators are boosted versions of the equilibrium plasma propagators: the free propagator for leading order, and the hard-thermal-loop-resummed spectral density, with cut contributions giving logarithms $\ln(T/\epsilon_B)$ and $\ln(T/m_g)$, for next-to-leading order. Finally, a Boltzmann equation with dissociation only, solved analytically under the Bjorken-flow assumption of rapidity-momentum equality, converts the rate splitting into the spin-alignment observable $\rho_{00}-1/3$.

What would settle it

Evaluate the next-to-leading-order inelastic-Coulomb-scattering contribution using the full hard-thermal-loop spectral functions at $T=300$ MeV with $\epsilon_B=0.052$ GeV and $m_g\simeq 1.5853\,T$, without the hierarchy $\epsilon_B\sim m_g\ll q_0\ll T$ and without the $O(\delta v^2)$ truncation. If the coefficient $c_2^{(2)}$ changes sign or its magnitude changes by an order of magnitude, the predicted positive $\rho_{00}-1/3$ from dissociation fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that motion of a spin-triplet quarkonium through an otherwise isotropic quark-gluon plasma breaks the degeneracy of its dissociation rates. In the quarkonium rest frame, the isotropic chromomagnetic-field fluctuations of the plasma become anisotropic, and the spin chromomagnetic coupling translates that anisotropy into a spin-dependent width. The polarization-dependent part of the rate takes the form $\Gamma-\Gamma_{s=0}=c_2(1/3-(\delta \hat v\cdot \hat l)^2)$, so the sign and size depend on the relative velocity and the quantization axis. For the leading gluo-dissociation and the log-enhanced next-to-leading inelastic Coulomb scattering, the coefficient $c_2$ is negative, and after directional averaging in a Bjorken flow the spin-0 state is left more abundant, yielding $\rho_{00}-1/3>0$; the expected regeneration contribution has the opposite sign.

Load-bearing premise

The quantitative prediction depends on a hierarchy of energy scales—binding energy and thermal gluon mass both much smaller than the gluon energies that matter—which the paper's own J/ψ parameters violate, since the thermal gluon mass is about nine times the binding energy.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Spin-0 quarkonium survives longer than spin ±1 when the plasma is moving relative to it, so dissociation alone produces more 0-state mesons and positive $\rho_{00}-1/3$.
  • The leading gluo-dissociation and the next-to-leading inelastic Coulomb scattering contribute with the same sign, so the polarized effect is not special to one process.
  • Regeneration, as the time-reversed process, is expected to flip the sign, making the net spin alignment a balance between dissociation and regeneration yields.
  • The splitting grows with the relative velocity between quarkonium and the medium, so the predicted spin alignment is momentum dependent and largest for fast mesons.
  • An isotropic plasma at rest produces no spin alignment; the effect exists only through motion, so it is tied to the presence of flow.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same anisotropy mechanism should apply to any spin-dependent in-medium process for quarkonium, not only dissociation—spin-dependent energy loss or spin diffusion, for example—so the calculation provides a template for other spin-alignment observables.
  • Because the qualitative sign of the leading-order contribution is fixed by geometry and survives the questionable scale hierarchy, the prediction of positive $\rho_{00}-1/3$ from dissociation may be robust even if the quantitative rates are not; a full next-to-leading-order evaluation would settle this.
  • A clean test is to measure $\rho_{00}-1/3$ for J/$\psi$ at high transverse momentum, where dissociation of initially produced mesons dominates: the paper's mechanism predicts a positive contribution there, while regeneration-dominated low momentum should show the opposite sign.
  • The kinematic origin—relative motion plus a spin-dependent coupling—is generic, so a similar calculation could be adapted to other vector mesons whose production includes a dissociation component, connecting the J/$\psi$ and $\phi$ spin-alignment puzzles through one mechanism.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a spin-dependent dissociation mechanism for a moving spin-triplet quarkonium in the quark-gluon plasma, based on the spin chromomagnetic dipole term in pNRQCD. It computes the polarized dissociation rate at leading order (gluo-dissociation) and at next-to-leading order (inelastic Coulomb scattering, in a leading-logarithm approximation), and expresses the rate splitting in terms of a coefficient c2 times a geometric factor depending on the relative velocity direction and quantization axis. Applying the dissociation-only Boltzmann equation in a Bjorken flow with spin-independent initial conditions, the paper obtains a positive rho00-1/3 from both LO and NLO contributions, and expects regeneration to give the opposite sign.

Significance. If the calculation were quantitatively reliable, it would provide a concrete microscopic mechanism connecting quarkonium motion through an isotropic plasma to spin alignment, complementing existing coalescence-based descriptions and giving a falsifiable sign prediction for the dissociation component. The paper is transparent about the pNRQCD setup, the spin algebra in Eqs. (7)-(17) is clean, and the static LO limit agrees with Ref. [27]. It does not fit any rho00 data, so the sign prediction is not circular. However, the NLO quantitative result is not controlled as presented because the scale hierarchy used in its derivation is violated by the chosen numerical inputs; this is the main load-bearing weakness.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3.4 and Appendix A, Eq. (52), Eqs. (A5)-(A10)] The NLO leading-logarithm result is derived under the hierarchy stated after Eq. (52), namely eps_B ~ m_g << q0(q) << T. The inputs used in Fig. 6 and Sec. 4 (alpha_s = 0.3, eps_B = 0.052 GeV, m_g ~ 1.5853 T) violate this hierarchy at both ends: at T = 300 MeV, m_g ~ 0.48 GeV is about nine times eps_B and is not small compared with T. In this regime the Appendix A replacements 1/2 + f(q0) ~ 1/(beta q0), Q^2 - G ~ Q^2, and the choice q = T as the integration cutoff are uncontrolled. Since the NLO c2^(2) shown in Fig. 6 is of the same order as the LO c2 in Fig. 5, the positive rho00 - 1/3 attributed to the NLO contribution is not quantitatively established.
  2. [Secs. 3.2 and 3.4; Figs. 6-8] The NLO calculation is performed as an expansion to O(delta_v^2), but the figures plot results up to delta_v = 3. If delta_v is the physical velocity, those values are superluminal; if delta_v is a rapidity-like variable, the O(delta_v^2) truncation is far outside its nominal regime. The numerical spin-alignment values in Fig. 8 therefore lie beyond the range in which the calculation can be trusted. The authors should restrict quantitative claims to small delta_v or supply a treatment valid at large delta_v.
  3. [Sec. 3.1, Fig. 4, and Sec. 5] The NLO dissociation rate keeps only the diagrams of Fig. 3 and drops the Compton and interference diagrams of Fig. 4. The text argues that these are parametrically suppressed or not logarithmically enhanced, but no estimate or bound for their numerical size is given. Given that the leading-log NLO term is a central part of the final spin-alignment prediction, an estimate of the omitted diagrams is needed before the sign and magnitude of c2^(2) can be considered robust.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Sec. 4] The text refers to the 'Milner coordinate'; this should be 'Milne coordinate'.
  2. [Sec. 5] 'chrmomagnetic' in the opening paragraph should be 'chromomagnetic'.
  3. [Sec. 3.1] 'assumtpion' should be 'assumption'.
  4. [Sec. 3.4] The phrase 'Simulating in J/psi's rest frame' is unclear; 'working in' or 'computed in' would be more precise.
  5. [Sec. 4, Eqs. (58)-(60)] The spin index i is used for the distribution functions, but efi(tau0) in Eq. (60) is not explicitly labeled by i; labeling all distribution functions with the same spin index would improve clarity.
  6. [Sec. 3.2] The covariant definition of q-hat_n is given in the text but should be stated in an equation, since it is used repeatedly in the moving-frame expressions.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the spin-alignment prediction is computed from derived dissociation rates, not fitted to spin-alignment data.

full rationale

The paper's central claim—positive rho00 - 1/3 from polarized dissociation—is obtained from an explicit pNRQCD calculation rather than from a fitted parameter or a self-citation. The spin-splitting coefficient c2 is computed numerically from Eq. (38) for the LO process and from Eq. (53) for the NLO process, using only stated inputs (alpha_s, m_c, epsilon_B, T, tau0, T0); it is never adjusted to reproduce experimental rho00 values. The final spin-alignment expression in Eqs. (61)-(62) follows by algebra from the dissociation rates and the angular factor 1/3 - (delta-v-hat · l-hat)^2, and the positive sign is a consequence of the computed negative c2 together with the directional average. Citations to earlier pNRQCD and HTL work (Brambilla et al., Le Bellac, Chen and He) are used only for standard framework ingredients and spin-averaged rates; no load-bearing claim rests on a self-citation, and no uniqueness theorem from the authors is invoked to force the result. The scale-hierarchy violation noted by the reader (mg ~ 1.5853T while Appendix A assumes eps_B ~ mg << q0 << T) is a validity or correctness concern about the NLO approximation, not a circularity: it does not make any output equal to an input by construction. The paper is therefore self-contained in its derivation of the sign and approximate magnitude of the spin alignment.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The calculation rests on a weak-coupling pNRQCD hierarchy, HTL-resummed gluon propagators, a leading-log approximation, and a simplified Bjorken transport model. Parameters alpha_s, m_c, epsilon_B, N_f, T0, tau0, and Tc are chosen by hand; epsilon_B is explicitly treated as a free parameter. No new particle, force, or dimension is introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • alpha_s = 0.3 or 0.4
    Strong coupling constant chosen for numerical demonstration; controls binding energy and thermal mass.
  • m_c = 1.3 GeV
    Charm quark mass input; sets the J/psi scale.
  • epsilon_B = 0.052 GeV (alpha_s=0.3), 0.0924 GeV (alpha_s=0.4)
    Binding energy of the 1S Coulombic state; footnote 4 explicitly treats it as a free parameter describing quarkonium structure.
  • N_f = 2 (implied)
    Active flavor number enters the HTL gluon mass; the text never states it, but m_g=1.5853T corresponds to N_f=2.
  • T0, tau0, Tc = 350 MeV, 0.6 fm/c, 150 MeV
    Initial and freeze-out conditions for the illustrative Bjorken flow; not fitted to spin data.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Weak-coupling pNRQCD hierarchy m_Q >> m_Q v >> m_Q v^2 and m_Q v >> T.
    Section 2 requires perturbative treatment; marginal for J/psi at T ~ 350 MeV.
  • standard math Temporal Axial Gauge A_0=0 and real-time ra-basis Feynman rules.
    Section 2 uses this to compute the self-energy; standard thermal field theory.
  • domain assumption HTL resummed gluon propagator and fluctuation-dissipation theorem.
    Eqs. (20)-(24); assumes a weakly coupled equilibrium QGP.
  • ad hoc to paper Leading-log approximation keeping only ln(T/epsilon_B) and ln(T/m_g), omitting Compton and interference diagrams.
    Section 3.1 and Appendix A; acknowledged as incomplete in Section 5.
  • ad hoc to paper Bjorken flow with Y=eta, spin-independent initial distribution, dissociation only.
    Section 4; used to obtain analytic evolution and to cancel spin-independent factors.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Polarized Dissociation and Spin Alignment of Moving Quarkonium in Quark-Gluon Plasma." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YDK6QTJX

@misc{pith2026250116596,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Polarized Dissociation and Spin Alignment of Moving Quarkonium in Quark-Gluon Plasma},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YDK6QTJX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.16596}
}
abstract

Recent experiments have found spin alignment of $J/\psi$ with respect to event plane in heavy ion collisions, suggesting a medium effect that is spin dependent. We propose a possible mechanism with polarized dissociation from the motion of $J/\psi$ with respect to the medium. We calculate polarized dissociation rate for quarkonium spin triplet state from spin chromomagnetic coupling in the potential non-relativistic QCD framework. This is done for the leading order gluo-dissociation process and next to leading order inelastic Coulomb scattering process. The polarized dissociation rate is expressed as a function of relative velocity between quarkonium and QGP and the quantization axis. Applying the polarized dissociation rate to quarkonium evolution with dissociation effect only in a Bjorken flow, we find the spin $0$ state to dissociate less than the other spin states, leading to positive $\rho_{00}-1/3$. Regeneration contribution is expected to give a contribution with the opposite sign.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.16596 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Feynman rules involving chromomagnetic part in pNRQCD with TAG. The curly line [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. One-loop self-energy diagram for quarkonium color singlet. The vertices correspond to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Effective one-loop self-energy diagram for quarkonium color singlet. The vertices corre [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Diagrams involving chromoelectric vertices and non-Abelian chromomagnetic vertices [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Numerical results of magnitude of splitting in dissociation rate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Numerical results of c (2) 2 for J/ψ, shows the dependence of c (2) 2 /δv2 on temperature T, the superscript (2) means the results take to O(δv 2 ) order. Theory uncertainty is estimated by varying the q-integration upper bound from T /2 to 2T (see the inset). We take …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Numerical fitting result of spin alignment of the LO process calculated in quarkonium’s [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Numerical results of spin alignment up to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Polarization of the $\phi$ meson in the hadronic phase with nucleon scatterings and a viscous hydrodynamic background

    hep-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Kaon and nucleon rescattering plus viscous corrections in a Fluidum hydrodynamic background yield phi spin alignment consistent with zero, in disagreement with STAR data.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [27]

    Gluo-dissociation of heavy quarkonium in the quark-gluon plasma reexamined

    Shile Chen and Min He. Gluo-dissociation of heavy quarkonium in the quark-gluon plasma reexamined. Phys. Rev. C, 96(3):034901, 2017

    work page 2017

  2. [1]

    Globally polarized quark-gluon plasma in non-central A+A collisions

    Zuo-Tang Liang and Xin-Nian Wang. Globally polarized quark-gluon plasma in non-central A+A collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett., 94:102301, 2005. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 96, 039901 (2006)]

    work page 2006

  3. [2]

    Spin alignment of vector mesons in non-central A+A collisions

    Zuo-Tang Liang and Xin-Nian Wang. Spin alignment of vector mesons in non-central A+A collisions. Phys. Lett. B, 629:20–26, 2005

    work page 2005

  4. [3]

    Adamczyk et al

    L. Adamczyk et al. Global Λ hyperon polarization in nuclear collisions: evidence for the most vortical fluid. Nature, 548:62–65, 2017

    work page 2017

  5. [4]

    Becattini, V

    F. Becattini, V. Chandra, L. Del Zanna, and E. Grossi. Relativistic distribution function for particles with spin at local thermodynamical equilibrium. Annals Phys., 338:32–49, 2013

    work page 2013

  6. [5]

    Polarization of massive fermions in a vortical fluid

    Ren-hong Fang, Long-gang Pang, Qun Wang, and Xin-nian Wang. Polarization of massive fermions in a vortical fluid. Phys. Rev. C, 94(2):024904, 2016

    work page 2016

  7. [6]

    Global Λ polarization in heavy-ion collisions from a transport model

    Hui Li, Long-Gang Pang, Qun Wang, and Xiao-Liang Xia. Global Λ polarization in heavy-ion collisions from a transport model. Phys. Rev. C, 96(5):054908, 2017

    work page 2017

  8. [7]

    Rotating quark-gluon plasma in relativistic heavy ion collisions

    Yin Jiang, Zi-Wei Lin, and Jinfeng Liao. Rotating quark-gluon plasma in relativistic heavy ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C, 94(4):044910, 2016. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.C 95, 049904 (2017)]

    work page 2017

Show all 45 references
  1. [8]

    Thermal vorticity and spin polarization in heavy-ion collisions

    De-Xian Wei, Wei-Tian Deng, and Xu-Guang Huang. Thermal vorticity and spin polarization in heavy-ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C, 99(1):014905, 2019

    2019

  2. [9]

    M. S. Abdallah et al. Pattern of global spin alignment of ϕ and K ∗0 mesons in heavy-ion collisions. Nature, 614(7947):244–248, 2023

    2023

  3. [10]

    Measurement of the J/ ψ Polarization with Respect to the Event Plane in Pb-Pb Collisions at the LHC

    Shreyasi Acharya et al. Measurement of the J/ ψ Polarization with Respect to the Event Plane in Pb-Pb Collisions at the LHC. Phys. Rev. Lett., 131(4):042303, 2023

    2023

  4. [11]

    Subrata Pal, C. M. Ko, and Zi-wei Lin. Phi meson production in relativistic heavy ion collisions. Nucl. Phys. A, 707:525–539, 2002

    2002

  5. [12]

    Spin Alignment of Vector Mesons in Heavy-Ion Collisions

    Xin-Li Sheng, Lucia Oliva, Zuo-Tang Liang, Qun Wang, and Xin-Nian Wang. Spin Alignment of Vector Mesons in Heavy-Ion Collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett., 131(4):042304, 2023

    2023

  6. [13]

    Momentum dependence of the spin alignment of the ϕ meson

    Xin-Li Sheng, Shi Pu, and Qun Wang. Momentum dependence of the spin alignment of the ϕ meson. Phys. Rev. C, 108(5):054902, 2023. 25

    2023

  7. [14]

    Spin alignment of vector mesons induced by local spin density fluctuations

    Kun Xu and Mei Huang. Spin alignment of vector mesons induced by local spin density fluctuations. Phys. Rev. D, 110(9):094034, 2024

    2024

  8. [15]

    Spin alignment of vector mesons by glasma fields

    Avdhesh Kumar, Berndt M¨ uller, and Di-Lun Yang. Spin alignment of vector mesons by glasma fields. Phys. Rev. D, 108(1):016020, 2023

    2023

  9. [16]

    Feng Li and Shuai Y. F. Liu. Tensor Polarization and Spectral Properties of Vector Meson in QCD Medium. 6 2022

    2022

  10. [17]

    Generating tensor polarization from shear stress

    David Wagner, Nora Weickgenannt, and Enrico Speranza. Generating tensor polarization from shear stress. Phys. Rev. Res., 5(1):013187, 2023

    2023

  11. [18]

    Holographic spin alignment for vector mesons

    Xin-Li Sheng, Yan-Qing Zhao, Si-Wen Li, Francesco Becattini, and Defu Hou. Holographic spin alignment for vector mesons. Phys. Rev. D, 110(5):056047, 2024

    2024

  12. [19]

    The spin alignment of vector mesons with light front quarks

    Baochi Fu, Fei Gao, Yu-Xin Liu, and Huichao Song. The spin alignment of vector mesons with light front quarks. Phys. Lett. B, 855:138821, 2024

    2024

  13. [20]

    Holographic spin alignment of J/ ψ meson in magnetized plasma

    Yan-Qing Zhao, Xin-Li Sheng, Si-Wen Li, and Defu Hou. Holographic spin alignment of J/ ψ meson in magnetized plasma. JHEP, 08:070, 2024

    2024

  14. [21]

    Vector meson’s spin alignments in high energy reactions

    Jin-Hui Chen, Zuo-Tang Liang, Yu-Gang Ma, Xin-Li Sheng, and Qun Wang. Vector meson’s spin alignments in high energy reactions. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron., 68(1):211001, 2025

    2025

  15. [22]

    Braun-Munzinger and J

    P. Braun-Munzinger and J. Stachel. (Non)thermal aspects of charmonium production and a new look at J / psi suppression. Phys. Lett. B, 490:196–202, 2000

    2000

  16. [23]

    Transverse Momentum Spectra of J/ψ in Heavy-Ion Collisions

    Xingbo Zhao and Ralf Rapp. Transverse Momentum Spectra of J/ψ in Heavy-Ion Collisions. Phys. Lett. B, 664:253–257, 2008

    2008

  17. [24]

    Medium effects on charmonium production at ultrarelativistic energies available at the CERN Large Hadron Collider

    Kai Zhou, Nu Xu, Zhe Xu, and Pengfei Zhuang. Medium effects on charmonium production at ultrarelativistic energies available at the CERN Large Hadron Collider. Phys. Rev. C, 89(5):054911, 2014

    2014

  18. [25]

    Bodwin, Eric Braaten, and G

    Geoffrey T. Bodwin, Eric Braaten, and G. Peter Lepage. Rigorous QCD analysis of inclu- sive annihilation and production of heavy quarkonium. Phys. Rev. D, 51:1125–1171, 1995. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 55, 5853 (1997)]

    1997

  19. [26]

    Effective Field Theories for Heavy Quarkonium

    Nora Brambilla, Antonio Pineda, Joan Soto, and Antonio Vairo. Effective Field Theories for Heavy Quarkonium. Rev. Mod. Phys., 77:1423, 2005. 26

    2005

  20. [28]

    Quarkonium polarization in medium from open quantum systems and chromomagnetic correlators

    Di-Lun Yang and Xiaojun Yao. Quarkonium polarization in medium from open quantum systems and chromomagnetic correlators. Phys. Rev. D, 110(7):074037, 2024

    2024

  21. [29]

    Hadronic Transitions Between Heavy Quark States in Quantum Chromody- namics

    Tung-Mow Yan. Hadronic Transitions Between Heavy Quark States in Quantum Chromody- namics. Phys. Rev. D, 22:1652, 1980

    1980

  22. [30]

    Perturbative Ther- mal QCD: Formalism and Applications

    Jacopo Ghiglieri, Aleksi Kurkela, Michael Strickland, and Aleksi Vuorinen. Perturbative Ther- mal QCD: Formalism and Applications. Phys. Rept., 880:1–73, 2020

    2020

  23. [31]

    Gyan Bhanot and Michael E. Peskin. Short Distance Analysis for Heavy Quark Systems. 2. Applications. Nucl. Phys. B, 156:391–416, 1979

    1979

  24. [32]

    Michael E. Peskin. Short Distance Analysis for Heavy Quark Systems. 1. Diagrammatics. Nucl. Phys. B, 156:365–390, 1979

    1979

  25. [33]

    Quarkonium-hadron interactions in perturbative QCD

    Taesoo Song and Su Houng Lee. Quarkonium-hadron interactions in perturbative QCD. Phys. Rev. D, 72:034002, 2005

    2005

  26. [34]

    Grandchamp and R

    L. Grandchamp and R. Rapp. Thermal versus direct J / Psi production in ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions. Phys. Lett. B, 523:60–66, 2001

    2001

  27. [35]

    Grandchamp and R

    L. Grandchamp and R. Rapp. Charmonium suppression and regeneration from SPS to RHIC. Nucl. Phys. A, 709:415–439, 2002

    2002

  28. [36]

    Heavy quarkonium dissociation by thermal gluons at next-to-leading order in the Quark–Gluon Plasma

    Shile Chen and Min He. Heavy quarkonium dissociation by thermal gluons at next-to-leading order in the Quark–Gluon Plasma. Phys. Lett. B, 786:260–267, 2018

    2018

  29. [37]

    Second-order dissociation and transition of heavy quarkonia in the quark-gluon plasma

    Shouxing Zhao and Min He. Second-order dissociation and transition of heavy quarkonia in the quark-gluon plasma. Phys. Rev. D, 110(7):074040, 2024

    2024

  30. [38]

    Thermal width and gluo-dissociation of quarkonium in pNRQCD

    Nora Brambilla, Miguel Angel Escobedo, Jacopo Ghiglieri, and Antonio Vairo. Thermal width and gluo-dissociation of quarkonium in pNRQCD. JHEP, 12:116, 2011

    2011

  31. [39]

    Thermal width and quarkonium dissociation by inelastic parton scattering

    Nora Brambilla, Miguel Angel Escobedo, Jacopo Ghiglieri, and Antonio Vairo. Thermal width and quarkonium dissociation by inelastic parton scattering. JHEP, 05:130, 2013

    2013

  32. [40]

    Heavy Quarkonium in a weakly-coupled quark-gluon plasma below the melting temperature

    Nora Brambilla, Miguel Angel Escobedo, Jacopo Ghiglieri, Joan Soto, and Antonio Vairo. Heavy Quarkonium in a weakly-coupled quark-gluon plasma below the melting temperature. JHEP, 09:038, 2010. 27

    2010

  33. [41]

    Quarkonium inside the quark-gluon plasma: Diffusion, dis- sociation, recombination, and energy loss

    Xiaojun Yao and Berndt M¨ uller. Quarkonium inside the quark-gluon plasma: Diffusion, dis- sociation, recombination, and energy loss. Phys. Rev. D, 100(1):014008, 2019

    2019

  34. [42]

    Thermal Field Theory

    Michel Le Bellac. Thermal Field Theory. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 3 2011

    2011

  35. [43]

    G. Baym. THERMAL EQUILIBRATION IN ULTRARELATIVISTIC HEA VY ION COLLI- SIONS. Phys. Lett. B, 138:18–22, 1984

    1984

  36. [44]

    Non- conformal kinetic theory and hydrodynamics for Bjorken flow

    Sunil Jaiswal, Chandrodoy Chattopadhyay, Lipei Du, Ulrich Heinz, and Subrata Pal. Non- conformal kinetic theory and hydrodynamics for Bjorken flow. Phys. Rev. C, 105(2):024911, 2022

    2022

  37. [45]

    J/psi transport in QGP and p(t) distribution at SPS and RHIC

    Xiang-lei Zhu, Peng-fei Zhuang, and Nu Xu. J/psi transport in QGP and p(t) distribution at SPS and RHIC. Phys. Lett. B, 607:107–114, 2005. 28

    2005

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.