Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 38 references

Modular covariant torus partition functions of dense $A_1^{(1)}$ and dilute $A_2^{(2)}$ loop models

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The dense and dilute loop models have identical conformal torus partition functions for every coprime pair (p,p') with p/p' in (0,1), evidence they lie in the same logarithmic universality class.

desk verdict A careful, honest conditional result: the conjecture is the whole ballgame, and the evidence is decent but not conclusive. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.19288 v1 pith:E5R7U3DZ submitted 2025-01-31 math-ph cond-mat.stat-mechhep-thmath.MP

Alexi Morin-Duchesne , Andreas Klümper , Paul A. Pearce This is my paper · ORCID
classification math-phcond-mat.stat-mechhep-thmath.MP MSC 81T4082B2081R12
keywords logarithmicminimalmodelstoruspartitionfunctionsmodularcovarianceTemperley-LiebalgebrasCoulombgasaffineu(1)charactersBezoutconjugatesloop
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether two microscopically different integrable loop models—the dense A1^(1) model and the dilute A2^(2) model—flow to the same continuum theory. It argues that they do: for every coprime pair (p,p') with p/p' in (0,1), the four conformal torus partition functions obtained from periodic and antiperiodic boundary conditions coincide exactly. The equality is derived from a conjectured Gaussian form for the scaling limits of transfer-matrix traces in standard modules, converted to partition functions by Markov traces. If correct, the result unifies the logarithmic conformal field theories LM(p,p') and DLM(p,p') (non-unitary CFTs with Jordan-block structure), including critical polymers and percolation, and supplies explicit modular-covariant partition functions for the 6-vertex and Izergin-Korepin 19-vertex models at $\alpha$=2.

What carries the argument

The argument runs through standard modules of the periodic Temperley-Lieb algebra (dense case) and the dilute periodic Temperley-Lieb algebra (dilute case), labelled by the number $d$ of defects. The transfer matrix acts on these modules, and a Markov trace—a linear functional converting transfer-matrix traces into loop-weighted torus partition functions—weights non-contractible loops by Chebyshev polynomials $T_{d\wedge j}(\alpha/2)$. The load-bearing input is Conjecture 1, which fixes the scaling limit of each standard-module trace as a Gaussian series in $q$ and $\bar q$ with conformal dimensions depending only on the ratio $p/p'$. That Gaussian series is exactly the Coulomb-gas function $Z_{d,j}(p/(4p'))$. For the $\alpha$=2 specialization, Bezout conjugation—implemented by a conjugator $\omega_0$ and a possible half-period shift $\mu$—maps Kac labels to affine u(1) indices and turns the partition functions into sesquilinear forms in affine u(1) characters.

What would settle it

For a coprime pair not already checked, say (p,p')=(3,4), solve the logarithmic Bethe ansatz equations for the dense or dilute transfer matrix in a defect sector such as d=1 at the isotropic point, and compare the lowest scaling dimensions with the q-expansion predicted by equation (4.1); any mismatch in an exponent or degeneracy refutes the conjecture and the equality.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is the identity in equation (4.7): $Z_{\mathrm{dense}}^{(h,v)} = Z_{\mathrm{dilute}}^{(h,v)} = \sum_{d\in 2\mathbb{Z}+h,\, j\in 2\mathbb{Z}+v} 2 T_{d\wedge j}(\alpha/2)\, Z_{d,j}(p/(4p'))$, where $T_n$ is the Chebyshev polynomial and $Z_{m,m'}$ is the Coulomb-gas function. All four combinations of periodic and antiperiodic boundary conditions match, so the dense and dilute loop models carry the same modular-covariant torus data. The paper reads this coincidence as strong evidence that LM(p,p') and DLM(p,p') belong to the same logarithmic universality class. For $\alpha$=2 the partition functions are rewritten as finite sesquilinear forms in affine u(1) characters, using integer and half-integer Bezout conjugate pairs; these forms also give the modular-covariant partition functions of the 6-vertex and Izergin-Korepin 19-vertex models at roots of unity. Every explicit formula is conditional on the conjectured scaling limits in equation (4.1).

Load-bearing premise

Everything rests on Conjecture 1, which assumes that in the continuum limit each standard-module transfer-matrix trace takes the specific Gaussian form of equation (4.1); if that trace formula fails in any defect sector, the dense-dilute equality of partition functions does not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Critical dense polymers, dilute polymers, bond percolation, and site percolation are all placed in one family of logarithmic universality classes indexed by coprime p and p'.
  • The sum over boundary conditions of the four partition functions reproduces the O(n) Coulomb-gas partition function, linking the loop-model calculation directly to the Coulomb-gas formalism.
  • At alpha=2, the same sesquilinear forms give explicit modular-covariant torus partition functions for the 6-vertex and Izergin-Korepin 19-vertex models at roots of unity.
  • The modular action on the four (h,v) sectors is a four-dimensional representation with Z^{(0,0)} modular invariant, the other three sectors covariant, and T acting as an involution.
  • The alpha=2 result appears to rule out identifying critical percolation with the c=0 triplet model, since the affine u(1) character form selects the value n_{p,p'}=-1.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the partition-function identity reflects a deeper equivalence, the dense and dilute models should also share modular S-matrices, fusion rules, and geometric exponents; the affine u(1) rewriting gives a concrete tool to compute and compare those quantities.
  • The appearance of half-integer Bezout conjugates for odd p suggests that other torus boundary conditions, such as seams with Z_N twists, will require affine u(1) indices with larger denominators, and the same conjugation machinery could be extended to build those partition functions.
  • A lattice-level relation between the dense and dilute transfer matrices might explain why a single Gaussian ansatz serves both models; finding such a relation would promote the conjectured scaling equality to a finite-size statement.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the dense A_1^{(1)} and dilute A_2^{(2)} loop models on an MxN torus with four combinations of periodic/antiperiodic boundary conditions (h,v). Its central input, Conjecture 1 (eq. 4.1), postulates explicit Gaussian/free-boson scaling limits for transfer-matrix traces in the standard modules W_{N,d,omega}. Assuming this conjecture, Markov traces yield conformal partition functions Z_dense^{(h,v)} and Z_dilute^{(h,v)}, and the paper finds the remarkable identity Z_dense^{(h,v)} = Z_dilute^{(h,v)} in eq. (4.7), expressed through the Coulomb-gas functions Z_{m,m'}(g). Sections 5 and 6 rewrite these objects as sesquilinear forms in Verma characters and, for alpha=2, in affine u(1) characters using generalized Bezout conjugates. Appendix A proves that the summed dilute partition function coincides with the O(n) partition function of Di Francesco, Saleur and Zuber. The authors interpret the dense-dilute coincidence as compelling evidence that the logarithmic minimal models LM(p,p') and DLM(p,p') lie in the same universality class.

Significance. If Conjecture 1 is correct, the paper provides explicit modular covariant torus partition functions for an infinite family of logarithmic minimal models, establishes a surprising dense-dilute coincidence, and connects the results to the 6-vertex and Izergin-Korepin 19-vertex models at alpha=2. The formal consequences are worked out with care: the number-theoretic proof in Appendix A identifying the summed partition function with the DFSZ O(n) result is nontrivial, and the modular covariance transformations (4.9)-(4.10) are derived cleanly. The paper is also honest about the conditional nature of its main results, and it ships no free parameters. However, because the central structures rest on an unproven conjecture with direct checks only at (1,2) and (2,3) plus the even-M dense case, the headline claims remain conditional.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4, Conjecture 1 (eq. 4.1)] This conjecture is the sole load-bearing input, and the paper itself acknowledges that the subsequent derivations are conditional on it. The evidence in Section 7 covers the even-M dense case via the Pasquier-Saleur XXZ result, the identity of the summed partition function with the DFSZ O(n) partition function, and analytic/numerical checks only for (p,p')=(1,2) and (2,3). No direct check is provided for any other coprime pair. Because the dense parity factor (1+(-1)^{M+j}) and the dilute ℓ-step-2 structure in (4.1) are exactly what makes the dense-dilute equality (4.7) hold, a failure of Conjecture 1 for some unchecked (p,p') would invalidate the paper's central claim. I request at least one additional independent check, for example a Bethe-ansatz or numerical diagonalization study for (3,4) or (3,5), or an explicit and prominent restatement that the dense-dilute equality is a conjecture-driven conditional result rather than an established theorem.
  2. [Section 4, eqs. (4.4)-(4.6)] The derivation of the limiting coefficients C_{d,j} from the conjectured trace formula interchanges the thermodynamic limit with the Fourier integral in (3.4). This interchange requires a justification, such as dominated convergence or a uniform bound on the finite-size traces, which is not supplied. The resulting formulas for C_{d,j} are therefore an additional technical assumption, albeit a mild one once (4.1) is granted. Please either provide the missing argument or state explicitly that this interchange is part of the conjecture.
  3. [Section 7 and Abstract] The conclusion that equality of the four torus partition functions constitutes 'compelling evidence' for the same universality class is defensible, but the phrase 'strong form of universality' goes beyond what the presented data establish. Torus partition functions probe the spectrum and modular structure; they do not fix Jordan-cell degeneracies or fusion data that distinguish logarithmic CFTs. I recommend softening the wording to 'consistent with, and strongly suggestive of, a common universality class' unless additional logarithmic data are supplied.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Appendix C, eq. (C.5a)] The term '2|κ^{24,+}_6(q)|^2(\bar q)' appears to be a typo; it should presumably be '2|κ^{24,+}_6(q)|^2'.
  2. [Appendix C, eq. (C.6b)] The string '2κ 2660,−(q)κ 60,− 14 (¯q)' is garbled and should be '2κ^{60,-}_{26}(q)κ^{60,-}_{14}(\bar q)'.
  3. [Eq. (6.22)] The notation '2p′−1/2∑' for the summation over half-integer s is confusing; the range should be written explicitly, for example s=0,1/2,1,...,p′−1/2.
  4. [References] Reference [38] cites Wikipedia for Bezout's identity; a standard number theory textbook would be more appropriate in a journal article.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the dense–dilute identity follows from an explicitly stated trace-scaling conjecture, not from the target result; self-citations are supporting only.

full rationale

The derivation chain is transparent: Section 4 states Conjecture 1 (eq. 4.1), postulating the scaling limits of transfer-matrix traces in the standard modules. Sections 4–6 and the appendices then derive, by explicit Gaussian integration and Markov-trace algebra, the conformal partition functions and the dense–dilute equality (4.7). The equality is not assumed as an input; it emerges from substituting the two conjectured trace formulae into the Markov-trace expressions (3.5a)–(3.5b), with the dense parity factor (1+(-1)^{M+j}) and the dilute extra factor 2 combining with the parity-restricted sums to give the same 2 T_{d∧j}(α/2) Z_{d,j}(p/(4p')). Thus the central claim is conditional on Conjecture 1, exactly as the paper states: 'The results of this paper hinge on our key conjecture (4.1)'. This is an honest, explicit conjecture, not a hidden assumption of the target result. The supporting evidence includes external benchmarks: agreement with Pasquier–Saleur for the dense even-M case (ref. [36]) and the nontrivial proof in Appendix A that the summed partition function equals the O(n) Coulomb-gas partition function of Di Francesco–Saleur–Zuber (ref. [27]). The self-citations ([8,9,11,18]) are used for specific cases and for comparison with previously conjectured affine u(1) forms, but they are not load-bearing for the main equality; the derivation would stand or fall with Conjecture 1 and the external checks. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem from the authors is invoked, and no known result is merely relabelled. The paper's main limitation is that Conjecture 1 remains unproven for general (p,p'), but a limitation of this kind is a correctness risk, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on Conjecture 1, which is an unproved, paper-specific assumption. Background uses standard Temperley-Lieb representation theory and Coulomb gas results. No free parameters are fitted, and no new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (3)
  • ad hoc to paper Conjecture 1 (eq 4.1): the scaling limits of the transfer matrix traces in the standard modules take the stated Gaussian/Verma character forms
    This unproved conjecture is the load-bearing input. All derived partition functions and the dense/dilute equality depend on it. The paper provides supporting evidence but no proof.
  • domain assumption The root-of-unity dense and dilute loop models are described by the logarithmic minimal models LM(p,p') and DLM(p,p') with central charge (1.1)
    This is standard in the logarithmic CFT literature and defines the models studied; the paper relies on it throughout.
  • domain assumption Markov trace relation (3.5) connecting partition functions to transfer matrix traces
    For the dense model this goes back to Jacobsen-Richard [32]; for the dilute model it is argued in [18] and extended here. The factor of 2 for dilute is taken from prior work.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Modular covariant torus partition functions of dense $A_1^{(1)}$ and dilute $A_2^{(2)}$ loop models." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/E5R7U3DZ

@misc{pith2026250119288,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Modular covariant torus partition functions of dense $A_1^(1)$ and dilute $A_2^(2)$ loop models},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/E5R7U3DZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.19288}
}
abstract

Yang-Baxter integrable dense $A_1^{(1)}$ and dilute $A_2^{(2)}$ loop models are considered on the torus in their simplest physical regimes. A combination of boundary conditions $(h,v)$ is applied in the horizontal and vertical directions with $h,v=0$ and $1$ for periodic and antiperiodic boundary conditions respectively. The fugacities of non-contractible and contractible loops are denoted by $\alpha$ and $\beta$ respectively where $\beta$ is simply related to the crossing parameter $\lambda$. At roots of unity, when $\lambda/\pi\in\mathbb Q$, these models are the dense ${\cal LM}(p,p')$ and dilute ${\cal DLM}(p,p')$ logarithmic minimal models with $p,p'$ coprime integers. We conjecture the scaling limits of the transfer matrix traces in the standard modules with $d$ defects and deduce the conformal partition functions ${\cal Z}_{\textrm{dense}}^{(h,v)}(\alpha)$ and ${\cal Z}_{\textrm{dilute}}^{(h,v)}(\alpha)$ using Markov traces. These are expressed in terms of functions ${\cal Z}_{m,m'}(g)$ known from the Coulomb gas arguments of Di Francesco, Saleur and Zuber and subsequently as sesquilinear forms in Verma characters. Crucially, we find that the partition functions are identical for the dense and dilute models. The coincidence of these conformal partition functions provides compelling evidence that, for given $(p,p')$, these dense and dilute theories lie in the same universality class. In root of unity cases with $\alpha=2$, the $(h,v)$ modular covariant partition functions are also expressed as sesquilinear forms in affine $u(1)$ characters involving generalized Bezout conjugates. These also give the modular covariant partition functions for the 6-vertex and Izergin-Korepin 19-vertex models in the corresponding regimes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.19288 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Typical configurations of the dense (left panels) a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Example loop configurations for the dilute [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Kac tables of Bezout conjugates {j, j} [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Kac tables of Bezout conjugates {j, j} for (p, p′ ) = (4, 5), for h = 0 in the left panel and h = 1 in the right panel, with ω0 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages

  1. [18]

    Critical site percolation on the triangular lattice: From integrability to conformal partition functions

    A. Morin-Duchesne, A. Kl¨ umper, P.A. Pearce, Critical site percolation on the triangular lattice: From integrability to conformal partition functions , arXiv:2211.12379 [math-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv

  2. [1]

    Baxter, Exactly Solved Models in Statistical Mechanics , Academic Press (1982)

    R.J. Baxter, Exactly Solved Models in Statistical Mechanics , Academic Press (1982). 31

    work page 1982

  3. [2]

    Nienhuis, Exact critical point and critical exponents of O(n) models in two dimensions , Phys

    B. Nienhuis, Exact critical point and critical exponents of O(n) models in two dimensions , Phys. Rev. Lett. 49 (1982) 1062–1065

    work page 1982

  4. [3]

    Nienhuis, H.W.J

    B. Nienhuis, H.W.J. Bl¨ ote, Critical behaviour and conformal anomaly of the O(n) model on the square lattice, J. Phys. A 22 (1989) 1415–1438

    work page 1989

  5. [4]

    Yung, M.T

    C.M. Yung, M.T. Batchelor, Integrable vertex and loop models on the square lattice with o pen boundaries via reflection matrices , Nucl. Phys. B435 (1995) 430–462, arXiv:hep-th/9410042

    arXiv 1995

  6. [5]

    Pearce, J

    P.A. Pearce, J. Rasmussen, J.-B. Zuber, Logarithmic minimal models , J. Stat. Mech. (2006) P11017, arXiv:hep-th/0607232

    arXiv 2006

  7. [6]

    Pearce, J

    P.A. Pearce, J. Rasmussen, Solvable critical dense polymers , J. Stat. Mech. (2007) P02015, arXiv:hep-th/0610273

    arXiv 2007

  8. [7]

    Geometric Exponents, SLE and Logarithmic Minimal Models

    Y. Saint-Aubin, P.A. Pearce, J. Rasmussen, Geometric exponents, SLE and logarithmic minimal models, J. Stat. Mech. (2009) P02028, arXiv:0809.4806 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2009

Show all 38 references
  1. [8]

    Pearce, J

    P.A. Pearce, J. Rasmussen, Coset graphs in bulk and boundary logarithmic minimal models , Nucl. Phys. B 846 (2011) 616–649, arXiv:1010.5328 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Morin-Duchesne, P.A

    A. Morin-Duchesne, P.A. Pearce, J. Rasmussen, Modular invariant partition function of critical dense polymers, Nucl. Phys. B 874 (2013) 312–357, arXiv:1303.4895 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Morin-Duchesne, P.A

    A. Morin-Duchesne, P.A. Pearce, J. Rasmussen, Fusion hierarchies, T -systems, and Y -systems of logarithmic minimal models , J. Stat. Mech. (2014) P05012, arXiv:1401.7750 [math-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Morin-Duchesne, A

    A. Morin-Duchesne, A. Kl¨ umper, P.A. Pearce, Conformal partition functions of critical percolation from D3 thermodynamic Bethe Ansatz equations , J. Stat. Mech. (2017) 083101, arXiv:1701.08167 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2017 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Dubail, J.L

    J. Dubail, J.L. Jacobsen, H. Saleur, Conformal boundary conditions in the critical O(n) models and dilute loop models , Nucl. Phys. B827 (2010) 457–502, arXiv:0905.1382 [math-ph]

    2010 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Provencher, Y

    G. Provencher, Y. Saint-Aubin, P.A. Pearce, J. Rasmuss en, Geometric exponents of dilute loop models, J. Stat. Phys. 147 (2012) 315–350, arXiv:1109.0653 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2012 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Garbali, Dilute O(1) loop model on a strip and the qKZ equations , Master Thesis, University of Amsterdam (2012)

    A. Garbali, Dilute O(1) loop model on a strip and the qKZ equations , Master Thesis, University of Amsterdam (2012)

    2012

  8. [15]

    Feh´ er, B

    G.Z. Feh´ er, B. Nienhuis, Currents in the dilute O(n = 1) loop model, arXiv:1510.02721 [math-ph]

    arXiv

  9. [16]

    Garbali, B

    A. Garbali, B. Nienhuis, The dilute Temperley–Lieb O(n = 1) loop model on a semi infinite strip: the ground state , J. Stat. Mech. (2017) 043108, arXiv:1411.7020 [math-ph] ; The dilute Temperley–Lieb O(n = 1) loop model on a semi infinite strip: the sum rule , J. Stat. Mech. (20...

    2017 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Morin-Duchesne, P.A

    A. Morin-Duchesne, P.A. Pearce, Fusion hierarchies, T -systems and Y -systems for the dilute A(2) 2 loop models, J. Stat. Mech. (2019) 094007, arXiv:1905.07973 [math-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Di Francesco, P

    P. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu and D. S´ en´ echal,Conformal Field Theory , Springer (1997). 32

    1997

  12. [20]

    Moore, N

    G. Moore, N. Seiberg, Classical and quantum conformal field theory , Comm. Math. Phys. 123 (1989) 177–254

    1989

  13. [21]

    Gurarie, Logarithmic operators in conformal field theory , Nucl

    V. Gurarie, Logarithmic operators in conformal field theory , Nucl. Phys. B410 (1993) 535–549, arXiv:hep-th/9303160

    1993 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Gainutdinov, D

    A. Gainutdinov, D. Ridout, I. Runkel (editors), Special issue on logarithmic conformal field theory , J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 46 (49) 490301 (2013)

    2013

  15. [23]

    Belavin, A.M

    A.A. Belavin, A.M. Polyakov, A.B. Zamolodchikov, Infinite conformal symmetry in two- dimensional quantum field theory , Nucl. Phys. B241 (1984) 333–380

    1984

  16. [24]

    Andrews, R.J

    G.E. Andrews, R.J. Baxter, P.J. Forrester, Eight-vertex SOS model and generalized Rogers- Ramanujan-type identities, J. Stat. Phys. 35 (1984) 193–266

    1984

  17. [25]

    Forrester, R.J

    P.J. Forrester, R.J. Baxter, Further exact solutions of the eight-vertex SOS model and generalizations of the Rogers-Ramanujan identities , J. Stat. Phys. 38 (1985) 435–472

    1985

  18. [26]

    Di Francesco, H

    P. Di Francesco, H. Saleur, J.B. Zuber, Modular invariance in non-minimal two-dimensional conformal theories, Nucl. Phys. B285 (1987) 454–480

    1987

  19. [27]

    Di Francesco, H

    P. Di Francesco, H. Saleur, J.B. Zuber, Relations between the Coulomb gas picture and conformal invariance of two-dimensional critical models , J. Stat. Phys. 49 (1987) 57–79

    1987

  20. [28]

    Levy, Algebraic structure of translation-invariant spin- 1 2 XXZ and q-Potts quantum chains , Phys

    D. Levy, Algebraic structure of translation-invariant spin- 1 2 XXZ and q-Potts quantum chains , Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 (1991) 1971–1974

    1991

  21. [29]

    Martin, H

    P. Martin, H. Saleur, On an algebraic approach to higher dimensional statistical mechanics, Commun. Math. Phys. 158 (1993) 155–190, arXiv:hep-th/9208061

    1993 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Graham, G.I

    J.J. Graham, G.I. Lehrer, The representation theory of affine Temperley–Lieb algebras , Enseign. Math. 44 (1998) 173–218

    1998

  23. [31]

    Pearce, J

    P.A. Pearce, J. Rasmussen, S.P. Villani, Solvable dense polymers on the cylinder , J. Stat. Mech. (2010) P02010, arXiv:0910.4444 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Richard, J.L

    J.F. Richard, J.L. Jacobsen, Eigenvalue amplitudes of the Potts model on a torus , Nucl. Phys. B769 (2007) 256–274, arXiv:math-ph/0608055 [math-ph]

    2007 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Kim, P.A

    D. Kim, P.A. Pearce, Scaling dimensions and conformal anomaly in anisotropic la ttice spin models, J. Phys. A 20 (1987) L451

    1987

  26. [34]

    N. Read, H. Saleur, Exact spectra of conformal supersymmetric nonlinear sigma models in two dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B613 (2001) 409–444, arXiv:hep-th/0106124

    2001 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Deguchi, K

    T. Deguchi, K. Fabricius, B.M. McCoy. The sl2 loop algebra symmetry of the six-vertex model at roots of unity , J. Stat. Phys. 102 (2001) 701–736, arXiv:cond-mat/9912141

    2001 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Pasquier, H

    V. Pasquier, H. Saleur, Common structures between finite systems and conformal field t heories through quantum groups , Nucl. Phys. B330 (1990) 523–556

    1990

  29. [37]

    Gaberdiel, I

    M.R. Gaberdiel, I. Runkel, S.Wood, A modular invariant bulk theory for the c = 0 triplet model , J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 44 (2011) 015204

    2011

  30. [38]

    Wikipedia: The Free Encyclopedia, Wikimedia Foundati on Inc., https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bezouts_identity. 33

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.