REVIEW 3 cited by
RPGBENCH: Evaluating Large Language Models as Role-Playing Game Engines
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We present RPGBench, the first benchmark designed to evaluate large language models (LLMs) as text-based role-playing game (RPG) engines. RPGBench comprises two core tasks: Game Creation (GC) and Game Simulation (GS). In GC, an LLM must craft a valid and playable RPG world using a structured event-state representation, ensuring logical coherence and proper termination conditions. In GS, the LLM simulates interactive gameplay across multiple rounds while consistently updating states and enforcing game rules. To comprehensively assess performance, RPGBench integrates objective and subjective evaluation methodologies. Objective measures verify adherence to event mechanics and check variable updates without requiring human intervention. Subjective measures, such as content interestingness, action quality, and role-playing capability, are evaluated via an LLM-as-a-judge framework, where a strong LLM grades each candidate's outputs. Empirical results demonstrate that state-of-the-art LLMs can produce engaging stories but often struggle to implement consistent, verifiable game mechanics, particularly in long or complex scenarios. By combining structured, rule-based assessments with LLM-based judgments, RPGBench provides a new standard for evaluating how well LLMs can balance creativity, coherence, and complexity in text-based RPGs, opening avenues for more immersive and controllable interactive storytelling.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Mastering PokeGym: Graph-Guided Multimodal Evolution at Test Time
The manuscript body introduces PokeGym, a vision-only automated 3D-game benchmark, while the abstract claims a G-EvoMAC method and 60.18% success rate absent from the body.
-
What to Ask Next? Probing the Imaginative Reasoning of LLMs with TurtleSoup Puzzles
TurtleSoup-Bench is a new interactive benchmark showing that LLMs struggle with imaginative reasoning compared to humans.
-
State-Inference-Based Prompting for Natural Language Trading with Game NPCs
A prompt framework that makes LLM game merchants follow a six-state trading flow achieves over 97% state compliance, over 95% item accuracy, and 99.7% price accuracy in simulated dialogues.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.