pith. sign in

arxiv: 2502.01323 · v2 · pith:EUJP7Q3Qnew · submitted 2025-02-03 · ✦ hep-th · math.AG· math.QA· math.RT

Quiver Yangians as Coulomb branch algebras

Tiantai Chen , Wei Li This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 03:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th math.AGmath.QAmath.RT
keywords quiver YangianCoulomb branch algebra3D N=4 gauge theoryvortex configurationsmonopole operatorsOmega-backgroundtriple quivertree-type quivers
0
0 comments X

The pith

The quantum Coulomb branch algebra of 3D N=4 unitary quiver theories equals the truncated shifted quiver Yangian.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper conjectures that the quantum Coulomb branch algebra, obtained by deforming the Coulomb branch chiral ring with an Omega-background, equals the truncated shifted quiver Yangian built from the triple quiver of the original quiver. The identification is checked explicitly for tree-type quivers by studying how monopoles act on 1/2-BPS vortex configurations, where the Hilbert spaces approaching different vacua supply representations and the charge functions exhibit only simple poles. A sympathetic reader would care because the conjecture supplies an explicit algebraic presentation of the deformed Coulomb branch in terms of a known combinatorial object. The claim is stated to remain consistent with existing results on selected non-tree examples.

Core claim

The central claim is that for a 3D N=4 quiver gauge theory with unitary gauge group, the quantum Coulomb branch algebra can be formulated as the truncated shifted quiver Yangian Y(ˆQ,ˆW) based on the triple quiver ˆQ of the original quiver Q with canonical potential ˆW. This formulation is verified for general tree-type quivers by examining the action of monopoles on 1/2-BPS vortex configurations, with the vortex Hilbert spaces furnishing representations of the Yangian.

What carries the argument

The truncated shifted quiver Yangian Y(ˆQ,ˆW), which encodes the relations among monopole operators and vector-multiplet scalars through their action on vortex states.

If this is right

  • The Hilbert spaces of vortices approaching different vacua furnish different representations of the shifted quiver Yangian.
  • All charge functions have only simple poles for tree-type quivers.
  • The conjecture is consistent with known results on special examples beyond tree-type quivers.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same monopole-vortex dictionary could be used to extract explicit bases or structure constants for the algebra in concrete models.
  • The restriction to unitary gauge groups leaves open whether the identification extends immediately to orthogonal or symplectic groups.
  • If the conjecture holds, the truncation parameters of the Yangian should be determined by the ranks of the gauge nodes in a uniform way.

Load-bearing premise

The identification holds because the action of monopoles on 1/2-BPS vortex configurations generates the full algebra, with all charge functions having only simple poles.

What would settle it

An explicit computation for any tree-type quiver that produces a charge function with a pole of order greater than one, or that shows the monopole operators fail to satisfy the Yangian relations, would disprove the conjecture.

read the original abstract

For a 3D N=4 gauge theory, turning on the $\Omega$-background in RxR$^2_{\epsilon}$ deforms the Coulomb branch chiral ring into the quantum Coulomb branch algebra, generated by the 1/2-BPS monopoles together with the complex scalar in the vector-multiplet. We conjecture that for a 3D N=4 quiver gauge theory with unitary gauge group, the quantum Coulomb branch algebra can be formulated as the truncated shifted quiver Yangian Y$(\widehat{Q},\widehat{W})$ based on the triple quiver $\widehat{Q}$ of the original quiver Q with canonical potential $\widehat{W}$. We check this conjecture explicitly for general tree-type quivers Q by considering the action of monopoles on the 1/2-BPS vortex configurations. The Hilbert spaces of vortices approaching different vacua at spatial infinity furnish different representations of the shifted quiver Yangian, and all the charge functions have only simple poles. For quivers beyond tree-type, our conjecture is consistent with known results on special examples.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript conjectures that for a 3D N=4 quiver gauge theory with unitary gauge group, the quantum Coulomb branch algebra (generated by 1/2-BPS monopoles and the vector-multiplet scalar in the Ω-background) is given by the truncated shifted quiver Yangian Y(ˆQ, ˆW) built from the triple quiver ˆQ of the original quiver Q with canonical potential ˆW. The conjecture is verified explicitly for general tree-type quivers by computing the action of monopole operators on 1/2-BPS vortex Hilbert spaces (approaching distinct vacua at infinity), which furnish representations whose charge functions have only simple poles and generate the full algebra. For quivers containing cycles, the identification is supported by consistency with known results on special examples.

Significance. If the conjecture holds, it would furnish an explicit algebraic presentation of the quantum Coulomb branch in terms of shifted quiver Yangians, linking physical monopole operators to a well-studied class of algebras and enabling systematic study of their representations and BPS spectra. The explicit checks for tree-type quivers via the monopole-vortex construction provide a concrete, non-circular grounding that strengthens the claim beyond abstract consistency; this physical derivation for the tree case is a clear positive feature of the work.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The conjecture is stated for arbitrary 3D N=4 unitary quiver gauge theories, but the explicit monopole-vortex computation establishing simple poles in all charge functions and generation of the full algebra is carried out only for general tree-type quivers. For quivers with cycles the support is limited to consistency with prior results on special examples. This gap is load-bearing for the general claim, as the presence of loops could introduce higher-order poles or additional relations not captured by the truncated shifted Yangian.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract (final paragraph): The assertion that 'all the charge functions have only simple poles' is verified explicitly only for tree-type quivers. A direct check or argument ruling out higher-order poles for quivers containing cycles is needed to support the identification in the general case; without it, the truncation in Y(ˆQ, ˆW) may require adjustment.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and for identifying the distinction between the general conjecture and the scope of explicit verification. We agree that the abstract should be revised for greater precision on this point and will do so. Point-by-point responses to the major comments are provided below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The conjecture is stated for arbitrary 3D N=4 unitary quiver gauge theories, but the explicit monopole-vortex computation establishing simple poles in all charge functions and generation of the full algebra is carried out only for general tree-type quivers. For quivers with cycles the support is limited to consistency with prior results on special examples. This gap is load-bearing for the general claim, as the presence of loops could introduce higher-order poles or additional relations not captured by the truncated shifted Yangian.

    Authors: We agree that the explicit monopole-vortex computation, which establishes that all charge functions have only simple poles and that the monopoles generate the full algebra, is performed only for tree-type quivers. For quivers containing cycles the identification rests on consistency with known results for special examples, as already stated in the manuscript. We will revise the abstract to state the conjecture for general unitary quivers while explicitly noting that the direct verification via vortex representations applies to tree-type quivers and that support for cyclic cases comes from consistency checks. This clarifies the presentation without altering the underlying conjecture. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (final paragraph): The assertion that 'all the charge functions have only simple poles' is verified explicitly only for tree-type quivers. A direct check or argument ruling out higher-order poles for quivers containing cycles is needed to support the identification in the general case; without it, the truncation in Y(ˆQ, ˆW) may require adjustment.

    Authors: The assertion in the final paragraph of the abstract applies to the explicit checks performed for tree-type quivers. We do not currently possess a direct check or general argument that rules out higher-order poles for arbitrary quivers with cycles, since the vortex Hilbert-space construction used in the paper does not extend straightforwardly when cycles are present. In the special cyclic examples where we compare against known results, the charge functions nevertheless exhibit only simple poles, consistent with the proposed truncation. We will revise the abstract to make this scope explicit. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • A direct check or general argument ruling out higher-order poles for quivers containing cycles

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Conjecture supported by explicit monopole-vortex construction for tree quivers; no reduction to self-inputs

full rationale

The paper states a conjecture equating the quantum Coulomb branch algebra to the truncated shifted quiver Yangian Y(ˆQ, ˆW) and verifies it for tree-type quivers via the independent physical mechanism of monopole operators acting on 1/2-BPS vortex Hilbert spaces, producing representations with simple-pole charge functions. No equations or steps are shown to define the target algebra in terms of itself or to rename fitted parameters as predictions. The appeal to consistency with known results on special examples for non-tree quivers does not constitute a load-bearing self-citation chain or self-definitional loop within the provided derivation, as no specific prior self-work is quoted as the sole justification. The chain remains self-contained against external physical benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new free parameters or invented entities. It relies on standard domain assumptions from 3D N=4 gauge theory and quiver algebra literature.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The quantum Coulomb branch algebra is generated by 1/2-BPS monopoles together with the complex scalar in the vector multiplet under Omega-background deformation.
    Stated directly in the abstract as the starting point for the deformation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5709 in / 1413 out tokens · 47296 ms · 2026-05-23T03:36:59.839559+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages · 38 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Gauge Dynamics And Compactification To Three Dimensions

    N. Seiberg and E. Witten, “Gauge dynamics and compactification to three-dimensions,” arXiv:hep-th/9607163. 1, 9, 17, 81

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  2. [2]

    Mirror Symmetry in Three Dimensional Gauge Theories

    K. A. Intriligator and N. Seiberg, “Mirror symmetry in three-dimensional gauge theories,” Phys. Lett. B 387 (1996) 513–519, arXiv:hep-th/9607207. 1, 9, 17

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  3. [3]

    Type IIB Superstrings, BPS Monopoles, And Three-Dimensional Gauge Dynamics

    A. Hanany and E. Witten, “Type IIB superstrings, BPS monopoles, and three-dimensional gauge dynamics,” Nucl. Phys. B 492 (1997) 152–190, arXiv:hep-th/9611230

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  4. [4]

    Aspects of N=2 Supersymmetric Gauge Theories in Three Dimensions

    O. Aharony, A. Hanany, K. A. Intriligator, N. Seiberg, and M. J. Strassler, “Aspects of N=2 supersymmetric gauge theories in three-dimensions,” Nucl. Phys. B 499 (1997) 67–99, arXiv:hep-th/9703110. 1, 84

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  5. [5]

    Quantizations of conical symplectic resolutions II: category O and symplectic duality,

    T. Braden, A. Licata, N. Proudfoot, and B. Webster, “Quantizations of conical symplectic resolutions II: category O and symplectic duality,” Asterisque 384 (2016) 75–179, arXiv:1407.0964 [math.RT] . 1

    work page arXiv 2016

  6. [6]

    Boundaries, Mirror Symmetry, and Symplectic Duality in 3d $\mathcal{N}=4$ Gauge Theory

    M. Bullimore, T. Dimofte, D. Gaiotto, and J. Hilburn, “Boundaries, Mirror Symmetry, and Symplectic Duality in 3d N = 4 Gauge Theory,” JHEP 10 (2016) 108, arXiv:1603.08382 [hep-th] . 82

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  7. [7]

    Symplectic resolutions, symplectic duality, and Coulomb branches,

    J. Kamnitzer, “Symplectic resolutions, symplectic duality, and Coulomb branches,” Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society 54 no. 5, 1515–1551, arXiv:2202.03913 [math.RT] . 1

    work page arXiv

  8. [8]

    The Coulomb Branch of 3d $\mathcal{N}=4$ Theories

    M. Bullimore, T. Dimofte, and D. Gaiotto, “The Coulomb Branch of 3d N = 4 Theories,” Commun. Math. Phys. 354 no. 2, (2017) 671–751, arXiv:1503.04817 [hep-th]. 2, 4, 9, 12, 16, 17

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  9. [9]

    Monopole operators and Hilbert series of Coulomb branches of 3d N = 4 gauge theories

    S. Cremonesi, A. Hanany, and A. Zaffaroni, “Monopole operators and Hilbert series – 98 – of Coulomb branches of 3 d N = 4 gauge theories,” JHEP 01 (2014) 005, arXiv:1309.2657 [hep-th] . 2, 13

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  10. [10]

    Towards a mathematical definition of Coulomb branches of $3$-dimensional $\mathcal N=4$ gauge theories, I

    H. Nakajima, “Towards a mathematical definition of Coulomb branches of 3-dimensional N = 4 gauge theories, I,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 20 (2016) 595–669, arXiv:1503.03676 [math-ph] . 2, 9, 17, 18, 19, 72

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  11. [11]

    Towards a mathematical definition of Coulomb branches of 3-dimensional N = 4 gauge theories, II,

    A. Braverman, M. Finkelberg, and H. Nakajima, “Towards a mathematical definition of Coulomb branches of 3-dimensional N = 4 gauge theories, II,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 22 (2018) 1071–1147, arXiv:1601.03586 [math.RT] . 2, 3, 4, 9, 12, 18

    work page arXiv 2018

  12. [12]

    Coulomb branches of $3d$ $\mathcal N=4$ quiver gauge theories and slices in the affine Grassmannian (with appendices by Alexander Braverman, Michael Finkelberg, Joel Kamnitzer, Ryosuke Kodera, Hiraku Nakajima, Ben Webster, and Alex Weekes)

    A. Braverman, M. Finkelberg, and H. Nakajima, “Coulomb branches of 3 d N = 4 quiver gauge theories and slices in the affine Grassmannian,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 23 (2019) 75–166, arXiv:1604.03625 [math.RT] . 2, 3, 17, 18, 19, 70

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  13. [13]

    Ring objects in the equivariant derived Satake category arising from Coulomb branches (with an appendix by Gus Lonergan),

    A. Braverman, M. Finkelberg, and H. Nakajima, “Ring objects in the equivariant derived Satake category arising from Coulomb branches (with an appendix by Gus Lonergan),” Physics 23 (2019) 253–344, arXiv:1706.02112 [math.RT] . 2

    work page arXiv 2019

  14. [14]

    Vortices and Vermas

    M. Bullimore, T. Dimofte, D. Gaiotto, J. Hilburn, and H.-C. Kim, “Vortices and Vermas,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 22 (2018) 803–917, arXiv:1609.04406 [hep-th]. 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 11, 13, 15, 16, 18, 19, 28, 31, 33, 34, 40, 41, 78, 83, 86

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  15. [15]

    Coulomb branches of quiver gauge theories with symmetrizers

    H. Nakajima and A. Weekes, “Coulomb branches of quiver gauge theories with symmetrizers,” J. Eur. Math. Soc. 25 no. 1, (2021) 203–230, arXiv:1907.06552 [math.QA]. 3, 18, 70, 78

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  16. [16]

    Quantized Coulomb branches of Jordan quiver gauge theories and cyclotomic rational Cherednik algebras

    R. Kodera and H. Nakajima, “Quantized Coulomb branches of Jordan quiver gauge theories and cyclotomic rational Cherednik algebras,” Proc. Symp. Pure Math. 98 (2018) 49–78, arXiv:1608.00875 [math.RT] . 3, 18, 70, 78

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  17. [17]

    On category O for affine Grassmannian slices and categorified tensor products,

    J. Kamnitzer, P. Tingley, B. Webster, A. Weekes, and O. Yacobi, “On category O for affine Grassmannian slices and categorified tensor products,” Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 119 no. 5, (2024) 1179–1233, arXiv:1806.07519 [math.RT] . 3

    work page arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    Generators for Coulomb branches of quiver gauge theories

    A. Weekes, “Generators for Coulomb branches of quiver gauge theories,” arXiv:1903.07734 [math.RT] . 3

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1903

  19. [19]

    Quiver Yangian from Crystal Melting,

    W. Li and M. Yamazaki, “Quiver Yangian from Crystal Melting,” JHEP 11 (2020) 035, arXiv:2003.08909 [hep-th] . 3, 4, 44, 45, 47, 78, 79

    work page arXiv 2020

  20. [20]

    Quiver Yangians and crystal meltings: A concise summary,

    M. Yamazaki, “Quiver Yangians and crystal meltings: A concise summary,” J. Math. Phys. 64 no. 1, (2023) 011101, arXiv:2203.14314 [hep-th] . 3

    work page arXiv 2023

  21. [21]

    Quiver algebras and their representations for arbitrary quivers,

    W. Li, “Quiver algebras and their representations for arbitrary quivers,” JHEP 12 (2024) 089, arXiv:2303.05521 [hep-th] . 3, 4, 5, 40, 43, 44, 45, 47, 48, 49, 54, 62, 70, 80

    work page arXiv 2024

  22. [22]

    Shifted quiver Yangians and representations from BPS crystals,

    D. Galakhov, W. Li, and M. Yamazaki, “Shifted quiver Yangians and representations from BPS crystals,” JHEP 08 (2021) 146, arXiv:2106.01230 [hep-th] . 3, 48, 79

    work page arXiv 2021

  23. [23]

    Quiver Yangian and Supersymmetric Quantum – 99 – Mechanics,

    D. Galakhov and M. Yamazaki, “Quiver Yangian and Supersymmetric Quantum – 99 – Mechanics,” Commun. Math. Phys. 396 no. 2, (2022) 713–785, arXiv:2008.07006 [hep-th]. 3, 79

    work page arXiv 2022

  24. [24]

    Toroidal and elliptic quiver BPS algebras and beyond,

    D. Galakhov, W. Li, and M. Yamazaki, “Toroidal and elliptic quiver BPS algebras and beyond,” JHEP 02 (2022) 024, arXiv:2108.10286 [hep-th] . 73, 74, 79

    work page arXiv 2022

  25. [25]

    A note on quiver Yangians and R-matrices,

    J. Bao, “A note on quiver Yangians and R-matrices,” JHEP 08 (2022) 219, arXiv:2206.06186 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  26. [26]

    Quiver Yangians and W -algebras for generalized conifolds,

    J. Bao, “Quiver Yangians and W -algebras for generalized conifolds,” J. Phys. A 56 no. 22, (2023) 225203, arXiv:2208.13395 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  27. [27]

    More on affine Dynkin quiver Yangians,

    J. Bao, “More on affine Dynkin quiver Yangians,” JHEP 07 (2023) 153, arXiv:2304.00767 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  28. [28]

    Toward a theory of Yangians,

    D. Galakhov, A. Morozov, and N. Tselousov, “Toward a theory of Yangians,” Phys. Rev. D 109 no. 6, (2024) 066001, arXiv:2311.00760 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  29. [29]

    Algorithms for representations of quiver Yangian algebras,

    D. Galakhov, A. Gavshin, A. Morozov, and N. Tselousov, “Algorithms for representations of quiver Yangian algebras,” JHEP 08 (2024) 209, arXiv:2406.20074 [hep-th] . 3

    work page arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    Crystal Melting and Toric Calabi-Yau Manifolds

    H. Ooguri and M. Yamazaki, “Crystal Melting and Toric Calabi-Yau Manifolds,” Commun. Math. Phys. 292 (2009) 179–199, arXiv:0811.2801 [hep-th] . 3, 79

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  31. [31]

    Calabi-Yau algebras

    V. Ginzburg, “Calabi-Yau algebras,” arXiv:math/0612139. 4, 71

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  32. [32]

    Geometrical Structure and Ultraviolet Finiteness in the Supersymmetric Sigma Model,

    L. Alvarez-Gaume and D. Z. Freedman, “Geometrical Structure and Ultraviolet Finiteness in the Supersymmetric Sigma Model,” Commun. Math. Phys. 80 (1981)

    work page 1981

  33. [33]

    Crew, Geometric aspects of three dimensional N = 4 gauge theories

    S. Crew, Geometric aspects of three dimensional N = 4 gauge theories. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge U., 2022. 9

    work page 2022

  34. [34]

    Monopoles, Duality and Chiral Symmetry Breaking in N=2 Supersymmetric QCD

    N. Seiberg and E. Witten, “Monopoles, duality and chiral symmetry breaking in N=2 supersymmetric QCD,” Nucl. Phys. B 431 (1994) 484–550, arXiv:hep-th/9408099. 9

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  35. [35]

    The Moduli Space of N=2 SUSY QCD and Duality in N=1 SUSY QCD

    P. C. Argyres, M. R. Plesser, and N. Seiberg, “The Moduli space of vacua of N=2 SUSY QCD and duality in N=1 SUSY QCD,” Nucl. Phys. B 471 (1996) 159–194, arXiv:hep-th/9603042. 9

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  36. [36]

    Three-dimensional N = 4 gauge theories in omega background,

    M. Bullimore, “Three-dimensional N = 4 gauge theories in omega background,” Proc. Symp. Pure Math. 98 (2018) 1–20. 9, 15

    work page 2018

  37. [37]

    Instantons on ALE spaces, quiver varieties, and Kac-Moody algebras,

    H. Nakajima, “Instantons on ALE spaces, quiver varieties, and Kac-Moody algebras,” Duke Math. J. 76 no. 2, (1994) 365–416. 9

    work page 1994

  38. [38]

    Seiberg-Witten Prepotential From Instanton Counting

    N. A. Nekrasov, “Seiberg-Witten prepotential from instanton counting,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 7 no. 5, (2003) 831–864, arXiv:hep-th/0206161. 13

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  39. [39]

    The Omega Deformation, Branes, Integrability, and Liouville Theory

    N. Nekrasov and E. Witten, “The Omega Deformation, Branes, Integrability, and Liouville Theory,” JHEP 09 (2010) 092, arXiv:1002.0888 [hep-th] . 13 – 100 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  40. [40]

    Supersymmetry and Morse theory,

    E. Witten, “Supersymmetry and Morse theory,” J. Diff. Geom. 17 no. 4, (1982) 661–692. 16

    work page 1982

  41. [41]

    IR Dynamics on Branes and Space-Time Geometry

    N. Seiberg, “IR dynamics on branes and space-time geometry,” Phys. Lett. B 384 (1996) 81–85, arXiv:hep-th/9606017. 17

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  42. [42]

    Instanton counting via affine Lie algebras I: Equivariant J-functions of (affine) flag manifolds and Whittaker vectors

    A. Braverman, “Instanton counting via affine Lie algebras. 1. Equivariant J functions of (affine) flag manifolds and Whittaker vectors,” arXiv:math/0401409 [math.AG] . 18

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  43. [43]

    A finite analog of the AGT relation I: finite W-algebras and quasimaps' spaces

    A. Braverman, B. Feigin, M. Finkelberg, and L. Rybnikov, “A Finite analog of the AGT relation I: Finite W -algebras and quasimaps’ spaces,” Commun. Math. Phys. 308 (2011) 457–478, arXiv:1008.3655 [math.AG] . 18

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  44. [44]

    S-Duality of Boundary Conditions In N=4 Super Yang-Mills Theory

    D. Gaiotto and E. Witten, “S-Duality of Boundary Conditions In N=4 Super Yang-Mills Theory,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 13 no. 3, (2009) 721–896, arXiv:0807.3720 [hep-th] . 21, 22

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  45. [45]

    Quotient quiver subtraction,

    A. Hanany, R. Kalveks, and G. Kumaran, “Quotient quiver subtraction,” Nucl. Phys. B 1009 (2024) 116731, arXiv:2308.05853 [hep-th] . 22

    work page arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    Moduli Space of Non-Abelian Vortices

    M. Eto, Y. Isozumi, M. Nitta, K. Ohashi, and N. Sakai, “Moduli space of non-Abelian vortices,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 161601, arXiv:hep-th/0511088. 28

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  47. [47]

    Solitons in the Higgs phase -- the moduli matrix approach --

    M. Eto, Y. Isozumi, M. Nitta, K. Ohashi, and N. Sakai, “Solitons in the Higgs phase: The Moduli matrix approach,” J. Phys. A 39 (2006) R315–R392, arXiv:hep-th/0602170. 28

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  48. [48]

    Handsaw quiver varieties and finite W-algebras

    H. Nakajima, “Handsaw quiver varieties and finite W-algebras,” Moscow Math. J. 12 (2012) 633, arXiv:1107.5073 [math.QA] . 41

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  49. [49]

    Vortices, Instantons and Branes

    A. Hanany and D. Tong, “Vortices, instantons and branes,” JHEP 07 (2003) 037, arXiv:hep-th/0306150. 41

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  50. [50]

    Mirror Symmetry And Loop Operators

    B. Assel and J. Gomis, “Mirror Symmetry And Loop Operators,” JHEP 11 (2015) 055, arXiv:1506.01718 [hep-th] . 41

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  51. [51]

    The cohomological Hall algebra of a preprojective algebra

    Y. Yang and G. Zhao, “The cohomological hall algebra of a preprojective algebra: Preprojective cohomological hall algebra,” Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 116 no. 5, (Jan., 2018) 1029–1074, arXiv:1407.7994 [math.RT] . 71, 75, 76

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  52. [52]

    On two cohomological hall algebras,

    Y. Yang and G. Zhao, “On two cohomological hall algebras,” arXiv:1604.01477 [math.RT]. 71, 74

    work page arXiv

  53. [53]

    Cohomological Hall algebras and affine quantum groups

    Y. Yang and G. Zhao, “Cohomological Hall algebras and affine quantum groups,” arXiv:1604.01865 [math.RT] . 71, 73, 75

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  54. [54]

    Cohomological Hall algebra, exponential Hodge structures and motivic Donaldson-Thomas invariants

    M. Kontsevich and Y. Soibelman, “Cohomological Hall algebra, exponential Hodge structures and motivic Donaldson-Thomas invariants,” Commun. Num. Theor. Phys. 5 (2011) 231–352, arXiv:1006.2706 [math.AG] . 71, 72, 73, 79

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  55. [55]

    Cohomological Hall algebras and – 101 – perverse coherent sheaves on toric Calabi–Yau 3-folds,

    M. Rapcak, Y. Soibelman, Y. Yang, and G. Zhao, “Cohomological Hall algebras and – 101 – perverse coherent sheaves on toric Calabi–Yau 3-folds,” Commun. Num. Theor. Phys. 17 no. 4, (2023) 847–939, arXiv:2007.13365 [math.QA] . 72, 74, 78

    work page arXiv 2023

  56. [56]

    Vector bundles on elliptic curve and Sklyanin algebras

    B. L. Feigin and A. V. Odesskii, “Vector bundles on elliptic curve and sklyanin algebras,” arXiv:q-alg/9509021 [q-alg]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  57. [57]

    On correlation functions of Drinfeld currents and shuffle algebras

    B. Enriquez, “On correlation functions of Drinfeld currents and shuffle algebras,” arXiv:math/9809036 [math.QA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  58. [58]

    Cohomological Hall algebras, vertex algebras and instantons,

    M. Rapcak, Y. Soibelman, Y. Yang, and G. Zhao, “Cohomological Hall algebras, vertex algebras and instantons,” Commun. Math. Phys. 376 no. 3, (2019) 1803–1873, arXiv:1810.10402 [math.QA] . 79

    work page arXiv 2019

  59. [59]

    Quantum toroidal and shuffle algebras,

    A. Negut, “Quantum toroidal and shuffle algebras,” Adv. Math. 372 (2020) 107288, arXiv:1302.6202 [math.RT] . 74

    work page arXiv 2020

  60. [60]

    Generators of the preprojective CoHA of a quiver,

    A. Negut ¸, “Generators of the preprojective CoHA of a quiver,” arXiv:2311.07566 [math.RT]. 74

    work page arXiv

  61. [61]

    Shuffle algebras for quivers and wheel conditions,

    A. Negut ¸, “Shuffle algebras for quivers and wheel conditions,” arXiv:2108.08779 [math.RT]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.08779. 74

    work page arXiv

  62. [62]

    The affine Yangian of $\mathfrak{gl}_1$ revisited

    A. Tsymbaliuk, “The affine Yangian of gl1 revisited,” Adv. Math. 304 (2017) 583–645, arXiv:1404.5240 [math.RT] . 78

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  63. [63]

    W-symmetry, topological vertex and affine Yangian

    T. Proch´ azka, “W -symmetry, topological vertex and affine Yangian,” JHEP 10 (2016) 077, arXiv:1512.07178 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  64. [64]

    Higher Spins and Yangian Symmetries

    M. R. Gaberdiel, R. Gopakumar, W. Li, and C. Peng, “Higher Spins and Yangian Symmetries,” JHEP 04 (2017) 152, arXiv:1702.05100 [hep-th] . 78

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  65. [65]

    On the algebras of BPS states

    J. A. Harvey and G. W. Moore, “On the algebras of BPS states,” Commun. Math. Phys. 197 (1998) 489–519, arXiv:hep-th/9609017. 79

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  66. [66]

    Stability structures, motivic Donaldson-Thomas invariants and cluster transformations

    M. Kontsevich and Y. Soibelman, “Stability structures, motivic Donaldson-Thomas invariants and cluster transformations,” arXiv:0811.2435 [math.AG] . 79

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  67. [67]

    Categories of Line Defects and Cohomological Hall Algebras,

    D. Gaiotto, N. Grygoryev, and W. Li, “Categories of Line Defects and Cohomological Hall Algebras,” arXiv:2406.07134 [hep-th] . 79

    work page arXiv

  68. [68]

    Supersymmetry and the Division Algebras,

    T. Kugo and P. K. Townsend, “Supersymmetry and the Division Algebras,” Nucl. Phys. B 221 (1983) 357–380. 81

    work page 1983

  69. [69]

    Three-dimensional N = 2 supersymmetric gauge theories and partition functions on Seifert manifolds: A review,

    C. Closset and H. Kim, “Three-dimensional N = 2 supersymmetric gauge theories and partition functions on Seifert manifolds: A review,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 34 no. 23, (2019) 1930011, arXiv:1908.08875 [hep-th] . 84 – 102 –

    work page arXiv 2019