Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Moduli Space of Non-Abelian Vortices

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 8 Nov 2005

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We completely determine the moduli space M_{N,k} of k-vortices in U(N) gauge theory with N Higgs fields in the fundamental representation.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-th/0511088 (version 3)
Pith IDVTPKDTW6, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationKeisuke Ohashi, Minoru Eto, Muneto Nitta, Norisuke Sakai, Youichi Isozumi. "Moduli Space of Non-Abelian Vortices." arXiv:hep-th/0511088 (2005). https://pith.science/paper/VTPKDTW6
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,517 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.09 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.01 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.11 · compares with prior results 0.32 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v3. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We completely determine the moduli space M_{N,k} of k-vortices in U(N) gauge theory with N Higgs fields in the fundamental representation. Its open subset for separated vortices is found as the symmetric product (C x CP^{N-1})^k / S_k. Orbifold singularities of this space correspond to coincident vortices and are resolved resulting in a smooth moduli manifold. Relation to Kahler quotient construction is discussed.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We completely determine the moduli space M_{N,k} of k-vortices in U(N) gauge theory with N Higgs fields in the fundamental representation. contribution 0.60 0.94 0.85 asserted 1.00
s1 Its open subset for separated vortices is found as the symmetric product (C x CP^{N-1})^k / S_k. result 0.99 0.91 0.18 asserted 1.00
s2 Orbifold singularities of this space correspond to coincident vortices and are resolved resulting in a smooth moduli manifold. result 0.78 0.81 0.15 asserted 1.00
s3 Relation to Kahler quotient construction is discussed. contribution 0.56 0.61 0.03 asserted 0.63

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v3
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We completely determine the moduli space M_{N,k} of k-vortices in U(N) gauge theory with N Higgs fields in the fundamental representation. Its open subset for separated vortices is found as the symmetric product (C x CP^{N-1})^k / S_k. Orbifold singularities of this space correspond to coincident vortices and are resolved resulting in a smooth moduli manifold. Relation to Kahler quotient construction is discussed.

Human review
References
How later papers used it

77 later papers cite it

Evidence: some. 26 of the citing papers share no author with it, and 4 of those carry a confident label from Pith's citation classifier.

Pith read 9 of the 143 citing sentences, choosing only those whose citation markers point at this paper alone, and wrote the paraphrases from them. The summary, the counts, the evidence level, the links and the quotes come from code; the summary counts the papers listed below. A later paper is listed under a label when Pith's citation classifier gives one of its sentences that label at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), Pith's reading finds that the citing paper itself did it, and a second check confirms the paraphrase against the sentence. This section lists uses only. It does not list criticism or disagreement, so their absence here says nothing about how the paper has been received. Papers that share an author with this one are listed apart, under "By the same authors". A quote is the citing authors' own sentence, shown when their paper's licence is CC BY, CC BY-SA or CC0. JSON

Builds on it 1 of 2 papers with this label · 1 by the same authors

By the same authors

Uses its method or tool 1 of 12 papers with this label · 1 by the same authors

By the same authors

How the literature uses it

67 arXiv papers cite this in 127 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 81 sentences without a confident label

Builds on it 2 papers
  • [ref] ) to include the extra adjoint field that is possessed by YMCSH theory and the result is consistent with the result of the index theorem calculation, that the moduli are all contained in the moduli matrix, that comes from the self-dual BPS equation.

    The moduli space of non-Abelian vortices in Yang-Mills-Chern-Simons-Higgs theory · Conclusion and discussion · 0.87

  • We have generalized the moduli matrix formalism [ref] to clarify all possible moduli parameters of the minimally quantized fractional vortices.

    Fractional Vortices and Lumps · Conclusion · 0.80

Uses its method or tool 11 papers
  • Let us apply the moduli matrix for the vortex system [ref] in order to solve the first of the BPS equations ([ref]) and ([ref]) (which is the same in both the YM and CS theories): H = S^-1H_0(z) , A̅ = -iS^-1S , S ∈G^ℂ ,

    Zero-modes of Non-Abelian Solitons in Three Dimensional Gauge Theories · The moduli matrix method · 0.98

  • In this paper we apply the moduli matrix approach to study the vortex moduli space [ref] .

    Vortex counting from field theory · Introduction · 1.00

  • The matter part of the above vortex equation can be solved by the moduli matrix $H_0(z)$ which is a color-flavor mixed matrix whose elements are holomorphic (polynomials) in $z$, for the left-handed vortex solution Eq. ([ref]) [ref] H = S^-1 H_0 (z) , W̅ = - i S^-1S , where $S$ is an element of the complex extension of the gauge group S(z,z̅)= e^ i ∑_I Λ^I(z,z̅) T^I ∈G^ℂ , Λ^I(z,z̅) ∈ℂ .

    Fractional Vortices and Lumps · General arguments · 0.93

Compares with it 2 papers
  • In this respect, the present model (i.e. the model of [ref] ), where the $SU(N)×U(1)$ theory arises as a low-energy approximation of a spontaneously broken $SU(N+1)$ theory, differs essentially from the genuine $U(N)$ model studied by other groups [ref] , [ref] - [ref] , where all scalar and gauge field components live in $N×N$ color space.

    Non-Abelian monopole-vortex complex · Remarks · 0.97

  • This moduli matrix formalism is very similar to the case of the $U(N)$ gauge theory with $N$ flavours of Higgs fields in the fundamental representation [ref] , except that here we have two gauge groups $SU(N), SU(N)$ besides a $U(1)$ gauge group.

    Maximally Non-Abelian Vortices from Self-dual Yang--Mills Fields · Introduction · 0.96

Cites it as background 22 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.