Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 3 cited by

Black Hole Entropy, Quantum Corrections and EFT Transitions

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that the infinite tower of quantum corrections to D0-D2-D4 BPS black hole entropy can be resummed into a finite, monotonic function that reduces, in the five-dimensional limit, to the exact microscopic entropy of the…

desk verdict Solid resummation with a real 5d microstate check; main caveats are the unsettled entropy-versus-index status and a sign-of-chi_E condition in the D0-D2-D4 attractor that the paper does not flag. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.02655 v2 pith:D4IE3522 submitted 2025-02-04 hep-th gr-qc

Alberto Castellano , Matteo Zatti This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thgr-qc PACS 04.70.Dy04.65.+e
keywords blackholeentropyBPSholesN=2supergravityhigher-derivativecorrectionsasymptoticseriesresummationEFTtransitionsacrossdimensionsD0-branetowerCalabi-Yaucompactification
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies the infinite series of higher-derivative quantum corrections to the entropy of BPS (supersymmetric) black holes in four-dimensional $\mathcal{N}=2$ effective field theories coming from string theory on a Calabi-Yau threefold, a compact six-dimensional manifold. It claims that for a black hole carrying D0-, D2-, and D4-brane charges, the naively divergent asymptotic series of corrections can be resummed exactly into a finite, monotonic function of the parameter $\alpha$, which measures the ratio of the compactification-circle radius to the black hole horizon radius. The calculation isolates the one-loop contribution of the infinite tower of D0-brane states to the generalized prepotential, the function packaging all higher-derivative terms, and evaluates the associated proper-time integral exactly. The resulting entropy formula (3.33) is well defined for every $\alpha>0$, and as $\alpha\to\infty$ it reduces to $2\pi\sqrt{|\hat q_0| c_L/6}$, exactly the microscopic entropy of the five-dimensional black string. The paper takes this as evidence that stable BPS black holes can interpolate smoothly between four- and five-dimensional effective descriptions, including the regime where the horizon is comparable to the compactification scale, and that non-perturbative corrections do not change the conclusion.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the resummed one-loop D0-brane contribution $G(Y^0,\Upsilon)$ to the generalized prepotential, together with the parameter $\alpha$ defined by $\alpha^2=-\Upsilon/(64(Y^0)^2)$. At the attractor point, $|\alpha|$ equals the ratio $r_5/r_h$ of the compactification-circle radius to the black hole horizon radius. The explicitly resummable expression $G^{(p)}$ replaces the factorial-growth asymptotic series with a convergent sum of logarithms, and its monotonic derivative controls the attractor solution for all $\alpha>0$. Feeding $G^{(p)}$ into the quantum entropy formula $S_{BH}=\pi(|Z|^2+4\operatorname{Im}(\Upsilon\partial_\Upsilon F))$ gives the entropy formula (3.33), whose $\alpha\to\infty$ limit retains only the one-loop piece that matches the five-dimensional black string.

What would settle it

Solve the attractor equation (3.11) numerically with the resummed $G^{(p)}$ inserted and scan the resulting entropy (3.33) over all positive $\alpha$; a singularity, branch point, or non-monotonic region would falsify the claimed interpolation. A sharper test is to compute the subleading $1/|\hat q_0|$ corrections to (3.33) and verify that the corrected series remains convergent and monotonic at $\alpha=O(1)$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the quantum-corrected BPS black hole entropy, computed from the generalized prepotential $F(Y,\Upsilon)$ with the universal higher-genus contributions included, has a well-defined resummation across the whole regime $0<\alpha<\infty$ for the D0-D2-D4 system. Writing the one-loop D0-brane contribution as $G(Y^0,\Upsilon)=\frac{i}{2(2\pi)^3}\chi_E(X_3)(Y^0)^2 I(\alpha)$, the paper evaluates the perturbative part of the proper-time integral as $G^{(p)}=-\frac{i}{2(2\pi)^3}\chi_E(X_3)(Y^0)^2\alpha^2\sum_{n\ge1} n\log(1-e^{-\alpha n})$, a non-analytic function that vanishes as $\alpha\to\infty$. Substituting this into the attractor equations yields the finite, monotonic entropy (3.33). In the decompactification limit the formula tends to $2\pi\sqrt{|\hat q_0|c_L/6}$ with $c_L=K_{abc}p^ap^bp^c+c_{2,a}p^a$, matching the microscopic entropy of the five-dimensional black string; the paper interprets this as an explicit gluing of two complementary effective field theories. For the complementary D2-D6 system, $\alpha$ is purely imaginary, the transition regime can be reached, but a full five-dimensional decompactification is forbidden by the presence of monopole charge associated with the compact direction, and non-perturbative effects are absent.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the quantum entropy formula (2.21) computes the physical BPS entropy (or a protected index that agrees with it in the large-charge limit), and that the simplified formulas derived under the perturbative charge hierarchy (3.18) can be extrapolated into the transition region where that hierarchy no longer holds.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For D0-D2-D4 systems, the entropy computed from the four-dimensional effective field theory remains finite and monotonic across $\alpha=O(1)$, so the black hole need not undergo a phase transition as it passes from the four- to the five-dimensional regime.
  • The limit $\alpha\to\infty$ of the resummed formula reproduces the microscopic entropy $2\pi\sqrt{|\hat q_0|c_L/6}$, so a purely four-dimensional macroscopic computation can reproduce the exact five-dimensional black string microstate count.
  • The D2-D6 system reaches the transition region but cannot be decompactified to five dimensions, because its five-dimensional uplift carries monopole charge from the compact direction; this selects a different class of effective field theory transitions.
  • Non-perturbative corrections, where present, enter only through the imaginary part of $I(\alpha)$ and therefore leave the attractor equations and the real entropy unchanged.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same contour-resummation strategy should carry over to other infinite-distance limits in the vector multiplet moduli space, for example worldsheet-instanton corrections, where the expansion parameter will generally be complex; the paper's analysis of the residue prescription near $\operatorname{Re}\alpha=0$ indicates that the choice of integration contour is the central subtlety there.
  • If the quantum entropy formula (2.21) ultimately computes a protected index rather than the statistical entropy, then the claim that black holes probe scales beyond the quantum gravity cutoff should be read as a statement about that index; the exact five-dimensional matching suggests the distinction is invisible at the orders considered, but it could appear in subleading corrections or in the D2-D
  • Treating $\alpha=r_5/r_h$ as a diagnostic, one can test whether other black-hole/tower systems exhibit the same smooth interpolation or instead require a genuine phase transition at $|\alpha|=O(1)$; the present paper indicates that stable BPS configurations do not need one.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies quantum corrections to the entropy of BPS black holes in four-dimensional N=2 supergravity arising from Type IIA string theory on a Calabi-Yau threefold. The authors focus on the tower of higher-derivative F-terms encoded in the generalized prepotential and, in the large-volume regime, isolate the universal D0-brane contribution. They show that the resulting series is asymptotic, with expansion parameter alpha equal to the ratio of the M-theory circle radius to the horizon radius, and they resum it into the convergent expression (3.29). For the D0-D2-D4 system they obtain the entropy formula (3.33), which interpolates between the 4d EFT regime and the 5d regime, and they verify that in the decompactification limit it reproduces the exact microstate counting of the five-dimensional black string, eqs. (3.34)-(3.36). They analyze similarly the D2-D6 system, where alpha is purely imaginary and a genuine 5d limit is obstructed by the Taub-NUT charge, and they argue that non-perturbative Schwinger contributions do not alter the attractor equations or the entropy. The main conceptual claim is that stable BPS black holes can probe scales beyond the quantum-gravity cutoff, with the 4d-to-5d transition resolved by non-local quantum effects.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper provides an explicit, non-perturbatively controlled example of an EFT transition in black hole physics: an asymptotic higher-derivative series is resummed into a finite expression, and the result matches independent microscopic and 5d supergravity computations. The technical work is substantial and largely coherent. In particular, the derivation of the resummed prepotential from the Schwinger integral, the careful separation of perturbative and non-perturbative contributions in Sections 3.3-3.4, and the exact agreement with the 5d black-string central charge c_L = K_abc p^a p^b p^c + c_{2,a} p^a are strong points. No new free parameters are introduced, and the central formulas are not fitted to the microstate counting. The main limitations are conceptual: the paper explicitly leaves open whether eq. (2.21) computes an entropy or a protected index, and the extrapolation from the perturbative hierarchy to all alpha requires a hierarchy condition that is not stated explicitly. These issues affect the interpretation but not the algebraic core of the paper.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 2.2] After Eq. (2.21), the paper explicitly states that it will not settle whether (2.21) computes the BPS entropy or a protected supersymmetric index. This is load-bearing rather than purely semantic, because the title, abstract, and the central claim that stable black holes probe scales beyond the quantum-gravity cutoff are phrased in terms of entropy. The argument in Section 2.2 that entropy and index agree at leading order in the large-charge expansion does not automatically cover the transition regime alpha = O(1), where the most interesting 4d-to-5d extrapolation is made. Please either provide a reference or an argument that index and entropy coincide for the charge ranges used at alpha = O(1), or systematically rephrase the claims in terms of an indexed entropy and adjust the physical conclusions accordingly.
  2. [Sections 3.2.1 and 3.3.1] The iterative solution (3.13) is justified by the hierarchy (3.18), but the paper does not state the extra condition needed when chi_E > 0. Combining the resummed result (3.32) with the attractor equation (3.11) gives qhat_0 = - c_L alpha^2/24 + chi_E/(2 pi)^3 alpha^2 S(alpha), with S(alpha) = sum_n n^2 e^{-alpha n}/(1-e^{-alpha n}). For chi_E > 0 the right-hand side is positive and divergent as alpha -> 0, so for fixed negative qhat_0 the root cannot lie arbitrarily close to the classical large-Y0 point; the perturbative regime exists only when c_L alpha^3 >> chi_E, up to numerical factors. This condition is not implied by (3.18) alone and should be stated explicitly, since it underlies the validity of (3.13) and the positivity of the square root in (3.33). The stress-test concern that no solution exists at all is too strong: the right-hand side tends to -infinity as alpha -> infinity, so a solution exists for every negative qhat_0. The real issue is root selection and the hierarchy, not the sign of chi_E by itself.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.2.2] There are several typos that should be corrected: 'anti-sefl-dual' should be 'anti-self-dual', 'Scwhinger' should be 'Schwinger', 'trough' should be 'through', and in Figure 7 'vertical axys' should be 'vertical axis'.
  2. [Eq. (3.26)] The sum over n in Z in (3.26) contains the singular n=0 term, since 1/sinh^2(0) is divergent. The paper should specify the principal-value prescription or state explicitly that n=0 is excluded before the Poisson resummation that leads to (3.28).
  3. [Figures 2 and 7] The captions should define the sign convention for chi_E and state clearly what is plotted (real or imaginary part of G, and the precise error variable in Figure 7). Currently the reader must infer these conventions from the main text.
  4. [Section 3.3.1] Near Eq. (3.29), it would be helpful to note explicitly that (Y0)^2 alpha^2 = -Upsilon/64 is independent of Y0 when Upsilon is fixed; this identity is what makes the derivative computation leading to (3.32) transparent and avoids apparent tension between (3.29) and (3.30).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central resummation and 4d/5d comparison are self-contained and checked against independent microstate counting; self-citations are background only.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained and I find no circular step. The macroscopic entropy formula (2.21), the generalized prepotential (2.31), and the D0-brane Schwinger integral (3.26) are taken from non-author prior work ([36], [38], [50, 51]), and the paper's own contributions are the exact evaluation of that integral, the attractor-based fixing of Y0 via (3.11), and the resulting resummed entropy (3.33). No parameter is fitted to the 5d microstate result. The alpha-to-infinity limit of (3.33) is compared with, not imposed on, the independently derived microscopic entropy (3.34) and the 5d Wald/Cardy computation of [129], so the match constitutes an external check. Self-citations in the paper ([12], [14], [15], [108], [109], [113], [148]) concern background species-scale and EFT-transition discussion or future-work pointers, and none is load-bearing for the central derivation. The paper itself explicitly flags the entropy-versus-index ambiguity in Section 2.2 ('we will not be concerned about whether (2.21) is truly computing an entropy or a protected supersymmetric index'), and the perturbative charge hierarchy (3.18) is later extrapolated to alpha=O(1); these are interpretation and regime-of-validity limitations, not circular inputs. Similarly, the sign/consistency condition of the D0-D2-D4 attractor equation (3.11) with the resummed derivative (3.32) is an internal-consistency concern that would affect correctness, but it does not reduce the derivation to its own assumptions.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to data: α is fixed by the attractor equations, and the topological data D_abc, c_{2,a}, and χ_E are inputs of the compactification. No new particles, forces, dimensions, or conserved quantities are introduced; the D0-brane tower and KK modes are standard string theory states. The ledger is dominated by domain assumptions inherited from the established N=2 supergravity and Gopakumar-Vafa framework.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The higher-derivative F-terms (2.5) capture all relevant corrections to the BPS entropy or index.
    Section 2.1 relies on references [36,40,41]; non-chiral and hypermultiplet-dependent terms are set aside, with the caveat discussed in Section 2.2.
  • domain assumption The Schwinger integral (2.10) from the Gopakumar-Vafa M-theory duality gives the D0-brane contribution to the generalized prepotential.
    Equation (2.10), following [50,51], is the starting point for the resummations in Sections 3.3 and 4.3.
  • domain assumption The large-volume truncation (2.31) of the prepotential ignores worldsheet instantons and non-universal corrections.
    Section 2.3 defines the regime; the paper explicitly restricts to constant-map universal corrections (footnote 16).
  • domain assumption The quantum entropy formula (2.21) computes the BPS entropy or index at large charge.
    Section 2.2, following [41], states that matching holds only at leading order in the large electric charge expansion; the paper does not resolve the entropy-versus-index ambiguity.
  • standard math Standard tools of asymptotic analysis, Borel resummation, and residue calculus are valid for the relevant integrals.
    Appendix A uses optimal truncation, Borel transforms, and Dirichlet's approximation theorem; the contour prescriptions are standard, and Section 4.3.1 discusses where they fail.
  • standard math Causality-preserving contour rotation of the Schwinger integrals is legitimate for the complex phases of α considered.
    The i0+ prescriptions and contour deformations in Sections 3.4 and 4.3 follow standard causality arguments; the paper explicitly analyzes the case Re α = 0 separately.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Black Hole Entropy, Quantum Corrections and EFT Transitions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/D4IE3522

@misc{pith2026250202655,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Black Hole Entropy, Quantum Corrections and EFT Transitions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/D4IE3522}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.02655}
}
abstract

We revisit and study quantum corrections to the supersymmetric entropy of BPS black holes in 4d $\mathcal{N}=2$ effective field theories (EFTs), which can be obtained from Type IIA string theory compactified on a Calabi-Yau threefold. Macroscopically, these corrections arise from an infinite series of higher-derivative F-terms that encode certain modifications to the two-derivative supergravity effective action. Within the large volume regime, we analyze in detail the moduli dependence of these semi-classical contributions and explore their implications for the black hole entropy. As a byproduct, we show that the entropy captures, in a rather intricate way, the transition between four- and five-dimensional dual EFT descriptions. In fact, the expansion parameter $\alpha$ controlling the relevant asymptotic series can be related to the ratio of the black hole horizon and the Kaluza-Klein scale, given here by the inverse D0-brane mass. Furthermore, we are able to resum the series into a well-behaved convergent expression for all values of $\alpha$. This demonstrates, in turn, that (stable) black holes can, indeed, probe scales besides the quantum gravity cutoff. More precisely, by examining two representative BPS systems -- the D0-D2-D4 and D2-D6 black hole solutions -- we explicitly illustrate how highly non-local (perturbative) quantum effects resolve the divergences, ultimately leading to a well-defined entropy function. Additionally, in certain cases, we show that one can take a suitable decompactification limit to 5d and verify that the corrected entropy function reproduces the exact microstate counting of the underlying five-dimensional black string. Our results also clarify the role of non-perturbative quantum corrections, which, remarkably, do not modify any of our prior conclusions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Kaluza-Klein tower thresholds and scheme dependence of the species scale

    hep-th 2026-07 accept novelty 6.5 of 10

    Leading KK-tower local corrections to four-derivative gravity are regulator-dependent EFT matching data, while log N terms are universal within proper-time cutoffs, so species-scale definitions match only parametrically.

  2. IR Black Hole Instabilities Trigger Species-Scale Particle Production

    hep-th 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A mechanism is proposed in which black hole instability at the tower scale converts a fraction of the mass into particles at the species scale, with Hawking evaporation subdominant.

  3. Classical Black Hole Probes of UV Scales

    hep-th 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Minimal classical BPS black holes in string compactifications track the species or KK scale in infinite-distance limits, and violations may signal inconsistent EFTs.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

179 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    J. D. Bekenstein,Black holes and the second law,Lett. Nuovo Cim.4(1972) 737–740

    1972

  2. [2]

    S. W. Hawking,Particle Creation by Black Holes,Commun. Math. Phys.43(1975) 199–220. [Erratum: Commun.Math.Phys. 46, 206 (1976)]

    1975

  3. [3]

    van de Heisteeg, C

    D. van de Heisteeg, C. Vafa, M. Wiesner, and D. H. Wu,Moduli-dependent species scale, Beijing J. Pure Appl. Math.1(2024), no. 1 1–41, [arXiv:2212.06841]

    arXiv 2024

  4. [4]

    Cribiori, D

    N. Cribiori, D. L¨ ust, and G. Staudt,Black hole entropy and moduli-dependent species scale, Phys. Lett. B844(2023) 138113, [arXiv:2212.10286]

    arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    van de Heisteeg, C

    D. van de Heisteeg, C. Vafa, and M. Wiesner,Bounds on Species Scale and the Distance Conjecture,Fortsch. Phys.71(2023), no. 10-11 2300143, [arXiv:2303.13580]. – 60 –

    arXiv 2023

  6. [6]

    van de Heisteeg, C

    D. van de Heisteeg, C. Vafa, M. Wiesner, and D. H. Wu,Species scale in diverse dimensions, JHEP05(2024) 112, [arXiv:2310.07213]

    arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    Castellano, A

    A. Castellano, A. Herr´ aez, and L. E. Ib´ a˜ nez,On the species scale, modular invariance and the gravitational EFT expansion,JHEP12(2024) 019, [arXiv:2310.07708]

    arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    Dvali,Black Holes and Large N Species Solution to the Hierarchy Problem,Fortsch

    G. Dvali,Black Holes and Large N Species Solution to the Hierarchy Problem,Fortsch. Phys. 58(2010) 528–536, [arXiv:0706.2050]

    arXiv 2010

Show all 179 references
  1. [9]

    Dvali and D

    G. Dvali and D. Lust,Evaporation of Microscopic Black Holes in String Theory and the Bound on Species,Fortsch. Phys.58(2010) 505–527, [arXiv:0912.3167]

    2010 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Dvali and C

    G. Dvali and C. Gomez,Species and Strings,arXiv:1004.3744

    arXiv

  3. [11]

    Dvali, C

    G. Dvali, C. Gomez, and D. Lust,Black Hole Quantum Mechanics in the Presence of Species, Fortsch. Phys.61(2013) 768–778, [arXiv:1206.2365]

    2013 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Castellano,The Quantum Gravity Scale and the Swampland

    A. Castellano,The Quantum Gravity Scale and the Swampland. PhD thesis, U. Autonoma, Madrid (main), 2024.arXiv:2409.10003

    2024 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Aoufia, I

    C. Aoufia, I. Basile, and G. Leone,Species scale, worldsheet CFTs and emergent geometry, JHEP12(2024) 111, [arXiv:2405.03683]

    2024 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Calder´ on-Infante, A

    J. Calder´ on-Infante, A. Castellano, and A. Herr´ aez,The Double EFT Expansion in Quantum Gravity,arXiv:2501.14880

    arXiv

  7. [15]

    Castellano, A

    A. Castellano, A. Herr´ aez, and L. E. Ib´ a˜ nez,The emergence proposal in quantum gravity and the species scale,JHEP06(2023) 047, [arXiv:2212.03908]

    2023 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Gregory and R

    R. Gregory and R. Laflamme,Black strings and p-branes are unstable,Phys. Rev. Lett.70 (1993) 2837–2840, [hep-th/9301052]

    1993 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Gregory and R

    R. Gregory and R. Laflamme,The Instability of charged black strings and p-branes,Nucl. Phys. B428(1994) 399–434, [hep-th/9404071]

    1994 arXiv

  10. [18]

    G. T. Horowitz and J. Polchinski,A Correspondence principle for black holes and strings, Phys. Rev. D55(1997) 6189–6197, [hep-th/9612146]

    1997 arXiv

  11. [19]

    G. T. Horowitz and J. Polchinski,Selfgravitating fundamental strings,Phys. Rev. D57(1998) 2557–2563, [hep-th/9707170]

    1998 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Brustein and Y

    R. Brustein and Y. Zigdon,Effective field theory for closed strings near the Hagedorn temperature,JHEP04(2021) 107, [arXiv:2101.07836]

    2021 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Chen and J

    Y. Chen and J. Maldacena,String scale black holes at large D,JHEP01(2022) 095, [arXiv:2106.02169]

    2022 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Y. Chen, J. Maldacena, and E. Witten,On the black hole/string transition,JHEP01(2023) 103, [arXiv:2109.08563]

    2023 arXiv

  15. [23]

    E. Y. Urbach,String stars in anti de Sitter space,JHEP04(2022) 072, [arXiv:2202.06966]

    2022 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Balthazar, J

    B. Balthazar, J. Chu, and D. Kutasov,Winding Tachyons and Stringy Black Holes, arXiv:2204.00012

    arXiv

  17. [25]

    Balthazar, J

    B. Balthazar, J. Chu, and D. Kutasov,On small black holes in string theory,JHEP03(2024) 116, [arXiv:2210.12033]. – 61 –

    2024 arXiv

  18. [26]

    ˇCeplak, R

    N. ˇCeplak, R. Emparan, A. Puhm, and M. Tomaˇ sevi´ c,The correspondence between rotating black holes and fundamental strings,JHEP11(2023) 226, [arXiv:2307.03573]

    2023 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Herr´ aez, D

    A. Herr´ aez, D. L¨ ust, J. Masias, and M. Scalisi,On the Origin of Species Thermodynamics and the Black Hole - Tower Correspondence,arXiv:2406.17851

    arXiv

  20. [28]

    Albertini, D

    E. Albertini, D. Platt, and T. Wiseman,Towards a uniqueness theorem for static black holes in Kaluza-Klein theory with small circle size,arXiv:2410.20967

    arXiv

  21. [29]

    Chu,From Black Strings to Fundamental Strings: Non-uniformity and Phase Transitions, arXiv:2410.23597

    J. Chu,From Black Strings to Fundamental Strings: Non-uniformity and Phase Transitions, arXiv:2410.23597

    arXiv

  22. [30]

    Emparan, M

    R. Emparan, M. Sanchez-Garitaonandia, and M. Tomaˇ sevi´ c,String Theory in a Pinch: Resolving the Gregory-Laflamme Singularity,arXiv:2411.14998

    arXiv

  23. [31]

    ˇCeplak, R

    N. ˇCeplak, R. Emparan, A. Puhm, and M. Tomaˇ sevi´ c,Size and Shape of Rotating Strings and the Correspondence to Black Holes,arXiv:2411.18690

    arXiv

  24. [32]

    Bedroya and D

    A. Bedroya and D. Wu,String stars ind≥7,arXiv:2412.19888

    arXiv

  25. [33]

    Chu,Phases of String Stars in the Presence of a Spatial Circle,arXiv:2501.03312

    J. Chu,Phases of String Stars in the Presence of a Spatial Circle,arXiv:2501.03312

    arXiv

  26. [34]

    E. B. Bogomolny,Stability of Classical Solutions,Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.24(1976) 449

    1976

  27. [35]

    M. K. Prasad and C. M. Sommerfield,An Exact Classical Solution for the ’t Hooft Monopole and the Julia-Zee Dyon,Phys. Rev. Lett.35(1975) 760–762

    1975

  28. [36]

    Lopes Cardoso, B

    G. Lopes Cardoso, B. de Wit, and T. Mohaupt,Corrections to macroscopic supersymmetric black hole entropy,Phys. Lett. B451(1999) 309–316, [hep-th/9812082]

    1999 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Lopes Cardoso, B

    G. Lopes Cardoso, B. de Wit, and T. Mohaupt,Deviations from the area law for supersymmetric black holes,Fortsch. Phys.48(2000) 49–64, [hep-th/9904005]

    2000 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Lopes Cardoso, B

    G. Lopes Cardoso, B. de Wit, and T. Mohaupt,Macroscopic entropy formulae and nonholomorphic corrections for supersymmetric black holes,Nucl. Phys. B567(2000) 87–110, [hep-th/9906094]

    2000 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Lopes Cardoso, B

    G. Lopes Cardoso, B. de Wit, and T. Mohaupt,Area law corrections from state counting and supergravity,Class. Quant. Grav.17(2000) 1007–1015, [hep-th/9910179]

    2000 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Mohaupt,Black hole entropy, special geometry and strings,Fortsch

    T. Mohaupt,Black hole entropy, special geometry and strings,Fortsch. Phys.49(2001) 3–161, [hep-th/0007195]

    2001 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Ooguri, A

    H. Ooguri, A. Strominger, and C. Vafa,Black hole attractors and the topological string,Phys. Rev. D70(2004) 106007, [hep-th/0405146]

    2004 arXiv

  34. [42]

    R. M. Wald,Black hole entropy is the Noether charge,Phys. Rev. D48(1993), no. 8 R3427–R3431, [gr-qc/9307038]

    1993 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Iyer and R

    V. Iyer and R. M. Wald,Some properties of Noether charge and a proposal for dynamical black hole entropy,Phys. Rev. D50(1994) 846–864, [gr-qc/9403028]

    1994 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Cribiori, D

    N. Cribiori, D. Lust, and C. Montella,Species entropy and thermodynamics,JHEP10(2023) 059, [arXiv:2305.10489]

    2023 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Calder´ on-Infante, M

    J. Calder´ on-Infante, M. Delgado, and A. M. Uranga,Emergence of species scale black hole horizons,JHEP01(2024) 003, [arXiv:2310.04488]. – 62 –

    2024 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Basile, D

    I. Basile, D. L¨ ust, and C. Montella,Shedding black hole light on the emergent string conjecture,JHEP07(2024) 208, [arXiv:2311.12113]

    2024 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Basile, N

    I. Basile, N. Cribiori, D. Lust, and C. Montella,Minimal black holes and species thermodynamics,JHEP06(2024) 127, [arXiv:2401.06851]

    2024 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Bedroya, R

    A. Bedroya, R. K. Mishra, and M. Wiesner,Density of States, Black Holes and the Emergent String Conjecture,arXiv:2405.00083

    arXiv

  41. [49]

    Calder´ on-Infante, M

    J. Calder´ on-Infante, M. Delgado, Y. Li, D. Lust, and A. M. Uranga,Classical Black Hole Probes of UV Scales,arXiv:2502.03514

    arXiv

  42. [50]

    Gopakumar and C

    R. Gopakumar and C. Vafa,M theory and topological strings. 1.,hep-th/9809187

    arXiv

  43. [51]

    Gopakumar and C

    R. Gopakumar and C. Vafa,M theory and topological strings. 2.,hep-th/9812127

    arXiv

  44. [52]

    Ferrara, R

    S. Ferrara, R. Kallosh, and A. Strominger,N=2 extremal black holes,Phys. Rev. D52(1995) R5412–R5416, [hep-th/9508072]

    1995 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Strominger,Macroscopic entropy of N=2 extremal black holes,Phys

    A. Strominger,Macroscopic entropy of N=2 extremal black holes,Phys. Lett. B383(1996) 39–43, [hep-th/9602111]

    1996 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Ferrara and R

    S. Ferrara and R. Kallosh,Supersymmetry and attractors,Phys. Rev. D54(1996) 1514–1524, [hep-th/9602136]

    1996 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Ferrara and R

    S. Ferrara and R. Kallosh,Universality of supersymmetric attractors,Phys. Rev. D54(1996) 1525–1534, [hep-th/9603090]

    1996 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Bodner, A

    M. Bodner, A. C. Cadavid, and S. Ferrara,(2,2) vacuum configurations for type IIA superstrings: N=2 supergravity Lagrangians and algebraic geometry,Class. Quant. Grav.8 (1991) 789–808

    1991

  49. [57]

    de Wit, J

    B. de Wit, J. W. van Holten, and A. Van Proeyen,Structure of N=2 Supergravity,Nucl. Phys. B184(1981) 77. [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 222, 516 (1983)]

    1981

  50. [58]

    de Wit and A

    B. de Wit and A. Van Proeyen,Potentials and Symmetries of General Gauged N=2 Supergravity: Yang-Mills Models,Nucl. Phys. B245(1984) 89–117

    1984

  51. [59]

    de Wit, P

    B. de Wit, P. G. Lauwers, and A. Van Proeyen,Lagrangians of N=2 Supergravity - Matter Systems,Nucl. Phys. B255(1985) 569–608

    1985

  52. [60]

    Cremmer, C

    E. Cremmer, C. Kounnas, A. Van Proeyen, J. P. Derendinger, S. Ferrara, B. de Wit, and L. Girardello,Vector Multiplets Coupled to N=2 Supergravity: SuperHiggs Effect, Flat Potentials and Geometric Structure,Nucl. Phys. B250(1985) 385–426

    1985

  53. [61]

    Strominger,Special Geometry,Commun

    A. Strominger,Special Geometry,Commun. Math. Phys.133(1990) 163–180

    1990

  54. [62]

    Ceresole, R

    A. Ceresole, R. D’Auria, and S. Ferrara,The Symplectic structure of N=2 supergravity and its central extension,Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.46(1996) 67–74, [hep-th/9509160]

    1996 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Craps, F

    B. Craps, F. Roose, W. Troost, and A. Van Proeyen,What is special Kahler geometry?,Nucl. Phys. B503(1997) 565–613, [hep-th/9703082]

    1997 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Craps, F

    B. Craps, F. Roose, W. Troost, and A. Van Proeyen,Special Kahler geometry: Does there exist a prepotential?,NATO Sci. Ser. C520(1999) 449–454, [hep-th/9712092]

    1999 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Bershadsky, S

    M. Bershadsky, S. Cecotti, H. Ooguri, and C. Vafa,Holomorphic anomalies in topological field theories,Nucl. Phys. B405(1993) 279–304, [hep-th/9302103]. – 63 –

    1993 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Bershadsky, S

    M. Bershadsky, S. Cecotti, H. Ooguri, and C. Vafa,Kodaira-Spencer theory of gravity and exact results for quantum string amplitudes,Commun. Math. Phys.165(1994) 311–428, [hep-th/9309140]

    1994 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Antoniadis, E

    I. Antoniadis, E. Gava, K. S. Narain, and T. R. Taylor,Topological amplitudes in string theory,Nucl. Phys. B413(1994) 162–184, [hep-th/9307158]

    1994 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Antoniadis, E

    I. Antoniadis, E. Gava, K. S. Narain, and T. R. Taylor,N=2 type II heterotic duality and higher derivative F terms,Nucl. Phys. B455(1995), no. 1-2 109–130, [hep-th/9507115]

    1995 arXiv

  61. [69]

    de Wit, J

    B. de Wit, J. W. van Holten, and A. Van Proeyen,Transformation Rules of N=2 Supergravity Multiplets,Nucl. Phys. B167(1980) 186

    1980

  62. [70]

    Bergshoeff, M

    E. Bergshoeff, M. de Roo, and B. de Wit,Extended Conformal Supergravity,Nucl. Phys. B 182(1981) 173–204

    1981

  63. [71]

    de Roo, J

    M. de Roo, J. W. van Holten, B. de Wit, and A. Van Proeyen,Chiral Superfields inN= 2 Supergravity,Nucl. Phys. B173(1980) 175–188

    1980

  64. [72]

    Candelas and X

    P. Candelas and X. de la Ossa,Moduli Space of Calabi-Yau Manifolds,Nucl. Phys. B355 (1991) 455–481

    1991

  65. [73]

    Bastianelli, J

    F. Bastianelli, J. M. Davila, and C. Schubert,Gravitational corrections to the Euler-Heisenberg Lagrangian,JHEP03(2009) 086, [arXiv:0812.4849]

    2009 arXiv

  66. [74]

    G. V. Dunne,Heisenberg-Euler effective Lagrangians: Basics and extensions, pp. 445–522. 6, 2004.hep-th/0406216

    2004 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Chadha and P

    S. Chadha and P. Olesen,On Borel Singularities in Quantum Field Theory,Phys. Lett. B72 (1977) 87–90

    1977

  68. [76]

    Hattab and E

    J. Hattab and E. Palti,Non-perturbative topological string theory on compact Calabi-Yau manifolds from M-theory,JHEP04(2025) 017, [arXiv:2408.09255]

    2025 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Hattab and E

    J. Hattab and E. Palti,Notes on integrating out M2 branes,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025), no. 1 107, [arXiv:2410.15809]

    2025 arXiv

  70. [78]

    J. S. Schwinger,On gauge invariance and vacuum polarization,Phys. Rev.82(1951) 664–679

    1951

  71. [79]

    Dedushenko and E

    M. Dedushenko and E. Witten,Some Details On The Gopakumar-Vafa and Ooguri-Vafa Formulas,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.20(2016) 1–133, [arXiv:1411.7108]

    2016 arXiv

  72. [80]

    G. W. Moore,Strings and Arithmetic, inLes Houches School of Physics: Frontiers in Number Theory, Physics and Geometry, pp. 303–359, 2007.hep-th/0401049

    2007 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Behrndt, G

    K. Behrndt, G. Lopes Cardoso, B. de Wit, R. Kallosh, D. Lust, and T. Mohaupt,Classical and quantum N=2 supersymmetric black holes,Nucl. Phys. B488(1997) 236–260, [hep-th/9610105]

    1997 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Behrndt, G

    K. Behrndt, G. Lopes Cardoso, B. de Wit, D. Lust, T. Mohaupt, and W. A. Sabra,Higher order black hole solutions in N=2 supergravity and Calabi-Yau string backgrounds,Phys. Lett. B429(1998) 289–296, [hep-th/9801081]

    1998 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Lopes Cardoso, B

    G. Lopes Cardoso, B. de Wit, J. Kappeli, and T. Mohaupt,Stationary BPS solutions in N=2 supergravity with R**2 interactions,JHEP12(2000) 019, [hep-th/0009234]

    2000 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Witten,Topological Sigma Models,Commun

    E. Witten,Topological Sigma Models,Commun. Math. Phys.118(1988) 411. – 64 –

    1988

  77. [85]

    Witten,Mirror manifolds and topological field theory,AMS/IP Stud

    E. Witten,Mirror manifolds and topological field theory,AMS/IP Stud. Adv. Math.9(1998) 121–160, [hep-th/9112056]

    1998 arXiv

  78. [86]

    J. M. F. Labastida and P. M. Llatas,Topological matter in two-dimensions,Nucl. Phys. B379 (1992) 220–258, [hep-th/9112051]

    1992 arXiv

  79. [87]

    J. M. F. Labastida and M. Marino,Type B topological matter, Kodaira-Spencer theory, and mirror symmetry,Phys. Lett. B333(1994) 386–395, [hep-th/9405151]

    1994 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Ferrara,Bertotti-Robinson geometry and supersymmetry, in12th Italian Conference on General Relativity and Gravitational Physics, pp

    S. Ferrara,Bertotti-Robinson geometry and supersymmetry, in12th Italian Conference on General Relativity and Gravitational Physics, pp. 135–147, 1, 1997.hep-th/9701163

    1997 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Ferrara, M

    S. Ferrara, M. Kaku, P. K. Townsend, and P. van Nieuwenhuizen,Gauging the Graded Conformal Group with Unitary Internal Symmetries,Nucl. Phys. B129(1977) 125–134

    1977

  82. [90]

    Van Proeyen,Superconformal tensor calculus in N=1 and N=2 superrgavity, in19th Winter School and Workshop on Theoretical Physics: Supersymmetry and Supergravity, 4, 1983

    A. Van Proeyen,Superconformal tensor calculus in N=1 and N=2 superrgavity, in19th Winter School and Workshop on Theoretical Physics: Supersymmetry and Supergravity, 4, 1983

    1983

  83. [91]

    de Wit,Introduction to Supergravity, inSpring School on Supergravity and Supersymmetry, 6, 1984

    B. de Wit,Introduction to Supergravity, inSpring School on Supergravity and Supersymmetry, 6, 1984

    1984

  84. [92]

    Robles-Llana, F

    D. Robles-Llana, F. Saueressig, and S. Vandoren,String loop corrected hypermultiplet moduli spaces,JHEP03(2006) 081, [hep-th/0602164]

    2006 arXiv

  85. [93]

    de Wit, S

    B. de Wit, S. Katmadas, and M. van Zalk,New supersymmetric higher-derivative couplings: Full N=2 superspace does not count!,JHEP01(2011) 007, [arXiv:1010.2150]

    2011 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Murthy and V

    S. Murthy and V. Reys,Quantum black hole entropy and the holomorphic prepotential of N=2 supergravity,JHEP10(2013) 099, [arXiv:1306.3796]

    2013 arXiv

  87. [95]

    de Wit, B

    B. de Wit, B. Kleijn, and S. Vandoren,Superconformal hypermultiplets,Nucl. Phys. B568 (2000) 475–502, [hep-th/9909228]

    2000 arXiv

  88. [96]

    Strominger and C

    A. Strominger and C. Vafa,Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy,Phys. Lett. B379(1996) 99–104, [hep-th/9601029]

    1996 arXiv

  89. [97]

    Zaffaroni,AdS black holes, holography and localization,Living Rev

    A. Zaffaroni,AdS black holes, holography and localization,Living Rev. Rel.23(2020), no. 1 2, [arXiv:1902.07176]

    2020 arXiv

  90. [98]

    de Wit, F

    B. de Wit, F. Vanderseypen, and A. Van Proeyen,Symmetry structure of special geometries, Nucl. Phys. B400(1993) 463–524, [hep-th/9210068]

    1993 arXiv

  91. [99]

    J. A. Harvey and G. W. Moore,Algebras, BPS states, and strings,Nucl. Phys. B463(1996) 315–368, [hep-th/9510182]

    1996 arXiv

  92. [100]

    S. H. Katz, A. Klemm, and C. Vafa,M theory, topological strings and spinning black holes, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.3(1999) 1445–1537, [hep-th/9910181]

    1999 arXiv

  93. [101]

    T. W. Grimm, K. Mayer, and M. Weissenbacher,Higher derivatives in Type II and M-theory on Calabi-Yau threefolds,JHEP02(2018) 127, [arXiv:1702.08404]

    2018 arXiv

  94. [102]

    Marino and G

    M. Marino and G. W. Moore,Counting higher genus curves in a Calabi-Yau manifold,Nucl. Phys. B543(1999) 592–614, [hep-th/9808131]

    1999 arXiv

  95. [103]

    Faber and R

    C. Faber and R. Pandharipande,Hodge integrals and Gromov-Witten theory,Inventiones mathematicae139(2000), no. 1 173–199, [math/9810173]. – 65 –

    2000 arXiv

  96. [104]

    J. P. Gauntlett, J. B. Gutowski, C. M. Hull, S. Pakis, and H. S. Reall,All supersymmetric solutions of minimal supergravity in five- dimensions,Class. Quant. Grav.20(2003) 4587–4634, [hep-th/0209114]

    2003 arXiv

  97. [105]

    Shmakova,Calabi-Yau black holes,Phys

    M. Shmakova,Calabi-Yau black holes,Phys. Rev. D56(1997) 540–544, [hep-th/9612076]

    1997 arXiv

  98. [106]

    Marchesano, L

    F. Marchesano, L. Melotti, and L. Paoloni,On the moduli space curvature at infinity,JHEP 02(2024) 103, [arXiv:2311.07979]

    2024 arXiv

  99. [107]

    Marchesano, L

    F. Marchesano, L. Melotti, and M. Wiesner,Asymptotic curvature divergences and non-gravitational theories,arXiv:2409.02991

    arXiv

  100. [108]

    Castellano, F

    A. Castellano, F. Marchesano, L. Melotti, and L. Paoloni,The Moduli Space Curvature and the Weak Gravity Conjecture,arXiv:2410.10966

    arXiv

  101. [109]

    To appear

    A. Castellano, F. Marchesano, and L. Paoloni, “To appear.”

  102. [110]

    Ferrara, G

    S. Ferrara, G. W. Gibbons, and R. Kallosh,Black holes and critical points in moduli space, Nucl. Phys. B500(1997) 75–93, [hep-th/9702103]

    1997 arXiv

  103. [111]

    S. H. Shenker,The Strength of nonperturbative effects in string theory, inCargese Study Institute: Random Surfaces, Quantum Gravity and Strings, pp. 809–819, 8, 1990

    1990

  104. [112]

    Pasquetti and R

    S. Pasquetti and R. Schiappa,Borel and Stokes Nonperturbative Phenomena in Topological String Theory and c=1 Matrix Models,Annales Henri Poincare11(2010) 351–431, [arXiv:0907.4082]

    2010 arXiv

  105. [113]

    To appear

    A. Castellano and M. Zatti, “To appear.”

  106. [114]

    Witten,Some comments on string dynamics, inSTRINGS 95: Future Perspectives in String Theory, pp

    E. Witten,Some comments on string dynamics, inSTRINGS 95: Future Perspectives in String Theory, pp. 501–523, 7, 1995.hep-th/9507121

    1995 arXiv

  107. [115]

    A. C. Cadavid, A. Ceresole, R. D’Auria, and S. Ferrara,Eleven-dimensional supergravity compactified on Calabi-Yau threefolds,Phys. Lett. B357(1995) 76–80, [hep-th/9506144]

    1995 arXiv

  108. [116]

    J. M. Maldacena,Black holes in string theory. PhD thesis, Princeton U., 1996. hep-th/9607235

    1996 arXiv

  109. [117]

    J. M. Maldacena, A. Strominger, and E. Witten,Black hole entropy in M theory,JHEP12 (1997) 002, [hep-th/9711053]

    1997 arXiv

  110. [118]

    Cappelli, C

    A. Cappelli, C. Itzykson, and J. B. Zuber,Modular invariant partition functions in two dimensions,Nucl. Phys. B280(1987) 445–465

    1987

  111. [119]

    Di Francesco, P

    P. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu, and D. Senechal,Conformal Field Theory. Graduate Texts in Contemporary Physics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1997

    1997

  112. [120]

    Miyaoka,The chern classes and kodaira dimension of a minimal variety, inAlgebraic Geometry (Sendai, 1985), vol

    Y. Miyaoka,The chern classes and kodaira dimension of a minimal variety, inAlgebraic Geometry (Sendai, 1985), vol. 10 ofAdvanced Studies in Pure Mathematics, pp. 449–476. 1987

    1985

  113. [121]

    Kanazawa and P

    A. Kanazawa and P. M. H. Wilson,Trilinear forms and Chern classes of Calabi-Yau threefolds, Osaka Journal of Mathematics 51 no. 1, (2014) 203–213(2013) [arXiv:1201.3266]

    2014 arXiv

  114. [122]

    Vafa,Black holes and Calabi-Yau threefolds,Adv

    C. Vafa,Black holes and Calabi-Yau threefolds,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 207–218, [hep-th/9711067]

    1998 arXiv

  115. [123]

    J. A. Harvey, R. Minasian, and G. W. Moore,NonAbelian tensor multiplet anomalies,JHEP 09(1998) 004, [hep-th/9808060]. – 66 –

    1998 arXiv

  116. [124]

    de Antonio Martin, T

    A. de Antonio Martin, T. Ortin, and C. S. Shahbazi,The FGK formalism for black p-branes in d dimensions,JHEP05(2012) 045, [arXiv:1203.0260]

    2012 arXiv

  117. [125]

    Meessen, T

    P. Meessen, T. Ortin, J. Perz, and C. S. Shahbazi,Black holes and black strings of N=2, d=5 supergravity in the H-FGK formalism,JHEP09(2012) 001, [arXiv:1204.0507]

    2012 arXiv

  118. [126]

    Gomez-Fayren, P

    C. Gomez-Fayren, P. Meessen, T. Ortin, and M. Zatti,Wald entropy in Kaluza-Klein black holes,JHEP08(2023) 039, [arXiv:2305.01742]

    2023 arXiv

  119. [127]

    Sen,Black hole entropy function and the attractor mechanism in higher derivative gravity, JHEP09(2005) 038, [hep-th/0506177]

    A. Sen,Black hole entropy function and the attractor mechanism in higher derivative gravity, JHEP09(2005) 038, [hep-th/0506177]

    2005 arXiv

  120. [128]

    Kraus and F

    P. Kraus and F. Larsen,Microscopic black hole entropy in theories with higher derivatives, JHEP09(2005) 034, [hep-th/0506176]

    2005 arXiv

  121. [129]

    Castro, J

    A. Castro, J. L. Davis, P. Kraus, and F. Larsen,5D attractors with higher derivatives,JHEP 04(2007) 091, [hep-th/0702072]

    2007 arXiv

  122. [130]

    Antoniadis, S

    I. Antoniadis, S. Ferrara, R. Minasian, and K. S. Narain,R**4 couplings in M and type II theories on Calabi-Yau spaces,Nucl. Phys. B507(1997) 571–588, [hep-th/9707013]

    1997 arXiv

  123. [131]

    Marino,Les Houches lectures on non-perturbative topological strings,arXiv:2411.16211

    M. Marino,Les Houches lectures on non-perturbative topological strings,arXiv:2411.16211

  124. [132]

    Hattab and E

    J. Hattab and E. Palti,Emergent potentials and non-perturbative open topological strings, JHEP10(2024) 195, [arXiv:2408.12302]

    2024 arXiv

  125. [133]

    Hattab and E

    J. Hattab and E. Palti,On Calabi-Yau Manifolds at Strong Topological String Coupling, Fortsch. Phys.72(2024), no. 12 2400199, [arXiv:2409.01721]

    2024 arXiv

  126. [134]

    Lin and G

    P. Lin and G. Shiu,Schwinger Effect of Extremal Reissner-Nordstr¨ om Black Holes, arXiv:2409.02197

    arXiv

  127. [135]

    Gendler and I

    N. Gendler and I. Valenzuela,Merging the weak gravity and distance conjectures using BPS extremal black holes,JHEP01(2021) 176, [arXiv:2004.10768]

    2021 arXiv

  128. [136]

    Heidenreich,Black Holes, Moduli, and Long-Range Forces,JHEP11(2020) 029, [arXiv:2006.09378]

    B. Heidenreich,Black Holes, Moduli, and Long-Range Forces,JHEP11(2020) 029, [arXiv:2006.09378]

    2020 arXiv

  129. [137]

    Heidenreich and M

    B. Heidenreich and M. Lotito,Proving the Weak Gravity Conjecture in Perturbative String Theory, Part I: The Bosonic String,arXiv:2401.14449

    arXiv

  130. [138]

    Gaiotto, A

    D. Gaiotto, A. Strominger, and X. Yin,New connections between 4-D and 5-D black holes, JHEP02(2006) 024, [hep-th/0503217]

    2006 arXiv

  131. [139]

    Kallosh, A

    R. Kallosh, A. Rajaraman, and W. K. Wong,Supersymmetric rotating black holes and attractors,Phys. Rev. D55(1997) R3246–R3249, [hep-th/9611094]

    1997 arXiv

  132. [140]

    Larsen,The Attractor Mechanism in Five Dimensions,Lect

    F. Larsen,The Attractor Mechanism in Five Dimensions,Lect. Notes Phys.755(2008) 249–281, [hep-th/0608191]

    2008 arXiv

  133. [141]

    M. D. Schwartz,Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model. Cambridge University Press, 3, 2014

    2014

  134. [142]

    S. P. Kim and D. N. Page,Schwinger pair production in electric and magnetic fields,Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 065020, [hep-th/0301132]

    2006 arXiv

  135. [143]

    G. V. Dunne and C. Schubert,Two loop selfdual Euler-Heisenberg Lagrangians. 2. Imaginary part and Borel analysis,JHEP06(2002) 042, [hep-th/0205005]. – 67 –

    2002 arXiv

  136. [144]

    G. V. Dunne and C. Schubert,Closed form two loop Euler-Heisenberg Lagrangian in a selfdual background,Phys. Lett. B526(2002) 55–60, [hep-th/0111134]

    2002 arXiv

  137. [145]

    G. V. Dunne and C. Schubert,Two loop selfdual Euler-Heisenberg Lagrangians. 1. Real part and helicity amplitudes,JHEP08(2002) 053, [hep-th/0205004]

    2002 arXiv

  138. [146]

    Apostol,Modular Functions and Dirichlet Series in Number Theory

    T. Apostol,Modular Functions and Dirichlet Series in Number Theory. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer New York, 2012

    2012

  139. [147]

    L. V. Ahlfors,Complex Analysis. McGraw-Hill Book Company, 2 ed

  140. [148]

    Castellano, D

    A. Castellano, D. L¨ ust, C. Montella, and M. Zatti,Quantum Calabi-Yau Black Holes and Non-Perturbative D0-brane Effects,arXiv:2505.15920

  141. [149]

    S.-J. Lee, W. Lerche, and T. Weigand,Emergent strings from infinite distance limits,JHEP 02(2022) 190, [arXiv:1910.01135]

    2022 arXiv

  142. [150]

    Gabriel and P

    C. Gabriel and P. Spindel,Quantum charged fields in (1+1) rindler space,Annals of Physics 284(Sept., 2000) 263–335

    2000

  143. [151]

    Friedmann and H

    T. Friedmann and H. L. Verlinde,Schwinger pair creation of Kaluza-Klein particles: Pair creation without tunneling,Phys. Rev. D71(2005) 064018, [hep-th/0212163]

    2005 arXiv

  144. [152]

    J. G. Russo,On Schwinger Pair Creation in Gravity and in Closed Superstring Theory,JHEP 03(2009) 080, [arXiv:0901.1664]

    2009 arXiv

  145. [153]

    P. A. Cano, P. F. Ram ´ ırez, and A. Ruip´ erez,The small black hole illusion,JHEP03(2020) 115, [arXiv:1808.10449]

    2020 arXiv

  146. [154]

    F. J. Dyson,Divergence of perturbation theory in quantum electrodynamics,Phys. Rev.85 (1952) 631–632

    1952

  147. [155]

    Dorigoni,An Introduction to Resurgence, Trans-Series and Alien Calculus,Annals Phys

    D. Dorigoni,An Introduction to Resurgence, Trans-Series and Alien Calculus,Annals Phys. 409(2019) 167914, [arXiv:1411.3585]

    2019 arXiv

  148. [156]

    White,Asymptotic Analysis of Differential Equations

    R. White,Asymptotic Analysis of Differential Equations. Asymptotic Analysis of Differential Equations. Imperial College Press, 2010

    2010

  149. [157]

    C. M. Bender and T. T. Wu,Large order behavior of Perturbation theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.27 (1971) 461

    1971

  150. [158]

    C. M. Bender and T. T. Wu,Anharmonic oscillator. 2: A Study of perturbation theory in large order,Phys. Rev. D7(1973) 1620–1636

    1973

  151. [159]

    J. C. Collins and D. E. Soper,Large Order Expansion in Perturbation Theory,Annals Phys. 112(1978) 209–234

    1978

  152. [160]

    Zinn-Justin,Perturbation Series at Large Orders in Quantum Mechanics and Field Theories: Application to the Problem of Resummation,Phys

    J. Zinn-Justin,Perturbation Series at Large Orders in Quantum Mechanics and Field Theories: Application to the Problem of Resummation,Phys. Rept.70(1981) 109

    1981

  153. [161]

    J. C. Le Guillou and J. Zinn-Justin, eds.,Large order behavior of perturbation theory. 1990

    1990

  154. [162]

    Ecalle,Les fonctions resurgentes

    J. Ecalle,Les fonctions resurgentes. 1. Les alg` ebres de fonctions r´ esurgentes. No. parte 3,v. 1 in Fonctions r´ esurgentes. Univ. de Paris-Sud, D´ ep. de Math´ ematique, 1981

    1981

  155. [163]

    Gu, A.-K

    J. Gu, A.-K. Kashani-Poor, A. Klemm, and M. Marino,Non-perturbative topological string theory on compact Calabi-Yau 3-folds,SciPost Phys.16(2024), no. 3 079, [arXiv:2305.19916]. – 68 –

    2024 arXiv

  156. [164]

    Gu and M

    J. Gu and M. Marino,Peacock patterns and new integer invariants in topological string theory, SciPost Phys.12(2022), no. 2 058, [arXiv:2104.07437]

    2022 arXiv

  157. [165]

    Mari˜ no,Instantons and Large N: An Introduction to Non-Perturbative Methods in Quantum Field Theory

    M. Mari˜ no,Instantons and Large N: An Introduction to Non-Perturbative Methods in Quantum Field Theory. Cambridge University Press, 9, 2015

    2015

  158. [166]

    A. H. Taub,Empty space-times admitting a three parameter group of motions,Annals Math. 53(1951) 472–490

    1951

  159. [167]

    Newman, L

    E. Newman, L. Tamburino, and T. Unti,Empty space generalization of the Schwarzschild metric,J. Math. Phys.4(1963) 915

    1963

  160. [168]

    S. W. Hawking,Gravitational Instantons,Phys. Lett. A60(1977) 81

    1977

  161. [169]

    R. D. Sorkin,Kaluza-Klein Monopole,Phys. Rev. Lett.51(1983) 87–90

    1983

  162. [170]

    D. J. Gross and M. J. Perry,Magnetic Monopoles in Kaluza-Klein Theories,Nucl. Phys. B 226(1983) 29–48

    1983

  163. [171]

    Sen,Dynamics of multiple Kaluza-Klein monopoles in M and string theory,Adv

    A. Sen,Dynamics of multiple Kaluza-Klein monopoles in M and string theory,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.1(1998) 115–126, [hep-th/9707042]

    1998 arXiv

  164. [172]

    S. D. Majumdar,A class of exact solutions of Einstein ’s field equations,Phys. Rev.72(1947) 390–398

    1947

  165. [173]

    Papaetrou,A Static solution of the equations of the gravitational field for an arbitrary charge distribution,Proc

    A. Papaetrou,A Static solution of the equations of the gravitational field for an arbitrary charge distribution,Proc. Roy. Irish Acad. A51(1947) 191–204

    1947

  166. [174]

    J. B. Hartle and S. W. Hawking,Solutions of the Einstein-Maxwell equations with many black holes,Commun. Math. Phys.26(1972) 87–101

    1972

  167. [175]

    Asano,Compactification and identification of branes in the Kaluza-Klein monopole backgrounds,hep-th/0003241

    M. Asano,Compactification and identification of branes in the Kaluza-Klein monopole backgrounds,hep-th/0003241

    arXiv

  168. [176]

    Eguchi and A

    T. Eguchi and A. J. Hanson,Selfdual Solutions to Euclidean Gravity,Annals Phys.120(1979) 82

    1979

  169. [177]

    J. P. Gauntlett, R. C. Myers, and P. K. Townsend,Black holes of D = 5 supergravity,Class. Quant. Grav.16(1999) 1–21, [hep-th/9810204]

    1999 arXiv

  170. [178]

    Witten,String theory dynamics in various dimensions,Nucl

    E. Witten,String theory dynamics in various dimensions,Nucl. Phys. B443(1995) 85–126, [hep-th/9503124]

    1995 arXiv

  171. [179]

    Ortin,Gravity and Strings

    T. Ortin,Gravity and Strings. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 2nd ed. ed., 7, 2015. – 69 –

    2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.